Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Maariv July12-11 [Ben Caspit -- Where is the Boundary]

Maariv July12-11 [Ben Caspit -- Where is the Boundary]

Ratings: (0)|Views: 583 |Likes:
Published by Didi Remez
----
----

More info:

Published by: Didi Remez on Jul 12, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/04/2012

pdf

text

original

 
Where
 
is
 
the
 
boundary?
 
Ben
 
Caspit,
 
Maariv
 
[front
page],
 
July
 
12
 
2011
 
The
 
boycott
 
law
 
that
 
was
 
passed
 
yesterday
 
by
 
the
 
Knesset
 
is
 
an
 
unnecessary
 
law.
 
But
 
that’s
 
not
 
the
 
point,
 
after
 
all,
 
our
 
lives
 
are
 
filled
 
with
 
unnecessary
 
details.
 
This
 
law
 
is
 
also
 
dangerous.
 
I
 
hope
 
that
 
the
 
day
 
does
 
not
 
come
 
when
 
the
 
guys
 
on
 
the
 
Right
 
realize
 
that
 
their
 
attempts
 
to
 
get
 
the
 
attention
 
of 
 
Likud
 
voters
 
have
 
cost
 
Israeli
 
democracy
 
a
 
high
 
price.
 
I
 
write
 
this
 
not
 
because
 
I
 
support
 
a
 
boycott
 
of 
 
the
 
settlers.
 
Just
 
the
 
opposite.
 
I
 
find
 
the
 
various
 
boycotters
 
repellant.
 
From
 
the
 
theater
 
actors
 
who
 
decide
 
not
 
appear
 
before
 
the
 
residents
 
of 
 
Ariel,
 
to
 
the
 
Israeli
 
lecturers
 
who
 
teach
 
at
 
Israeli
 
universities
 
and
 
receive
 
their
 
salaries
 
from
 
the
 
Israeli
 
taxpayer
 
and
 
call
 
on
 
their
 
fellow
 
academics
 
in
 
the
 
world
 
to
 
boycott
 
Israel.
 
They,
 
in
 
particular,
 
are
 
loathsome,
 
lacking
 
any
 
inhibitions
 
or
 
shame.
 
On
 
the
 
other
 
hand,
 
and
 
there
 
is
 
another
 
hand,
 
we
 
(still)
 
live
 
in
 
a
 
democracy.
 
The
 
view
 
that
 
the
 
settlements
 
are
 
bad
 
and
 
endanger
 
the
 
State
 
of 
 
Israel
 
is
 
a
 
legitimate
 
point
 
of 
 
view.
 
It
 
is
 
permissible
 
to
 
think
 
this.
 
Still.
 
And
 
because
 
it
 
is
 
permissible,
 
it
 
is
 
also
 
permissible
 
to
 
think
 
that
 
anything
 
that
 
is
 
not
 
a
 
crime
 
may
 
be
 
done
 
in
 
order
 
to
 
dismantle
 
the
 
settlements.
 
One
 
can
 
decide
 
not
 
to
 
visit
 
them,
 
one
 
can
 
decide
 
not
 
to
 
buy
 
goods
 
produced
 
there.
 
There
 
is
 
no
 
reason
 
that
 
Haredim
 
should
 
be
 
able
 
to
 
boycott
 
stores
 
that
 
sell
 
pork
 
(or
 
that
 
are
 
open
 
on
 
the
 
Sabbath),
 
that
 
masses
 
of 
 
Israelis
 
can
 
boycott
 
cheese
 
producers
 
and
 
marketers,
 
but
 
left
 
wingers
 
cannot
 
boycott
 
the
 
produce
 
of 
 
the
 
settlements,
 
which
 
they
 
view
 
as
 
a
 
cancerous
 
growth
 
in
 
the
 
state’s
 
meager
 
body.
 
The
 
idea
 
of 
 
a
 
boycott
 
law
 
was
 
not
 
born
 
in
 
sin,
 
but
 
the
 
baby
 
itself 
 
yesterday
 
emerged
 
into
 
the
 
world
 
as
 
a
 
bad
 
thing.
 
