man's spiritual existence, the moral Law of God. II. And is that Law abrogatedOW, OK SHOR OF ITS SIGIFICACE ? aj, it remains for the Gentile noless thanfor the Jew — for the nineteenth century after Christ no less than for the fifteenthbefore Him — the immutable expression of God's will. God, as the Italian proverbsays, does not pay on Saturdays. He is very patient, and men may long denyHis existence or blaspheme His name, but more than in the mighty strong windwhich rent the mountains, and more than in fire, and more than in earthquake, isGod in that still small voice which is sounding yet. Oh, it is not in Exodus alone,or in Deuteronomy alone, but in all nature that we hear His voice. In scene afterscene of history, in discovery after discovery of science, in experience after expe-rience of life, have we heard these words rolling in thunder across the centuries theeternal distinction of right and wrong. Confidently I appeal to you, and ask, Haveyou not, at some time in your lives, heard the voice of God utter to you distinctlythese Commandments of the moral Law ? Is there one here who has ever dis-obeyed that voice and prospered ? If there be one here who feels, at this moment,in the depths of his soul, a peace which the world can neither give nor take away,is it not solely because by the aid of God's Holy Spirit he has striven to obey it ?Yes, its infinite importance is that it is as old not as Sinai, but as humanity, andrepresents the will of God to all His children in the great family of man ; so thatif in this life we be passing from mystery to mystery, it is our surest proof that weare passing also from God to God. What matters it that we know not eitherwhence we came or what we are, if " He hath shown thee, oh, man ! what is good,and what doth the Lord require of thee but to do justly, and to love mercy, and towalk humbly with thy God ? " HI. And thus it is, lastly, that if we be faithfulTHE Law may lead us to the Gospel. For his must indeed be a shallow soulwho thinks it an easy thing to keep the Commandments. When we observe thatthe summary of the first Table' is that life is worship, and of the second that lite isservice ; wben we notice that the first Table forbids sin against God, first inthought, then in word, then in deed ; while the second, proceeding in a reverseorder, forbids gins against our neighbour first in deed, then in word, and then inthought ; so that, unlike every other code that the world has ever known, theCommandments begin and end with the utter prohibition of evil thoughts, whichof us is not conscious that we have utterly broken God's Law in this, that out of the heart proceed evil thoughts ? And when we go from Moses to Jesus, from Sinaito Galilee, will Christ abolish the Law ? will He teach us that we may keep bothour sin and our Saviour, and that there is no distinction between a state of sin anda state of grace? There are no dim presences, no thundering clouds, no scorchingwilderness, no rolling darkness around the trembling hill, but the sweet humanvoice of one seated in the dawn on the lilied grass that slopes down to the silverlake — but does that voice abrogate the Law ? ay, more stringently than to themof old time come the ten commandments now. JIurder is extended to a furious