Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
2011-06-20 Impeachments Investigation of Judge John Walter, Magistrate Carla Woehrle, Clerk Terry Nafisi, and others in the US District Court, Central District of California, in re:Fine v State Bar (2:10-cv-00048) s

2011-06-20 Impeachments Investigation of Judge John Walter, Magistrate Carla Woehrle, Clerk Terry Nafisi, and others in the US District Court, Central District of California, in re:Fine v State Bar (2:10-cv-00048) s

Ratings: (0)|Views: 139|Likes:
Executive Summary
Los Angeles, June 20 – Joseph Zernik, PhD, and Human Rights Alert (NGO) filed complaint with the US Congress and with the US Attorney Office, Los Angeles, against US Judge JOHN WALTER, US Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE, Clerk of the Court TERRY NAFISI, and others in ht US District Court, Central District of California, alleging public corruption through the conduct of simulated litigation in Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al (2:10-cv-00048).
Dr Zernik has gained substantial experience in analyzing fraud in state and US court records in recent years. His opinions were repeatedly supported by highly reputed experts.
Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al originated in Fine’s complaint pursuant to Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law (42 US §1983), alleging the circumstances, where California Judges illegally conspired against him at the behest of the State Bar officials, Los Angeles County government officials, and lawyers for the developers, who opposed him in the courtroom.
However, the affair as a whole should be deemed part of the intimidation, harassment, and retaliation against the former US prosecutor Richard Fine. Following his protest of the corruption of California judges, he was held in solitary confinement for 18 months, starting March 2009, with no warrant ever issued, and no judgment/conviction or sentencing ever entered in his case.
A pattern of false and deliberately misleading court records is found in the case of Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al (2:10-cv-00048):
· Clerk of the Court TERRY NAFISI refuses to certify any of the PACER dockets of the court;
· No valid summonses are found in the docket, in alleged violation of Duties of the Clerk pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
· No Civil Cover Sheet is found in the docket, which is required for the opening of a civil docket;
· No valid Assignment Order for Judge JOHN WALTER is found in the docket;
· No valid Referral Order for Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE is found in the docket;
· Numerous entries in the docket are by Ms DONNA THOMAS, who upon information and belief is not a Deputy Clerk, and Clerk of the Court TERRY NAFISI has denied numerous requests to confirm or deny DONNA THOMAS’s authority as a Deputy Clerk;
· The Clerk of the Court routinely denies access to the electronic authentication records (NEFs – Notices of Electronic Filing), and in similar cases, where the same persons were accused, all NEFs were eventually discovered to be invalid;
· Attorney KEVIN MCCORMICK, who appears in this case on behalf of the Defendants, falsely appeared on behalf of related defendants in a related case, with no authority at all, and
· No declaration or any other record signed by any of the Defendants is found in the pleading filed on their behalf, consistent with conduct of simulated litigation, and appearance by an unauthorized attorney.
The case should be deemed of the highest public policy significance, since it holds at bay the prospect of any honest court services in Los Angeles County, in particular, and in California, in general. Of note, the 2010 official Staff Report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations referred to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California".
The case also reflects the fraud inherent in the design and operation of PACER and CM/ECF, the public access and case management systems of the US courts.
The complaint was copied to the US Congress Judiciary Committees and the Human Rights Council of the United Nations.
Executive Summary
Los Angeles, June 20 – Joseph Zernik, PhD, and Human Rights Alert (NGO) filed complaint with the US Congress and with the US Attorney Office, Los Angeles, against US Judge JOHN WALTER, US Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE, Clerk of the Court TERRY NAFISI, and others in ht US District Court, Central District of California, alleging public corruption through the conduct of simulated litigation in Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al (2:10-cv-00048).
Dr Zernik has gained substantial experience in analyzing fraud in state and US court records in recent years. His opinions were repeatedly supported by highly reputed experts.
Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al originated in Fine’s complaint pursuant to Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law (42 US §1983), alleging the circumstances, where California Judges illegally conspired against him at the behest of the State Bar officials, Los Angeles County government officials, and lawyers for the developers, who opposed him in the courtroom.
However, the affair as a whole should be deemed part of the intimidation, harassment, and retaliation against the former US prosecutor Richard Fine. Following his protest of the corruption of California judges, he was held in solitary confinement for 18 months, starting March 2009, with no warrant ever issued, and no judgment/conviction or sentencing ever entered in his case.
A pattern of false and deliberately misleading court records is found in the case of Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al (2:10-cv-00048):
· Clerk of the Court TERRY NAFISI refuses to certify any of the PACER dockets of the court;
· No valid summonses are found in the docket, in alleged violation of Duties of the Clerk pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
· No Civil Cover Sheet is found in the docket, which is required for the opening of a civil docket;
· No valid Assignment Order for Judge JOHN WALTER is found in the docket;
· No valid Referral Order for Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE is found in the docket;
· Numerous entries in the docket are by Ms DONNA THOMAS, who upon information and belief is not a Deputy Clerk, and Clerk of the Court TERRY NAFISI has denied numerous requests to confirm or deny DONNA THOMAS’s authority as a Deputy Clerk;
· The Clerk of the Court routinely denies access to the electronic authentication records (NEFs – Notices of Electronic Filing), and in similar cases, where the same persons were accused, all NEFs were eventually discovered to be invalid;
· Attorney KEVIN MCCORMICK, who appears in this case on behalf of the Defendants, falsely appeared on behalf of related defendants in a related case, with no authority at all, and
· No declaration or any other record signed by any of the Defendants is found in the pleading filed on their behalf, consistent with conduct of simulated litigation, and appearance by an unauthorized attorney.
The case should be deemed of the highest public policy significance, since it holds at bay the prospect of any honest court services in Los Angeles County, in particular, and in California, in general. Of note, the 2010 official Staff Report of the Human Rights Council of the United Nations referred to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California".
The case also reflects the fraud inherent in the design and operation of PACER and CM/ECF, the public access and case management systems of the US courts.
The complaint was copied to the US Congress Judiciary Committees and the Human Rights Council of the United Nations.