Yes,
 
I
 
too
 
think
 
that
 
Israeli
 
companies
 
that
 
won
 
tenders
 
to
 
build
 
in
 
the
 
Palestinian
 
city
 
of 
 
Rawabi
 
on
 
condition
 
that
 
they
 
boycott
 
the
 
settlements
 
should
 
suffer
 
from
 
government
 
sanctions.
 
The
 
government
 
has
 
the
 
tools
 
to
 
do
 
this.
 
And
 
I
 
also
 
think
 
that
 
theaters
 
that
 
receive
 
government
 
funding
 
cannot
 
boycott
 
Ariel.
 
In
 
this
 
matter
 
too,
 
there
 
are
 
tools
 
to
 
handle
 
this.
 
But
 
when
 
this
 
law
 
is
 
also
 
applied
 
to
 
private
 
people,
 
and
 
when
 
the
 
determination
 
as
 
to
 
“what
 
is
 
a
 
boycott”
 
is
 
taken
 
away
 
from
 
the
 
court
 
and
 
given
 
to
 
bureaucrats,
 
and
 
when
 
private
 
citizens
 
can
 
be
 
convicted
 
for
 
voicing
 
their
 
opinion,
 
based
 
on
 
the
 
determination
 
of 
 
those
 
bureaucrats
 
and
 
also
 
to
 
sentence
 
them
 
to
 
pay
 
compensation
 
even
 
without
 
proving
 
damage,
 
this
 
is
 
fascism.
 
This
 
is
 
a
 
blatant
 
and
 
a
 
resounding
 
shutting
 
of 
 
people’s
 
mouths.
 
This
 
is
 
a
 
thought
 
police.
 
There
 
is
 
no
 
choice
 
but
 
to
 
use
 
this
 
word.
 
Fascism
 
at
 
its
 
worst
 
is
 
raging.
 
The
 
Knesset’s
 
legal
 
adviser
 
issued
 
a
 
severe
 
and
 
extraordinary
 
opinion
 
describing
 
this
 
law
 
as
 
being
 
damaging
 
to
 
constitutionality.
 
And
 
even
 
so,
 
the
 
prime
 
minister
 
was
 
not
 
deterred.
 
The
 
pressure
 
of 
 
the
 
Elkins
 
defeated
 
him
 
(after,
 
of 
 
course,
 
zigzagging
 
two
 
nights
 
ago)
 
and
 
the
 
bill
 
passed.
 
Even
 
though
 
we
 
don’t
 
need
 
this
 
law.
 
The
 
produce
 
of 
 
the
 
settlements
 
will
 
not
 
be
 
hurt
 
by
 
a
 
boycott
 
of 
 
a
 
few
 
thousand
 
leftists.
 
They
 
have
 
been
 
doing
 
this
 
for
 
a
 
while
 
now
 
and
 
everything
 
is
 
fine.
 
This
 
has
 
no
 
effect.
 
What
 
can
 
hurt
 
us,
 
is
 
a
 
world
 
boycott
 
of 
 
Israeli
 
products.
 
The
 
news
 
of 
 
this
 
law
 
passing
 
will
 
spread
 
throughout
 
the
 
world
 
like
 
a
 
fire
 
in
 
a
 
field
 
of 
 
thorns,
 
and
 
with
 
no
 
supertanker.
 
Our
 
image,
 
already
 
at
 
a
 
low,
 
will
 
continue
 
to
 
scrape
 
the
 
bottom
 
of 
 
the
 
barrel.
 
The
 
delegitimization
 
will
 
increase.
 
The
 
damage
 
will
 
be
 
great.
 
Because
 
out
 
there,
 
outside
 
of 
 
Israel,
 
they
 
won’t
 
see
 
the
 
difference.
 
Out
 
there
 
they
 
are
 
liable
 
to
 
go
 
with
 
a
 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->