Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
28Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
11-07-01 Apple Motion for PI Against Samsung

11-07-01 Apple Motion for PI Against Samsung

Ratings: (0)|Views: 34,436 |Likes:
Published by Florian Mueller
Apple motion for preliminary injunction against four Samsung products in the U.S. market. For more information visit the FOSS Patents blog at http://fosspatents.blogspot.com
Apple motion for preliminary injunction against four Samsung products in the U.S. market. For more information visit the FOSS Patents blog at http://fosspatents.blogspot.com

More info:

Published by: Florian Mueller on Jul 01, 2011
Copyright:Public Domain

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/24/2013

pdf

 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
A
PPLE
S
M
OTION FOR A
P
RELIMINARY
I
NJUNCTION
C
ASE
N
O
.
 
11-
CV
-01846-LHKsf-3006623
 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)hmcelhinny@mofo.comMICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)mjacobs@mofo.comJENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) jtaylor@mofo.comALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)atucher@mofo.comRICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)rhung@mofo.comJASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530) jasonbartlett@mofo.comMORRISON & FOERSTER
LLP
 425 Market StreetSan Francisco, California 94105-2482Telephone: (415) 268-7000Facsimile: (415) 268-7522Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLE INC.KENNETH H. BRIDGES (CA SBN 243541)kbridges@bridgesmav.comMICHAEL T. PIEJA (CA SBN 250351)mpieja@bridgesmav.comBRIDGES & MAVRAKAKIS LLP3000 El Camino RealOne Palo Alto Square, 2nd FloorPalo Alto, CA 94306Telephone: (650) 804-7800Facsimile: (650) 852-9224UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIASAN JOSE DIVISIONAPPLE INC., a California corporation,Plaintiff,v.SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., aKorean corporation; SAMSUNGELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a NewYork corporation; and SAMSUNGTELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,Defendants.Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
APPLE INC.’S MOTION FOR APRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Date: August 5, 2011Time: 1:30 p.m.Place: Courtroom 4, 5th FloorJudge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document86 Filed07/01/11 Page1 of 37
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
A
PPLE
S
M
OTION FOR A
P
RELIMINARY
I
NJUNCTION
C
ASE
N
O
.
 
11-
CV
-01846-LHKsf- 3006623
i TO DEFENDANTS AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on August 5, 2011 at 1:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as thematter may be heard, in the courtroom of the Honorable Lucy H. Koh at the United States DistrictCourt for the Northern District of California, 280 South 1st Street, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, SanJose, Plaintiff Apple Inc. shall and hereby does move the Court for a preliminary injunctionprohibiting Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., andSamsung Telecommunications America, Inc. (collectively “Samsung” or “Defendants”), frommaking, using, offering to sell, or selling within the United States, or importing into the UnitedStates, the following recently released products: the Galaxy S 4G, Infuse 4G, and Droid Chargesmartphones, and the Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet computer
 .
This motion is based on this notice of motion and supporting memorandum of points and authorities; the supporting declarations andexhibits of Cooper C. Woodring, Ravin Balakrishnan, Patrick J. Zhang, Jason R. Bartlett, RichardJ. Lutton, Jr., and Sissie Twiggs; and such other written or oral argument as may be presented ator before the time this motion is taken under submission by the Court.Dated: July 1, 2011 HAROLD J. MCELHINNYMICHAEL A. JACOBSJENNIFER LEE TAYLORALISON M. TUCHERRICHARD S.J. HUNGJASON R. BARTLETTMORRISON & FOERSTER
LLP
 By: /s/ Michael A. JacobsMICHAEL A. JACOBSAttorneys for Plaintiff APPLE INC.
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document86 Filed07/01/11 Page2 of 37
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
A
PPLE
S
M
OTION FOR A
P
RELIMINARY
I
NJUNCTION
C
ASE
N
O
.
 
11-
CV
-01846-LHKsf- 3006623
ii 
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage
INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1ARGUMENT..................................................................................................................................5I. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION STANDARD..................................................................5II. APPLE IS LIKELY TO SUCCEED ON THE MERITS OF ITS CLAIMFOR DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT......................................................................5A. Apple Is Likely to Prove Design Patent Infringement at Trial...............................61. The Samsung Infuse 4G and Galaxy S 4G Phones Infringethe ’D677 Patent..........................................................................................72. The Samsung Infuse 4G and Galaxy S 4G Phones Infringethe ’D087 Patent........................................................................................113. Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 10.1 Infringes the ’D889 Patent..........................13B. Apple is Likely to Prevail on Design Patent Validity at Trial..............................16III. APPLE IS ENTITLED TO A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BASEDON SAMSUNG’S INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’381 PATENT......................................17A. The ’381 Patent Has Survived Reexamination and Does Not PresentAny Claim Terms Requiring Construction...........................................................17B. Apple Is Likely to Succeed on the Merits.............................................................181. Samsung Infringes the Claims of the ’381 Patent.....................................182. Samsung Is Unlikely to Prevail on Invalidity at Trial...............................23IV. A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IS NECESSARY TO PREVENTIRREPARABLE HARM..................................................................................................24A. Apple Will Be Irreparably Harmed if Samsung Continues to Erodethe Distinctiveness of Apple’s Designs and to Take Market Share......................24B. Because Apple Is Seeking a Preliminary Injunction AgainstSamsung’s Newly Released Products, Its Alleged Delays inEnforcing Its Rights Are Irrelevant.......................................................................27V. THE BALANCE OF EQUITIES WEIGHS DECIDEDLY IN APPLE’SFAVOR.............................................................................................................................29VI. A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SERVES THE PUBLIC INTEREST.......................30VII. CONCLUSION.................................................................................................................30
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document86 Filed07/01/11 Page3 of 37

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->