NATIONAL FATHER’S DAYMESSAGE
TO: ALL PARENTING/CHILD ADVOCATESFROM: PARENTING RIGHTS INSTITUTE ANDNATIONAL LEAGUE OF FATHERS, INC.RE: PARENTING RIGHTS CONVENTION REPORTLITIGATION UPDATEDATE: JUNE 10, 2011As promised at our national Parenting Rights Convention held in upstate New York on April 15-17, 2011, a Report has now been completed for review by attendees, supporters and variousgovernment agencies. Issued in the form of a formal “Complaint” filed this morning with the New York Commission on Judicial Conduct, copies are being furnished to the U.S. JusticeDepartment, United Nations, legislative leaders and various human rights organizations. Weexpect to complete this process on June 17, 2011 in Washington D.C. (Father’s Day weekend).A copy of the 25 page “Complaint” is available for viewing atwww.leonkoziol.com. Copies arealso being sent to our followers. It incorporates the testimony and contributions of those whoattended the April convention. However, names and personal details were excluded to protect the participants from retaliation in their private litigation. Instead civil rights advocate Leon Koziol,J.D. employed his own experiences with references and recommendations common to “similarlysituated parents”. The Complaint easily shows why reform is not going to occur from within.This “Complaint” has immense practical value as a free information product for those victimized by domestic relations courts around the country. We parents are experiencing an epidemic instate control practices over our private affairs and exploitation of innocent children for profit.This document should be shared everywhere as a personal defense resource. It can be used to better understand the Family Court environment and as a tool for evaluating the performance of costly legal representation. In addition, it may serve as a background piece for seminars and public assemblies given the complex nature of these court processes. If this Complaint can save a parent-child relationship from abuse or demise, it will be well worth the sacrifice made by itsauthor and sponsor. You may contact Mr. Koziol personally for this purpose at (315) 796-4000.On a related note, a 25 page opinion was handed down in federal court in a case filed by LeonKoziol on behalf of “parents similarly situated” in “Parent v State” and its consolidated member case “Koziol v Lippman”. Originally filed on February 26, 2009, this challenge to abusivecustody and support laws was held up for two years on a court issued ruling which raised the
Rooker-Feldman doctrine as a bar to federal court jurisdiction. Younger abstention was alsoraised, among other obstacles, by the many law firms defending this action.Although the claims were dismissed, the jurisdiction obstacles were overcome. Unlike countlessother challenges around the country, this court took jurisdiction over the state court issues, givingothers a precedent for accessing federal court to raise constitutional questions. The adversecomponents of this ruling are now being appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York City. A show cause motion is expected on Friday, June 17, 2011. We will keep you informed asyou remain cognizant of the uphill battle we face. To put this in perspective, father’s rights casesfeature a 100% failure rate in our nation’s history. Then, in the usual manner, our politicianswonder why we face so much father absence and moral decline in Father’s Day speeches.
Office of Leon R. Koziol
1518 Genesee StreetUtica, NY 13502
(315) 796-4000June 9, 2011
COMPLAINT
State of New York Commission on Judicial ConductCorning Tower Suite 2301Empire State PlazaAlbany, NY 12223Re: Chief Judge Jonathan LippmanAppellate Division Justices, Third and FourthFamily Court Judge Michelle Pirro-BaileyFamily Court Judge Martha Walsh-HoodSupreme Court Judge Michael DaleyDear Commission:This Complaint is asserted in connection with ongoing sex discriminatory in New York’sUnified Court System, invidious judge refusals to comply with established laws, and judicialretaliation for the exercise of protected activities. Widespread harm to families and communitiescaused by needless court disputes is a major focus of this document and reform effort.Until I took up a public cause to promote parenting rights in New York’s domestic relationscourts, I enjoyed 23 unblemished years as a civil rights attorney. I secured six figure recoveriesfor victims of government abuse, ran as an endorsed candidate for state Senate and obtained afinal judgment in state Supreme Court declaring the largest casino in New York unconstitutional.My public interest work over the years has been featured on the CBS program 60 Minutes, CNNand multiple editions of the New York Times. What follows is a compelling story which may becompared to the plight of Gao Zhisheng, the Chinese lawyer stripped of his law license, basicliberties and child contact as a result of his representation of Christian groups and publiccriticisms of a communist government.In November, 2007, I began a process of representing parenting groups and victims of discrimination in New York’s Family Court. I publicly criticized unethical lawyer practiceswhich caused parents to fight over their own offspring. I also promoted shared parentinginitiatives and equal rights for fathers. Shortly afterwards, I was deprived of my law license,
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
More From This User
Notes
Load more
