Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
GONZALEZ v STATE OF AZ (NINTH CIRCUIT) - Pamela Barnett - Motion for Clarification Transport Room

GONZALEZ v STATE OF AZ (NINTH CIRCUIT) - Pamela Barnett - Motion for Clarification Transport Room

Ratings: (0)|Views: 491|Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
07/07/2011 206 Filed (ECF) Amicus Curiae - Pending Pamela Barnett in 08-17094 response to Court order dated 06/17/2011. Date of service: 07/07/2011. [7812226] [08-17094, 08-17115] (PB)
07/07/2011 206 Filed (ECF) Amicus Curiae - Pending Pamela Barnett in 08-17094 response to Court order dated 06/17/2011. Date of service: 07/07/2011. [7812226] [08-17094, 08-17115] (PB)

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Jul 08, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/09/2011

pdf

text

original

 
 
BARNETT REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF ORDER
1
Nos. 08-17094, 08-17115
2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
3
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
4
5
-----------------------------------------------------------
6
PamelaBarnett)e.
7
Contestant,)
8
v.)COMPLAINTCOMPLAINTCOMPLAINTCOMPLAINT
9
MARIAM.GONZALEZ,etal.,)
10
LosAngelesCountyRegistrarDeanLogan,)ELECTIONCONTEST
11
OrangeCountyRegistrarNealKelley,)
12
JohnDoe(s)andJaneDoe(s))
13
Defendants)
14
-----------------------------------------------------------x
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF ORDER
2324
Because it is now a couple of weeks since the Honorable court has had oral
25
hearings on this action and there has not been a clear order on Movant Barnett’s
26
motion to become amicus curiae, Movant Barnett requests clarification of whether
27
Order issued by Chief Judge Kozinski June 17, 2011 (Docket #203, second
28
sentence - “The brief submitted with the motion shall be filed.”) pertained to her
29
Motion to become amicus curiae and her brief. Movant had phone
30
communications with Mr. Beasely (not sure spelling) and in a voicemail message
31
stated that order did not pertain to her (but to Arizona only) but was not provided
32
 
On appeal from the UnitedStates District Court for theDistrict of ArizonaNo.CV06-01268-PHX-ROSCV06-01362-PHX-ROS
 
MARIA M. GONZALEZ, et al.,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.STATE OF ARIZONA, et al.,Defendants-Appellees.THE INTER TRIBAL COUNCILOF ARIZONA, INC., et al.,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.KEN BENNETT, in his official capacityas SECRETARY OF STATEOF ARIZONA.Defendant-Appellee.
Case: 08-17094 07/07/2011 Page: 1 of 3 ID: 7812226 DktEntry: 206
 
 
BARNETT REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF ORDER
with a name of a clerk directly working with the case and wanted to ensure this
1
information was correct. Movant asks court if her motion is approved to become
2
amicus curiae and whether she should forward 25 copies of her brief to the court
3
for their consideration in this case that affects the rights of all U.S. citizens.
4
Movant’s brief contains vital information that needs to be considered by the court
5
in making their decision.
67
s/Pamela Barnett______
8
PAMELA BARNETT
9
Pro Se Amicus Movant
10
1215 22
nd
St., Apt. B
11
Sacramento, CA, 95816
12
Pb_realestate@yahoo.com
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Case: 08-17094 07/07/2011 Page: 2 of 3 ID: 7812226 DktEntry: 206

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->