Human
RightsAlert
2231
SouthCourt,PaloAlto,CA94301Fax;213.261.9881;Email:jz12345@earthhnk.net
Blog:
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
Scnbd:
http://v..v...w.scribd.com/Human
RightsAlert
2 0 1 1 ~ 7
-08
Request
for
review
of
integrity
of
theelectronicpublicaccessandcasemanagementsystems
of
theUScourts
by
the
US
AttorneyGeneralTImelyresponserequestedwithin
30
days!
Eric
Holder,
US
Attorney
General
By
email
and
by
fax
USDOJ<12023073569@myfax.com>
Civil
Rights
Devision<12025140293@myfax.com>
CivilRightsDevision<12025140212@myfax.com>USDOJ-IG<12026169898@myfax.com>USDOJ<AskDOJ@usdoj.gov>USDOJ<Barbara.B,Salazar@usdoj.gov>
US
DOJ
<Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov>
USDOJ<Roger.M.Williams@usdoj.gov>USDOJdojfitzgerald<ck,j.fitzgerald@doj.goY>USDOJEmilyLanglie<emily,langlie@usdoj.goY>USOOJ-IG<inspector.general@usdoj.goY>USOOJ·IG<oig,hotllne@usdoj.goY>USHolderEric<eric.holder@usdoj.goY><H,Jarrelt@usdoj.goY>
DearAttorney
General
Holder:
I
write
to
requestthat
you
perfonnyourdutiesandreviewtheintegrity
of
theelectronicpublic
access,case
management
and
electronicfilingsystems
of
the
US
courts.Asdetailedbelow,numerousdeficiencieswereidentified
in
theelectronic
record
systemsofthe
US
courts,
to
the
degreethat
such
systemsseriouslyundenninetheHuman,Constitutional,andCivilRights
of
the
people,Banking
Regulation,andtheRule
of
Law.
As
detailed
in
the
pressreleases,linkedbelow,conditionsthat
now
prevail
in
the
US
courtsareparticularlyhannful
to
pro
se
filers,who
seekremedy
for
allegedabuseoftheirrights
in
the
US
courts.[']
Attemptsto
seekcorrectiveactionsthroughthe
US
courtsthemselveswereunsuccessful.
[lJ
,lIl,I\']
Conditions,
whichnow
prevail
in
the
US
courts,
stand
in
starkcontrastwiththelawsenacted
by
the
US
Congress,presidentialdirectives,andregulationspertaining
to
thevalidationandauthentication
of
recordssystems
in
theExecutiveBranch.
It
is
apparentthatthoroughreview
of
therecordssystemswould
be
alengthyprocess,
and
implementation
of
the
necessarycorrectivemeasures
even
longer.However,Irequestthatyourofficerespond
within
30
days
on
thisimportant
matter,atleastregardingyourintent,ifany,
to
addressthematter.
A.Thewriters,William
Windsor
andJosephZernik,
PhD
•
William
Windsor
is
founder
of
LawlessAmerica.
com.
Hehas
so
far
recruitedover4,000people
to
the
cause
of
supportingtheprotection
of
the
US
Constitution,
and
aims
to
recruit1,000,000.
n
Digitally signedby Joseph Zernik DN: cn=JosephZernik, o, ou,email=jz12345@earthlink.net, c=USDate: 2011.07.0822:15:27 +03'00'
•
Page216
July
8,
2011
•
Joseph
Zemik
has
gainedsubstantialexperience
in
analysis
of
large
record
keepingsystems:["]-
His
opinions
in
suchmatters
were
reviewedandadopted
by
theUnitedNationsofficialStaff
Report,
as
partof2010
UPR
(UniversalPeriodic
Review)
ofI-Iuman
Rights
in
the
UnitedStates.
-
His
opinions
in
suchmattersweresupported
by
lawenforcement
and
computerscienceexperts.-Papers
he
authored
on
thesubject
were
peer-reviewedandpublished
in
an
internationalcomputersciencejournalwithanEditorialBoardlistingscholars
from
sixEuropeannations
and
Canada.
His
opinions
in
suchmatterswereselected
for
presentation
in
internationalcomputerscience
and
criminologyconferences.
B.
The
AdministrativeOffice
of
theUS
Courts
hasimplementedinvalidpublicaccess(PACER)andcasemanagement(CMlECF)systemsintheUScourts,whichundermine
the
integrity
of
UScourtrecords.
