IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Susan Herbert, Susan Clemons, Ray M., Richard Pait, Pryce P., Al Franken, Kurt Kallenbach, Tim Thomas, Linda Thomas, Charles Rangel, Rick Webbe , Henry Adams, Tommy Pritchard, A. Snitker, Ron and Cameron Gardiner, Hugh Everett, Ethan and Christopher Quinones, Wen Ho Lee, The Iroquois, Sioux, Hopi, Thomas Jefferson & the other American Founders etc. etc. et al AKA The Proof Of Life Cases

Counsel for the class: Susan Clemons..Susan Herbert..Ray M. 3540 E. Drexel Rd1100 Seagate Avenue 1011100 Seagate Avenue 101 Tucson, AZ 85706Neptune Beach, FL 32266Neptune Beach, FL 32266 520-306-2685904.705.6171 904.705.6171

Versus

Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, William Suter, Danny Bickle, Timothy Gaithner, Donald B Verrilli, Jr., Eric Holder, Bill Ayers and the US, Canada, China, North Korea, Mexico, Norway, France, Great Britain and the rest of Earth etc. etc. et al As individuals and in their legal capacity

DEFENDANTS 2. a. Barack Obama

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, D.C. 20500

b.

Joe Biden

Washington D.C. Office 201 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510

c.

Nancy Pelosi

235 Cannon HOB Washington, DC 20515

d.

William Suter

Supreme Court of the United States One First Street N.E. Washington, DC 20543

e.

Danny Bickle

Supreme Court of the United States One First Street N.E. Washington, DC 20543

f.

Donald B Verrilli, Jr.

Office of the Solicitor General 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20530-0001

g.

Eric Holder

U.S.D.O.J / Attorney General 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001

h.

Timothy Gaithner

Secretary of the Treasury 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, DC 20220

i.

William Bill Ayers N/A

Last Known Address University of Illinois Chicago, IL

j. k. l. m. n.

Canada China North Korea Japan Mexico

o. p. q.

Switzerland Norway France

r. Great Britain etc., or, the rest of Earth who is not the United States for America. The United Nations Headquarters Turtle Bay, Manhattan NY, NY 10017 Frances address is France like Chinas address is China; in this case you would not use the nations capital city but instead use the UN address because of the IMF.

JURISDICTION

3. Basis of jurisdiction:

FEDERAL QUESTION

4. Federal Constitutional, statutory or treaty right at issue?

The original governing documents as they are exactly worded, The Declaration, The Constitution and The Federalist Papers namely safety, EP&DP, Art. 1 Sec.8, Art. 4 Sec.4 and the natural birth clauses as these are the only documents SCOTUS accepts upon matters of law.

5. Diversity of Citizenship N/A

6. Basis for venue in the District of MN:

Facts alleged occurred in MN & Other:

Vikings, a verb form describing people who actively flee political and religious upheaval and persecution, landed in Duluth, MN making a good or valid legal claim dated 1362 and it is the oldest European claim we have that is a deed, a map and is marked physically upon the land, MN has or possesses original jurisdiction as the part of the state east of the Mississippi River was formed by our Revolutionary victory and so the Treaty of Paris while the land west of the Mississippi was acquired with the Louisiana Purchase and that contract contains another within it and both then overlap 1362 claim, Treaty of 1818 was between US and Britain and it establishes the Canadian-US border, the Dakota War resulted in the largest mass execution in the US as 38 Sioux were hanged in Mankato, MN, various facts of Susan H.s life transpired in MN including a violation her enumerated, protected rights, there is long history of non-Christian faiths as the first synagogue established in 1856 thus we have fairness and this DNA is important as both patrilineal and matriarchal markers are different than the European markers and about 11% share R1a1a Jeffersons Y haplo group which is important when reasoning human migration to demonstrate we share a common origin; the study these peoples DNA gave rise to genetic genealogy as we know it.

MN is the most convenient venue due to location of all parties, due to some evidence and proof being physically located in MN (Kensington Runestone, archeological finds related to first Europeans) , due to witnesses and other proof resting nearby in North and South Dakota, due to Native American archeological and intellectual property being located in and around MN and due to class member Al Franken as he sits as a Senator representing MN.

MN is next door to Canada who we truly believe holds the vault copies of Obamas records as he entered North America via Canada and then the US as an infant or so we allege, MN is next door to IL that is the state Obama claimed to represent as a Senator and is the last known address we have for Bill Ayers, and MN lies above the 49th parallel making it the northern most state in the 48 contiguous states which is relevant to the science in this case.

No other state besides Alaska lies above the 49th parallel. This has to do with Jefferson having correctly weighed the Earth and discerned a universal mean not Lord Calvert as Jefferson was closest to magnetic north; it also has to do with cartographers and why they rotated their maps so that North appears on the bottom as the map or compass matching the 1362 MN land claim is rotated as polar north is not the same thing as magnetic north.

MN is a neutral venue while any and all courts except SCOTUS that are geophysically located in DC are not for psychological reasons.

Rocky and Bullwinkle, fictional residents of fictional Frostbite Falls, MN who ask the federal question Whatsamotta U? and who wage a war against factual communism as personified by Boris and Natasha are already named in the federal record as it, the cartoon, is a creation that is uniquely American which is of relevance in a case regarding foreignization, who is or is not natural born and original, uniquely American intellectual property belonging to the class and to Thomas Jefferson and then all of the other American founders.

Over 5 million people live in MN; all 5 million have been injured but 2,910,369 may have been injured and harmed severely as 54.06 % of them voted for Obama Jr. while 43.82% voted for McCain when neither Obama or McCain are qualified to run, sit or serve as the Executive as they do not meet the requirements as proscribed by US law and US case law; Obama may not be a legal voter as our evidence and proof demonstrates as does our good math. The class has not found any existing conflict of interest present; the only connection between MN and Obama besides the vote for President is a list of 25 people who work in DC and/or for the current Administration and that itself is not a conflict per se as some of these people were born in MN while some spent time in MN; following are the names and positions of persons who might have a conflict as every state in the Union has a connection to Obama and DC like every person in the US and then the world has a connection to Obama and DC; once you name it out loud or on paper any conflict is negated as you place it within our conscious awareness:

Bill Burton Job: Deputy White House Press Secretary Minnesota connection: B.A., University of Minnesota

Kathy Hudson Job: Chief of Staff and Deputy Director, National Institutes of Health Minnesota connection: Carleton College graduate Mary Kendall Job: Inspector General of the Interior Department Minnesota connection: B.A. from St.Olaf College, J.D. from William Mitchell College of Law Steve Kosiak Job: Associate Director for Defense and International Affairs at the Office of Management and Budget Minnesota connection: B.A. in history and political science from the University of Minnesota Michele Leonhart Job: Acting Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration Minnesota connection: Grew up in St. Paul; graduate of Bemidji State University Denis McDonough Job: Deputy National Security Advisor to President Obama Minnesota connection: Stillwater, Minn.; B.A. St. John's University Tom Nides Job: Deputy U.S. Secretary of State for Management and Resources (No. 2 job at the State Department) Minnesota connection: Born in Duluth, educated at University of Minnesota Robert Petzel Job: Under Secretary for Health at the Veteran's Administration Minnesota connection: Born in Minneapolis; St. Olaf College graduate Semonti Stephens Job: Deputy Press Secretary to First Lady Michelle Obama Minnesota connection: Born in Crystal, Minn.; B.A. in political science and communication from Gustavus Adolphus College Jake Sullivan Job: Deputy Chief of Staff to the Secretary of State Minnesota connection: Went to school and practiced law at Faegre & Benson in Minneapolis; spent time as Amy Klobuchar's chief counsel before joining Hillary Clinton's campaign Paul Tewes Job: Political Consultant, Tewes-Hildebrand Minnesota connection: Born in Mountain Lake, Minn.; graduate of Carleton College Kevin Wolf Job: Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Administration Minnesota connection: M.A. in public affairs and law degree from University of Minnesota

STATEMENT OF CLAIM

7. Attached.

REQUEST FOR RELIEF

Injunctive, declaratory and monetary dependent upon the outcome of a federal question regarding money versus currency and Thomas Jeffersons unique, original intellectual property regarding a currency with a universal mean entered to the Congressional record in or around 1790; while claimants/petitioners have been damaged financially it is our contention that the paper debt fiat bill money system is intrinsically, inherently and fatally flawed as it is not to be found anywhere in US law. We can ask to be made whole but we cant ask the court to award us any money if our claim is money itself as it exists is not actual reality aka universal and is not in US law; its like asking us to name US paid Officers such as Eric Holder when we do not believe Holder or any other named paid Officer possesses any legal capacity whatsoever and when institutions such as the National Economic Council are wholly fabricated out of nothing as created in 1993 it is meant to promote what is policy only as none of these policies would be supported by anything universal and there is no such paid office under US law. Its made real by men but its not actual reality; its not scientific, theological (metaphysical) or constitutional reality.

We are naming money like we name Attorney General of the US, as a formality.

Signed this day, July 2nd, 2011.

Signature of Plaintiff

Susan Herbert

1100 Seagate Avenue 101 Neptune Beach, FL 32266 904.705.6171

Signature of Plaintiff Mailing Address

Brian Dobry

1100 Seagate Avenue 101

Neptune Beach, FL 32266 904.705.6171

For other plaintiffs see Signing after section titled The Plan To Vote within the complaint and before proof of service.

We complain:

1.

Barack Obama is not natural born, the US is in official default and has been since November 5th, 2008, a form of anarchy known as a kleptocracy reigns as Officers ignore and deny reality so now they are delusional, the fiat bill system is intrinsically, fatally flawed as debt money hence the IMF and US dollar has imploded so the Federal Reserve Chairman was forced to give interviews on television for the first time, the Supreme Court Justices are reasoning the original documents and so original motive and intent when the original jurisdiction seats were abandoned in 1871, 1914 and 1944/45 and when lawyers are arguing the 1871 inorganic government and that as of Marbury in 1803 no Judicial seat has been constitutionally set as to set them you must test Marbury eventually testing A Summary View as other nations are in denial as to the legal power and moral authority of the United States for America.

2.

Other nations ignore us, deny us, default upon loans, ask for aid, refuse to pay past due war loans, act as hypocrites and delusionally insist you can improve upon a form for which there is no improvement as no person has ever taken up A Summary View in order to prove it or Marbury and so they

use the excuse that SCOTUS is not legal or that our Revolutionary War win is no good as we have not lived out our own governing documents thus achieved equality. The only valid criticism hurled at us is that we have never argued nor applied the correct application of the EP&DP clauses so that what was once a Romantic Liberal form became a patriarchy that uses force and is male and that we have had weak, unfit, unable and incapable commanders but that is exactly what they seek: a global President who rules via committee, never acting independently, and in so doing gives the moral authority of the US to unjust nations thus falling beneath the bar and negotiating our safety against our will when an American never negotiates their safety. The planet is asking us to succumb to a gang mentality that has now infected all of Washington DC and the legal profession itself.

3.

The class is here to collect upon a long overdue war debt as we own the actual science to prove our claim of sovereignty and that The People are the constitutionally set government as the only actual office any person ever holds is their vote. The original American Founders have freed billions of people from oppression with the vote, even from beyond their graves. When the American Founders struck a blow against despotism they meant to kill it and by proving A Summary View, Marbury and that our documents are elegant, that they are actual science and are more perfect, we intend to finish the job they started.

4.

On August 2nd, 2011 the DC Trust formed in 1871 against our will and when women and persons who are nonwhite had no vote will enter bankruptcy as it cannot pay on a $14 trillion dollar debt. Nations who own the majority of this debt can and will foreclose on the US once the US defaults. But not if Susan Herbert moved to foreclose on the US first and was successful hence the IMF fell too as it was never legal and the unjust men involved knew it and so now other nations cannot afford to pay The People what they owe us. As I foreclosed on the Trust thereby the rest of Earth first and no objection came as I stated the whole truth aka actual reality than YOU owe US, The People.

What claim can any nation make against actual reality? If France borrowed money and so still owes us a debt for both WWI & II plus interest and now it owes us damages, what claim can it make that W I & WWII never happened? All France can do is pay up or concede. See last pages under The Plan To Vote.

5.

The People can make good on $14 trillion as our intellectual property is worth many times more than that amount so the rest of Earth owes us as we made ourselves solvent by gifting our intellectual property to The People not the DC Trust. The DC Trust then not The People is insolvent and bankrupt as it always was and always will be. Moral bankruptcy and financial bankruptcy go hand in hand. Check the Supreme Court record: I secured default first, on 11/05/08, as the US aka the DC Trust can may enter one answer alone, guilty, or it must fail to answer at all choosing default and it chose default thus concession (to prolong the agony, I suppose). If you install a foreigner as the Executive default is obvious but the unjust insist they must see the piece of paper so I secured it. I foreclosed on the unjust element across planet Earth on behalf of the constitutionally set government known as The People thus China owes us and exactly me for Korea, Vietnam and Iraq plus damages. As it cannot pay me what it owes me as that much money does not exist and even if it did money is not actual reality but only a lie you were led to believe? Then I thus The People own China and every other nation on Earth as they accepted aid from the US and failed to make any return and/or they all participated in the IMF when the IMF is a legal impossibility.

6.

As the IMF is dependent upon the 1871 Trust and the UN cant exist w/o it or us then FDR had to first create the IMF ceding the institutions to the IMF as thats all the 1871 incorporation is, institutions not constitutions, and later file the so-called UN Treaty fully knowing it wasnt legal. If FDR ceded anything he ceded DC to the IMF. The UN cant exist w/o the IMF first existing. If you create the IMF first then you cant have a legal Treaty with the UN. You cant cede anything to a nonexistent legal entity nor can you

enter a Treaty with a nonexistent entity as it wont exist until the IMF does. The UN might be standing; does it exist as a legal entity? Why build it if they might not come when you do? Its not legal reality if the Treaty was never filed and if its existence is dependent upon the IMF which in turn is dependent upon the 1871 Trust which MUST fail as its designed to fail or rather the DC Trust is intrinsically, fatally flawed as it was created. The vote DC casts in Congress not proscribed by law but by the DC Organic Act? That tips the balance of power in favor of death so it has to fail and will fail. Today we know: The Trust was broken irreparably when it failed to impeach Clinton on a charge of perjury. Clinton was installed in anticipation of the looming bankruptcy as unjust men now need to control you via controlling a commander in name only whos will is the will of the group not his own. Thus he or she will not act independently when bankruptcy is so America is ripe for a physical invasion and other nations will claim they have cause when in reality they do not. A foreign invasion is dependent upon your diminished capacity. Bill Clinton couldnt argue his way out of what is IS and Hilary Clinton, our current not legal Secretary of State, gave a speech in which she says that she did not know the CFR controlled the US until she was an adult or: Until her husband was installed in the Whitehouse when he was not qualified and when nobody ever heard of him. This speech is online; you read the transcript or you may watch the video of her saying this. Did you know at least two sitting Presidents and a Secretary of State legal or not truly believed that the Council on Foreign Relations not foreign nations but some private club orders us about? Obama truly believes this too. The Pentagon Papers were just published in their entirety so you your own self can read how at least two other Presidents, also the product of the DC Trust and two party monopoly, lied to you fully intending to deceive you re Vietnam.

7.

Unjust men did nothing but act to escalate the injury a criminals acts

like a criminal as is is a state of being - until finally DC cannot pay on August 2nd, 2011 when the payment is due but The People can, will and did make good on this $14 trillion. You cannot value what we own: Uniformity,

the actual structure of time and when life actually begins in the womb as well as what the force that causes our human heart to beat spontaneously looks like. Its knowledge that is priceless on its own but the advancements this knowledge leads to are also priceless; China would give us anything we asked for in order to receive the benefit of our intellectual property. What then is the only possible settlement as no nation can pay us what we are owed? The People then own the Earth and everything on it including all 6 billion or so humans. You can only pay what you owe in terms of people. Legally I then own you not the other way around as first I did it on my own and then I brought the class forward. China wont balk as we proved its nuclear threat is empty and then we developed the knowledge to meet and exceed any newer weapon it devises. I already tested my theory. Thats what Uniformity allows you to do, to see the invisible and to know the seemingly unknown. Conducting successful reconnaissance missions was easy for us as China doesnt get it: If money has become your opiate then we will let you get very drunk before we attack; buy all of the worthless debt you can as you are had. Its the same for the DC Trust for if youre reduced to committing crimes in plain sight yet denying your own words and actions then its only a matter of timing: Jefferson told us youd volunteer to die before you ever left office so we sat back and let you commit suicide. Recognizing logician Kurt Godels Incompleteness Theorem and a paradox I know the whole truth as its universal - I looked and as you will read in my Motion I discovered that the UN Treaty was filed 4 months after the IMF was created so it, both the UN and the IMF, were never any good. Note: We voted down the League of Nations twice so everyone knew if they were going to force the UN on us they would have to violate the spirit of the law as well as the letter. They did. As for other nations knowing? Great Britains Lloyds of London issued its first ever re-insurance policy against the DC Trust in 1871. Thus everyone knew the DC Trust and the IMF/UN were not lawful or even possible.

8.

This suit is brought under the 3 authorities that the Supreme Court of the United States accepts upon matters of exactly worded law: The

Declaration, The Constitution and The Federalist Papers as originally written as well as Marbury V Madison and A Summary View; it is also brought under USC suing a foreign nation. Foreign nations are not immune in this case. Under the FSIA, the burden of proof is initially on the defendant to establish that it is a "Foreign State," under the FSIA and therefore entitled to immunity. Foreign State" is defined at 28 U.S.C. 1603(a),(b). Once the defendant establishes that it is a Foreign State, for the lawsuit to proceed, the plaintiff must prove that one of the Act's exceptions to immunity apply. The exceptions are listed at 28 U.S.C. 1605, 1605A, and 1607. The most common exceptions are when the Foreign State waives immunity ( 1605(a) (1)) or agrees to submit a dispute to arbitration ( 1605(a)(6)), engages in a commercial activity ( 1605(a)(2)), commits a tort in the United States (such as a common traffic accident case) ( 1605(a)(5)) or expropriates property in violation of international law ( 1605(a)(3)). The FSIA also excludes immunity in cases involving certain counterclaims ( 1607) and admiralty claims ( 1605(b)). In addition, exceptions for torture, extrajudicial killing, aircraft sabotage and hostage-taking were added by amendment to the FSIA in connection with anti-terrorism law and updated again in 2008.

9.

Prior direct entry to SCOTUS via direct filing and admiralty, namely a clause written in Washingtons own hand, is to be given greatest weight as should an argument we own on behalf of the Voters of DC who were born in DC as they mistakenly believe they have no vote in Presidential elections when they do in another form, that the class can prove the Kensington Runestone now sitting in Alexandria, MN is authentic and is the missing piece of Hopi Tablet as its symbolic for the intellectual property that is the actual missing piece and the fact that no woman has ever secured the legal power and moral authority of her vote: No non-licensed lawyer or no voter and no woman has ever argued their own case before SCOTUS and that is only because lawyers refuse to stand aside or down. Lawyers, namely SCOTUS clerks, told me that unless you practice law for a profit or for personal gain or that unless you are willing to buy and sell human beings that you will not be

allowed entry and that they men exclusively in this case could and would prevent women from ever achieving equality.

10.

No nation on Earth has the ability and capacity that America has; no nation has ever achieved actual equality as they are all dependent and codependent upon the institutions other than their vote exactly as US lawyers now are. These nations deny reality but every one of them has a class system and/or or is welfare state and they vest their interest and their right in outside forms of profit such as paper money; Middle Eastern nation value themselves as barrels of oil which is a form of money while has told me that its currency is, of all things, cheese as in actual made from milk cheese. An Americans currency is their vote or their own person; its the honor bond. Americans cannot and may not enter an honor bound contract with nations that have none. We can and may sue; the Respondents do not have to appear and they do not have to answer for us to have the debate as they have already had 3 opportunities and declined them as an appearance on the SCOTUS docket via direct entry is notice of suit upon a world wide basis. Our Declaration states that we are acting as our petitions fell on deaf ears then and they fall on delusional ears now so no Respondent need appear for the case to proceed as we cannot debate a person who cannot reason or will not reason. It matters not why. The clerks of at least 3 federal courts including SCOTUS told us that they had zero intention of ever reasoning US law or applying it to anybody but paid Officers which they are. on behalf of The American People and courtesy of Art. I Sec. 8 as our direct entry to SCOTUS secured a universal copyright and patent.

11.

Abiding by the spoils of war rules as we won the war we could not possibly place the Earth in the mail plus there is a discrepancy between Calverts and Jeffersons measurements regarding the weight of Earth our claim is that Jefferson not Calvert has the correct weight and correct universal mean - so that even if the post office could weigh it, how much postage is due? That is, would they charge us for Calverts weight or for Jeffersons weight? Its a

federal question and then, figuratively and literally a global question; we call it greatest weight in the law for reasoning. We turned the Earth and everything on it into a SCOTUS petition once we proved US law to be elegant and proved Jefferson not Calvert, Everett not Bohr and Susan not Darwin or Hawking all Americans to be correct; then we affixed the seal, a 47 cent Liberty Forever postage stamp. Upon direct entry or actual delivery the Earth is ours according to the spoils of war rule as you must mail it from the country of origin and that is the US as the Revolution was fought here. If delivery then occurs as it did 3 times in our case? Its a lawful spoil of war accorded to the victor. These rules have always been upheld; my own family once owned spoils of WWII, Nazi and German artifacts supposedly taken in Belgium. Its symbolic as we are not a colonizing power: We covered every base, raising the bar as high as we could as that is what you must do if you set out to prove your form of government is the most perfect. To insure our claim we delivered a lawsuit to the World Court in DC asking this court to receive it but not file it so that jurisdiction remained in the hands of Americans as we have proof that no Justice ever saw our petitions no matter what the SCOTUS docket reads as the docket does not make any reasonable sense and the one thing Supreme Court Justices like all actual Americans are? Reasonable, as we rely and depend upon human ration. So then:

12.

Immunity for any person on Earth including Officers of the Judiciary does not exist due to the US officially defaulting upon November 5th, 2008 (see SCOTUS docket) and due to the Judiciary violating Marbury V Madison several times over; essentially lawyers as all clerks and judges I dealt with are lawyers reasoned the 1871 shadow government out of existence and then reasoned SCOTUS out of existence. I reasoned it back into existence via luring Obama to argue his own case at the 2010 State of the Union Address as I owned the knowledge Obama is not natural born and is actually unfit to serve in any capacity and that a document out of the state of GA existed regarding the Justices and naming the Chief Justice that had been transmitted to the Speaker of the House but was never addressed so the

Officers knew they, the Officers not the Justices, sat unlawfully. I will remind this court: Thomas is from GA. I have invoked Federal Code as it fell when this case first entered SCOTUS directly upon authority and original jurisdiction so we must place federal code on the table to then argue it back into existence.

13.

I, Susan, do have training as a lawyer via apprenticeship thus I know the nasty tricks law schools teach lawyers under the guise that they are protecting new, soon to be lawyers from criminal lawyers. You will find that these same tricks are played in all professions once corruption becomes the norm. Lawyers are taught to pursue outside forms of profit at the expense of The People. Profit and bribery can take any form; it is not always money; negative contracts are never good and sometimes a silent contract exists among lawyers, the wealthy and the sitting Officers all born in 1871 as even the title of the original Constitution was changed to then make the DC Trust or the Officers the rulers over or the enemy of The People. See Executive Order 100 and the Trading with the Enemies Act as these came into being when The People were at war with The People but as of 1871 they have been used by the paid Officers to make war against The People and this is a form of genocide.

14.

It is medical fact: if you deny actual reality actual US history long enough you will eventually veer into delusion and even temporary insanity. That is when a society explodes into violence and dies. A formerly great government is laid to waste as they refuse to change thus become just as what they refuse to do is give up forms of profit as they are physically and emotionally comfortable. The Officers have tried everything but justice; they have done everything they can and now desperately cling to the wreckage of what they have wrought. The one and only action the Officers have never taken? According women equality thus all people liberty as the correct application of the EP&DP clauses was lost on them as man and woman is the original separation of power as man and woman are the human qualities. See

attached as these clauses form a double helix when you draw your reasoning out as a diagram instead of with words.

15.

Constitutional reality is: The lone citizen may sue to enforce the Constitution as that is then enforcing your vote and blanket, impenetrable immunity from civil proceedings does not exist in US law as per Marbury as the Chief Justice, John Marshall, told The People to return if the denial of the paper ever became the denial of the right itself thus delivery of the paper would occur and it has. Now it must be recognized. Marbury is legal or rather constitutional. The class understood that the denial of the paper would occur when a foreigner was installed as President, genocide began to occur or when and if SCOTUS installed a man who did not argue his own case as SCOTUS issues opinions only so that unjust men who are lawyers would have to realize an oligarchy to do this at the expense of women and so all of America.

16.

As all three of the above conditions have been met and default is The Voters, as the only federal office we hold is our vote as the government is The People, must now set themselves constitutionally as individuals and in their legal capacity or else they remain in default and no contract exists. Your vote IS your legal capacity. The Judiciary must set itself constitutionally and then every citizen must do so; naturally then the other branches of government are re-set as seats of original jurisdiction. To that end The People have begun filling seats of original jurisdiction as The People were legally, officially recognized by the US Military when Congress balked at the filling of the original gubernatorial seats thus sent our claim ahead to the Military who sided with us; The People have been sitting in Congress ever since most recently in St. Charles, MO and Neptune Beach, FL. See attached Motion. The judge is to act as a fulcrum setting his or her self and then The People vote upon informed consent setting themselves; The People decide this case as The People decide every case as US law is a matter of voluntary compliance not force as force is used by despots and fascists the very form

we liberated ourselves from. The People decide the case their case - every four years. This case does one other thing:

17.

It establishes the body of law known as American common law as no writ existed to cover my unique situation or the class situation so I wielded my vote as an Executive Order a form of a writ unique to America - that I have always been able to uphold. Great Britain does not have the vote or Executive Order; it only seems as if they have an actual vote. See Petition 07-9804. Once my Executive Order was executed? The People were no longer beholden to law known as British common law. American common law was born as the body of law known as US case law constitutes American common law as after SCOTUS and after the President and Commander come The People as a whole or as one lone citizen as the Chief Justice and the President embody The People and stand aside or down one another (or they are supposed to do so). In actual reality we never were beholden to British law; law school taught what is a lie; I know this as absolute fact as once my Intro to Law Professor said we resorted to British common law? The British person in the class never came back again as theres no hope if thats true; nobody understood: I, Susan, would never petition the King or Queen of England so its not the British people who come after SCOTUS and the Executive but the American people. As for buying my way into Supreme Court heaven via the purchase of a judicial indulgence known as a fee, a certification or a law license? Dont make me laugh; whats BVG worth besides the paper and ink used to create it? Nothing! In America liberty and justice is not for sale as The People arent.

18.

The Proof of Life Cases seeks declaratory and injunctive relief; it reserves the right to seek other damages in order to be made whole due to the very nature of this case as money is anti-constitutional as it is not based upon anything in this universe and so it is not found in US law. Paper money is as Jefferson said the ghost of money. Currency is the law while money is a

means to commit criminal acts yet seemingly suffer no consequences; money is a false and deceptive illusion only. Jefferson created an elegant currency based upon an intrinsic or universal value in order to defeat a currency bill; although he did defeat that bill his currency was not adopted by Congress for lack of independent scientific confirmation which this class now has. Once we argue or debate the point of law we might ask for money if it is brought in line with The Constitution as originally written and with law of this universe rather than a mans arbitrary whim and will.

19.

What standard do the Officers use to determine value currently? None. Later you will read that we began to argue in the negative in our courts; we also began to enter the realm of imaginary numbers in re our money as it now costs more than one cent to mint a penny thus the current vale is a negative one. You can and may leave the gold and silver standard; if you do your money is not free floating as unless you establish a standard then its arbitrary, popular and transient. Liberty and justice is our standard but no person was ever able to reduce this to a numerical value that could be scientifically confirmed until now as thats what Jeffersons work constitutes plus we left the gold standard under: Nixon, so ego became our standard exactly like the Romans and Greeks before they fell. Economists call our dollar free floating but it is not; in actuality its anchored to personal judgment values so its not universal.

20.

We are aware no judge wants to read an overly long complaint. We shortened it as much as possible without removing crucial information a judge may need such as information about Jeffersons work. The reason we did not hit you over the head with US case law is simple: You hear it every day of your lives; rather than insult your intelligence we have chosen to cite the entire Declaration, Constitution and Federalist Papers as they the 3 authorities SCOTUS accepts in matters of law as we are asking about exactly worded law. Then 300 million of us and even 6 billion of us have a common understanding. Also we have entered ALL US case law as we will be

establishing the body of law known as American common law as after the Chief Justice and the President is The People; specific cases like Morrison, Monell V DSS and Olech V Willowbrook have been cited already in other documents entered to the record and/or directly to SCOTUS.

21.

Our goal is to restore law and order and liberty for over three generations of Americans have not felt liberty. It may seem scary at first but you will soon see: You, the reader, have been a victim or a victimizer so the scary feeling you have is a marker of the injury you have suffered and if we do not cite it then we cannot argue it debate it - as we entered SCOTUS directly. You are supposed to feel the emotions you do and you are supposed to fell as if you hit a wall of information as you read this suit and other documents as its meant to heal the injury as a part of US law is emotional as mercy, compassion, and liberty are human emotions. If you feel shame and humiliation that does not mean you are guilty; guilt is not a human emotion but a state of being and a higher order instinct. If you feel shame so believe you are guilty? That is the injury; its the skewing of your emotional compass due to authoritarian rule as you have never, ever felt or experienced actual liberty, actual guilt and/or actual human grief. Just because we cite 1871 and/or everything that came after it does not mean we intend to dismantle it. Before you begin an example would be the Federal Reserve and IRS:

22.

Somebody has told millions of Americans they do not have to pay tax; no where did our Founders propose this; their idea is just taxation. The IRS may not be legal now as it came to exist but does that mean you never pay tax not even after adjudication in person? If just taxation is due what means do you use to account for taxation as the IRS is an accounting house? The Federal Reserve is private not public. Currently it claims the value of a US dollar is totally dependent upon the whim and will of unjust men; we experienced Alan Greenspan as Federal Reserve Chairman claiming numbers are the market as if they are sapient so he could not understand why the market people not numbers would not behave itself when he

couldnt behave himself. See my world court suit. Also things like deflation and inflation are not actual reality but only real as they are the effects of the fantasy fiat bill debt money system. Deflation and inflation are not universal or natural law but only made up by men. However reason would tell you that even if you examine Jeffersons intellectual property and decide to implement his elegant currency obviously you would still need something like the Federal Reserve to coin a representative currency and the IRS to account for itthe Federal Reserve like the IRS could be easily fine tuned to be made constitutional. We are in no way suggesting you toss everything out that we have built over the last 100 years or so since 1871 and begin from scratch. We arent advocating a redistribution of monetary wealth whereby we pick your pockets. That seems to be a common misunderstanding when reading this suit, as does the fact that in our attempts to shorten it we inevitably leave out information a judge does not have nor was he or she ever taught it:

23.

I, Susan Herbert, re-discovered Jeffersons measurements when a historian stated that the English language seems to have sunk him as it seems to sink me. Nobody was taught what his measurements mean or are. Every single physicist missed this as they blindly believed people like Bohr, Penrose and Hawking when those people blindly believed Calvert! Not one lawyer ever revisited A Summary View as: Law school told them it was not humanly possible when A Summary View is our original model. If we leave information out a federal judge seems to believe that we cannot make our case; if we leave it in a federal judge seems to think we mean and intend to make our case within our complaint or that we do not know what we are doing. We are aware how awkward this case sounds on paper; it does not sound like this in person. See the attachment re American English. On paper you are forced to repeat yourself at times as if you are beginning again partly because we already entered SCOTUS directly and partly because of the nature of the English language and as paper is flat and two dimensional then the appearance of paper is always deceptive: you cannot know the

emotional truth based upon paper alone

as you are driven by your own

subconscious mind, you never met us in person and you are filtering the truth through your own belief system which may not be elegant. It may be your truth alone not anybody elses. This is one reason why SCOTUS has opined that you may not dismiss based upon the appearance of the paper alone: it constitutes discrimination and prejudice; it ignores and denies reality - substance, or, content of character.

24.

The class, especially the three persons who volunteered to act as counsel, do know what they are doing; we have listened to oral argument out of several circuits including SCOTUS. All three members of counsel are uniquely qualified in various fields and/or due to unique physical ability and capacity. Every exactly named class member has unique proof of life, unique testimony as to their experience of life as an actual American, to give. Weve been voting to plan and planning to vote our whole lives. We do not have unrealistic ideas as to the task ahead of us or the kinds and types of questions that will be asked of us; we also know there is a legal burden of proof and a scientific burden of proof to meet. To hammer our point of law home we have also met the metaphysical or spiritual burden of proof as our Founders gave US law a sense of spirituality with deliberation and A Summary View is itself metaphysical in nature. At least one member of the class has trained as a lawyer, Charles Rangel, and another acted as a federal judge, Henry Adams. Another ethical lawyer has volunteered for service so the documents can be made more professional at a later date although that is not a necessity.

25.

Most Americans view the test of the natural birth clauses as being antiObama. Rather than thinking of this suit as anti-Obama as it is not personal you should think of it as pro-America as Earthlings might believe Sun Tzu wrote the definitive book on the Art of War but Sun Tzu has nothing on the Americans who perfected the art of Constitutional War. Once we appeared

on the SCOTUS docket directly as SCOTUS clerk Jeff Atkins and I could no longer deny criminal activity had occurred on the SCOTUS clerks office? The criminal was adjudicated as you hear treason within SCOTUS. We had to make our case or else direct entry would not be. We are not concerned with actual jail; instead we are focusing on the truth of US law, liberty and informed consent so that the Voters may set themselves and leave default. They then re-enter the honor bound contract with the 2012 election. To cut to the quick see # 95 and then go to # 294 law. re Nationality Act & US case

26.

The problem/s seem large but they are not; when you realize endemic corruption and then criminal corruption apply Occams razor. This Gordian knot is very easy to undo. There are a few simple questions you can ask to then solve every one of the problems we have including endemic, generational poverty, prejudice against women, illiteracy, autism, failing schools, a dilapidated physical infrastructure that is about to come crashing down around our heads and segregation. All those things are forms of injustice. Our whole proposition as a government is that you CAN you act but then you suffer the consequences both good and bad as that then leads to ownership of knowledge aka the whole truth. No human being ever actually escapes the consequences of guilt only as he escapes a paper conviction! No human being ever escapes a reward only as they are never paid in paper dollars! Some awards are not within the power of SCOTUS or any man to give to you so you alone claim them. Consequences are they exist independent of pieces of paper as universal law is at work. What, people did not suffer any consequences good or bad before paper was invented? Paper was invented around the 2nd century BC in China; before that? Universal law was at work and always was. It still is. Theres one source and all of reality is the product of the interaction of the universal law.

27.

The universe does not exist only as you say it does and then you write it down. A Justice does not opine that proven universal law such as gravity bending light is not only as he says so on paper. Thus suddenly gravity does not bend light. Gravity bends light no matter what you and your paper says. America exists no matter what BVG reads or no matter how long Obama sits in the actual Whitehouse. Rumors of a promised land America - existing have been circulating since the Great Deluge. Rumors of my vote existing have been circulating since A Summary View. The problems are not so large once you examine Jeffersons measurements and understand he already proved A Summary View in such a way it stands up to the rigors of a hardcore scientific test upon a matter of universal law. So then:

28.

This is the test of Marbury, A Summary View and the natural birth clauses. Its also a test of the 19th amendment as it has never been made actuality but has been good only on paper so no woman has ever been accorded the power or authority of her vote thus this is a test of the power of one as: Every voter has a mother. Every voter is made up of cells that are each the product of an egg and sperm. No voter can divest himself of man or woman as that is to divest yourself of your humanity thus your vote. As I, a woman named Susan and at least one member of counsel, a man named Ray Morton, never divested ourselves of either man or woman and always upheld our vote in defense of The People foregoing any and all profit and even volunteering to be tortured only for our inviolate faith in US law thus in The People?

29.

Thomas Jefferson the constitutional authority is alive and well and Jefferson not Lord Calvert correctly weighed the Earth as he, Jefferson, had the mean Isaac Newton proposed in Principia while Calverts original model is no good. This then led Ray Morton and I to resolve Uniformity via pursuing a case of authority and original jurisdiction within SCOTUS as to make such a case you must first live out US law as originally written your own self to then own the knowledge of it! You: Could not participate in corruption or any

criminal activity whatsoever. You need to have: CLEAN HANDS. Ray and I do as does Susan Clemons who came to have clean hands but who does not possess the absolute and pure legal standing Ray or I possess. Naming Jefferson as part of the class was not a stunt or a joke:

Thomas Jefferson yet survives as does America. So then:

30.

We won the Revolution and we own the knowledge of it thus you can dress it up any way you wish but the 1871 version of the Constitution, the legal profession itself, the currently sitting Officers and Obama are still red, still un-American and still hierarchal, patriarchal and unjust when US law is not designed this way so it can only be that the people are unjust. Today they are mentally ill and inorganically insane, delusional and King George or Rudolph Hess crazy, as they did it to themselves via denying reality to then deny the truth and denying women liberty with deliberation to then deny everyone justice, even their own persons. My absolute proof of life is the fact that no woman has ever appeared in person before SCOTUS to defend the class to make her own case like Marbury and Thurgood Marshall thus women have never been accorded the legal power of their vote and if a woman attempts to secure it via moral authority she is injured and /or killed as thats what fascists and despots do incapacitate you by breaking your will via use of physical, emotional and sexual force. Im the absolute proof as are the other members of the class as people and their actions are the absolute proof in America. For the vote of a woman to be actualized? An ethical woman would have to serve as President, Chief Justice and/or argue her own case before SCOTUS.

31.

Unjust men also deny the fact that women can be and are actual geniuses. Unjust men actually believe that women are defective by their nature and can never, ever produce what is actual genius although they deny this in public. This would be the hidden discrimination women encounter in all

facets of life; every single time a woman strikes out independently a man claims she is the exception to the law and the rule! That is a lie men tell themselves and each other; there is no factual basis for that rationalization. This is partly why a woman has never been allowed into SCOTUS to make her own case, as the male clerks I dealt with were in denial; they denied a person w/o a law degree could argue in person or that a woman could argue as if genius and as if birth belonged to men alone. Check the record as the only person I found who argued their own case before SCOTUS was a man who is a licensed lawyer. SCOTUS has assigned lawyers to voters but in this case they cant as only we can adequately and vigorously make the case and as I, Susan, am the very first citizen to be certified legally by a state as forever pro se. In a court ruling out of NY I was certified as being forever pro se, or, no lawyer can ever represent me as no lawyer was there for every event in my life. See Austin V Herbert, NY. Actual reality is:

32.

Our experience has been that men are jealously guarding the ability to give birth to intellectual property as they cannot give birth to human babies. Women give birth all ways; men do not give birth to babies. Women who then participate in the corrupted process to become a part of the unjust elite then act to become men as what they become is a part of a gang mentality and so they are politicized in exactly the way Marbury states you may not be. As everybody is corrupted as its endemic and as no point of reference exists as this case has not yet been heard in person then you cannot rouse them from their stupor. They, paid Officers both male and female, become: delusional. If you wonder why I, Susan, did not come forward sooner than 2007? I chose not to come forward until I had every answer to every question up to and including Roe V Wade as Sandra Day OConnor is correct: Roe V Wade was on a collision course with itself: A woman, as only women become pregnant and give birth. A nation cannot be just and no government will ever succeed if it denies over half of its population, women or the very persons who give birth to the constitutionally set government known as The People, liberty and justice.

33.

I, Susan, needed to be certain of my science as a judge will need the science the actual science not what is scientific only. Something may be scientific but that does not then make it THE actual science or the law at work. Also I needed to exhaust the entire judiciary to measure and weigh the injury as almost every sitting judge w/o exception went to law school thus was indoctrinated or was subjected to indoctrination - to know how far the injury and harm had progressed as every injury has a pathology. I, Susan, was not ready in that I still needed some answers and I had to exhaust NYs highest court, Appeals, as NY State is DENYING their own reality. NY State does not have the human ability to overcome the conflicts present in family cases involving domestic violence let alone federal cases. So then as the class is not delusional: See Sol Wachler, former Chief Judge of NY. NY is endemically, criminally corrupted.

34.

To believe that Barack Obama is natural born, a legal voter, a genius, a constitutional lawyer, a college graduate, a person with post doctoral credit, the author of Dreams Of My Father, a lawyer who argued cases, a CIA operative, a statesman, a Hawaiian, a wunderkind, a Senator from IL not HA and that he is named Barry Sotero or Barack Obama Jr. on his actual birth certificate and that he is more able and capable than any American woman or that he is anything he claims to be is to be delusional your own self as NOTHING exists to support these falsified facts and Obama himself cannot function unless somebody else does the work, somebody else puts the words in his mouth or he is using somebody elses work and signing anonymous or a name that is not actually his. Marbury is your actions not your pieces of paper prove you. Is it actual reality, is it US and universal law, or is it only real in your own head? You can win a majority vote and you can run around calling yourself that title but was it ever legal? Was it ever reality or was it only your personal real based upon your personal wants? US law provides for no such thing as the popular vote as it sank every other formerly great government and as its usually based upon passion when passion is

transient. Not once has Obama voluntarily complied with the EP&DP clauses and not once did he ever earn anything on his own. Or so we believe, allege or claim; we fully understand we are formally alleging even if we have proved it absolutely; we know its Or so we allege. The reason we named Obama, the US and Bill Ayers only in the case caption is: We do not seek a civil conviction or a criminal conviction in civil court.

35.

I have seen a single piece of work that Obama Jr. signed and supposedly entered to Columbia to justify the bill he generated and submitted to the CIA and it is nearly incomprehensible. I know why as the state of Massachusetts told me: Minor autism, an affliction children all over the US suffer from but that has been labeled literacy and so dumped upon teachers. When MA teachers told me that while children can read and write what they cannot do is make the single largest deduction to be made so they cannot communicate ideas in written form thus are illiterate as the definition of this word has changed? I knew why Obama could not write a coherent paragraph; he has the very same affliction the children in MA have: You must give him the idea or he cannot function.

36.

Major autism is when a child cannot make the smallest connection in order to communicate with the outside world; minorly autistic children live wholly outside of themselves as they have no sense of self, personal, national, global or universal. They are ego driven or they act upon ego. The children I have interviewed have never felt id due to conditioning by their families and their community. Both conditions result from a denial of liberty and I even know why majorly autistic Temple Grandin seems to exert actual genius: I can name the cause of autism, actual causation, and then every single factor that is causal and casual. You can compare Grandin to myself and ask What is the same and what is different? to know most of the answers. MA told me that not only did their children experience a denial of liberty but that the majority of their students never learned formal English and spoke a language

other than English at home as the largest pool of these children immigrated to the US. [Obama was raised mostly outside of the US.]

37.

Jefferson said: The new circumstances under which we are call for new words, new phrases and for the transfer of old words into new objects. An American dialect therefore will be formedMeanwhile necessity obliges us to neologize. And should the language of England remain stationary, we shall probably enlarge our employment of it, until its new character may separate it in name as well as in power. The Declaration is regarded as the birth of American English. John Adams said, English is destined to be in the next and in succeeding cenutries more generally the language of the world than Latin was in the last or French is in the present. To be a native speaker of English you NEED to have the experience of having been raised here as American not British English is uniform or equal but distinct or colloquial and then unique or conversational. Jefferson correctly predicted the rise of dialects and I have studied this my entire life as I have been to 47 states and as I have a port accent I figured out a riddle that linguists could not solve: My port accent? Its actually an accent from Queens, NY. When reasoning law if you are not schooled in formal English and if you did not have the experience of being raised surrounded by native speakers of American English former colonial powers speak British English then your language centers have been affected thus its about how a human processes language via perception, experience and context. Horace Greely said, Our nationality which answers to the name American is neither the center of a large continent nor is it floating loosely around its, East, West and Tropical coastlines and harbors. It is a language. Correct, as it, American, is a state of being and American English perfectly reflects this IF you are raised here while its possible to overcome this if you were not raised here from infancy its extraordinarily difficult to overcome this barrier due to neuroscience known as emotion dumping and as humans can and do communicate without words but only emotions and body language. So-called wild children who received little or no human contact as infants no stimulation never, ever develop the ability to communicate the fine nuances of language. While they

can form complex ideas and convey them its the nuance of language like the nuance of US case law thats lost to them forever. America? We dump liberty on ourselves and each other! Language is integral then. These MA children might have learned formal rules but they never experienced liberty in the context of America.

38.

These children are ego driven as they were raised to truly believe in authoritarian rule that to blindly obey rule is to be a good person while to disobey rule for any reason is to be a bad person - and know nothing but a system of punishment and reward thus they NEVER take any action unless they will receive a reward. They never experienced the reward known as liberty: a construct, an emotion and a state of being. Success and happiness is measured by popularity and what is an affectation only. I can and will produce these MA teachers. Their testimony has already been recorded. These teachers mistakenly pursued the incorrect solution thus all they did is teach children a production line type of thinking so while standardized test scores rose the children received no actual benefit and no actual remedy and relief.

39.

This then reasons why Americans seem to be becoming so dumb as compared to other nations as we are slowly losing ground as we lower the bar rather than raise it. When you deny reality and refuse to deal with the actual state of things as they exist then you enter delusion and so become dumb as to do this you must act not upon higher order instinct but upon animalistic drive and your subconscious mind. Thus Japan claiming that its literacy rate is nearly 100% is exactly like its claim that its rate of criminal convictions is nearly 100% - its a false appearance only as the Japanese have no liberty and no actual vote. These children do exactly what Obama does: They cannot tell the truth and cannot write to save their lives; theoretical thinking is beyond them and logic is wholly made up. They cannot make the simplest, most obvious, most self-evident deduction on their own as they are crippled. They are wholly dependent upon another person GIVING

them the intellectual property; unlike Obama the children in MA learned a set of skills or tricks to then help them make a deduction but actual logic thus actual critical thinking is absolutely lost to these children. THEY COME TO TRULY BELIEVE AS INVIOLATE LAW ANYTHING YOU DICTATE TO THEM. Or so we allege. See the attachment.

40.

If you check the record and another article that ran in New York Magazine, Barack Obama Jr. is reported to be very anxious to see the speeches that are written for him. Yes, as he needs somebody else to give him the ideas or else he cannot produce. Millions and millions of Americans have been commenting upon how they have noticed Obama cannot function at all unless he has a teleprompter or words on paper before him; millions of Americans witnessed Obama become crippled when a teleprompter had a technical difficulty. We believe: Obama suffers from exactly what these MA teachers described and it is a disability that prevents him from acting as President and Commander even if he were constitutionally set which he is not or so we allege.

41.

Barack Obama is a convincing illusion, an illusion only, however he did not so much as tempt most of the members of the class. As the exactly named class members and named counsel and I have traced this injury, propaganda thus liberty denied, back to Marxism, Stalinism, Leninism, WWI & II, post-war physical comfort or physical prosperity, educational reform and the rise of standardized testing as well as the abandonment of new math? This illusion then would fool at least three generations of Americans who have been deluded and defrauded by the sitting Officers and who are suffering from the very injury Thurgood Marshall told us to guard against as he proved it existed with his films of: GIRLS. The citizens have been injured and lethally so by the prejudice against women that this nation steadfastly refuses to let go of and that it denies exists but only as the sitting Officers want and need prejudice to exist or else they cant exploit and control the public. They create the need in actuality it is their want not an actual need - as they

need to be needed by you. What they need is for you to believe this thus vest your interest and your right in them rather than in yourself. Or so we allege.

42.

