Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
16Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
In collusion with corrupt attorneys USCA1 corrupt staff take disabled litigant's $450.00, block the Writ from any judge & manipulate docket 8 days after bogus judgment

In collusion with corrupt attorneys USCA1 corrupt staff take disabled litigant's $450.00, block the Writ from any judge & manipulate docket 8 days after bogus judgment

Ratings: (0)|Views: 705|Likes:
Published by tired_of_corruption
NO OPINION - NOT POSTED ON THE 1ST CIRCUIT COURT of APPEALS WEB SITE! WHY? BECAUSE IT IS A BOGUS RULING TO COVER CORRUPT ATTORNEYS AND CORRUPT COURT STAFF! WHO WAS THE CORRUPT STAFF ATTORNEY THAT SIGNED THREE APPEALS COURT JUDGE'S NAMES AND FILED THE DENIAL IS THE QUESTION THAT NEEDS TO BE ASKED!! Racketeering in our federal courts and fraud with the electronic filing system!! Nothing, absolutely nothing can be trusted as an actual judgment by an honorable judge that comes from courts with electronic filing where any staff can type a judge’s name--hell they even forge actual signatures---our justice system is a joke!! “We the People” are slaves to corrupt public servants! We support our own oppression; we pay these usurpers of the law with our tax dollars!! Significant tyranny is our future! America now the land of the corrupt instead of the free! America exists only for the benefit of the corrupt elite who control a corrupt government!
NO OPINION - NOT POSTED ON THE 1ST CIRCUIT COURT of APPEALS WEB SITE! WHY? BECAUSE IT IS A BOGUS RULING TO COVER CORRUPT ATTORNEYS AND CORRUPT COURT STAFF! WHO WAS THE CORRUPT STAFF ATTORNEY THAT SIGNED THREE APPEALS COURT JUDGE'S NAMES AND FILED THE DENIAL IS THE QUESTION THAT NEEDS TO BE ASKED!! Racketeering in our federal courts and fraud with the electronic filing system!! Nothing, absolutely nothing can be trusted as an actual judgment by an honorable judge that comes from courts with electronic filing where any staff can type a judge’s name--hell they even forge actual signatures---our justice system is a joke!! “We the People” are slaves to corrupt public servants! We support our own oppression; we pay these usurpers of the law with our tax dollars!! Significant tyranny is our future! America now the land of the corrupt instead of the free! America exists only for the benefit of the corrupt elite who control a corrupt government!

More info:

Published by: tired_of_corruption on Jun 12, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

04/29/2015

pdf

text

original

 
1
MY Petition by any legitimate judicial reading of an EXTRAORDINARYWRIT that I filed on June 10, 2011 with the First Circuit of Appeals wasbased on the Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2004 ("CVRA" or "the Act"),18 U.S.C. § 3771 and unarguable usurpation. The case docket had no judicial panel assigned through June 20
th
 
when a decision “DENIED”
without an opinion was posted on the docket. The docket now has aJune 13
th
entry that states there was a judicial panel assigned. TheUSCA1 corrupt staff blocked the WRIT from the Judges, stole my$450.00, and access to the case through PACER was manipulated so
that the case could not be accessed by any party’s name and only by
case number 11-1668 (as of 9/22/2011 I discovered you could no longeraccess the case unless you did the search with only the case number).On 1/27/2011 PACER DENIED any case access change; I was told by thePACER agent that he was able to access the case with party search. Iwas unable to access the case through party search until late afternoonon 9/28/2011.
 On the morning of 9/28/2011, I sent an Email to PACER and theSenate Judiciary Committee
with PDF’s showing my multiple access
attempts using party name which continued to retrieve only the
message “NO RECORDS FOUND”
. I stated that the change in case
access was in violation of the public’s right to court records
(peoplesearch most often by party name to get the case number) andrequested that I be informed as to whom requested the change inhow the case could be accessed and a statement of legal basis (thereis absolutely no legal basis) for the change. Late afternoon on9/28/2011 I received an email from a PACER agent showing me thathe was in fact able to access the case by party name; I then searchedby party name and the alteration in access had been remedied;
 
2
however, I received no information as to how, why and under who’
sauthority the change in access occurred which was validated bymultiple files I created from direct downloads of the PACER search
pages that showed “NO RECORDS FOUND”.
Example:
 
3
18 U.S.C. § 3771. Crime victims' rights(3) MOTION FOR RELIEF AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS.--The rights described in subsection(a) shall be asserted in the district court in which a defendant is being prosecuted for the crimeor, if no prosecution is underway, in the district court in the district in which the crime occurred.The district court shall take up and decide any motion asserting a victim's right forthwith. If thedistrict court denies the relief sought, the movant may petition the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus. The court of appeals may issue the writ on the order of a single judge pursuant tocircuit rule or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The court of appeals shall take up anddecide such application forthwith
within 72 hours
after the petition has been filed
. In no eventshall proceedings be stayed or subject to a continuance of more than five days
for purposesof enforcing this chapter.
If the court of appeals denies the relief sought, the reasons for the
denial shall be clearly stated on the record in a written
 
opinion.
 
