Page 3/5 May 26, 2011
Request for review of conduct of the clerk (Dkt #5)
Request for statement on therecord by Judge Leon and Clerk Whittington (Dkt #6)
were filed in protest of denialof right to file papers in cour
Memorandum Opinion and Order by Judge Richard Leon (Dkt #7,8)
were mailedwith no authentication (NEF – notice of electronic filing) and therefore cannot be deemed valid courtrecords (see below).
“Leave to File Denied” (Dkt #none) –
later, Petitioner received by mail the face pages of his eightpapers, which were never docketed, with hand inscriptions “Leave to file denied, RJL”. [
Request for Authentication Records (NEFs) (Dkt # 9)
Judge Leon never ruled on therequest, and access to the authentication records has been denied to this date.
Judge Leon and Clerk Mayer-Whittington engaged in the same conduct in a case pertaining to Judge Olinda Evans, US Court, Northern District of Georgia
Windsor v Evans et
in the US Court, District of Columbia,
Plaintiff WilliamWindsor filed complaint under cause of actions of
Deprivation of rights under the color of law
, 42 USC§1983, pertaining to conduct of US Judge Olinda Evans of the US District Court, Northern District of Georgia. [
]The case is of particular interest, since it provides evidence of cover up of judicial corruption, not only byJudge Richard Leon in the US District Court in Washington DC, but also by the US courts of appeals and theUS Supreme Court. [
]The evidence shows that Judge Leon and Clerk Mayer-Whittington engaged in the exact same conduct in
Windsor v Evans et al
] and in
Zernik v Melson et al
– denial of the right to file papers in the court.
Invalid electronic systems of the US courts (PACER and CM/ECF) are germane to such conduct
The PACER docket and other reports in this case provide additional evidence of the conduct of Simulated Litigation: [
No event is listed in the Calendar of the Court,
No Judgment is listed in the Judgment Index of the Court,
The Petition is not listed as “terminated” in the Related Transaction Report, although the case islisted as closed.Reports regarding fraud in the design and operation of PACER and CM/ECF have been previouslypublished in the National Law Journal [
] and in an international, peer-reviewed computer science journal with Editorial Board naming scholars from six European nations and Canada. [
]Request was also submitted to Harvard Law Professor Yochai Benkler, an expert on computers and thelaw, to review the evidence. [
US judges are not ready, willing, able to address corruption of the state and US judges.
The case of
Zernik v Melson et al
, and other similar cases in the US district courts, US courts of appeals, andSupreme Court of the United States document that the US courts have ef fectively established a policy,prohibiting the filing of papers, which document judicial corruption. [
]US judges are not ready, willing, able to address corruption of the state and US judges.US Congress should perform its duties.