ESPfinal Report

ESPfinal reportsteve23.
doc
___________________________________________ ESP FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR KUROVDAG FIELD

Prepared by: Max Bough (IPM) Revised by: Luis M. Sandoval N.( IPM )
Max Bough/ Luis M. Sandoval
1 of 2
6/7/2003
ESPfinal reportsteve23.doc
CONTENT
I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI.
HISTORY ESP JUSTIFICATION METHODOLOGY (ESP CANDIDATE SELECTION) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNS RISKS RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DESIGNS COST ESTIMATES INSTALLATION PROGRAM AND GUIDELINES ATACHTMENTS
2 of 2
6/7/2003
I. HISTORY The Kurovdag field had some ESP installations in the past (around 20-30 in the 90s) with about 13-14 wells as recently as 2000. Shirvans approach was to pump high water -cut high volume wells. According to interviewed field personnel, there were several probable causes for cancellation of the ESP program. The ESP program was discontinued as a result of the following probable reasons: poor management decisions (such as imprudent water handling that became expensive), companys financial problems at the time and internal politics (most likely cause). The company providing ESP services at the time for Shirvan was Azneft, which charged around $35 per installation on daily basis. The service covered ESP systems completely: completion design, servicing, troubleshooting were all handled by Azneft at its expense. Virtually all ESP-associated risk was handled by this service company. Recently, Schlumberger held a business meeting with Azneft regarding future possibilities of using their services. Given certain assurances, they are willing to work under similar schemes as before.
II. ESP JUSTIFICATION Having reviewed the producing potential of the active wells in the field, current installations (Rod Pumps) and previous ESP experience, the Schlumberger team concluded that only introduction of an alternative artificial lift technology in the field will drastically improve fields production. The current rod pump systems are not well suited for the application: they have a high failure rate due to emulsion/sand problems and are operated under poor engineering practices. All of these results into intensive maintenance, high operational costs and, obviously, in a limited production on beam pupm. A more flexible reliable artificial lift system is needed to improve efficiency, profitability and production in the field. Such systems could be ESPs, PCPs and potentially jet pumps.
III. METHODOLOGY (ESP CANDIDATE SELECTION) Extensive criteria have been applied to producing wells to come up with the best 10 candidates (See Table 1 for Criteria). First, all active wells were scanned for current production, water cut, and dynamic fluid levels, which resulted into the pool of 59 wells. Second, the wells were broken down into 3 production tiers and IPR curves were constructed for the first 16 wells. The results indicated that wells with lesser production, higher watercut and lower pressures do not appear very attractive economically, so the first 16 were retained for further study. Third, the wells were re-ranked based on their PI and minimum expectation of incremental oil at Pwf of 500 psi (3.4 MPa) (roughly equivalent to 400 m of fluid column above the upper perf). The top 10 candidates were screened with DCS using geological and reservoir criteria. Finally, all 10 were reviewed with the field geologists and engineers for wellbore conditions. Table 2 and Figure 1 through 3 present the results of the study. Note that the geological and reservoir uncertainties were mitigated in all calculations. In cases where PI computations were affected by lack of data or a range of uncertainties, the most conservative guesses were used to eliminate the risk of overestimation. Similarly, reserve estimates are presented rather conservatively. In addition, uphole potential was often minimized, and in reality should be a higher number.
3 of 9
6/5/2003
IV. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS There are several additional considerations that will be addressed during further development of the ESP project. It is suspected that the most wells in the field have a rather significant skin caused by either drilling in the past or current operating practices. While the presented here results reflect the current operating conditions of the wells, much better deliverability could be expected if the skin damage is remove d. Therefore, the IPM team is actively searching for ways to address this issue (i.e. organic solvents or other products which may be provided by local chemical companies). Finding a solution may yield significant economic benefits for the project. Wellbore cleanout is another issue being studied by the IPM team. It has been observed that some of the perforations in the field were sanded off with the consequent re-completion in the upper zones, avoiding attempts to bail the produced sand. A practice of bailing the produced sand and cleaning the perfs properly may prove an economic project of its own and may also improve expected deliverability of the wells. Cement condition (mechanic & hydraulic ) behind the casing is extremely critical to achieve incremental oil production without an iflux of water, which may be caused by improper cement isolation and channelling from adjacent zones. In additon, appropriate cement isolation will minimize problems with the ESP downhole equipment and extend the lifetime of the installation. Precise knowledge of wellbore configuration in terms of real casing ID clearance is a big issue . Casing collapse and non-standard tubular installation (irregular csg design) are quite common problems in the Kurovdag wells . F or that reason dummy runs must be done before any ESP installation. Understanding the flowline configuration along with the appropriate well test data before and after ESP installation are crucial for a good well performance assessment and confirmation of the incremental value incorporated by this type of artificial lift system. Knowing that some formations in Kurovdag Field are susceptible to sand production even with beam pump system, it is recommended to control the speed of the ESP (variable speed drives). This way the inflow of the well could be reduced and the amount of fines controlled to prevent premature problems for ESP subsurface equipment. Utilization of down hole sensors, such as pressure and temperature will be needed to verify data supplied by the Echometer. Such sensors will allow to confirm well P Is. With introduction of ESP lift system, paraffin deposition should slow down along the tubing string due to higher temperatures and flowrates and move to the surface facilities. This issue has to be addressed in more detail with possible chemical treatment and adjustments at the surface.
4 of 9
6/5/2003
V. CONCERNS There was some disagreement with the Shirvan field people. Field geologists insist than none of the studied wells would benefit from ESP lift. According to them, any additional drawdown created by ESPs would change the producing regime of the formation, bringing in a lot of sand into the wellbore and killing the well. In addition, several other reasons were brought up such as imprudent usage of reserves with ESP lift (appare ntly ESP are supposed to decrease the final recovery!!!) and low permeability of the aforementioned wells (those are the highest PIs in the field!!!). Instead, they offered a list of wells they want to put on ESPs, which incidentally have 90% and above watercut (in most cases producing from the same sands as chosen by IPM). When asked whether these high watercut wells would have any of the mentioned sand problems, they simply propose staying a sufficient amount of distance from the perfs to let the sand settle. Incidentally, an ESP specialist who worked in Kurovdag extensively in the past says that only few formations gave his ESPs any sand-associated problems such as Apsherons (PS series was said to be manageable). Ultimately, this sand producing theory has to be studied more carefully to have some kind of technical/empirical answer to those claims. The answer just may be Shirvans old local mentality of delaying production and accelerating production in high water cut wells to keep them active.
