Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
First Causes and the Council of Light

First Causes and the Council of Light

Ratings: (0)|Views: 15|Likes:
Published by MarcusTanthony
What is the basis of reality?
What is the basis of reality?

More info:

Published by: MarcusTanthony on Jun 09, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/09/2011

pdf

text

original

 
First Causes and the Council of Light
 You can also read this article on
 www.22cplus.blogspot.com I’m a little busy this week preparing for an important job interview in Australia later inthe week, so I won’t be writing too much here for a while. I’ll get back to writing moreof 
 Light 
after that date.But here’s an interesting thought for the day. It is mentioned by Eldon Taylor in his book 
 Mind Programming
. It is this;First causes are not provable. A first cause is a foundational concept, principle or structure that one believes to be the basis of reality.
 
Marcus T. Anthony 
(PhD)Email: mindfutures at gmail dot com
 
Taylor is right, if you think about it. Mainstream dominant science begins with the firstcause that matter is the basis of the universe, and that it began from nothing via the BigBang (although this theory is being hotly debated at present). But how would oneactually prove that matter is the founding basis of reality? What experiment would oneconduct? The answer is that there is none. Thus the “matter is foundational” principle of science is actually metaphysics.In the Eastern idealist tradition, consciousness is believed to be the foundation of thecosmos, with matter being an emanation of cosmic mind. This is also metaphysics, inthat no experiment that I know if could prove it.One might then logically question how any foundational principle might be consideredmore correct or superior to another. What if I said Uri Geller created the universe whilein a particularly bad mood. There’s no way to prove or disprove that. With the scientiifc method, peer review essentially determines what “facts” are real ornot real. It’s the best system we have, given the current typical level of humanconsciousness evolution. However I believe that in time scientific peer review will evolvein to Wisdom Council review which incorporates other ways of knowing, includingdirect spiritual perception or Integrated Intelligence. This claim I make is in itself basedon personal perception, and from direct experience working with people with advancedlevels of consciousness. I have seen how decisions can be made via a collectiveemployment of Integrated Intelligence.The Wisdom Council will eventually happen, once the veneer of scientific materialism isstripped away, and begins to evolve into a more deeply conscious understanding of theuniverse and the humanity’s role within that universe.This Wisdom Council process will most likely go through various phases of evolution, asinitial attempts to work with such consciousness will inevitably be contaminated by theego projections of its members, and interference from external consciousness fields(individuals with malevolent intentions, collective consciousness fields, alien anddiscarnate influences. In my working with groups I have seen the way that theconsciousness fields of the individuals involved can become entangled. This is becausethere is almost nobody – least of all me – who is beyond some degree of influence fromthe power and control agenda of the ego. This agenda is what gets people ensnared inother people’s energy fields.I suspect that in time, whatever Wisdom councils forms will learn from the mistakesthat are made, and in turn will deepen in consciousness. Ultimately the “drama” will beminimised, and eventually completely eradicated. It will then become a true Council of Light. The Council will be able to form a kind of "peer review", helping humanity decidethe what realities and truths to pay heed to. By that point human beings will be far more"transparent" than they are now, and people will be able to sense lies and deceptionmore readily. So the chances of people giving their power away to the Council will beminimal. Still, it has to be admitted that the current "self-made man" culture of some
 
modern western nations will find this idea an affront to their dignity. Yes, it will involvea surrender to something greater than the self. This will be perceived as a loss of power by the ego, despite the fact that it is actually the opposite. All that however, is a long, long way off. I can’t prove any of it, and won’t try. You mightlike to consider all this a provocation – something to stir the imagination.Marcus
* * *
Books by Marcus T. Anthony (next page)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->