Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
20110509-Schaliegas Als Mogelijke Nieuwe Energiebron

20110509-Schaliegas Als Mogelijke Nieuwe Energiebron

Ratings: (0)|Views: 29 |Likes:
Published by Schaliegas

More info:

Published by: Schaliegas on May 24, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Schaliegas als mogelijke nieuwe energiebron (en)
Met dank overgenomen vanEU observer (EUOBSERVER)1, gepubliceerd op 9 mei 2011, 16:33.EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - Heralded as an energy game-changer by supporters, perceived asenvironmentally pernicious by critics, shale gas is both controversial and increasingly on the Europeanagenda.Trapped in shale rock deep under the earth's surface, the 'unconventional' gas has grown from just onepercent of US domestic gas production a decade ago to roughly 20 percent today, with major reservesdiscovered all across the globe.A recent report by the US Energy Information Administration put the volume of technically recoverableshale gas in Europe at 17.5 trillion cubic metres, compared with 24.5 trillion in the US.This, coupled with key advances in extraction technology, has not gone unnoticed this side of theAtlantic, with upcoming EU presidency-holders Poland among states most keen to tap the new energysource and break the region's reliance on gas imports from Russia.The industry itself has been quick to label shale gas as a 'green' alternative to coal and a vital tool inEurope's fight against climate change, embarking on a furious lobbying effort in recent months in a bidto secure favourable legislation.Published by the European Commission in March, an EU '2050 roadmap' on decarbonising the region'seconomy says nothing on shale gas, with all eyes now on a follow-up energy 'roadmap' scheduled forthis autumn."The possible impact of future European unconventional gas production on the EU's energy mix isdifficult to assess," the commission told this website in written replies to questions."It is still to be proven … whether any areas with geological potential will allow economically viable gasproduction at commercial scale."
Others are keen to push ahead however, with test drilling underway in several member states,including the UK, Germany and Poland.Speaking at an event in Brussels last Friday (6 May), Maciej Szpunar, under-secretary of state at thePolish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, made his government's intentions clear. "Shale gas will be a priorityunder the Polish EU presidency," he told the audience of EU, industry and NGO officials.Polish Oil and Gas Company (POGS) vice-president Marek Karabula was still clearer. "Please don't bealarmed when we in Poland push ahead very strongly [with shale gas] as it will allow us to make up fora 45-year gap," he said.Despite its omission from earlier drafts, Warsaw successfully secured a reference to shale gas in thefinal conclusions of an extraordinary summit of EU leaders in February, a bid to open the door topotential EU subsidies for industry development, say people close to the discussions.At the same time, the world's largest oil companies are busily securing land across Europe with a viewto exploiting the region's shale gas reserves.
Schaliegas als mogelijke nieuwe energiebron (en) - Europa Nuhttp://www.europa-nu.nl/id/vip6mtxiuhzt/nieuws/schaliegas_al...1 of 324/05/11 14:50
Cuadrilla Resources bored its first shale gas well in the UK last year, Chevron is planning its first well inPoland later this year, while ExxonMobil recently finished drilling its sixth well in north-west Germany.
Major obstacles still exist concedes Karabula. "Polish Oil and Gas Company will need to crack the mindsof Polish citizens," he told the conference, an acknowledgement of the considerable opposition fromcivil society and environmental groups towards the energy source.Fears have been nourished by reports that shale extraction in the US has led to water contamination,exploding rigs and gas seeping out household water taps - portrayed in the Oscar-nominateddocumentary 'Gasland'.Such concerns led New York authorities to place a temporary moratorium on the drilling of new shalegas wells, with France doing likewise until greater information is known."While all environmentalists agree on the need to move away from coal, I don't think you will find muchenthusiasm for shale gas," Jesse Scott of EG3, an NGO which campaigns for sustainable development,told the conference.Many doubts relate to the negative side-effects of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, the process of pumping millions of litres of water, mixed with sand and chemicals, down the bore hole in order tosmash the shale rock and collect the released gas.The toxicity of fracking chemicals and how they are disposed of once used, as well as the large volumesof water needed, have all raised question marks. Others suggest fracking alters a locality's water table,with important knock-on effects for wildlife and humans.A new study by the European Centre for Energy and Resource Security (Eucers) last week said"unconventional gas resources might be able to cover European gas demand for at least another 60years", but added that region's high population density could pose problems.Shale gas drilling requires many more wells to be sunk than convention gas drilling.The same report added that current EU environmental legislation is "not adequate" for ensuringenvironmentally friendly exploration and production of shale gas.
Fighting climate change
Industry has been quick to point to the lower emissions produced when burning gas compared to coal,hailing shale as the new green energy of the future.An unpublished economic analysis commissioned by the European Gas Advocacy Forum (EGAF), andleaked to the Guardian newspaper, said Europe could save about €900 billion by 2050 if it met itsemissions targets through investment in gas rather than renewables.The paper's conclusions have since met with several strong challenges however, including from theEuropean Climate Foundation (ECF), the green think-tank whose 'open source' data was used in theanalysis.On top of this, a peer-viewed paper by Robert Howarth, a professor of ecology and environmentalbiology at Cornell University in the US, last month suggested methane leakage into the earth'satmosphere during shale gas extraction made the energy source actually dirtier than coal.
Schaliegas als mogelijke nieuwe energiebron (en) - Europa Nuhttp://www.europa-nu.nl/id/vip6mtxiuhzt/nieuws/schaliegas_al...2 of 324/05/11 14:50

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->