Professional Documents
Culture Documents
12123110 Page 1 of 15
3H TI':g CI.TITSS STATES T}TSITRIfrT C*I3S? rOR fltE se$"6ft:q l3srR3c" o" FEbI!{$SLVA}{IA
Pl"alrrtif f s,
\r.
ORLY
: :
:
i
:
: :
:
Hsl'lCRAl.ltUttt ElUnRSgf,
R*SRHN#' iI.
r.
IrfTRSDffiTf,OT{
Taitz's oral
Elartiest papers, r*viewed ehe dacumenlary evidrlrcs, and held a hea.riag on the matler <:rr Dcefilber ?0, ;0:"*. F*r th reas+ns set
farth b*}sr*, b$th rroti$ns *ri]-l be denied aud the C*ure #auLiorlg the pa.rtie*. eepeu*"alty the atstcrneys in the cese, ss bo ihe prosEleci $f futurs Eanctians.
rI.
r'ncruBl
strcKcRoultD
4, ?009, tslaintiffs Lina Li!:eri ("Liberi") , rhilip ,J, ISergi, Seq. (sserg"), the Latu Offj-ees of trhilip J. Berg,
On May
-a-
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 224-5 Filed 06/10/11 Page 2 of 15 Page ID #:6342 Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Filed 12123110 Page 2 of 15
& flxceL Gl<ebal {ccl"l.ecri-ve1y. "Flair:tLffs'} ini*iated rhi.s defas:ation, libel-, ar:d sla.nder actian agai:net Defeadant* $rly Tait*, Ssq.. *DS i"Ta-aLz"l, Defe:rd *u.r F.reedo$s Fgr,ind*tions, Irrc. ("DOFF"], Neil ,Sankey, The Sanhey Firm and Sankey Inveet"i.gat-lons, Inc. ic+ll"r*ctl"vely, !t$a:rhey"], Edgar l{gi,c, {aren Ha.ie, Flaing Radi*, KpRl.I AII 151-0, Bar It- Fars's, FLaine Ra*io Sletsr+?"k (ccllae*iv*ly. 'the Hales'), and ilnda $u* tse3cher {cot}e*tiveiy,
and *Defendants").1
In slrtn, sl.*intiffs ansl Defendantrs ere part of fihe *bi*th*ro Hx)ve$renl, *rhich ls ccurpriged *f lndividuafs who beU-eve that Pr*si**nE obama is ineligible to be President *f lhe {}nited StaLes because he was hoxn in Keaya. At one tirne, P}aint,iffs and Defendants worked foget'ber co atLempt to prove President Obama's ill*gitirna*y but inffght,ir:g a$orrg them led to this Laweuib. $pecifically, Plai:;tiff Phi),ip e*rg accr:sed **fer:*arrt srly Taita sf irrproperLy publishing lhe sacial secur*ty nurnber rrf his pa.ralegal., Lisa Lil:eri, along with defamatory information r:egarding t'ihert's pa*t history of criminal activity, $n her
Some of thss* Fsrfies have a Long and c*mptlc*ted ' liEigafion hintory. S*f, "#.,..9., Berg r{. QFam+, 585 F.sd ?34 (3d cir. 2009) ; S,hodes v. -Ula(}psnal^d, 6?fi F. $upp. 2d 1-363 {M"D" Ga. 2OO9) {impoeing $zCI,s00 *anction o!1 sounsel Or}y Taitz fr;r use of the 3.eg*.1 pro#es$ f*r an 5"mpr*per purl:*se], Aff 'S Rhpdes v. gae*+aald, ?slf fI.S. epp" tsxrs 5340 fJ.lth Cir. f{ar. 15, 2S10}. ?his lit.ig*ri+r} appeer$ ds be pare *f *kis overaSl di*p+** *{Itcrrg the p*rt'ie*"
-2-
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 224-5 Filed 06/10/11 Page 3 of 15 Page ID #:6343 Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Filed 12123110 Page 3 of 15
ryebei*e- llefend.a-*ts Sdg*r arrd Care* Hals, **d l{eil $ankey *r* eEeentialiy accused of workS^ng with $x' Taits to defanle
Fla.i"ntiffs.
