Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
18

18

Ratings: (0)|Views: 118|Likes:
Published by Aman Bhattarai

More info:

Published by: Aman Bhattarai on Jun 09, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/07/2014

pdf

text

original

 
4)
 
Should technology be used to choose the character of an unborn child?
(SA018)What if everybody different is same? Would you fear for your result if your success ispredetermined? Would you go for a hard work if you come to know that you are nevergoing to get more than your existing state? So then we must be knowledgeable enough torealize what can be the consequences if the man who creates science is himself created byscience. If science is used to choose the character of an unborn child then a child is born
 
who comes to be a man with no fear, no jealousy, no hope, no love , no hatred, no anger . Inaggregative we can say that a feeling less so called human that looks like a human is born.Birth is natural phenomenon where a parent can just wish his child to be like himimagination. But when it comes to the case where a parent can determine the being of thechild every parents try their best to fill the best character in the child. And in this run of being perfect they tend to lose the existence of the child that would be otherwise. Moreover in this case the child is nothing rather than a standardize mind of his parent. So he will
have the limited character that his parent’s wants or that is filled with in him. The symbols
like individuality and feeling that determine a body being with a soul is lost. So born childmay be brilliant that he can solve every chemistry every math, he may be an ideal son that obeys his parents and never does wrong, but his parents will always miss something.
parents then will miss the calling from the teacher for mischief’s his little child would have
 done, scolding him in his teen age for hanging hours and hours in phone, and most of allthey would miss his normal life.The life that could have been otherwise. Choosing a character not just affects the matter of 
 
psychology but engulfs each and every aspect of human life. For example from biologicalaspect like disorder in the process of meiosis, mitosis and mutation to the economical effect like fallacy between rich and poor. The difference between rich and poor is an obviouseffect that can be generalized like the rich will have all the good as they can chose the best 
character they need and poor will have all the pain as they can’t afford to the technology
Comment [T1]:
Generalization
Comment [T2]:
Wrong phrasing
 
like this. Hence this difference as we all know can bring a very great fluctuation to theexisting economy of the country as poor will get poorer and the rich will get richer.Moreover this may result to the devastating destruction to the life in the form of cold war
 
as then the world will have split into two halves of poor and rich. We cannot be sure that this technology is always used by the good people. What if Terrorist are its users. When ababy is born with a pre determined aim of blasting atom bomb and with a thirst of bloodand terror how can we aim for a secure world even if there are thousands of brilliant characterized children. When the world is divided into two powerful halves where one isgood and the other is bad, one is poor and the other is rich we can see the future of violenceand bloodshed revolving above our head. As proved by every theory, every science, and
 
every behavior like the law of interference of coherent out phase wave with equalamplitude which results in a dark fringe, like a chemistry where one mole of sodiumhydroxide totally neutralizes one mole of hydrochloric acid giving a neutral salt, like amatter colliding with a antimatter resulting a mass destruction and giving a zero, thesimilar goes with the case of human existence where a positive and negative feeling collideswith a great deal of energy that will result in a bare neutral and life less earth. Hence a final
 
result of characterizing a baby using science can be the end of the world. There is a lawbalancing every aspect of ecology. This law is like a spiritual force that binds each andevery organism of this earth into a certain niche, like the law of nature that gave elephant board feet so that it can cope up with its body, like a lizard that can change its color so that this small creature can secure itself. Similarly the law of human life that is some is made tobe brilliant and some are brilliantly made. Some are good and some are bad, this is just because to maintain the cosmopolitan group of the people with different character wherethey will have a life according to their character. So it is good to not change this law, as theecology of variety of species is better than the community of organisms having the same
species. More over we don’t want destruction, we don’t want to lose our human species for
a bunch of Roberts
, we don’t want a life without feelin
g, then why would we ever want to
 
characterize our children instead of being happy with whom they are. So conclusively it canbe said that we have a controlled, crucified and correct law that we give birth to our babies
Comment [T3]:
Good argument
Comment [T4]:
Generalization
Comment [T5]:
Not logically proven
Comment [T6]:
Derogative and informal, robotsis the correct word I guess

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->