Marriage the relic

Marriage and monogamy while being demonstrably unnatural in a biologicalsense may have also cost us the cure for cancer in part.Marriage is an extension of the monogamous system whereby the sexualrights of one man and one woman are restricted to each other for abstract reasons,such as the Church saying, "God said to". This union has economic consequencesalso, such as the woman now having 50% control in whatever interest she marriedinto and vice versa, at least on exit.What is the fundamental difference between a man's sex and a woman's sexin terms of society biology and economy? Obviously, one is far more valuable. Afterall the very definition of male and female for identification purposes in new speciesis which one pursues and which one chooses. It is far easier for a woman to ‘sell’rights to her sexually than it is for a male to do the same. It is far easier for awoman to bed her way into a higher tax bracket than it is for a man. This is actuallyquite bad for women, I'll explain how further on.Since a woman's sexuality has more value than a man's, it stands out. Taketwo lawyers for example, both average looking, one male one female, both equalskill and education. Yet the woman's sex has more value, so it stands out. Thismakes life hell for her because she's chosen to not make her sexuality her careerchoice. This woman now has to work harder to be seen as just a lawyer and not ahot chick, or sex object. In short she has to bust her ass to make her skills’ valueeclipse the value of her sexuality in order that she be seen as a person. And not say,a carrot on a stick, or a trophy.A man does not have this problem because a man's sex is near worthless inAmerican society - his skill set and his income are far more important to hishappiness.

So if women want to be truly equal with men they need to give away their sex rather than sell it, like the men do.

This would also devalue wealth andreduce greed.Because of this extra effort required of the woman to just to break even,many women go with the flow and simply work towards enhancing their sexualityand make that their means of employment. So basically women encourage the saleof their sexual rights for the same reason men chose not to - ease. This is dangerous for humanity because if a beautiful girl is born with a giftfor logic she's now less likely to be a scientist, since it’s harder for her to be ascientist and easier for her to pout on a magazine cover and make 10 times themoney. This trend taken to the larger social scale shows us that the extra value

placed on a woman's sexuality is costing us scientists, and thus progress. I'll submitthat progress is a good thing, the Amish and Taliban notwithstanding. Alsoconsidering that women make up half our population, this becomes a huge amountof lost progress, even more so considering the nature of scientific expansion. Oneuseful fact often leads to two others, the process becomes exponential, therefore sotoo is the loss. Consider Moore’s law. As time marches on the losses mount up everfaster like compound interest in reverse.What does all this have to do with marriage? Well, the extra value placed on awoman's sexuality is purely social. That is, there are social mechanisms in placewhich garner female sexuality artificial value, marriage being the most commonexample in America of the false value increase. To draw an analogy, marriage isbasically a rule which prevents the sale of water for food in the desert, and as aresult many starve to death or die of hunger. Allow me to explain.Sexual, and indeed all, value is a function of desirability and availability,supply and demand. Let's view sex with a woman as a product, and sex with abeautiful woman as a more valuable product than sex with an average woman. If abeautiful woman is married she is now barred from selling this product openly toanyone, regardless of emotional or other profit to herself or potential buyers. Thisregulation, this exterior control of the function of the market has seriously negativeconsequences, as the market struggles against the limitations needlessly applied. This often causes murder, since a man who has ‘lost’ a woman he loves toanother man, knows that there is now no longer a legitimate way for him to win heraffections if the value of this woman's sex has been elevated to monopoly levels. Italso works the other way, but the other value is wealth not beauty. Monogamyincreases the sexual and monetary profit to be gained by murder of competingmates since sharing mates is not a socially accepted alternative, even among thevery beautiful and the very wealthy. An abstract can always beat out economicsbecause it isn't based on anything real. Like selling wishes. Hence rich or beautifulpeople occasionally killing each other.As any student of economics knows, when an abstract rule interferes with theprocess of the market, values become artificially depressed or inflated. Since manybeautiful women are married, they can no longer add their supply of premium sexto the market, no matter it’s demand. This inflates the value of available remainingsex in the market, while subsequently annihilating any value to the public her ownsex has.This hurts everyone. It hurts buyers because now they have to compete witha larger number of people for the same sex, and it hurts sellers because theircustomer base is reduced to one, and their value beyond their sexuality is furtherand further eclipsed. This has a dehumanizing effect on men

and

women post

marriage and it inflates the value of wealth and beauty in terms of mate selection.Men are now reduced to a net income figure, and women are reduced tomeasurements or ‘vital statistics’ as if a woman’s breast size is ‘vital’. Honesty,novelty, creativity, intelligence, and even looks, in the case of men, fall by thewayside eclipsed by the now more scarce but less important values of wealth andbeauty.Neither side does this out of cruelty, it must be stated, I am not blaming agiven gender. Women engage in this sort of activity because as their sex becomesmore valuable they gain a wider range of choices for less and less effort, which asI’ll cover later is a noble effort. So why wouldn't a woman pick a man that'shandsome and honest

as well as

rich?Men on the other hand do this because it's hard to become rich, and thatmeans of the values, honesty, good looks, and wealth, wealth becomes thescarcest. If there are more men who are merely handsome and honest as opposedto men who are handsome, honest and rich, then suddenly handsome and honestboth mean less. Also, rich is often dependant on public perception, rich mensometimes cannot afford to be seen as "playboys", they have stock holders toimpress, or political careers, or reputations, and that often means a wife is required,to demonstrate -normality-, despite being anything but in private. So, if you have tohave one and only one, even if you don't want one, she might as well be the hottestone you can find, since that was the initial point for shooting for success to beginwith for most men, thanks to advertising and the like…As this trend continues you end up with rich ugly bitter deceitful men,married to beautiful young attractive women, who know nothing but how tomaintain being attractive, which of course becomes pointless as old age chewsaway at you, hence ugly old women in fur, getting skin treatments every week. This is further exacerbated since these unions are made public. It hasbecome a measure of success for a woman to find and marry a rich man, or simplyto be as sexy as possible, and for men it's a measure of success to find court andbed young attractive women, or to simply be as rich as possible.Furthermore, as rich men and pretty women take themselves out of themarket the value of those traits goes further up, encouraging more marriage anddriving the value still higher up, to the eventual point of nothing but them havingany market value. Also as that value rises the search for them heats up as well,resulting in more coverage, and those already committed to this arrangement willbe exposed to mates surpassing their own in looks and income, but since they arelocked in, they become bitter and turn on each other since they are robbed of anyhope of upgrade, or they cheat and divorce, both of which are absurdly common