More info:

Published by: Human Rights Alert, NGO on Jun 20, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/24/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 
Human Rights Alert 
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
 
Blog:
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ 
 Scribd: 
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
 
11-06-20 Request for investigation/impeachment, in re: Conduct of Alleged Simulated Litigationin
Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al 
(2:10-cv-00048), in the US DistrictCourt, Central District of California
 
Executive Summary
Los Angeles, June 20 
– Joseph Zernik, PhD, and Human Rights Alert (NGO) filed complaint with the US Congress and with the USAttorney Office, Los Angeles, against US Judge JOHN WALTER, US Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE, Clerk of the Court TERRYNAFISI, and others in ht US District Court, Central District of California, alleging public corruption through the conduct of simulatedlitigation in
Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al 
(2:10-cv-00048).Dr Zernik has gained substantial experience in analyzing fraud in state and US court records in recent years. His opinions wererepeatedly supported by highly reputed experts.
Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al 
originated in Fine’s complaint pursuant to Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law (42US §1983), alleging the circumstances, where California Judges illegally conspired against him at the behest of the State Bar officials,Los Angeles County government officials, and lawyers for the developers, who opposed him in the courtroom.However, the affair as a whole should be deemed part of the intimidation, harassment, and retaliation against the former US prosecutorRichard Fine. Following his protest of the corruption of California judges, he was held in solitary confinement for 18 months, startingMarch 2009, with no warrant ever issued, and no judgment/conviction or sentencing ever entered in his case.A pattern of false and deliberately misleading court records is found in the case of
Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al 
(2:10-cv-00048):
Clerk of the Court
TERRY NAFISI
refuses to certify any of the PACER dockets of the court;
No valid summonses are found in the docket, in alleged violation of Duties of the Clerk pursuant to the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 
;
No Civil Cover Sheet is found in the docket, which is required for the opening of a civil docket;
No valid Assignment Order for Judge
JOHN WALTER
is found in the docket;
No valid Referral Order for Magistrate
CARLA WOEHRLE
is found in the docket;
Numerous entries in the docket are by Ms
DONNA THOMAS
, who upon information and belief is not a Deputy Clerk, and Clerk ofthe Court
TERRY NAFISI
has denied numerous requests to confirm or deny
DONNA THOMAS
’s authority as a Deputy Clerk;
The Clerk of the Court routinely denies access to the electronic authentication records (NEFs – Notices of Electronic Filing), and insimilar cases, where the same persons were accused, all NEFs were eventually discovered to be invalid;
Attorney
KEVIN MCCORMICK
, who appears in this case on behalf of the Defendants, falsely appeared on behalf of relateddefendants in a related case, with no authority at all, and
No declaration or any other record signed by any of the Defendants is found in the pleading filed on their behalf, consistent withconduct of simulated litigation, and appearance by an unauthorized attorney.The case should be deemed of the highest public policy significance, since it holds at bay the prospect of any honest court services inLos Angeles County, in particular, and in California, in general. Of note, the 2010 official Staff Report of the Human Rights Council ofthe United Nations referred to "
corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement inCalifornia
".The case also reflects the fraud inherent in the design and operation of PACER and CM/ECF, the public access and casemanagement systems of the US courts.The complaint was copied to the US Congress Judiciary Committees and the Human Rights Council of the United Nations.
____June 20, 2011
The Honorable Lamar Smith,
Chair 
US House Committee on the Judiciary2138 Rayburn House Office BuildingWashington, DC 20515Fax: 202-225-8628The Honorable Patrick Leahy,
Chair 
 US Senate Committee on the Judiciary
Digitally signedby Joseph Zernik DN: cn=JosephZernik, o, ou,
 
email=jz12345@earthlink.net,c=USDate: 2011.06.2008:25:49 +03'00'
 