One deceptive illusion most voters know of is Obama says he went to Columbia and that the CIA paid for it. Obama made his CIA connection known. A bill has been published that seems to support that the CIAs business front did pay for something for Obama Jr. I, Susan, know Obama CANNOT fulfill any contract with the CIA so Obama committed fraud. I, Susan, happen to be an expert where the CIA is concerned. I can and will prove it in court; I will out expert via a legal argument former CIA director Bush Sr. If the CIA paid for the incomprehensible piece of work I myself read that Obama Jr. claimed? The CIA would never pay for this if they read it and knew this was all Obama had the capacity to produce. Obama had to promise them something he could never ever deliver but first: Obama could not fulfill the Declaration and Constitution.

43.

The CIA is not wrong; it merely made an actual mistake due to its very nature that I can reason fully in court or for the CIA as in secret is the delusion itself as if we cannot know the truth when we can and as if there are secrets when there arent in actuality; the mistaken belief is as long as your actions are in secret then you are not guilty. The CIA? It cannot recruit from the left ever or else it loses ability as proven by both Clinton and Obama as they were recruited for the leftist leanings and family histories. Here is the best way to say this: The CIA is a secret police force that operates in the open but not in uniform however it wears disguises thus you cannot recruit from the left or you lose the human ability to distinguish actual reality from the illusion as those boundaries seem to dissolve once you recruit from the left. So then:

44.

Is the faculty at Columbia guilty of fraud? That seems to be the case as no professor could read this work and give it a grade other than F as this is POST DOCTORAL work or its supposed to be. [Note: I, Susan, and the members of the class, have never, ever seen any other work Obama actually took credit for; its a pattern his mother exhibits or displayed as she would go so far as to change a single letter in her name to then never commit to her true beliefs. One American composed a list of known names Stanley Anne Dunham went by and its extraordinarily long. Interestingly she changed her name on her thesis. The only piece of work entered to the Law Review attributed to Obama is signed Anonymous. Not taking credit for his work, not entering work that is his own and not voting or being present when votes were taken is or constitutes a pattern in Obama Jr.s life and in his nuclear family: They do not commit or tell the truth and they do not ever allow you to know their true selves; they believe paper is the proof. Obama seems to have taken credit for this lone piece of work I found to then justify the bill he generated and that the CIA seems to have paid, or, to be able to say in a court of law that he did do at least one piece of work thus to place blame on the CIA. The pattern we noticed is: Obama Jr. is forever trying to establish that he has a case exactly like the people that raised him.]

45.

How did voters ever come to believe Obama was natural born, went to Columbia and could reason law plus function on his own thus could fulfill the oath of office? As if the possibility exists when it does not? Thats a question the CIA might like to ask Columbia as they are not talking. I have a copy of the purported bill as Id have to follow it through the GAO & IRS records to confirm it is authentic (thats easy for me to do) and so this is nothing more or less than an act of treason on Columbias and Obamas part as those involved meant and intended for it to seem as if the CIA deliberately installed Obama thus is protecting him when they are not. [The class is not disturbed that the CIA has a business front as theres reasoning for it and as any American can know as its not hidden from us.]

46.

The class reunion speaker for that graduating year at Columbia said not one person recalled Obama attending Columbia and that Columbia could not reason away why they asked him not Obama to speak. He said Obama is not in their yearbook and that he himself called his classmates and not one person had any memory of Obama. Obama did not attend Columbia; Obama might have been named on a register or even on a class list and a bill might have been generated and a bill might have been paid but Obama never attended Columbia. As for Harvard? Obama did not apply; he got in upon a recommendation made by an absolute stranger. Occidental? Scholarship, but what kind? For what actual scholarship? as there is none. I, Susan, am an expert as is other counsel:

47.

I was not only voted most scholarly in my class but I am an actual scholar as I developed the field known as constitutional physics; I describe constitutional physics as the science of political philosophy as the perceptual, experiential and contextual search for the truth drives America and everything in this universe is political as John Marshall said. Its the nature of homo sapiens: We are political as we know and we act. Obama and his handlers acted to seal his academic records , passport records and other records as they cannot have anyone knowing the truth. Name what you read on or in a persons college transcript and college records. You read more than a single or lone letter grade. The problem they have now is: no person ever needed to see a single sheet of paper to make this case as human beings cannot prevent their truth their conscious and subconscious awareness from being realized; a human does not know his subconscious mind so until or unless he does it will reveal itself no matter what a human does to mask it or hide it. Thats basic psychology. Or so we allege.

48.

IN AMERICA LIVING PEOPLE ARE THE ABSOLUTE PROOF NOT THE PAPER AS YOUR ACTIONS ARE THE PROOF AND THE CONSTITUTIONALLY SET GOVERNMENT IS THE PEOPLE. YOUR TRUTH IS REALIZED AS: THE STATE OF THE NATION AKA THE STATE OF THE PEOPLE.

49.

I, Susan, was in NYC with Obama or rather at the same time. I know facts about Obama, Columbia and NYC that no other person can give 1st person testimony to as I was there; I am a living first person eyewitness to history. Every person I have taken testimony from has history to tell and it never matches the fantasy Obama wants and now desperately needs you to believe. Barack Obama Jr. has a life story that changes constantly and nothing Obama Jr. or those in his employ claim matches what living witnesses testify to or so we allege.

50.

I met Barack Obama and I am telling you that nothing that comes out of this mans mouth is the truth as he lacks the human ability to tell the truth and that is because he has no sense of self and now he has a deluded sense of self that is like a doubled down delusion as it itself is not based upon anything that is the truth of Obamas actual life. Obama has told so many lies about himself he has deluded himself or he never knew the truth to begin with thus adopted a lie as his truth. A former associate testified on national television to this as at the time the Nobel Prize was announced this insider was stunned when Obama acted to claim it as if Obama is these things and had accomplished what is named. He said it was only then that he understood that Obama had actually come to believe the lies everyone agreed to tell and that he could no longer discern who had succumbed to delusion and who had not so he bolted; he was apologizing as he had agreed to tell these same lies in exchange for personal gain exactly like every other person involved and now he had to wonder: did he ever have a contract with Obama or did Obama truly believe the lies they told such as you are a genius from day one? Obamas childhood babysitter confirmed Obama had no sense of self and only came to have a deluded one at the Nobel Prize announcement: her testimony is Barack Obama never fussed as a baby; she said she did not like to say this as it made him sound not real (not real are her exact words) but she had zero memory of him ever fussing unlike any other baby she has known. A baby without a sense of self will not fuss;

babies fuss as they have likes and dislikes. As a baby Obama suffered anything; you could inflict any condition upon him and he accepted it without objection of any kind. Its not humanly possible for Obama to be the person he and his owners claim he is. Its not humanly possible that he lived the life he claims he lived. For that to be possible Obama would have to be a man who is superman. Obama Jr. would have to be a power greater than nature itself. All of this this testimony is on the record. Or so we allege.

51.

Intellectualism is not genius and genius of and by itself is not wisdom. Obama can read all about the EP &DP clauses; he can memorize other peoples work regarding the application of these clauses. That in no way makes him a genius or wise. Do you know how many meaningless A+ and 100% the members of the class have received in their lifetimes? How many meaningless gold stars we have been given? Wisdom is earned via life experience if you live what you claim to truly believe and what you know to be law of this universe as then your action leads to ownership of all that knowledge you have memorized for standardized tests like the SAT or LSAT. The LSAT measures nothing currently as you have aptitude or not; you cannot study or cram and so memorize aptitude and there happens to be an error in every post war logic textbook I have ever examined and it now appears on the LSAT as the cat with hot buttered toast on its back is not a logic problem but is propaganda as you cannot deduce what you are being asked to deduce; when you see kids studying not learning so they can pass the LSAT? They have been indoctrinated. I was first made aware this error appeared on the LSATS in 2001; the injury escalated until it began appearing on the LSATS.

52.

I believe one of the problems we are dealing with regarding logic is deduction versus induction. I say this another way: Looking outside yourself or looking inside yourself. Apparently people do not know some problems are not logic problems per se in that you apply induction not deduction. However

you do not make up or fabricate induction anymore than you fabricate logic as its universal law or not. To make this case and create this complaint the class used both. Also there are two kinds or types of induction philosophical and mathematical. They are not the same. Philosophical inductive reasoning, also known as induction or inductive logic, is a kind of reasoning that constructs or evaluates inductive arguments. The premises of an inductive logical argument indicate some degree of support (inductive probability) for the conclusion but do not entail it; that is, they suggest truth but do not ensure it. Your conclusion may be false even if your premise/s are true, fact and correct. Induction usually involves conditions and generalizations and is about the possibility of a false conclusion existing. Mathematical induction is not the same as you prove if one statement in an infinite sequence is true then so is every other statement. I USED MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION TO PROVE THE CASE THUS PROVE US LAW. Several websites I looked at used standing dominoes falling to symbolize mathematical induction. That is a good symbolic reference but it does not apply to legal or constitutional or philosophical induction: What if one of your dominoes does not fall thus the chain is severed or the ending is false? Lawyers are using philosophical induction only; to date I have not found any other case using both philosophical and mathematical induction and globally no legal case using mathematical induction as proof as your law would have to match physics (actual science) and only ours does. Thus judges are led to false conclusions even if the lawyer is telling the truth and even if the facts are true. Nobody is checking the math or the actual science and nobody is checking the original model. Mostly: Lawyers are lying with deliberation for profit as nobody is checking their own self or so we allege.

53.

Also, the class has found that people do not understand inclusive counting; I have found most lawyers do not understand inclusive counting. An example and a bad one is: If Jesus died on Friday how is it 3 days on Sunday? Its 3 days if you include Friday but only 2 days if you do not. The reason I claim this is not a good example is scientists justify it and so demonstrate

inclusive counting by making the claim you count from noon on Friday. Incorrect as thats still not 3 days on Sunday plus they failed to account for Paul destroying the idols to Diana the Moon or Monday god of pagans who were worshipping graven images. Inclusively Friday, Saturday and Sunday is 3; non-inclusively its only 2 days from Friday to Sunday. If you start at zero point then counting to four but include zero as a numerical value then you have five not four numbers. If you start at one and count to four you have four numbers. Im at zero point however Im not excluded but included. Im inclusively counting myself as thats equality and thats id. Its the nature of US law as infinite and as an open-ended system. If you confuse these concepts you can completely change a legal argument thus forcing a judge to change the law in a ruling; you might do it mistakenly or you might do it deliberately. One of the reasons we petitioned in every district and sometimes twice over was to define the injury and discern what Voters including lawyers and judges are confused about and this is one of the ideas they do not know or never learned; they might know it but they do not own the knowledge; this confusion especially harms people who are the victims of prejudice.

54.

I, Susan, discovered on May 8th, 2011 that Voters did not know what induction is or how philosophical or mathematical induction is different. While timeliness no longer counts due to the facts, the actual science and the federal questions (at least one SCOTUS filing clerk agreed), the class cannot address something nobody is willing to admit. Our experience is: constitutional lawyers (including all paid Officers even judges) and physicists are not willing to admit when they are mistaken or in error; neither are authoritarians by their very nature. As John Paul II once contacted me via third party it seems as if the theological authorities are willing to admit to actual reality, or, that the Vatican is willing to hear thus reason the case. Oliver Wendell Holmes said it: you cant reason with the unreasonable; another person can be unable to reason or unwilling to reason why matters

not as its not possible to reason with an unreasonable person; I say, Or with people who have the concepts confused or not in their heads at all.

55.

We have traced this injury to its RECENT cause, as the denial of liberty responsible begins when you make your very first moral and ethical decision around age 4. This injury, the injury you are experiencing now, was realized in the 70s although its roots lay in the past. It came to fruition in the 70s. The 70s is the decade I was in grammar school. We had military action in Vietnam which was never lawfully declared a war, the NY Times announced that God is dead, Watergate transpired, propaganda known as disco was made popular (disco is an illusion only) and the AMA was denying that cocaine was an addictive drug to avoid paying for treatment and because it was the wealthy mans drug of choice. Ron Gerhardt can give testimony to this as he is a drug addiction specialist who experienced this denial in the 70s when he was beginning to treat patients. He told me he himself wondered if it was or was not addictive at first until a tragedy occurred. He suspected it was but he did not own the knowledge absolutely until that tragedy occurred. Gerhardt is already on the NY Court record. Recall Whitney Houstons I do not do crack as Im not a ho remark? Crack is a form of cocaine; its cheaper than powder cocaine as its less pure. Believe it or not there is a class system among drug users only they do not discriminate against the most lethal, most insidious, most dangerous drug of all: EGO. Or so we allege.

56.

In or around 1979 my fifth grade teacher, Gary Basil, noticed a change in children most especially how they had become immune to what the music they listened to or what the movies they saw actually said as if they were numb to the actual message and so only knew the illusion or never saw past the illusion. He also noted that the children in my class no longer had the human ability to defy peer pressure. I was the exception or so other children told me. Thus I paid attention: These kids were listening to the absolute

words in songs but w/o understanding while I heard music as a whole work. They were absoluting songs to death but the actual meaning of the lyric was lost to them; the title of a song meant nothing to them. If a song felt good? Then it was good! NOTHING was inappropriate. As for movies? While I laughed at and made fun of so-called slasher films my classmates took them seriously or took them on as a part of their person just like music. The illusion never, ever caused me to subconsciously or unwillingly suspend my disbelief. My point of view or my perspective when it comes to Hollywood is: I do not believe you; make me believe you - if you can. They suspended their belief not their disbelief! Like this:

57.

They never knew actual reality so having nothing to believe in they then believed anything! They did exactly what Patrick Henry warned us against when we abandoned the church as a central authority. What is supposed to be the central authority in the US? The governing documents thus you yourself are the authority over your life and you reason and apply them to yourself or you live them out as reality. These children did not practice US law nor did their families; most of these children never traveled beyond their own backyards and/or were taught to idolize what is European. Their emotional compass was all over then map! My emotional compass was not skewed while theirs was and is. And: their point of reference was ONLY what was currently popular while I know American culture in general as I know songs and movies from the dawn of the very inventions themselves. While these kids could not name American songs or movies pre-1975ish I had difficulty naming what is popular as popularity does not mean it is then good as in solid or as in art. These children adopted what is transient and popular as their sense of self!

58.

Ted Bundy would tell the FBI that slasher films and cheap detective novels were his favorite types of pornography. Justice Potter Stewart is correct: you know actual pornography when you see it as you FEEL it. An element of

actual pornography is will and liberty. Thats voyeurism and a complete skewing of moral authority so that moral authority becomes authoritarian rule aka absolute control. Bundy, a lawyer, did not exert liberty but absolute control; these types of predators and manipulators need living not dead victims. In case the FBI and federal court does not know: Ted Bundy became a lawyer to lay claim to the most living victims ever; he then escaped from prison to teach you that no prison could contain the idea he was the living embodiment of: pornography. Bundys actions were his proof his actual truth - but the only time he ever told the actual truth via his spoken word? When he was going to be executed so the FBI asked him for it as that then was his only way out as his physical death was then a certainty. The threat of physical death is the only actuality that then motivates people like Bundy to come clean and it might be the one and only time they have ever told the actual truth. Bundy began operating as a child from a time before he was born as his injury began in the womb as its partly socialization as you hear, feel emotion and feel pain when still in the womb. However: his course was never set in stone. Nobodys course is ever set in stone; opportunity or your own life is never beyond your control. Bundy named the exact two things my childhood friends loved that I never exposed myself to and/or that I never, ever came to vest my interest and so my belief in: Slasher films and soap operas, my generations idea of cheap detective novels. The TV soap opera is a form of the cheap detective novel as is the high school sex comedy. 5th grade would be when the girls in my class TRULY BELIEVED the idea of romance and love General Hospital portrayed including: Rape was perfectly okay, so okay that you might get in bed with and marry your rapist. Americans refer to this as the Luke and Laura Storyline. The class refuses to get in bed with and marry any of the unjust persons we name as rape is rape; its a form of self-annihilation. Some of these people are actual sociopaths. I write about sociopaths but first:

59.

In or around 1980 my 6th grade religion teacher noticed that the kinds and types of questions children asked had changed; they seemed to be crazy as in ultra-violent and even mentally ill and these children did not seem to

know what is or is not a sin or what actual guilt is or is not. Collette Heavey spoke to me about this and asked me about the confusion between brotherly love, romance, the act of sex and human sexuality the human quality that others seemed to have confused while I did not. She also pointed out the skyrocketing divorce rate and the slackening standards in TV and magazine advertising. This court should note: The 70s are commonly known as the ME Decade while the 80s are known as the GREED Decade. I lived to experience the transformation and I made careful observations. This is VERY important as at what age was I as this transformation took place? Puberty, the very stage a human being becomes a sexual being. Sexuality is not the same thing as sexualized. Children DO mimic what adults model as children are taught as inviolate law that adults are an unquestionable authority. That then causes them to form a gang mentality thus succumb to popular opinion aka peer pressure. Children reason their actions based upon what others do not upon any actual standard. I was never taught this; in my world adults could and did fall by my sword: the truth, as theres my truth, your truth and then a common truth. If you say common truth to me? Thats the same thing as universal law not what the Republicans, Japan, Norway or my mothers sister wants to and does believe. Exactly named members of the class might have been taught this mentality and might have succumbed to it at one point but they overcame it. Also:

60.

In Heaveys class I reasoned one of the most difficult points of law any Catholic can reason and so took out the Vatican or so it falsely seemed in about three seconds using its own doctrine. Heavey spoke to me alone informing me as to what I had done and telling me that the Vatican would pay my way for life if all I wanted to do is go to school as I just reasoned something people spend their whole lives trying to figure out. She meant: I owned it while most never own this knowledge, she being one of them. Knowing and owning knowledge are two different things. What did I reason? The nature Its of God aka the trinity versus the nature of of transubstantiation. the single biggest authority case original

jurisdiction any Catholic can make and I made it in 6 th grade as I succeeded

where Thomas Aquinas failed as he wasnt a woman. Its no accident that I correctly reasoned original sin that same year. None of this knowledge is secret or hidden; its all known and its on the human record one way or another. I notice the nuances others do not; I notice the nuances lost on most lawyers. Everything is one and the same but I can name the absolutes down to the unique identifiers.

61.

7th grade would be science teacher Carol Moran pointing out to me that while she knew the mathematical principle behind something like a Mobius strip or rather knew what the math is and so what a Mobius strip symbolized that she did not own the knowledge so could not apply it to her world. She did not own or incorporate the concept into her whole body of knowledge. I, Susan, can; I own it: Theres a Mobius strip to be found in US law or that math is found in US law. The concept is present but instead of numbers the symbols used to describe it are letters and words. People also do something that is the same as a Mobius strip. Its: nature. And asked to solve a problem I was the only person in the class who went home and solved it while every other child looked in our book for the answer; when Moran asked us if a stated answer was the correct answer? Only my hand shot up as since I did it on my own I owned it while every one else merely copied it verbatim. Me? I had no idea the answer was in our book as it never occurs to me to look outside of myself first, before I make any attempt at all. If I come to a stumbling block then I will look at sources outside of my own person. These kids were not making the smallest attempt on their own.

62.

8th grade? I discovered that children did not own the difference between absolutes and wholes and that in simple algebraic equations they were being taught to deny reality as this denial works but only in very, very simple equations. You are told to ignore thus deny unique identifiers; youre told that you do not have to account for the mathematical symbols as numbers are whole. Children are taught to ignore or deny positive and negative signs to then answer simple algebraic equations as if this method always and

forever works. This only works in simple algebra and it leads to adults changing their numbers to fit their theories; they account for why they can change a number or a word or a case caption but then do not do the math; they do not account for the effect that change has on every single part of the whole equation. They do not reason their actions fully but only until it feels good or until you accept whatever they are dictating to you. The other students had no idea how algebra is related to geometry and trig or what calculus is plus I now know: college students are carrying over this same denial of reality. This denial of reality gave rise to: String theory. I took a course in science as an adult in college and not one student knew the existent relationship between Fahrenheit and Celsius plus nobody has ever been able to answer where or when we first encounter usage of iambic pentameterthats about rhythm. I discovered that English is elegant. Iambic pentameter? While not natural in other languages it is natural in English. US LAW HAS RHYTHM BUT NOT NECESSARILY IAMBS. These truths are self-evident to me. Nature is self-evident. Universal law comes naturally to me.

63.

When Heavey and I discussed what I had reasoned regarding Catholic Doctrine she pointed out that my emotional compass was not skewed so that I could reason exacting authority cases in such a way my faith is not shattered. Transubstantiation is actually men attempting to give birth; thats not what we argued but its an example of a catholic or universal authority case (catholic means universal) as men do not give birth to babies and its meant to strip people of moral authority. Or it was in the Dark and Middle Ages. This is not the Dark Ages; whats US law and Marbury? Never blindly obey! Collette Heavey warned me to NOT enter the Vatican Court or US Federal Court until I had every answer as she asked, Do you have a right to shatter the faith of others? I said, No. She warned me or told me to solve the problems first and for me that means I must name every absolute or every reason and every cause and then place it within the whole. I must be

able to reason it from beginning to end and in a circuit. Most humans settle for: reason enough. Or so we have proven.

64.

Reason enough is like proof enough: you stop acting or you start acting when it feels good not when its correct. When you reason universal law correctly? As some norms are absolutes you will end where you began; youll have every absolute within the whole. Heavey meant and conveyed to me: Until or unless I can protect the class like Thurgood Marshall then I could never use word tricks or emotional sleight of hand as it would be a sin treason - as I knew but harmed others anyway. For me reason enough and proof enough would never constitute self-defense. I know that under US law reason enough and proof enough do not exist in actuality. At least two members of the class owned the absolutes re BVG but could not make the last link to then tie it together as a whole legal argument so they too purposely waited to enter federal court.

65.

What these teachers kept pointing out to me was or is the realization and then the further escalation of the injury due to the post-civil war 1871 version of US law being forced upon us and due to the failure of the The People to integrate or for women and persons who have other than white skin and European features to actualize power and authority post-Brown V Topeka and due to our failure to address the violations of law and/or to negotiate our safety when an American never negotiates their safety; they were naming the false and deceptive illusion, or, propaganda. They were pointing out how crime and criminal acts are now in plain sight or that the delusion is in secret as if nobody knows when we all know. Unjust men rationalize if you do not confront them or do not create the piece of paper that states guilty then nobody knows thus they are invincible gods. If you say nothing or do nothing they truly believe they kept a secret from you, as if their actions and he contents of their hearts are a secret when they arent. They deny physical, emotional and metaphysical reality.

66.

What kind of movie became very, very popular when I was about 14? The high school sex comedy which is very close to Bundys cheap detective novel as the high school sex comedy is a form of voyeurism if you are 14 not 44. The teenage sex comedy is explicit in a way the TV soap opera is not. Thus between soap operas, sex comedies and actual slasher films you have the forms of pornography Bundy named. The ideas of sex, love and violence become confused and blurred when children blindly vest belief in these films or come to enjoy and seek out the ego-driven emotions they feel upon watching them. The generation that is responsible for the election of Clinton and Obama is my generation, the people born at the last year cited as being a baby boom year 1967 and who are called generation X. Generation X was exposed to something new and something explicit: forms of popular culture that are brand new inventions or that were not acceptable socially previously.

67.

My peers and those who came after us experienced an emotion they should never have experienced exactly like the followers of Hitler did. They couldnt distinguish what is actual reality or not; they would be afraid as they felt afraid watching Nightmare on Elm Street and never saw how the blood in no way resembles actual blood while I laughed at the bad special effects and unbelievable plot lines. Grease? It was one of the most popular films ever and parents lauded it but: The girl is only accepted when she changes everything about herself and dresses like a whore to please the group and to please boys but that was lost on Americans; Forest Gump? The main female character uses the main male character over and over and over, mistreating him horribly; she even hides his son from him for about 5 years; thats not love and thats anything but a healthy relationship but nobody thinks about it until I name it as: their will is the will of the group not their own. In America your will is never, ever to become the will of the group. [Im beginning to wonder what would have become of the Founders if they had TV.]

68.

These teachers were naming the rise of endemic drug addiction, the effect of new technology and a form of ignorance that I never fell victim to; these teachers were naming the escalation of ego at the expense of id or our nations self-identity. I did not know until I was an adult, until BVG transpired, that others did not believe A Summary View or that they did not know it has been proven and is the legal claim our existence or our foundation as a nation rests upon. If your foundation is on shaky ground then you are!

69.

I am not kidding this court: now today - I have citizens DENYING that Jefferson ever lived or that he ever addressed a currency bill in Congress when anybody can look up the record and we wouldnt exist if he did not live. One citizen said, I refuse to read A Summary View to justify his denial of actual reality. Members of the class who attended public school and/or attended any school pre-1970 had a very different experience than I did. Counsel Susan Clemons experienced authoritarian rulers so knowledge was dictated to her, she was not allowed to question anything, she was made to rotely memorize knowledge, Darwin was law and she took multiple choice tests only. She was NEVER asked to form her own opinion. Most Americans alive now experienced the same. Once I heard an American deny actual historical reality known as the Revolution as this is what Germans did that then allowed the Nazis to rise to power? The injury ripened. So then:

70.

The ego driven are Sophists not philosophers. They are not liberated thinkers. Sophists teach for money; they claim you cannot know the truth as then you could question their expert knowledge. Sophists make a living out of questioning you as they truly believe they are above question. Hence as an expert authority that can never be proven to be incorrect they can justify earning a profit. They engage in a form of blanket denial that is labeled skepticism but in actuality they MUST deny reality or else: nobody would pay them; nobody would need them. If the given is its not possible to

know the truth then you can argue anything at all is the truth as you cannot know THE truth, get it? Anything they dictate to you is the truth. The original Sophists argued that something was right or wrong based upon conditions and that you were a victim of socially induced conditions. Sophists are most like todays organized academia and organized legal profession. To a Sophist nothing is law.

71.

To illustrate the difference I will cite SCOTUS as you can ask a Justice a question directly you can challenge something a Justice says on paper or in person as its known as setting precedent, dialogue and debate but in NY the family court was sending citizens to a psychiatrist if they directly questioned a judges actions. I kid you not: The family court judge in my case was actually cited by the Judicial Board of Review for doing this exact thing as a man told her she was WRONG and so questioned her to her face so she ORDERED him to see a psychiatrist. The Board of Review found for him not her so who is mentally ill? Sophism is a form of denial of consent thus a denial of liberty as can anyone know and so act if they cant ask federal questions? Sophists reason as nothing is law then nothing is ever anyones fault and so all injury and harm is perfectly acceptable.

72.

Socrates came along and sounded the death knell for the Sophists as he successfully argued that some norms are absolute and universally true. I, Susan, did not make up some norms are absolute out of thin air; Socrates proved it centuries ago; then I re-proved it by proving it to myself as who says or what law dictates that Socrates cant be incorrect? Socrates himself would disagree if you claimed he is infallible. Socrates spent his entire life being fundamentally responsible for the federal case and asking the federal questions thus opening your floor for debate. Anybody can question Socrates. As some norms are absolute? US law is both absolute and whole. The death of Socrates signaled the beginning of the fall of classical Greece; his death symbolized the death of truth exactly like the death of John

Marshall and later the assassination of Lincoln symbolized the death of classical America. The difference is: John Marshall died of natural causes. I, Susan, other counsel and the exactly named class am sounding the Liberty Bell this time:

73.

We have been invaded by sophist faux Americans. Or so we allege.

74.

Proclaim liberty throughout the land unto all the inhabitants thereof or so the Liberty Bell says. Thats a fulcrum; today we have moved too far left of center thus we were invaded. Whenever a nation of People moves to the left, the farther left they move the more restrictive the press becomes; the more delusional the people become. Thats world history as its nature. John Roberts was correct when he said the political climate is disturbing as Voters do not know politics is intrinsic or what is political in the negative way versus the lawful way. This is especially so with websites; as they name their price (member of the class Carl S. calls it the donate now button) they are afraid of losing profit so censor you in such a way it would never hold water in court as youve followed their rules. This kind of censorship, fear mongering, happened in Germany as the Nazis rose to power; this kind of censorship made the Nazi regime possible. It made Obama possible here and now.

75.

America is suffering from enforced helplessness and enforced powerlessness aka battered womens syndrome. Named in medical literature its what happens to you when you vote for wife beaters and/or child abusers as they then abuse you; its what transpires when you install the corrupt and criminally corrupt in the Offices: you create a climate and culture of fear, self-doubt and blame, that you then succumb to thus you are your own ultimate victim and ultimate victimizer. Youre the wife beater or the battered woman, the victim or the victimizer, as this syndrome is human and we also call another form of it the Stockholm Syndrome. The Stockholm

Syndrome is when the victims begin to identify with their victimizers which has begun to happen in America. You become deluded and defrauded as you participate in delusion and perpetrate fraud. The voters feel forced and are identifying with their captors thus electing them. If James Madison is the Father of The Constitution? Its only because he did not abuse power and exploit knowledge in an attempt to personally profit at our expense. As a profession lawyers became delusional; to some extent and degree politicians always were delusional as politics began when Adam took a bite of the apple upon his own will and liberty but blamed Eve in an attempt to escape the consequences of his actions. Or so we allege.

76.

As we cited A Summary View Is this a land patent case? What do you, the reader, call sovereignty or allodial title? The land patent is evidence of the right to title existing; we can and will prove we own allodial title and are sovereign so we are not taking out a land patent upon a nation we already own title to as we are the nation. The right exists; we do not need evidence of the existent right as we are the absolute proof: Absolute Title: As applied to title to land, an exclusive title, or at least a title which excludes all others not compatible with it. An absolute title to land cannot exist at the same time in different persons or in different governments. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Edition. Fictitious entities, like trusts, corporations, etc., cannot obtain land patents except by express act of the United States Congress. A Land Patent is permanent and cannot be changed by the government after its issuance except in case of fraud, clerical error, or failure to pay the initial administrative fees. A statute of limitations applies. The now broken DC Trust has committed fraud or so we allege and it cannot hold title as we already do absolutely plus the DC Trust constitutes a fictitious corporation as we never had the debate and it was forced upon us against our will and before we were born in 1871. Did women have a voice in 1871? NO. The entity we know of as the DC Trust is itself a form of propaganda as effectively the government known as The People was overthrown when Lincoln was shot and killed and the DC Trust now denies US history as well as

the original purpose of the zip code: if you use it then you are placing yourself and your property in the Trusts domain.

77.

The class claims via direct entry to SCOTUS and actual default we made or turned the DC Trust into an actual foreign city state like the Vatican City. We also stand upon a document out of GA that claims or rather resolves that 5 Justices are guilty of treason as it was delivered to the Speaker of the House when law schools, lawyers and the Officers claim Marbury V Madison is unconstitutional and when any person may stand upon Article III to then make the case; you cannot and may not claim SCOTUS is unconstitutional but yet then abide by its opinions or claim you are powerless against it as that itself is delusional. Direct entry to SCOTUS allows me and the class to claim or cite Article III along with the whole of the 3 governing documents SCOTUS accepts upon matters of law as this would be American common law NOT a class system or hierarchal system of Officers pitted against The People. We stand upon Article III not the Judiciary or DC as all authority belongs to The People a fact no court has ever disputed. The SCOTUS clerks never disputed this which is how we gained direct entry twice. If the Judiciary chooses to stand upon Article III with us? It is then constitutionally setting itself. We then are not within the Trusts domain; we are allegiant to the original Founders ideals and our original nation and our original government of People not to money, titles or material goods. So then:

78.

Most Americans do not know: We have no national flag. That is we never took a vote upon a flag but only agree to use the flag we use; whether or not it has gold trim matters not. Legally then DC is allegiant to a flag we are not; hanging behind the VPs and Speakers heads at the SOTUA (state of the union address) that flag now symbolizes what DC thinks, feels and believes: small allegiances as flags signal or communicate an idea to people and so indicate courts of admiralty, or, a foreign court in this case as the civil conviction is most recently French. The 2010 SOTUA constituted a civil

conviction. We fly flags in court to signal jurisdiction and what kind or type of court in session is and the flag is used on the high seas to indicate nation of origin plus allegiance and/or registry. Its common to sail from one port or be a citizen of America but register your ship under another nations flag due to the seeming benefits. Thus: does the flag flying in DC represent us or DC? Legally or technically if you are an actual American you are not allegiant to the thing the flag is or to DC itself or to any institution you never die in defense of an institution - but to the thoughts, feelings, ideas and beliefs as espoused by our Founders so that you fight and die in defense of constitutions. This is why you can burn a flag to protest politically; its not one single reason but reasoning. The flag we never voted upon but only agree to use was flying behind the supposed, not constitutionally set President, VP and Speaker at the 2010 SOUTA. That flag fell upon actual default and so I ran a brand new one up the pole:

79.

Floridas LET US ALONE as its an actual flag Floridians voted upon that the governor refused to fly against our will. It is listed in all historical lists of flags Florida has adopted legally and Florida? Florida may be the lone state that has had more than six flags fly over it as it has changed hands so many times: counting the Seminole flag as the Seminoles are the only undefeated American Indian tribe and the most expensive war in US history is said to be the war we fought against them in vain as the Seminole yet remain in Florida today and we never forced into surrender against their will then Florida has had at least seven flags flying over it. Arguing this case via a natural born citizen of Florida who knew as a whistleblower to swear out an invocation of rights and file it with the FBI in 2006 as an American and a Floridian as Florida is an actual Republic that has had a continuous secessionist movement in play and has always actively opposed unjust annexation then the class claims: LET US ALONE! as DC became a foreign nation unto itself and with it all sitting Officers became citizens of that foreign nation. BVG arose from: Florida! Legally it came from DC but physically it came from Florida; emotionally it came from Thomas Jefferson and metaphysically it

came from me an actual Floridian but first an actual American! Ray Morton is a flag expert who is writing a book about flags; he can tell the court anything it wants or needs to know about the flag and flags in general.

80.

In this case we claim the flag now represents the Officers and the broken trust circa 1871 not The People as if a foreign nation. This foreign nation would have Obama, an actual foreigner, as their chosen leader. See the never filed SCOTUS Stay, never filed as Stay Clerk Danny Bickle keeps denying that we ever entered Sioux City Iowa or that any opinion was ever issued by the Sioux City Federal District Court when it was. It reads: Strike the paper to strike The People only uses other words to say this. We asked Sioux City to issue this exact ruling so we then could stay it as it constitutes a ransom note for Earth and also supports that DC is not the government and that paper is being personified while The People are being objectified. Simultaneously we meant to protect the Sioux City Federal Court from a threat Obama and the Obama administration made as it told the newspapers that it could and would restructure Article III beginning with the Sioux City Appellate as important opinions were arising out of that court. YES: THE PEOPLE OR THIS SUIT ITSELF AS I CITED SIOUX CITY IN THE DIRECTLY ENTERED SCOTUS CASE FOR MY OWN UNIQUE REASONING. The Obama Administration only threatened Sioux City as I named it exactly thus I knew to go there again. All court rulings are equally important. What, the DC District Court is not important? Only some people and only some judges are important? One fact alone sets Sioux City apart: My citation. Stay Clerk Danny Bickle can deny reality all he wants as that does not affect us:

81.

The People are not in denial and are not delusional most of the Officers are so currently, as Obama Jr. is not natural born and may not even be a legal voter and as Resolution 511 can never make John McCain qualify legally so then the flag no longer represents The People as it once did. Thus the DC Trust is foreign or alien to The People and is a nation unto itself as nothing

provides for incorporating thus owning The People as thats a form of slavery and nothing makes any violation of the law then sound and ethical. Flying the flag w/o understanding and w/o knowing blind, false allegiance and unconditional pride - would also place you in the Trusts domain like blind use of the zip code does. If you know then you may or may not be in the Trusts domain as it is up to you based upon informed consent and the contract to fly the flag or not: do you have a contract or not? Default means we do not. WE KNOW; WE OWN THE KNOWLEDGE WE ARE PEOPLE AND ARE CONSTITUTIONALLY SET. IF WE FLY A FLAG OR USE THE ZIP CODE WE KNOW AND HAVE REASONING. WE MIGHT NOT HAVE A CONTRACT WITH THE OFFICERS ANYMORE BUT WE DO HAVE ONE WITH EACH OTHER. The class does not blindly fly flags nor subscribe to unconditional pride i.e. unconditional patriotism as thats not actual patriotism. Or so we allege.

82.

I, Susan, never placed myself in the DC Trusts domain and I never, ever flew a flag or wore any flag or even any patriotic symbol until after I entered SCOTUS directly and until after I secured default legally. I never used the zip code or if I did I was experimenting but the post office keeps doing it for me the zip code is filled in for me - so finally I developed an argument for the post office as its self-funded so it does not close in a federal budget crisis: We fund it when we buy postage thus affixing the seal. When you buy a stamp you have a direct, two party, person to person contract as there is no middle man if you then mail the commission yourself. Its why SCOTUS says delivery may be by first class mail: The post office belongs to The People not to the Trust and mailmen are uniformed federal officers who we commission directly; abuse of franking privileges is one of the gravest sins or crimes you can commit as an Officer. Ideally the class would not have to come to Federal District Court if the post master general knew he could deliver a commission to the Chief Justice in person bypassing security as he is a federal uniformed officer protected by the Tenure in Office Act, Andrew Johnson, the nature of the post office itself, Myers V US , unique fact of this

exacting situation and as 1st class delivery is named in the SCOTUS rules. Or so we allege.

83.

The postal service argument became very important recently when the Jacksonville City Council tampered with the ballot claiming it had the authority to make an Executive Decision regarding postage thus it placed nonreflective tape over the bar code causing voters to have to pay a poll tax, an actual poll tax, in the form of extra postage. Non-reflective tape does not appear or read on a scanner; member of the class Brian Dobry is an expert as he is a printer by trade and once appeared on the list to of possible employees of the US Treasury. He has done work for the National Museum. Prior to this event class member Richard Pait made a good case against the city council as did the residents of Jacksonville: The Jacksonville City Council met in public at a restaurant supposedly not holding a meeting outside of the public, or, in private when it was and did. As the investigator/s could not prove what they talked about then this Council was merely reprimanded. It was yet another offense in a long string of offenses. The Jacksonville City Council not only does not have this authority but it has zero authority over independent Neptune Beach although this did not stop it from tampering with Neptune Beachs ballot to QUALIFY to vote. Jacksonville consolidated city and county services but Neptune Beach is independent however we ended up with the same supervisor of elections who made this decision and who in turn blamed the Jax City Council.

84.

Neptune Beach is the only independent jurisdiction within the county. Duval County thus incorporated Jacksonville not Jacksonville proper has the largest land area in the 48 contiguous states and in the US is second only to Anchorage, Alaska in size. We, residents of Neptune Beach not Jacksonville, then had to pay extra postage never proscribed by US law, court order or US history as poll taxes have always been stricken. The Jacksonville City Council publicly claimed responsibility when Brian Dobry prompted an

investigation. In other words the Jacksonville City Council said it ordered Harry Shorstein, Supervisor of Elections, to tamper with the ballot and he did; I believe the Council exactly claimed it okayed the tampering. People ended up having to pay what is equivalent to a poll tax if they wanted to qualify to vote, absolutely proving that Obama Jr. and the DC Trust is foreign. Neptune Beach has its own city council and its own city services as we were born in a tax revolt and what is a tax revolt? An EP&DP issue aka your vote, our very founding issue as a nation. Or so we allege.

85.

Then our argument on behalf of the postal service became important for different reasoning: A copy of this suit was mailed to DC Federal District Court on May 16th, 2011. On May 18th, 2011 it was out for delivery. No member of counsel ever received notice via mail as is the rule and/or custom in every other federal court. Upon receipt you are notified of receipt. A consistent pattern in this case whenever a guilty party wishes to sink the case aka commit a crime is to claim the postal service failed to deliver the pieces of paper. Not once in my life has this ever actually occurred; it is nothing more than the placement of blame. However the post office never confirmed actual delivery occurred this lone time. I phoned the DC court on June 1st, 2011 and got the shock of my life:

86.

The DC Federal District Court told me that no such case had ever been received and that the DC FEDERAL District Court is unique in all of the nation! While the Officers publish literature that reads the DC Court operates like every other federal court? Not so; the DC Court told me that they do not acknowledge receipt; that they screen your case for technicalities and then send it ahead if its technically perfect and that you do not appear on the docket for 4 to 6 weeks. In other words: your case is sent to a black hole, a vortex whereby anybody can do anything to it, your case is being prejudicially handled and the public cant know. Having filed in every single district this is unique treatment. In every other federal court filing occurs upon the day it is received or within a 24 hour period. If a court asked for a

form? The case was returned or held for ten days upon receipt of the form and then filed. Once it was legal to ask us for a form; now it is not. The DC employee told me that she checked andno case could be found. She erroneously told me that you cant represent another person in violation of US law and case law and that was after she asked me WHY Thomas Jefferson was not counsel and I had to tell her: Because: Hes dead. Prior to this exchange I told her THE Thomas Jefferson not any old Jefferson; not once has anybody asked me why Jeffersons corpse was not appearing in person and even SCOTUS filed a Petition captioned In Re Thomas Jefferson. This is yet more proof of delusion and foreignization.

87.

If you look on the DC or government sponsored website it reads all inquiries regarding filings must be made in writing; upon informing the employee I was speaking to that I would write? She said dont bother as it must be the post offices fault. I made an attempt to reason with her as this case entered SCOTUS directly the first time upon evidence rising to proof of criminal activity being present in the clerks office in SCOTUS but there was no reasoning with her. I then phoned the post office; the post office is actively attempting to confirm delivery as they deliver packages in bulk or at once to the federal courthouse and the suit was sent out for delivery; it was placed on a truck. Upon hearing what the DC court told me? W/o any prompting the post officer said: If thats true and thats how the DC Federal Court operates then how can anybody know anything? They can do anything they want with a filing. Or the US mail; twice in my life clerks in Dc said they could, would, did and had interfered with the delivery of US mail to deliberately obstruct justice. They also abused franking privileges to deny The People all of their rights. When the post was told that a pattern in this exact case is to place blame on the post office? The post office confirmed what I already knew via life experience: No matter what the corrupted claim the failure rate of the post office to deliver a letter is almost non-existent. It might take a while but even if your letter ends up at the dead letter office

you can retrieve it by merely filing out a form and visually describing it. The post office is investigating as I write.

88.

After sending me a letter that claimed that the DC Federal Court never received the complaint and that no court clerks ever handled it nobody was admitting to having touched it and instructing me to take it up with the US Postal Service, the complaint was returned to me on June 3rd, 2011; it HAD gone to the DC court and had been handled. I specifically asked the employee I spoke to if it would ever take this long to check it for technicalities and she said, No. What in the world happens to complaints between the short period of time it takes to check for technicalities and the 4 to 6 weeks the clerks claimed it takes to appear on the docket as having been filed? Further: you may not hold us to the rules you hold a licensed lawyer to as long as we act to the best of our ability. It is stamped by the DC Federal Court; they did have and they did mishandle it and they did blame the post office a problem once you do this in DC Federal Court as it is a direct attack on the People via a direct attack on the Post Master General and the entire Postal Service. See the attached official communication. So then:

89.

Nobody pulled this stuff out of a hat out of thin air - as there is reason and ration for every word in US law and in SCOTUS opinions and now that actual foreignization has occurred we are being charged what is equivalent to a poll tax and we are slaves once more. I, Susan, happen to have a bill of sale for my person and my childrens persons in the form of a deed for a house that I entered to court. Most people alive today believe the Founders made up the original as they went along they believe its a fairy story - or only know the 1871 version of US law and so they believe that there is no reason or ration behind the numbers and words as they cannot reconcile it with the claims we make and with the math or BVG; they are not aware of A Summary View or do not understand how Marbury could be said to be unconstitutional and yet

lawyers and others go along with it when they claim its not lawful. The irreconcilable differences make the Voters (including the paid Officers) feel crazy so they act crazy.

90.

Absolute proof is:

On Charlie Roses show Barney Frank, a supposed

Senator, complained about the original numbers in US law and said they should be changed; he was w/o reason or ration. Rose seemed to agree and wondered about changing them; a discussion if you can call it that ensued; when Rose asked why not as in why those numbers Frank said, Blame James Madison! For what, good math? Authoritarians place blame and do not or will not reason.

91.

Fault Madison? Blame James Madison??? EXACTLY as the numbers were stacked as they are with meaning and purpose; they make sense and keep power in the hands of The People. At a Town Hall Meeting a woman called Barney Frank a Nazi; he denied this. Frank is a Nazi or so we allege as hes an authoritarian ruler: reason and ration do not matter to him. The class has no idea what Charlie Rose is thinking. Frank told us his thinking: He wasnt; he merely WANTED something to change that would seemingly benefit he himself, the way we elect Senators, w/o ever reasoning it fully. Theres reason we fund the post office directly; theres reason 2/3 of the Senate is elected at once; theres reason for the natural birth clauses: Youre leveraging, stacking, balancing and counterbalancing your power and authority via your vote. I told the post office my legal argument on its behalf and the postal service offered to sign anything I needed them to sign. To date The Peoples authority has been recognized by every federal agent we have confronted directly. Sun Tzu is correct:

92.

The winning army recognizes the conditions necessary for victory then pursues victory while the losing army seeks victory first. One condition we are fighting? Propaganda, actual propaganda. So then:

93.

We have named propaganda over and over. Propaganda is a lie as its meant to deceive you in such a way your reality is changed. Its why and how the illusion can be so convincing. A person can be living propaganda as Hitler was as a person embodies propaganda exactly like one embodies law. Propaganda targets both the conscious and subconscious mind. It is especially effective on the subconscious mind. You lend your belief to the lies you are told by the current two party monopoly as you want to believe them not as they are true or even truthful. You want to lie to: yourself. You want to: avoid the painful emotional truth. Propaganda is not protected by your First Amendment right of free speech and can rise to be a crime known as treason as by its nature propaganda is designed to deny you your rights and to break your will. Barack Obama himself is propaganda; he cannot execute a single solitary duty named in US law, he cannot accord anyone any of their rights and he absolutely refuses to obey US law or to protect women and children if that means he has to do something not for profit but that is selfless. I claim: Obama would sooner kill you than ever reveal the truth of his person or the persons around him. I would know:

94.

I, Susan, am the whistleblower that Barack Obama threatened to kill via violating Gideon by sending secret police to my home to cart me away in the night without ever pressing any charges. Guess who delivered this threat, a threat that came directly from Obama or upon Obamas direct order? Not the CIA. I was told: YOU CAN NEVER ENTER THE TRUTH TO THE FEDERAL COURT AGAIN as my case against him and his administration of criminal cronies is airtight as is the class case. Thats the nature of truth; it is terrifying to the criminally corrupted as there is no defense you can mount against the truth. You cannot revise or amend the creation of this nation, this planet or this universe. I cant tell the truth in federal court ever again? Yes I can and will we can and we will - but DC Federal Court works fine for us as Obama and persons who are the Obama Administration forgot: DC isnt a state, its in default and: What about the other commissions Adams

issued when he issued Marburys? Petitioning the DC Federal Court opened a door not closed one as otherwise we never would have discovered their named bizarre process that makes no reasonable or rational sense and that is not practiced by any other federal court that I know of as they, DC, are a FEDERAL courthouse but do not seem to want to admit this to themselves. Scapegoating is exactly what the Nazis did. So then:

95.

Barack Obama entered NORTH America via Canada; the reason Obama claimed to possess dual citizenship so he was British is he entered North America via Vancouver, British Columbia and then entered the US. There is a major airport in Vancouver; he and his mother entered North America via Vancouver and then entered the US at or in Vancouver or somewhere near Vancouver. Canada holds the vault copy of his records. A vault copy is the original documentation of your person; it does not have to be your actual paper birth certificate as whatever nation holds the vault copy then holds or owns you. I can and will produce living Canadian witnesses. See attached written by a Canadian. It is reported by American eyewitnesses that Stanley Dunham, Barack Obama Jr.s American born mother, showed up in WA just after Obama was born and then she left for Hawaii only to return to WA again. As an infant Obama entered Canada, then the US. Canada, like Kenya once was, is a protectorate of the crown. It matters not where Obama Jr. was physically born as he entered North America and the US via Canada thus was claimed as property of the crown via Canada. Or so we allege.