I.
Implementation
of
theelectronicrecordssystemsamounted
to
aseachange
in
courtprocedures.
The
US
courtsfailed
to
publish
valid
Rules
of
Courts,
to
establish
the
newcourtprocedures,deemedeffective
by
theUS
Courtsfollowingtheimplementation
of
PACERandCM/ECF.
2.
Thesystems
enablethepublication
of
simulatedPACERdockets,
and
simulatedcourtorders
and
judgments,
whichthe
clerks
of
the
US
courtsrefuse
to
certify.
ell]
3.
In
implementingthesystems,the
US
courts
failed
to
establishalegally
valid
andpubliclyrecognizedfonusofdigitalsignatures
of
judges
and
clerks.
4.
In
implementingthesystems,the
US
courtsestablished
invalid,
simulatedauthenticationrecords
(NEFs
NoticesofElectronicFiling
in
theDistrictCourts,
and
NDAs-Notices
of
DocketActivity
in
the
US
Courts
of
Appeals),whichreplacedthe
valid
Certificates
of
Service,whichwere
used
prior
to
establishment
of
PACERand
CMlECF.
[VlII]
5.
Elimination
of
the
authenticationrecords(NEFsandNDAs)
from
publicaccess
in
the
PACER
dockets
makes
it
impossible
for
thepublic
to
distinguishbetween
valid
andvoidcourtrecords.
6.
Routine
failure
of
the
US
Courts
to
docketthesummonses
in
the
PACERdocket,apparentlyviolates
the
Duties
of
the
Clerkspursuant
to
the
FederalRules
of
CivilProcedure,
andenables
the
initiation
and
conduct
of
entirecases
as
simulatedlitigation
with
no
valid
summonsesever
issued
orexecuted.
['x]
7.
Routine
failure
of
theClerks
to
file
validAssignmentOrders
for
judgesandReferralsOrders
for
Magistratesapparentlyviolates
Due
Processrights.
8.
Routinepublication
in
PACERdockets
of
simulatedminutes,orders,
and
judgments,which
areunsigned
and/orunauthenticated,orwithoutdocketnumberand
linkto
anyrecordat
all
undennines
Equal
Protectionand
Due
Processrights.
9.
Failure
to
establish
valid
accessauthorities
for
courtpersonnel
in
CMIECF
enablesthepublicationof
minutes,
orders,
and
judgments
in
thePACERdockets
by
unauthorizedcourtpersonnel,
whoare
not
DeputyClerks.
10.
Proceduresthatwereeffectivelyestablished
by
the
US
courts
in
CMlECFenabletheappearance
of
attorneys,
who
are
not
Attorneys
of
Record,with
"no
communicationwithclients"clause.
The
practice
is
common
in
casesinvolvingfinancialinstitutionsandgovernmentofficials
and
undenuines
the
integrity
of
the
courts.
[X,
Xl]
II.Proceduresthatwereeffectivelyestablished
by
the
US
courts
in
CMIECFenablethepublication
of
papers
in
the
PACERdockets
by
attorneyswith
no
priorreview
by
authorizedDeputyClerks,
in
apparent
violation
of
theletter
and
thespirit
of
the
Judiciary
Act
(1789).
12.
PACER
wasimplementedwithvariousmodifications
in
thevarious
US
courtsandcourts
of
appeals,
and
enablesthedenial
of
publicaccess
to
criticalcourtrecords(Summonses,papers
filedby
parties,Judgment
Index,
Calendars
of
theCourts,DocketActivityReport,CorporateParentReports,etc)
in
an
arbitrary
and
•
Page3/6
July
8,
2011
capriciousfashion
in
thevariouscourts,
in
apparentviolation
of
FirstAmendmentandDue
PrOcess
rights.
ell]
13.
The
US
courtsfailedtopublishtheprocedurespertainingtoencoding
of
actionsin
eM/ECF.
However,review
of
thesystemdocumentsthatfalseencoding
is
conunonplace,e.g.:
a)
"Motion"encodedas"Mise"-sothatnoaction
is
openedandnoactionneedstobeterminated.
b)
Entirecasesareconductedassimulatedlitigation,where
' ~ o
statuspending
is
open,nostatuspendingwasterminated
in
thiscase".
