Log In | Sign Up | Help
Upload_transparent

Your document has been indexed by the following search engines:

Google Bot has been here 14 times.

  • First crawled about 1 month ago.
  • Last crawled 1 day ago.

Yahoo! Bot has been here 85 times.

  • First crawled 2 months ago.
  • Last crawled 2 days ago.

MSN Bot has been here 7 times.

  • First crawled about 1 month ago.
  • Last crawled 8 days ago.

Baidu Bot has been here 1 time.

  • First crawled 26 days ago.
Latest Searches Leading to this Doc
silvia montiglio hopkins
naturales quaestiones
de brevitate vitae otium negotium
seneca letters 7.2-5 gladiators
ebook result from exorbitance frankfurt
de polymathia tractatio
does the travel broaden or narrow the mind
+homer +odyssey +"dic mihi musa"
conflict arise from ludus love style
steps of philosophical inquiry
cautiores quam fortiores sunt
seneca labyrinth italian poesia
"seneca voice"
seneca nile expedition
These queries are updated daily.

SHOULD THE ASPIRING WISE MAN TRAVEL? A CONFLICT IN SENECA’S THOUGHT - Silvia Montiglio


Abstract. This article examines the connection between traveling and wisdom in Seneca’s writings. It argues that Seneca is ambivalent vis-à-vis traveling: on the one hand, he deems the activity unnecessary or even dangerous, insofar as it is at odds with mental focus and challenges the ideal of happiness as “home” (domestica felicitas); on the other, he admires those who travel for the sake of knowledge and connects the mobility of the body with the “cosmic fight” of the mind. In line with a long-established tradition, Seneca views travel as the frst step towards philosophical inquiry. The ambivalence extends to the assessment of imperialistic use of travel. Though Seneca loudly condemns it as a manifestation of greed, he also shows admiration for several Roman conquerors.

  • Send This
  • Add_to_favs_transparent
  • Embed
  • Download
  • Flag
  • Add to Favorites

Scribd requires Javascript. Please enable Javascript in your browser.

Document Information

171 Views | 0 Likes | 0 Comments | 3 Favorites

Added By
Description


Abstract. This article examines the connection between traveling and wisdom in Seneca’s writings. It argues that Seneca is ambivalent vis-à-vis traveling: on the one hand, he deems the activity unnecessary or even dangerous, insofar as it is at odds with mental focus and challenges the ideal of happiness as “home” (domestica felicitas); on the other, he admires those who travel for the sake of knowledge and connects the mobility of the body with the “cosmic fight” of the mind. In line with a long-established tradition, Seneca views travel as the frst step towards philosophical inquiry. The ambivalence extends to the assessment of imperialistic use of travel. Though Seneca loudly condemns it as a manifestation of greed, he also shows admiration for several Roman conquerors.

Pdf_16x16 35 Pages


Date Added

2 months ago

Category
Tags
Groups
Type

Academic Paper

Copyright

Attribution Non-commercial

More info »