P. 1
Response to DoeResponse to Doe
Ratings: (0)|Views: 678
|Likes: 0
Published by TorrentFreak_
See more
See less
https://www.scribd.com/doc/58415263/Response-to-Doe
06/21/2011
text
original
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANANEW ALBANY DIVISION
Hard Drive Productions Inc.,Plaintiff v.DOES 1
21,DefendantsCASE NO. 4:11-cv-00059-SEB-WGHJudge: Sarah Evans Barker Magistrate Judge: William G. Hussmann
RESPONSE TO THE ANONYMOUS LETTER DATED JUNE 1
,
2011
Comes now the Plaintiff, Hard Drive Inc., and responds to the anonymous letter purportedlywritten by a defendant on June 1, 2011.It is highly unlikely that this letter was written by one of the defendants in this case as the writer proclaims. The complaint was filed on May 20th and the anonymous letter was written less than twoweeks later, before any discovery action was taken by plaintiff. It is difficult to imagine one of thedefendants stumbling across the exhibit attached to the complaint, and identifying their own IP address asone listed, in that timeframe. Counsel for the Plaintiff believes the letter to be submitted by a pro-piracyorganization with an agenda of keeping the internet as a safe-haven for copyright infringement.The Court is fully capabl
and ascertaining thequality of evidence presented in this proceeding. The anonymous letter expresses fears to the contrary, but these fears are not a good justification for curtailing discovery of the identities of those who haveconspired to pirate copyrighted material.
Case 4:11-cv-00059-SEB-WGH Document 13 Filed 06/10/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 62
Download and print this document
- Read and print without ads
- Download to keep your version
- Edit, email or read offline
