2
2.
Since learning of 34 Degrees infringement, Flatout has repeatedly attempted toresolve this matter without involving the Court. Flatout has repeatedly asked 34 Degrees tocease use of the designation FLAT OUT GOOD. 34 Degrees, however, has refused to stop, has persisted in its intentional infringement, and has left Flatout no choice but to bring this lawsuit to prevent 34 Degrees from further deceiving and confusing the public and harming Flatout’sgoodwill.3.
Accordingly, Flatout brings this action for (i) federal trademark infringement inviolation of Section 32 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114, (ii) federal unfair competition,false designation of origin, and false representations in violation of Section 43 of the LanhamAct, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), (iii) false and deceptive trade practices under the laws of the State of Michigan, MICH COMP. LAWS § 4415.901
et seq.
, and of all the states in which 34 Degreeshas sold its products, and (iv) for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and unjustenrichment under state common law.
THE PARTIES
4.
Plaintiff Flatout, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of theState of Delaware with its principal place of business in this judicial district, in Saline, Michigan.5.
Defendant 34 Degrees LLC is a limited liability company organized and existingunder the laws of the State of Colorado with its principal place of business in Denver, Colorado.34 Degrees may be served at 668 Clarkson Street in Denver, Colorado 80218.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
6.
This Court has federal question jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1121, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338, and 1367(a).
2:11-cv-12977-DML-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 07/11/11 Pg 2 of 15 Pg ID 2
Add a Comment