96.

The class can, will and did already prove that Stanley Anne Dunham and Barack Obama Sr., Obama Jr.s parents, did not fly to another Hawaiian island to elope as reported when they were on a Hawaiian island already but instead they flew to Kenya where Dunham gave birth. They were never married as Barack Obama Sr. was married already and they never lived together as husband and wife. They flew to Kenya as reported by Barack Obama Jr.s own grandmother where Obama Jr. was born (her testimony was seen live depending upon where you live on Earth so we entered the satellite

coordinates an eyewitness gave us; satellites use repeaters Im an expert as my father was a HAM radio operator and chief of Emergency Services in Renneselaer County, NY - so when repeated this testimony was edited out but not if you watched it in real time as not everyone saw this broadcast via repeater). Then, as Obama Jr. was a citizen of the British Empire due to his Kenyan birth and his father being Kenyan thus British, his mother flew to Canada to then re-enter the US via Washington State as Dunham once lived there. From Washington State she returned to Hawaii. Or so we claim as we confirmed this over and over and as the person who threatened me, Susan, admitted it was the truth. He said, You may never enter THE TRUTH again to any federal court. This was in reference to the Sioux City complaint which contains at least two unique pieces of evidence and testimony. So then:

97.

Dunham would not have been able to enter the US with her infant child w/o paperwork and with only a Kenyan birth certificate so she flew to Canada who now holds the vault copy because of her actions. The vault copy has the word transcript on it if you request a copy of the vault copy as its exacting. Obama Jr. then is the property of the crown, of Canada and Great Britain, not the US. Dunham may or may not have secured a certificate of live birth from HA based upon fraud or her perjured testimony and actions. No matter what Dunham told Hawaiian officials she did not tell them the truth as she did not name her actual motive and intent; if Hawaii did issue a certificate of live birth? It is not good; Obama Jr. was never a voter let alone qualified to hold the Office of Executive. [Note: witnesses and supporting documentation indicates this is a pattern in Dunhams nuclear family as her parents were never married or so it seems and they played this the paper not your actions is the proof game.]

98.

I, Susan, have traveled the length of Canada twice in my lifetime, by car and on foot. The first time I did so I left the US in NY and entered Ontario; I have also entered Quebec. Then after traveling west I re-entered the US in or at Washington State and the other time re-entered in Idaho [fact check that

with my Mom].

Im an actual expert who was there and who has been

subjected to this process. Obama was born in Kenya; he entered North America via Canada then the US and then Dunham took him to HA where her parents were and where she met Obama Sr. and went to school before becoming pregnant and where she might have secured a certificate of live birth as so far, we have not seen a legal Hawaiian certificate of live birth as the one published that is purported to be Hawaiian reads African as his fathers race and/or nationality when no US birth cert would ever read that word at this time nor is the word transcript on this document. Africa is a continent not a nationality or race. Or so we allege.

99.

WE DO NOT USE SOCIO-POLITICAL CONSTRUCTS TO NOTE RACE OR NATIONALITY IN THE US. Caucasian and Negroid are scientific not sociopolitical. If you are claiming to be a natural born citizen of the US? Under father your certificate of live birth and your long form birth certificate must name a father who is a natural born American no matter what else it reads as your father accords you the birthright. SCOTUS has already upheld this as Ngyuen V Immigration states that your mother accords you the benefit; that the benefit of citizenship goes to the mother not the father thus to you. The right to vote is the benefit as thats about EP&DP thus tax apportionment; the right to vote and the birthright known as Office of President and Commander are two different things. Physical birth alone - your mother as fathers do not give birth to babies - accords you the right not the birthright. Or so we allege.

100. Obamas daughters have a federal case so that they could secure the birthright as its possible in their case based upon their unique facts. The class gave Obama an argument that he could make IF he had the ability or capacity; he could not so he did not but Obamas daughters still have a case that we can make on their behalf. Its possible dependent upon your unique facts or your unique life. They already have rights, rights their own parents are deliberately violating, but not the birthright. Rights are matter of

universal law; rights are part of the very fabric of this universe. Barack Obama was not even a part of the electorate he cannot so much as establish he has a claim to the right or birthright let alone enter a good claim based upon the truth as he bought the house he lived in with the proceeds from Dreams a book designed as propaganda that was meant to make you connect Obama to Africa and Augustine of Hippo thus to slavery and justice; it was meant and intended to Americanize, rationalize and justify and so quantify not qualify Obama as a lawful contender vying for the Executive thus deny you your right and birthright. Before Obama bought the house he came to own with proceeds from Dreams he lived in a condo so he owned no land thus was not a part of the electorate. Your name does not appear on the land title if you own a condo. I would tell the Court and the voters to listen to the testimony of the person Obama named as best friend in high school who supposedly changed Obamas life as this person said Obama never expressed any such idea in actual reality and that no such relationship existed and that Obama could not recognize him when he contacted Obama but you do not need to do so as Bill Ayers confessed to writing Dreams Of My Father and publicly challenged the class to sue him if it could. WE CAN SO WE WILL; WE ARE. We never needed Ayers confession as no person could write Dreams if they are not self aware and Obama is not. It is humanly impossible to write Dreams unless you are extremely self-aware or unless you are writing fiction; we always knew it was a fictional work. I, Susan, am an expert in the human psyche; therapists can and will confirm my expertise and that Obama is not self-aware. Or so we allege.

101.

I, Susan, cannot defeat the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Test but I can level it. I am the most extremely self-aware you can be. Obama would skew in an exact direction thus revealing his personality type. Me? All I would reveal is the extent and degree of the injury the test designer and giver has suffered or what their personality type is not my own. Like US law and IQ tests its a matter of deliberate design as humans possess motive and intent. I can and will define the actual science of it. I, Susan, volunteered to take this

test twice and the first time I took it I knew what the test creator had done and that he failed to account for women thinking in wholes and/or giving birth to babies; the best word to describe what is on that test is scatological. He also failed to account for his own disability. Years later I would meet a person associated or affiliated with one of the main designers of this test; you cannot defeat it with tricks but only level it with the truth so my initial impression was is correct. I will prove this to a court or to The People at any time; I will prove I do indeed know what I am talking about when I claim something is true about Obamas psyche and his motive and intent. I can produce the person who knew the test designer. She is already on the record; she was entered to state and federal court.

102.

I have been warned by many therapists NOT to engage in treating people outside of a therapeutic setting as I do not possess that experience but I do know personality types, disorders and self-awareness so well I could practice as a therapist if only I received clinical training or if I was willing to cause injury and harm. I am not. You cannot defeat the Minnesota test via lying and tricks or by deliberately skewing it healthy if you are actually unhealthy but you can level it or equal it via telling the truth. The test designers theory is flawed; his theory is all people lie for if they do not do it consciously they do it subconsciously when in reality that itself not the truth or its bad theory for if you come to know your own subconscious mind fully you have the human ability and capacity to tell the whole truth; youre 100% emotionally healthy. Its like scoring a perfect 200 on an IQ test or scoring so high on the endless IQ test that the test giver then ends the test, lol, as its pointless beyond a certain score. If you are not driven by your subconscious mind as you own the knowledge of it and have conquered your greatest fear then you can level this test merely by: Telling the whole truth about your own person. The wording of the questions, the repetition and the exhaustive length of the test the sheer number of questions will not fool you as your motive and intent is HONESTY. Thats the nature of this test as its meant to reveal the truth of the test designer, giver and taker. Its failsafe in that the interpreter

who is usually the test giver must account for all three including not excluding their own self as much as possible as they arent 100% emotionally healthy. Reading the report thats generated you can know as absolute fact what the test givers issues are. You can negate any conscious or subconscious skewing that is the fault of the test giver. Again: this only serves to prove my expertise. I have experience in this field and expert knowledge ownership of knowledge - in actual reality. While its tempting to claim that you are experiencing narcissistic personality disorder in the Whitehouse? In some cases you are but its not always that as it only seems as if and its not so simple once you encounter active addiction even if the addiction is lying:

103.

If you check the record if you check Barack Obamas own words or words he takes credit for - Obama is from Chicago most recently and he has said when he was in an elevator with his mother and that she told him that she almost went to school in Chicago. Thats an example of your subconscious mind driving you; why Chicago? From "Dreams": I was only sixteen then," she told us as we entered the elevator, "I'd just been accepted to the University of Chicago -- Gramps hadn't told me yet that he would let me go -and I was there for the summer, working as an au pair." A website known as the Obamafile, that was chosen by the Library of Congress to be included in its collection of captured internet material (see attached), noted the same thing we did as did others: A pattern as Obama keeps changing his fact to Chicago or someone else does it for him; it always has to be Chicago whether its true or not and when its not possible at times and I know every reason why as I too have been to Chicago and so has Kurt Vonnegut. Its no happy accident that we call it the windy city, that Chicago bills itself as the city of broad shoulders as if its Atlas and as a world alpha financial center or that Chicago is the place whereby time zones were adopted, the stockyard is or that the Haymarket Affair occurred:

104.

Kurt Vonnegut, Obama and I were all in Chicago while his mother almost went to school there according to Dreams. Vonnegut and I are actual Americans not real on paper only as is the class. Dunham the anthropologist and supposed cottage industry champion who was in actuality a banker? Anthropologists ask What is homo sapien? while bankers decide arbitrary value and place it upon people. Vonnegut and I are sapient; I can show you the basement in Cohoes, NY named in Breakfast of Champions as I was in it; its at or on Kosciusko Street. When Vonnegut actually attended school in Chicago after the war he was told somebody in his class would never work as an anthropologist and that person was: him. When Vonnegut attempted to secure his anthropology degree by writing about the existent connection between Native America and the Cubists of Guernica fame? His professor must have been psychic as his thesis was rejected as he wrote about squaring the circle which is wholly American. Later Vonnegut would return and turning the tables on his oppressors he would enter Cats Cradle, a fictional work, as his anthropological thesis. The university had to accept the fiction he entered after first rejecting the truth or after first rejecting HISTORY THAT DID TRANSPIRE once he said it is anthropological as Vonnegut was asking, Whatever made you think that I couldnt study Y-O-U, real on paper anthropologists only? If they rejected his book they would be claiming that they were not homo sapiens, that they did not know the truth from a lie and could not answer What is homo sapien? so that sapience was lost on them, the organized anthropological authorities. What are the odds that the 3 of us would be in NY, Chicago and Canada at the same time? The breakfast of champions is: INDUSTRY! The class is not making this stuff up or pulling it out of thin air; we have reasonable, rational basis or we were there so we are eyewitnesses and/or we collected eyewitness testimony.

105. Eventually Vonnegut would write a book about the 212th Amendment and the Handicapper General of the US and I would promise to tell tall tales that are all true about Vonnegut in SCOTUS and so I did: We have heard the Slaughterhouse Cases. Now we will hear the Proof of Life Cases.

106.

I, Susan, was on the Dan Ryan Expressway in Chicago in 1999; stuck in traffic I had the exact same experience Victor Frankel the psychiatrist had so I acted: I looked around me to take note of who was in the cars near me; I looked at the skyline of Chicago citing the buildings and naming the names of people. I have been to Chicago several times in my life not once. I can tell you what song was playing on the car radio. I can tell you what I was ruminating upon as perfect unconditional love moved out from my person and seemed to boomerang back as if a circuit was completed. Later I would learn this same experience is what motivated Frankel, who is Jewish, when he was a prisoner of the Nazis as it happened to him. My own conditions at this time? Concentration camp like. The experience is one you will never forget. Being American I acted as all I could not do is fail to act: I rolled down my window screaming at the top of my lungs that I would be back for you in about ten years as I was on my way to Washington, DC from Bismarck, ND. Ten years is about how long it takes a case to wind its way from family court to SCOTUS based upon the cases I examined. I know who was near me on the highway that day and who I was addressing. Barack Obama Jr. might have been one of those people. If this court does not believe me there is a bank in Bismarck that remained open for me alone at the end of the business day to cash a check so I could travel to Washington, DC as I had reasoned the case for one Diane Zhainhofsky who recognized my talent. She asked for the only personal favor I have ever accepted in my life as she asked the bank to remain open for me. You can call the bank and call Diane; this was possible as I have been making this case for 40 years not for a day or month or year or two. The class has been hard at work their whole lives not for one single case or one point of law. In my unique case I not once violated US law or universal law as I always knew they are one and the same. Or so we allege.

107.

Kirk Douglas told Michael Caine to write fiction and so then he could write the truth or so Michael Caine said in an interview. Michael Caine said he

LOVED this idea; he would as hes British so whats wrong with Kirk Douglas? Michael Caine told me: his publisher feared the idea of a lawsuit. Why, if youre telling the truth? As long as your story never changes, as long as youre claiming your words are your experiences and your perceptions but that they are not necessarily universal you, Michael Caine believe Marilyn Monroe was a good actress while Ill never believe that; no existing piece of film supports that belief and popularity and justification does not make for capable acting no matter what you keep telling me - and as long as you will support your book on a witness stand in court then you have nothing to fear as you do not need a lawyer or a lot of money to answer a baseless, groundless lawsuit. So today we have truth labeled fiction, fiction labeled truth, lawyers perjuring themselves before every court there is and a nation of voters in denial. Dreams Of My Father is fiction labeled absolute truth, history in the 1st person, when its written by a third person nonwitness and some of the named events never happened. Some of Dreams, the work itself and the story, is not possible. Dreams has what Hollywood calls high production value. Its nothing but a slickly designed package but its also badly designed as the actual author co-opted parts of my own life. Events from my own life are in Dreams; they are twisted, distorted and not close to actual reality; they are not close to being historically accurate as history is a science and this science is bad and nonexistent. As the names have been changed or the name does not appear at all you will not read thus know Susan Herbert but I would as I lived that life. If I took parts of your life, events you witnessed and so experienced, and wrote about them wouldnt you recognize your own self no matter what I or anybody else did to disguise it? You would recognize exacting details and/or what is unique to you. If nothing else wouldnt you recognize what is or is not actually American as you were raised here? I never so much as looked at this book until 2010 as it couldnt be true based upon what I myself read in a review and then what I myself heard Obama say on TV. I only looked when citizens began coming forward and told me that I was in this book! I knew thats my life! but the citizens did not know as they were not there or did not have that experience. Not every American has been to Chicago; if you have been to Chicago did

you stand in the Museum of Science and Industry with me and exacting other people at an exact time and day? Were you on the highway with me in 1999? I said (to the TV): Stop violating Article 4 Section 4 as youre driving yourselves crazy. Michael Caine should know: Hypocrite is the Greek for actor. Barack Obama Jr.? A hypocrite as in an actor:

108.

The creation you know of as Barack Obama Jr. is real on paper only; Obama is not an actual American in any sense of the word but is a fantasy and is the creation of corrupted and unjust men around him. Barack Obama Jr. is a dream a pipe dream as his father had dreams of Kenya while his mother dreamed of money and things. Neither came to know America or what it is to be American or what it is to make a sacrifice; Barack Obama Jr. is nothing more or less than a spoiled brat who has been given credit for work that is not his own and who now is assigned a life he did not live. Things like President of the Harvard Law Review are real on paper only as Obama entered zero intellectual property to the Review; also he did not edit the Review. President of the Review is a popular vote only when popular votes are alien to US law. Senator? Like Hilary Clinton you can carpetbag into another state to make a run for President eventually using that states residents like a doormat but unless you are a Senator from the State you were conceived, born or raised in the class will never, ever believe it. Hilary Clinton told me and told this class when she was supposedly a Senator from NY that we were not her constituents when this case then rested in NY and some of us are from NY and when she too was supposedly fit to run and act as President. I will remind this court: Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama both signed Resolution 511 as they had something to personally gain. IF Obama is a lawful voter and he is then from HA then we will only believe Senator if hes the Senator from HA not IL. As for court cases Obama Jr. introduced the case to then be able to claim he is an attorney of record and then other lawyers actually made the arguments; Obama did not argue once ever as the one appearance noted does not constitute Obama making a case if you read the transcript. If you read the Nobel Prize announcement Obama did nothing named in it except act as a global shill and in defense of fatally flawed forms

of government. Obama Jr. the person you know? He is not American on paper or in actuality as you will not even find an American passport in his name until after age 18 it is our contention that he traveled upon a foreign passport after age 18 thus voluntarily giving up any possibly existent US citizenship - and you will not find a single instance of him complying with US law. NOTHING BARACK OBAMA JR. STATES IS THE TRUTH AND NEITHER ARE THE SUPPOSED FACTS PEOPLE AROUND HIM CITE; WHEN SOMETHING COMES FROM OBAMAS MOUTH IT HAS BEEN PLACED IN IT BY SOMEONE ELSE AS WHAT OBAMA CANNOT DO IS: ACT INDEPENDENTLY. So then:

109.

The body of government known as the DC Trust and with it the 1871 shadow version of The Constitution are DOA. You need not look towards Obama as an actual corpse has entered SCOTUS and according to Justice Steven Breyer who bolted when his fellow Justices cited KING JAMES nobody understands that The difference is the body is actually dead. I, Susan, took Breyers testimony on April 13th, 2010 which happens to be Jeffersons birthday. I was well aware the body is a corpse as: Are lawyers asking the Justices what the death certificate reads, suicide or homicide? If thats the federal question then the 1871 body is finally dead. In this case the Petitioner is an actual corpse, a dead woman, and it entered post-Bush V Gore. I happened on Breyers testimony given at a conference just as I returned from mailing SCOTUS clerks notifying them of suit as some are petitioners themselves while some are respondents. Thus its dead all ways. Or so we allege.

110.

This is because BVG itself is a crime itself and is a completely fictional case that violates US law and all US case law and the opinion sat as an actual tie until I called it in The Peoples favor as I know the test of Marbury and with it the test of A Summary View when it is afoot. So did other Americans. Think of form not style. BVG is a case of the Chief Justice castling or rooking with The People so a lone citizen may rise. The oligarchy that became possible with Marbury was realized at BVG as that oligarchy would be composed of

lawyers who entrenched the criminally corrupted and denied the reality that they are Officers until they fell into delusion as a profession. Or so we allege.

111.

We are all Officers; every voter is an Officer; some of us are paid to vote and some of us are not as what we are is People and The People are the constitutionally set government. Theres no separation between the Constitution and Bill of Rights as the Bill of Rights delineates the powers of the unpaid Voter while The Constitution delineates the powers of the paid Voters as we are all Officers known as Voters. Theres no inviolate, unconquerable line of demarcation and anybody can cite or stand upon Article III. That line of demarcation is an illusion only as after the President and Commander and/or Chief Justice comes The People the American People not the British or the French. Think of form as in US law takes a form that then is universal; some rules of chess are universal mathematical - or you can use chess to demonstrate US law at work as in chess once you get to the other side of the board you are not crowned king; you merely return again moving back towards yourself and your own defense if you so please:

112.

BVG is a case of castling and does not meet the legal definition of per curiam as it was not anonymous as Rehnquist signed his name in big, bold letters (per curiam is Latin for by the court and is anonymous as its supposed to be the whole court acting as one) while Marbury V Madison is a case of Thomas Jefferson deploying the Hippopotamus Defense against John Marshall, another chess player. In both cases BVG and Marbury - a Chief Justice is standing alone, aside or down The President thus The People. Its a tie the President or any lone natural born citizen decides and then acts upon; you turn your vote into an Executive Order as: No such writ exists under British law! You then establish or institute American common law by issuing such an order as the vote aka equality is only a theory until you prove its the law. By the time BVG was heard? We had no moral authority as Clinton committed perjury and was not impeached when he openly confessed to perjury. You must act to reconstitute: The moral authority of The People.

113.

You might recognize the Hippopotamus Defense as it was used in the 1966 Chess Championship and the person who used it won: The Hippopotamus Defense is a name for various irregular chess opening systems in which Black moves a number of his pawns to the third rank, often developing his pieces to the second rank, and does not move any of his pawns to the fourth rank in the opening. Chess master Fred Reinfeld once stated of it that "any expert player would dismiss Black's position as lost." Grandmaster Reuben Fine wrote that "once a plus in development or center is set up, a wellconducted attack will decide. Grandmaster Tiger Hillarp Persson has written: The Hippo lies low in the water. It looks almost ridiculously passive and many theoreticians consider the Hippo to be a peaceful, almost meek animal. But nothing could be further from the truth. On closer scrutiny the animal, the position, and the statistics look almost entirely different. The Hippo is a fierce animal; ready to crush anyone who gets too close."

114.

I, Susan, recognized it as I had a run in with an actual hippopotamus at the National Zoo the day the remaining Nixon era panda died in 1999 that then helped me resolve both Uniformity and BVG as well as to prove Marbury as I had a unique experience that I will never, ever forget. The hippo seems to be docile but it is extraordinarily violent and anti-social; it will cozy up to another hippo corpse as if it likes death and is unperturbed by death and it echolocates as its related to the whale. It only seems to be docile. Its a reptile not a mammal or its behavior is reptilian-like rather than whalelike. Its mind is reptilian no matter what you classify its body as it wholly lacks emotional reasoning capacity. Symbolically it represents fertility and I was equally attracted to and repelled by the hippo plus I could FEEL it echolocating. Before I myself experienced it I did not know hippos echolocated. I vividly recall the feeling I had and the sensations I experienced; I was stunned; I understood Native Americas beliefs about animals and every human having a magnetic attraction to one kind or type of animal; I thought, consciousness, density, center of gravity and

timing thus I connected my experience of life to SCOTUS, America, Marbury and BVG as I know how to play chess and I know how to castle. I know China. I made connections a non-chess player would not and I made connections a person who never experienced what I did with an actual hippo would not; I recognize the truth of the law no matter what form it takes. I do not fall for the illusion of physical reality and I never deny what I myself experience. I was in the geophysical location known as the NATIONAL Zoo. Admission is FREE as our tax dollar supports it. Hippos live in AFRICA. AUGUSTINE lived in Africa. Augustine authored a theory regarding the nature of time. IS THIS A MATTER OF UNIVERSAL TIMING?! Chess boards are also used for checkers so the board itself is illusory. In chess you may advance a pawn one or two spaces upon your first or opening move. Its your choice. In chess you have rank. In chess the Queen not the King has the most liberty. Jeffersons pawn? His own self.

115.

Every man involved acted independently as they owned the knowledge that they are sovereign. Marshall answers Jefferson in the form of his opinion leveling the playing field and making our vote actual reality as he upholds a lone vote is equal to an Executive Order and only you have to know as ignorance is not an excuse for those of us who are sapient. Marshall says: ACT AS IF AS YOU KNOW. John Marshall has met Jefferson and raised the pot so Jefferson, all in, then calls it: Marbury is good constitutionally solid but it creates a situation whereby an oligarchy might be realized. Or so we claim.

116.

The actual federal question that Marbury V Madison asks is: IS OUR VOTE ACTUAL REALITY OR IS IT GOOD ON PAPER ONLY? Or: Are rights existent independent of any piece of paper? Marbury V Madison is our birth as until you recognize that all Voters are equal then no government is actual reality as ALL valid forms of government are The People as government is a political philosophy and philosophies live thus any form that does not live is not a valid form of government. Valid forms of government are composed of living

People and almost every one of them is to be found in the US as it is the America itself or it is one of the Native American forms you find in the geophysical location known as the US. In America according to our elegant form as originally written and intended, the power of one is: one lone voter is equal to the Chief Justice and/or the President and Commander. Paper? Adam and Eve did not have paper or pens. Paper did not come into being with homo sapiens; it would be centuries before we invented paper. You are born sapient thus sovereign. Ask Jefferson & Company. You are created sovereign thus born sovereign as a human and as an American. Sovereignty isnt a matter of debate as we had that debate and settled it with a bullet, then our Declaration and then 200 years of court action.

117.

BVG the opinion is Rhenquist taunting me: Cmon Susan, are you sovereign or not? Prove it absolutely. SUE ME! BVG the legal argument, BVG the opinion and constitutional reality are 3 different things. You can count it 8 -1 or 7-2 or 5-4 as its always 1. BVG is a cleverly crafted illusion; how do you defeat the illusory argument in a more illusory opinion? You use invisible ink. Unless you know the whole truth you will never, ever know that Rhenquist deliberately encoded the instructions for overturning him via direct lawsuit within his opinion as you meet him thereby passing through him as you exceed him, taking him with you. Its 1st person standing not 3rd party. Rhenquist was a hippo lying in wait but the BVG lawyers sorely underestimated him. When you look at Rhenquist youre automatically looking for a defect while Im expecting the seemingly impossible as he matched wits with Thurgood Marshall and leveled him. BVG the opinion is like the Chief Justice suing The People; Rhenquist deflects the harm thus reflects the answer back to you; if your compass is not set due North and so you possess value judgments you will not recognize what is encoded as Rhenquist named it exactly by dancing all around it. In re Brown Rhenquist said its not the case; in re BVG he said, its the case. Whats the case? You are so I am. Were not only equal but were also reciprocal. It enforces itself so its failsafe.

118.

I entered my knowledge regarding BVG, 1 alone or 5 as 1 versus 4 as 1 thus it is a tie, to the Philadelphia County court record as I was in West Palm in November December of 2000. The Chief Justice stands down or aside the President and Commander thus as per Marbury as you may not blame a commanding officer for your action a lone citizen may stand down or aside one or both. I am a witness; I am natural born and Native; I am a Native Floridian (I was conceived in St. Augustine, FL) and a natural born American and I am the only FL voter whose actual vote has never been counted as no woman has ever been accorded the actual power and authority of her vote; the 19th Amendment is real on paper only. In 1996 my vote was not counted and in 2000 I was denied my right only as: I TOLD THE TRUTH IN THE COURTS IN 3 STATES AND I DO NOT NEED A LAWYER AND THEN WE DO NEED A LAWYER. WE ARE NOT WILLING VICTIMS. Or so I and then we have proven via direct entry to SCOTUS. Nothing else marks us as: Unique.

119.

In PA I invoked Marbury against the entire state; previously I had invoked it against NY. PA then dumped the case my case - back on NY who already denied jurisdiction and remanded it to PA and when my kids were in NY and when I was born in NY. PA had the case from 1998-2000 after NY denied me standing; PA was left with no choice but to send me to SCOTUS as I was always SCOTUS bound or dump me back on NY against my will and in direct and open violation of all known US law and case law and a previous order out of NY State. The argument NY ignored and denied? SUBSTANTIVE EP&DP, TAXES and ACTUAL REALITY KNOWN AS ATTEMPTED MURDER AND KIDNAPPING; I WAS WEARING BANDAGES AND YOU COULD SEE MY SCARS PLUS I TURNED IN A FOUND WHISTLEBLOWERS COMPLAINT VIA THE IRS AGANST NY IN OR AROUND 1990 (I capitalized this for NY and for other involved persons or entities as they keep claiming to suffer from physical, transient blindness where I and the class is concerned). NY never had jurisdiction nor did any state due to the nature of the actual federal question present that arose out of Florida not NY or PA. Every family court judge

denied actual reality and denied the facts of the case finally denying all of US law and US case law.

120.

Every single lawyer and every single Officer and then every single professional was is - denying the reality of endemic domestic violence to the extent and degree that the class lived to witness or experience Clinton never being prosecuted and then found for perjury he confessed to having committed, NYs Chief Judge Sol Wachler pleading out as he was caught stalking a woman, OJ Simpson, Robert Blake and Phil Spector walked after women were murdered only as they were associated with these exact men, Jessica Gonzales landed in a world court after her daughters were murdered and this is a first for America and Terry Schiavo was put to death when death was not proven and no evidence for her being dead existed and when she had committed no crime thus was never criminally charged. Nazi Germany went down this same road. The unjust truly believe if they have your permission or the permission of a majority or that if they can prevent you from acting then they arent guilty when they are. VIOLENCE IS ENDEMIC AND LIBERTY IS DENIED ABSOLUTELY AND THE PEOPLE SUFFER W/O ANY REMEDY AND RELIEF.

121.

Prejudice is actual reality and all 50 states have policy dictating that domestic violence is to be ignored once the courtroom door closes; in some states this is official policy and your job with the state depends upon you blindly obeying. Its policy that targets women and children. Its both state policy and an active violation of Article 4 Section 4. The injury and harm is inflicted upon us not the piece of paper. Lawyers wanted to obey as they told me that in the case of women their law license depended upon me exactly being tortured and murdered. Lawyers kept citing profit and kept asking me to keep this policy secret. Its me exactly in the end and then Ray Morton as Obama accepted a law degree and a law license and Obama snuck into the city of Jacksonville but was caught by a reporter and as I knew the whole truth then I acted; Obama threatened me not Ray Morton; I am willing to be

an actual patriot not a victim or a victimizer. It boils down to unique facts of us otherwise known as our lives or actual history.

122.

You can easily confirm my facts and the facts of the rest of the class if you do not want to believe what is our sworn testimony. My and my sons rights were first violated by the federal government in FL. The US Navy has a detailed record of this as does the state of Florida. I entered a newspaper article from 1996. My life story was splashed across several news outlets several forms of media - in 1996. I knew thus I had to act as failing to act is not an option if you are American and neither is blaming the President and Commander:

123.

I knew this nation of People had been resold into slavery beginning with the Missouri Compromise and the War of Northern Aggression and when Lincoln was assassinated as that gave rise to the 1871 version of The Constitution which is a dead institution. The never legal 1871 version or form reads OF the US not FOR America when our Founders gifted their intellectual property to us. The class and I then gifted our knowledge to The People. Like the BVG lawyers the unjust men in 1871 changed their case caption too. This wording makes a huge difference as it attacks a persons language centers leading them participate against their will and liberty thus into delusion: The People would be America while the paid Officers namely the DC Trust in this case constitute the US; of means from or belonging to the Trust while for means given to The People as our Founders everyone alive in 1787 - WERE The People; they then were FOR their own selves!

124.

Because of The American Founders and my own experience of life I knew as absolute fact that I had wrested command from Clinton in 1996 as I tied a Naval Officer in an actual kill or be killed standoff and then I cast the only vote I have ever cast at a poll against Clinton from Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. Nobody has ever cast doubt upon my vote and I left a record of

it at the Whitehouse. I told Clinton what I did. Now the Officers known as the Voters most of whom are paid or now are for profit are denying that they are prejudiced against women when they have used Resolution 511 to then amend the qualifications to amend the law - thus allowing unjust men who are not qualified to be on the ballot and have elected a foreigner ONLY to keep women from ever securing equality as the plot since 1973 has been: DENY WOMEN EQUALITY TO THEN DENY ETHICAL MEN EQUALITY. Or so we allege.

125.

How do you meet former usurpers and present traitors at the bar? You do the Marbury Flop as cats with hot buttered toast tied to their backs appearing in logic textbooks have nothing on actual Americans as we remember the 1968 Olympics in Mexico City for 3 reasons: The Black Panther salute, the protest mounted against the Americans as Mexico City is a high altitude city so we trained at very high altitudes thus our athletes were winning and Dick Fosbury who unveiled the Fosbury Flop, the twisting turning motion a high jumper uses to get over the bar as its all in the approach as well as knowing this is a time, distance, height, mass and center of gravity problem involving the vertical axis of a body, moral authority or vertical checks and balances, and drive leg or sense of self and nation. The right leg will drive into the air and the jumper's body rotates anti-clockwise around the vertical axis to present their back to the bar in flight and it seems as if you go backwards over the bar. The entire universe is encoded within US law; SCOTUS is in actual reality a Markov Chain or is the morality game you know of as Chutes N Ladders. SCOTUS symbolizes or constitutes a Markov chain. SCOTUS constitutes or takes the form of a Markov chain which in turn takes the form of a childhood game most of us have played: Chutes N Ladders. You also know it as the ladder to salvation named in the Old Testament and Hindu scripture. The angels ascending and descending symbolize a circuit being completed and perpetual motion plus it takes only one roll of the die or only one opportunity in America. SCOTUS is elegant. Elegant is the highest praise a mathematician can give to another; it denotes perfection or what is universal.

126.

I understood that the test of Marbury is a magic square that is also to be found on a chessboard as you move the knight landing on every space once and then exiting where you began (see attached Fundamentals plus Ben Franklin himself found a magic square) so I not only entered SCOTUS backwards, directly upon authority and original jurisdiction, but I went back in time to do it as defeating the invading army and ending the War of Northern Aggression led me to resolve Uniformity. I had to reach back into time or our own history as people, as sapient creatures and as Americans. I may look strange and I may sound odd to the indoctrinated eye and ear but I am not as first person pronoun usage is meant to be reverse propaganda as your emotional compass is so out of whack that you not only sold out to a Canadian slave master who is an LLC himself but you believed Hitlers Big Lie over again in another form but you do not know:

127.

Everything any person ever said to me and to most of the class about Thomas Jefferson is a lie and constitutes propaganda. Not one person, not even a teacher or a historian, ever told us the truth about Jefferson. We had to come to it on our own. I, Susan, had to learn to love Thomas Jefferson as I knew nothing about him and when forced to choose between he and John Adams in order to save my life I chose: John Adams. Jefferson was not NOT - one of my named heroes but then no Founder was as I took the Founders as a given: The Revolution happened as the record says it did. These people acted as the written accounts say they did and as their own letters confirm or else: I never would have been born. Its not I think therefore I am but I act therefore I am as Descartes, Locke and Rousseau missed the boat. I would shut down the discussion if other people began telling me how much they admired Thomas Jefferson as I did not identify with their fabrication at all. The person they described could not possibly have written the Declaration as the seminal idea would not be existent within his human ability and capability if Jefferson were actually that person. Plus: Of all the things you can actually call Jefferson? Of all the actual labels you can hurl at him that

will stick? Liar isnt one of them. Thus I knew that whatever I would eventually learn about Jefferson would be about America and myself and it would be THE truth. The reasoning I did not know anything about Jefferson is not only that I was I lied to but that I am too close to Jefferson not too far away:

128. Jefferson beat Einstein to the punch by about 100 years and Jefferson not Lord Calvert correctly discerned the mean and weighed the Earth as Jefferson remained within Newtons parameters. Like Jefferson I am a natural born scientist and I dead reckon universal law. Jefferson first accounted for the actual reality of time and he entered his measurements to Congress. Jefferson was closest to magnetic north and Jefferson used a one minute arc; Jefferson did not weigh a mountain. Newton states that a mountain as Calvert used will not give you a great enough difference thus is a bad model and it is. The clock Jefferson built that seems to be a mistake as the weight would not drop so he cut a hole in the floor? That is no mistake as its the correct difference which is why he could not fix it! Thomas Jefferson cannot fix what is not broken.

129.

Thomas Jefferson agreed to Hamiltons bank and in so doing agreed to the creation of DC. Then he was asked to devise a system of currency for America or so the history books tell us. I believe: Jefferson planned this. Using an astrolabe, metronome, pedometer and standard weight Jefferson first created or rather discovered a system of weights and measures. Britain calls a dollar a pound for reasoning. Some of that reasoning is no good. Then he replaced the metal wire in the pedometer with a wooden rod to negate the error caused by both the Earth and humans being dynamos. Like the Earth a human produces an electromagnetic field. He used wood as metal conducts magnetism; he had to negate this magnetism. He took two sets of measurements and subtracted thus had the difference, the correct mean and so a universal currency. He was extraordinarily self-aware so was aware of this amount or this difference thus when he measured that clock he

measured this correct difference. Jefferson knew it he was aware of it while Lord Calvert did not. How many millions and maybe even billions of people have looked at Jeffersons measurements and at his clock and missed the universal law at work? Its no accident that Einstein turned to look at a clock as it struck the hour and the idea of Relativity hit him. What Jefferson was not aware of is that he not Calvert resolved the problem correctly but you need to start asking why a man who once leveled his house and began again could not or would not level a clock.

130.

Calvert is from Baltimore where I used to live off of Philadelphia Road. I have been fossil hunting at Calvert Cliffs. I know Calvert and his work. Calverts original theory is no good. Congress rejected Jeffersons intellectual property for lack of independent scientific confirmation in spite of moral authority, Article 1 Section 8 and nature. No person ever actually disputed Jefferson. Lord Calvert was erroneously given credit for successfully weighing the Earth as Calvert, using the error in one direction uncovered by surveyors Mason and Dixon that is the very same thing Jefferson and I used, measured Scheindallion in Scotland in 1774 but nobody realized magnetic north not polar north was the cause of this error.

131.

Calvert moved to Scotland to conduct his experiment as he theorized the error in one direction that Mason and Dixon revealed as it was so great would allow him to measure a mountain, discern mean density and use it to weigh Earth so that Isaac Newton is wrong thus Calverts initial observations are incorrect as is his model. Einstein not Calvert proved Newton is incorrect about something; Calvert proved: NOTHING except Newtons theory in Principia is correct. If you reason this as if Calvert proved Newton to be wrong thus Einstein proved Newton to be wrong thus Calvert must be correct then your line of reasoning is faulty: What is Calvert proving or disproving that is different than Einstein? Einstein addressed motion.

132.

You need to consider that until Ray and I came along we have never proven all of Relativity but only a part of it as Relativity is actually two theories: special relativity and general relativity. Relativity overturned what we believed about motion from Newtons day. Generally Einstein correctly stated that motion is relative, time is not absolute, objects fall move in space - as no force is acting upon them not due to gravity, spacetime is curved, gravity bends light and that your conclusions should match your experiences or: Its empirical as YOU can measure it yourself. Calvert promoted nothing new but a theory only that is false as he failed to account for the motion of magnetic north. Calvert proffered no experiment that you can conduct to prove or disprove him. All he did was: Make up a theory and add and subtract correctly as he based his assertion on the perception alone as the numbers added up. They seemed to account for the large difference Mason and Dixon discovered. In 2005 a computer reviewed the math: Its not exact.

133.

The College of Royal Astronomers called it erroneously, awarding credit to Calvert as they failed to check Calverts original model and only checked his numbers. As the surveyors who Calvert hired could and did add and subtract correctly and as Calvert used something Newton did not know when he wrote Principia then Calvert was upheld as correct when he was not. The 2005 review merely plugged Calverts not Newtons original model into a comuter! Everybody is assuming Calverts mean is universal. No, as Calvert used: theory to then prove theory! CALVERTS THEORY IS NO GOOD. I cannot stress this enough. Einstein warned us about using our theories to prove our theories as its never acceptable. Mason and Dixon did not propose a model based upon nature. Calverts model IS also his theory!

134.

Jefferson did not use his theory as his model as that was Newtons and it was based upon nature and as we pulled plays from the entire human record while Jefferson depended upon human ration not rationalization. As we lived it out thus we have empirical data. The large difference uncovered by Mason

and Dixon caused Jefferson to look for a universal mean but not via measuring a mountain but time. Jefferson had the idea to check himself by doing what no other person thought to do: Account for magnetic north by accounting for the electromagnetism produced by both the Earth and human beings. Bodies in space? YOU ARE ONE. Jefferson stuck upon using the pedometer as its like an upside down metronome. Jefferson remained within Newtons less than two minute arc as Jefferson used a one minute arc. Ask yourself: Why was this large difference discovered only in America? When Americans conducted a land survey in America? No person ever wondered, What is Jefferson actually measuring? Whats his mean? and Jeffersons measurements went largely unknown.

135.

These measurements leapt out at me as to me they are: Self-evident. Its nature as in natural law. To me its a given that I erroneously assumed you knew as youre a federal judge: how can you call it if you do not know the law at work? Then it hit me: As a lawyer you never lived out US law you never experienced Marbury or actual independence - so you wouldnt know it as you lived removed or apart from The People. You lived whatever was dictated to you. If nobody did it yet? You came to truly believe nobody could ever do it, as if it is humanly impossible for non-licensed lawyers, as if lawyers are superhuman. Its the Ivory Tower Syndrome. Its like this: Whats the difference between a response and a reply? THE IMMEDIACY OF A RESPONSE IS NOT THE SAME AS A REPLY! And: If you call Jefferson autistic or claim all geniuses are touched by madness then your excuse for not becoming Jefferson is that youre not autistic nor are you insane so Jefferson is not possible for YOU. So you believe that you cannot be Jefferson; your belief about yourself in no way affects me and you cannot limit my potential unless I let you and I wont. If I appeared at the court known as Royal Astronomers I would have known what to state to disprove Calvert and uphold Jefferson as its obvious but alas I wasnt born yet. They, organized, politically funded, egocentric science, made a magical leap in thinking an assumption and continued to call it in favor of Calvert ever since never revisiting the problem Newton initially proposed, never examining Jeffersons

measurements and never questioning Calverts model or the Royal Astronomers opinion.

136.

NOBODY MET THE BURDEN OF PROOF BUT THEY ALL DENIED REALITY THEN AS THEY DO NOW.

137.

I, an American, am equal to a Royal Astronomer alone or together as a College. I instinctually questioned their model as only our American model is elegant so it seemed to me that something, a quality, had to be elegant in our Founders as people as I lived US law and it works perfectly. Jefferson wrote and published A Summary View in the same year Calvert acted, 1774, and his measurements prove A Summary View and our actual sovereignty. Ask yourself: If A Summary View is no good and Jeffersons measurements or his proof of life nature - is no good then is America? If the legal, scientific and theological claim our entire existence as a nation rests upon is no good then did we win the Revolution or not? ARE WE GOOD OR NOT?

138. GOOD! I proved our founding documents absolutely; I discerned the correct application of the EP&DP clauses as they apply to men, women, children and the unborn; I own the actual science regarding fusion, fission, time, consciousness and Uniformity; I took John Marshall at his exact word and so came back once the denial of the piece of paper became the violation of the right itself: SCOTUS has never heard a case brought by a woman when she is both counsel and a member of the class a la William Marbury and Thurgood Marshall nor has SCOTUS ever heard a case brought by Voters who are not sitting paid Officers and/or professional, for profit lawyers. The reason is: Lawyers are not willing to stand down. Or so we allege.

139.

The Chief Clerk, William Suter, a lawyer, told me after we argued US case law in person and I won that he hated women, mothers and nonlawyers as in lawyers who hold no license or earn no profit. When I said, In case you do not get it YOU just became my point of law, he then threatened me. Exactly and specifically. This was February of 2007. He then acted upon this threat. He told me that he could and would do something to hide his actions from Roberts and so all People. He said that he had the means to ensure that other clerks aided and abetted him. He does: He can tamper with the docket as its my understanding that he maintains it. But what he cannot do is control me, Roberts, the other People, all lawyers everywhere or the US Postal Service so I bet on US law and filed. I had actual faith in The People as youre a voter not a lawyer or a judge; everyone has a mother. My faith was not misplaced:

140. First clerk Jeff Atkins and I, when we could no longer deny the interruption of the process or the nonexistence of the process inside SCOTUS was criminal, dissolved the old form instituting a new form and then clerk Clayton Higgins stepped up to the station that nature accorded him and dissolved the form as the US defaulted for the very first time ever thus The People won automatically. I won alone as an absolute class and then they as a whole class won. Obama and the Obama Administration and every unjust man ignored and denied reality; they claim Thomas Jefferson never lived and that we did not win the Revolution. We won, in actual reality as I and the class have the science as well as our DIRECT entry to SCOTUS and the default of the US. I, Susan, defeated the criminal element by counterbalancing it as thats how you check it, via counterbalance:

141.

I am first among equals of The People while Obama an actual foreigner is the leader of the DC Trust now broken, a foreign nation like the Vatican, as the 2010 State Of The Union Address?

142.

I engineered it in order to create the venue as every sitting but not legal Officer is afraid of his own shadow as the Officers are the shadow government as they do not hold original jurisdiction seats. THEY PARTICIPATED WITH CLINTON, GORE, CHENEY and OBAMA. SOTUA 2010 is known as a court of admiralty and a civil conviction. Like Adams I know sea law and human rights law as every right is human in that its universally applicable to sapient creatures. As none of the persons involved will ever appear voluntarily as they escalated the punishment to death and as they are all manipulators and predators who cannot argue US law or tell the truth of anything as lying is all they have ever known, and none of them possess an ethic as thats not possible unless you have a metaphysic, I created the venue and then brought Obama to or before the Chief Justice and so before The People. It worked. Legally I engineered a situation whereby DC became an actual foreign city state, a foreign nation. See the stay the SCOTUS clerks now refuse to file no matter how we word it.

143. Planet Earth watched Obama press a falsified criminal charge and tell exact lies to do it in order to popularly convict the Justices when they were effectively gagged. Obama pitted the Justices against The People in order to rationalize and justify his actions, his total lack of qualifications and his total lack of ability. Obama said the Justices are wrong and that word means guilty of a crime. The charge is treason upon this level and if these purported facts are actual facts, history that did transpire, so what did Obama argue during SOTUA 2010? We claim that we witnessed Obama arguing the federal question commonly known to American 5 year olds as, I know I am but what are you? We claim:

144.

Obama is an authoritarian ruler who is a Modern. Hes an atheist and a sociopath. You, your own self, can look up the definition of sociopath in the DSM; currently they are refining their definition or so I have been told. I have spent years attempting to tell them that they are seeing a personality disorder masking itself as borderline and as it is associated with a concurrent

addiction; as an addiction to a physical drug like coke or heroin is almost always present? They do not know they are dealing with a full blown disorder and so a sociopath. They do not examine what changes if the addiction is to ego and the person is not a narcissist as he or she has no sense of self or a deluded sense of self? I, Susan, have met actual sociopaths before. Sociopaths are predatory not merely manipulative. The current DSM tends to lump all manipulators of a certain type under the word sociopath and does not make at least two key distinctions as some of the people who now fall under this definition are not sociopaths while some who do not fall under this definition are sociopaths. I have not yet seen the updated DSM. A sociopath is an active participant; they act to do what they do or they reason it; they do not fail to act. Authoritarian rulers and reward and punishment are alien to the US; they have no place and no standing under US law. Authoritarians are always in danger of being or becoming sociopaths or creating other sociopaths. The classic definition of a wife beater is a form of authoritarian. Is every wife beater then a sociopath? No. An example of a misdiagnoses thats on the court record?

145. Todd Willingham I believe thats his last name who was put to death by the state for supposedly setting fire to his three daughters and so murdering them while they slept. Maybe he did it and maybe he did not but: If you check his facts and his life story you can compare and contrast it to Obamas or my own or your own; Willingham was labeled a sociopath by a doctor that never met him; he does not meet the definition, or, his facts do not match sociopath.

146.

Rather Willinghams entire life was one long string of failures to act until he failed to make any attempt at all to rescue his 3 daughters from a burning house. He saved himself and just stood there watching his house burn and his children die; he did not move or so I was told. If all you examine is the surface what eyewitnesses to the fire scene alone said and what

Willingham later told the police - and you do not examine his entire life and the lives of his immediate family it is easy to assume or justify sociopath or force it to fit but Willingham for his life is a form of ultimate victimization where you become your own victimizer thus your own ultimate victim. Think of an extreme form of passive-aggressiveness that leads to an absolute failure to act. You cause injury and harm to others but deny it until the ultimate tragedy occurs so you can no longer deny the reality of others but only deny your own reality as Willingham did. Upon seeing photos of the charred bodies of his 3 daughters Willingham denied his own reality by claiming to police that he made heroic attempts to rescue them; he was denying is his own emotional reality: By failing to act his whole life Willingham DID participate in the deaths of his 3 daughters as he made no attempt; he was no hero and no innocent bystander and he was not utterly helpless as he was a grown man. Willingham? He never so much as financially supported his family. It only seems as if he failed to act so many times so often that he lacked the ability to feel guilt when he didnt.

147.