Dr. Talt,a appeared. NeiI Sankey is a private inve*rigator in calif*rrria, atlege<3If hlred by *r. Taita *n h*r q**$t to *deslray' PSaintiff* Berg *n* Lib*rl'
Texas on which
rrr.
pR0cnnBRet
Brsfonr
on May 4, 20$9, Slaintiffs filed thelr complainl along w**h arr Erttergerrcy 1"1*ti*n far an Injr:nct*.*r: and,/or Tercp*rary Restrairring Order. Sn *t*y ?2, 2**9, *ef*ndsnts Niel Sarikey,
saxkey T:rvestigacior:s, an Saakey Investigflti+rrs. Inc, t"$axkey
?0Sg
resp*n*ed to lhese r**bi*ns. on Ju;:e 1.1, 2**9, Plaintitfs resp*nd*d to the l{*ii<>ns t$ trj-sfitiss fi}*d hy Sankey Fef,*ndfr{:fs,
filed their
Emergerrcy
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 224-5 Filed 06/10/11 Page 4 of 15 Page ID #:6344 Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Filed 12123110 Page 4 of 15
2*09, this Courh J"esrred ord,ers: {1) granEing P}aintJff ts motion and dismissing trefendanns #ames Sundguist a:rd Rock Salt Pul:lishing; (21 denying r,rithout
prejud.ic*r Plai.ntlff '* *wo X$ergency Flot.i*nE far an lnjur:*tio*r
of the f,ourr and LhaE Fertrie$ musr requege chifi by lett"*r ho the Court; ta) granting Defendant Taitz's lilotious to
Flaint,iff "s rnany req*esls f<rr dsfau3t juBg:*ents; *.*d {5i issui*g a ru}e to slrew *au** w}:y Lbe csrrtplaint should n*t be se'rered and trarrEferred. ofl July ??, 2009, based upon a leLt,er 6ent tc th* fourL by Slaintiffs, the eourt ordered that Fl"ainriff's new Em*rgency l{*t,ion f,cr ehe Isruance *f an Injuncti$R .sr Restraining Order be
Set. .h,side Defau}.t' .Iudgmunt anC denyirrg
3, eS09. ghs fisrrrt. lrel-* a tieari.ng sn.august 7, e0S3, ar:d denieel Flaintiff's mfiLl#n on August.lfi, 2frO9, as well aE denyi*g
other rnotlons,
Ot: August 1"4, 2*O9,
many
Plaintj.ffs app**led the Court,ts des"ial *f their n:ctie* fsr an injunctisn or reslraining nr**r t.o ihe fhir$ Circuit. fx, Ilecenber 9, 2Q&9, t.his ca.se was pi*.ced i-rr suspelrse pe::ding detsrminat:un of llre appeal. {gee da*, n$. S}.i On May 26, 2010, the Thlrd Circuit granted Flaintiffs. moti$n to
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 224-5 Filed 06/10/11 Page 5 of 15 Page ID #:6345 Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Filed 12123110 Page 5 of 15
'rrithdr*s their appeal-, p$rsllar:t, to Fed. R. App. P. 4?{b} . i+iberi '{. ?aitz, lik}- *9-34*3.
$ge
tln 'June 3, 20:.0, the Courl denied tl:e :mrti+ns t:o dismigs, &nd eeverad the act,ion and trangferred the claimg
each Sefendant's ho*e juri*d.i-ction.
On June
t,o
*l*intif
+ther bhings, thaL f,he Ccurt did not have jurisdicti+* ca.se- T*ilz's aFpeel l* cxrrentJy perrding.
F{eanr*hi3e, an $*pteudrer
in this
a Flefien to Request n$ru$ents Missing Fr*m an Inc*mplele rra"nncrip$. She also faxed to the Ccrurt many }engthy letters fii-e* rapon#es $rr the do*ket reiating ** statters *n appe;rI.. *n *ctohey ?9, 2S1C, lhe toarr *rdered tlrat 433 furaher :n*ki+ns an*
phan* calls be direct"*d to the Uniled Stet,ss Court +f Appe*Is for
to ltrie C*ure requeeting. far a third tisl*, a Ternparary Restrair:ing Order. Circuit. plaintiff
On **cernber
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 224-5 Filed 06/10/11 Page 6 of 15 Page ID #:6346 Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Filed 12123110 Page 6 of 15
PlaintiffE' prewior:* requast.s rrere by lettr t<: ihe C+urt, oxr secec*ber 13, 2s13, pur#*ane i<r the ?hj"r* tircgit's directir:n, ihi,c Car*rH scheduled a he*ring on Plaintiffs' moii+rr f*r De*ereber 20, 20I"S.
