Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
The Correct Understanding Regarding Ruling by Other Than Allahs Law, According to the Scholars of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah Past & Present

The Correct Understanding Regarding Ruling by Other Than Allahs Law, According to the Scholars of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah Past & Present

Ratings: (0)|Views: 49|Likes:
statments from Scholars of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah Past & Present on ruling by other than Allahs law and the different situations and rulings this may take
statments from Scholars of Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah Past & Present on ruling by other than Allahs law and the different situations and rulings this may take

More info:

Published by: Abdul Kareem Ibn Ozzie on Jun 27, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/06/2012

pdf

text

original

 
Taken From Ahlu Sunnah WalJamaah.ComThe CorrectUnderstanding RegardingRuling By Other Than Allahs Law, According ToThe Scholars Of AhlusSunnah Wal Jamaah Past& PresentBy Abdul Kareem IbnOzzie
 
In this age the takfires have distorted the understanding of makingtakfir of the Muslim rulers in this time based on the issue of ruling by other than Allahs law or as some say ruling by man made laws.The reason for this is because the takfires have claimed that wheneverthe Muslim ruler does rules by other than Allahs law more than onceor twice and he makes other than Allahs law in a number of issues acode of law to be referred to or he judges by other than Allahs law more than once or twice he automatically becomes a kaafir taghootapostate due to his major kufr.In regards to this issue the takfires have lead astray many with thisdangerous incorrect understanding of takfir based upon ruling by other than Allahs law. Thus it is possible to find a person whodisagrees with the takfires in all the points of their deviated manhaj but he aggress with them in making takfir of the Muslim rulers in thistime based on the issue of ruling by other than Allahs law. So thisindividual thinks he has rejected the takfires and is free from theirmanhaj but he has been in fact infected with the foundation of theirmanhaj.The foundation of their manhaj is the Muslim rulers of today are allkuffaar for a number of reasons but the most important one of themall is because the Muslim rulers of today all rule by other than Allahslaw and Allah said
“And whoever does not judge by what Allahhas revealed – then it is those who are disbelievers.”
{al- Maa’idah (5): 44
}.On the other hand some Muslim think a Muslim can never be madetakfir of after he has testified to the shahhadah (None has the right to be worshiped in truth expect Allah and that prophet Mohammed ishis (Allahs) slave and messenger), unless he denies/rejects with hisheart something true from the religion (like prayer being anobligation) then he is deemed to have major kufr thus he isconsidered a kaafir. This group is similar to the Murjiah (one of the
 
first Islamic groups to deviated from the sunnah today this group nolonger exist but groups and some Muslims hold some or many of their beliefs sometimes without even knowing it), who held a very similar belief. So this group say a Muslim ruler can not become a kaafir dueto ruling by other than Allahs law as he has testified to the shahhadahand plus the tafsir of that verse in which it states it is kufr to rule by other than Allahs law it is referring to major sin and minor kufr whichdoes not expel a person from Islam. These people then quote thefollowing:
 Abu’l-Madhfar as-Sama’aanee
said:
“And whoeverdoes not judge by what Allah has revealed – then it is those who are disbelievers.”
{al-Maa’idah (5): 44}…
Ibn ’Abbaas said:the verse is about the Muslims and the intent is
kufr 
 
less than
kufr (minor kufr)
and I know that the
 Khawaarij 
use this verse as a proof and say whoever does not rule by what Allaah has revealed is adisbeliever. The people of Sunnah (Ahlus Sunnah) say –
he does notdisbelieve
by leaving off ruling (by Allahs law). Tafseer ul-Quraan, vol.2, p.42al-Haakim narrated, from the way of ‘Ali bin Harb, from Sufyaan bin‘Uyaynah from Hishaam bin Hujayr from Tawoos, that Ibn ‘Abbassaid: “
It is not the kufr that you are going towards (in yourminds), it is not the kufr that expels one from the religion,“And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed –then it is those who are disbelievers.”
{al-Maa’idah (5): 44}
...iskufr less than kufr.
[al-Haakim al-Mustadrak, volume 2/313]
 Al-Haakim
said: “This hadeeth has an authentic chain of transmission and Shaykhayn did not transmit it.”
 Adh-Dhahabee
agreed with him (Al-Haakim).
Shaykh Al-Albaanee
stated in as-Saheehah, vol.6, p.113: It would have been more deserving that they (said: “...on the conditions of Shaykhayn (Bukhaaree and Muslim)” asthe isnad is of this type. Then I saw that
al-Haafidh Ibn Katheer
transmitted in his Tafseer, vol.6, p.163 from
al-Haakim
that he said:“the hadeeth is Saheeh on the conditions of Shaykhayn (Bukhari andMuslim).”
 
So it is obvious that this statement is omitted in the printed

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->