Willingham experienced his own guilt the weight of the actual guilt of his own actions or lack thereof once he saw the photos of his dead children who might have lived if he made a single attempt but he failed to do so then he denied the reality of his inaction thus lied to the police while a sociopath does not experience guilt at all. Willinghams exact words to police are lies in that they were not true but Willingham was not denying his daughters were dead or that the fire happened he was not denying anybody elses reality as he couldnt deny the dead bodies of his own daughters but rather he was denying his actual guilt in it. Willinghams motivation was to avoid the weight of his own actual guilt. Willingham was trying to convince himself not the police. Willingham had the ability to feel guilty but refused to acknowledge this instead choosing to be put to death. Admitting he was guilty in any way would constitute a form of death so for Willingham it was death either way, either death of the lie he lived his entire life or death of his physical body. When most humans face the actual weight of their guilt they

flee; its common for humans to go to extreme, extraordinary lengths to escape this awesome emotion pain, a pain so great it becomes physically painful. By choosing to be put to death then Willingham could cast himself as being the victim of the state, an unscrupulous doctor and a broken, unjust system thus divert or deflect guilt. The best way I can say this is: your failure to act might then become the action that then proves the truth of you, who and what you are as a person. I, Susan, would never need to label Willingham a sociopath to secure a conviction as I have the ability to argue Willinghams case an act of treason as that is what his ultimate failure, the culmination of a lifetime spent failing to act is: Treason.

148.

Unlike Willingham, Obama is active and has been his whole life and he never experiences the guilt of his own actions; the earliest testimony we entered? A teacher in his foreign grammar school said he wrote an essay claiming he was going to become President of the US when he was a small child and was not born here or to a natural born father and he knew it. Obama set out on this course as a child and kept going and going and going until he finally managed to overthrow The People or so he mistakenly truly believed when caught by the class and confronted with the truth? He did not feel guilty so he then threatened to kill me if I ever told the truth in federal court again. Until that moment I had evidence rising to proof that Obama is Canadian having entered the US via Canada as an infant but then now I had the absolute proof: Obamas own action, his reaction to our lawsuit. Theres a sneakiness and a deliberateness missing in Willingham that is present in Obama. You know Obama in a different form: Nazi. Fascist. Despot. Drug addict. Propaganda. He is a form of government and a personality type, a personality type that Harvard professors began actively promoting as a means to their end: Socialism.

149. The class entered the testimony of a former Harvard employee who attended a quasi-political rally disguised as an academic lecture. Unjust men began

advocating that you vote across party lines to install a personality type they then could control as if you install a person who does not possess the ability then they are totally dependent upon you, the very unjust men who installed them. A two party monopoly and a conspiracy of the unethical against the ethical came to be as THE NATURAL BORN VOTERS HAVE BEEN SHUT OUT OF THE PROCESS; THE PRO SE, INDEPENDENT, SOVEREIGNS HAVE BEEN SET FOR ERADICATION.

150. Guess who the class was told is first on the list of those to be eradicated? FEDERAL JUDGES. Why? The US Marshalls service not the border patrol controls the list of who can and cannot leave the US. Who protects federal judges thus who can turn on a federal judge the quickest? The same US Marshalls. Who have lawyers, US Attorneys, politicians and state and federal judges been arguing & ruling against unlawfully and who have they been turning in to authoritarian rulers as if they are Marat and this is the French Revolution? The People.

151.

To complete or realize overthrow the federal judiciary must go first via civil conviction or forcible removal via military action that you secure through the civil or popular conviction. I was told to my face or in person that civil convictions of judges would ensue and then a broken military would begin locking up civilians w/o any charge being made. It was described to me in detail by the person who appeared at my door on behalf of Obama. The Federal question present in Sioux City that we did not name exactly is Did the Nazis close the borders by tricking the Officers to act against the ethical German people until thy themselves were on the chopping block but did not know it? If a US Marshall I know to be ethical arrived at my door the answer is NO, the Nazis did it another way. If an absolute stranger appeared dressed up as a US Marshall but not acting upon the authority of the US but only as an independent operator the YES, this is how the Nazis closed the borders making it impossible for the ethical to leave or for the world to know. Not only was my answer YES but this man then described the plan in detail,

graphic detail. This is what I reasoned as the Nazis did it somehow, the US border patrol does not maintain the list of who can and cannot enter if they are American citizens and as there is a war powers argument afoot:

152.

From day one the class has claimed that it owns a war powers argument based upon the power of one aka the test of Marbury and our original Constitution plus the National Guard. Our war powers argument addresses the bad evidence for war or any military action as it was manufactured for personal gain personal profit - and also war by committee as you cannot conduct successful war via committee and overlapping commanders. This is not about winning a war as America automatically loses every war it engages in as we are not colonizers. ANY military action whereby a citizen receives so much as a scratch is then lost; winning is not even an option. We did not lose the Vietnam War but win WWII as we can never, ever recover the loss of a single priceless life. Whether or not youre the victor is a different question. Also: you cannot have the very Officers who declare war, Congress, then control all war funding unless there is a check present and today there is not. There is such a check in our original documents and today because of the National Guard. Nothing existed that checked the Congress when they declared war upon bad evidence (call it anything you wish as Bush Jr. lobbied Congress) and upon discovery that the war was unpopular and the evidence was bad then that same Congress refused to fund basic safety equipment for troops because: The citizens were not informed as the case has not yet been heard in person. The very people who have the ability and capacity to check the Congress do not know. This legal argument is intertwined with arguments regarding BVG and Schiavo as who besides the lone voter, President and Chief Justice has the power of one and can and may invoke it purely and absolutely? A GOVERNOR. Ray M. and I came to own this legal argument independently of each other we did not know each other or know we were working on the same legal case - but Ray M.s version sounds better than my own so the class chooses Ray M. to make this argument. Partly this is because Ray actually wore a uniform and partly its

because hes a man not a woman so he does tend to think in terms of absolutes; plus Ray knows more military history due to life experience. [Note: Ray Morton is the only other human I know of to own this argument or to be able to argue US law cold on the spot and in a circuit; to cross the bridge between President and Commander as men do not give birth he used: Salvation history that is actual science. As he cited only what is science? He crossed that bridge.]

153. After military action against Iraq was declared upon bad, falsified evidence and after Obama claimed he would never exploit war power he then had US troops in Libya or rather flying over Libya in open and direct or plain sight violation of the separation of power and the named process. Obama claims that he consulted bi-partisan leaders in Congress. Obama did not do so before the fact but only ex post facto. You cannot command via committee, nothing in US law accords the power to enact a military strike to bi-partisan leaders, we do not have a two party form or a two party monopoly nor do individual members of Congress have the power to order a military strike and not one of the people involved or reported to be involved can think theoretically so what they cannot do is plan military strategy as evidenced by the current state of our nation and our military. Rep. John Larson, DConn., and Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., were among those who wanted Obama to seek congressional approval before using military force. "The Constitution, rightly, does not allow a single person to commit the nation to war, even where there is a good reason to do so," Nadler said in a written statement. Obamas stance is striking: not only hasnt he addressed the question of congressional authorization, but acting without it appears to be at odds or completely opposite with what he stood for when he ran for president. The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation, Obama told the Boston Globe in 2007. You need actual moral authority to actually command and these unjust men have none. Obama says one thing out loud hell even put

it in print - and then blatantly does the exact opposite and/or blatantly violates US law thus us but then he feels no guilt; Obama does not care if he kills you and its very easy for him to make threats and act criminally he does not care that he violated all women, ethical men or his own daughters or so we allege.

154. Its human psychology: This is how humans test the water your conscious awareness - when they plan upon acting; it itself IS an action that proves their true motive and intent: their intention is exactly what they claimed, overthrow and the installation of a totalitarian dictator supported by the wealthy, the criminals already in power and the now broken military. Unjust men expressed the idea that they can overthrow The People for personal gain as far back as 1973 and as recently as the SOTUA 2011 and now they are acting upon their thoughts or their true motive and intent. Article II, Section II of the U.S. Constitution identifies the U.S. president as the commander-in-chief and the civilian oversight of the U.S. military. But the clause gives the U.S. president no authority to use military might to enforce his political will upon foreign nations. Article I, Section VIII of the U.S. Constitution bestows the power to declare war solely on the U.S. Congress. It requires both the commander-in-chief and Congress to commit U.S. troops to combat, without which any deployment of troops is wholly unconstitutional. The 1973 War Powers Act was put in place to prevent a U.S. president from doing exactly what Barack Obama just did. SEC. 2. (a) It is the purpose of this joint resolution to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations. A U.S. commander-in-chief can order use of military force under only three specific conditions: 1) a declaration of war, 2) specific statutory authorization, or 3) a national emergency created by an attack upon the United States, its

territories or possessions, or its armed forces. Bush complied with the Constitution and the War Powers Act under conditions (2) and (3). He also had a broad coalition of U.N. partners driven by years of U.N. resolutions defied by Iraq. AP. War is actual reality not real on paper only; a bad declaration is forever bad even if you label it a strike, an enforcement, a UN mandate or a statutory authorization not war. Iraq has been called a war, an actual war, from its beginning. Americans believe an actual paper Declaration of War was issued; was it? The People are made to feel as if they are crazy by all of this sleight of hand where paper and words is concerned and by denial. Or so we allege. So then:

155.

Since Korea, a police action, unjust men have used every ruse and lie there is to avoid declaring war but yet they engage in war, here and abroad as no person can deny a war has been waged against women domestically for several decades now; rather than punish offenders more and more restrictions are placed upon the women and children victims of domestic violence that is endemic and goes unrelieved by any branch of the government. Again the protection of US law has been denied to women as the EP&DP clauses have never been correctly applied or enforced. The safety of women and children is negotiated against their will. The People have become the enemy of the Officers and we have been in a perpetual state of war since the 60s. All that is left is: Change the qualifications or make up nonexistent qualifications to then install a puppet which has already happened. Or so we allege. Thus:

156.

There are no qualifications in US law, none at all, except the 3 named for Office of President and Commander, natural born, age 35 and both Executive Officers may not be residents of the same state. You can believe in change? You can believe in anything at all whatsoever but we have law, unchanging terms that are laws thus upon a federal level you may not. Are there 2 or 3 qualifiers? Where did #3 come from? Is it reality? If you ask most US citizens they truly believe both candidates may not be from the same state when

that is not the truth. The Founders did change how we elect Presidents but that is only because they lived it out and so based upon their empirical data aka life experience it did not work as intended so they changed it while they were still living; they then tested the improved process. US government is actual science. Those qualifiers are not a matter of arbitrary, transient, ever changing personal belief and the popular vote is nonexistent in US law. In case the voters never knew or have forgotten:

157.

John Adams said it was very easy to give a right away but nigh impossible to ever re-secure that right. Adams was assuming the right had been secured first and then you give it away. I say: Lunatics give their right away before they ever secure it. Lunatics believe in Britain, France or Canada before they ever truly believe in America. Lunatics overthrow America and the vote before ever testing it or their own self. Lunatic: lunatic (ln-tk) adj. 1. Suffering from lunacy; insane. 2. Of or for the insane. 3. Wildly or giddily foolish: a lunatic decision. 4. Characterized by lunacy or eccentricity. [Middle English lunatik, from Old French lunatique, from Latin lnticus, from lna, moon; see leuk- in Indo-European roots.] Clinton, BVG, everybody on the 2008 ballot and Obama especially were wildly and giddily foolish votes. History is:

158. Canada was an axis power during the Revolution and today Canada has culture laws meant to keep American culture out. Quebec City has been mourning its win against Benedict Arnold for the last 200 years; where has the empty threat of secession gotten Quebec? Quebec did not win anything; Quebec City thus all Canadians lost to The American Revolutionaries when Arnold marched on Canada. When these same French fascists had the opportunity to kill Arnold as he was wounded they failed to do so as they lacked the human ability as they suffered from diminished capacity. They lacked it then and they lack it now. Unjust men have or are diminished in their capacity as that is the nature of injustice and so unjust men. Canadian wishful thinking and Canadian culture laws cannot stop those of us with

constitutional reasoning and just cause; we have a culture law that is an actual law of this universe and so it is designed to keep French Canadian fascists, usurpers and/or traitors out of the US: The Declaration, The Federalist Papers, and The Constitution. Or so we allege.

159.

If Barack Obama is a genius or is a natural born American then he would have known: Mason and Dixons survey resembles the Manhattan Project and the circle they surveyed is equatorial in that you can use it to negate: THE FALSE ILUSION OF IT ALL AS ACTUAL REALITY IS EXTRAORDINARILY DECEPTIVE. At the equator you do not see the curvature of the Earth as you do from NYC as that is an illusion based upon the difference between the two halves of Earth dependent upon where you are standing. The equator is a mean; stand upon the mean and you negate the illusion. Stand upon US law and you negate the false illusion! Personally I go to the Iroquois when I need to know how and why magnetic north moves and to independently confirm if I have resolved Uniformity or not to confirm if I have united relativity and quantum mechanics or not - but the Mason-Dixon line or Thomas Jefferson is every bit as effective and as I am an actual American then I would look in America first. Not in Kenya. Or in Canada. Or in Indonesia. Or in Britain.

160.

AMERICA: #1 IN PARTICLE PHYSICS SINCE JULY 4TH, 1776! France actually believes it has stolen the title or seat of particle physics which couldnt be father from the truth if you tried. France and CERN planned to use its multi-billion dollar particle collider in 2007 so the class had to beat France and CERN into SCOTUS to secure a valid copyright and patent as we know Higgs and his god-particle is incorrect. I entered an article I found in National Geographic claiming the seat of particle physics had moved to France and CERN. It claimed that America had lost this race in the brain department and this loss might be permanent. France: Number 1 In Particle Physics Since Its Failed Revolution, Napoleon and No Resistance To Hitler? A

chemical reaction is produced when you laugh as well as when you act out of ego:

161.

Propaganda, use of force and other forms of intimidation such as emotion dumping is known as fear conditioning. The DSM names it as domestic violence, brain washing and mild brain washing. Its meant to provoke the Pavlovian response in humans thus make you like a dumb animal in a zoo rather than like a liberated human being. A person does not make full use of their amygdale or their pineal gland; a physical injury occurs. Your amygdale must grow larger to compensate. The chemical reaction that occurs upon invoking the Pavlovian response conditions you as if it is a drug and you are an addict. You meet the clinical definition of addict and that pathology is present.

162.

Cradle to the grave state welfare systems in nations like France cause the citizen to become like a dumb animal in a zoo as like ego addicts youre addicted to something too: NOT KNOWING THUS ALWAYS SETTLING; BEING TAKEN CARE OF RATHER THAN ACTING TO CARE FOR YOURSELF ON YOUR OWN. A person born and raised in France with this mentality doesnt know the highs and lows; when they achieve? Its not like when an American achieves thus enters free fall, moving in space as no force is exerted upon an American, while a Frenchman is always subjected to force by the state even if its a silent agreement. Their experience does not match their conclusions as Einstein proved it should. They suffer a like physical injury that an American unlike any other person on Earth can overcome on their own or by their lonesome self. Recall the French protesting violently in defense of: government paid benefits and vacation time? Thats a realization of the injury.

163. Relativity states that objects in free fall move as there is the absence of force in space its a vacuum - so it is not a matter of gravity; for someone

who is French? Theyre subject to gravity where an American isnt. In France you cannot ascend via your lone vote as first youd have to have the vote and then youd have to have the means to wield it elegantly as that exists only here, in the US. Whether they know it or not people who choose physical comforts based upon no other or different life experience so they do not own the knowledge ARE being conditioned by fear as the fear may be conscious or subconscious so they arent experiencing fear as a higher order instinct but only the false illusion realized as shame, blame, humiliation, frustration, etc. etc. They are victims of emotion dumping but may not realize it as they are so comfy.

164. I, Susan, happen to be immune to fear conditioning and to all forms of propaganda; it is partly a unique physical trait or quality of my person and partly that I refused to participate in the delusion: I never once lent my belief to anything but America and US law, I never lied as a lie is meant to deceive and I never once acted to injure or harm another human with deliberation. If it seems as if I have lied or as if I have harmed another? I was forced to do so; I had no other choice so it is self-defense. I am well aware of the difference between self-defense and deliberately acting to harm another; I do not lie to myself as to whether or not I had a choice and I own the knowledge that I control myself not any other person and no other person controls me. The class is composed of independent contractors who are also interdependent simultaneously but this in no way makes for a gang mentality or unbearable, invisible weight that then forces us to act or causes us to fail to act as gravity is not a force but the resultant phenomenon produced by the interaction of natural forces and weight is a counterbalance that can, may and will cause you to rise. We are: actually sovereign. Or so we allege.

165. Not only can and may we act as our own attorneys but US case law is if we are uniquely qualified then we may represent the class; also a voter invoking

the power of Executive Order or a currently sitting federal officer may enter directly w/o any fee or any lower or other court hearing besides SCOTUS. Court fees do not apply most especially in this case as: The named SCOTUS clerks were never going to let anybody, not even a federal judge, in; while we are supposed to enter SCOTUS directly, in person, no SCOTUS clerk was willing to comply with US law or case law in the end thus justice was made impossible from a time before we entered and before Obama was unlawfully installed. If every judge and every clerk is a lawyer who is now a part of a gang mentality that seemingly protects lawyers when in reality it allows overthrow and eradication to occur, and if the 19th Amendment was never honored, may you deny a woman, may you ask her to secure a law degree or may you charge her that fee no matter how large or small it is? How can you value a woman at less than zero one minute and then ask her for $500 the next as if you value her and when Obama sits in diametric opposition to her? You can, as you have the human ability to participate in and succumb to delusion and/or criminal activity but the class will never blindly obey as we have both ability and capacity and we own the truth of US law and this universe:

166.

When The Creator appeared in West Palm Beach, FL and sang to me in the form of a burning bush, Bush V Gore, I, Susan, heard the law at work: Mathematics, geometry, biology, jurisprudence, logic, English, neuroscience, physics etc. I heard common sense and whats obvious or self-evident to the natural born American Revolutionary soul as: the oath of Office is I WILL not MY LAWYER WILL, this case was born into this world as Gore V FL, the order of operations begins with multiplication while subtraction is last not first, these voters do not exist, the caption should yet read Gore V FL not Bush V Gore so BVG is fiction and is a crime thus this makes George Bush Sr. the last king of America. Or so we allege and so I immediately concluded.

167. Experience matching conclusions as Relativity states or dictates? As I am a dead reckoner to me its obvious. An example from classical America would

be: Ben Franklin. Franklin fly his kite to prove via the experience of being shocked that lightning was indeed a form of electricity. He set out to prove his conclusion via experience. In Franklins day the Leyden jar was discovered. The Leyden jar is an early form of the battery. At the time scientists believed the water in the Leyden jar was acting as the capacitor to store electricity. Franklin proved them incorrect and coined the name battery: If you are Franklin it should be self-evident that the glass jar not the water had to be acting as the capacitor or else every time it rained during a thunder and lightning storm the raindrops would be teeny tiny capacitors zapping you and shocking you as they landed upon you discharging stored electricity. It should be obvious as you flew that kite: Water conducts not stores the electrical charge. These seemingly simple connections are lost on most people alive today. I, Susan, had conclusions about US law and the correct application of it and I set out to prove it via my life experience and did exactly like the original Founders.

168.

Lawyers and law schools kept lying to me and claiming that they too knew when they did not. I wrote to the Harvard Law Review years ago. Finally when the Chief clerk said YOU CANNOT and I said, Cant? How would you know? I understood: He believed if he could not then nobody can. Like this: We have zero empirical data but if we cannot ascend then nobody can ascend; its the same thing Sandra Sotomayor said in her black firemen ruling that was unanimously overturned by the Justices. Lawyers had no experience to prove their conclusions; their conclusions match only the real that lawyers live not reality. No lawyer can enter SCOTUS directly. Absolutely refusing to allow me or any person to achieve only as you cannot? Thats a form of force. people. Its also a delusion known as: I can and do control other

169.

Lawyers did not know the simplest, most basic concepts regarding law let alone complex concepts. Lawyers could not and would not admit that they did not own knowledge, that law school is not a secret mystery school and

that law school does not make you better than. Until 2007 I did not know that lawyers were denying the reality of Marbury and the 1871 version of US law and yet petitioning SCOTUS regardless. I had to hear lawyers exactly saying, Marbury is unconstitutional to know that by their reasoning then they are too which is why they deny they are Officers: Denying they are Officers makes it okay for lawyers to claim Marbury is not lawful and yet then access the US courts. Its rationalization and justification; its having sex with your law license not your vote. Its an agreement that you will all act unlawfully as a group and never, ever expose each other for what you actually are be you a Voter or a crook. Lawyers are mostly responsible for Obama, himself a lawyer, as they do not want the illusion that they are allknowing thus all-powerful shattered. They cannot allow anyone to fault them for BVG as once the truth is known? Then lawyers cannot employ tricks to control The People including judges as lawyers have to be equally honest once the illusion is shattered. How deep is the poop lawyers have been shoveling our way since 1871? We call US law a paper chase yet every US lawyer missed it: As an American, a natural born lawyer as my votes makes it so, I expected that if a bush could spontaneously light afire and begin singing it would be made of paper so I was prepared not frightened or angry. How could lawyers miss this piece of paper??? Thats an indicator of the level of injury and harm caused by denying women equality. I understood the story of Moses is symbolic as is US law; see attached written by Ben Franklin regarding what emblems symbols - mean.

170.

Again, as I believe I know something every lawyer doesnt: Bush V Gore is a tie. Its a legal and mathematical question as math is law of this universe. If you check the Greeks fell partly as they had no understanding of zero as a numerical value but only as a philosophical concept. The Hindus understood zero as a number but not philosophically. Americans have an understanding of zero as both and as unique: Our vote is equal to Executive Order so Americans sit at or on zero point not first person and not third person. Marbury v Madison is zero point. A Persian united the two concepts of zero

adding his own unique property; we did the same only as a form of government. Our Founders drew upon what seemed to work adding their own unique ideas or what is unique to America. Like the Persians introduced some of the greatest advancements in math and science? We did the same with government. Thus BVG sat as 1 alone or 5 as 1 versus 4 as 1, or, 1 versus 1 as its about absolutes and wholes as your vote is both a singular plurality and a plural singularity. YOU are to embody the law via reasoning your vote as after SCOTUS or after the President and Commander is The People aka American common law. No matter how you count BVG it is a tie as the Chief Justice castled with Bush Jr. leaving the door open for one voter to rise and I did thus The People did. If you are not A People but are a lawyer or doctor or Billionaire or Senator or Judge instead? You wont rise with us. Its up to you to be A People or not. If your true belief is that you exist above the People or that you are better than The People? The tied opinion will not be so obvious to you as to you its not possible. BVG is always and forever a tie until we address it as injustice does not fade away on its own as unjust governments implode and it never spontaneous but a long time coming as sociologists have ignored what I call the rev up. Scientists believe a single event ignites violence and so genocide but no, as theres a slow rev up or a first cause that is a series of events that then culminates into one event realized in the physical world; the human dynamic in play has been ignored as science mistakenly believes you cant know the human subconscious when you can.

171.

Like this: Electoral college 1, me 1 as its one whole vote for Bush Jr. plus the last elector to vote their conscience was the lone elector who voted for Anderson in 1980 as he saw this constitutional crisis coming. Remember the popular vote was for Gore so its 1 for Gore pitted against the Colleges 1 for Bush Jr. As the electors are purchased by the candidates when they pay the lump sum to then buy a place upon the ballot in each state thus they prove nothing about ability or capacity, as Gore aided and abetted Clinton and as Gore began this fight when he had no case then I pitted my lone 1 against

both the whole vote of The People and the College as what I was effectively voting against is purchase and is the corrupted 2 party system. I was voting against the unjust, dissolving the shadow and so re-constituting The People as our constitutionally set government. By voting for my own self and by ruling in favor of my own self in the form of a vote against Clinton and in the form of a directly entered SCOTUS suit, an answer to or against BVG not against SCOTUS or the Justices, then I acted for The People. Thus its always 1 versus 1: SCOTUS 1, me 1. Class of crooks 1, class of honest People 1. Rehnquist 1, me 1.

172.

If you want me to reach back further I can: Judge who hid the murder weapon used to shoot and kill Medgar Evers before I was even born 1, me as I know what happened and we finally convicted the shooter, Byron De Le Beckwith, 1. The dynamic is fear of the unknown as the balance of power tips so people begin reacting out of fear but in America due to our form we had actors like the guy who voted for Anderson or the lawyer who came forward with the hidden gun. In America you can run but you cant hide; who does not know that Dick Cheney had a baby to dodge the draft then said he is against people who are gay when his own daughter maybe that very baby he used to dodge the draft - claims to be gay? If you do not yet know the lie Cheney is telling you maybe this symbolic reference better illustrates it: Dick Cheney had about 14 heart attacks and is yet alive; why is The Creator keeping him alive? Its not that he has access to better medical care or that he had an early diagnosis. I know as heart disease took out my fathers entire family including he himself. Its that: Cheneys heart is diseased, literally and figuratively. Cheney lusts after power and control not authority. OR SO WE CONCLUDE AS WE EXPERIENCED DICK CHENEY. Watch this:

173.

Cheney sics the FBI on me via illegal use of the Patriot Act while at the library on January 3rd, 2007 but I know so I fill out a detailed internet crime report naming the FBI as the culprits and even cite their misuse of the word WHO? When its a website or an anonymous electronic emission so you

would not ask WHO but WHAT WEBSITE? Or WHAT EVENT? As its the FBIs job to find out WHO as we call that an investigation; I tell the FBI that I will be glad to tell them WHO exactly if they give me a gun, a badge and a paycheck otherwise do what I pay you to do investigate your own agency as somebody tagged me - and then I email it right back to the FBI thus: Dick Cheney 0, me 1 as its FBI 1, me 1 as I noticed their tag and recorded their illegal search and seizure of my intellectual property a part of which happened to be: Republican and Democratic monopoly as the library receives individual, city, county, state and federal funding. All of this is on the official record all of this was documented in detail - and several police and other professional reports exist as I went to every agency in the moment as I knew:

174.

The collusion of public and private at this level and all at once means a cop is going to get killed if I dont act as this then is the culmination of the collusion between military and police powers as the FBI is a police power acting as if they are a military power while Cheney pretends hes in Command; later that day? A cop almost did get killed by a private party but I stopped the bullet as I anticipated it. Its how the injury is realized and how it escalates; its the pathology of the disease. I won or its a tie as I beat the FBI at their own game or I equaled them. If the FBI admits I equaled their so-called experts as I spotted a rotten egg they planted in an email I wrote to then track my movements but I removed it as if I were a professional FBI hacker? Its a tie as the action is unjust but is the agent who did it unjust or is it that he doesnt know something? The legal presumption in re the FBI is its a tie. A TIE IS ALWAYS THROWN TO THE PEOPLE AS A WHOLE OR TO A LONE PEOPLE, ONE LONE VOTER!

175.

Im A People so my vote is equivalent to the President and Commanders as per Marbury so I stand aside or down the Chief Justice and currently sitting Officers. My vote or my opinion carries as much weight or more weight than the Chief Justices if I can meet and then exceed him as all power and

authority belongs to The People: THE PEOPLE CARRY AS MUCH WEIGHT; ALL AUTHORITY BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE. So then:

176.

If William Rehnquist asks me to dance? I will seriously consider the offer. If he dangles a shiny red apple in front of me and waves it around daring me to take a bite? I will not be able to refuse. We are Romantic Liberals, acting in concert and in league. William Rehnquist never told me that I could not eat the apple or that ownership of knowledge was off limits to me alone or to women in general; he would dare me upon a routine basis to take up the argument. Once he signaled me: Who among you did not know what purple beret meant? I knew. Then again I know why he dissented and so argued Brown V Topeka should not be heard: passion went off among the other clerks and he heard it as he was there; he had no choice as you must temper reason with emotion not veer into passion and then when he read the argument he understood: The argument itself is no good but the proof is. His opinion? This was not the argument as we are asking about exactly worded law. William Rehnquist almost never became the Chief Justice as he invoked moral authority his entire career from his very first day as a clerk in SCOTUS as an absolute stranger handed him a pile of cases and said Summarize these when he couldve been an ax murderer for all anybody knew. He never, ever forgot; he himself told me in his book: ITS GOING TO BE A CLERK; LOOK IN THE SCOTUS CLERKS OFFICE. Rehnquist is correct. Or so we allege.

177.

The rest of the planet might have been sound asleep but I was wide awake. I began collecting the answers to the biggest questions on Earth as I am homo sapien Im sapient so I know - thus Ive been working on the answers since July 20th, 1969 as my sense of self is men landing on the moon and as that is the essence of the EP&DP clauses then it leveled the playing field known as the universe. We became creators equivalent but not equal to The Creator we became universal - as nature will always be a force more powerful than we are and man is a part of nature so we cannot defeat nature. We can work with the natural forces not control them and not defeat them. Just or lawful

men & lawful universe works; unjust men & lawful universe does not work as we are a nation of law. To exceed the Chief Justice I would have to bring the answers in with me as the only authority then is me and it must be inside the only three written authorities SCOTUS accepts upon matters of law: The Declaration, The Federalist Papers and The Constitution. US case law IS NOT an authority upon exactly worded matters of law; if it is then you could never overturn precedent. You may ask SCOTUS to call a matter of exactly worded law in order to have the debate and/or conduct the experiment but you may not quote any US case law as exactly worded law but cite it for what it is: case law. In this way you can prove both A Summary View and Marbury are law of this universe but you never want to make Marbury an exactly worded authority upon law or a power greater than the voter is as then you would not be equal to the Chief Justice; a Chief Justice could slaughter you in a war. Marbury like SCOTUS itself is a matter of voluntary compliance; A Summary View? Involuntary compliance as youre born sovereign and sapient. Its human nature or existent law of this universe. You can and may make A Summary View an authority upon matters of law as all it does is level the filed for every sapient creature. Dogs, dolphins and whales etc. etc. are not sapient no matter what lawyers for PETA claim. I, Susan, never planned upon waging and winning a Revolution all by myself and I never planned upon eclipsing George Washington as a military commander but this is America; you may not expect it to happen to you but you can depend upon it asyou volunteer so this stuff is not happening to you; you are deliberately acting to make it happen. My earliest memory, even earlier than the moon landing?

178. I will never, ever, ever be able to claim in any court on Earth that I did not know as that memory is the sacred memory known as the Sundance, the very moment the divine spark was imbued in humans. I remember when Eve acted to pick the apple. Then she acted to eat it. And then Adam acted upon his own volition as Eve did not hold a gun to his head. Eve instituted government on Earth while Adam instituted politics on Earth. Thats symbolic. I not only have had the sacred experience we call the Sundance

but: At age 4 I acted to pick and then acted to eat chocolate pudding after my Creator, Mom, told me NO. I stole pudding. I committed a crime right under my mothers nose. I acted alone; I had no help. Then like Adam and Eve as lawyer is the worlds oldest profession I lied or perjured myself upon a direct line of questioning. My mother told me: Caught! as this crime is uniquely Susan; the proof is not in the pudding but in you as you are American. You are a brand new creature. I am; we are: Homo Americanus. Or so we allege.

179.

American Steven Breyer when standing down an actual corpse wouldnt know to go to Marbury, Blackwells (or is it Blackstones?) and then A Summary View as Blackwells in intrinsic to Marbury and then The Iroquois Confederacy as white male protestants have been denying the reality of it; scientists, lawyers and politicians deliberately set out to eradicate it to eradicate the truth as the Confederacy is older than the Magna Carta. By white male protestants I mean actual white, male protestants and organized institutions that act exclusionary or act upon prejudice thus are elitist. I (we) do not mean Steven Breyer himself or any one Justice or even any one lawyer involved in that case. Law school wrongly teaches lawyers that they cant, that it is humanly impossible to challenge Marbury, that you must exert overblown ego if you act as a lawyer and that we resort to British common law upon exhausting our resources. No, as you never, ever exhausted over half of your resources: Women. You have never applied the EP&DP clauses in actual reality and you have never lived out your own unique form of government yet. It makes little or no sense that you would resort to British common law as if it worked and if it was a just, elegant model then no king would exist; George III would never have been. British law was never codified into written form or so I have been told; US law is codified. In Britain they can merely claim law is when it is not and nobody can know as they cannot look it up; in Britain they do not have informed consent as a right or in actuality yet. Who is driven to promote the Magna Carta at the expense of what is uniquely American? The unjust, namely those

in power already or those who are criminally corrupted and/or of diminished capacity so they are not able unless the field is unlevel. Or so we allege.

180. The Magna Carta is your father; it was turned into the Mayflower Compact and it protects the aristocracy or oligarchy. The Confederacy is your mother; it protects The People. Franklins Albany Plan of Union, anyone? I would know as I am not only natural born but native; I was raised on the Great Iroquois Nation. All I know thus all I am is American. The Confederacy is uniquely American as it names The Creator and it contains elegant checks and balancesthe division of powers creates the correct application of the EP&DP clauses automatically if you live it out as they account for both man and woman, a biological distinction. Race is not such a distinction. I am an actual expert and actual authority:

181.

Kurt Vonneguts basement in Cohoes is not only on a street named Kosciusko but is also on the Cohoes Falls. I went to high school in that basement as the cafeteria and my biology class was in it. My school motto? Faith and knowledge. Cohoes Falls is one of the most sacred places on Earth. Hiawatha met Deganawidah here when he was moved by actual human grief. They then traveled among the tribes that became The Confederacy, ending cannibalism, uniting the tribes and reciting what we know of as The Iroquois Constitution. This model of government is unique. The Iroquois have recited it verbatim and passed it down from person to person or as originally given to them for over 800 years. Eventually they write it down on paper, verbatim or exactly. The Iroquois can date their form by an eclipse that science has confirmed did occur when the Iroquois say it did. When Europeans came here they were exposed to the Confederacy; Natives met with our Founders. Via direct contact and idea diffusion how ideas spread from person to person as they enter our conscious awareness the people who became the American Founders then had all of world history and what is uniquely American to draw upon when they created the US. Jefferson, in A Summary

View, equated allodial title which is a land claim based upon a royal grant that is itself based upon papal grant that then is based upon a divine right aka The Creator to: the sovereignty of man over the Earth. Sovereignty is. Correct exactly as rights are; an actual right exists independent of any piece of paper as it came into being with this universe as it is law of this universe. Those same laws rule man. Common to the US and the Iroquois is The Creator as both claims are derived directly from A Creator and so our very creation itself.

182.

Jefferson was seemingly unsure of himself when it came to publishing A Summary View. Not true as this legal claim is Jeffersons sense of self; it is a physical manifestation of who and what Jefferson is The very thing that drove Jefferson, his sense of self which he too recalled, was turned into a legal, scientific and theological argument. For Jefferson to publish it meant he would be taking a risk that could be fatal if A Summary View was trashed as it would constitute an annihilation of self. Jefferson was not approval seeking when he first showed A Summary View to George Merton, his tutor. He was testing the water. When Merton enthusiastically supported A Summary View then Jefferson published it and it became a hit in Great Britain first as Jefferson was arguing a human had the divine right so any man could level a king. Its a simple fact of my life: Only man possesses emotional reasoning capacity; man is sovereign over the Earth and men? Men are not made perfect while women are made defective and men are not stronger as Darwin is incorrect when it comes to survival of the fittest among other theories he had; US law is about the physical, emotional and metaphysical reality we live and that is universal reality so it is the third dimension that will trip unjust men up as they cannot cross the Rubicon. John Adams said, We have crossed the Rubicon. In America and in this universe those who survive are not physically strong but emotionally strong as I can level physical strength with a gun. And of those who are emotionally strong? Its the metaphysically fit who win the day as your brain is not your mind; brain

and mind or the human conscience are two different things. Its metaphysical reality that then connects body and soul.

183. To prove this (sovereignty) is law you need to author a theory based upon your observations and then predict the behavior of nature; you predict something that we do not yet know and if nature transpires as you predict? Then that is absolute proof: your theory is a law. Once you know the law the problem becomes human perception as people view results through a filter of belief systems based upon your sense of self and your upbringing or socialization. You must account for your sense of self and negate your personal beliefs by negating socialization and for me this is easy as my personal beliefs ARE universal as they ARE the 3 written authorities SCOTUS accepts on matters of law. All of my personal beliefs match US & universal law. Negating socialization is difficult as that began in Eden and currently there is no escape on Earth as nobody lives what is universal law. You must negate: your greatest fear, and so that is the great accomplishment of my life as to conquer this fear means you have conquered death in actual reality.

184. Fear experienced as an emotion and physical sensation is not actual reality but is the skewing of a humans emotional compass that began in Eden; nature is fear and guilt should be experienced as higher order instinct not emotions such as shame and humiliation. Your emotional compass is skewed so your perception of reality is skewed. The false appearance and false impression deceives you. I, Susan, do not experience fear and guilt as anything but an instinct and never did. My compass is set due North and always was due to my unique facts. Therefore to conquer death is not to conquer your fear of death but your greatest fear that is some how, some way related to death. When people tell you that they have conquered fear so they are not afraid of death? YES THEY ARE. They have not conquered actual death but only defied the physical and emotional injury; they have not defied

the metaphysical injury as to do that you must experience the Living Death named in Christianity by Jesus and based upon results I may be the only person to do since Jesus.

185. A so-called near death experience gives you proof that another world exists beyond the physical and emotional world you have been living within; it of and by itself is not the Living Death and the Living Death is not the same as Enlightenment. The Living Death is a state of being that exists beyond Enlightenment and is to be had within US law. Its: Brotherly love. To conquer your greatest fear you must experience actual fear, guilt, grief and liberty; you must negate your subconscious mind by going to the deepest recesses of your psyche thus conquering death as you return to the living or you are not catatonic nor is your physical body lifeless. You conquer what Augustine refers to as original sin. You own actual wisdom. Then you are no longer seeing through a glass darkly.

186.

I, Susan Herbert, see through the glass very clearly: I have been arguing US law and case law my entire life. I was born into this world as a legal prodigy and into a family that understood the invocation of constitutionally, enumerated, protected rights is active as is disobeyance and defiance. We do not recognize legal prodigies as its not like youll pay $100 to watch a legal prodigy play The Constitution as if he or she is a rock star and as adults become incredibly uncomfortable in the presence of any child with actual power and actual moral authority aka a keen sense of justice that they then act upon. Thats because US law facilitates the healing process and most adults are lying to themselves and they do not want their illusions and delusions shattered. I authored my theory and when nature transpired as I said it would I was proven. Then I authored THE theory regarding US law and Uniformity as magnetic north will be my proof. When magnetic north behaves as I claim it will US law will be proven absolutely. US law and our form is no longer theory but law of this universe.

187.

I have no idea who raised every other American or Catholic on Earth but nobody in my world was allowed to rationalize and justify their actions and nobody would use force as you cannot force another person to God anymore than you can guilt them. I have never heard of fearing God acting only as you are afraid of God not because it is actually just - and it is wholly irrational. I have absolutely no idea what others mean when they say Im afraid or Catholic guilt as that never happened to me in my world. It might be partly due to the fact that I was taught Baltimore Catechism which most resembles US law. Mortal and venal sins? High crimes and misdemeanors. College of cardinals? The Electoral College. Red, white and blue? Baptism of blood, intention and water. Americans are supposed to challenge the establishment even if it is Lord Calvert, the Royal Astronomers and the Vatican. The Voters are supposed to check the Officers, even the President legal or not. The class prepared for every and any court.

188. I do not recall a time in my life when I did not know that I am a sovereign entity unto myself, sovereign over the issue and jurisdiction known as my person, and I vividly recall the exact time and place I was taught to swear out an invocation of my rights. Jesse Johnson has a vivid memory from his childhood too so he knew American. I, Susan, have not ever engaged in a grudge match nor have I failed to act not even in the face of mortal danger. Susan Clemons never fails to act. Ray M. never fails; Kurt Kallenbach? He conducted a one march for liberty. Tackling the Chinese Communists and winning even on their own field was never not possible for us. The class has faith; the class believes its all possible. We took our Founders at their exact word. We worked different not harder; we: Endeavored. We discovered not invented the truth. I am; we are. [Since this writing Jesse Johnson passed away so he never had his day in court as his right was denied him; however, Rich P., Pryce P. and Brian D. were present with me when we convened the government and when Jesse gave me his intellectual property; like Jefferson we are not entering his corpse but his genius.]

189. Being? By my nature as a human being then makes me reasonable as I came into this world with emotional reasoning capacity unlike the other animals and unlike the other citizens of other nations as Im not only sapient but American. Acting? By my nature as an American acting then becomes the cause. The People are the reason while I am the cause as law is reciprocal so this then benefits me automatically as what I am is A People, a lone one and then a whole one. As no man can ever disjoin this from me or separate me from it or make it apart from myself and as my sense of self or essence IS this divine spark then what you will have to do is murder me and even in death I am making homicide an impermanent solution at best. Genocide never works or so we allege.

190. It is the height of delusion and egomania to tell another American you may never exert or invoke moral authority in the federal court again or you will be killed. Obama ordered me to: Lie to the federal judiciary thus The People. He ordered me to commit a crime! Nobody on Earth can force another person to commit a crime. What Obama cannot do is make his own motive and intent then my motive and intent. Obamas motive and intent is not the same as anybody elses. His metaphysical reality is his own. The truth is: I was laughing and the person in front of me began screaming, YOU NEED TO BE AFRAID! WHY ARENT YOU AFRAID?! Because: In actual reality fear is not a quality of my person. Its not by my very nature as a human and as an American. Fear the way cowards experience it? Thats unconscionable. Literally, it means that person is devoid of a conscience.

191. Every person lives a unique life and so has expert knowledge. The unique gift I possess? I listen different not differently but exactly different unique making me the case that now defies the medical textbooks as well as the legal ones as my hearing is wired unlike yours, I am using a previously

unused area of our brain and the divider that separates the left and right halves of your brain much like the divider that exists between hard drives on a computer no longer is within me as it is perfectly centered so that now I use my whole brain at once. According to the medical lawyers we call medical doctors? Susan Herbert has uniquely balanced her person via her means which happens to be a universal mean to then perfectly counterbalance the difference in male and female biology. Male and female is no more; woman is but female is not as woman is the human quality.

192.

In March 2010 I discovered that I am actually hearing this world differently. I not only hear beyond the normal spectrum for humans but I do not process tone as you do; I do not hear tone in my left ear thus the difference between thinking in absolutes versus wholes is negated. I see, hear, and feel both when dealing with any problem thus I can dead reckon law in any field. Dead reckoners in any profession need no instrumentation but use only their own person. I am immune to propaganda in any form and immune to the intrinsic lies you tell about who and what you are no matter how well you craft the illusion so I cannot and will not participate in the delusion. I have united polymathy into one whole body of knowledge thus each lone body of genius is fully incorporated into the whole and a brand new creature arose from the antediluvian, primordial sludge named the post1871 DC Corporate Trust (yes, thats a cause of the first cause joke as that argument is actually futile):

193. I, Susan Herbert, am transfigured by US law. Humans unlike any other animal genetically encode learning thus pass it on generationally so that every new human born does not have to be taught knowledge. In the animal kingdom every baby animal must be re-taught knowledge. In myself and in the class? Voting seems to have been genetically encoded within us; we seem to have a genetic disposition for voting and all things related to liberty. We are honest. It also seems to be the result of the suppression of our ego so it is

balanced with id and/or so the chemical reaction, experienced exactly like a drug addiction, happening when you act to feed ego is not happening in us. You may also want to look up epigenomes which humans produce as they suppress some traits while allowing others to exert themselves. This is about our capacity; our ability increased until our capacity increased to accommodate it. I myself entered the science (my own findings) but organized science has now caught up to me:

Scientists discover moral compass in the brain which can be controlled by magnets MARCH 2010 [Note what "science" conveniently forgets all of a sudden? THAT YOUR RIGHT BRAIN IS FEMALE NOT MALE.] By David Derbyshire Last updated at 11:52 AM on 30th March 2010

The moral compass, technically named the right temporo-parietal junction, lies just behind the right ear in the brain

Scientists have discovered a real-life 'moral compass' in the brain that controls how we judge other people's behaviour. The region, which lies just behind the right ear, becomes more active when we think about other people's misdemeanours or good works.

In an extraordinary experiment, researchers were able to use powerful magnets to disrupt this area of the brain and make people temporarily less moral.The study highlights how our sense of right and wrong isn't just based on upbringing, religion or philosophy - but by the biology of our brains.

Dr Liane Young, who led the study, said: 'You think of morality as being a really highlevel behaviour. To be able to apply a magnetic field to a specific brain region and change people's moral judgements is really astonishing.'

The moral compass lies in a part of the brain called the right temporo-parietal junction. It lies near the surface of the brain, just behind the right ear. [MY EARS & TONE!]

The researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology used a non-invasive technique called transcranial magnetic stimulation to disrupt the area of the brain.The technique generates a magnetic field on a small part of the skull which creates weak electric currents in the brain. These currents interfere with nearby brain cells and prevent them from firing normally.

In the first experiment, 12 volunteers were exposed to the magnetic field for 25 minutes before they were given a series of 'moral maze' style scenarios.

For each of the 192 scenarios, they were asked to make a judgement about the character's actions on a scale of 1 for 'absolutely forbidden' to 7 for 'absolutely permissible'.

In the second experiment, the magnetic field was applied to their heads at the time they were asked to weigh up the behaviour of the characters in the scenario.

In both experiments, the magnetic field made the volunteers less moral.

One scenario described a man who let his girlfriend walk over a bridge he knew was unsafe. The girl survived unharmed.

Under normal conditions, most people rate the man's behaviour as unacceptable. But after getting the magnetic pulse, the volunteers tended to see nothing wrong with his actions - and judged his behaviour purely on whether his girlfriend survived. Another scenario described two girls visiting a chemical plant where one girl asks her friend to put sugar in her coffee. The friend uses powder from a jar marked 'toxic' - but as the powder turns out to be sugar, the girls if unharmed.Volunteers with a disrupted moral compass tended to rate the girl's behaviour as permissible because her friend was not injured - even though she was aware the powder came from a jar labelled toxic.

Throughout the experiment, irresponsible or deliberate actions that might have resulted in harm were seen as morally acceptable if the story had a 'happy ending', they reported in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[HENCE THEY USE PROPAGANDA TO MAKE YOU FEEL GOOD SO YOU BELIEVE IT IS 'GOOD'. I'M IMMUNE. IT'S NOT ANTI-BIOTICS. It's: CONSTITUTION.]

It's not the first time that scientists have found parts of the brain that specialise in ethics and morality. Last year American scientists claimed to have found a "god spot" a region of the brain that controls religious belief.

[NOW THEY ARE CLAIMING THAT THIS JUNCTION THEN FIRES UP SEVERAL DIFFERENT AREAS OF YOUR BRAIN. IT'S INTERCONNECTED. TRUE BUT THERE'S NO SHORTCUT YOU CAN TAKE! You cannot tape magnets to yourself or zap your brain with a powerful magnet to heal the injury. Organized science is also discovering something else I know: The electromagnetic force is involved in recovered memory, as you can effect memory with this force. If you ask me why my memory is so long and so good? I never once vested any of my power and authority in any outside thing so never came to experience fear or guilt as anything other than higher order human instinct. The way you feel afraid? I never have that feeling; the pleasure you feel when you deceive another and profit? I never have that feeling. I have never had that experience of life known as harming another with motive and intent. I never erased who and what I am according to The Creator.]

Belief and the brain's 'God spot'

Scientists say they have located the parts of the brain that control religious faith. And the research proves, they contend, that belief in a higher power is an evolutionary asset that helps human survival. Steve Connor reports Tuesday, 10 March 2009

A belief in God is deeply embedded in the human brain, which is programmed for religious experiences, according to a study that analyses why religion is a universal human feature that has encompassed all cultures throughout history.

Scientists searching for the neural "God spot", which is supposed to control religious belief, believe that there is not just one but several areas of the brain that form the biological foundations of religious belief.

The researchers said their findings support the idea that the brain has evolved to be sensitive to any form of belief that improves the chances of survival, which could explain why a belief in God and the supernatural became so widespread in human evolutionary history.

"Religious belief and behaviour are a hallmark of human life, with no accepted animal equivalent, and found in all cultures," said Professor Jordan Grafman, from the US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke in Bethesda, near Washington. "Our results are unique in demonstrating that specific components of religious belief are mediated by well-known brain networks, and they support contemporary psychological theories that ground religious belief within evolutionary-adaptive cognitive functions."