VI. RISKS As it was mentioned before, a comprehensive list of criteria was applied to the studied wells trying to filter out any apparent risk associated with ESPs. Nevertheless, there are further studies needed to evaluate potential risks of the following. First is sand production. Sand theories given by Shirvan field geologist are not consistent and are not based on any hard evidence (same as with their GOR estimates). Thus, a more detailed quantitative evaluation of the sand problems involving fluid samples and review of sand production history is require d. In addition, ESP local specialists, preferably with an extensive knowledge of the Kurovdag Field, can be a useful source of experience and will help to formulate the required forward plan and mitigate known risks. Second potential risk may be presented by wellbore conditions. The discussed wells were reviewed with the field geologists and were deemed suitable. Nevertheless, a dummy run, preferably following a wellbore clean up, is recommended before running the equipment. Paraffin is another consideration worth mentioning. With introduction of ESP lift, paraffin deposition should slow down along the tubing string due to higher temperatures and flowrates and move to the surface facilities. This issue will be addressed in more detail with possible chemical treatment and adjustments at the surface. A comprehensive risk-weighted decision tree will eventually be constructed to evaluate effects of the potential risk on the expected cash flow in case of ESP installation.
5 of 9
6/5/2003
VII. RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the reserve estimates, expected flowrates and other aforementioned criteria, the following wells deserve further attention and should be considered for further evaluation: 1030, 1045, 1126, 1263, 1220 and 1355. These wells have significant reserves to back up expected high PIs, which range from 8,500 to 44, 000 recoverable reservoir cubic meters (~59,000 300,000 stb) and significant uphole potential (See Table 2 and Figure 1 through Figure 3 for reference). Their expected incremental oil deliverability ranges from 5 to 26 tonne/d (~ 38-200 stb/d for assumed Pwf of 500 psi). These wells present a low risk investment from the reservoir and deliverability standpoint, and in the case of successful introduction of ESPs or P CPs should yield significant financial returns. The rest of the wells listed in the report (345, 751, 1181, and 1222) appear unsuitable for ESP application due to a series of reasons, such as a risk of depletion, watering out or limited drainage area (See Table 2 for details). These wells are still decent producers and should be considered for low-cost optimisation with the current lift equipment or other low-cost alternatives. Note, that some of them, specifically 751 and 1181, have decent uphole potential and could be considered for ESP lift if recompleted in the above zones.
VIII. DESIGNS Preliminary designs were generated for each of the selected wells to identify the type of downhole and surface equipment required (See attached designs). Note, that at this point there are ranges of uncertainties for such input variables as GOR, gas rates and PI estimates. In addition, well test data have in some case are uncertain.
IX. COST ESTIMATES Table 3 summarises ESP costs for benchmarking purposes (Azerbaijan, Russia n and USA made ESPs are compared). At this point, the most attractive ESP vendor would most probably be Azneft. Because of the low cost (possibly ~$35-40/day/well), knowledge of the field and complete service that mitigates the risk for Schlumberger and the client, this company appears as the most likely choice. In addition, this company has experience putting together and running various equipment of local, Russian and Western manufacturing, that gives them extra flexibility in design of the systems. Some contractual assurances would have to be given to Azneft to solidify Shirvans and Schlumbergers commitment.
6 of 9
6/5/2003
X. INSTALLATION PROGRAM AND GUIDELINES Below is the outline for ESP program w ith description and important guidelines for ESP installation in the Kurovdag Field. Prior to the job: Reconfirm input data for ESP design is accurate Perform a representative well test prior to ESP installation (to confirm Oil, Water, Gas, GOR, BSW, API, Fluid level among other parameters). This will serve as a benchmark for ESP performance. Design the most adequate E SP system according to the well potential deliberability Have a written detailed operational program, including roles and responsibilities for SLB personnel and for the Operator Obtain agreement and signatures from the corresponding parties Confirm that pulling unit or work-over rig to be used has adequate personnel, and tools to execute the job in an efficient and safe way Confirm that both production and operation people in the field are in the loop and receive additional production from the well (satellites-Production Areas-Tank Farm)
During the job: Perfom a coordination meeting with all the personnel involved in the ESP installation Review the progr am and clarify doubts (roles & responsibilities) Confirm that all the required equipment and personnel are available at the well site Ensure the well is controlled and the required flow barriers are in place (keep control fluid in surface as a contingency) POOH existing completion configuration and monitor permanently static fluid level condition ( avoid kick of the well ). Fill out well with control fluid Do service for EPM motor and seal section then RIH ESP equipment (Temperature & Pressure sensors, motor, seal section, pump or gas separator if the last one is required ) RIH ESP equipment slowly, following manufacturers guidelines to protect equipment and cable Verify integrity of the ESP power cable at least every 500 m (avoid turning pipe and cable while RIH ESP). No more than three splices on the cable must be done . Hang tubing string on tubing hanger and install back pressure valve (BPV) Remove BOPs to install X-tree Install Test valve and perform X-tree test for at least 15 minutes Remove test valve Make up flow line and connect it to test separator Perfom hydraulic test on flowline an test separator Check electric conditions on surface (vent box, transformer, VSD or swithboard) Prepare surface equipment to receive fluid production (flow line, test separator, satellite. Hand radios are extremely useful! )
7 of 9
6/5/2003
Set operating parameters on VSD or switchboard Perform quick coordination meeting just before start up ESP Start ESP pump and monitor permanently well p arameters and ESP performance Execute a short test approximately six (6) hours before release work over rig or pulling unit
After the job: Perform a representative well test (approximately 24 hrs) to get the control fluid or dead fluid displaced by the ESP pump. The following parameters must be collected every 30 minutes to quantify the value added ( incremental production by ESP) o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ESP frequency ESP motor voltage ESP amperage ( three phases ) Down hole Pressure Down hole temperature Well head pressure Casing pressure Dynamic fluid level Separator pressure Separator temperature Fluid production Oil production Water production Gas production API gravity Gas specific gravity Water gravity
Note: Charts will be a good indication for well evaluation.
8 of 9
6/5/2003
XI ATTACHMENTS Table 1: ESP Candidate Selection Criteria Table 2: Summary for Top 10 ESP Candidates Table 3: ESP Vendors and Costs Figure 1: Reserves and Expected Incremental Oil Figure 2: Reserves and Total Expected Oil Figure 3: Reserves and Uphole Potential Attached ESP designs for 6 wells
9 of 9
6/5/2003
Table 1: ESP Candidate Selection Criteria

