Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
7.Rem Suggested Answers (1997-2006), Cracked, Word

7.Rem Suggested Answers (1997-2006), Cracked, Word

Ratings: (0)|Views: 343|Likes:
Published by Sui

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: Sui on Jun 14, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/09/2013

pdf

text

original

 
ANSWERS TO BAR
Remedial Law Bar Examination Q & A (1997-2006
)
 by
: sirdondee@gmail.com
Page
1
of 
66
EXAMINATION QUESTIONS
IN
REMEDIAL LAW
ARRANGED BY TOPIC(1997
 –
2006)
Edited and Arranged by:
 version 1987-2003
Silliman University Collegeof Law Batch 2005
UPDATED BY:
Dondee
The RE-Take 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATIONQUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & Philippine Law Schools Association 2006July 22, 2007 
 
Remedial Law Bar Examination Q & A (1997-2006
)
 by
: sirdondee@gmail.com
Page
2
of 
66
FORWARD
This work is not intended for sale or commerce. This work isfreeware. It may be freely copied and distributed. It is primarily intended for all those who desire to have a deeper understanding othe issues touched by the Philippine Bar Examinations and its trend.It is specially intended for law students from the provinces who, very often, are recipients of deliberately distorted notes from otherunscrupulous law schools and students. Share to others this work and you will be richly rewarded by God in heaven. It is also very good karma. We would like to seek the indulgence of the reader for some BarQuestions which are improperly classified under a topic and forsome topics which are improperly or ignorantly phrased, for theauthors are just Bar Reviewees who have prepared this work whilereviewing for the Bar Exams under time constraints and within their
limited knowledge of the law. We would like to seek the reader’s
indulgence for a lot of typographical errors in this work.The AuthorsJuly 26, 2005Updated by DondeeJuly 22, 2007
 
Remedial Law Bar Examination Q & A (1997-2006
)
 by
: sirdondee@gmail.com
Page
3
of 
66
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
........................................................................................................................................ 8
Bar by Prior Judgment vs. Conclusiveness of Judgment (1997)
.............................................................................. 8
Cause of action vs. Action (1997)
............................................................................................................................ 8
Civil Actions vs. Special Proceedings (1998)
........................................................................................................... 8
Conciliation Proceedings; Katarungang Pambarangay vs. Pre-Trial Conference (1999)
........................................... 8
Family Courts Act (2001)
......................................................................................................................................... 8
Interlocutory Order (2006)
....................................................................................................................................... 8
Judgment vs. Opinion of the Court (2006)
................................................................................................................ 8
Judicial Autonomy & Impartiality (2003)
.................................................................................................................. 8
Katarungang Pambarangay; Objective (1999)
.......................................................................................................... 9
Liberal Construction; Rules of Court (1998)
............................................................................................................. 9
Remedial Law in Phil. System of Gov’t (2006)
.......................................................................................................... 9
Remedial Law vs. Substantive Law (2006)
............................................................................................................... 9
Remedial Law; Concept (2006)
................................................................................................................................ 9
Rights of the Accused; Validity; HIV Test (2005)
...................................................................................................... 9
JURISDICTION
....................................................................................................................................................... 10
Jurisdiction (1997)
................................................................................................................................................. 10
Jurisdiction vs. Venue (2006)
................................................................................................................................. 10
Jurisdiction; CTA Division vs. CTA En Banc (2006)
............................................................................................... 10
Jurisdiction; Incapable of Pecuniary Estimation (2000)
.......................................................................................... 10
Jurisdiction; Incapable of Pecuniary Estimation (2000)
.......................................................................................... 11
Jurisdiction; Incapable of Pecuniary Estimation (2003)
.......................................................................................... 11
Jurisdiction; MTC (2002)
........................................................................................................................................ 11
Jurisdiction; Office of the Solicitor General (2006)
................................................................................................. 11
Jurisdiction; Ombudsman Case Decisions (2006)
.................................................................................................. 12
Jurisdiction; Probate (2001)
................................................................................................................................... 12
Jurisdiction; RTC (2002)
........................................................................................................................................ 12
Jurisdiction; Subdivision Homeowner (2006)
......................................................................................................... 12
Katarungang Pambarangay; Lupon; Extent of Authority; (2001)
............................................................................ 13
CIVIL PROCEDURE
.............................................................................................................................................. 13
 Actions; Cause of Action vs. Action (1999)
............................................................................................................ 13
 Actions; Cause of Action; Joinder & Splitting (1998)
............................................................................................. 13
 Actions; Cause of Action; Joinder of Action (1999)
................................................................................................ 13
 Actions; Cause of Action; Joinder of Action (2005)
................................................................................................ 13
 Actions; Cause of Action; Splitting (1999)
............................................................................................................. 14
 Actions; Cause of Action; Splitting (2005)
............................................................................................................. 14
 Actions; Cause of Actions; Motion to Dismiss; bar by prior judgment (2002)
.........................................................14
 Actions; Counterclaim (2002)
................................................................................................................................14
 Actions; Counterclaim vs. Crossclaim (1999)
.........................................................................................................15
 Actions; Cross-Claims; Third Party Claims (1997)
.................................................................................................15
 Actions; Derivative Suit vs. Class Suit (2005)
.........................................................................................................16 
 Actions; Filing; Civil Actions & Criminal Action (2005)
...........................................................................................16 
 Actions; Intervention; Requisites (2000)
................................................................................................................16 
 Actions; Real Actions & Personal Actions (2006)
...................................................................................................16 
 Actions; Survives Death of the Defendant (2000)
...................................................................................................16 
 Appeals; Period of Appeal; Fresh Period Rule (2003)
.............................................................................................17 
Certiorari; Mode of Certiorari (2006)
......................................................................................................................17 
Certiorari; Rule 45 vs. Rule 65 (1998)
.....................................................................................................................17 
Certiorari; Rule 45 vs. Rule 65 (2005)
.....................................................................................................................18
Contempt; Death of a Party; Effect (1998)
..............................................................................................................18
Default (2000)
........................................................................................................................................................18
Default (2001)
........................................................................................................................................................18
Default; Order of Default; Effects (1999)
................................................................................................................18
Default; Remedies; Party Declared in Default (1998)
..............................................................................................19

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->