Scientists are divided on whether religious belief has a biological basis. Some evolutionary theorists have suggested that Darwinian natural selection may have put a premium on individuals if they were able to use religious belief to survive hardships that may have overwhelmed those with no religious convictions. Others have suggested that religious belief is a side effect of a wider trait in the human brain to search for coherent beliefs about the outside world. Religion and the belief in God, they argue, are just a manifestation of this intrinsic, biological phenomenon that makes the human brain so intelligent and adaptable.

The latest study, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, involved analysing the brains of volunteers, who had been asked to think about religious and moral problems and questions. For the analysis, the researchers used a functional magnetic-resonance imaging machine, which can identify the most energetically-active regions of the brain.

You can see then why the Americans with our right to express our ideas about The Creator and our right to form our own opinions and then express them would have the edge when it comes to the evolutionary process, cant you? This spot is all throughout your brain and what lights it and so genius up? LIBERTY an emotion as human emotion itself has an electromagnetic

quality to it which is why emotion dumping, a mild form of brain washing and that is domestic violence is so effective on humans. It changes your reality by changing your emotional reality until you are operating as if machines upon unconditional pride and conditional love exactly like the Nazis. When you hear lawyers referred to as reptiles? This is why as if you ping the Pavlovian response in people enough times then you snuff out your divine spark, your human spark, and your mammalian spark until you are acting like an indiscriminate reptile. Both the victim and the victimizer suffer as the victimizer is harming his own self each time he uses the tactics we label psychological warfare; law school teaches students the tactics but does not teach lawyers the neuroscience and the resultant outcome for anyone who employs these tactics but instead teaches you that you can control others and you can cause harm and yet escape from any and all consequences. To escape from the consequences of what is law? You would need to escape this universe and that will not happen until this universe ceases to exist.

194. It is evolution but Darwin is incorrect as a part of evolution is choice as we individually and collectively value some attributes and qualities but not others. Americans value liberty; liberty is the endowment, liberty is our cause and liberty is our redemption. Liberty is our salvation making other people the salvation history of me. The salvation of America rests within its People as people not things live history and so are history. History does not repeat itself as people repeat themselves thus perfecting themselves as they are forged and tempered in the flames of liberty. But we are not passive participants who are bent and broken against our will as we are volunteers and we are knowing, willful and deliberate. We are not forced by conditions and circumstances beyond our control but instead we possess motive and intent thus every action is an act both purposeful and meaningful. The People who are the Constitution, the class and the exactly named members of this class, do not place blame and we find fault only with ourselves as we know as absolute fact if we are guilty or not thus no piece of paper or outside thing makes us guilty anymore than it makes us innocent. You know what

else ego realized as paper does or does not make us? Right as righteous is a metaphysical point in space not a geophysical direction, not a state of perfection and not one side of your body as if it happened as we did it? The verdict is automatically GUILTY AS CHARGED as our charge is guilty of volunteering thus actively participating in the deliberate creation of the emotion known as liberty that is then actualized as the physical and metaphysical constructs we call justice as The People interact producing the resultant, self-evident phenomenon named safety.

195. Safety is our right, our enumerated protected right. Its the spirit of the law. The Declaration is the spirit of the law while The Constitution is the letter of the law; safety is named in The Declaration which is why lawyers cannot argue it: they are dependent and co-dependent. A lawyer places his power and authority in outside things like his license, a reward (the Nobel Prize is no longer an award but a reward) or his professional degree such as a PhD. Now it will sound as if we are beginning again as it has throughout this complaint but there is no way to avoid this overlap on paper:

196. The class known as The Proof of Life Cases objects to over 60,000,000 voters and then 6 billion humans on Earth who claim to be helpless, hapless victims and/or innocent bystander victimizers and who claim they did not know then and do not know now nor will they ever learn as they cant when in reality they can but will not. These unjust people have displayed a reckless disregard for life, their own first and then ours, and they have steadfastly refused to do anything differently thus they expect different or better results when that is not possible if they do nothing differently. Life increases exponentially; you cannot possibly increase your storehouse as an individual or in your legal capacity if you fail to meet the bar and then plot to land beneath it on purpose as the law of this universe does not work this way. Actual law? Law of this universe dictates, forces, proscribes, states, or provides terms that are non-negotiable as a law is unconditional; to change

what is the law? You would need to travel to another universe. These people want us to believe that they cant effect change in their own lives let alone ours when obviously they are inflicting incalculable injury and harm upon us by denying actual reality: THEY VOTED FOR INJURY AND HARM.

197. These unjust people believe that paper is the absolute proof, that paper is alive and that paper is the law. They now create and destroy paper to then turn a lie into the truth and turn the truth into a lie when it is not possible to destroy the truth and/or prevent the truth from being revealed. The universe will exert itself and be known one way or another. Nature is not selfdefeating and neither is man. Your subconscious mind will express itself no matter what you do to defeat it. Paper of and by itself is never THE law unless you are talking about its qualities and how it came into being as physically real. Paper itself is an actual physical two dimensional object; its physically real once you create it. The words on the paper might match universal law, actual reality, but then again they might not. Your piece of paper may never be emotionally and metaphysically true.

198. These unjust people are now wall papering the planet with dramatic legal garbage. Its constitutional, scientific and theological poppycock. Its politicized. They expect us to believe that they are forced to follow along and that invisible cosmic glue prevents them from being able to act. They expect us to believe we declared our dependence and co-dependence not our independence in 1776 and that co-dependence is our unchangeable nature when it is not. They expect us to become delusional and to succumb to delusion as they go here over and over and over. One of the most recent forms of delusion the class has experienced?

199.

Recently lawyers went so far as to enter an actual corpse as the petitioner to SCOTUS and we noticed. Lawyers are delusional then. If its The People, The

Petitioner Versus Other People, The Respondent can a corpse then press a case? How do you even have a case without a living victim aka a living witness? Since when do you protect the rights of the corpse not the living? How much more proof do you, the unjust, need to know that as a body of government you are actually dead? It is absolutely delusional to believe that you are anything but DOA as a form of government when you enter BVG, Obama and then an actual corpse. Ask Steven Breyer: BVG & Obama are the walking dead. The is it suicide or homicide or what does the death certificate say? case, The Body, is an actual corpse that entered SCOTUS Dead On Arrival.

200. I will tell the Court a SCOTUS joke I created so that The Class could see how insane the voters the Officers or they themselves - are:

Note to future generations: How do you as a body of government and law know that you have died? A federal vampire may not enter your home unless you invite him inside. Federal vampires do not arrive at your home to partake of tea and cookies; they mean and intend to search you not your physical house. If a federal agent asks to come in when he has no rational basis? Just say NO! When the day dawns whereby you receive better legal advice from Bram Stokers Dracula that you do from SCOTUS then you know you have already died. You know as absolute fact that you are dead.

201. The class is alive we are not corpses and the class is not dogma as every one of us is proven absolutely. We have been tested and we have tested ourselves. We have conducted years and years of research and development. WE voluntarily complied so we own the knowledge: The People is the constitutionally set government so even if the ink fades and the paper turns to dust and even if the courthouse crumbles we will still be voting, opining, congressing, praying and petitioning away as actual Americans need

no institutions. I spent the last four years of my life enforcing an Executive Order that I issued and entered directly and so the class and I know as absolute fact: The institutions are handy but you do not need them; in 1776? Organized law school and the ABA did not exist.

202.

Unjust men do not believe The People ARE The Constitution or that The People ARE the constitutionally set government. The now broken DC Trust insists that pen sets, paper, suits and gavels all disembodied and all floating around magically are alive and are the government. Unjust men mostly all lawyers are personifying institutions as if they, the dead institutions, ARE alive. According to the Officers they the US government that is the guilty culprit but when you ask for a name you get: federal code when we call it code as its not law and no Founder wrote it; code is not alive anymore than a rock is alive. If I throw a federal rock not any old rock through the window in this house of glass the sitting Officers have built will they then wake up to reality? How about a legal sized rock, a rock that is 8 and by 14? Obviously these unjust men are devotees of The Sophists, The Materialists including the Supply and Demand Capitalist Model and Niels Bohr not The Signers as Niels Bohr personified photons in his Copenhagen Model and unjust men believe it. Its self-evident: These men actually blindly believe anything you dictate to them as long as you make it sound great so it then feels good; these men are approval seekers and people pleasers. These men do worship graven images. They do thrive upon flattery.

203.

Justice Joseph Story has some history to tell you: Republics are created by the virtue, public spirit, and intelligence of the citizens. They fall, when the wise are banished from the public councils, because they dare to be honest, and the profligate are rewarded, because they flatter the people in order to betray them.

204.

Also: Be brief, be pointed, let your matter stand lucid in order, solid and at hand; spend not your words on trifles but condense; strike with the mass of thought, not drops of sense; press to the close with vigor, once begun, and leave - how hard the task. Hard, nearly impossible on paper as you can never, ever know the emotional and metaphysical truth of liberty via experiencing paper not people only which is why you hear cases in person and as you cannot confine the truth of multidimensional space or the nature of time itself to flat, 2 dimensional pieces of paper. Wisdom? You gain it via having the experience in actual reality. Paper alone never confers wisdom upon a person. If it were that simple? Anybody who ever read US law would be the living embodiment of the Oracle of Delphi, Jesus and The Signers all rolled into one.

205.

US law names only 2 qualifications: Natural born and age 35; # 3, both Executives may not be from the same state, is a made up qualifier meant to force you to vote for a party not your conscience, or, to avoid a split vote in the Electoral College. In the case of BVG the fight would have moved to TX as Dick Cheney was a resident of Texas not Wyoming. Cheney merely lived in Wyoming at one point; even if he owned a home there LEGALLY he was a resident of TX and the class knew it. Therefore the TX Electors may not vote for both Bush Jr. and Cheney but only one of them so unjust power mongers realized in a hurry if you made it so that both people on the ticket were from different states you could strip or rob people of power and authority by enforcing a two party monopoly; also the rules for Electors varying from state to state; they are inconsistent and incongruent so unjust.

206.

Unjust men want us to become dead like they are not to embody the law via our conscience and so our personhood. Einstein? He was not a physicist when he entered Relativity to scientific journals. He worked as a patent clerk as he couldnt get a job in physics in Europe. Thats probably why he came to America as he could get a job in physics here. Jefferson? He never went to law school; he was working as a farmer when he was conscripted and then

he wrote The Declaration. You can believe Thomas Jefferson when he says he is a farmer and that he never wanted to have a career in politics. When he wrote A Summary View? Jefferson was not old enough to act as the Executive when he wrote both A Summary View and The Declaration. When he purchased the LA Territory he was old enough. But still, he was not a lawyer. He mapped LA out too and he was not a cartographer or a surveyor. To this very day we still use Jeffersons elegant magic square East-West map grid. Unjust men think that they can make up the terms and make up the qualifications and then inflict this garbage on us. They think they can dictate what life experiences we must possess therefore dictate what life we must live as if we are drones. They actually believe we are here to serve them as their slaves, as if we are dumb animals in a zoo. Unjust people masquerading as Americans, experts and authorities are bound and determined that they can aspire to death and yet live and that some trick they can play or some piece of paper that they secure will then allow them to avoid all judgment, that they can force us to be defective, when actual reality is Thomas Jefferson yet survives and he, as my client and a member of the class who is fundamentally responsible for Marbury V Madison, has some bad news for the unjust wherever they are and whoever they might be:

207. Reality? The clock began ticking in 1774 and stopped ticking over 180 years ago as if you travel to Monticello you will find a clock that Jefferson built which he measured incorrectly so that in order for the weight to drop he had to cut a hole in the floor. The only pro-active not pre-emptive legal strike in American history then belongs to Jefferson. Jefferson did not measure it incorrectly; it only seems as if. This is because Thomas Jefferson did not know that he, as he remained within Isaac Newtons given parameters when devising a system of weights and measures to then devise an elegant currency, measured and weighed the Earth correctly not Lord Calvert as the correct difference Newton names in Principia that Newton correctly reasons a mountain will not yield is the difference Jefferson discerned and that is the seeming mistake he made measuring that clock. Thomas Jefferson

accounted for the actual nature of time about 100 years before Einstein lived. Thomas Jefferson was challenging Isaac Newton first as he had the correct model and correct mean not Lord Calvert.

208. Einstein would successfully overturn something we mistakenly believed for about 400 years but Jefferson first thought in this direction. When the weight hit the floor time stood still as that clock stopped ticking. Thats symbolic: In actual reality all time now or whole time is then no time. Linear time as we know it is not the actual science but is only scientific as it is based upon the rotation of the planets. Linear time is a lie we agree to believe and that then allows us to value people as money as we can measure a persons worth by how many hours he works NOT by the content of his character or the qualities he is by his nature; we measure worth in phony, artificial, manufactured, arbitrary dollar amounts when the dollar or fiat bill debt money system is anti-constitutional. Who believes it when the privately owned Federal Reserve announces that magically, it will adjust rates to spur economic growth manipulate and control you into working more so you go into debt more when you will never ever have the energy required to pay off that fabricated debt (that amount of energy does not exist in this universe) and so your life is awarded to a CEO while Congress prints more and more paper to cover the nonexistent amount of energy - as if Alan Greenspan just got a clue so he is no longer advocating numbers have motive and intent? The Nobel Prize committee blindly believes it. Or so we allege.

209. Linear time is not meant to deceive you; its a handy reference point but you are supposed to know it is only scientific and that is why the Pope could go from the Julian calendar to the Gregorian calendar or how we use regular time versus daylight savings time or that Britains royal family uses Sandringham time. You are supposed to know about Greenwich mean time and that Jeffersons birthday changed in his lifetime as Gregorian time made his birthday different by two weeks so his gravestone reads O.T. for old time. Did anybodys birthday actually change? Was Jefferson suddenly

born two weeks earlier or later? What did he do, jump back into his mothers womb? As we fine tune the science we fine tune how we keep time. Whole time not linear time is how we first kept time on Earth.

210. Unfortunately linear time worked so well on some fronts

- charting long

ocean voyages on a global map is one example - that it then caused criminals to want to eradicate indigenous whole time calendars. The paper money system based upon linear time is meant to deceive you and was inserted into US law largely with the election of Woodrow Wilson as it was a three way tie, Wilson publicly stated that he believed in Parliament thus a class system not US law, the income tax was going to be made law as the Officers planned to ignore the SCOTUS ruling for personal gain which is why they went along with Wilsons election (in a debt money or supply and demand model you forever owe the ruling class or the sitting Officers) and as all 3 platforms were crafted by the same European banker; paper money along with or inside of a supply and demand model which US law is not, provides for nothing but a giant money laundering operation as human beings are sold. It creates a nation of profiteers, the profit being for personal gain alone. Or so we allege.

211. Currently you are not living what our Founders wrote nor is Ayn Rands objectivism then American selfless service and unlimited opportunity as Rands form of capitalism demands that you are an atheist thus it is perfectly acceptable to cause injury and harm; you end up objectifying people. Man becomes superman, a force more powerful than nature itself! Paper money by itself is not the problem; it is if you combine it with the supply and demand model as energy is free. But at cost. That is, while we currently charge for energy we are acting in violation of universal law as liberty is a form of energy as is time and man cracked free energy long, long ago but the Officers have deliberately suppressed this technology. There is no provision in US law for charging for energy as an arbitrary dollar amount but

only for just compensation; in US law energy produced by man is equated to intellectual property in Article 1 Section 8. Under US law you may not trade US law, The People, upon money. Its at cost as liberty is yours to claim. Its free or without price but we pay the cost. Its just taxation not fantasy taxation. Or so we allege.

212.

A clue: Libertarians now call themselves Libertines. Libertines are French delusional lunatics. Libertarians are American delusional lunatics. Another clue: you cannot tell Sophist Ron Paul that he is in error when it comes to a silver and gold based currency as that too is a supply and demand model as the value of gold is mostly arbitrary, and how we mine gold has changed as has our need as we now use it differently. Silver and gold once was a global standard but never a universal one and any currency that is attached to any outside value is then inherently unjust. It places your power and authority outside of yourself and makes the paper or the metal your god. Jefferson knew this as did other Founders. Thus the process known as amendment exists so make amends to yourselves: Gold would be US law and silver would be US case law based upon a universal standard or mean which I and class member Ray M. have; we have the actual science as he is the person who resolved Uniformity independently of me and who has the universal mean written out in the formal language known as physics thus numerical value; he found me via my strategic military plan: A directly entered SCOTUS suit. Ray M. independently confirms Jeffersons work and my own work as well as the Founders work. He too is a Romantic Liberal. Or so I, Susan Herbert, allege.

213.

Physically The People then, as the original jurisdiction seats remained empty since Wilsons election, were sold to old money banking families and anybody willing to become a criminal on their behalf; physically this was then cemented in place with FDRs ceding of the US Treasury, The People, to the IMF/UN which constitutes a pyramid scheme. It takes that form.

Emotionally The People were broken by the violence of the civil rights era, the drug use of the 60s and by Richard Nixons, Dick Cheneys and Donald Rumsfelds actions or so we believe; metaphysically? When Jefferson due to his sense of self, towering pine trees or his id and being carried on a pillow or his ego, was not able to see that he had the correct difference as he successfully proved A Summary View something already obvious or selfevident to Jefferson as his person then bled to the edges of Earth his actual or true sense of self, his nature was as big or bigger than Earth - cut a hole in his floor he then went into the negative so this negative time differential accrued and accounted for me 180 years to the day he and Adams died as time is conscious; it has mass or capacity. I, Susan Herbert, never lost hope; my faith was never shaken or broken. Metaphysically we are actually born and we never died as I kept the body alive and then I proved it with actual science. How do you know what to believe in if you never complied with US law to begin with and never absolutely proved it or disproved it? CONGRESS, EGOMANIACS, THE FOR PROFIT and LAWYERS can, will and do believe anythingwhat rational basis? Forget reasonable basis as the named respondents have no rational basis.

214. Perfectly logical is usually not logical at all. Logic is not dependent upon conditions as you define terms. Logic is not to be of your own manufacturing. Human ration is emotional reasoning capacity not rationalization. No logic? No reasonable or rational basis. Human ration is not rationalization but having a reasonable and rational basis and applying emotional reasoning capacity. You are supposed to have reason and ration all of the time. So much for Nobel Prizes.

215.

Most Americans do not know: Hugh Everett was in college when he believed he may have stumbled upon an answer that had eluded us. He too was thinking in a different direction as he began to think about infinite possibilities leading to infinite eventualities in a multiverse or multidimensional space. He began to consider that past and future is a

very deceptive illusion only and his work was in conflict with Bohrs. Was he correct? Hugh Everett had an opportunity to HEAR Bohr speak in person not merely read his words on paper; when he heard Bohr in person he knew that he, Everett, was correct and that Bohr was incorrect. Its self-evident: Bohr is intrinsically, fatally flawed. Hugh Everett understood that these ego-driven men are all about awards and credit so he went to Bohr in person and told him what he had discovered and that he would be publishing it. He also went to Bohr in person as he believed he should warn Bohr as in it was righteous as Bohr was not wrong but in error. Niels Bohr knew Hugh Everett had disproved him and that Everett was correct but he told Everett that he was never going to admit this and that he would deny Everett, fully knowing he would destroy Everetts life. In that moment Bohr became wrong hence for all of these years science has upheld Calvert and Bohr who are not Americans and believed lies that are actually incredible as no actual scientist can lend these ideas their belief anymore unless they rationalize and justify it; its like the climatologists erasing numbers and merely changing them to popular, scary numbers that would garner publicity thus political funding. Niels Bohr is the Hitler of Physics. Or so we allege.

216.

Euro-Trash Science or so I have labeled it, combined with good old fashioned American thievery such as Watson and Crick (birthplace Chicago; Watson is ours and Crick is theirs) and Bill Gates (WA State, another of Obamas haunts) then led to an utter disregard for life in all of the sciences and to licensed, organized physicists telling me and other members of the class with a straight face that Al Gore won Gore V FL and then Bush V Gore and that they could: imbue a machine with a conscience.

217.

A conscience will never be imbued in a machine but a person can come to act or behave as if they are a machine. Only people have a conscience as only people possess motive and intent. While Bill Gates was running around the offices of IBM? I, Susan, was running around the computer science lab at

RPI unbeknownst to RPI. I never profited from what I learned as I did not have their permission but only knew the guy with the key to the lab. I was not trespassing but I was not there with permission either; its most like a conversion of intellectual property. Gates told IMB he could deliver on what he could not: He did not have an operating system; he signed a contract when he could not deliver as he then had to go out and buy someone elses operating system. Gates was not honest about reality or his own persons abilities or his intentions; IBM showed Bill Gates the mouse as we know it. Gates mother told me that she was worried about her sons soul and the planet knows the history of Microsoft plus Gates ended up in Federal Court for anti-trust violations. Watson and Crick, in a round about way, admitted they looked at Rosalind Franklins intellectual property w/o her permission to then secure the helix. As Franklin died she could not receive the Nobel posthumously by rule. Nobody denied theft occurred. I did not end up in Federal Court on the wrong side of an anti-trust case - as the defendant and I am generous as is the class as I am no authoritarian ruler and I do not steal; I am actually wise as Im no machine; I have my own mind, I make my own decisions and I act on my own as does the class; I knew I might see something that day I might get an idea I would otherwise never have - and that I could not steal it or use it in anyway to earn a personal profit and that anything that did come of it would be public property or an actual gift. I would need to give RPI credit. All these years later as Gates and I were at work in the 70s? You are only now seeing come to fruition what I saw in the 70s but I couldnt believe unjust men actually went to wise machines in or around 2000:

218.

Wise German precision engineering? The electronic scanning machines not The People are wise? The piece of paper with the words Gore V FL on it is wise not Al Gore the person? That last one the class could believe as its possible in the case of Al Gore according to his own testimony. Of course wed have to throw out all of the actual science we know but we have the human ability to suspend our disbelief not our belief to demonstrate not

prove our point of law: Al Gore claims he never inhales but only exhales and that he invented the internet and C-SPAN. Al Gore is an exception to the law as he doesnt respire like the rest of the universe does.

219.

Being alive and standing in West Palm witnessing history in the making, I made some my own self. I thought and wisely so: Gore V FL has been reborn as Bush V Gore? Last time I checked Bush Jr. is not Floridian nor is he the governor of FL. I guess this makes me the governor. As Lord Calvert used the error in one direction the Mason-Dixon survey revealed to measure a mountain in 1774, the very same year Jeffersons A Summary View was published, and Jefferson set Marbury in motion then I myself stopped upon a dime in December of 2000 as I am actually wise: The Liberty Bell cracked tolling John Marshalls funeral. Thats symbolic as everything in the universe is symbolic. A blanket denial of domestic violence in all 50 states perpetrated by the judges themselves in the courts and when every lawyer is acting in open and direct violation of the law as they, lawyers, use this policy to wage crazy making tactics against the judge first? Bush V Gore, brought already in violation of Article 4 Section 4 thus its a double negative or its criminal endemically, up to: Richard Cheney who worked for Nixon and back to Lincoln but forward again to Clinton, William JEFFERSON Clinton, who I, Susan, hold as he was captured the day in 1996 that I, Susan, squared the circle via engaging chain of command in a life or death standoff with a Naval Officer who testified that only I had this ability and capacity so thatBush V Gore is a tie and a crime which I reason and decide once Pennsylvania itself violates Article 4 Section 4! I OWNED THE KNOWLEDGE; MY ACTION IS THE PROOF AS I ACTED TO PLACE MY KNOWLEDGE ON THE COURT RECORD IN WHERE ELSE? PHILADELPHIA COUNTY.

220.

The Naval Officer and I who engaged in a stand off and who I can and will produce? We tied; effectively Clinton then was held between my self and that military Officer Clinton forever sits or exists between myself and that

Naval Officer or between the lawfully set President and Commander thus Clinton cannot run or hide - so it was a matter of who had the first opportunity to sink Clinton. I had the first opportunity: Keep my contract with that Officer or collect thousands and thousands of dollars, maybe millions and trillions. I kept the contract and that is how and why I ended up in Truth or Consequences, NM when I cast that fateful vote, all of my weight, against Clinton and every other law breaker in the US. Later I cast my weight against every criminal on Earth. But I had help: Every actual American who ever came before me and who would come after me.

221.

What did I know, when did I know it and when did I first act upon it? Is derived from Marbury V Madison. I knew that I was born into lethal injury and harm and that no human being could help me so I should throw my case to The Creator as this is America and I am American so I can make a promise I can keep: I could promise to act in defense of humanity so I did. I needed proof; if The Creator would give me proof as no man could then I would never, ever allow anyone to shake my faith; I would have the proof and I would know. US law is only you have to know. If I secured the proof? Then I would act. I could not tell you how exactly. I was 5. I knew I could as I won my first authority case a few months earlier but I could not tell you how. If other people can then I can so its possible: I WILL. This was early 1973 so I threw my case to The Creator and pre-empted Nixon and Watergate thus Dick Cheney, BVG and Obama. I secured the proof so when did I then first act with full knowing, upon my own will and liberty? Kindergarten that same year.

222.

I volunteered to sign my name to be in the cert pool of children who are strong from which a list of suspects would be developed. You had to pass a physical test: Prove you had the human ability to break into Sr. Eileens suitcase full of puppets in broad daylight, right under her nose and after she expressly asked us not to do it. STRONG is a good quality so I was bound and

determined I was going to be the strongest kid in that class and I nearly broke the latch on her suitcase as she had every one of us make an attempt. It was not hard to open; you needed no actual strength. Sr. Eileen said not to worry; she whispered that she knew who did it so she knew I did not. I smelled a rat. I became a list of one as every kid in that class lied about their person. Every child in that room made an attempt NOT to the best of their ability but to lesser ability! Their action was a lie meant to deceive, a play act. Those children reasoned if you are strong then you are guilty while I reasoned strong is good so I need to be strong as guilt was not an idea in my head as I do not lie. Im not guilty so nothing makes me guilty. Sr. Eileen asked who did it? If I did it I would have told her I did it. I have no reasoning, no motive to lie as Im not a liar and Im not afraid of Sr. Eileen; who is? Nobody; nobody was afraid of the nonexistent wrath of Sr. Eileen. Also puppets do not catch my constitutional fancy to this very day; they did not then and they do not now. If Oscar, Grover or Big Bird was in that case I would have absconded with it but not puppets. I reason my decisions so if I ever break into your suitcase full of puppets? Or into your office at the Supreme Court? Trust me: I am willing to be caught. I am willing to experience the consequences. I do not reason my actions and then deny I did it to escape the consequences. I plan upon being caught; it is a given to me. Most people never plan to be caught or if caught plan their escape. Today this denial of reality would be known as the exit strategy. Not me as I was born into America and so into US law; I have no intention of exiting and anyways its not possible in my case as I own the knowledge. I have an entry strategy. Like this: If Sr. Eileen said do not touch her puppets or else the culprit would be scraping gum off of the floor all day long? If I touch your puppets then I am willing to scrape gum off of the floor all day long. Punishment and reward isnt constitutional it is not actual reality but is only your real or is your personal idea of reality - so it does not motivate me. Make touching my puppets a federal case and Ill touch them as now I do have motivation: liberty. I have spent my whole life as a list of one but Kindergarten in 1973 is when I first acted upon fully informed consent. Or so I swear.

223.

In 1999 I was told by PA that I was going to let them blame me for their failure to accord women and children the protection of the law I had to let them charge me with failure to protect or else I would be tortured and I chose: Torture. I was then tortured. I was willing to be tortured. Torture was my choice. It was Ray M.s choice too as hes a Vietnam veteran; obviously we survived and even thrived after the fact as we owned righteous reasoning and a just cause: The People but first our own person. Even if every person in the room believed they had cause we both knew that what they proposed was not humanly possible: These men told us that they could control the truth, that they could control knowledge. Like: Oppenheimer could control the A-Bomb? Like: The Catholic Church could control the Bible? Like: Rosalind Franklin could control the helix? No man can control the truth so we could not give it up, we could not give up a secret of the universe that we held in trust as it existed between our persons and The Creator, unless we know we have the means to give it to all people while preserving the edge the US will have so that unscrupulous men cannot then exploit the vulnerable and defenseless. Ray and I lived the jet age and the nuclear age; we were there so how can we deny the history we lived in our own lifetimes? How could we cross the lines that would then be violating our ethic? We could not. We did not.

224.

I, Susan, had been told that I would be tortured if I signed upon my own will and liberty I could not voluntarily sign but instead had to allow PA to involuntarily force me to comply - yet I did voluntarily sign as I invoked Marbury against PA and then I was told that I would be murdered if I stated for the court record the anti-constitutional policy everyone acknowledged as existent in actual reality but not real in the family courtroom or on the paper that these courts are producing. Every professional I met could name this policy; every lawyer said it was enforced against your will and liberty as soon as the courtroom door closed as no judge was willing consider actual reality, or, no judge in the US in the 50 states was willing to consider the truth but

only a lie, a delusion, that women are not the victims of domestic violence that is endemic and generational like poverty as what women are deprived of is liberty as are their children. Lawyers would say 50 states. Correct as SCOTUS in DC is willing to consider the truth of actual reality which would be why I invoked Marbury: DC is not a state. It was created by: Washington, Jefferson and Hamilton as part of an honor bound contract. Upon the exertion of will and then liberty authorities acted to murder me; if any woman acts independently to wield her vote as weapon in her defense authorities gang up on her meaning and intending to kill her - why? LIABILTY, as a woman with clean hands who is wholly innocent would clean a mans clock!

225.

Whatever I did in life I had better not state the policy for the record so when the judge asked me if I had anything to say? Would I like him to CONSIDER something? I thought, Yes, actual reality but I said, I WANT YOU TO CONSIDER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FAMILY. EP&DP and Article 4 as this began with an invocation of Marbury. Were supposed to be one family. That was the point in space I, Susan, acted to place my knowledge regarding the law and Marbury on the record in a Philadelphia County court as the one thing Susan Herbert couldnt do or she would be killed is turn her back on the untold numbers of women and children being sold into slavery and hell on Earth in open court in the city in which Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence and where the Liberty Bell sits. If I fail to act or act like the cheapest cheapskate of all in the city of brotherly love when I know different? Expect The Creator to weep with sorrow as he gave me the talent and know how to enter SCOTUS by myself. I know and The Creator knows; nobody else ever needs to know. I would be throwing away an opportunity that might never come again and I would have to live with the fact that I failed and so nothing changed for anyone for the rest of my life. I would be guilty of: 1st degree premeditated homicide that rose to treason. Untold billions would be my victims. I would murder my own self; it would be or constitute a form of suicide that is treason. I could argue simple contract law and leave with my kidnapped children (the judge did not

realize I knew US law as he and opposing counsel believed they had pulled a fast one by rigging an appearance so my lawyer could not be present thus I could argue contract law) or I could voluntarily leave without them leave them with the kidnappers as the judge told me he would carry out his threat and now he was acting to do it thus risk it all as my life is or is not as valuable as anybody elses; what do I know to be a law of this universe? Equality. I told the judge: I AM ALL IN. RAISE IT OR FOLD. He folded.

226.

If you sell a woman into slavery you sell her children into slavery so you sell men into slavery. Weve engaged in one long money laundering operation since 1871 and what we are laundering is People as we equate them to amounts of money and then trade them openly. We now have what is a shadow government, an actual shadow government, as the original jurisdiction seats were abandoned in 1914. This became finalized with the advent of the UN/IMF Brettonwoods Agreement and the zip code. Imminent domain became: we own you. What nobody knew is: Sorry fellas! You dont want to fold. Since 1803?

227.

NO JUDICIAL SEAT IN THE US IS CONSTITUTIONALLY SET SO DIRECT ENTRY ALLOWED ME TO BEGIN SETTING THEM THUS BARACK OBAMA AND THE BARACK OBAMA ADMINISTRATION CAN NOT EXECUTE ITS THREAT AGAINST THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY NAMELY THE SIOUX CITY IOWA FEDERAL APPELLATE AS WHAT THEY CANNOT DO IS WHAT THEY SAID THEY WOULD DO: RESTRUCTURE THE FEDERAL COURTS AS THE ACTUAL REASON THEY WANT TO CHANGE ARTICLE III IS TREASON IS NAMED IN ARTICLE III. I HAVE ALREADY SET THE 9 SEATS THE JUSTICES HOLD AND THE SEATS OF TWO SCOTUS CLERKS SO THE CLASS IS HERE TO BEGIN SETTING THE OTHER SEATS AS THE COURT AROSE FROM THE COMMISSIONS JOHN ADAMS SIGNED - THE SAME GROUP OF COMMISSIONS THAT INCLUDED MARBURYS! UNTIL OR UNLESS YOU TEST MARBURY? NO JUDICIAL SEAT IS GOOD AND NEITHER IS ANY LAW LICENSE AS SINCE 1871 SCOTUS HAS NOT HEARD A PRO SE

CASE BROUGHT BY A NON-LAWYER AND THE CHIEF CLERK TOLD ME THAT HE HATED MOTHERS AND NON-LAWYERS; MOTHERS AND NON-LAWYERS WERE HIS NAMED REASON FOR DELIBERATELY SINKING THIS CASE.

228. The SCOTUS docket? Do not believe what you see as I directly entered twice over and then a third time indirectly and I did secure official, legal, formal, actual default but John Roberts would have to be a stark raving lunatic to create these entries and not one piece of evidence exists to support that claim. In a case that directly enters upon authority and o.j. or upon actual default on the part of the US the Chief Justice must hear it in person or state his reasoning to deny in writing or else he has zero rational basis. If its not US law in this case then what is it? A CRIME. I and then the class possess no evidence at all that supports John Roberts is a stark raving lunatic or John Roberts, the exact John Roberts that is the Chief Justice of the US is a criminal.

229. We have absolute proof that William Suter the Chief Clerk is a criminal. 8 people were murdered in AZ; Jared Laughner? Hes the extreme opposite of Rudolph Hess; every willing victim and willing victimizer falls between these two extremes. If the application for a stay, two of them, had been filed then Jared Laughner never shoots as he would know other people did understand something was wrong so he was not alone; Laughner is all id while Hess is all ego; that is hat happens when you come to exist wholly outside of yourself or inside yourself in such a way it then is your sense of self. Clemons in AZ so she was within physical striking distance of Laughner. This is not a civil conviction as its history and if you check Suters name is not in the case caption. And: Leo Donofrio documented the SCOTUS docket being tampered with in real time as it happened to him also. The difference? I mailed an emergency application for a stay along with an actual petition that I, working alone, turned around in about 36 hours; I told the clerks I would be sending in a petition once default occurred and I then authored the stay. Donofrio did

not enter any separate petition. The stay was meant and intended to stay default so Roberts and the other Justices thus The People could begin setting the Judiciary to prevent overthrow and have the debate. The first stay, like this second stay, was never filed as it would go to Roberts. The clerks who are guilty do not want Roberts thus you to know what they did. Or so we allege. The first stay sat inside the court for about two weeks only being returned to me AFTER a supposed conference took place thus making any actual emergency stay impossible because: THE CLERKS RETURNED THE PETITION WHEN THEY RECEIVED IT AND LOOKED TO FIND NO APPLICATION HAD BEEN FILED AS TWO DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS WITHIN THE SAME ONE OFFICE HANDLE IT. Thus I had the petition but no stay so I phoned to ask WHERE IS THE STAY AND WHY DIDNT YOU FILE IT AND THIS PETITION AS A STAY IS IS IS IS UPON DEFAULT? I was told: Just tell her well send it. File clerk Clayton Higgins and I were both the victims of a crime as Higgins never saw the stay. The People were directly harmed as well.

230.

The only person I know of who actually argued US law and case law with William Suter and who actually used the word treason in later communication and received a response is my person, Susan Herbert, therefore I can and will state the above regarding William Suter as fact of my person and history that transpired. In my case it does not constitute a civil conviction; it might if any other person made this statement. I have not asked Suter in person if he is or is not a criminal and/or a traitor or: I have not yet taken his testimony regarding what he knew, when he knew and when he acted upon it yet. If he gives such testimony in a civil court it is not then a criminal charge or even a criminal case as it would be up to me to press criminal charges against him as any crime happened to me as Marbury is you must know and I did when it occurred. I, Susan, would need to take other or more testimony from Suter but in Obamas case he already testified to me or otherwise placed it on the record thus I meant and intended to run him into international water at the 2010 State of the Union Address:

231. As Obama is Canadian or Kenyan and thereby British? High treason is what you do while high traitor is what you are. In Britain you do not mean to overthrow The People but you mean to steal the crown. [State department records seem to confirm that upon adoption and/or school registration that Obama held Indonesian citizenship; he was Indonesian on paper.] In Britain birth does not matter as you were not born wearing the crown or youd already be under it, wearing it, get it? Youre an outsider who has manipulated others to then get close to the crown; youve climbed the social ladder until youve reached the pinnacle: You positioned yourself at or around the crown. In America you are born into the Office of the Executive. President is both something that happens to you and that you act to secure. You secure it by: VOTING.

232. DC circa 1973 2011: The People were uninformed. Deliberately. We named a few of the culprits. We are aware and fully cognizant of the fact that this is a civil court so this is a civil suit. We do not control the actions of other people; if its on the SCOTUS docket? Or if its enshrined in Resolution 511? Crime is self-evident. So is: The constitutionally set government of Susan, as President or Commander, and Ray M. as Secretary of Defense, John Roberts as Chief Justice, Al Franken as Senator from MN while also President of the Senate Pro Tempore (this also might make him President of the Senate and so VP due to our VPs passing [Johnson]), Charles Rangel as NY State Senator while Speaker of the House and Henry Adams as Federal Judge and Chief Judge of the 11th Circuit, Jacksonville Division. Henry Adams might be the Chief Judge of the 11th Circuit itself due to chain of command. Others have volunteered but the People are here to secure the office known as their vote thus the government NOT to secure an office as in a paid officer. Very voter holds every office simultaneously as their vote is equal to Executive Order; some of us volunteered to act or rose via legal claim but it matters not if we ever actually sit.

233. Jessie Johnson owns the priceless intellectual property regarding why and how people keep falling for the ultra-violent military dictators we see continuously rising and falling in Africa; he knows exactly what these people feel and what the exacting nature of the illusion is, or, exactly what these unjust men exploit. Jesse Johnson came to be in a legal situation that left him acting VP and he consented and then agreed to bring the qualification known as being the resident of a different state forward as Texas is his fact which I can prove although he lives in Florida thus Voters would have to vote their conscience (although Johnson died this is yet on the table not only as we allege Cheney was not a resident of Wyoming but the SCOTUS clerks refused to comply with the Disabilities Act unless you were a spectator only; if you are a petitioner they said they had no such accommodations as did the office responsible for handling such accommodations when Jessie had a disability). Ray M. consented to act as Secretary of Defense upon my conscripting him; he is best utilized as Secretary of Defense; he chose that and I agreed. Thus far it has been one the best decisions I have made in my life. Susan Clemons owns genius intellectual property concerning belief systems, language and propaganda. I did not recruit anybody; they found me thus their own case or they otherwise volunteered. Some voters were in the process of petitioning SCOTUS their own selves but found that I had made the case already. Not one person believed petitioning SCOTUS or the Court is impossible.

234.

If I need a Senator as America has been shot in the heart thus I must name the entry and exit wounds to make the case in an airtight fashion so the world may not object as it had at least 3 opportunities and failed to do so? Then if I hear Al Franken tell the truth instead of continuing to lie just as he pits the People against the Judiciary he is President of the Senate Pro Tempore as: HE VOLUNTEERED TO TELL THE TRUTH. Al Franken, the only lying liar in the Senate now not lying as he could not tell the lie Barack Obama and election 08 did wonderful things for us after decrying Citizens United but instead said The truth is its none of these things; the truth is

its us . The book which Franken actually wrote himself is named Lies (And the Lying Liars Who Tell Them): A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right. A US Marshall named Mike Sanford can give supporting testimony to the fact that I knew to name Franken and Rangel years ago; I turned Rangel into the IRS in or around 1990 and then into Congress and Obama and turned Franken into the US Marshalls Service in 2008. I am still in possession of a piece of evidence never tampered with which you can and may compare to a piece of evidence the US Marshalls service possesses. Al Franken and Charles Rangel know of this suit; I served them and then I asked them directly if they wished to opt out; they did not choose to exclude themselves from the class known as The People aka The Proof of Life Cases.

235.

I pre-empted the usurpers and traitors as by turning you, all 300 million of you and then 6 billion of you, into the IRS as via a found claim I protected you. Foreign aid counts. Maybe you did it but are you then automatically guilty of a crime? We use the words guilt and crime but we know the difference between historical fact and legal fact and civil and criminal. For instance you will not find Thurgood Marshall on any historic list of Chief Justices as he only acted as if in Lassiter and Rotsker even naming constitutional authority exactly; we might write Thurgood Marshall was Chief Justice but we mean he acted as if and he could actually protect the class as it seems as if Thurgood Marshall used nasty lawyer tricks to slip Brown past you but did he? Legally Thurgood Marshall did act as Chief Justice at least once proving he could protect the class after he entered and won Brown V Topeka so historically he was never the Chief Justice but legally he was as he acted as if. We looked for an invocation of moral authority that carried the day as most every lawyer and politician tells himself its safe to play these games on paper Marshall himself personified the pieces of paper - when it is not as that person who is a lawyer or politician cannot then protect the class. Thurgood Marshall could. We can:

236. I, Susan, secured a found claim against all 300 million Americans and planet Earth; I secured a found claim against America 1871 in or around 1990 by turning everybody into the IRS out of NY and then against Earth in on the SCOTUS docket 2008 as I discovered every reason or causation regarding endemic generational poverty. I made a whistle blowers claim and won; I named a person not guilty as I had to save the lives of 3 exacting children and the guilty parties told me that this man, Ron Gardiner, was their fall guy; this claim then wiped out everyone in the chain up to PRESIDENT of the US once it was found; I could name Ron Gardiner as he is the father of Cameron Gardiner, one of the children in immediate mortal danger, and as Ron Gardiner asked for my help and showed me the books covering a community center where I was employed that also housed: HEAD START.

237. Head Start was founded in order to end poverty. My experience told me that I may have solved endemic poverty as I could name it but I seemed to be missing something; I knew so what dont you know? Then Ron told me by showing me the books. When I received a paycheck for about $8 at Christmas? And when I worked about 80 hours? I went directly to the cronies who never realized it was city, county, state and federal or that I had seen the books. They kept saying: RON & TIME CLOCK. No, a person wrote and signed this check; who? They said TIME CLOCK. My father who happened to be present said, you do not have a right to not pay federal taxes as some people will need that money while some choose not to collect. Some people will take the money only as they paid in; its a choice. You do not have a right to limit or deny a person the choice IF they volunteer to pay in. These men told me their entire plan as Nazis are not self-aware nor are they aware of their surroundings. I could be dressed up like Robin Hood and they still wouldnt see me for who I am. Ron did. Now, did Ron Gardiner cut that check to deliberately place me, a genius and actual American who seems to completely lack value judgments so I must know something he does not, in their path? Maybe:

238.

Bookkeeping is not accounting; you cook the books to hide motive and intent as People, the book, has that while you account for the numbers as the numbers do not have motive. We have two accounting houses, the IRS and GAO; the book, The People, is irreconcilable with the Federal Budget signed by the President and Commander. The IRS is The People while the GAO is The People who are paid officers so that the Officers appear in both accounts. The book the Officers produce, the Federal Budget, in no way matches the book known as The People! Subtract; what number have you got? IMAGINARY NUMBERS THAT GO INTO THE NEGATIVE WHEN LEGALLY THATS NOT POSSIBLE. UNIVERSAL LAW IS YOU CANNOT CREATE NOR DESTROY ENERGY BUT MERELY CHANGE IT FROM ONE FORM INTO ANOTHER SO YOU CAN LAUNDER ALL THE MONEY YOU WISH BUT I WILL ALWAYS BE ABLE TO FOLLOW THE PAPER TRAIL EVEN IF YOU BILL THE CIAS BUSINESS FRONT AS I AM NOT AN LLC. I own the point of reference no other American does: My one vote wielded as an Executive Order.

239.

We have a set amount of energy as The People are it. If you believe you cannot measure personhood? Wrong! Gravity bends light, remember? Light then has weight. Congress prints money at its whim and will as if it can create and destroy energy. The so-called IMF/UN? As it is inextricably tied to us it has imploded. As Im constant I sloooowly made the case, launching my attack from FL in 1996. This clock? Obama can keep comparing himself to FDR as FDR foisted the IMF/UN on us and when FDR first ceded The People to the IMF/UN and then secured and filed the Treaty four or five months later. FDR ceded our custody to Europe and the Soviets but filed the Treaty with the UN afterwards so it, the UN, was never legal and we have no contract. See my Motion To Reconsider Your Own Destiny And Fate. The reason Stalin walked away with half of Europe is FDR as he refused to consider that the Soviets slaughtered the Polish in the Katyn Forest so that they must be every bit as bad as the Nazis; when people around him would not let him deny it FDR sent one of them to American Samoa and he went! His last name is Earl; his son told me that his father engaged in grudge match rather than

quit and sue FDR. Earl predicted the rise of the Soviets so FDR banished him as if he didnt then FDR could not force the UN on us nor could he dump any financial problems on the IMF. Do not kid yourselves: FDR wanted to cede our sovereignty as it did not cause him any grief and hed be dead by the time I came along looking to clean his exact clock.

240. The clock or our heart began ticking again on July 4th, 2006, as that is the day I ventured into death with knowing and willingness as when The Creator pinged me I received the message. I knew my death would occur that day. I knew as absolute fact my death would be coming at or before age 40, I knew it as if it is an unchangeable law of Susan, but that day it was imminent and so I ran towards The Creator. Only a criminal would run away from The Creator.

241.

I have never needed a watch to tell time; now I know why. As I rode in a taxi along Penman Road taxi is the only universal word there is thus I was in an actual universal vehicle I had the 7 sacred experiences of God to be had on Earth moving seamlessly from one to the next as I named the science ending at Philadelphia, a state of being beyond enlightenment. As the natural forces interacted I hit zero point and lapped myself, landing before or with The Creator. In between The Creator showed me the truth of whom and what we are. I knew the whole truth of everything including my own self. But that is what I asked for in 1973: The truth. I experienced the living death and actually made it to The Creator. The Creator adjudicated or judged my case not accountable, not responsible and not guilty - as everything that ever happened to me was not my fault as another person acted to harm me with deliberation while I never acted to harm another with deliberation. The Creator told me no matter what I believed to be true, the truth is any injury or harm another person claims I caused is not my fault, as I did not cause it; causation is the fault of others. I suspected this. The Creator told me that I had done everything a human being needed to do. Then The Creator named

an event only THE Creator could know of and told me that I had a mistaken belief regarding human grief as the emotion and physical sensation I had felt is not actual human grief. I mistakenly believed it was. The Creator made me an offer: Will you experience human grief? Will I? Of course I will as who does everything they need to do and then quits here? Who isnt curious to then know? I said, I will and that is when the hammer dropped.

242. The class and I are aware that you will want to deny this. I am not the only member of the class to have experienced dying and something coming after and millions of people have had like experiences. Richard Pait, the class musical expert, has me beat: He died twice once blowing his heart valve out while playing the trumpet. Co-counsel Susan Clemons? She experienced a form of the living death as she bore the crushing weight of actual human guilt. She said, I will. Currently a television show explores the universal truth of experiencing something after physical death, allowing people to give first person testimony to what they themselves experienced. There is no 2nd or 3rd person narrator. My own father had a brush with death when he had a massive heart attack around age 40 and he told me many years later that he made a decision born of his own will and liberty to return to this life. Something has to die in order for something to be born. Or so we allege.

243.

SUB PONDERE CRESCO: Under the weight I increase, or so we allege.

244.

