Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
1Center or American Progress | Executive Reorganization
Executive Reorganization
Six Lessons from the 1970s
By Harrison Wellford,
1
Jitinder Kohli, and James Hairston June 2011
Introduction and summary
 In his January State o the Union speech, President Barack Obama promised toreorganize the executive branch.
2
He said the last major restructuring was in the “dayso black and white television,” reerring to Carter’s successul reorganization o ederalagencies. Te Center or American Progress joined Harrison Wellord, who led theCarter administration’s reorganization eort, to pinpoint key lessons the Obamaadministration should heed as it develops its detailed proposal.
 Whie House ocials are scheduled his week o presen he presiden wihrecommendaions or reorganizing he execuive branch o beter promoe a morecompeiive America. Te idea is no new. Presidenial aides in 1978 proposed heormaion o a “Deparmen o rade, echnology and Indusry.”Ta idea was never enaced, bu he adminisraion o hen-Presiden Jimmy Carer did oversee a large-scale and successul reorganizaion o governmen wihhe ormaion o he deparmens o energy and educaion, and comprehensivecivil service reorm.Reorganizing governmen agencies is no or he ain o hear. Like reducing hedeci, everyone is in avor o i in he absrac, bu is allure ades when presi-dens conron he winners and losers o change. Te iron law o reorganizaion isha he inensiy o a sakeholder’s ineres is oen inversely proporional o hesize o he sake a risk. No uni o governmen is so obscure or redundan ha anagency head or member o Congress will no soop o deend i. Srucural reor-ganizaions, in which agencies are eliminaed or shied on an organizaional char,are especially dicul.
1 Harrison Wellord, now chie executive ofcer o Wellord Energy Group in Washington, D.C., was executive associate directoro the Ofce o Management and Budget and led the President’s Reorganization Project under Jimmy Carter.2 On March 11, 2011, President Barack Obama issued a presidential memorandum directing that “Within 90 days rom the dateo this memorandum, the Chie Perormance Ofcer shall submit recommendations to me or presidential and, ultimately,congressional action to restructure and streamline Federal Government programs ocused on trade and competitiveness.” The 90 day deadline expires today.
 
2Center or American Progress | Executive Reorganization
Te las presiden o underake a reorganizaion o he ype Obama is conemplaing was Carer, who campaigned on he promise o cleaning up Washingon. Par o hispledge was o conduc a comprehensive reorganizaion o he execuive branch simi-lar o he one he did as Georgia’s governor rom 1971 o 1975. Carer’s “PresidenialReorganizaion Projec” was successul.Te Deparmen o Energy Organizaion Ac o 1977 creaed he Deparmen o Energy by bringing ogeher he Aomic Energy Commission, he Federal PowerCommission, and energy programs rom he deparmens o agriculure and heinerior. wo years laer, Carer’s proposal o orm a new Deparmen o Educaion was enaced by Congress. Lawmakers also agreed o 10 smaller reorganizaion plans,covering civil righs enorcemen, disaser assisance, and nuclear power regulaion,among oher areas. Carer also oversaw major civil service reorm including hecreaion o he Senior Execuive Service.Presiden Obama has made a similar promise o reorganize governmen, saying“We can’ win he uure wih a governmen o he pas.” In March he asked Jerey Ziens, he U.S. Chie Perormance Ocer, wih developing specic proposals orreorganizaion ocused on rade and compeiiveness. Specic recommendaions aredue o he presiden his week. As he Obama adminisraion shis gear rom developing proposals o geting hemenaced and implemened, he presiden should ake accoun o six lessons rom heCarer era:
•
Be crystal clear about reorganization’s goals.
Te more concree and policy-relaedhe beter.
•
Don’t underestimate the political capital required of the president.
He mus also beprepared o inves his personal ime o achieve a successul reorganizaion.
•
Be ready for the war within.
Te presiden mus spend as much ime selling his planinernally as he does o ouside groups. Cabine members and agency heads caredeeply abou ur and will gh hard o deend i.
•
Be ready for the war on the Hill.
Reorganizaions can only be enaced by Congress.Resisance is vehemen especially among lawmakers whose power base is hreaenedas commitee boundaries change.
•
Enlist external allies and understand foes.
Key rade organizaions, ineres groups,governors, and mayors wih a sake mus be idenied and brough on board, o pre-emp opposiion o he presiden’s plan.
•
Reorganization requires organization.
Tere is more o reorganizaion han he poliics.Tey are major organizaional change projecs and require a skilled eam o lead hem.Tere is one overarching ruh o reorganizaion ha underlies hese recommendaions:Reorganizaion mus ollow policy—no vice versa. Shuing boxes on an org char isno a subsiue or policy reorm. On he oher hand, a badly organized governmencan hold back implemenaion o good policy.
 
3Center or American Progress | Executive Reorganization
In he December CAP repor “ A Focus on Compeiiveness ,” John Podesa, Sarah Warell,and Jiinder Kohli argued ha he curren ragmenaion o responsibiliy or compeiive-ness policy made i dicul or he ederal governmen o successully implemen policieso promoe our uure prosperiy. We believe a beter policy ramework is needed and hagovernmen needs o be beter organized o implemen i.Te presiden’s reorganizaion iniiaive could se he sage or ha new ramework, andheeding lessons rom he Carer era will improve is chances o success.
Six lessons from the Carter era
Here are six broad lessons rom he Carer era ha he Obama reorganizaion eamshould keep in mind as i atemps o implemen is own major resrucuring o heexecuive branch.
Be crystal clear about reorganization’s goals
 A successul reorganizaion requires he presiden o se ou a compelling case or change.Carer campaigned on he need o make governmen more ecien, responsive, and accoun-able—and he relied on his rack record as governor o Georgia, where he had led a wholesaleresrucuring o he sae’s execuive branch. Each reorganizaion proposal rom he Careream specied deailed objecives in cos savings, accounabiliy, openness, and execuion.During he campaign, Carer promised he American people ha i eleced he would reducehe number o governmen agencies and commitees rom nearly 2,000 o 200. While hepromise o cu he number o agencies was compelling campaign rheoric, he Whie Houserealized aer he elecion ha i ied he presiden o a quesionable meric o success, so i was quiely abandoned aer he rs 100 days. Insead, he Whie House saw eliminaingagencies or overlapping uncions as a means owards beter governmen, no an end.o make a successul case or reorganizaion, he presiden has o convincingly answerhree quesions:
•
 Why is reorganizaion necessary righ now?
•
 Wha does reorganizaion seek o achieve?
•
 Wha will be he merics o success?Having a clear policy agenda or supporers o rally behind—be i compeiiveness, job cre-aion, deci reducion, or improving governmen perormance—is essenial o he successo reorganizaion. In he curren poliical and economic climae, he adminisraion will wano rame he benes o reorganizaion as saving money, creaing jobs, or boh.
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • More From This User

    Notes
    Load more