Initial Screening Production History Productivity index ( PI ) or well reservoir fluid deliverability Water cut ( BSW ) and GOR Geology Perforation history, block details, reservoir boundaries Quality of sands, adjacent producers and production performance of sands Water contacts, water injection Reservoir OOIP estimates, Cumulative production history, illegal perfs, remaining reserves Drainage area (boundaries), water injection, w. conning Current and post production decline Uphole Potential Operations Parafin/asphaltenes production, emulsion problems, sand/fine production Verification of casing size, condition of casing, cement behind casing Wellhead and flowline conditions Tubing condition and availability Surface equipment capacity to handle additional volumes Surface facilities to perform well test, additional testing equipment Power supply system availability to be transmited to ESP motor Wellsite conditions (Access road, location) Well deviation
D/Current/ESPESPCandSteveFigures.xls
6/5/2003
Table 2: Summary for Top 10 ESP Candidates

Perfs Well 345 751 1030 1045 1126 1181 1222 1263 1220 1355 Block BL04 BL12 BL01 BL13 BL10 BL01 BL01 BL13 BL01 BL01 PA PA01 S PA03 PA01 N PA03 PA03 PA01 S PA01 N PA03 PA01 N PA01 N Zone
PS02 PS04,05,06-09 PS 01+PS02 PS08+PS09 PS07+PS08 PS03 PS02+PS03 PS09+PS10 PS 04+06 PS03+PS04
P Csg mm
146 152 X 127 146 146 X 178 146 X 168 146 146 140 X 146 X 168 146 146
P Csg Condition good good good good good good good good good good
Parafin Problems severe no info severe moderate no info moderate severe no info severe severe
Pr Estimate Mpa 17 14 23 36 25 22 24 36 23 22
Recent FL
Above MP, m
Mid-Perf (m) 3,119 2,472 2,892 2,951 2,938 2,899 3,058 2,896 3,211 3,148 9.6 8 8.6
Production March'03 oil, t/d W, m3/d 3.2 6.5 13.2 5.4 3.5 18.3 6.9 0.3 0 4.4 WC, % 23 42 62 24 25 64 33 1 0 26
m 3115-3123 2154-2275 2805-2978 2887-2990 2820-3025 2869-2930 3023-3093 2856-2936 3094-3328 3046-3308
1,552 1,350 2,058 flowing 1,890 1,773 1,954 flowing 2,210 1,862
15.1 9.3 9.6 12.4 25 24.3 11.5
*Expected Performance (Pwf ~ 500 psi (3.4 Mpa)) Total Liq Well 345 751 1030 1045 1126 1181 1222 1263 1220 1355 m3/d 25 32 56 60 29 48 40 50 33 29 Total Oil oil, t/d 17.3 16.7 19.3 41.2 19.6 15.6 24.4 44.6 29.3 19.1 Low 7.7 8.7 10.7 26.1 10.3 6.0 12.0 19.6 5.0 7.6 Incr. Oil 3 Est., t/d Med 11.0 11.1 12.0 31.6 22.9 10.1 14.1 23.6 7.9 10.7 High 13.7 13.4 14.1 36.0 32.1 14.1 16.4 27.0 9.6 14.0 Remaining Rec Reserves, Rm3 Low 0 0 24,600 37,000 44,000 0 5,000 32,000 31,000 8,400 Med 0 0 40,400 44,500 55,000 0 7,200 39,500 36,500 10,500 High 7,800 5,800 56,000 52,000 66,000 0 9,400 47,000 42,000 12,600 Uphole P., Rm3 0 May be close to depletion 17,800 May be close to depletion, decent uphole sands (>50m) 4,300 Excelent current reserves, little uphole 32,000 Huge reserve potential (up to 120,000 drained by 1045 and 1263 (360 m away). Uphole P > 100m 18,000 Huge reserve potential (up to 100,000 in the block drained only by 1126) 12,500 PS 03 - bad quality, offset producers show water coming in 1181 6,800 Thin sand, limited drainage (wtr), small uphole potential 38,000 Huge reserve potential (up to 120,000 drained by 1045 and 1263 (360 m away). Uphole P > 200m 3,500 Good reserves, low decline 3,400 Ok reserves, little uphole potential Comments
D/Current/ESP/ESPCandSteveFigures.xls
6/5/2003
Table 3: ESP Cost Estimates and Benchmarking
VENDOR
COST
(Complete System), K$
VSD
Variable Speed Drive
SERVICE
(supervision, repairs, troubleshooting)
REPRESENTATIVE
MANUFACTURING
NOTES
Alnas (Russia) Borets (Russia) Reda (US) ESP Woodgroup (US) Weatherford (US) CentrLift (US) Azneft ESP (Azerbaijan)
40 K(VSD not available) 28-30 K (35-40 w VSD) 100-150K (200K w VSD) $130-160K (w VSD) 150-200 K (w VSD) 150-200 K (w VSD) $35/well/day*
N/A available 2003 YES YES YES YES N/A
extra extra extra $500/hr extra extra extra included
RU (Moscow, Tatarstan) Moscow Moscow Moscow Austria Baku Baku
Russia Russia Oklahoma/Dubai Dubai Dubai Dubai Baku
cost includes delivery cost includes delivery delivery will cost more delivery will cost 20-30% more delivery will cost more delivery will cost more local cost, also can equipment others
Reserves and Initial Increments (ESP Candidates)