I can and will give you intimate, graphic details as its science and as everything I perceived and experienced is symbolic for the truth. The context is the universe. The Creator appears in a form that you will understand and imparts wisdom to you; the Creator uses what is symbolic so you cannot read any salvation history literally and what you perceive may not be exactly, literally true as it depends upon how you process the experience based upon the filter that is your belief system. Mine is US law and case law.

BVG? That too is a symbolic representation but in that instance lawyers wanted to impart lies to us not knowledge, not genius and not wisdom. Or so we allege.

245.

Everything in this universe is symbolic; I will say this over again as even the whole universe is a symbol: Ever notice how the universe looks like a hurricane? Everything symbolizes a universal truth as it is the product of universal law at work; you actualize the truth or realize the lies. You manifest reality; you manifest the truth or you manifest the lie but you can only actualize the truth. You do not believe its possible to experience a world or dimension beyond this one and you do not believe in A Creator or US law but you do believe in BVG and Obama? You realized BVG while I actualized US law: BVG is our opportunity to flee Corporate Egypt as William Moses Rehnquist just parted the purple sea. As I know how this story ends we escape Pharaoh only to reinstitute slavery in another form I am making my run for the Supreme Court thus creating a brand new twist in the plotline as this time I am bringing 6 billion people in with me whether they personally like the law of this universe or not.

246.

This nation has now begun to put women to death via defining death when it cannot yet prove life scientifically and logic is you cannot know death until you first prove life. An EEG machine is not designed or calibrated to measure the form of energy we call consciousness and a conscience. Ray M. and I know what this technology is. The scientific race known as The Resolution of Uniformity has been on since Einstein defined Relativity and then Special Relativity; there is another scientific race in progress, the race to define human consciousness. Like Calvert made his first mistake by moving to Scotland? Science made its first mistake by calling it human consciousness as its the Universal or God Consciousness and everything in the universe possesses or is conscious even time itself but humans imbued with the divine endowment then have a conscience con-science as humans emote

and reason so what we possess is emotional reasoning capacity. We possess god capacity. Orangutans do not emotionally reason their position in life; they do not aspire. Thats what you had to pursue and measure, our socalled god spot or our mind, as like Thomas Jefferson weighed himself against the Earth you had to weigh yourself against the universe and so the Universal Consciousness. You had to weigh yourself against The Creator. My conscience? My motive is liberty and my intention is justice. It is the same for the class.

247.

Turn the Constitution over, as if its a photographic negative. Then flip it on its head so its upside down. That then is ego redux and that is every case after BVG as BVG is propaganda. The unjust Officers who are the Broken Trust began arguing in the negative around 1950 but they are arguing the 1871 version of the Constitution in the negative NOT the original documents. As of BVG it became an actual double negative. As SCOTUS argues the originals? SCOTUS has been effectively cancelling out one lie leaving one behind so in its rulings you will hear the original lie the lawyers told: Citizens United? Say it like this: As Barack Obama bought the Office now you can all buy the Office as thats equal! Whats the lie lawyer Obama is telling as are the BVG lawyers? That they did not buy the office. What SCOTUS has been doing unknowingly and I have been doing with deliberation is: REVERSE PROPAGANDA.

248.

Spike Lees Do The Right Thing is an example of reverse propaganda. You experience the exacting emotions you feel when you watch this movie as Lee is pinging the exacting nature of the injury you have suffered due to prejudice. Lee is telling Americas Big Truth. Its auditory, visual and emotional. My most successful piece of reverse propaganda would be my Motion; Americans love that Motion and how it states the reasoning in plain, conversational English while turning the unjusts words and actions back on them via common sense. That motion laid waste to about 150 years of injury

and harm thus the voters responded. Then I knew: Article III as any citizen can invoke Article III if they are equaling the Chief Justice as if nothing else John Marshall said so. Did Marbury ever happen? Did Marshall ever live?

249.

Judicial review is the myth of fingerprints as justice does not exist only as a Judiciary does; if that were true then China would be a just nation as they have a Judiciary. History is fact that then becomes a story and then a legend; then the legend turns to myth. Until you test Marbury thus A Summary View and so all of US law and case law? You are myth. Some myths? They never transpired. America did; once upon a time America and Americans knew liberty.

250. We alive today may have begun accruing injury and harm as early as 1835, when Marshall died as no person was left to defend the original class as the Chief Justice stands aside or down the President and Commander and I may be the only person who has the human ability and capacity to do so since. Earl Warren may have had this capacity; I do not know as absolute fact as he was never tested fully. After the Missouri Compromise had us drawing a physical boundary that marked our insanity as a people as we had law we did not live out thus the Missouri Compromise was the realization of the lie we were telling ourselves and each other as a nation and after Marshall was dead, who was left to protect The People when civil war was now going to transpire as absolute fact as we passed the event horizon? I am; we are. The Founders hope? THE VOTE US - AS WE LIVE TO PROVE WHETHER OR NOT THEIR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IS GOOD AND IS THE ACTUAL SCIENCE. THE PEOPLE PROVE THE FOUNDERS LIVED AND STILL LIVE NOW AND THAT WE DID WIN THE REVOLUTION AS WHAT WE PROVE IS IT WAS AN ACTUAL JUST CAUSE SO A WAR FOUGHT FOR ACTUAL RIGHTEOUS REASONING. Cornwallis surrendering at Yorktown? A good or solid win.

251.

Theres never been a race scientific or otherwise towards resolving equality. We only said there was. We pretended and play acted. This nation has never wanted to resolve equality but now it needs to do so as it is a matter of life and death as actual foreignization of the Executive is a clear and present danger. You may not want to believe you have elected actual Nazis but you have as what you have elected are people who are authoritarian rulers with a Modern perspective. Moderns do not believe in God; they are atheists no matter what they tell you or else they would never act as they do nor escalate the injury and harm to death. Moderns employ force and are driven to prove they are superior. The class and I along with co-counsel Susan Clemons can exactly quantify what a Nazi is or is not as the form is the same as only the labels and costumes change. We can quantify despot and fascist. This is about belief systems and biology as Nazi is a belief system and a personality type. You have been told Hitlers Big Lie a second time and third time and you believed it over again as nothing has changed since WWII. Accounting for every fact? Women were safer in 1776 at the height of the Revolution and without antibiotics.

252.

People alive when the Missouri Compromise was proposed believed Thomas Jefferson had lost his mind as he was so vehemently against it. Jefferson was against lying, to yourself or each other. Jefferson knew that we were deluding and defrauding ourselves; it is a form of mental illness. Jefferson said, ...But this momentous question, like a firebell in the night, awakened and filled me with terror. I considered it at once as the knell of the Union. It is hushed, indeed, for the moment. But this is a reprieve only, not a final sentence. A geographical line, coinciding with a marked principle, moral and political, once conceived and held up to the angry passions of men, will never be obliterated; and every new irritation will mark it deeper and deeper. I can say, with conscious truth, that there is not a man on earth who would sacrifice more than I would to relieve us from this heavy reproach, in any practicable wayI regret that I am now to die in the belief that the

useless sacrifice of themselves by the generation of 1776, to acquire self-government and happiness to their country, is to be thrown away by the unwise and unworthy passions of their sons, and that my only consolation is to be that I live not to weep over it. If they would but dispassionately weigh the blessings they will throw away against an abstract principle more likely to be effected by union than by scission, they would pause before they would perpetrate this act of suicide on themselves, and of treason against the hopes of the world. The class is not composed of traitors; we are not suicidal. We constitute hope for this world.

253.

The Founders told you never forget long before the Jews who survived WWII. A part of that is: You cannot remember what you never lived; you cannot know what has not yet transpired so all you can do is prepare. If The Founders tell you that they do not know something so you might have to learn it all by yourself and then act in the moment? BELIEVE THEM! They are your standard. Nobody appointed the Founders so do not think someone will appoint you. Theres a reason failure to act is never an option, failure to act is not on the table at all in any way, if you are American: Failure to act is certain death. Say it this way: Failure to prove my self and what I do or do not believe via my own action is certain death.

254.

If both Jesus and Thomas Jefferson tell you whatever you do in life do not go to the lawyers? BELIEVE THEM AS A LAWYER IS A LAWYER IN ANY FORM. For the purposes of this case we will divide all lawyers into three categories as previously mentioned: constitutionalists, physicists and theologians. Almost every single lawyer I have ever met is real on paper only not actual. They can and do work up a storm when it comes to denying others liberty but they cannot move when it comes to according others liberty. Without their paper propping them up and that they then hide behind? They have nothing. The vote is real on paper only to these people; you could place The Roadrunner &

The Coyote on the ballot and these people would claim cartoons are qualified. Or so we allege as I acted upon my knowledge:

255.

As unjust men deserved it as they earned it I proved that they would nominate a cartoon and did in fact elect a cartoon. I overturned the law degree, the law license and ABA membership as Chicago is the home of the ABA headquarters. I took Obamas degree and overturned it, exactly as I overturned BVG: I turned the piece of paper over. Then I wrote: Roadrunner. Next I took his license, overturned it and wrote Coyote. Finally I took his ABA membership card and flipped it writing ACME. I used a copy or another form of these documents not the actual physical documents in Obamas possession. Then I mailed it off, as I first told unjust men that IM the Roadrunner and THEYRE the Coyote in 2008 but the unjust bit regardless. The 2010 SOTUA was - is - a cartoon court. Its the cartoonish personification of legal cheese as is BVG. Recently I wrote, ACME CORP. copyright 1803: DO NOT PASS GO; DO NOT LEAVE SCOTUS TO BEGIN WITH. THE 2010 SOTUA CONSTITUTES AN OPEN CONFESSION TO TREASON IN COURT. In the future you might not want to buy your legal arguments or your life story from ACME. The 2010 SOTUA?

256.

Again, I engineered it. It constitutes Obama acting to civilly convict the Chief Justice and other Justices. Its how Obama and other unjust men plan to unseat the Judiciary via rendering it powerless: Securing civil convictions against Judges using their own rulings. I was told that the Obama Administration plans to use the rulings Federal Judges have been issuing against The People as their proof to then gain a civil conviction thus trick The People into cooperating. Thus I did some reverse engineering. Fully knowing that the Federal Judiciary and The People had no idea that Obama could not argue law and/or that he is actually foreign I engineered this show. I was deliberate as I had to create the venue for the class when the Judiciary failed to do so as only licensed lawyers have been allowed entry to court when no

licensed lawyer can sue another licensed lawyer in civil court when one of them is acting as an Officer of the Judiciary or the Executive with or without the authority of the US. First a lawyer would have to admit that he knowingly, willingly and deliberately participated. The federal agent at my front door in February of 2010, dressed like a federal agent with a badge but who was an independent operator and an absolute stranger, kept saying that there was something Obama could do like throwing Christians to the lions he described it like that with other words and he escalated it to the Chief Justice would be the gladiator in the lions den. I kept saying I BELIEVE YOU, as thats the SOUTA I engineered last month. He couldnt make me afraid and I couldnt figure out what he did not know as it was a worldwide broadcast. He knew US V Benson as he finally described that but told me a fact I did not know; US V Benson is the US issuing a gag order without any clear and present danger being named that phrase is absent from the ruling so its a joke and an incredible violation of rights galore as apparently Benson was not allowed to be in the room nor was his attorney thus the clear and present danger would be a US Attorney, but when I said UNIQUE he said SCOTUS CERTIFIED DOESNT MATTER. Thats not what is unique about my person. I not once said I would be representing my own self. Criminal charges mean you are to have representation as a right. I ALREADY WON THE CRIMINAL CASE OR YOU WOULDNT BE HERE THREATENING TO KILL ME AS DIRECT ENTRY TO SCOTUS UPON A CHARGE OF TREASON NEVER WOULD HAVE TRANSPIRED was lost on him. This man just said GIDEON to me, or, we will not press a charge to prevent you from securing legal representation as it would be a criminal charge; Obama would have to charge me criminally so you have to violate GIDEON and thats never going to happen as that is a concentration camp.

257.

To toss you in a concentration camp, a military run civilian camp, they have to first get rid of the Judiciary or else people like me would yet petition the courts. The world would know. Idiots like John Woo or rather Yoo never reasoned (idiot is my personal opinion only): What if she can get into

SCOTUS directly and does it BEFORE we lock her up w/o any charge being pressed? Why, millions of people across Earth would be looking for me, thats what. No person on Earth could say to me what this man said unless: Barack Obama himself sent him due to unique facts of our lives and due to what I wrote in the Sioux City suit. I meant and intended to enact chain of command and land on Obamas desk as I was serving him in actuality. I successfully served him. Obama had to DIRECTLY participate in the decision to threaten to murder me. That was always our plan! See the world court suit and never filed most recent stay; the class can argue admiralty law to a time before Justinian and the Catholic Church as we own the correct human migration record; we can and will argue a clause written in Washingtons own hand regarding human rights law and the high seas that now pertains to the broken DC Trust.

258.

The only lawful vote ever cast in the US as equality eluded us belonged to me as that Naval Officer acknowledged me before Clintons re-election bid clearly defining that we were invoking the power of Executive Order as he believed the Military thus The People had deluded and defrauded him and they had. And: I received the only valid vote is election 2008 never counted: Florida vote number 2340000161, cast by a natural born American registered in Duval County, Florida. I was inside SCOTUS then and direct entry occurred twice over and then the US defaulted on 11/05/08 so this vote is the only lawful vote cast as this citizen acted alone upon fully informed consent and did so without approaching me until after the fact; later I would receive a second lawful vote. See attached sworn statement. Or so we allege.

259.

Knowing I or that Officer held Clinton I cast my weight against Clinton. I ascended. I had to exhaust a states highest court as I was tossed back and forth so that did not occur until December 2005. In my case NY State issued an appellate ruling in which the Bill of Rights is violated it is an exactly

worded violation that constitutes nothing more or less than a guilty verdict in a FAMILY court or is a civil conviction when guilt is not even an issue in family court and NYs highest court, Appeals, then issued a ruling and order stating the reasons Im guilty are woman, poor and Susan doesnt know something as NY is hiding it from her. I kid you not; NY used other words like indigent and no issue but the day I read this piece of paper in December of 2006 I said, out loud, If I do not know something its only because NY cant have me knowing and I flew down to the library to look. I could see federal civil conviction from a mile away. I found:

260.

Nicholson V Scopetta, a case regarding domestic violence and NYC that was returned to NY by.SCOTUS and without named reasoning. Someone speculated that the reason is rights for women then meant too many rights for women and so not enough privilege for men. I believe that is partly it but I also believe you must make an attempt and in this case NY made no attempt but sent it ahead to SCOTUS and I believe that if John Roberts knew the truth not what lawyers feed him day and night when it is not the truth then he never would have sent this case back to NY whereby every person in NY immediately denied it existed. The eventual ruling for women was promptly denied by everyone as if it never happened as they are now in such deep denial that it constitutes delusion. Recall that Adams said, Its a wonder Luther ever broke the spell? Its a wonder that I ever broke the spell lawyers have the voters under.

261.

I first noticed this delusion in NY when every single person I ever met when I was raised in NY DENIED that Nelson A Rockefeller ever sat as VP. Not one single teacher ever said it nor did any other NYer. You know how I found out? Playing Trivial Pursuit. I refuse to vest my belief in what is not true:

262. Gerald Ford cannot possibly be legal nor constitutionally set as ignorance is not an excuse and so to believe he did not know is to claim ignorance. Also current chain of command is not constitutional and those who installed or inserted it knew it was not constitutional. Rockefeller? NEVER THE VP as Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld PUBLICLY said that they did not believe the VP was in the chain of command so they acted to exclude him and did thus: Rockefeller never acted as the VP as Cheney and Rumsfeld did. They also managed to do an end run around Ford: Term limits on the President? Thats a term limit on your vote as Ford said. Check me as the 25th Amendment is not only wrong concerning proper chain of command but it contains an extra S that the author has said was NOT in it so somebody had to add it before it went to press thus the entire meaning is changed and it now protects a coup by crony. Congress never passed this amendment as it was published but only as the author, a scholar, wrote it. Ultimately its the means to annihilate Congress. First we get an extra S and then we get presidential term limits courtesy of WHO? Cheney and Rumsfeld. These two were in progress and then they were there.

263. In or around 2005 people began to notice this S as it makes a singular then a plural thus CHANGES executive power, or, the power of the voters is handed to cronies. Hence all of the Russian Royal Czars popping up in the US Whitehouse. This extra S actually caused the US Military to mistakenly believe they should back a foreign coup AGAINST American women and children. I know as I phoned a JAG Officer and asked. I corrected this mistaken belief. I sat in the library that day asking: Nicholson. Out of NY. What came before? What came after? Is Roberts my problem? John Jay of NY is first; why is Roberts who is extraordinarily young the exception to the rule? Its not super-legal genius as that is me so then, is Dick Cheney actually trying to harm me from beyond his grave? YES.

264.

I predicted: Roberts is it; he is an idiot or he will be the victim of a civil conviction and only Susan Herbert will be able to defend him. Equilibrium means he too will be the victim of a civil conviction as I was. I stand alone, alone among 300 million. Roberts might become a super-legal genius if I test Marbury as I can and may sue him to take out every criminal. I am proven! Victim of a civil conviction is it not idiot as I proved that to myself when Roberts had a seizure.

265.

If we enter the actual science successfully re-reasoning Roe V Wade in light of the correct application of the EP&DP clauses who is the only man who can ever rule on when life begins for a fetus thus it is a person? A MAN WHO HAS EXPERIENCED A SEIZURE AS HE WILL KNOW THE TRUTH OF THE SCIENCE AS HE EXPERIENCED THAT SAME ELECTRICAL STORM IN HIS BRAIN. Otherwise no man has any life experience concerning being pregnant or giving birth to babies. A mans testimony is forever hearsay and suggestive but never evidence and never proof. Another judge who is a man may examine our science and test it; he may hear my proof of life and even meet my son Christopher who is a named legal unborn person at age 14. He can and may issue an opinion and order us ahead to SCOTUS but only John Roberts can issue an opinion and order based upon EXACTLY worded law and the EXACT science which matches US law as only he has had the life experience. To my knowledge this makes Roberts unique in this nation as I could not find another judge who had a seizure. John Roberts? The class surprised itself as he too is an absolute class of one. US law works perfectly: Roberts addresses his own injury by hearing the case as you never enter a US courtroom believing the judge is stupid or prejudiced. You can and you do but you may not. Will Roberts favor us over any other people? I hope not. Its irrational to abuse power in SCOTUS: you only harm yourself, directly as after SCOTUS comes The People and Justices are one. If John Roberts abused power in SCOTUS or lied under oath it constitutes treason. If Roberts is wrong? Then we would have evidence in support of idiot and stark raving lunatic. [Note: Roberts fudging the oath upon swearing Obama in and the videotape

Orly Taitz took of Roberts when she confronted him in Idaho which she plays for the public? My best proof FOR Roberts as Taitz can cry victim but her claim is not possible as shes Russian born and as she never entered SCOTUS directly. Plus: If you create the venue in Idaho? No cameras are allowed in SCOTUS and yet Taitz videotaped the proceedings when she knew cameras arent allowed and why, as photographs like fingerprints prove nothing.]

266.

After Nicholson my super-legal genius self looked at the Iroquois Constitution and the human migration record. Hiawatha was moved by human grief and when he looked up Deganawidah was walking towards him from across the water, as if he was walking on water. That makes sense as the Iroquois made it all the way North and then down. Rare X among the Sioux? The Chinese had to skip across the Pacific island hopping which then reasons the massive body of star knowledge the Sioux have as you would need it to do this. I knew exactly and specifically how and why the magnetic north pole is moving to Siberia: 1054, 1954, 2054. Its intertwined with volcanology namely the Italian Caldera versus Yellowstone as one is going to erupt thus Krakatoa or: Croatoan, Virginia Dare. Dare is the first European person whose birth was recorded. She has a paper birth certificate unlike Obama! I checked myself: The signal was carve a Maltese cross on a tree nearby to indicate that their disappearance had been forced but Croatoan and Cro was found: straight as the crow flies; we voluntarily assimilated. Dares descendants? They came to live in: PERSON COUNTY. Who was the first European to land in what became the US that we have a paper record of? A woman named Juana Ruiz who came here on the Santa Maria Consolacion, the same Santa Maria that Columbus sailed; she arrived with two free black men named on the ships manifest; it was part of a public and private concern and they, captained by Ponce De Leon, landed in St. Augustine where I was conceived in the spring of 1967. These people landed almost 100 years before Jamestown but they were not the first to visit the North American continent or the country that we now call the US. Did I actually stumble upon what I think I have? When I acted in Philadelphia did I take a

great big bite of the apple The Signers waved in front of my face? Did I actually make it to the ends of the universe and back again upon faith alone? I OWNED HOW AND WHY MAGNETIC NORTH MOVES.

267.

Heres some of the science; this is a little long but the Cherokee and Hopi asked me to answer this question as did MN and I owe the Iroquois for giving me magnetic north; they might never see the attachment so I placed it within the complaint; also I found that the first Native to become a lawyer died not to long ago at age 82 when Natives should possess the ability and capacity to think in theoretical terms due to their sense of spirituality that is not paganism; think: Natives Like women have only been entering law school for about 60 years? Why arent there more Native lawyers and did affirmative action give us an excuse to lie as in hire the unqualified but call it justice? Did it harm us not help us? I found out! Be prepared to feel as if you are being hit with a wall as that happens if youve been injured; dont forget: Al Franken is from Minnesota; legally he may enter SCOTUS directly as a Senator and I have a claim against MN as I spent what is arguably the worst night of my life there and almost froze to death in minus 22 degree weather; how else can I get my hands on or reason MNs Kensington Runestone? All of this intellectual property existed in plain sight the trick was unifying it. The class holding you is not necessarily a bad thing as it might be the very thing that sets you constitutionally and proves the validity of your claim as the Kensington Runestone has been debated for decades. The Sioux? They are in possession of priceless neuroscience but did not know it until they exposed me to it and I recognized it as actual neuroscience that has to do with our language centers in our brains. The Sioux knew it worked to sever the injury but did not know it is actual neuroscience. Again we are all to be on the same side as the versus in any lawsuit is merely a fulcrum; as it feels as if a wall hits you as it did throughout this complaint or so we hypothesize injured): based upon prior experience merely note that youve been

The Vikings mapped out the LA Purchase - part of it - before anyone else. If you examine the Kensington Rune Stone in MN then the Vikings did what I did: They "encoded" their message or they "encrypted" it. As it was common practice to chip off one name and then chisel in another the Vikings knew to 'hide' the information in plain sight; what seems to be redundant is deliberate and what seems so out of place is common - the hooked X. The manner in which this tablet is inscribed seems to match one place on Earth, a church. If you mistakenly factor in Native symbols or do not know about Chaco Canyon you'll be led to believe the Knights Templar mapped out thus claimed this land. No; look at the map made of stone that covers the entire area; if you plot it out it mimics the cross found at Chaco and the 'target' is the exacting location of the Kensington Stone.

You have a land claim and a deed - a written record - that you can trace back to a time when the Church was acting to raise money to then retake Jerusalem from the Muslims so you had the Crusades and a lot of political and religious upheaval. This led to the rise of the yeoman in Britain, the archers with long bows. It also led to the horse being used as a weapon of war as armies no longer traveled on foot. Europeans introduced the horse to America. Think: Leif Ericson comes and goes...you have a confluence of political and religious events that drives people from Central Europe to Portugal and to Got-land, that is now Sweden. They are not necessarily the same group; they share hallmarks but then do not as that's an illusion...the common denominator is Christianity, persecution and the hooked X - LIBERTY - only these libertarians seem to be composed of two groups - Vikings and Knights - when they are not.

VIKING is a VERB FORM; it means to go on a seafaring expedition; it meant pirates. Its feminine not masculine.

What you have is people who did not call themselves Viking as that's an action fleeing the consolidation of church and state! Pirating a treasure, you, away from the Church, lol. WHY this land? The prairie - they could graze sheep and if you can graze sheep then you are no longer owned by a king via taxation. Can you imagine the turmoil of the dark ages turning into the middle ages and people so used to deprivation and suffering as a way of life happen upon what we know of as the American prairie via following sacred knowledge they managed to pass down generation after generation by ACTING upon it?

Can you imagine how a person would feel seeing all of that largesse laid before them as if The God is the guilty culprit? How they would think about their own selves as a part of a larger universe as compared to one nation or one world?

"The assimilation of the nascent Scandinavian kingdoms into the cultural mainstream of European Christendom altered the aspirations of Scandinavian rulers and those Scandinavians able to travel overseas, and changed their relations with their neighbours. One of the primary sources of profit for the Vikings had been slave-taking. The medieval Church took the position that Christians should not own fellow Christians as slaves, so chattel slavery diminished as a practice throughout northern Europe. This took much of the economic incentive out of raiding, though sporadic slaving activity continued in the 11th century. Eventually, outright slavery was outlawed, and replaced with serfdom at the bottom rung of medieval society. Scandinavian predation in Christian lands around the North Sea and the Irish Sea diminished markedly."

According to the Kensington Stone what sounds like a surveying crew from the party that landed via ship not a land route, returned to find the camp had been slaughtered so it would be important for them to name it, bloodshed. The way the stone was handled and how it was interpreted caused us to make a mistake: the man who found it actually cleaned out the mud in the inscription with a nail - even a geologist said he was confused by these seemingly modern day scratch marks until a witness told him this. And: some Native American? I sent some of you a letter in which I told you about Hebrew matching another alphabet. Guess what? Hebrew seems to match some Native American petroglyph writing.

The Hebrew and Christian bible: King James means and intends MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS; that label is meant to trick you into circumventing the Church for a king thus switching out the New Testament for the old. Your authority becomes the Old Testament and you do not know it! Cause a faction by pitting your two daughters against each other as YOU, the king, won't be here and you get what you want. Who are the Scottish originally? RECENT HISTORY is:

In 1513, Henry invaded France and his troops defeated a French army at the Battle of the Spurs. His brother-in-law, James IV of Scotland, invaded England at the behest of Louis XII of France,[8] but failed to draw Henry's attention away from France. The Scots were defeated at the Battle of Flodden Field on 9 September 1513. Among the dead was the Scottish King, which ended Scotland's brief involvement in the war. On 18 February 1516, Queen Catherine bore Henry his first child to survive infancy, Princess Mary. (A son, Henry, Duke of Cornwall, had been born in 1511 but lived only a few weeks.)

Questions over what was the true faith were resolved with the adoption of the orthodox "Act of Six Articles" (1539) and a careful holding of the balance between extreme factions after 1540. Even so, the era saw movement away from religious orthodoxy, the more so as the pillars of the old beliefs, especially Thomas More and John Fisher, had been unable to accept the change and had been executed in 1535 for refusing to renounce papal authority. Critical for the Henrician reformation was the new political theology of obedience to the prince that was enthusiastically adopted by the Church of England in the 1530s. It reflected Martin Luther's new interpretation of the fourth commandment ("Honor thy father and mother") and was mediated to an English audience by William Tyndale. The founding of royal authority on the Ten Commandments, and thus on the word of God, was a particularly attractive feature of this doctrine, which became a defining feature of Henrician religion. Rival tendencies within the Church of England sought to exploit it in the pursuit of their particular agendas. Reformers strove to preserve its connections with the broader framework of Lutheran theology, with the emphasis on faith alone and the word of God, while conservatives emphasized good works, ceremonies, and charity. The Reformers linked royal supremacy and the word of God to persuade Henry to publish the Great Bible in 1539, an English translation that was a formidable prop for his new-found dignity.

You: skip over Jesus going to a king and then: GOD. OLD TESTAMENT. Thus royalty justifies the violence they exert against you, as its the Old Testament as the authority now. Calling it King James was meant to solidify Englands hold over both the British and Scottish thrones.

WHAT was going on in Scotland in the 1300's? A power play; a takeover by The Catholic Church: The death of Alexander III in March 1286, followed by the death of his

granddaughter Margaret, Maid of Norway, broke the centuries old succession line of Scotland's kings and shattered a two hundred year golden age that began with King David I. This led to the requested arbitration of Edward I of England who organized a process known as the Great Cause to identify the most legitimate claimant for the vacant crown. John Balliol was pronounced king in the Great Hall of Berwick Castle on 17 November 1292 and inaugurated at Scone, 30 November 1292, St. Andrew's Day. Edward I, who had coerced recognition as Lord Paramount of Scotland, the feudal superior of the realm, steadily undermined John's authority. In 1294 Balliol and other Scottish lords refused Edward's demands to serve in his army against the French. Instead the Scottish parliament sent envoys to France to negotiate an alliance. Scotland and France sealed a treaty on 23 October 1295, that came to be known as the Auld Alliance (12951560). War ensued and King John was deposed by Edward who took personal control of Scotland. Andrew Moray and William Wallace initially emerged as the principal leaders of the resistance to English rule in what became known as the Wars of Scottish Independence (12961328).The nature of the struggle changed dramatically when Robert the Bruce, Earl of Carrick, killed rival John Comyn on 10 February 1306 at Greyfriars Kirk in Dumfries. He was crowned king (as Robert I) less than seven weeks after the killing.

Robert I battled to restore Scottish Independence as King for over 20 years, beginning by winning Scotland back from the Norman English invaders piece by piece. Victory at The Battle of Bannockburn in 1314 proved that the Scots had regained control of their kingdom. In 1315 Edward Bruce, brother of the King, was briefly appointed High King of Ireland during an ultimately unsuccessful Scottish invasion of Ireland aimed at strengthening Scotlands position in its wars against England.

In 1320 the production of the world's first documented declaration of independence, the Declaration of Arbroath, won the support of Pope John XXII, leading to the legal recognition of Scottish sovereignty by the English Crown. THE 1362 deed followed!

Scotland never stopped warring in actuality; in the 16th century under James the VI Scotland is said to have reached its nadir as an independent nation. Co-dependent you mean as by then we were outta there... It's a fact: These people who came to the US

must have left Scotland during the wars Robert I began - they used that as their opportunity - or else they would not be here in 1362.

The Scottish and the Vikings merged into one. That's actual history. Account for: wanderlust as that's American. Account for star knowledge and common symbolism. Account for: guerilla warfare.

Most likely Natives observed these people and as Native Americans know its an either/or possibility and as these people are not the same as the Iroquois then if they had contact and it went awry or if Natives perceived them to be a threat then not only would Natives mark it in their language - symbols - but they would slaughter them. No Viking especially after the age of the Vikings passed would ever move through these woods and across this landscape like the Natives; Natives could and did often sit back and watch - as they were told to look for us. The Creator told them we would be coming. Natives knew what we were up to while we may not have even known we were being watched.

If you confuse Native America symbols with European ones then you would misinterpret this record in the US. Native Americans use a cross and a circle. They use what we know of as the Swastika and the Celtic cross; the swastika is the scales of justice which forms a circle when it moves or swings around so you see circles with crosses in them in Native America and if Natives saw ships coming emblazoned with the Iron Cross on them Natives would be fascinated as they would recognize it. Is a circle with a cross in it carved into a cliff or a boulder a Native record of this European landing or is it a European record? It most likely is a Native record.

Norse DNA? Lol: Recent research suggests that the Scottish warrior Somerled, who drove the Vikings out of Scotland and was the progenitor of Clan Donald, may himself have been of Viking descenta member of Haplogroup R1a1. Somerlad? He united the Scots and Vikings into one. By "driving out" the independent operators Somerland united us not them, lololol!

"Somerled first appears in historical chronicles in the year 1140[citation needed] as the regulus, or King, of Kintyre (Cinn Tre) when he marries Raghnailt the daughter of Olaf (or Amhlaibh), King of Mann and the Isles. The year 1153 saw the deaths of two kings: David I of Scotland and Olaf of Mann. There was much confusion and discord as a result and Somerled took his chancemaking offensive moves against both Scotland and Mann and the Isles, the latter having been inherited from Olaf by Somerled's brother-inlaw, Goraidh mac Amhlaibh. Was Somerland Scottish or Viking? Something else: Native Scot, related to Jews as Jews were the pictish native Scots.

A summoning was sent, from Thorfin the most powerful jarl of the Hebrides, to Somerled DougalSomerled's own son by his wife, the daughter of the Manx kingto move so he might be "King over the Isles". In 1156 Goraidh was defeated in battle against 80 ships of Somerled's fleet and the two enemies partitioned the isles between them. Goraidh kept the islands north of Ardnamurchan with Somerled gaining the rest. However, two years following this Somerled returned to the Isle of Man with 53 warships. He defeated Goraidh again and this time forced him to flee to Norway. Somerled's kingdom now stretched from the Isle of Man to the Butt of Lewis.

Thus both Viking and Scot formed one people under a single lord and came to share a single culture, one way of lifethey were to become a powerful and noted race known as the Gall-Gaidheal, literally meaning 'Foreign-Gaels'. It was upon the seas their power was situated under the rule of the Kings of the Isles yet new enemies arose in the east.

Following the death of Somerled several powerful lords emerged from within his kingdom. The lordship was contested by two main families; that of Somerled and his descendants and that of the descendants of Goraidh mac Amhlaibh. During the 12th and 13th centuries the Scandinavian world saw much change in methods of rule and administration which ultimately resulted in more strongly centralized, unified kingdoms such as Denmark and Norway. However, this did not happen in the Kingdom of the Isles, which was instead absorbed into the greater Kingdom of Scotland, albeit its place in that state and the loyalty of its inhabitants to the King of Scots would remain peripheral and temperamental for centuries to come.

In 2005 an unpublished study by Professor of Human Genetics Bryan Sykes of Oxford led him to the conclusion that Somerled has possibly 500,000 living descendants making him the second most common currently-known ancestor after Genghis Khan. He subsequently wrote that Roughly a quarter of Macdonalds, a third of McDougalls, and 40 percent of Macalisters are direct paternal descendents of Somerled ... it has been estimated that there are there are 200,000 men who carry Somerled's Y-chromosome as proof of their descent from the man who drove the Norse from the Isles.Sykes's research led him to conclude that Somerled was a member of the Y-DNA R1a1 Haplogroup, sometimes considered the marker of Viking descent among men of deep British or Scottish ancestry. Sykes' work has not been peer-reviewed."

Peer review: Correct! Ghengis Khan is it. Jefferson is R1a1.

ACTUAL SCIENCE: "Archaeologists recognize a complex of inter-related and relatively mobile cultures living on the Eurasian steppe, part of which protrudes into Europe as far west as Ukraine. These cultures from the late Neolithic and into the Iron Age, with specific traits such as Kurgan burials and horse domestication, have been associated with the dispersal of Indo-European languages across Eurasia. Nearly all samples from Bronze and Iron Age graves in the Krasnoyarsk area in south Siberia belonged to R1a1M17 and appeared to represent an eastward migration from Europe.

Geneticists believing that they see evidence of R1a1a gene-flow from the Eurasian Steppe to India have frequently proposed the involvement of these Steppe cultures in the process. Such a Steppe origin for all or part R1a1a continues to be argued on the basis of DNA results from ancient remains from several South Siberian late Kurgan sites, including some from the Andronovo culture. However, in recent discussions of this theory it is considered only to apply to a part of R1a1a, making this theory no longer incompatible with other origins theories for R1a more broadly defined."

POPULAR SCIENCE: "Bryan Sykes in his book Blood of the Isles gives imaginative names to the founders or "clan patriarchs" of major British Y haplogroups, much as he did for mitochondrial haplogroups in his work The Seven Daughters of Eve. He named R1a1a in Europe the "clan" of a "patriarch" Sigurd, reflecting the theory that R1a1a in the British

Isles has Norse origins. It should be noted that this does not mean that there ever was any clan or other large grouping of people, which was dominated by R1a1a or any other major haplogroup. Real clans and ethnic groups are made up of men in many Y Haplogroups."

Jefferson's DNA as R1a1a is a 'mutation':

The results of the 14 descendants are shown. Differences are highlighted with bold font. The five descendants of Field Jefferson (and proxies for Thomas Jefferson) have nearly identical Y-chromosome DNA alleles except for a single difference at J50. It is a reasonable assumption that this is a point mutation.

In addition to the Hemings controversy, the Jefferson male line DNA was of interest because it was found to belong to K2, a haplogroup that is rare for Europeans. Because of this, there was further study of the K2 haplogroup and its origins in the UK. The highest concentrations of the K2 haplogroup are today found among the people of the Middle East and Africa, but researchers believe the haplogroup originated in Asia. It is highest among the Fulbe peoples of West Africa. In lower concentrations, it appears in East Africa and in the Middle East.

Researchers wondered about the path of migration to produce small numbers of K2 individuals who came to reside in the UK and elsewhere in Europe. In 2007 King, et al. at the University of Leicester conducted DNA testing through a surname study of people named Jefferson. Testing 85 randomly selected men from the UK with the surname Jefferson, the team found that they could be classified by a number of different haplogroups. This suggested that the surname originated independently multiple times from different unrelated founders. (This is likely as the surname means simply Jeff's or Jeffer's son.)Two of the 85 men, with paternal grandfathers from Yorkshire and the West Midlands, respectively, and no known familial links to the USA, were found to belong to haplogroup K2. These two showed a perfect 17/17 match for STR values of the descendants of Field Jefferson. This shows that the rare haplotype existed among other men and families in England, so confirmed Jefferson's commonly accepted family origins there.

Researchers state that the background level of the K2 haplogroup (now called Haplogroup T) in the UK is typical of the random dispersal of small numbers of uncommon haplogroups throughout the world. It could have had any ancient origin of arrival in the UK. Given known migration patterns, some researchers think it possible that Jefferson had a Sephardic Jewish ancestor from Spain or Portugal, or an even more ancient ancestor in Europe with origin in Phoenicia or the Levant. Dr. Michael Hammer, a geneticist at the University of Arizona, found an exact match with this sample with a Moroccan Jew. Additionally, his database contained close matches with two other Middle Eastern Jews and an Egyptian.

"The haplogroup has probably been present for centuries in the 'indigenous' population of western Europe," says Professor Jobling (of University of Leicester), "and is not exclusive to the Middle East and Africa." According to limited data from commercial testing, of the European nations, men in Italy may have the highest frequency of haplogroup T, with as many as 3.9% of Italian males belonging to this haplogroup. Approximately 3% of Sephardi Jews and 2% of Ashkenazi Jews belong to haplogroup T.

Supporting evidence: The Haplogroup K2 may be part of the Jefferson male line DNA as Jefferson is said to be a spelling variant of the name Jephson. The Jephson surname's variant has been recorded as Gestson: Jephson is a name of Danish origin and Gestsson is an Icelandic viking name. The Vikings were known to have settled in Wales (where the tradition in Jefferson's father's family placed their origins) and have trade routes in Africa. I believe I know WHO my absolute proof is!

K2 DNA (LT) as K2 IS Jefferson: Haplogroup L is mainly found in South Asia. Haplogroup M is most prevalent in Melanesia. The NO haplogroup appeared ca. 35-40 ka in Asia. Haplogroup N probably originated in Mongolia and spread both east into Siberia and west, being the most common group found in Uralic peoples. Haplogroup O is found at its highest frequency in East Asia and Southeast Asia, with lower frequencies in the South Pacific, Central Asia, and South Asia. Haplogroup P gave rise to groups Q and R, and is rarely found in its undifferentiated stage. It probably originated in Central Asia or the Altai region.

Haplogroup Q also originated in Central Asia, migrating east to North America.

Marjory, Robert Is mother, actually did imprison the Brus until he married her: She knew they were both blood related to a Moramer thus were native and so any child would be 100% native so 100% royal via primogeniture and proximity of blood. I knew Jefferson had to be related to the Phoenicians and the Welsh and guess what? Ancient Scottish salvation history names exact Jews and a Pharoahs daughter as these people seemed to have traveled to Spain and met with the Phoenicians who told them about a destined land, land that was their destiny and fate which is: Scotland.

The reason the Cherokee and others seem to be related to Jews and so share exacting holidays and other common customs when that should be impossible according to DNA? At the time we were in the area we call The Tower of Babel or The Four Corners Story, where were we and what were we as we shared a common language and lived in harmony before we were sent to the four corners of Earth? We wereJEWISH! If you look in the Western US the written language you find on some petroglyphs matches the Hebrew. It is very, very cool as one scholar fully knowing he was not forcing it to fit actually found that if you write it backwards and forwards like a palindrome you still have the same meaning and intent! It works. It is. If you were not looking at the same language this would never happen. The symbols are only slightly changed. You truly are reading the ancient common language we once shared in the Old Testament.

Kids: At the time of the flood who and what were we? Jewish. You will find Judaism then in both the Cherokee and the Hopi as both cite the flood while the Hopi also cite the Tower of Babel (four corners). We then became Christian so you will find the chairoh, the P with an x through it, in Connecticut lending credence to St. Brendans account of history. The cross that symbol - appears in America before any Christian settlers of the actual Christian Church known as the RCC managed to remain. Jesus was a Jew; there was no Christian Church until the faker Constantine decided to stop tossing us to the lions and instead consolidate power. Christianity? It was: a form of government but nobody lives it out as originally intended!

The Kensington Runestone is an actual land claim and land deed that is supported by a staked out claim. This piece of land covers some of IL. This then is my physical land claim that is allodial that you can actually go see today as the markers are still in place and I have the compass used to mark it out. The Greeks used a building like a sundial to then discern a universal mean that was practical in size like a small compass. I have several compasses but the stone compass left by people who seem to be the Delaware is the one I can use to check this claim as it denotes a 180 degree flip in magnetic poles. The Kensington map, composed of words, is flipped 180 degrees as standing in Duluth, Minnesota in 1362 magnetic north would be below you. The hallmark on the Runestone is the hooked X. you find this exact hooked X in two places on Earth besides this stone. You find it in a church in Europe and: ON THE BROKEN HOPI TABLET! This stone is the missing piece of the Hopi stone as if you look you will find the Hopi have a hooked X in reverse! You find this in these 3 places on Earth only although we might find it in others someday. Now we have found it only in these 3 places and weve been looking - hard. Why in reverse? Think of that palindrome. Its a mirror image as if you are looking in a mirror. You are supposed to recognize your own self and so go through it like a window of opportunity. You are supposed to see yourself in all of these people. What is the name of a Hopi city in AZ?

WINDOW ROCK!

The truth of Americas national identity? WE ARE THE SEA GOING PEOPLE WHO SEEM TO BE DRIVEN TO EXERT WILL AND LIBERTY SO WE CAME HERE FROM ALL OVER EARTH; WE ARE THE PEOPLE THAT LOOKED AT THESE IMPOSSIBLE VOYAGES AND REASONED I CAN SO I WILL; WE SURVIVE TIME AND TIME AGAIN. WE WERE WILLING AS WE ACTED UPON THE PRMOISES MADE TO US BY GOD AS THOSE PROMISES ARE TRUE. AMERICAN IS A VERB FORM. AMERICA IS THE LAND NAMED BY DESTINY AND FATE, THE LAND NAMED IN THE STARS. WE ARE ACTUAL SAILORS, ACTUAL EXPLORERS AND DISCOVERERS, ACTUAL SCIENTISTS AND PHILOSOPHERS!

The greatest distance the Americans have traversed? Not to the moon.

The length, width and depth of the human heart.

268. I thus we own allodial title all ways possible. We never veered from the original thoughts, feelings, ideas and beliefs of our Founders and we own the oldest land deed that is also a staked out claim. The People do not need Obama to appear as we can have the debate with or without him and in this case we may need to due to a disability. [Early on in the campaign a Canadian joker fully knowing what is at stake asked me, Susan, if Barack Obama was only 3/5ths of a person; I told him, If you believe you are 3/5ths of a person then you are. Your personal truth seems to be self-evident. Trust us, this disability is global.] Also as we can claim ownership of the Iroquois Confederacy we do possess a document older than the Magna Carta that was then turned into the Mayflower Compact. We own title allodially every way possible as it just so happens that Cort Lindahl has a connection to William & Mary and I, Susan, have seen a stone related to the Magna Carta that I knew was reality authentic upon sight. This stone once rested in NYC. Im an eyewitness: The Flood? The Confederacy? The Vikings? The Magna Carta? Ponce De Leon? Jamestown? Saratoga? It happened.

269.

Something else happened too; its a case of something never happening yet we are denying reality and pretending it did happen: Article II and Amendment XII: does the third qualifier exist or not? I claimed I am placing it on the table; I am but if you confuse mathematical and philosophical induction and if you do not know formal, standard English then you might have missed the point of law. For our entire lives politicians and lawyers have told us that the Vice President and President must be from different states; is that true or not? Article IIs wording carried over to Amendment XII says, The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. To whom does themselves refer to, the Elector or

the VP and President? If you believe I was dictating law to you I wasnt; I was stating a seeming lie we have been led to believe as truth; if I dictated anything? I dictated opportunity by placing this on the table as Americans have acted insanely to make the claim they are from a state they are not to then be from different states. When I first entered the court I truly believed others understood I was leading you to this point of law as I stated I can diagram sentences, I am an intransitive verb and Never blindly believe anybody, not even me; always look it up for yourselves. English?

270. This is an example of a reflexive pronoun; a reflexive pronoun is usually used when the object of a sentence is the same as the subject; in this sentence the object and subject are the same: They, the electors, themselves. This clause reads NOT that you must be from a different state but that the elector must vote for two people and at one of these people cannot be from the same state as the Elector. Themselves refers to the Elector not to the persons on the ballot! [Note: another reason I truly believed the reader knew this? Think of issue and jurisdiction as being one and the same; thats reflexive! Im not contradicting myself but shifting language to reverse the injury as every voter is to reason law thus their vote. Im demonstrating symbolism and symbolic references; see the attached paper Franklin wrote on the symbolic nature of emblems. The mountain can come to Mohammed or Mohammed can come to the mountain; who cares as long as we meet upon our own will and liberty?] This is a federal question regarding exactly worded law.

271.

When I asked the state of FL a question about Electors, FL referred it to a special office in existence as of BVG and then to other experts or so I was told; it took a few days to answer my question and it was not answered fully. I believed it was a simple question with a simple answer and it is thus I was surprised and never forgot this; I told the person who answered me at last that I intended to bring this to federal court so he would not be blindsided as

he and then they were not wrong only mistaken plus was I asking about FL law or US law? Then I asked politicians the same questions and they panicked, failed to act and made an attempt to claim Article III, the piece of paper, prevented them from acting when in this case you may not cite Article III as we did it first and youre the paid Officer is in default and if you leave default one state is not suing the other state; its The People who are suing not the legal entity known as the State thus we are not pitting Governor against Governor in the federal court. So I knew: I hit the nail on the head. How did we ever come to believe that the President and Vice President had to be from different states? It also stipulates that to be the Vice President, a person must be qualified to be the President. Or: you must be natural born to serve as VP due to chain of command and common sense. Theres reasoning we came to believe what is not on the pieces of paper and never happened: We were conditioned. Politicians lied and carpet bagged some committed crimes to manipulate us - and we pretended it was perfectly legal; we defrauded and deluded ourselves via rationalization and justification. The People were made to feel powerless so they became powerless; then they participated. Also: we stopped teaching Latin in our schools, we stopped teaching children how to diagram sentences and we began to believe anything talking heads dictated to us over the TV while the FCC became politicized nepotism reigned thus it relaxed the rules and made decisions against our will until anything goes and it did. Today children BELIEVE it if its on TV and reporters like politicians choose their words very, very carefully so as not to be sued. Or so we allege.