rv-
#xtRrg$:c*rolr
cliversiry of cicizenship" eB U.s.c. $ 1332. The. citiuenship of all parei.es is as foll.r;rwp, For t*he Ftainhif f s r Eerg and Liberi atre prr:ssylvania ciliz*:ns; Adaug ie an Gklahorsa citiz*n; *rrd Csle}l* and Gc Global ar* ditizexts af l'[sr* Jereay, Far
Befends*ts: Taitz, nQFf, anti sankey are citizens of C*Lif*rni*;
$at[ Publishirg are cit.ise::s oE ]isrrr J]rsey; and **l"cher and t.he Halsp are citizens of TexasSundEuict and Rock
v"
t#rr$rs
30R
On Fecemkr
f,+r a
Or<ler. Plaintiffs fhiltip Bergr Liea Liberi, a*d ,lisa Sstella ?sere preseni, 8arg, a member *f the penngySva*ia bar, r*pr*#ented all rf the P}*i.ntiffs, kfendant OrIy ?nit*. a member r"lf the Califarnia bar, wag aJ"so pre$ent,. TaiLz represented herself arrd Defend Our Freedoms Foundation. At the tmaring, the CEurt rcc*ived and adr,i-tt*d a nurnber of exhi.niLs
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 224-5 Filed 06/10/11 Page 7 of 15 Page ID #:6347 Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Filed 12123110 PageT of 15
ar':d hearcl
t*xti:tt*::y fr*m
i.tne**ea
Fl"aintif,fs argued that DefendanLs Orly Taitz and Linda Eel.*her- as srt13 as a thirC Frtsy, G*+ff Sf-aples. crsated a website. lrl,Lp;ilAisalib*fi,.**m, in retaSiation for their filing
an apFe.al in this case. The Frebsite i* set*up as if it
was
r,iheri dld not establi#h the website or give permi.oui"on to anyone lo estab].ich the *ebsite ir: ?:er r:ana*, Liberi f i:e* *n online *buse foxr* with ttre dsr*ain regislry ar:d aa onli*e abuse report with pfiV,fi.#.ypllotect,.arq. T&e dcma.in was originally reported uc) be regj.slered bo a Lisa tlberi of N*ir<:bi rvith an ema.ll addrees *f cer:victadfeLaaaliealiberi,ror&- As $f ftol;r, eh* t*sbsite iE aSlegediy xegf*tered t$ * S*off St*ple* of Te:*as. Flaintiffs further alleged f,haL taita. Seleher, and
$taples sent e*rails encouraging peopSe tc view lhe website.
fhese eerail* *ere senf, Lt: emeil adgrsss*s fou*d in l,ibesi'e +ld
email acc*untr
emaj-I tras from
siG
wauSd
believe tire
her. Flainuiffs alno allege thal when trhey tried bo ge: r*lj.ef via a letter e<r this Ceurl, the Sefendants f,etaSiaLe by p$st*:E tbe leiter cn li:s website, Defendant Taita recpo-ded trilet plai*t*ff* hEve sc
-7-
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 224-5 Filed 06/10/11 Page 8 of 15 Page ID #:6348 Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Filed 12123110 Page 8 of 15
b,he websit.e
ht*p:-lll,isalibefi,.,g"*m. Taitr further arg'r.red thaE anything posted ahaut Liberi on t.tre websiLe which is in lfaLta'fi conLrol.