60,000 50
50,000 40 Initial Incremental Oil Rates, tonne/d

6/5/2003
40,000 Reserves, Rm3 30 30,000 20 20,000
10 10,000
345 751 1030 1045 1126 Wells Reserves, Rm3 Initial Incremental Oil Rates, tonne/d 1181 1222 1263 1220 1355
Figure 1: Reserves and Expected Minimum Incremental Oil Rates
Reserves and Total Oil Rates Expected (ESP Candidates)

60,000 50
50,000 40 Initial Total Oil Rates, tonne/d

6/5/2003
40,000 Reserves, Rm3 30 30,000 20 20,000
10 10,000
345 751 1030 1045 1126 Wells Reserves, Rm3 Initial Total Oil Rates, tonne/d 1181 1222 1263 1220 1355
Figure 2: Reserves and Total Minimum Expected Oil Rates
Reserves and Uphole Potential (ESP Candidates)

90,000
80,000
70,000
60,000 Reserves, Rm3
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
345 751 1030 1045 1126 Wells Reserves, Rm3 Uphole Potential, Rm3 1181 1222 1263 1220 1355
Figure 3: Reserves and Uphole Potential Combined
6/5/2003
ESP DESIGNS FOR THE BEST SIX CANDIDATES (Curves Attached) WELL 1355
GENERAL DESCRIPTION Company Name: Schlumberger Well Name: 1355 Field Name: Kurovdag Reservoir Name: PS Analyst: Eduardo Escobar D. Calculation Type: Rigorous Design Location: Comments: Date: 06/03/2003 WELLBORE DATA OD Bottom MD No. in ft ft 2.875 Wt Top MD lb/ft ID in HTM HL Tubing 1 0.0006500 9600.00 6.50 2.441 Bearing Cap., lb: 3144.5 Operating Thrust Load, lb: 791.1 Maximum Thrust Load, lb: 1190.2 Power Consumption, HP: 0.4 SEAL DATA Manufacturer: Series: 325-375 Bearing Type: Chamber Selection: Reda 325 HL PF SB
Rough. in
Casing 1 5.500 15.50 0.0006500 10800.00 0.00 Pump Depth, ft: 9600.00 Top of Perfs. or Datum Pt. (MD), ft: 10051.00 Reservoir Temperature, F: 150.0 Wellhead Temperature, F: 70.0 MOTOR DATA
4.950
PUMP DATA 1 Manufacturer: Series: 338 Model: A400 Reda
CABLE DATA Manufacturer: Reda Type: Redalead Size: 4 Cu Shape: Round Conductor Type: Solid Max. Cond. Temp., F: 400.0 Cable Length, ft: 9700.00 Solve for: Surface Voltage Electric Cost, $/kWH: 0.00
Manufacturer: Reda Series: 375 Type: 87 - Double Name Plate Power, HP: Plate Frequency, Hz: 60 Name Plate Voltage, Volts: Plate Current, Amps: 37.0 Adjust for Motor Slip:Yes 29.3 Design Frequency, Hz: Operating Voltage, Volts: Operating Motor Load, HP: Operating Power Factor, frac: (@ Design Frequency) Operating Motor Load, : Operating Efficiency, %: Operating Speed, RPM: Velocity, ft/sec: 0.342 Amps: 76.5 1500.00 Name Name
Minimum Recommended Rate, Bbl/D: 158.84** Maximum Recommended Rate, Bbl/D: 397.11** Rate at Peak Efficiency, Bbl/D: 208.00** Power at Peak Efficiency, HP: 23.5** Frequency, Hz: 52.0 ** = Corrected for Frequency & Viscosity Number of Stages, : 624 Stages with Free Gas: 624 Additional Stages due to Gas: Viscosity Correction Factors User Entered Rate: 1.000 No Head: 1.000 No Power: 1.000 No Efficiency: 1.000 Design 624 Stages Total Dynamic Head (TDH), ft: 6384.71 6427.15 Surface Rate (O+W), Bbl/D: 300.00 301.04 Avg. Pump Rate (O+G+W), Bbl/D: N/A 345.35 Pump Intake Pressure, psig: 1171.0 1163.1 Operating Power, HP: N/A 40.9 Min. Efficiency, %: N/A 33.6 Pump Derating Derating Factor for Rate, %: 92.0 Derating Factor for Head, %: 92.0 Derating Factor for Power, %: 115.0 Housing Data Hsg. # Hsg. Type Length, ft # of Stages 100 FL 14.80 208 100 FL 14.80 208 100 FL 14.80 208 Total 300 44.40 624 Blank Stages Input: 0 Net Stages in Pump: 62
Operating Current, 52.0 1300.00 43.5 0.611 65.65 74.82 3021
Design Freq. Frequency, Hz 52 Conductor Temp., F 156.3 Max. Allowable Amps, Amps 147.9 Amperage, Amps 29.3 Kilovolt Amper, KVA 73.6 Kilowatts, KW 45.0 Kilowatts, $/mo 0 Surface Voltage, Volts 1452.3 Voltage Drop @ 68.0 F, Volts 129.5 Voltage Drop @ 150.0 F BHT, 152.3 Kilowatt Loss, KW 4.7 Cost of Voltage Loss, $/mo 0 Required Motor Voltage, Volts 1300.0 Downhole Voltage at Motor, 1300.0 In-rush Motor Voltage Drop, 609.0 Motor Startup Voltage, Volts 843.2 Startup/Operating Ratio, ratio 0.6
Fluid
