Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
USA Brief in Wham-O

USA Brief in Wham-O

Ratings: (0)|Views: 109 |Likes:
Published by lawrencehig

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: lawrencehig on Jun 30, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/30/2011

pdf

text

original

 
 No. 2011-1067
 
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUITFLFMC, LLC,Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WHAM-O, INC.,Defendant-Appellee, v.UNITED STATES,Intervenor. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western Districtof Pennsylvania in case no. 10-CV-0435, Judge Arthur J. SchwabBRIEF FOR THE INTERVENOR UNITED STATESTONY WESTAssistant Attorney GeneralMICHAEL F. HERTZDeputy Assistant Attorney GeneralDOUGLAS N. LETTER (202) 514-3602Appellate Litigation CounselCivil Division, Room 7513Department of Justice950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.Washington, D.C. 20530
 
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage
INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE UNITED STATES.......................1 ARGUMENT................................................................................................................7I.THE PURPOSE AND HISTORY OF THE GOVERNINGSTATUTORY SCHEME IN SECTION 292 STRONGLY SUPPORT ITS CONSTITUTIONALITY.............................................8 A.
Qui Tam
Provisions Like Section 292(b) Have aSterling Pedigree in the Law of the United States.......................9B.The History o
Qui Tam
Statutes in the United StatesConfirms the Constitutionality of Section 292(b).....................16II.THE
QUI TAM
MECHANISM IN SECTION 292 DOESNOT FACIALLY VIOLATE CONSTITUTIONAL SEPARATION OF POWERS PRINCIPLES.......................................23 A.History and Practice Demonstrate that Section 292(b)Does Not Prevent the President from AccomplishingHis Constitutionally Assigned Functions...................................24B.Section 292(b) Does Not Impermissibly Interfere with the President's Duties..........................................................29C.
Morrison
is Readily Distinguishable.............................................45D.The Facial Constitutionality of Section 292(b) isNot Squarely Presented...............................................................48III.THE
QUI TAM
MECHANISM IN SECTION 292(b) DOESNOT VIOLATE THE APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE...........................51CONCLUSION..........................................................................................................56
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICECERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 32(a)OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE
ii

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->