C.Implementation
ofPACERand
CMlECFeffectivelyestablishedtwoseparateandunequalclasses
in
access
to
thecourtsandtocourtrecords,therebyallegedlydiscriminatingagainst
pro
se
filersandthepublic
at
large.
I.
Pro
se
filersareroutinelydeniedaccess
to
CM/EeF,
andthereforedeniedaccess
to
electronicfiling.andalsoaccesstoinspectand
to
copycriticalcourtrecords.
[XIII]
2.
Thecostandtimerequiredtofileonpaperbyfarexceedthecostandtimerequiredforelectronicfiling.
3.
Thedenial
of
accesstoCM/ECFby
pro
se
filersenablescourtpersonneltoarbitrarilyeliminatefromthePACERdocketspapers,whichweredulyfiledbyprosefilers.
C:
h]
4.
Thedenial
of
publicaccesstocourtrecordsthatareexcludedfromthe
PACER
dockets,andareaccessibleonlythroughCM/ECF(e.g.NEFs,NDAs),effectivelydeniespublicaccesstocriticalcourtrecords
in
apparentviolation
of
FirstAmendmentandDueProcessrights.
5.
Throughallthefeatureslistedabove,theUScourtselectronicsystems(PACERand
CM/EeF)
enabletheconduct
of
casesassimulatedlitigation,particularly
in
civilrightsmatters,wherethecomplainantsare
pro
se
filers.
[XV]
D.
Theelectronicpublicaccess
and
casemanagementsystems(nameunknown)
ofthe
US
SupremeCourtunderminethefoundation
of
theRule
of
Law
[XV)]
I.
Thesystemsenablethepublication
of
dockets,journals,decisions,andjudgmentsby
US
SupremeCourtpersonnel
of
unknownauthority,whicharevagueandambiguous-publicaccess
is
deniedtovalid,signedandauthenticatedcourtrecords.
2.
Thesystemsenabletheissuance
of
USSupremeCourtnotices,decisionsandjudgmentsbyunauthorizedpersonnel.3.Thesystemsenablethedenialtherighttofilepapers
in
theUSSupremeCourtbyunauthorizedpersonnel
E.Conditions,whichwereestablishedthroughimplementation
oftbe
electronicrecordssystem,underminedtheintegrity
of
the
US
courtsinbothHuman,ConstitutionalandCivilRightsandBankingRegnlationmatters.
Ifnot
for
theprotection
of
rights
of
thePeople,addressingtheissuesoutlinedabove
is
requiredforrestoringthelawfulrights
of
thepeopleandtheintegrity
of
USBankingRegulation.
[XV",
XVIII]
It
is
claimedthatconduct
of
thecourts
is
akeyfactor
in
thecurrentfinancialcrisis,which
is
oftenoverlooked.Unlesstheissuesareaddressed,it
is
unlikelythat
US
BankingRegulationwillberestored.Therefore,
it
is
claimedthataddressingtheseissues
is
essentialforrestoringbothcivilsocietyandsocioeconomicdevelopment
in
theUnitedStatesunderthecurrentfinancialcrisis.
F.Proposedcorrectivemeasures
I.
Restoringtheintegrity
of
theoffices
of
theclerks
of
the
US
courts:
It
is
claimedthatconditionsthattodayprevail
in
theUScourtsaresimilartothosethatprevailed
in
theearly20
th
century,andthatboththenandnow,suchconditionsarecentralcause
of
thesocia-economiccrises.The
Salary
Act
(1919),whichplacedtheclerks
of
theUScourtsundertheauthority
of
the
US
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
11-07-08 Request filed with US Attorney General Eric Holder for Review of Integrity of Public Access and Case Management Systems of the US Courts
Dear Attorney General Holder:
I write to request that you perform your duties and review the integrity of the electronic public access, case management and electronic filing systems of the US courts.
As detailed below, numerous… (More)
I write to request that you perform your duties and review the integrity of the electronic public access, case management and electronic filing systems of the US courts.
As detailed below, numerous… (More)
1.2K
Reads
19
Readcasts
5
Embed Views
Get Scribd Mobile
To get Scribd mobile enter your number and we'll send you a link to the Scribd app for iPhone & Android.We've sent a link to the Scribd app. If you didn't receive it, try again.
We'll never share your phone number.
Recommended
More From This User
Notes
Load more