Well Fluid Temperature, F: 146.4 Speed Increase Heating, F: 0.0 Skin Temperature Rise, F: 42.0 Harmonic Heating due to VSD, F: 4.3 Avg. Winding Temp. Rise over Skin, F: 25.0 Total Winding Temp., F: 213.4 If Sine Wave Filter is used in VSD operation, Harmonic Heating is zero. Catalog Actual Volts
Total Stages 624 624 Slip Stages 0 0 Total Dynamic Head (TDH), ft 6427.15 6381.87 Surface Rate (O+W), Bbl/D 301.04 Avg. Pump Rate (O+G+W), Bbl/D 343.95 Pump Intake Pressure, psig 1163.1 Operating Power, HP 40.9 40.9 Min. Efficiency, % 33.6 33.8 Operating Speed, RPM 3033
299.82 345.35 1172.3
Volts Volts
3021
WELL 1220
GENERAL DESCRIPTION Company Name: Schlumberger Well Name: 1220 Field Name: Kurovdag Reservoir Name: PS 04/05 Analyst: Eduardo Escobar D. Calculation Type: Rigorous Design Location: Comments: Date: 06/03/2003 WELLBORE DATA OD Wt Top MD in ID No. ft Rough. in ft 2.875 Bottom MD lb/ft in SEAL DATA Manufacturer: Reda Series: 325-375 Bearing Type: Chamber Selection: HTM HL
325 HL PF SB
Tubing 1 0.0006500 9700.00
6.50
2.441 Bearing Cap., lb: 3285.9 Operating Thrust Load, lb: 876.1 Maximum Thrust Load, lb: 1301.6 Power Consumption, HP: 0.4
Casing 1 5.500 0.0006500 11000.00 0.00
15.50
4.950
Pump Depth, ft: 9700.00 Top of Perfs. or Datum Pt. (MD), ft: 10210.00 Reservoir Temperature, F: 150.0 Wellhead Temperature, F: 70.0 PUMP DATA 1 Manufacturer: Series: Model: Reda 338 A400 MOTOR DATA Manufacturer: Series: Type: Reda 375 87 - Double 67.5 990.00 Name Name
Minimum Recommended Rate, Bbl/D: 167.21** Maximum Recommended Rate, Bbl/D: 418.02** Rate at Peak Efficiency, Bbl/D: 363.00** Power at Peak Efficiency, HP: 49.1** Frequency, Hz: 55.0 Number of Stages, : 624 Stages with Free Gas: 624 Additional Stages due to Gas: Viscosity Correction Factors User Entered Rate: 1.000 Head: 1.000 Power: 1.000 Efficiency: 1.000 624 Stages No No No
Name Plate Power, HP: Plate Frequency, Hz: 60 Name Plate Voltage, Volts: Plate Current, Amps: 51.5 Adjust for Motor Slip:Yes 45.2 Design Frequency, Hz: Operating Voltage, Volts: Operating Motor Load, HP: Operating Power Factor, frac: (@ Design Frequency) Operating Motor Load, : Operating Efficiency, %: Operating Speed, RPM: Velocity, ft/sec: 0.340 Amps:
Fluid
Design
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), ft: 7469.33 7489.49 Surface Rate (O+W), Bbl/D: 300.00 300.52 Avg. Pump Rate (O+G+W), Bbl/D: N/A 351.35 Pump Intake Pressure, psig: 966.3 963.2 Operating Power, HP: N/A 46.5 Min. Efficiency, %: N/A 33.4 Pump Derating Derating Factor for Rate, %: Derating Factor for Head, %: Derating Factor for Power, %: Housing Data Hsg. # Hsg. Type 100 FL 100 FL 100 FL Total 300 Blank Stages Input: Net Stages in Pump: Length, ft 14.80 14.80 14.80 44.40 0 624 92.0 92.0 115.0
Well Fluid Temperature, F: 146.0 Speed Increase Heating, F: 0.0 Skin Temperature Rise, F: 51.8 Harmonic Heating due to VSD, F: 4.3 Avg. Winding Temp. Rise over Skin, F: 25.0 Total Winding Temp., F: 222.8 If Sine Wave Filter is used in VSD operation, Harmonic Heating is zero. Catalog Total Stages Slip Stages Actual 624 0 624 0 Volts
Volts Volts
# of 208 208 208 624
WELL 1126
GENERAL DESCRIPTION Company Name: Schlumberger Well Name: 1126 Field Name: Kurovdag Reservoir Name: PS 07/08 Analyst: Eduardo Escobar D. Calculation Type: Rigorous Design Location: Comments: AN550 Date: 06/03/2003 WELLBORE DATA OD Wt Top MD in ID No. ft Rough. in ft 2.875 Bottom MD lb/ft in SEAL DATA Manufacturer: Reda Series: 325-375 Bearing Type: Chamber Selection: HTM HL
325 HL PF SB
Tubing 1 0.0006500 8800.00
6.50
2.441 Bearing Cap., lb: 3285.9 Maximum Thrust Load, lb: 3001.0 Power Consumption, HP: 0.6
Casing 1 5.500 0.0006500 10000.00 0.00
15.50
4.950
Pump Depth, ft: 8800.00 Top of Perfs. or Datum Pt. (MD), ft: 9282.00 Reservoir Temperature, F: 150.0 Wellhead Temperature, F: 70.0 Tubing Outflow Correlation: Brown (1963) PUMP DATA 1 Manufacturer: Series: Model: Reda 338 AN550 MOTOR DATA Manufacturer: Series: Type: Reda 375 87 - Double 102.0 1480.00 Name Name Hagedorn &