truthful and l:,r:t elander*us ii.s:,iberi's *r$ugis}.dlt" asd *riiniral hist*ryi . Taitx furtber a).I*g*d that trl*ini.iffe are r*t*I5ating againsf, hsr f*r being a "whistle.blorter" about f-iheri' e crlminal hJ-gtory a*d involvenent
www-r.gg.lyEaitzEEq.c*SHB we.s
Plaintiffs' first witness was hisa Liberi. L,ib+ri tesuified that gh* rtid nct rreate the w*heite hitFjlll"aeaeibgf*i.**gglrt. *i* not arrthsrize its creati*n, and ha.s not 6e$t euails frcrm th* r*ebsiEe's eruail aec$unt c+f-rrri,ctedfe1oneLis.a.Lltserl.Cp_.m- Lj-beri alscr test.ified Lhel taitu tried to hire a "hj.t-man' ro hann her and her famj"Iy and that I'aitz has enccur;eg*d ctherg Lc harlfl her **:i- on crossexami**ti*n, Libert **sl*ed*S that sbe wag a *o*vicued felon axd that ch had no dj.r+ci *sidence l-ir:king th* r+ebsite to Fefe::d*xts Eel*her $r Taitu. Iri,berj. q.lso did rr+t prsssnL any cr*dible evidence to supporf her claims of murder solicitation arrd kidxapi::g attempts- nuring her testimcny, Liberi was often comba*ive a*d ev*.sirt&, arrd rauch cf hrer teet,imo*y t*as argnrment xitkol.rt factxil] basix, F{rr Lhese reasc:n#, *h* Courl f inds t}r** Iriberi's testiftony wag nol credi$ie. Plaintif,fo' *econd witness wafi Lia*. S#tel:a. Ostella
-8-
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 224-5 Filed 06/10/11 Page 9 of 15 Page ID #:6349 Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Filed 12123110 Page 9 of 15
testified
web
de*igner-
she
site, CIn sr$ss-xamina*.inn, OFtelSa *cr:ceded that she has ?+cked taitz +ul of her r*ebsiHe and htlr pssosiated paypal accounLs. Oste.Lla also concedad that she only had disc$v*rt* a link **t*reen eoff S*o,pl.ee and the w*bsite ilt--tJllll;i*91-j$egi' gp,tsi, rrdlb l,<> Defe:]dal:t* ?;ritc an* Fslcher. r,ike r.iberi, Ostella was efBen cambative and suasive during her testimony. and rnuch +f her testimony u/as &rgument with<put. factual baeis. Th*ffore, Lhe C*urt als+ f ind.s *h*t Ostella'$ teFt,i{tony ldas nol cs+dible, Defendant, Taitz called one witness, Plainliff Fhillip Berg. Berg t,estified regarding his previ.ous relationchip wittr Geatf St*ples. Lhat Staple* diri w+b d**ign fer BerE or* * v61':.rr!leer b*,ais, Elerg'* *est.iElorry was e1** comba.t{ve, svasive, and argtrmentative and tha Cour', did noe find his testinnny to be helpful for entabl-iehing a factual record.? At the conclusion of his dir*rcL examination by faitz, Berg asked Lo reep*n hls cas to call f*its etr Ehe stand, cihich tshe Court de:ried?he parties alsc offered various dccu::le*ts into
Tt,.e Csurt finds that tlle ttitn*gs' *.ostile reacticns tc ' lhe queelions asked rl:ra 5:artially triggered by ?aile^ ?aitz's guesl:ic,t:tc wsye confueing, hosCile, *"r:d *fL*n r*$i: to the level of baiting the *ritnesses.
-9-
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 224-5 Filed 06/10/11 Page 10 of 15 Page ID #:6350 Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Filed 12123110 Page 10 of 15
evidence. the Court ffnds nhat the documents l"aeked any evidence
dncuruentary
e.
is safi elciraordinary
remedy" and "should bs granted only ln limited circumstances.o Kos pharmacesgtqalp",. Inc- v" Andrx Csrp,, 369 F-3d 70o, 708 (3d
Cir, ?*fr4) {citing *rexicae__1e.1=__&*-5e1**-g*--s.. Fixnact * Csnsery.$ *A party .Pf*qgEgIB-- In., 42 F.3d 1421" 3.427 {3d Cir, 1994}t. *eekfng a prelirnisarg inju*ctio* rsust shcru: {3.} a Sikelihcod *f success +n the rn*rihei {2} tkat iL wil"} suffer irreparable harm if the injuncti$rr io denied," (3I Ehat granf,ing preliminary rell.ef will nat resulb in everr greater harm to tlre nonmoving party; and t4) [hat the pr"rb]iq int,erest fa-Lrors s*ch rel$.ef "- KgE .fhermece-sEi"ea1s, 35$ F.3 at ?OE icitiag 4Llggheay Enersv. InS"-. Y. ffiE* lse-*, 371- f'.}d 153, 15s {l* Cir. 1P9#}}. I* Lhis ras*, *tirher parly pr*vai)"s ;*xd neilher is the vi*tor. The C*urt will Seny bottr motiq:rts f*r a tearporary rertraining order for th+ reasons that f*llow.