272. We have sued Oprah Winfrey for everything she did such as hiring actors to play the role of her guests, supporting Obama and forming an LLC named Sophie after her dead dog to then buy a condo which she is reported to have given Gale King for her use when Gale King is her employee so its taxable income not a gift. We have seen a photo of this condo. Legal documents seem to support this as true. NY State changed the code of NY so you now form LLCs not co-ops to keep taxes and sex a secret. Oprah Winfrey told

us on her show that Gayle King does not like to accept gifts from her correct as theyre not gifts - and that the reason Michelle Obama was so oddly desperate to have Bill Ayers write the book Dreams of My Father as several people have testified to is:

273. The Obamas needed to buy land to establish a faux claim on the electorate, as if Barack Obama is a part of the electorate via home and so land ownership as the Obamas lived in a condo thus their name was not on any land deed. As if its possible that Barack Obama qualifies. Oprah herself told us this on her show. At first the testimony that Michelle not Barack seemed desperate did not make sense. Once we saw this condo in NYC that Oprah apparently owns via the LLC Sophie? Then Michelle Obamas desperation made sense as she would know all about sharecropping meant to keep you out of the electorate as Michelle Obama was born here. We are all renters via taxation every home owner is renting - but the condo and current taxation that accords the corrupted and criminally corrupt exemptions is a form of sharecropping and/or serfdom. Oprah overpaid for land in Hawaii; she and Donald Trump talked all about it on national TV a few years ago. Oprah announced that she was retiring at 25 years when Jimmy Carter appeared with Mattie Stepanek, long before the 25 year mark. WHO then did not know? Is Obama one of the 100 black men Oprah awarded a scholarship to or not? How did she miss this gem? We do not mean to be facetious; Oprah Winfrey herself opened the door to be exploited if she was exploited. Or so we allege.

274. Oprah has said her interest is not here but in South Africa. She has said she is vesting it there. She has said, the truth does not matter and I am afraid of the truth. A few pages into James Freys book, a book Winfrey enthusiastically supported as autobiography or as a form of 1st person history, you knew Frey was lying: Novocain is not an addictive drug; there are no Novocain junkies running around. There is no black market for Novocain. Rehabs take people to the dentist a lot as many people have done

drugs that cause tooth erosion such as meth. They do not have the opportunity to care for their teeth until they enter rehab and are no longer spending all of their money on drugs. James Frey wanted you to make a subconscious connection with dentists and cocaine as dentists can use cocaine is very small amounts. Personally, I do not know a dentist who uses it to pull wisdom teeth. Frey insists: He had to have his wisdom teeth pulled w/o Novocain. Did Frey ever set so much as his foot in the front door of a rehab or dentists office? Did Winfrey? Writer Stephen King has said he knew Frey was lying in these first few pages and that anybody could know if they wanted to know; King has said that people denied reality. 275. The skinny on Harvard square is: Oprah did not want to disturb her Hollywood friends who bought Freys book rights. Who was on her show soon after Frey but before someone exposed Frey? THE person who bought the book rights, Jennifer Aniston, or so it is reported. The class has not looked up the legal documentation of who owns Freys book rights. Oprah Winfrey had Frey counseling a woman and I watched as that man was going to kill someone as many people who are addicts believed him. People seem to have lost the ability to know the truth from a lie and the facts from the truth. Winfrey made this problem worse or so we believe. JAMES FREY IS ADDICTED TO EGO; SO IS MOST OF HOLLYWOOD. The truth is:

276. Hollywood Buddhism is what I, Susan, personally call Oprahs affliction; it is better known as theres no dogma in Buddhism so as Im a Buddhist and we have no dogma then Im not guilty. No dogma does not mean no guilt; no dogma means you do not believe in something without evidence and proof. Hollywood believes anything at all; Hollywood believes and advocates that you accept things on zero science and their word alone. Evidence and proof exists in their way so they deny reality; they fabricate the facts and do not distinguish fact from truth. Another name for it is FICTION: Oprah was never a victim of any white person. The Hermes store in Paris, France did not act as if they are racist towards Oprah. Oprah Winfreys assistant asked for special treatment and she was told NO and she did not like it so she objected to not

being able to violate the EP&DP clauses only as she looked black but in no way resembled Oprah Winfrey. Oprah herself told us this; she told us the facts as she knew them, wanting us to believe the truth is she was the victim of racism; she forgot that Sean Combs appeared on her show and told her that she needed to ask for special treatment when she went shopping and he said that hed give her lessons. Also the Hermes store cited constant precedent and a pattern not profiling. Obviously she took him up on the offer. The people who victimized Oprah were black and I my own self watched it happen once on her show as an absolute stranger who happened to be black called her a bitch seemingly w/o reason.

277. Oprah is driven to be a victim; she has to be black and you have to be white. See my world court suit as I know what her sense of self is; its inferior or so she believes; she was a baby and she vividly recalls acting and an adult stuck their tongue out at me. She is the cause; thats what your sense of self is; youre a cause for the first time ever. Nobody believes this fact of Oprah Winfrey which is an actual fact; its her history but nobody believes it. Its also her truth. The facts do not lead us all to the same truth; today you cannot tell people that fact is true but

its not your personal truth. Where reason meets emotion is different for all of usWinfreys biggest lie? Shes independent. No shes not, or so we allege. Today she is a slave, a slave to a lie she has been telling herself for decades. Like: The Equal Time Rules do not apply to her.

278. Your sense of self is not good or bad or right or wrong; its not inferior or superior. It is. Its up to you to consciously use it as your means; you deal with it. You can let it control you subconsciously and cry victim but that will get you know where fast, not even in France. You might be the walking dead if you are an American who cannot get ahead in France, the nation that LOST

their own revolution, rolled over for Hitler and who believes Jerry Lewis is a genius.

279. Oprah herself was never a slave; her ancestors? They bought land and parceled it off so several of them became a part of the electorate. No woman in Oprahs family ever had a baby that had a white father. If they were raped and it was an act of sex used as force they did not have any children. Trust me, everybody was raped but an act of sex is not always used if youre a man or if youre me. Its possible that her ancestors who are women were like me. Oprah? Oprah Winfrey has said the woman named Patricia is her sister: I DO NOT BELIEVE HER AS I BELIEVE DAUGHTER. I know Oprahs testimony is she lived with her grandmother at or around age 9 so sister supposed to be possible. I have plenty of reason to doubt her testimony regarding this relationship such as: Oprah has said she gave birth but the baby died however being age 14 when you give birth is not a reason and I have heard her testify as to what her father said; the finality she expresses is something I hear parents who give up a baby for adoption express as its like a death or its a form of death. I know one person who actually had a baby die that failed to thrive and no cause was found upon autopsy: my cousin. Every other time a cause was found, sometimes years later. My cousin not any doctor knew the baby had something wrong with her so she returned to the hospital as she had been released. Johns Hopkins could not name any cause. I grew up near Mary Beth Tinning who is said to have murdered several children and I took 1st person testimony from her neighbors as they were my neighbors family members so trust me: A baby just does not die without reason or cause. Neither does America. Oprah appeared on Henry Gates show about DNA so she might have a mistaken belief about DNA and Oprah has a fractured relationship with her mother. The DNA does not confuse us:

280. Oprah Winfreys DNA is 100% NONWHITE! Ask a geneticist: 80% non-white is considered to be very, very rare. I know of no other person who is 100% nonwhite and who is black or Negroid and who traces their ancestors to the period known as slavery in America. Oprah Winfrey is Negroid with a teeny, tiny percentage of Native American. She is zero percent white. Henry Gates made an attempt to tell her she had beaten odds in such an incredible way that you would not believe it unless you saw it unless you took her DNA or saw the land deeds but the truth of America was lost on her. Oprah believed her relatives were Zulu, Nobel Prize winning Zulus when that makes no geographic sense. She said as children they lied and claimed to be Native American not Caucasian but for her? That lie is the truth! I call this a larger than astronomical outcome as I said Viking to Susan Clemons and she said Yes, but when I proposed Wagner, Alfred Nobel or the brass ring she said No, an actual Viking. So I looked again; I beat Oprahs announcement to the punch by about a week; in an email I said, Oprah has a living relative and I believe its her child. Too bad if Oprah is afraid of the truth according to her own testimony as she did it and she knew as I served her. Oprah Winfrey is my absolute proof as she then is covered by every allodial deed or contract I possess including the one found within the LA Purchase and her DNA then is my genetic link to the first form we call human that arose in southern Africa. Recently an older discovery than Leakeys was made: A mother. Standing in America after traversing the universe I, Susan, am be able to reach back into time via Oprah Winfreys DNA.

281. Oprah Winfrey announced that she would no longer be accepting paper mail so I then served her on her own website issuing a cease and desist order that she ignored. Oprah Winfrey does not have an attorney in her employ that can enter SCOTUS on their own accord and directly so thus she is without reason or ration. She may not plead ignorant as she is not ignorant as to the terms concerning natural birth and today she holds court at the Whitehouse as if she won the election. She vicariously holds the Office like she vicariously received psychotherapy via her guests or so we allege. Oprah

Winfrey said she would never hold an office; she said, I am not willing. Then: do not force a candidate on us by purchasing the vote via tax fraud and people who do not qualify under the natural birth clause or the lying is inherently unconstitutional original intent thereby awarding our vote to a dead dog.

282.

When Jefferson bought LA he also bought a contract that sat on a shelf in Spain for 400 years. It was translated in 1905 and is within Navarros notes of the 2nd Expedition to Florida. Its allodial via royal land grant from a papal grant that then is sovereign. Did we buy the disputed portion of FL known as Pensacola or not for our extra money or did Jefferson do some creative cartography? Today we can know this with fractal geometry as you can use fractal geometry to model exacting maps. Did Andrew Jackson illegally seize Pensacola with force? Was FL ever a lawful state if it had no choice so no vote and now as its vote was stolen out from under it? Contract law is: YOU GET AT LEAST ONE OPPORTUNITY TO FULFILL A CONTRACT so then I and the class can act to fulfill US law and the contract we found in the LA Purchase. This then allows us to argue that America itself is an allodial title as The People then are it and are a sovereign entity, over the Earth. This contract overlaps or includes parts of the 1362 MN claim named in the Runestone. I, Susan, told NY State, the State that legally certified me Forever Pro Se: Do the meek actually inherit the Earth or is that only good on paper? I, Susan, will take NY in actuality and all the filthy lucre in its filthy coffers as theres no such thing as lucre.

283. What other state was taken by force and does not feel as if its citizens are American? HAWAII! I preserved Hawaiis argument by preserving Harlans dissent in the sugar cane monopoly case. Hawaii fell to a corporate coup so I do not feel sorry for Hawaiians as they should face Andrew Jackson first and then complain. Corporations took over Hawaii and later the Marines shot at them. Florida was over half slave when we were annexed and Jackson was

never ordered to shoot plus he hanged the British not the Spanish or the French or any escaped slaves or Natives when he raided Pensacola. Escaped slaves was the supposed reason. Sherman marched to the sea in Atlanta not Jacksonville as FL is like Hawaii: we are the states taken by force so we arent a state and part of America or so Fl feels. Hawaii has something we want too: Its name, its salvation history, the actual reality of spooky yet cool Hawaiian spirituality especially the Night Marchers who I met, the testimony of its citizens and a full body full frontal photograph of the closest living monkey relative we have as nobody who is human was ever a monkey and I can prove it.

284. We have a fossil of this lemur in a Museum that I entered. We do not have any other record of it and you cannot see how closely it resembles a human unless you look at this photograph. You can see the junctures on its skeleton that match human features. I knew I was looking at this lemur while the man who owns the photograph who is Hawaiian thought he was looking at a human skeleton. He saw: absolutes not the whole! He has two photos as one was taken while he was cliff diving and it shows a cross; where his body in a tucked position should then cast a like shadow instead you see a cross as plain as day. So obvious is this that a tourist sent it to him when they had their film developed. He never thought much about it until he went to put away a photo that he took when a waterfall laid a cliff bare; usually this cliff is never dry as a waterfall flows over it but during a drought the waterfall completely dried up so he took a quick photo. As he went to put the pictures away this one fell and so tipped 90 degrees and he could see: A mans skeleton seemingly standing along the horizon now vertical. Held and viewed normally he never noticed this. Seeing the whole I never would have thought human until he hit each human mark.

285. I, Susan, know all about Hawaii as Hawaii fought to claim me via college scholarship when my mother told Hawaii the truth: If you get Susan then

youll be sorry as she deliberately scored this low on the SATS as she is a genius; I am telling you that she is an actual genius so she did this on purpose thus if you get Susan you will be sorry as it will be as if you have no idea what hit you. You are asking for trouble. What kind of kid deliberately flunks out of college BEFORE she ever gets there? I am telling you that I know my own kids and Susan is no angel. Thus Hawaii, the state university, fought my mother for about 2 hours as: No other parents were telling the truth about their angelic little prince and princess like spoiled brats. Every kid was a genius and a saint except me and in my case THE EXPERT AUTHORITY on Susan, my Mom, was testifying.

286.

I, Susan, did deliberately score low on the SATS as I was sick to death of all this talk about a permanent paper record that followed you forever and made the difference between life and death. Our entire legal presupposition as a nation is sovereignty is no paper needed. Our legal claim to exist is A Summary View; if I cant trust and believe in Thomas Jefferson then who can I believe in? Throwing the SATS was an act of faith on my part as what I believe in is America. I would have scored under 1000 but I did not think of it until half-way through the test as it was the PSATs. I never took the SATs. The Founders wrote US law in INDELIBLE not permanent ink; permanent ink and permanent record are the inventions of corporate, post 1871 America. So is the lie that has now harmed at least 3 generations of children: If you graduate from college you will earn a million dollars more than your counterpart. College is not a guaranteed ticket to success and if you hire a person only as they went to college then you have not hired the best person for the job and maybe you hired a person who cant do the job. College is not for everybody; not everyone wants to go or needs to go and not everyone is chasing paper money. If all college is doing is obsessing over the appearance of the paper? Why go? Ask: Who endows colleges and universities? Its the same names and the same corporations over and over. Im already endowed and so is the class that actually graduated from

SCOTUS. What permanent record? Youre supposed to re-invent and lose yourself in America.

287.

Harvard, the diploma mill that awarded Obama a degree when he cannot argue law as the ability to deduce things let alone reason them or to think in theoretical terms is not his, and who perpetrates the myth of the permanent record and a hierarchal class system in the US, is this nations first corporation. Harvard unlike William & Mary will not be securing allodial title anytime soon. The class of Petitioners is not afraid of Harvard. Alan Dershowitz works for Harvard. If we name Alan Dershowitz who claims to be the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law then we have a reasonable expectation that a response from Dershowitz will be forthcoming as we have heard some incredible original intellectual property come from Dershowitz. We have no such expectation where Obama is concerned although they both supposedly graduated from law school. How did both men graduate? It is Alan Dershowitz who led me to BVG & what lawyers could not do, reason moral authority, as he said this about Paul Stevens: He said that in his, Stevens, BVG opinion that Paul Stevens is a liar and should be hanged as a criminal that was the general sentiment as he did not literally say this - as Paul Stevens opined upon an issue not before the courts; Dershowitz said: Paul Stevens is wrong because Stevens claimed, THESE LAWYERS ARE LYING.

288.

Every judge and every lawyer alive knows you can and may rule upon an issue not before the court if you know it is present. It is entirely dependent upon all fact including the nature of the issue, why nobody is saying theres a 5 ton constitutional elephant in the room and who is before you and why. The issue is present as the case is before you. BVG is one of those cases. Dershowitz wrote that you, a judge, cannot and may not do this. Ever as in never. Dershowitz put words in Stevens mouth. It was as if he had drawn a little word balloon over Stevens name on the opinion. As if he, Dershowitz, can dictate the truth of Paul Stevens and US law to us. Most Americans truly

believe Dershowitz claims about Stevens as they want and need to explain BVG away. Dershowitz said that Paul Stevens opinion calling a lawyer a liar is itself a crime. Did Paul Stevens call a spade a spade in his BVG opinion? I myself burst out laughing as I know Dershowitz and I know the Paul Stevens Rule of Law:

289. Paul Stevens said that he can and will believe it if The People tell it to him, that anything The People say he can consider. He said, Its the things you tell me in your official capacity as a Supreme Court Justice that I cant believe. I, Susan, have a rule which made the class laugh as its true: I can and will believe it if you tell it to me as a Supreme Court Justice; every wacky thing a Supreme Court Justice tells me I can and will consider. Its the things Americans tell me that I dont believe. I cant believe a lawyer believes that.

290.

Alan Dershowitz like Obama truly believes he is Jason and has stolen the golden fleece (look up the ARGOSY BOOKSTORE as Dershowitz claims to have bought an unpublished Jefferson letter from the Argosy in NYC at auction). Dershowitz may not turn in a very good argument regarding why we call a diploma a sheepskin or why we call a condom a lambskin or how he is arguing semantics but came to be faulted for being anti-Semitic or so Jews allege but the class reasonably expects that Dershowitz can and will turn in something on paper and that he can support his argument in person and it will not sound half bad to the expert Officer of the Judiciary who is also a lawyer. Alan Dershowitz can respond or answer or argue or dictate as he has the human ability but Obama cannot. Its unfathomable that both men hold law degrees from the same school law school - or that they worked for the same school Harvard - unless you account for the denial of liberty, the logic error on the LSATS that may not have appeared when Dershowitz took them and the prejudice against women. Or so we allege.

291. How do we know as fact that Obama cant reason constitutional law, not even to twist it? EASY: a judge told us. It is reported that Obama argued one case, a case in which he would not be in front of anyone but a single judge or a panel of judges. He wouldnt be arguing in person but reciting other peoples work that he memorized or by reading it from the pieces of paper. It would not be unique and it would not be his. If that Law Review case is his? Read it; all he did was cut n paste other peoples work. How hard does he work to run from the courts over natural birth? IN PERSON is the key, as he believes he kept a secret that he did not, that he has hidden something from a judge. He did not hide it from me. The judge Obama appeared before is reputed to be notoriously tough on lawyers, professional lawyers. Personally I want and need my judges to be notoriously tough on lawyers and on me. The pro se? They represent themselves; I cannot think of any occasion you would need to be tough unless they made their case and will be moving on to SCOTUS. Lawyers? They have a job to do and they have clients or they have victims. You never learn but by doing it yourself in person and that is why Obamas utter lack of legal experience is so disturbing as is his absolute refusal to subject himself to the EP&DP clauses. Im certain that Obama wants us to believe this judge went easy on him because they went to the same school as everyone says but check the record: What are the odds that Obama landed before a judge he went to school with they went to the same school not necessarily at the same time the one and only time he ever argued live? Why is his name listed as an attorney of record several times over if he never, ever argued but one time? What if I know something about manipulators that this judge does not and that wouldnt even be an idea in this judges head? Read the record. What if this judge made an attempt to question Obama and found out that he couldnt and so backed off as he did not want to humiliate him? What if this judge was told Obama is a genius and so as he couldnt reconcile what he was experiencing with what he had been told he, the judge, chalked it up to nerves or to some people not being able to argue orally when in reality all Obama did was read from a piece of appear or recite something he had memorized? What if Obama seemed to be spontaneous so the judge believed he is? A very good

manipulator can do this in such a way you would never think he wasnt spontaneous unless you knew something that I know via life experience. When you read a transcript can you see what Obama is holding? Can you hear the emotion in his voice? Can you tell if he reciting something? What is he wearing? In a transcript you read the words said out loud. Thats it. I looked: I do not believe this judge did what he is accused of doing; I believe as Obama CANT argue orally (no manipulator of the type Obama is can; see the videotape of Obama and fat cat bankers as Obama cant function w/o paper in front of him THAT HAS WORDS ON IT) that Obama pulled a stunt that a manipulator tried to pull on me but it didnt work in my case. As the appearance is so good, they went to the same school and it seems as if the judge did go easy on Obama, people especially lawyers blame the judge not Obama as one thing lawyers cant figure out?

292. That Obama was passed ahead over and over like the star football player when he cant think theoretically or argue law. Once all anyone cares about is money and celebrity then this becomes possible. Lawyers cannot reason how Obama achieved or why as what they cannot reason is how judges could seemingly go along with this and then deny cases hearing when people sue to expose the truth. Most lawyers want to know the truth or so they tell me even if they do not want you to know it. Most lawyers tell me that their professors were not so easy on them. Most lawyers do not have this personality type. As this seems to be a giant sized conspiracy, is it? No as all Obama and his mother and father did is take advantage of opportunity others created for them. Why did this escape most Americans at first? Because: If you deny the citizens liberty then eventually they no longer believe in God as they no longer have any proof of God. No proof of life. Liberty, part of the godspark, is an emotion you experience. The Voters were denied justice absolutely at long last having never felt liberty.

293. Barack Obamas self-described half-sister testified to this: She said that Obamas mother would constantly say to him that he had to become the Executive; that her love thus his life depended upon it. Obamas half-sister said that when she makes an attempt to tell others this they believe she means his mother said it as a joke; she says NO, Dunham said it seriously and a lot of the time. Exactly: Its like brainwashing; its a tactic Chinese and Soviet communists and/or atheists use on their victims. Dunhams problem? Self-hatred just like her son. She denied her son liberty as if you have to lie and so you are conditional then its not law and its not liberty. You become the condition.

294. Stanley Ann Dunham was supposed to be a boy or so her father told her. She claimed to have gotten over that injury; no, she spent the rest of her life trying to dump her hatred on us as she blamed America for the sorry life she lived. If her father was a communist? So was she; she wanted him to love her and be proud of her. If America is racist? Then she would date black men exclusively; a classmate said she targeted black men only. If America is just? Shell reign down injustice. If America is God-loving? Then she was an atheist. Any thing she could do to prove America is bad and defective she did. In a very, very sick way she is harming her mother to prove her love for her father and she chased that her whole life never escaping self-hatred. She is the person who taught her son how to sneak around in life and that there are no consequences as if fundamental, universal laws were somehow suspended for her, a destroyer god. All you have to do is check the facts of her life as a pattern emerges as it always does. Unique people leave unique fingerprints. Obama has left a unique fingerprint on the record as its his actions that prove him. Or so we allege.

295.

Barack Obama is not qualified to hold the Office of the Executive and knew so before he ran; this is proven by his own words and actions and US history as not only does he claim his father was born in Kenya thus is not natural

born but Bush V Gore sat as a tied ruling of the Supreme Court until Susan Herbert, in defense of herself and The People, broke this tie in her favor by testing Marbury and winning as Herbert entered SCOTUS directly as an authority case of original jurisdiction.

296. Fathers make you legal or President as fathers signed the paper while mothers make you moral or Commander as mothers gave birth to you. My natural born American father signed two pieces of paper that rise to the level of proof: My birth certificate and my baptismal record, a rite performed at St. Patricks much to my delight as: I am driving the snakes out of America. This then caused me to sign my personal bound copy of The Constitution once I toppled the 1871 version thus Im an actual signer; I signed in my own name and I signed in Jeffersons and Adams names as they were not present at the Convention. You, whoever you are, might let Obama clown around on my dime and my blood but will you let him stomp all over Jefferson and Adams? Its the Founding Fathers and the Patriotic Mothers not the Founding Foreigners:

297. According to US law and case law and according to actual reality a persons father must be natural born in order for you to legally qualify for the closest thing we have to an entitlement, a birthright known as Office of the President and Commander. Physical birth merely qualifies you for the benefits of citizenship that are based upon tax apportionment decided via the vote thus your mother qualifies you for the benefits, a vote, while your father qualifies you for the entitlement, a birthright. I guess Dan Quayle is correct after all: Fathers ARE important!

298. Obama states he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii. If that is the case, he was a British citizen at birth because his father was a citizen of the protectorate of British East Africa. Because the region had, in 1961, not yet declared its

independence from Great Britain, Obama was, like his father, a British citizen under Section 32(1) of the British Nationality Act of 1948. Both Obama, Sr. and Obama, Jr. then automatically became citizens of Kenya when that independent nation was formed in 1963. Obama jr. claimed Britain not Kenyan as his father did. Obamas British/Kenyan citizenship automatically expired when he turned age 21, but he was born with dual citizenship and split loyalties, and thus was not a natural born citizen of the United States. Obama himself on his own website claimed he held dual citizenship with Great Britain, a concept that is nonexistent under US law. There is zero provision for dual citizenship. This concept is alien to the Constitution.

299.

Naturalized citizenship: Obamas American citizen parent, Stanley Ann Dunham, had to have been a resident of the United States for 10 years, at least five of which were over the age of 14. Dunham did not meet that requirement (of the Nationality Act of 1940, revised June 1952) until her 19th birthday in late November of 1961, almost four months after Obama was born. The law confers U.S. nationality on a child born outside the United States only under certain circumstances, including: (7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States, who prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years. Thus, if Obama was not a natural born citizen, he was not even a citizen of the United States. I have found copies of certificates said to be Obamas Kenyan birth records and they may be but I have also found a vault copy of what I believe or allege or propose are Obamas records in Canada.

300. Kenya itself made Obama choose loyalties upon its independence from Great Britain. See the Kenyan Nationality Act as Obama had to choose British or

Kenyan citizenship and he, Barack Obama, chose British citizenship; also, to attend school in Indonesia as Barack Obama did you had to be a citizen of Indonesia and so it seems Obama may have held Indonesian citizenship at one point, or, lies were told so Indonesian officials believed he was a citizen. Just as important is the fact that while Obamas mother claimed to be an atheist Obama was said to be Muslim as you had to be Muslim to attend school in Indonesia as they have a state religion. Obama himself claims to be Christian. Barack Obama has spent a lifetime changing his spots, becoming whatever he needed to be in the moment to manipulate you in order to secure the benefits unjustly and without earning them; he has spent a lifetime actively and openly violating the EP & DP clauses. If you have never once lived what you claim to believe then you do not have the human ability to enforce The Constitution nor to accord anyone justice. It is as Plato stated Socrates taught him in The Allegory of The Cave: How can a man who has never known justice then accord justice to another? In this case foreignization of the Executive is meant to forever prevent WOMEN from securing EP &DP under the law. It is meant and intended to deny them their birthright. Its is also meant and intended to deny ethical men access to the Offices of legal power as a consolidation of power had already occurred by the time Obama was unlawfully installed.

301.

In this case you never need to see a Hawaiian birth certificate as not only do the litigants stand on US V Nixon, BVG and then In Re Susan Herbert I & II (see Brown I &II) but all any Hawaiian birth certificate establishes is that it is possible Obama is qualified to vote as he may not be as demonstrated above. He may have been committing voter fraud all of these years. You never need to establish Obamas father is not a natural born American as it has been proven absolutely already Obama changed his name from Sotero to Obama to then claim his African birth, stated this publicly and never once denied this fact - and the piece of paper produced by officials working with Obama and/or the Democratic Party reads Obamas father is African not American, a fact no person on Earth has once disputed.

302. We have disputed the word African as at the time Obama is said to have been born? We used the word Negro and Negroid. This document is missing the word transcript plus if you read my original COLB from 1967 it clearly reads this is proof of your age and citizenship NOT natural birth. The word citizenship means the vote, you can cast a vote not sit and act as the President and Commander. I sent to NY for a copy of my long form birth certificate as I had never seen it; it does read transcript or its exact. I have looked at other HA COLBS and birth certificates and then one from other states; I have seen nothing like the COLB Obamas reps presented as they do read Negro and Negroid if they are from that era. My birth cert would never, ever read Irish American. We do not issue birth certs reading Italian American and the like for this reason: Race is not a religion nor a nationality nor a continent. Its not your choice; it is. Youre human and youre American; race is a genetic marker. I happen to know something about race and legal designations so I have attached a listing of various legal designations for races; here is an excerpt. Note the phrase self identify:

In more recent times, about 1000 CE, interactions between black people and Arabs resulted in the incorporation of extensive Arabic vocabulary into Swahili, which became a useful lingua franca for merchants. Some of this linguistic exchange occurred as part of the slave trade; the history of Islam and slavery shows that the major juristic schools traditionally accepted the institution of slavery.[25] As a result, Arab influence spread along the east coast of Africa and to some extent into the interior (see East Africa). Timbuktu was a trading outpost that linked west Africa with Berber, Arab, and Jewish traders throughout the Arab World. As a result of these interactions many Arab people in the Middle East have black ancestry and many black people on the east coast of Africa and along the Sahara have Arab ancestry.[26] Kenya is in East Africa.

According to Dr. Carlos Moore, resident scholar at Brazil's Universidade do Estado da Bahia, Afro-multiracials in the Arab world self-identify in ways that resemble Latin

America. He claims that black-looking Arabs, much like black-looking Latin Americans, consider themselves white because they have some distant white ancestry.

By that time, the majority of black people were U.S.-born, so use of the term "African" became problematic. Though initially a source of pride, many blacks feared its continued use would be a hindrance to their fight for full citizenship in the US. They also felt that it would give ammunition to those who were advocating repatriating black people back to Africa. In 1835 black leaders called upon black Americans to remove the title of "African" from their institutions and replace it with "Negro" or "Colored American". A few institutions however elected to keep their historical names such as African Methodist Episcopal Church. "Negro" and "colored" remained the popular terms until the late 1960s.[41]

The term black was used throughout but not frequently as it carried a certain stigma. In his 1963 "I Have a Dream" speech,[42] Martin Luther King, Jr. uses the terms Negro 15 times and black 4 times. Each time he uses black it is in parallel construction with white (e.g., black men and white men). With the successes of the civil rights movement a new term was needed to break from the past and help shed the reminders of legalized discrimination. In place of Negro, black was promoted as standing for racial pride, militancy and power.

In 1988 Jesse Jackson urged Americans to use the term African American because the term has a historical cultural base.

Hamilton would disagree as he was from the French Caribbean but would not self-identify with African or French or Caribbean and my friends son has an father from Ghana and he is black not African. Socio-political constructs should not be interpreted as scientific or anthropological. Anwar Sadat remarked, "I am not white but I am not exactly black either. My blackness is tending to be reddish". I said that too; I said I'm an apple Indian but in reverse, lol. Someday? Well be caf au lait. Self-identity is I am not a

genetic marker. In the US? White, black, Italian etc. is an experience of life you have.

303.

As Obama claimed dual British citizenship The People have asked Great Britain to produce a written statement from Obama in which he severs all ties to Britain and divests himself of any titles of nobility exactly as John Lennon authored and entered and so far no person has been able to produce one. It does not seem to exist. Marbury is your action is the proof; you may not passively renounce your allegiances you mat not wither on the vine and ideally you are allegiant to one alone so that is the reason the natural birth clause exists. See Lennon V US as John Lennon actually wrote to the Queen renouncing his British citizenship and any titles of nobility. John Lennon is zero point; he not Obama holds this place.

304.

This, the case for natural birth, is the test of Marbury and A Summary View is the most extraordinary legal case in all of world history. It begins in the Supreme Court and ends at the Supreme Court thus establishing the body of case law known as American common law as we are no longer dependent British common law. Three dates stand out: January, February and March of 2010, 1), the State of the Union Address whereby Obama convened what is best described as a court of admiralty and a civil conviction 2), the US Marshall coming to my home and personally delivering a threat Obama made against my life instructing me that I was not ever to tell the truth in federal court again or Id go directly to prison which is good as now DC is a foreign city state like the Vatican City, an independent foreign nation, and as the federal court clerks in Sioux City warned me by deliberately misfiling my complaint under a prisoners motion as Obama first threatened them publicly see the attached and then 3), Roberts objection to the political climate making him the legal Chief Justice as he upheld his oath by acting in defense of The People.

305. You might want to account for one more date, the date Obama answered a question about healthcare with the words Louisiana Purchase and earthquake as that is found in my lawsuit only its unique and Sioux City issued what is a ransom note for Earth while Obama and Congress issued one for America as think of healthcare like the Congress suspending your vote and then asking you for money against your will and when everyone knew it is unlawful and when Pelosi challenged us to sue her. VA, home of Jefferson, just overturned Obamacare. Obama could only say those words he said in that context if he knew the fact and law contained in my suit; or, he absolutely had to participate in the decision to threaten me as its science I can easily prove known as chain of command and an actual Freudian slip as a Freudian slip happens on such a deep level the person who makes it or says it does not know it. I checked with Harvard Medical: Its an actual Freudian slip. Obama cannot so much as establish hes a lawful voter let alone qualified to be president thus 60,000,000 voters can be and are wrong as ignorance may not be an excuse but it might be a reason if you need the life experience to then know, becoming wise to the errors of your ways. Or so we allege.

306.

This is because The American Founders great experiment ended at Bush V Gore. I knew it so I acted. Marbury and now this case are life and death honor bound safety issues or points of law so fundamental they are elemental. Exactly as Marbury created the venue this case creates the venue for if no venue exists then what you are stating is the United States of America does not exist as liberty and justice is made impossible. If liberty and justice is not possible? Why waste your life acting as a lawyer as each time you make the attempt you will not secure justice? Why cast a vote? Why fight a Revolution? Or: What is the point to ever being born why bother existing - if you will never, ever secure the benefits known as the blessings of liberty?

307.

I, Susan, knew BVG opened a door or rather opened a door that was already there widest. Its as if the pyramid tipped allowing for the most liberty and including everyone as in America its all a pyramid scheme; thats how corruption and crime is always endemically realized, as a pyramid or Ponzi scheme. Theres nothing to fear as this is the natural order of the universe. This door exists due to Marbury V Madison, as Thomas Jefferson, like me, understood this door existed since Eve ate the apple in Eden and that Jesus demonstrated how to open it and then walk through it like a master locksmith. This door was then enshrined in The Declaration, Federalist Papers and The Constitution, the greatest feat of engineering on Earth. Only one thing remained: A volunteer needed to show the citizens how to turn human work into human endeavor or how to go from being self-realized to self-actualized and so with every piece perfectly in place Adams, Hamilton, Marshall, Madison and Marbury Thomas Jefferson acted, causing a chain reaction. He dropped an atomic bomb thus our one, lone vote became actual not merely a worthless piece of paper or not merely real on paper. People not paper and so action became our proof. He turned the thoughts, feelings, ideas and beliefs made real on pieces of paper into actual reality as Marbury makes the Chief Justice thus the lone natural born voter equal in legal power to the President thus a citizen can and may wield their vote as an Executive Order. He did so by creating the venue, as the venue is these men who are The People or are the constitutionally set government. I laughed when I found out Jesus said whatever you do, do not go to the lawyers and I laughed harder when lawyers told me Marbury thus the Justices and so all lawyers including their own person are anti-constitutional as claiming Marbury is unconstitutional allows them to be lazy, commit crimes and get paid whether they produce or not. Lawyers then place blame upon the Justices for their own sorry performances or lies. Or so we allege.

308. See Scalias book telling the corrupted to look him in the face when they lie and not to read verbatim from other peoples briefs as he couldnt figure out what he was experiencing when these liars appeared so he wrote a whole

book that sounds like such a simple how to guide even a reporter laughed. In that interview Scalia said they cant look at him or wont look at him and that they do not enter unique property or even their own; that they are reading the briefs and other documents verbatim via reciting it when the Justices have read it already. This is why Im not hitting you over the head with law or case law as you know it and as we do not have to memorize the truth. Or so we allege.

309.

Marbury V Madison did not create what was not already there to begin with. The possibility of a military and/or religious extremist dictator rising existed in the continuum between President and Commander. This is obvious or selfevident as Washington is a Commander who rose to legal power via a war and John Adams conferred the power to Command not Preside upon Washington who because of illness conferred it upon Hamilton thus creating a situation whereby Hamilton could have become a dictator or a king. As war with France was averted the official title and the actual power to Command was restored to Adams as that is moral authority or will. Another name for moral authority is vertical checks. The two Offices were reunited in Adams as HE averted war. The power to Preside is legal power or liberty and is horizontal checks. Marbury merely made an oligarchy possible, with an oligarchy realized as an aristocracy of lawyers being most possible or most likely to occur as judges usually train as lawyers. Thus then in the US, once an oligarchy is realized, you would have corruption turned criminal, as this cant happen any other way, as you have to overthrow The People. The oligarchy is realized at BVG; The People are overthrown by manipulators and predators who are mostly lawyers; it then goes past completion becoming criminal corruption. Or so we allege.

310.

As lawyers are Officers of the Judiciary but lawyers deny this reality you would have this oligarchy rising out of our courts beginning with our most fundamental court: family court, the very court Thurgood Marshall names in

Lassiter as fundamental. It would rise as The People rose filling these offices and eventually land in the Supreme Court pitting the Chief Justice against The President who is supposed to embody The People once the venue existed as a court of constitutional authority as every court is such a court but every person had to act unethically and/or immorally for this to occur. Thus SCOTUS would be pitted against The People so to become a dictator like Hitler a puppet all one has to do is sneak an authority case past SCOTUS w/o testing Marbury so you could reason Presidential election would be the case and I did around age 10. My brother Kevin gave me this idea: TIED SCOTUS RULING SO THE PRESIDENT CALLS IT. What about corruption and/or criminal intent on the part of a President? A people would call it, one, lone voter. My father said he could not imagine what case I might have but if that is my case then Im the President not the Commander as to get there FIRST you would act as Commander and then President. A uniformed soldier would act as President first and then Commander, the opposite like a double helix. I reasoned that my own self. The Founders provided for this event; the provision is Marbury V Madison, fundamental, natural, universal law NOT merely case law. I myself knew test of Marbury; thats what my father couldnt imagine as hes a man not a woman and Marbury was a man as was Thurgood so Im Browns daughter all grown up: INDEPENDENT!

311. My mothers maiden name is Brown.

312.

I, Susan Herbert, parked the US Military at or within SCOTUS, by directly entering the Supreme Court of the US upon a claim of constitutional authority and original jurisdiction with Petition 07-9804. While it may seem as if entry was not direct based upon the false appearance of the docket it is direct as a point of law so fundamental it is elemental arose after I first entered federal court. A federal judge who is a lawyer and is a manipulator who does have criminal intent as he told me he did acted to harm me, a

fellow judge named Henry Adams, John Roberts exactly and so the Chief Justice exactly and then the entire US Military; upon Henry Adams, the other involved judge, lawyer and voter, informing me that not one person in the US knew what Bush V Gore is or said, the point of law changed as I entered the federal court knowing clerks of the Supreme Court were committing crimes so serious and so heinous they escalated to treason or so it seems.

313.

Henry Adams, at that time a sitting federal judge, had issued a ruling in which he named the Supreme Court exactly, stating it will not let you in. This ruling is on the court record. It was published. Upon being informed that no person, not one judge and maybe not any of the Justices as Rhenquist had died by then, knew what BVG is or says the point of law changed to: NATURAL BIRTH thus ORIGINAL JURISDICTION but like this: If the venue will never exist due to criminal corruption in the Supreme Court clerks office perpetrated without any relief as the Chief Justice does not know he is a victim, and the sitting President is participating with full knowing, then what is the point to acting as a lawyer? If liberty and justice are made impossible you have wasted your life acting as a lawyer; you have wasted your life acting as a voter; you have wasted your life acting as an American and a human being so why bother existing? Why ever be born in a war or why bother being born at all?

314. If you go to Why bother being born at all? you are: blaming The Creator and as Im not delusional I will never go here as the clerks of SCOTUS who are lawyers are not The God although they suffer from the god delusion. The God delusion is not believing in God but coming to believe as if its law that you are God; you then deny this; you either claim to believe in God but do not or you are an actual atheist so you have no ethic but say you do; you act as if you can do anything at anytime to anyone and there are no consequences for you alone. You place blame and you condition others with fear; you are nothing but a glorified bully, a bully with a title. At least two

clerks of the Supreme Court are under the God delusion: Danny Bickle, Stay Clerk and William Suter, the Chief Clerk or so it seems. The God delusion aka Ego Redux makes all appearances deceptive. Or so we allege.

315.

It is fact of my life that the Chief Clerk, William Suter, spoke to me in February 2007 and asked me to qualify myself before he sent me the rules of the court. He made an attempt to tell me SCOTUS is special. No, its not: Marbury. What did Marshall say? Come on back if this ever happens. Or so we allege.

316.

He said, Im not sending you the rules! and slammed the phone down. I, Susan, burst out laughing as I usually do as: A SCOTUS clerk and I tested Marbury; I cited Marbury and in a case whereby the qualification for natural birth to then sit and act as the Executive are at stake and when Marshall said if the denial of the piece of paper becomes the violation of the right itself so come back, Will just: DENIED ME THE PAPER RULES IN AN ATTEMPT TO DENY ME THE PROTECTION OF THE CONSTITUTION THEREBY DENYING EVERY AMERICAN SAID PROTECTION, EVEN FEDERAL JUDGES AND EVEN JOHN ROBERTS THE CHIEF JUSTICE AS NOTHING BUT NOTHING MAKES YOU IMMUNE IF THE PROCESS DOES NOT EXIST. It matters not why; if theres no process as it is a brand new issue, a never before heard point of law, or if the process exists but your right is denied you, or if a person with criminal intent or who is a manipulator is violating your right thus annihilating the process then nobody is immune. If it happens within SCOTUS? A dictator has arisen as that dictator would be: William Suter who has been abusing and controlling the process. Or so we allege.

317. Absolute proof would be David Souter, a former Justice, who in a PAC case ruling, asked what is wrong? This is the same exact case 4 times over; who is sending this ahead and why are other Justices hearing it? Correct, as the

very definition of insanity is doing the same exact thing over and over expecting different results; Souter said it would never change as law wouldnt change and its the same exact case. So then, clerks had to send it ahead and what fantastical summaries were they writing as they are delusional as I independently confirmed? Why are they so hot to protect and promote other lawyers, so hot they were now inflicting this injury on the Justices? Based upon Souters advice I pulled all four cases captions, the captions only. They ARE exactly the same; what are the clerks who are EXCLUSIVELY male in this case and may be exclusively male in that office and who are lawyers focusing on? Why are they trying to force a bad case ahead? WOMEN. And guess what? I happen to be THE PAC case. The PAC I argued? Wal-Mart acquiesced! We did not need to enter a courthouse as I mailed it to them. Im not against Wal-Mart as Wal-Mart and indeed all of corporate America is people. I have an issue with all PACS but theirs came to harm me and then I had a problem with a threat a Wal-Mart attorney made: He said he could and would sue our town for frivolous litigation in order to break our will using Wal-Marts money. I said to Wal-Mart: I may be the only citizen who can make this case but you need to let your lawyers know: The only people who will be paying for what is frivolous litigation is Wal-Mart as obviously your lawyers REFUSE TO CONSIDER ACTUAL REALITY that a citizen can and will mount a successful federal case against as I HAVE AN AIRTIGHT ARGUMENT. I then gave them my airtight argument. Neptune Beach was founded in a tax revolt and we happen to be a military town and I know where our debt rests, why Sam Walton said a PAC was bad for everyone and that Wal-Mart has allowed branches of the communist party to operate in its Chinese stores. CHINA is the reason the sitting Officers were so hot to invade Iraq as China is consuming so much oil. These lawyers were never challenged before or town attorneys are doing terrible jobs as ours is incompetent. Wal-Mart announced it was leaving but did not say why. Thus: I do have the correct PAC case as Citizens United is now the 5th same exact PAC case only this time it got past the Justices as: David Suter retired. He was the Justice who caught this every time and stopped it. Or so we allege.

318.

In case it is still lost on you: An actual shadow government arose after the assassination of Lincoln. Although Thomas Jefferson influences everything we are and do lawyers deny him as do others; the unjust run every which way from him while they erect meaningless monuments to him, turning romantic liberal love brotherly love - into hero worship. This shadow government, created by licensed lawyers and the unethical, is why America is actually dumbing itself down as both Jefferson and Thurgood noted this injury that is realized as a physical incapacitation. In the 70s Roger Sperry confirmed the differences in male/female brains thus our left/right thinking. Or so we allege.

319.

The shadow government that turned criminal came to a head with BVG and Obama as Cheney and Rumsfeld worked for Nixon and then Ford when the vote was lame ducked with term limits thus the ruling class power was cemented permanently or so they wrongly believe: The ABA has its headquarters in Chicago. As does ACORN who Obama once worked for and trust me, from little phony baloney spoiled brat acorns mighty oaks do not grow. Plant fake acorns? You get a denial of liberty. Im one of the constitution oaks as I am liberty and I plant liberty wherever I go; witnesses will attest to the truth of it as I was asked to hang a symbolic representation in the Cathedral in Albany and so I hung: A Pennsylvania Dutch hex sign covered in acorns and oak leaves that I hand drew. Exactly like no person but Jefferson understood constitutional authority nobody understood my symbolic representation so I had to reason it. The truth was lost on them in translation but it went up exactly like the Declaration was posted. Do you know why Jefferson said theres a gate between church and state? Because: There are no walls, no hierarchies. The lines of demarcation you are drawing and living out exist in your heads but are not the actual reality of the universe or US law as The Founders wrote it. I proved GATE not WALL as without any fanfare the Catholic Church hung up my sign instructing you to go to the Constitution thus The Creator. Its our nature not to be institutionalized so I drew oaks leaves and acorns seeds - on paper when

paper is made from trees. I said, Its a building, people you might want to look for your proof of God or your proof of life elsewhere like out the window. Or: inside your own self. Do you know how many lines of demarcation I was crossing in the Catholic Church? Thats a test exactly like a legal test as those lines are not reality in the Catholic Church either but I may be the only one to know the actual lawful, theological reasoning. The US shares something similar as YOU fill in the blank as youre supposed to declare it and then fight for it, that truth, your own self. Or so we allege.

320. Faux mighty oaks: Obama denies he ever worked for ACORN. He did. ACORN? DC has a vested interest and right where ACORN is concerned and New Orleans is a city I was once a resident of; there are reasons it disturbs me that New Orleans was their headquarters based on everything I know about New Orleans, poverty and prejudice; again I am an expert where money laundering is concerned thus I could account for all of this:

What if Barack Obamas most important radical connection has been hiding in plain sight all along? Obama has had an intimate and long-term association with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (Acorn), the largest radical group in America. If I told you Obama had close ties with MoveOn.org or Code Pink, youd know what I was talking about. Acorn is at least as radical as these better-known groups, arguably more so. Yet because Acorn works locally, in carefully selected urban areas, its national profile is lower. Acorn likes it that way. And so, Id wager, does Barack Obama. This is a story weve largely missed. While Obamas Acorn connection has not gone entirely unreported, its depth, extent, and significance have been poorly understood. Typically, media background pieces note that, on behalf of Acorn, Obama and a team of Chicago attorneys won a 1995 suit forcing the state of Illinois to implement the federal motor-voter bill. In fact, Obamas Acorn connection is far more extensive. In the few stories where Obamas role as an Acorn leadership trainer is noted, or his seats on the boards of foundations that may have supported Acorn are discussed, there is little follow-up. Even these more extensive reports miss many aspects of Obamas ties to Acorn.

An Anti-Capitalism Agenda

To understand the nature and extent of Acorns radicalism, an excellent place to begin is Sol Sterns 2003 City Journal article, ACORNs Nutty Regime for Cities. (For a shorter but helpful piece, try Steven Malangas Acorn Squash.)

Sol Stern explains that Acorn is the key modern successor of the radical 1960s New Left, with a 1960s-bred agenda of anti-capitalism to match. Acorn, says Stern, grew out of one of the New Lefts silliest and most destructive groups, the National Welfare Rights Organization. In the 1960s, NWRO launched a campaign of sit-ins and disruptions at welfare offices. The goal was to remove eligibility restrictions, and thus effectively flood welfare rolls with so many clients that the system would burst. The theory, explains Stern, was that an impossibly overburdened welfare system would force a radical reconstruction of Americas unjust capitalist economy. Instead of a socialist utopia, however, we got the culture of dependency and family breakdown that ate away at Americas inner cities until welfare reform began to turn the tide.

While Acorn holds to NWROs radical economic framework and its confrontational 1960s-style tactics, the targets and strategy have changed. Acorn prefers to fly under the national radar, organizing locally in liberal urban areas where, Stern observes, local legislators and reporters are often slow to grasp how radical Acorns positions really are. Acorns new goals are municipal living wage laws targeting big-box stores like Wal-Mart, rolling back welfare reform, and regulating banks efforts styled as combating predatory lending. Unfortunately, instead of helping workers, Acorns living-wage campaigns drive businesses out of the very neighborhoods where jobs are needed most. Acorns opposition to welfare reform only threatens to worsen the selfreinforcing cycle of urban poverty and family breakdown. Perhaps most mischievously, says Stern, Acorn uses banking regulations to pressure financial institutions into massive donations that it uses to finance supposedly non-partisan voter turn-out drives. This is authoritarian rule. Its Nazism not socialism; its Marxism not socialism.