Page 2/2 June 20, 2011
433 Russell Office BuildingWashington DC 20510Fax: 202-224-3479The Honorable Spencer Bachus,
Chair 
US House Committee on Financial Services2129 Rayburn House Office BuildingFax: 202-225-2082The Honorable David Dreier,
Chair 
U.S. House of RepresentativesH-312 The CapitolWashington, D.C. 20515FAX: (202) 225-6763EMAIL: Rules.Rs@mail.house.gov
 By fax and by email
Andre Birotte Jr.,US Attorney, Central District of California.221 N Figueroa St, Los Angeles, CA 90012By fax: 213-894-6269FBILos Angeles and other officesBy email
Dear Congressmen Bachus, Dreier, Leahy, and Smith, and US Attorney Birotte:Please accept instant notice and the records, outlined and linked below, pertaining to the conduct of allegedsimulated litigation [
i
] in
 Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al
(2:10-cv-00048), in the US DistrictCourt, Central District of California. [
ii
] The case pertains to the rights of an individual, but it bears on theHuman, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of all who reside in Los Angeles County, in particular, andCalifornia, in general.Please also notice below the request for Due Process in acknowledgment, review, and notice of outcome of complaints filed with your offices.
 COMPLAINTA. Complainants
Joseph Zernik, PhD, and Human Rights Alert (NGO)Mailing Address: PO Box 526, La Verne, California 91750Tel: 323-515-4583Fax: 323-488-9697Email: (preferred) jz12345@earthlink.net 
1. Dr Zernik gained substantial experience over the past decade in analyzing fraud in largegovernment and corporate case management systems.
Dr Joseph Zernik gained substantial experience in records examination, particularly in examination of computerized court records: [
iii
]
Dr Zernik published a report pertaining to PACER and CM/ECF, which was published in a peer-review computer science journal (see below), and reviewed hundreds of PACER dockets and relatedcourt records from US district courts and US courts of appeals across the United States.
Dr Zernik filed a report on Human Rights in Los Angeles County, California, as part of the first ever2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States. The report wasincorporated into the staff report of the Human rights Council of the United Nations with a reference
 
Page 3/3 June 20, 2011
to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement inCalifornia".
Dr Zernik published a report in a peer-reviewed computer science journal, with editorial boardincluding scholars from six European nations and Canada, opining fraud in the case managementsystems and online public access systems of the Los Angeles County jails (Inmate InformationCenter) - enabling large-scale false imprisonments under the pretense of lawfulness.
April 2009 – Dr Zernik authored reports regarding Sustain, the case management system of theSuperior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. Upon review of the reports, a leadingcomputer science scholar, Prof Eliyahu Shamir, provided a qualified opinion, supporting Dr Zernik’sclaims of fraud in the design and operation of the system, and calling on US computer sciencescholars to examine the integrity of the system.
January 2009 – Dr Zernik’s opinion of fraud in specific litigation records of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, was reaffirmed by the opinion of Fraud Expert James Wedick, anFBI veteran, who had been decorated by the US Congress, US Attorney General, and FBI Directorfor his accomplishments in crime prevention. [v]
Dr Zernik’s opinion of fraud in the underwriting and loan records of Countrywide FinancialCorporation and related persons, was supported by the opinion of Fraud Expert Robert Meister, aFraud Expert, who appears in courts across the United States.
Dr Zernik’s opinion of fraud in the online public access of the California Commission on TeachersCredentialing relative to teachers’ credentials in the Beverly Hills School District was confirmedafter two lengthy investigations by the California Department of Education, which determined “TheSchool District is out of compliance and in violation of the law”.
 2. Complainants are not attorneys, neither are they represented by counsel in matters, whichare subject of instant complaint.
Therefore, in most case, no sections of the code were cited. Instead, the US Congress and US Attorneyare requested to apply the correct sections of the code. In case errors were made, where sections of thecode were cited, it is requested that such errors be ignored, and instead, the facts alone be reviewed, andthe correct sections of the code be applied by your offices.
 B. The Accused
Instant request is for investigation, and impeachment proceedings, pursuant to Section 4 of Article Two of theUnited States Constitution, against:1. US Judge John Walter,2. US Magistrate Carla Woehrle3. Clerk of the Court Terry NafisiWith it, this notice is also a request for US Attorney and FBI investigation and prosecution, of the followingindividuals for conduct amounting to Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law and Racketeering in theCourts:4. Donna Thomas, Courtroom Assistant5. Attorneys Kevin and Tracey McCormick 6. Others, who colluded in the conduct detailed below.
C. Public Policy Significance
1. The ongoing case of former US Attorney Richard Fine holds at bay the prospect of any honest court services in Los Angeles County, in particular, and in the State of California, in general.
The case at hand,
 Richard I Fine v State Bar of California et al
(2:10-cv-00048), originated in Fine’scomplaint pursuant to Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law, 42 US §1983, alleging the

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->