Twin Opposing Vortexesand The Illusion of Pull

We have to redefine a lot of terminology and create new phrases to specify Northfrom South, Positive from Negative. We need new words for “gravity” and “light”.We need to discern the difference between Electric Thrust and Gravity.We need to Re-conceptualize old equations and develop new equations aroundnew concepts. As Dewey B Larson stated in his 1978 keynote address, the mathis correct, but conceptually the equations are all wrong.North doesn't necessarily mean up. South doesn't necessarily mean down.But there exists a dual energy always.For every inward thrust, there is a simultaneous outward thrust.Both are PUSHING motions. But the inward push is magnetism and the outwardpush is radiation. The inward pushing force SIMULATES gravity. (but it's not truegravity) Both magnetism and radiation are electricity.But those 2 parts of electricity are opposing forces.Radiation is the positive electricity and Magnetism is negative electricity.Can't have one without the other.Can't have positive without the negative, or male without female.It's a constant sexual and rhythmic balanced interchange.Walter Russell called it the Twin Opposing Vortexes.There is no nucleus to the center of our Galaxy. It's VOID of matter.Not some fallacious black hole made of matter so dense that all things areattracted to it. NO. There is no nucleus to a galaxy OR an atom.I have yet to see an actual picture or proof of the nucleus of an atom. All we seeare cartoon drawings and computer renderings. They can’t show you thenucleus of an atom because it doesn’t exist.They are trying to argue that the center of a hurricane has some invisible massso dense that the vortex around the Eye is being sucked into itself. Absurd!There is nothing in the center of the vortex, not micro, nor macro.When two people look at the same thing, one may see something completelyopposite the other.When one person observes a glowing circle, they could assume they are lookingat the silhouette of a solid sphere and base an entire system of math based uponthat illusion of observation. Another person could observe that same glowing

circle and see a ring or toroid. One person can see a solid ring while the othersees something traveling in a circle so fast that it’s creating the illusion of a solidring.Scientists are notorious for inventing equations to describe an illusion of observation that might not necessarily be accurate. One of the best examples isthe invention of the classic “black hole creating gravity so great that not evenlight can escape.”Why can’t they just accept nothingness for what it is? There is nothing in thecenter of a vortex. Stop making up rules and equations for “dark matter.” There’s just nothing there. It’s that simple…They think gravity is some pulling force from the center point (singularity).They have it backwards. All things are trying to push TO the center from theOutside In. Not pull from the inside out.They are looking at the inverse thrust of electricity which SIMULATES gravity.Gravity is the attraction to Light which = REST.They think light is the thing traveling 186,000 miles a second. NO.WE are traveling. WE are made of matter. All matter is already in motion.But science views matter as the stationary force and light as the moving thing.It's just not true.Gravity is the attraction to stillness.All things in motion seek to achieve a state of rest.But the irony of Man, is that we seek to achieve light by running faster and faster.That only adds more resistance and gets us farther from our goal.There is no speed of light. There is no nucleus to an atom.Opposites Don't attract. Nothing Ever travels in a straight line.These guys.... I'll tell ya. LOLc is only a constant because c = 0



There IS NO speed of light.



Light IS the stationary fulcrum by which + or - charged matter can even exist.



(“Be centered,” “Find balance.” )How can you square 0? E

≠

mc^2 in regards to classic understanding because crepresents the stationary Isness of Light. I don't know what they're currentlymeasuring with ‘c’ but it sure isn't the speed of absolute rest. Need to replace cwith something else, or change what c actually represents.