Minimum Recommended Rate, Bbl/D: 301.50** Maximum Recommended Rate, Bbl/D: 527.62** Rate at Peak Efficiency, Bbl/D: 532.95** Power at Peak Efficiency, HP: 72.1** Frequency, Hz: 57.0 Number of Stages, : 652 Stages with Free Gas: 652 Additional Stages due to Gas: 0 Viscosity Correction Factors User Entered Rate: 1.000 No Head: 1.000 No Power: 1.000 No Efficiency: 1.000 Design 652 Stages Total Dynamic Head (TDH), ft: 7439.40 7515.67 Surface Rate (O+W), Bbl/D: 350.00 352.21 Avg. Pump Rate (O+G+W), Bbl/D: N/A 389.16 Pump Intake Pressure, psig: 780.6 768.1 Operating Power, HP: N/A 75.3 Min. Efficiency, %: N/A 22.4 Pump Derating Derating Factor for Rate, %: 80.0 Derating Factor for Head, %: 80.0 Derating Factor for Power, %: 120.0 Housing Data Hsg. # Hsg. Type Length, ft ** = Abrasion Resistant 100 CR** 14.80 100 CR** 14.80 100 CR** 14.80 100 CR** 14.80 Total 400 59.20 Net Stages in Pump: 652 # of 163 163 163 163 652
Fluid
Stages
348.75 389.16 787.7
Volts Volts
3297
WELL 1045
GENERAL DESCRIPTION Company Name: Schlumberger Well Name: 1045 Field Name: Kurovdag Reservoir Name: PS 08 Analyst: Eduardo Escobar D. Calculation Type: Rigorous Design Location: Comments: AN550 Date: 06/03/2003 WELLBORE DATA OD Wt Top MD in ID No. ft Rough. in ft 2.875 Bottom MD lb/ft in SEAL DATA Manufacturer: Reda Series: 325-375 Bearing Type: Chamber Selection: HTM
325 STD PF SB
Tubing 1 0.0006500 8217.00
6.50
2.441 Bearing Cap., lb: 963.1 Maximum Thrust Load, lb: 513.5 Power Consumption, HP: 0.3
Casing 1 5.500 15.50 0.0006500 9650.00 0.00 Pump Depth, ft: 8217.00 Top of Perfs. or Datum Pt. (MD), ft: 9527.00 Reservoir Temperature, F: 150.0 Wellhead Temperature, F: 70.0 MOTOR DATA
4.950
PUMP DATA 1 Manufacturer: Series: Model: Reda 338 AN550
CABLE DATA Reda 375 87 - Single 25.5 760.00 Name Name Manufacturer: Reda Type: Redalead Size: 4 Cu Shape: Round Conductor Type: Solid Max. Cond. Temp., F: 400.0 Cable Length, ft: 8317.00 Solve for: Surface Voltage Electric Cost, $/kWH: 0.00
Manufacturer: Series: Type:
Minimum Recommended Rate, Bbl/D: 306.89** Maximum Recommended Rate, Bbl/D: 537.06** Rate at Peak Efficiency, Bbl/D: 467.50** Power at Peak Efficiency, HP: 10.8** Frequency, Hz: 50.0 ** = Corrected for Frequency & Viscosity Number of Stages, : 145 Stages with Free Gas: 145 Additional Stages due to Gas: Viscosity Correction Factors User Entered Rate: 1.000 No Head: 1.000 No Power: 1.000 No Efficiency: 1.000 Design 145 Stages Total Dynamic Head (TDH), ft: 667.40 573.35 Surface Rate (O+W), Bbl/D: 490.00 485.55 Avg. Pump Rate (O+G+W), Bbl/D: N/A 606.93 Pump Intake Pressure, psig: 2064.3 2088.2 Operating Power, HP: N/A 8.9 Min. Efficiency, %: N/A 29.8 Pump Derating Derating Factor for Rate, %: Derating Factor for Head, %: Derating Factor for Power, %: Housing Data ** = Abrasion Resistant 90 CR** Total 90 Blank Stages Input: Net Stages in Pump: 13.30 13.30 0 145 145 145 92.0 92.0 110.0
Fluid
Total Stages 145 145 Slip Stages 0 0 Total Dynamic Head (TDH), ft 573.35 Surface Rate (O+W), Bbl/D 485.55 Avg. Pump Rate (O+G+W), Bbl/D 607.05 Pump Intake Pressure, psig 2088.2 Operating Power, HP 8.9 9.0 Min. Efficiency, % 29.8 23.2 Operating Speed, RPM 2916
577.50 485.64 606.93 Volts 2087.7 Volts 2918
WELL 1030
GENERAL DESCRIPTION Company Name: Schlumberger Well Name: 1030 Field Name: Kurovdag Reservoir Name: PS 01/02 Analyst: Eduardo Escobar Calculation Type: Rigorous Design Location: Comments: Date: 06/03/2003 WELLBORE DATA OD Wt Top MD in ID No. ft Rough. in ft 2.875 Bottom MD lb/ft in SEAL DATA Manufacturer: Reda Series: 325-375 Bearing Type: Chamber Selection: HTM HL
325 HL PF SB
Tubing 1 0.0006500 8700.00 Casing 1 0.0006500 9850.00
6.50
2.441 Bearing Cap., lb: 3285.9 Power Consumption, HP: 0.1
5.500 0.00
15.50
4.950