One of my statements for relief requested in my motion for judicial reassignment (Dkt.#69) of, both, the Magistrate and the US District Judge was protection from further
 
conspiracy. Magistrate
Judge Sorokin “DENIED” this motion with Docket Text and
 
terminated the motion from the docket so that the US District Judge would never see it. Myfilings with the US District Court allege that I am a crime victim with supporting evidencebefore I was aware of court staff involvement and after I was aware of court staff involvement; my motions for contempt that implicated court staff were blocked and neverreceived any due process.
 The docket I down loaded from USCA1 on June 20, 2011 was still without a case assignment.The Decision was filed by the court on June 20, 2011 by
George Kretas case manager.
DENIED
WITHOUT AN OPINION
06/20/2011
1 pg, 33.49 KB
 JUDGMENT entered by Sandra L. Lynch, Chief Appellate Judge;Kermit V. Lipez, Appellate Judge and Jeffrey R. Howard, AppellateJudge. Denied. [11-1668] (GK)
In case you are not up to date on this case Sandra L. Lynch is also theundersigned on the bogus judicial misconduct order I received on May18, 2011. Florence Pagano of the circuit executive office was theattorney who was charged with looking into my allegations of misconduct; Pagano is well aware that the case was under usurpationand I believe the bogus first order is forged. I believe there are other

Activity (16)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
Colleen MH liked this
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
tired_of_corruption added this note
WHO WAS THE CORRUPT STAFF ATTORNEY THAT SIGNED THREE APPEALS COURT JUDGE'S NAMES, FILED DENIED WITHOUT AN OPINION AND ASSISTED CORRUPT JACKSON LEWIS ATTORNEYS, GUY P. TULLY AND BRIAN M. CHILDS OBSTRUCT JUSTICE?? Answer Now Revealed!!! (SBT) Stephen Bryce Turner—law clerk first circuit
tired_of_corruption added this note
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES N. Orders and Judgments 3. A judge, or deputy clerk, if appropriate, may grant routine orders by a text-only entry upon the docket entitled “Electronic Order”. In such cases, no PDF document will issue; the text-only entry shall constitute the court's only order on the matter and counsel will receive a system generated NEF.
tired_of_corruption added this note
First Circuit of Appeals Court extorts $450.00 from disabled litigant by carrying pretense litigation from the Us District Court of Massachusetts. Any competent staff attorney and certainly the Judges of the 1st Circuit knew this was a simulated litigation by the docket itself where there was never an appearance by any attorney & electronic orders by the docket clerk not a judge or deputy clerk.
tired_of_corruption added this note
The US District Court of Massachusetts is allowing Pretense Litigation to dispose of cases in a most unjust manner. The Clerk of the Court is aware and has taken no action. This is not an allegation of misconduct--this is misconduct validated by the court records themselves. Attorneys who have not
tired_of_corruption added this note
made a notice of appearance have been allowed to proceed in the representation of their clients who have no defense to their illegal discrimination and violation of other MGL forcing an in forma pauperis disabled pro se litigant to file document after document exposing multiple frauds upon the court and assert her constitutional right to be heard before the court as well as due process.
tired_of_corruption added this note
An example of the bogus orders coming from this court is this pro se litigant was prohibited from referencing the docket. The pro se litigant lives in Washington State and was in Massachusetts because her father had died; she paid her $450.00 to the first circuit and filed an extraordinary writ requesting that the US District Court allow her to appear before a US District Judge regarding a
tired_of_corruption added this note
pending contempt recommended by a Magistrate that the unauthorized Defense Attorneys moved for basing the language of their motion on fabricated memorandum from the court. The appeals court without an opinion denied the Plaintiff’s writ contrary to authority establish in the first circuit itself. Without any opportunity to appear before the court her case was then dismissed with prejudice.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->