F
- Pra1nti{tc.1.*bta.t@Es.$s.y
Firsb, Fl.ai*tiff* fail
Srts!
l<: sho?, thrf they a.ol'rld fik*ly
-1"0-
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 224-5 Filed 06/10/11 Page 11 of 15 Page ID #:6351 Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Ftled 12123110 Page 11 of 15
succ*ed {::: the merit*- Th* evidence Fr<lf fr*r*d by the ?l*!r:tiffs,
*s S**rnents and as t*i"tness test.irn**y. $a# notr f**nd *s) be sredibl* or reliabie. SLaintiffs failed Co prove that named Defendants Taitz and Bel.cher were dJ"rectJ"y connected to the
bs,eh
'*ehsit*.
Plaintif fs provided r+as an unsr.rbst,antialed aSlega*icn tlrat one Ge*ff Staples, reporteSly t-he cparrrt*r of the webeit*, h*d a previou* rel.alionship rtit;h S*rg
The orrly svidsnce
thaf Uhey wnuj-d suffe:: *rreparable hs,r:a unl*ss the Csurt *:*re t+ issrl@ a Ee{apsrery Reetra.ining *rd*r.'the r.r*h**.i*, htgp#JiEgg:j&*.9..i t is r:q: lernger avalLa3:L tcr t,he pubiic. Additionally, z:k*, all*gations Ehat Tails hired a hib-man and attempted tcr kidnap OsteLla's children wers not proven by any credible evidence. As Ptaiaiiffs' BKlt.ian faits ::nder Lhe first and *ec+nd pr*ags, t.h* Cc*rt rsill not *onciatre the an*lysis ss thi* *s a conjunctive tesE. T'!:uB, Flaint.iffs- l,totf*n for an- Ernekgentry temporary ResEraining Srder will tre denied.
show
Lto:lCI*i!
ry EALt#js- Hp ! i qs._{qs-srLsne rq e-nsy, Tqmp$r arv S+gtraJ.ning or*g; trr.rring Eh* hearing, $efenriarit ?*.itz ar:gued rF:at i* is the Plai"nbif,f,s EhaE ars engagerl in harassing irer and t'hat tt is she Lhat needs protecLion from them- Th eourt wj-ll treat this
e"
"
-?e t
e.Bd-a;:L..fi r
-1:.-
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 224-5 Filed 06/10/11 Page 12 of 15 Page ID #:6352 case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Filed 1212311A Page 12 of 15
agai::*l FLairreiffs.
deni*d.
eiJ"s*
b*
shord
on thcs me1:its. Taitx *nlleges that FlainLiffs are c+ntinuing ts bring a*Li*rrs agai:as* h*r l-rr retaliati<*x clf her exer*i** +f her
fre* speecl': :'ights b* "hl"*tl the r*h!*tl** *ci Plair:*iffs inpropriehy {j..e, { Berg l**ting l,iberir a *Glllricted f*}qrn, hasdle ilonaBionsl. However, th* C#urt finds that raitz did not affer cx+dibt* svides:ce f,+ e$tahltsh Ehal ghe fs likely t+ *utceied ia
cha cls"itn-
t'c
s?:sw
fitigate
is a *#nju$*tir.e te*tTemtr)orery
B*t c{i:}ti:r** Ltr* analy*i* es *hi$ Thus, Defenfls$t Sf,Iy f,aiLr"s FI$Li*n fsr
Restraining' Order r,rill be denied. rO TSIS *$$H3' S SBSSR 1*O SGVER Jl*ltr
vI "
F#X,JtTX#bt
t1RNqSS'HIr
3, ?*t*' lhe C$l}rt #sv*ftd thisr s*ti*?: an* tranef,err*d the +Iain* t+ *ach Def**clartt'r hom* jur*sdic*i"*r:, decisi*n pending app*41". ?he parties/ a*t.it1ns and argurnnnt
stn Jr-rae
*l
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 224-5 Filed 06/10/11 Page 13 of 15 Page ID #:6353 Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Filed 12123110 Page 13 of 15
#uElp$xus
ri:i* C{}tlrt's
Frior to the pcheduled tr*arinE multiple S*fendants {sther thar: *,i?* Eefg-faJ"tx S:arbiee} **ntacLei Lhe ft:ff.rt E* *lrpr*ss eha* i.* trt+ulC b* *** erqlerisiv* frnd inc*nv*t?*"*nt ta
tnake
it t{i a hearing in Pennsylvarria thau was schedul*d. wlthin five days. Theee *ori{ier:is adrl weight L+ t"}re f,*:urth "pr*vate facLsr# *rticlrlat*d by the Thlrd f,i"rcuit irr c+nsidering a transfer,- the*, 3s, th* #+*v*ni*r:ce of th* Fa.sties *s ixrdicaied by th*lr relaeirre phyeical and f fnancial condi-kians, Sse il}tUere_*:e.**$.l;a.te_"He.rml$#* k"-, 55 F.3d #?3, 879 {3d fir.