Pump Depth, ft: 8700.00 Top of Perfs. or Datum Pt. (MD), ft: 9257.00 Reservoir Temperature, F: 150.0 Wellhead Temperature, F: 70.0 PUMP DATA 1 Manufacturer: Series: Model: Reda 338 A400 MOTOR DATA Manufacturer: Series: Type: Reda 375 87 - Double 51.0 1260.00 Name Name CABLE DATA Manufacturer: Type: Size: Shape: Round Conductor Type: Solid Max. Cond. Temp., F: 0.0 Cable Length, ft: 8800.00 Solve for: Surface Voltage Electric Cost, $/kWH: 0.00
Minimum Recommended Rate, Bbl/D: 182.59** Maximum Recommended Rate, Bbl/D: 456.48** Rate at Peak Efficiency, Bbl/D: 396.00** Power at Peak Efficiency, HP: 37.1** Frequency, Hz: 60.0 ** = Corrected for Frequency & Viscosity Number of Stages, : 363 Stages with Free Gas: 363 Additional Stages due to Gas: Viscosity Correction Factors User Entered Rate: 1.000 Head: 1.000 Power: 1.000 Efficiency: 1.000 Design No No No
Fluid
363 Stages
Well Fluid Temperature, F: 145.2 Increase Heating, F: 0.0 Skin Temperature Rise, F: 25.4 Harmonic Heating due to VSD, F: Avg. Winding Temp. Rise over Skin, F: Total Winding Temp., F: 196.3 Catalog Actual
Speed
0.0 25.7
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), ft: 5239.77 5235.88 Surface Rate (O+W), Bbl/D: 360.00 359.67 Avg. Pump Rate (O+G+W), Bbl/D: N/A 379.38 Pump Intake Pressure, psig: 1135.9 1137.6 Operating Power, HP: N/A 39.1 Min. Efficiency, %: N/A 35.6 Pump Derating Derating Factor for Rate, %: Derating Factor for Head, %: Derating Factor for Power, %: Housing Data NO HOUSINGS SELECTED 92.0 92.0 110.0
Volts
359.56 379.38 1138.2 Volts Volts 3473
WELL 751
GENERAL DESCRIPTION Company Name: Schlumberger Well Name: 751 Field Name: Kurovdag Reservoir Name: PS 05 Analyst: Eduardo Escobar D. Calculation Type: Rigorous Design Location: Comments: Date: 06/03/2003 WELLBORE DATA OD Wt Top MD in ID No. ft Rough. in ft 2.875 Bottom MD lb/ft in SEAL DATA Manufacturer: Reda Series: 325-375 Bearing Type: Chamber Selection: HTM
325 STD PF SB
Tubing 1 0.0006500 6100.00 Casing 1 0.0006500 9250.00
6.50
2.441 Bearing Cap., lb: 963.1 Operating Thrust Load, lb: 669.3 Maximum Thrust Load, lb: 1038.6 Power Consumption, HP: 0.3
5.500 0.00
15.50
4.950
Pump Depth, ft: 6100.00 Top of Perfs. or Datum Pt. (MD), ft: 6583.00 Reservoir Temperature, F: 150.0 Wellhead Temperature, F: 70.0 PUMP DATA 1 Manufacturer: Series: Model: Reda 400 DN440 MOTOR DATA Manufacturer: Series: Type:
CABLE DATA Reda 375 87 - Double 51.0 1260.00 Name Name Manufacturer: Reda Type: Redalead Size: 4 Cu Shape: Round Conductor Type: Solid Max. Cond. Temp., F: 400.0 Cable Length, ft: 6200.00 Solve for: Surface Voltage Electric Cost, $/kWH: 0.00
Minimum Recommended Rate, Bbl/D: 75.93** Maximum Recommended Rate, Bbl/D: 417.63** Rate at Peak Efficiency, Bbl/D: 366.67** Power at Peak Efficiency, HP: 30.8** Frequency, Hz: 50.0 Number of Stages, : 429 Stages with Free Gas: 429 Additional Stages due to Gas: Viscosity Correction Factors User Entered Rate: 1.000 Head: 1.000 Power: 1.000 Efficiency: 1.000 Design No No No
Fluid
429 Stages
Total Dynamic Head (TDH), ft: 5655.92 5606.11 Surface Rate (O+W), Bbl/D: 260.00 258.22 Avg. Pump Rate (O+G+W), Bbl/D: N/A 310.59 Pump Intake Pressure, psig: 557.9 566.0 Operating Power, HP: N/A 30.2 Min. Efficiency, %: N/A 33.1 Pump Derating Derating Factor for Rate, %: Derating Factor for Head, %: Derating Factor for Power, %: Housing Data 13.40 161 90 FL 13.40 60 FL 9.20 Total 240 36.00 Blank Stages Input: 0 Net Stages in Pump: 429 92.0 92.0 115.0
Well Fluid Temperature, F: 144.1 Speed Increase Heating, F: 0.0 Skin Temperature Rise, F: 37.4 Harmonic Heating due to VSD, F: 4.3 Avg. Winding Temp. Rise over Skin, F: 25.0 Total Winding Temp., F: 206.5 If Sine Wave Filter is used in VSD operation, Harmonic Heating is zero. Catalog Actual Volts Total Stages 429 429 Slip Stages 0 0 Total Dynamic Head (TDH), ft 5606.11 5517.14 Surface Rate (O+W), Bbl/D 258.22 Avg. Pump Rate (O+G+W), Bbl/D 306.76 Pump Intake Pressure, psig 566.0 Operating Power, HP 30.2 29.1 Min. Efficiency, % 33.1 35.8 Operating Speed, RPM 2916
255.04 310.59 Volts 580.5 Volts 2888
161 107 429
WELL 1355
Pump Performance (TDH) Reda 338 A400 / 624 Stgs / 52.0 Hz

