Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pedestrianization and
Traffic Segregation Projects
06 September 2005
Roles
• MACEA – association of lot owners
in the MCBD; main financier and
implementing body
• ALI – planning and design lead; part
financier of projects
• Makati City LGU – political support
and promotion of projects to attract
investors to Makati City
1
Issues at Outset
• Competition from other emerging
business districts
• Public perception of poor urban
environment
• No alternative to increasing traffic
congestion
• Need for projects to complement
redevelopment efforts in the MCBD
Planning Process
2
Overall Goals
• Improve traffic conditions
• Provide an alternative to driving
• Create a distinct image for MCBD
Pedestrianization Components
1. Pedestrian Underpasses
2. Elevated Walkways
3. Covered Walks
3
Walkway Network
Pedestrian
Underpass
Elevated
Walkway
Covered
Walk
Ayala-Legazpi
Underpass
4
Legazpi
Pedestrian
Mall
Elevated
Walkway
5
Ayala-Paseo
Underpass
Ayala-Rufino
Underpass
6
Paseo-Sedeño
Underpass
Ayala-Salcedo
Underpass
7
Legazpi Village
Covered Walk
8
Ayala Av Covered Walk
9
Traffic Segregation Components
1. Mid-Block Transit Stops and
Pedestrian Crossings
2. Sidewalk Fencing and Landscaping
3. Public Utility Vehicle Loading and
Unloading Zones
Traffic
Segregation
Projects
10
12-Hour Traffic Variation Total (1997-2005)
35,000
30,000
25,000
12-hour vehicles count
20,000
15,000
Off-Peak Period
10,000
17% and 5% lower than AM and PM Peak traffic,
1997 respectively
5,000
2005
0
7-8am 8-9 9-10 10-11 11-12 12-1pm 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7
Ongoing
2006
11
Success Indicators
Public Perception
12
Lessons Learned
• Pedestrians will walk more and
longer with a better environment
• A good pedestrian environment
offsets dense urban conditions
• A good pedestrian environment is
good for business
• Improve and expand the pedestrian
network continually
13