guidanee
f99S}.
in irs ilrder sn Se+*ftber iL4/ **1S {doc" }:#, 158}, a num.ber of, prtr *le fiefendants were ++nr:erfled that thefr failure to atiend w*r:ld prejr:dice ti:sir g:ositI-a**. Ti:e q1*ar #iffere*{:
belween tfu* S*sg-Taitz 4iJsput+ a::d the +*her De.ferrde;rls sulvpar*#
tha need E$ saver th cass# ss thaE pnrt.ies are n#t f*rceri t+ fly
&cro#s [he csl*ntry at the ]-aet minr.rt* t* be pra.rent f*r an issue tha; is j.rrsls?farre ts fh*ffi. :sdee*, P1*.1"n*,iffs' bkrergency $aei{}r}
for a Te:npsrfiry Restraining *rder r:n.Ly xequesled reti*f frorn gur$ #f the tr*el"vfl rsmaining fief endants.
T* ih* *xtertf, th*t tlre=e ic * lccus i-* tki* crazy qxi3t, *f clailrrs a:t* #r*ss claims betr+een Serg a-nd Taita, ifl
Es
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 224-5 Filed 06/10/11 Page 14 of 15 Page ID #:6354 Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Document 160 Filed 12123110 Page 14 of 15
VTI, EEEBVIOR
OF
fffi
F;N*fIES
thet $anctl-ous mey be or**r*d urrder Rul*e 1}-' 28 U.S.C- $ l9A?' arrd th* inherent power *f the CourE, $e,S i$,"r* {endaqt *CIrp-,, ?60 F. 3d 183, 1ee (3d cir . ?00L ) (cif ing C.hashg.s,E*g,- NASgO-*Jng' , scL u,s. 32. 43-,qI4 (19$1) {'The SuFreme f+urt recenely reAff irmed bh** a disurict r+r* ha* inherent authori*y ts impose s*ncfi{}}:'$ $Xlon ihase wha r"'+r.il* ahuse the judicial pr*eees-o] ?he fcu:rt ha* been Fatient i* deali'ng with these eftotisnal issues but th{: ;:arties continue to $*E closer to ths line of improper conducL. For e:{ar$P}e: f.hey csnginue Eo speak over each other in court; object dtlring *r*:ther artor:nsy's argn.rln*ni,; and interrapt and arg?re vritlr witn*s*es.
Addili*,nal3y, ver:/ segia*E a.ccux*t,isns lrsre if:ade *rrring this hearing, such ss: ths hirirrg cf a hit*r*an ho kill a party, the stealing a party's donatlon trrnde, and atbernptinE to kidnap chil^d cf one of the parfy's Lo the lawssir. ?he court r,tlilla
re*lnd the lasryers *}ras Lhey 'irere *,ra,rned by the Court thal n*akirrg st:ch s*rious acclusatior:s htithaut pr$$f f,* l:ac3E them up c+uld result in Llreir seferral to the diecipli,nary b'oard. fhere yrere n$ hiinners aL the krearing but eurely fhere
-14-
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 224-5 Filed 06/10/11 Page 15 of 15 Page ID #:6355 Case 2:09-cv-01898-ER Doeument 160 Filed 1212311O Page 15 of 15
rlias .#ne
l*ser - the s*arch ft>r tr:ith in an a:lvir+rxnerrh CIf dec*r*xt- F*r tLis si=ruy *p$,*+de, b+th raita a::d aerg h*sr *f th*
b}"*me.
eru*]3
IrIIT "
CffiCTfi'SIqH
F*r the rs*.F<:r:s s*rted ab*se. bcth Flaintiffs, Eanrgency $tr*iaa f*r a ?w6nrary A*Ferai-$ir:E *r*er a$d sefesrdar:t f*itz'n *ral3 Ftoti*n f+r a Temp*rary Re**.ral"r:ing order siSL b+ denied. Anl appropriate order tlri}l follow.
- 15-