20000
1355.sp6
15000
TDH, ft
10000
5000
0 0 100 200 300 Rate, Bbl/D Pump Curve at 52.0 Hz Pump Curve at 57.0 Hz Well System Curve Pump Curve at 42.0 Hz Pump Curve at 62.0 Hz Design Point Pump Curve at 47.0 Hz Min-Max Optimum Rate Reg: Authorized User - Schlumberger 400 500 600 700
Inflow Performance 1355

4000
1355.sp6
3000
Pressure, psig
2000
1000
0 0 100 200 Rate, Bbl/D Inflow @ Perfs Inflow @ Pump Design Point Reg: Authorized User - Schlumberger 300 400 500
WELL 1220

20000
1220.sp6
15000
TDH, ft
10000
5000

4000
1220.sp6
3000
Pressure, psig
2000
1000
WELL 1126
Pump Performance (TDH) Reda 338 AN550 / 652 Stgs / 57.0 Hz

16000 14000 12000 10000 TDH, ft 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 0 100 200 300 400 Rate, Bbl/D Pump Curve at 57.0 Hz Pump Curve at 62.0 Hz Well System Curve Pump Curve at 47.0 Hz Pump Curve at 67.0 Hz Design Point Pump Curve at 52.0 Hz Min-Max Optimum Rate 500 600 700
1126.sp6
800
Reg: Authorized User - Schlumberger

4000
1126.sp6
3000
Pressure, psig
2000
1000
0 0 100 200 300 Rate, Bbl/D Inflow @ Perfs Inflow @ Pump Design Point Reg: Authorized User - Schlumberger 400 500 600
WELL 1045

6000
1045.sp6
5000
4000 Pressure, psig
3000
2000
1000
0 0 100 200 300 400 500 Rate, Bbl/D Inflow @ Perfs , Case 2 Inflow @ Pump , Case 3 Inflow @ Perfs , Case 3 Design Point Inflow @ Pump , Case 2 Reg: Authorized User - Schlumberger 600 700 800 900 1000
Pump Performance (TDH) Reda 338 AN550 / 145 Stgs / 50.0 Hz

6000
1045.sp6
4000
2000
TDH, ft
-2000
-4000
-6000
-8000 0 100 200 300 400 Rate, Bbl/D Pump Curve at 50.0 Hz Pump Curve at 45.0 Hz Pump Curve at 60.0 Hz Well System Curve(Truncated) Pump Curve at 40.0 Hz Pump Curve at 55.0 Hz Min-Max Optimum Rate Design Point 500 600 700 800 900
WELL 1030

10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 TDH, ft 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 100 200 300 400 Rate, Bbl/D Pump Curve at 60.0 Hz Pump Curve at 65.0 Hz Well System Curve Pump Curve at 50.0 Hz Pump Curve at 70.0 Hz Design Point Pump Curve at 55.0 Hz Min-Max Optimum Rate 500 600 700
1030.sp6
800

4000
1030.sp6
3000
Pressure, psig
2000
1000
0 0 100 200 300 Rate, Bbl/D Inflow @ Perfs Inflow @ Pump Design Point Reg: Authorized User - Schlumberger 400 500 600 700
WELL 751

2500
751.sp6
2000
Pressure, psig
1500
1000
500
Pump Performance (TDH) Reda 400 DN440 / 429 Stgs / 50.0 Hz

12000
751.sp6
10000
8000 TDH, ft
6000
4000
2000

ESPfinal Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

ESPfinal Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ESPfinal reportsteve23.

___________________________________________ ESP FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR KUROVDAG FIELD

Max Bough/ Luis M. Sandoval

I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI.

Max Bough/ Luis M. Sandoval

Max Bough/ Luis M. Sandoval

Max Bough/ Luis M. Sandoval

Max Bough/ Luis M. Sandoval

Max Bough/ Luis M. Sandoval

Max Bough/ Luis M. Sandoval

Note: Charts will be a good indication for well evaluation.

Max Bough/ Luis M. Sandoval

Max Bough/ Luis M. Sandoval

Table 1: ESP Candidate Selection Criteria

Table 2: Summary for Top 10 ESP Candidates

15.1 9.3 9.6 12.4 25 24.3 11.5

Table 3: ESP Cost Estimates and Benchmarking

N/A available 2003 YES YES YES YES N/A

extra extra extra $500/hr extra extra extra included

RU (Moscow, Tatarstan) Moscow Moscow Moscow Austria Baku Baku

Russia Russia Oklahoma/Dubai Dubai Dubai Dubai Baku

Reserves and Initial Increments (ESP Candidates)

50,000 40 Initial Incremental Oil Rates, tonne/d

40,000 Reserves, Rm3 30 30,000 20 20,000

Figure 1: Reserves and Expected Minimum Incremental Oil Rates

Reserves and Total Oil Rates Expected (ESP Candidates)

50,000 40 Initial Total Oil Rates, tonne/d

40,000 Reserves, Rm3 30 30,000 20 20,000

Figure 2: Reserves and Total Minimum Expected Oil Rates

Reserves and Uphole Potential (ESP Candidates)

60,000 Reserves, Rm3

Figure 3: Reserves and Uphole Potential Combined

PUMP DATA 1 Manufacturer: Series: 338 Model: A400 Reda

Operating Current, 52.0 1300.00 43.5 0.611 65.65 74.82 3021

299.82 345.35 1172.3

Tubing 1 0.0006500 9700.00

Casing 1 5.500 0.0006500 11000.00 0.00

Operating Current, 55.0 907.50 49.1 0.664 79.36 77.29 3181

# of 208 208 208 624

Tubing 1 0.0006500 8800.00

Casing 1 5.500 0.0006500 10000.00 0.00

Operating Current, 57.0 1406.00 78.6 0.670 81.13 77.58 3298

348.75 389.16 787.7

Tubing 1 0.0006500 8217.00

PUMP DATA 1 Manufacturer: Series: Model: Reda 338 AN550

Manufacturer: Series: Type:

Operating Current, 50.0 633.33 11.3 0.548 53.01 71.44 2919

577.50 485.64 606.93 Volts 2087.7 Volts 2918

Tubing 1 0.0006500 8700.00 Casing 1 0.0006500 9850.00

2.441 Bearing Cap., lb: 3285.9 Power Consumption, HP: 0.1

Operating Current, 60.0 1260.00 42.7 0.678 83.72 77.99 3473

359.56 379.38 1138.2 Volts Volts 3473

Tubing 1 0.0006500 6100.00 Casing 1 0.0006500 9250.00

Operating Current, 50.0 1050.00 31.5 0.646 74.09 76.41 2889

255.04 310.59 Volts 580.5 Volts 2888

161 107 429

Pump Performance (TDH) Reda 338 A400 / 624 Stgs / 52.0 Hz

Inflow Performance 1355

Pump Performance (TDH) Reda 338 A400 / 624 Stgs / 55.0 Hz

Inflow Performance 1220

Pump Performance (TDH) Reda 338 AN550 / 652 Stgs / 57.0 Hz

Reg: Authorized User - Schlumberger