According to Stern, Acorns radical agenda sometimes shifts toward undisguised authoritarian socialism. Fully aware of its living-wage campaigns tendency to drive businesses out of cities, Acorn hopes to force companies that want to move to obtain exit visas. How much longer before Acorn calls for exit visas for wealthy or middle-

class individuals before they can leave a city? asks Stern, adding, This is the road to serfdom indeed. Stanley Kurtz, National Review.

ACORN IN RETREAT By Matthew Vadum on 8.26.09 @ 6:08AM

While ACORN retreats across the nation, an upcoming voter registration fraud trial may reveal embarrassing information that hinders the ability of the embattled radical activist group to function.

The testimony will come as soon as next month from former ACORN Las Vegas field director Christopher Edwards. Charged with election fraud by Nevada's Democratic attorney general, he cut a deal last week with prosecutors and has pleaded guilty to two counts of conspiracy to commit the crime of compensation for registration of voters.

ACORN allegedly enforced voter registration quotas with its employees and offered bonuses for extra registrations. Nevada law forbids the use of such incentives on the theory it encourages canvassers to file fraudulent registrations.

As part of the plea deal, Edwards, whom state investigators consider to be the mastermind of the incentive program, has agreed to testify against former regional director, Amy Busefink, and against ACORN, which is a co-defendant. The Las Vegas Sun reported that Edwards acknowledged he conspired with Busefink and ACORN to create the "Blackjack" incentive program that gave canvassers an extra $5 for submitting 21 or more registration cards each day. The daily quota was allegedly 20 forms.

If ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) happens to be convicted, it could have its status as a nonprofit corporation revoked in Nevada, which could make it very difficult for the ACORN network to operate in that key battleground state.

Such a conviction would send shock waves through leftist organizing circles across the nation and might embolden more prosecutors to take on ACORN. Until it was charged by Nevada this year, ACORN had boasted about its ability to duck prosecution for election fraud. Yes as Congress funds this criminal activity and didnt Harry Reid say light skinned black is what they were needing to place on the ballot? Choose him and then fund ACORN so hes elected. The class refuses to pay for its own death for no reason or cause; we refuse to fund the injury and harm.

Amy Schur, a senior ACORN official who has been in charge of the group's national campaigns, is likely to testify in the Nevada case, said Karen Inman of St. Paul, Minnesota, a former member of ACORN's national board.

Schur's testimony might be devastating to ACORN because it could publicly air many of the group's skeletons, suggested Inman, a lawyer by training.

That's because Schur has intimate knowledge of how ACORN operates and was one member of a group within ACORN including then-chief organizer and founder Wade Rathke that covered up a nearly $1 million embezzlement by Rathke's brother, Inman said. Wade Rathke was fired by the board last summer and ordered to sever all ties with ACORN. He has failed to do so. He is still, for example, chief organizer of SEIU Local 100 in New Orleans, an ACORN affiliate he founded.

Inman herself was ousted from the national board by management last fall after she asked too many questions about the embezzlement. Now she's one of the leaders of the "ACORN 8," a group of former ACORN members trying to reform ACORN.

Liz Wolf of Citizens Consulting Inc. (CCI), the shadowy financial nerve center of the ACORN network, has been negotiating with tax collectors on behalf of ACORN to have interest on its tax debts waived and to have some of the debts partially forgiven, Inman said. An American never negotiates their safety and that is what this negotiation constitutes.

CCI alone owes at least $400,000 in back taxes to the IRS, various states, and the District of Columbia. Collectively, the many affiliates within the ACORN network owe millions of dollars to tax authorities.

Experts say the taxes owed are probably employment taxes, the same taxes used to support the Big Government programs that ACORN is so enamored of. Always resourceful, ACORN is using its massive tax liabilities to cry poor and beg funders for more money.

According to Inman, so far this year ACORN has closed many of its offices nationwide. Offices in Ohio (Dayton and Columbus), Michigan (Grand Rapids), and Texas have closed their doors. The offices in Oakland, California, and in her hometown of St. Paul are barely operating, she said.

"This is the first time in Minnesota that the office has gone dormant after an election," she said.

ACORN is moving much of its operations out of its traditional headquarters in New Orleans to New York so executive director Steve Kest and chief organizer Bertha Lewis can exercise tighter control over the whole network, Inman explained.

Former ACORN employees are facing trial on election fraud charges in Pittsburgh, but those charges appear to be on hold now that the ACLU is challenging the constitutionality of Pennsylvania's voter registration law. ACORN remains under investigation by the local Democratic prosecutor in Cleveland, Ohio, after a grand jury indicted a local man for voting illegally after being registered multiple times by ACORN. The Louisiana attorney general's office is also investigating ACORN.

The Edwards plea bargain came the same week that CCI, the financial heart of the ACORN network, was accused of filing false lobbying disclosure reports with Congress. That revelation is important because, as former D.C. ACORN housing committee member Charles Turner said earlier this year, CCI "is where the shell game begins."

"ACORN has over 200 different entities that the money gets moved around to - for this purpose to that purpose, this organization to that organization," said Turner. "We believe the way the money has been moved around, they've been laundering money."

Former ACORN officials say these activities are controlled by the mysterious CCI, which is located in ACORN's headquarters in New Orleans. CCI handles the financial affairs of hundreds of affiliates within the ACORN network. ACORN member dues, government money, and foundation grants, are all sucked into the CCI vortex often never to be seen again.

Earlier this month, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-California), ranking member on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, sent an information request to the IRS about CCI, which he noted "simultaneously managed the accounts of political and private donor-funded organizations."

In the letter, Issa asked if "CCI's co-management of various tax-exempt and non-exempt affiliate accounts, many of which receive federal funds and some of which are 527s, violate[d]" the Internal Revenue Code. His follow-up question was, "If so, has the IRS taken steps to prevent CCI's co-management of affiliate accounts that are legally required to be separate and segregated?"

Issa's committee investigators released a report last month stating that ACORN "is a shell game played in 120 cities, 43 states and the District of Columbia through a complex structure designed to conceal illegal activities, to use taxpayer and tax-exempt dollars for partisan political purposes, and to distract investigators."

The report examines the ACORN network's abusive interlocking directorates, and claims that the group deliberately organized itself to escape legal and public scrutiny. "ACORN hides behind a paper wall of nonprofit corporate protections to conceal a criminal conspiracy on the part of its directors, to launder federal money in order to pursue a partisan political agenda and to manipulate the American electorate."

Although the actions and possible outcomes explored in this article aren't likely to end up killing ACORN outright, it's clear that the group has already used up more than a few of its nine lives. -end

321. I own a legal argument for the voters of DC as currently their vote holds no weight or has no weight when voting in Presidential elections and that is because of the vote DC casts in Congress in open and direct violation of the law. DC began taking this vote on behalf of the Trust with the Organic Act; see my motion. This vote then negates the vote of everyone in DC and it negated the vote of FL and my vote alone. People born in DC? They happen to possess the most absolute and purest form the vote takes. They do not know that their vote can take this form and does as that congressional vote is so deceiving. DC is the cause of the first cause??? I also own legal arguments for several other people and/or groups. I keep receiving or acquiring or coming to own more arguments as everyone has a problem that they need solved and they do not go to Obama or anybody in his employ but to me, other members of counsel and the exactly named class. MA now says we could cure illiteracy by 100% if we dump liberty on their children. I also have arguments for every Native American tribe most notably the Sioux as arguing Federal Bureau Lands out of existence via default and then forward into existence allows me to address the Ft. Laramie Treaty as the Sioux won but they won money which they have refused to accept. How convenient is this argument? Very convenient:

322. Currently those in Congress are arguing over Federal Bureau Lands and taxation as the Western states have more land held in trust than the Eastern states and people do not understand that as Western states cannot then use that land they are not benefitting - nor receiving just compensation as taxes have never been apportioned correctly. Reps and citizens in states that have little or no land held by the Bureau do not understand this issue exactly as most Americans do not as they never learned. You cannot attack an issue

such as this unless you place everything on the table as arguing forward you then have the debate you never had and so you create a reconstituted America whereby the voters will be informed when they cast a vote in 2012. Its not about securing any one ruling, getting any outside award or convincing voters to vote any one way. Its about: voters, upon being informed and so reasoning their own position in space, casting a conscientious vote. Its about Americans taking control of their own lives rather than trying to control others, passively succumbing to victimization or never participating at all. Its about faulting yourself instead of blaming others or blaming nebulous entities such as they the US government. Ive argued it all out of existence legally; does that mean you throw the baby out with the bath water? Of course not and youll want to keep what does work or what can be fine tuned. Or so we allege.

323.

If we prove anything it is: Nobody but nobody had to go to DC and wait upon the Legislature to act to strike down the 13th, 14th, 16th or 17th amendments or Federal Code. I was able to work with whatever I was given, stuck with or shackled to; the members of the class were able to deal with things as they are not as we personally wanted them to be as we are realists. What can 200 years of lawyers, lobbyists, criminals, foreigners or fakers do to us if we do not participate or if we act in our own defense? Nothing. This is America; you outsmart your enemies. Outsmart yourself first: Learn what you never learned. Then return fire as you too can declare yourself; Congress has you in a bind? Declare yourself. Forge your own manumission papers: Petition SCOTUS.

324.

Now, after almost four years of wrangling with these clerks to ensure I had every piece of the puzzle that is the injury itself Danny Bickle and William Suter are still up to it as other lawyers have complained that documents are missing, not filed or that the docket is tampered with false entries are on it or in one case the entry disappeared altogether. I have zero evidence that

any Justice ever saw my documents, they could not have seen test of Marbury in any summary, the nature of the injury makes it possible that they might have read the petition but not have known what they were reading although we doubt this happened again as we have no evidence at all and the entries in my case are so outrageous that nobody believes a Justice wrote them and the clerks pushed a case through that would effectively pit the Justices against The People. Danny Bickle told Orly Taitz that he hid or destroyed her documents when she filed a case against Obama because it is political on his part. I confronted the clerks and this, that Bickle said HIS motive is political, has never been denied. POLITICS WAS HIS NAMED REASON. John Marshall said its all political and it is so what could Bickle mean?

325. I believe Danny Bickle, as a citizen reported this act to me and gave me his name where before I did not know it, meant: OFFICE POLITICS.

326.

I went all over the US testing lawyers; every lawyer save one was not willing to stand on his own two feet; nobody but nobody who is a lawyer was willing to tell the truth. They not only denied they are Officers and blamed SCOTUS but as they knew they were lying and manipulating The People they then refused to appear out of fear; some were afraid of the unknown while others were afraid of the consequences of guilt as they did what they did with criminal intent. My own experience of life in the family courts in three states? Lawyers including the judge have a silent agreement; they will never cite each others names exactly and never call each other on their actions. Like bad doctors protect other bad doctors? This happened to me with lawyers. In family court lawyers mostly men set out to violate Article 4 Section 4 by arranging outside agreements with opposing counsel to sell women and children thus EVERY lawyer gets paid. Sometimes the judge knows and sometimes the judge does not know; if the judge does not know? Then what they do not know is they, the judge, are the victim of crazy making. If you

look the pattern is incapacitate a woman and somebody is killed; now its changed to incapacitate a judge and somebody gets killed. Or so we allege.

327.

The piece of the puzzle lost on me: LAWYERS AND OTHER OFFICERS NOW SUFFER FROM BATTERED WOMANS SYNDROME. The gang mentality I and the class kept banging into is actual battered womens syndrome as defined by the experts. I had to discern that what we are encountering nationally we are encountering locally, not as individuals but as a profession. It is endemic to the legal profession itself today. Or so we allege.

328. I knew to hold Obama via the world court in DC thus the US retains jurisdiction as unlike Obama I told the court that although I had no choice but to charge the clerks and voters with guilt there are fine differences in this word such as the violation of a private right versus a public right so that I needed them to receive it but not file it as: I dont run around charging people w/o evidence rising to proof. Plus: This is civil court. I wrote to the clerks in SCOTUS, specifically Clayton Higgins, and told him that he would read words like GUILTY but that I knew the difference between historical fact and legal fact and that I knew what he and I experienced such as I knew what I said when I conferred constitutional authority upon him and he acted. Knowing there are two world courts and that I would argue a charge of high treason war crimes at the Hague in Geneva as it falls under admiralty law, I told the DC world court that I was going back to DC to finish the job now that Obama had directly threatened me and civilly convicted the Justices. If you believe Obama is legal? US case law is I can sue him for directly injuring me alone. Unfortunately for Obama VICTIM is a legal designation for me and the exactly named class not a state of being like it is for he and his cronies. Or so we allege.

329.

I, Susan, am the last American standing or the first actual American to rise any way you count BVG. Antonin Scalia said in BVG first you reason the law then you count the votes. Correct, so WHY wasnt the law reasoned first in our case? LAWYERS do not want to stand down; LAWYERS have delusions of grandeur as they truly believe only they are citizens. Lawyers are so mentally ill at this point the entire graduating class of Harvard is afraid to sue Harvard itself together or alone. Recently Harvard, after I mailed a copy of our suit to them, threatened me with this: 5 Justices graduated from Harvard so they will rule for us. I said, Great! Justices do not rule they opine and we have 5 experts on Harvard who will laugh every time you try to claim that youre different and so youre a special exception as youre Harvard. Theyll know you are lying as they went there and thats not the truth. As actual experts where Harvard is concerned they own the knowledge. I told Harvard to think of black or profit and red or debt and that they are a red tide stinky and bacteria laden - while I am the actual crimson tide: blood red as Im alive as my system is currency not money. The voters and federal judges who are voters more so than lawyers might be interested as I tell a legal joke thats genuine:

330. Upon entering the federal courts I discovered that Americans are not afraid of liability lawsuits but of God! They equate judgment to God and so as they avoid judgment at all costs then they deny God or react if you use that word. Atheists said theres no such thing as God but then that God was inside a person. Wait: does God exist or not? Youre your own boss? Is this semantics or anti-Semitism? The word God is merely a contraction of the words the good or good alone. If youre afraid of God? Maybe you have a reason to be afraid like youre a crook who acted to steal fire from the gods but failed as I stole it first as I know that its The People you fleece:

331.

By returning with 08-6622 I parked The People with the Military or against the sitting Officers so once default is? Every Officer falls down to the local

level as DC CITY IS THEN A FOREIGN NATION OF AND TO ITSELF AND THEY ARE ALLEGIANT TO OBAMA AND KENYA, GREAT BRITAIN, INDONESIA, SOVIETS, COMMUNISTS AND ATHEISTS BUT NOT THE PEOPLE, NOT THE ORIGINAL GOVERNING DOCUMENTS. 07-9804 parks the military and is a waiver of the 1871 version; it fell and 08-6622 is actual legal default so they defaulted on the originals. At that point they are a foreign nation exactly like the Vatican City as Congress prints its own money, it is not found anywhere in US law or history as it exists now and that money? There is not enough energy to support it as Congress prints it at its whim and will (The Vatican prints money as Congress does; does it coin currency? That remains to be seen; its why the Vatican banking scandal in the early 80s is yet a sore spot, as its a form of slavery or human bondage; its money laundering). 086622 then preserved the seats of two ethical clerks as seats of original jurisdiction. So then, having the last answer I needed, I phoned Bickle to leave him a message and received one of the great shocks of my life: Bickle answered the phone. I know what I told Bickle; part of it is I believe when you said politics to Taitz and I know you did this that you meant office politics. I believe a power struggle has been going on that is about control not authority and what Donofrio did is wrong. I also believe you do not know something vital and that the contents of the emergency application I sent to you that you hid within the court are symbolic; while a lawyer might absolute it to death another reader, a voter who is not a lawyer wouldnt. Its a fact: you harmed another clerk when you hid that application; you harmed my two children and me. Now you are harming 300 million Americans by not filing a good application 6 times over as you and I both know it will go directly to a Justice named Roberts and then he will know what you have been doing. Danny Bickle did not object. When he did not object I said, That happened. I know the difference between historical fact and legal fact. Did you do it? is a different question than are you guilty and even then, is it a personal wrong or a crime? Is it a sin? Is it treason? I know historical fact, it happened, is not the same thing as actually being guilty of a crime. Are you the stay clerk who allowed BVG entry? Bickle said, No. Thats fundamental; he confessed he did it; he also confessed it is office politics as in its SCOTUS and lawyer;

but if it is then WHO is it? Suter and Obama, thats who as they are all lawyers and Suter and Obama were there when BVG was heard. The difference is: Suter works as an officer of the Judiciary so he is not denying as a licensed lawyer he is an officer while Obama is denying this and is denying just about every other fact and law of his actual life and actual person. Or so we allege.

332. When I subjected a clerk to a direct line of questioning? He told me the truth albeit ugly. When I subjected Bob Bauer and Obama to a direct line of questioning? I was lied to and threatened. The very first clerk I spoke to told me the truth. It always begins and ends at William Suter in the Office of Clerks but only I have argued the distinction between stay clerk and chief clerk as the Stay Clerk handles actual emergencies thus a lawyer should not have gone to Suter to complain about Bickle as that constitutes a grudge match but they did that regardless setting off a different dynamic so it became about power and control abusive not authority; in one case I was told the truth and threatened and in the other case I was lied to and threatened. In the end the clerks ended up filing me as FILING thus ADJUDICATION occur simultaneously in this unique case.

333. The truth works like an anti-biotic; you begin to develop immunity as soon as you stop lying to yourself and each other. Fear? Its a lie you tell yourself! Forms of fear such as self-doubt are going off inside the clerks office but the actual reasoning might surprise you as all forms of fear ARE a form of violence and so every injury is emotional first and then it turns physical and lastly sexual. But first a criminal must gain custody of you and for that? You volunteer if you are over 18 but what if you werent at the time of injury? Or what if: YOU NEVER HAD A CONTRACT WITH US TO BEGIN WITH, UNTIL I APPEARED?

334.

Aaron Burr was heard before SCOTUS and there is at least one federal question present so I can charge the Officers civilly and I did in 2007, before the first primary and before Harry Reid confessed to stacking thus manipulating or controlling the ballot. Reid said that we would accept a light skinned black man who did not speak with an accent thats control or manipulation; its deliberation. The class NEVER held this belief those are appearances only. Substance: you bring the charge civilly via a proceeding heard in SCOTUS as US law names it. Its not a civil conviction. Barack Obama has substance too as he knew as absolute fact most Americans would be watching the State of the Union Address and he also knew Roberts would be there as it is the current Chief Justices habit or tradition as its not mandatory and that is another fact that I find very interesting as once Americans began asking questions the fact that the Justices volunteered to be present came up, as if Obama was not acting with deliberation or as if the Justices are his willing victims and are wrong. The majority of Americans truly believed the Justices were ordered to be present and had no liberty. A just man wouldnt act this way but a criminal and/or a foreigner who isnt a genius and who cant reason law or think in theoretical terms would. Or so we allege.

335.

Susan Herbert, class member Al Franken and John Ratzinger, the current Pope of the Roman Catholic Church are the absolute proof: Al Franken, in a speech he gave this past summer or perhaps fall, which was televised came to a point whereby he said Citizens United and Election 08 effectively pitting The People against the Judiciary, especially the Chief. It was obvious to me that he wrote his own speech. As he using words to assault The People? Al Franken was giving this speech as if it were a formality, as if he was asked to do it and agreed, so now he was reading the formal or proper speech in written speech form he was asked to give. Then Franken began to lie, pitting The People against the Justices then naming all of these supposedly good things since election 08 when he suddenly stopped midsentence. He looked up and then said, not exactly worded, The truth is

it is not any of those things. The truth is its us; it is up to us he then said a few more words about this talking directly to the audience before he finished giving the formal speech he prepared. Al Franken wrote those lies on a piece of paper his own self; he began to say them but when he heard himself saying those words out loud he stopped and told the truth instead: Its not any of those things; its us. You know when you are or arent lying; you might need to hear yourself say it out loud to then know exactly how false it is as you then feel the emotional truth of it and you then have the life experience of going here you now own the knowledge - but will you continue to lie or will you correct yourself and tell the truth? If Al Franken can and did exert self-control then Barack Obama could have done the same and I do not believe that Obama did not see an advance copy of this speech as reports are Obama is anxious to see the speeches written for him and Obama is eerily machine like and overly studied when he speaks. A teleprompter would not account for the severity of this machine-like quality Ive noticed as lots of people use teleprompters. John Ratzinger is an expert linguist. I am told he speaks at least 5 languages fluently. Before acting as Pope his job was to expertly translate church doctrine and other intellectual property of the church into other languages making certain NOTHING is lost in translation. It is considered to be one of the most difficult jobs to do as with language a tiny mistake like a misspelling or a mispronounced word can then change the entire meaning of a sentence or even an entire document. For instance the book Madame Bovary has never been translated in such a way that it retains the QUALITIES of the original work. Its not a masterpiece and not even art in other languages. I am telling this court: to even translate a pop song from one language to another is tricky as even rhyme scheme must be accounted for; very few people can do what Ratzinger can. Ratzinger gave a speech in which he offended Muslims. It angered so many people the Vatican apologized or did they? John Ratzinger knew as absolute fact what he was reading as he read it. He in no way, shape, manner or form meant or intended to say anything else. He knew and he said it. The Vatican issued a statement to the press, stopping short of apologizing. John Ratzinger exactly said that some teachings of the prophet Mohammed are

evil and inhuman. He was quoting a Byzantine Emperor. In a statement Ratzinger said he was sorry for the reaction some people had to his remarks as in he was sorry that people took these remarks upon themselves as if they were true about their own persons. He did not apologize for what he said as he meant and intended to say this: The emperor comes to speak about the issue of jihad, holy war, the pope said. He said, I quote, Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached. I, Susan, can reason and argue US law on the spot, without any notes and without any preparation. I can also argue science and theology cold. When I read something I have never laid eyes on before I know if the words are the truth or if they are a lie; I know what I am reading in the moment without any advance notice. Barack Obama meant and intended to say what he said when he gave the State of the Union Address in January of 2010. Barack Obama is knowing, willful and deliberate. Or so we allege.

336.

You know how a jury can visit a crime scene? Well, I made the mountain come to Mohammed as you heard Obama argue HIS case. The crime scene came to the jury, the planet, as the SOTUA is broadcast worldwide. Is anything about Obama the truth? Is the body dead? There is a line of demarcation that you cross in the US and once you go there you are an institution; while your heart may beat your spirit is dead and maybe it was never alive. Americans are now being subjected to one of the most painful deaths there is: Human starvation. To deny The People liberty is to deny them food; you are engaging them in what is a war of attrition as no man can live on sheer will alone. You mean and intend to break their spirit when the Founders deliberately gave the founding documents a sense of spirituality. No spirit? No hope; a person who has their spirit broken loses all hope. To die is not to experience death as I stated above; Obama? To experience Obama is to experience death as BVG was to die for. Or so we allege.

337. To rationalize and justify violating the law and the spirit of the law for Obama and McCain who do not qualify under US law and case law you must tell yourself that not one single woman is able or capable and that not one ethical man is left and that if one exists he too must be wholly unable and incapable. Foreignization of the Executive is a knowing, willing and deliberate hate crime against women as it is meant to incapacitate them in such a way you then can and may slaughter them but as you have permission then you will never be judged as a murderer. It is meant to prevent women from ever securing their rights, or, its meant to be permanent. It is the realization of self-hatred. If you hate women then you hate your mother and so you hate your own self. You hate America. Or so we allege.

338.

Another expert, Susan Clemons, would say it to you this way as her area of expertise is belief systems and language: There are various belief systems perspectives - and most people cobble together absolutes from each one to form a whole. In life most people desperately cling to these absolutes as they are afraid if they give up one absolute belief or amend it then their entire belief system falls apart which is not the truth. People who cling to absolutes like this thus denying reality are usually the personality type that is ego based and so their very reasoning that then caused them to have these absolute beliefs that they will not let go of is irrational. Another way this is realized is through the injury; if you are injured by prejudice you might adopt unreasonable absolutes. If a person is unreasonable then you CANT argue with him or her but you CAN argue the point of law. If the person who is the judge is the frivolous thing then he or she has to go as you only control yourself and you cant force anybody to the Constitution not even a judge. The gang mentality produced by this fear regarding your belief system being questioned as it seems as if there is safety in numbers when there isnt was shattered by the living people who are willing. When they have a concrete example of someone telling the truth fearlessly then they begin to act

without fear. We never have to believe the same exact things but we do have to share that common ethic, the original founding documents. Or so we allege.

339.

A court heard Rodney Class but cancelled the meeting when Eric Holder failed to appear thus Class one via default as did I. Class did not know I made the case or that SCOTUS has no office of judgment so you would have to go back to DC via the circuit court or world court. Rodney Class would only end up returning here. A judge might not have known this plus: If Eric Holder tells you in no uncertain terms that he is not willing to reason as his failure to appear, that action, is the proof? ERIC HOLDER THEN IS IMPOSSIBLE. You cant make Holder reason and the one thing the Attorney General needs to do is reason. Its the same for Obama; if these men have a personality type thats mentally ill its a disorder - and they are irrational thus not capable of reason we cant be made to deal with them its impossible - thus they never need to appear. Clemons will tell you: they are not willing to examine their personal beliefs that caused them to act as they did thus they are not willing to face and so own the actual weight of the guilt of their actions. These men? They will only make an appearance if its jail, insanity or death first and they said they will kill you inside military run camps before you kill them with the truth. They say this because: They actually believe we NEED them to appear as you could issue a million warrants and they can ignore them all. The constitutional provision for a war of attrition is failure to act is foreign; its automatically a loss as failing to act is not a choice you may consider. I never met Class in person but obviously we share an ethic and as law is reciprocal then Ill take my volunteers whenever they appear: Class is now constitutionally set under o.j. as he acted and he entered after I did so he enters upon me. Obama loves the Whitehouse so much? He can keep it and everything in it; he can sit in the Oval Office at the desk while we The People appear. WE NEVER ASKED TO BE AWARDED THINGS ESPECIALLY THOSE THINGS. WE DO NOT SEEK A REWARD. Or so we allege.

340.

My experience of life has been a law license was first in Clayton Higgins way; once he was harmed by another clerk? It was as if that law license finally fell away. People with titles and licenses od not own the knowledge of victimization until they are injured directly. You know the saying fail to plan thus plan to fail? No, no, no as youre American so its vote to plan thus plan to vote so failsafe is built inside of your vote wielded as an Executive Order exactly like Blackwell (or Blackstone) is inside or intrinsic to Marbury. Or so we allege.

341.

An ethical lawyer told me he prefers Blackwells form. When he adjudicated the case he said that he himself prefers that form so he uses it as one of the points of law we discussed is judging the proof of life cases based upon appearance of the dead paper alone. So then: I need to make the DC circuit aware of this as I do not know if he meant style or form as in quoting Blackwells as if we have been using some type of form like a guide to then fashion complaints we have been using what is British. I adhered to the SCOTUS rules, the strictest standard. If I had to do something like shrink my type of enlarge my margins? I told Higgins I had done it. I told him I am not that kind of cheap person who believes Im sneaking something past you. I told him I knew about a famous lawyer who had his brief thrown at him in open court as he was told to comply with the rules as to type and margins and when he pulled a stunt the judge hurled his brief at him. I would have done the same in his case. If you as a judge or lawyer or voter ever believe I am taking a shortcut or pulling one of these stunts I am not. If I do something theres actual reasoning; I am not challenging you or testing you to see what I can or cannot get away with in your courtroom. You need to know: Online I have found lawyers putting out advice as to what you can and cant do before an exact judge. They tell you what individual judges prefer and claim, If you do these things this judge will favor you. That can be a lethal manipulation if you are not aware of it; if people begin catering to personal likes then you are being incapacitated and you might never know it. Or so we allege.

342. Where once I was a lone fisher of men now I am not; now those very men I caught and released fish for themselves as while Harvard the Corporation and its private endowment planned to steal the vote I planned to cast one that ultimately captured the Earth and everything on it as Obama is my proof: Harvard Law thinks too small to be American in nature. I would suggest actual reality is it isnt American as it was founded in 1636 by the European, it admits legacies and so has a sense of entitlement and it attempts to keep secrets from us but fails as a professor who was there reported to me that he attended a political rally at Harvard before Clinton was elected that instructed people to elect a personality type across party lines as then HARVARD or Europe and socialists its the same thing in different forms - would control that person or that: lawyer. This professor said he was disturbed that they named BILL CLINTON and that later Clinton was elected and now you had Obama as the election then had to be rigged as it cant be just as: NOBODY HAS DISPUTED THAT BILL CLINTON IS A TRAINWRECK OR OBAMAS FATHER IS KENYAN NOT AMERICAN.

343. If you look not only cant Obama write but his facts are like Clintons; they do have the same deluded or inserted sense of self and they are both liars. They are power hungry egomaniacs who came from abusive, alcoholic and fatherless households. Instead of aspiring towards life they aspired towards death, insisting that the paper or lack thereof proves them when all it proves is the lie they are telling. Everything is symbolic for something else and youll realize you are looking at patterns that repeat themselves; the confusion you experience thus the fear, shame, anger and guilt you feel? Its uniquely American!

Subject: What are you looking at, Thomas Jefferson or a tomato?

Now that you've checked the books against the accounts? Which version of US history do you believe? Which form is true?

I propose: As he believes he can act in secret BARACK OBAMA would be an LLC not an Executive. It's foreign and it's an invasion only it came in on little cat feet: your own vote. No joke: Toxoplasmosis is a parasite that humans contract via handling cat feces as cat's ingest the parasite; there seems to be a casual link between toxoplasmosis and SCHIZOPHRENIA. Toxoplasmosis can settle in your brain and it might lie dormant but the parasite never goes away so it seems as if ownership of cats can trigger cases of genetically predisposed schizophrenia as the parasite becomes active or as you newly contract it.

I'd accept his plea of toxoplasmosis due to the knee deep poop he's obviously wading in but I can't blame it on the cat as Obama owns a dog.

Your clue is: A machine can't tell you a joke spontaneously while Obama can't pick a nuclear war and resolve it spontaneouslyedited

All I did is weigh the universe and then discern the standard unit of time as mass or as energy having volume or capacity as my timing is perfect. Removing me from the court record is an old favorite but can you remove me from The People? Foolish people have foolish ideas which they then act upon making them fools. Every "scientist" - anybody who maintains anything even websites - and so every professional tax collector failed to account for this difference but Newton was looking in the correct direction: The bible. He was working the numbers but he did not publicize this. The Book of Numbers itself reveals a cool mathematical fact: a tune. It's literal as numbers denote spatial relationships and their tone is a universal constant. The Book of Numbers? The symbolism is the truth!

I know which shape time is, the math behind it, the truth of the nuclear lie as man is not actually splitting the atom anymore than he is actually smashing particles and I possess the detailed plans as I resolved Uniformity so then the advantage is mine as I did not write these plans down upon paper in any form you will comprehend; I'm like an

Einstein without a Max Planck to recognize me and then begin deciphering me as there's something to this past what meets the ear and eye, lol. You CAN but WILL you? You never needed to figure out what time is or looks like; that is an interest of mine and it is my nature...nobody paid me to break out of time. Then again nobody paid me to act in time either. FOR PAY is the thing as that's the vote. The detailed, written plan known as time? FREE!!! A GIFT: YOU ALREADY HAVE IT IN ANOTHER FORM: US LAW AS ORIGINALLY WRITTEN! What conspiracy??? You conspired alone. You: Voted. Unless you voted for yourself? You opened the door and you let me in on bigger cat feet. You exactly? You begged me to come in via an LLC as you could care less who knows your name as long as you can maintain the delusion that you're FOR liberty with the false title you operate under: "Free". What's the name of you, the LLC and then your website? I suggest you change it from FREE to COST as I couldn't do it to you without that invitation from you and this republic is going to cost you.

In Re Susan Herbert? A very deceptive form or a symbol which is why you did not recognize me until it was way too late - a lawyer got here first and adjudicated the case so you were had, weren't you? YOU possess a ruling issued by a guy who met your own qualifications and called you on it so you know! If your action is the result of the best legal advice your tax attorney has? Fire him as obviously his capacity is diminished. The Greek mean is both curved and straight; it has volume or capacity...imagine a compass, a clock, a sundial and the Vitruvian man all piled one on top of the other. Now imagine the sun rising over the Jefferson Memorial; it has a roof so the statue of Jefferson, which is intrinsic, would cast no shadow while the columns supporting the roof would do a circular dance around him but in relationship to him...it'd be constant. Remove the roof; now imagine the sun rising and Jefferson does cast a shadow along with the columns but not at high or actual noon. It's intrinsic and relative. Jefferson is like a rising sun, a compass needle or a clock hand; you stand in his shadow while I do not. Ideally you need to start at Jefferson as the sun rises and then make it to the ends of the universe and back again before the clock strikes twelve noon but you will know actual noon not by a flat clock but by a shadow falling upon a line, a meridian, aka Article III. Ideally?

Ideally I never exited the shadow of my Creator and never mistook Jefferson for a god and that is your mistake in life. You stand in shadows, you cast shadows and you believe in ghosts thus can't see into every nook and cranny like I can. It's core Voter versus presented Officer as for you there's a difference but in actuality there is not as your facade is self-evidently a fabrication meant to deceive me thereby deceiving you and so: God. The very illusion you create is then the cause of your delusional state. You

believe there is a shadow you can hide behind like an LLC, a paid lawyer or a party and then God won't know. You believe you can avoid the consequences forever. I believe it's worth the adrenaline rush and the wisdom that follows suit to act in front of God, upon your own will and liberty and with consent. Advertise; tell the whole planet. Although your Creator is aware you exist and are about to act and although he knows every single atom of your reasoning, give yourself an opportunity and so send advance notice ahead of your crime. Declare yourself; make a statement of your intentions known. Sign it; see if other actors appear and revolve in the limelight with you thus bask in the glow of their very own design. What good is a stage if nobody's willing to stand upon it? Why be a medium if your form is useless in God's exploration of this manifested universe? If the spotlight is on you so there's no place to hide why not produce a masterpiece? Shadows? You haven't read Genesis in a while, have you?

What is the evidence rising to proof that God cites to then convict both Adam and Eve of the crime known as "eating the apple"? THEIR BEHAVIOR AFTER THE FACT OF IT, AFTER THEY KNOW AS THEY BECAME KNOWING WHEN THEY ACTED UPON THE INDEPENDENT THOUGHT. God cites their skewed emotional compasses - the proof is invisible emotions, the various forms fear takes if it's not experienced as animal instinct but instead as human emotions - and God states the now existent pattern of criminal behavior: LYING. These two clowns lied under oath thus perjuring themselves; they voted thus they created the shadows that haunt you but you blame Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and now, Susan Herbert for what is your own folly: you have a very severe case of stage fright.

Place my name in lights next to Adam and Eve; then place it in lights after Jefferson, Madison, Paine, Jackson or even Nixon. I'm perfectly at peace with all of the attention until you place it after your LLC which is your own name. TRIBUTE? Then I'm climbing out of my grave.

If the theory is the God of this universe created man and so we're the masterpiece, what would the masterwork of all of creation then do? Steal? Murder? Tax you to death? Are you a master worker or a master forger? I'm a masterpiece of work known as endeavor. What actual "master" fills out some forms and so steals taxes? Who endeavors to steal taxes? Steal the entire tax base if that's you, the masterpiece, as you have access to it as the DC cops do not stop you and your ideas with bullets. Follow "apple" with an equivalent idea. Park it in plain sight for all to see as we petition and

pray to the court and let the shooting begin. Discover what will be even if you suspect the truth and even if you do have a huge hint: your name, America. It's an ideal outcome:

The legal entity "Harvey Schlesinger" shot me when he read, "Make no mistake as I'm NOT praying to you the man or the judge so I will never write those words down" and the bullet passed through me as it's an illusion. Ideally I did what I'm designed to do, I disappeared and then reappeared within the blink of an eye or I pulsed as I, Susan, can race as fast as a beam of light and win as my heart beats in time with the universe. Your human limitations, RULES, would sink you not me as the idea that your judgment applies never occurred to me - your approval is not an idea in my head - so consequently as I do not confuse you with the Creator (or the President) then I do not spend most of my time thinking up ways to circumvent what are rules and pisspoor, tired ideas that will never 'work'. I recognize the difference between rule and law. If you've got a process? Ordered, enumerated instructions that are bound like a book? If you hand me your operator's manual I will use it to tie knots around you and then run you in circles, as I'm not bound by paper.

In my version of events the clock would strike 12 and you would jump for joy, shouting that I had lost, as I did not defeat my own shadow, a shadow that for better or worse is cast across this nation. Per usual the cool consideration of my dignity would cause me to produce no reaction; to provoke me you would have to make me laugh at myself and it would have to be truthful. When you are finished rejoicing over another persons failure as you want and need them to fail so you deliberately set them up to fail hence the rules as authored by lawyers, I will inform you that in actuality you have lost as I traveled there and back again so quickly you missed it as humans process visual images in a 'funny' manner:

They 'see' the object they are viewing upside down on their retina - it's projected - and then convert it in their brain to right side up so orient it and themselves to it spatially; the perception you then have of actual reality is deceptive as a part of that perception is feeling as in sensation and emotion. At these heights unjust men suffer from vertigo and altitude sickness. In the time it took for you to process the utter disbelief you felt when you saw visual image of me 'flipping' end over end in your mind like two pyramids in the shape of an hourglass? When you saw me dissolve and then reconstitute before your eyes on the spot or cold so it couldn't be a trick? I went there and came back

again, equaling my own shadow and then exceeding it thus eclipsing it. I can never change the fact that this nation tap dances every which way but Jefferson when the pattern is Jefferson and when Jefferson let it loose however I can change your perspective: You will demand the proof of death and I will give it to you.

As proof I will produce a key I could only have if I traveled faster than light, broke the continuum, slammed into my own self and my own death as Jefferson and then entered the fabled 'kingdom of heaven' thus conquering both death and taxes simultaneously as it's like this: JUNK DNA??? Who are these lawyers??? If I give them the line item veto in the form of a SCOTUS born and SCOTUS bound lawsuit - you never leave to go anywhere else to begin with - I expect Bull Run not an LLC. That's why you have original jurisdiction, so you're exactly not limited. Who slams into the truth of America and comes up with the license limited corporation??? Every one of those words is just wrong."

For those besides Jim: The key? It's symbolic. Here's a hint in keeping with the "Thanksgiving myth" for the lawyers like Jim who believe they have sequenced every letter of the law known as DNA, casting aside the 'junk DNA' via ignoring its existence, just like lawyers cast aside whole governing documents; this will eventually enter the record as I'll print it out to preserve my prediction:

DNA sequencing is done with cells that you shed, just like the skin of a snake. Banks of DNA? That's a joke. Do you know how much of the DNA puzzle they are missing? Wampum belts are not valued for the individual beads as Wampum is not money but currency as the belt itself forms a pattern that mimics human DNA sequencing as if you "subtract" your mother from your own pattern then you are left with your father so you can 'see' the two unique pieces of the puzzle you are. Peter Minuet had no idea how much Manhattan would actually cost him or he never would have offered up $26 in beads of all things he had to offer thus leading the Iroquois to sue the state of NY for harboring stolen sacred objects and me noticing the patterns of DNA to be found on the belts as Native religion was outlawed until 1976 so I noticed. There's a photo of them laid out on a table after they won their suit, next to each other. They're NOT money belts! They're valued for their sacred meaning; you need the whole belt to discern the pattern so the value glass beads had was dependent upon the fact they were like 'premade' Wampum belt beads; they held no 'outside' value as an object of your desire. It's not in the work it took to make a single bead but in the knowledge of the pattern, you

had to know the pattern in which to weave the belt. I saw them next to each other and thought, LINES OF DNA SEQUENCING.

It's sacred geometry but this is most like the pattern of a soundwave; it's more like a song - think of the scroll of paper falling out of a heart monitor with the spiked pattern running across it - than a single note or a single shape as it has dimension like rhythm. Native drumming sounds primordial. Think of the absolute ideas you have within the whole: Do I belong to the Confederacy or the Constitution? That sounds bizarre to me. I plot not think like an American; American is Native America as the Confederacy is your 'mother' while the Magna Carta realized as the Mayflower Compact is your 'father'. If it's "American" then it's unique and the Magna Carta isn't plus you wouldn't have two fathers. I was born here, in 1967: I'm a Native: I'm indigenous to Earth. That's universal also; it's the same thing over again from smallest to largest. WHO belongs to anything smaller than the universe? Draw a giant skull and crossbones over the Constitution. What's the unique poison you're tasting? Strict or loose? Native or natural born? Animal or human? Male or female? Hatchling or egg? Officer or voter? Respondent? Money or currency? MELTING POT OR MIXED SALAD? Petitioner or THE CONFUSION ITSELF IS UNIQUELY AMERICAN:

The first time around the British wore bright red uniforms so it was hard for them to be out of your line of sight; today look and listen different but it's still "red": FL also gave birth to the tomato case, as that industry was located here, in which SCOTUS deemed the tomato is a veggie not a fruit but such a tender vegetable that it NEEDED federal protection. No actual tomatoes testified; no violated tomatoes chimed in on one side or the other. There is no tomato genome on the record. Consequently, pro-active bean counters wearing suits in DC who are actual loyalists hand your child a package of ketchup and claim they have met the federal guidelines for nutrition.

Did you realize they switched out the fruit known as liberty for a tomato? If you know it's a tomato lob it back over the bar in any form, melting pot aka soup or mixed salad aka slices. Who cares as long as you throw it in the direction of Congress?

I extracted the truth and then concentrated it: I placed a strand of red hair under the tape on my SCOTUS envelope. More than once. Process me, check me, sequence me, catch and release me - whatever - as we both know the absolute words are a red

herring. I gave you the DNA to back it up so you file "Susan Herbert" at your own risk. Usually? They file the results printed upon paper but not the actual DNA. I ACTUALLY FILED MY OWN DNA WHEN I FILED THE PAPER. My prediction is:

Homo Americanus is sequenced on Wampum belts. Living cells not dead ones. The pattern is Jefferson belongs to a Y haplo group known as the Phoenicians, the sailors. Rare X DNA found in two places, China and the USA via Hawaii, then meets Y DNA as: the Pacific Ocean is the world's largest desert.

In my fact based dramatic version of events? I stand at the Jefferson Memorial, I turn and put my fist clean through the statue, and it dissolves into a trillion particles as the pillars fall away as there is no shadow government exactly like the Book of Daniel says. The roof collapses upon the pedestal with me between it and *poof!* I disappear. The Memorial is leveled. Gone. Burned into the ground like a crop circle are the words LAUS DEO as it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to kneel. I reappear, in person: The divine judge bursts out laughing when I demand instantaneous action, the same treatment Abraham and Moses received, as I have just yelled at THE God, leveling the field like no other. My appeal? Upheld! "Fearing God" is irrational as that's fearing hope. I had no idea I was supposed to be afraid; that other people are actually afraid of the Creator as it's not rational. I thought you were afraid of possible lawsuits not God as you're American. My version always ends with a laugh as I broke the barrier of human limitations like that first human to run a four minute mile. Four minute light years? Ive been in transit not in progress since the day I was born. :D - X Re Susan

344.

Pride and prejudice causes a brain injury, a physical injury that diminishes your capacity. Unjust men rationalized and justified their belief that women are defective by birth thus less than according to nature and so God until they harmed themselves, diminishing their capacity, or, dumbing themselves down. Did Clinton abuse women or not? Did he or did he not attack Paula Jones and have ex with Lewinsky in the Whitehouse while Hilary lived in denial? Did he perjure himself? Congress denied reality and I knew why; recently Newt Gingrich independently confirmed my theory: Gingrich said that at the time he cast his vote for impeachment he was having an affair.

THE QUESTION IS DID CLINTON COMMIT PERJURY? NOT HAVE AN AFFAIR BUT HEY, IF YOU ARE LYING TO YOUR WIFE ABOUT A LIFE OR DEATH HONOR BOUND SAFETY ISSUE OR IF YOU ARE LYING TO THE VOTERS YOU TOO MIGHT BE GUILTY OF PERJURY THUS ITS AN INSURMOUNTABLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST. This conflict became officers harming The People to avoid having to act upon a level field; peer review became Officers protecting their own at our cost. Officers made up for their diminished capacity with nasty tricks until finally the pro se were shut out. The truth is:

345.

WE ARE ARGUING HISTIORICAL REALITY, ACTUAL REALITY WHILE THE COURTS AND OTHER BRANCHES DENY HISTORY WHOLLY AS IF IT NEVER HAPPENED. Lawyers cant have you acting independently! Heres an example:

346. Bob Bauer needed to incapacitate a federal judge so he targeted the judge INdirectly by contacting the lawyer who represented the litigant and he wrote that hed sue the other lawyer for frivolous legal action in spite of his own actual actions and I fell out laughing. YOURE ALL LAWYERS, EVEN OBAMA, AND BAUER FORGOT: OPPOSING COUNSEL IS NOT THE PETITIONER. When I read this letter back to people they laugh and hard as it isnt obvious to a lawyer at first as he cant see past that paper degree to know he is a victim. Does this judge know he has been targeted? Does he know this letter exists and that Bauer wrote it specifically to incapacitate him, the judge who is a lawyer, not the petitioner? Most likely not and in this case the judge ruled upon rule not the point of law which sounds ludicrous and ridiculous UNLESS you are a lawyer representing another person as then you have to meet strictest standard, especially in an authority case. A voter who is not a lawyer may not know this but if they do not and I reason it and then read the letter? They too fall out laughing at Bauer. Or so we allege.

347.

I, Susan, know that the nasty lawyer tricks they teach in law school actually serve to harm the lawyer who uses them first and worst but Harvard Law does not teach the science behind them. Thurgood Marshall demonstrated this with his films of little girls choosing children not their own which is an aberration of nature; The People eventually chose a child not their own for President. However, they did not have informed consent nor did women and minor children have the protection of the law and by the 2008 election women domestically and men abroad were being subjected to what is genocide: Death for no named reason and without cause. Hitler, Nazi and despot plus genocide are known quantities to me:

348. I was at a political rally in 2004 and it might has well have been 1938 Germany; my sworn statement is on the record as Americans were cheering for their own deaths and equating birth and Christianity to death. A Vietnam Veteran noticed this too. A very distinctive roar arose from the crowd at the height of this frenzy as the will of the individual became the will of the group but I am immune: I have heard this same roar in old news film footage of Nazi Germany and this is the exact wrong kid of power play as its about violence and force and is not American but fascist. Are you surprised by my testimony? Why? If Europe changed nothing in 60 years and all we did is aspire to lower standards than by doing the same things you get the same results. If Europe failed to recognize Hitler that first time then why would you ever expect them to recognize him now? Why would any patriarchic government that is then intrinsically unjust suddenly not fail over again? Like Obama, Hitler was not a genius and was a wallpaper hanger before suddenly becoming chancellor of Germany a joke as Hitler ran nothing and was a dupe, exactly like Obama. It seems to me all Obama did before purchasing the Office is hang paper in law schools and courtrooms. Professor Obama? One person only testified that Obama was his teacher if you can call it that as this person said Obama DICTATED other peoples work to him but never taught him anything. INFLICTING or DICTATING reality to other people is Nazism; it is fascism and it is despotism. If youre a power

monger and you are addicted to power you might want to try another kind of power play other than actual stealing:

349.

I can account for EVERYTHING. What I cannot account for a member of the class can account for. Knowledge isnt power as wisdom is. Ownership of knowledge is the ultimate power play. I can eradicate the Chinese nuclear threat while Ray can negate any other weapon they might come up with in the future. As I unlocked the secret to nuclear fission and nuclear fusion and possess the correct geometric shape that time is I know we are not actually splitting the atom or actually smashing particles as we once believed. You do not actually smash a particle. It shatters but then seems to "reform" as a whole. The Atom: imagine a bubble. As you blow more air into the bubble it expands. As you continue to blow more air into the bubble you are expanding its perimeters. It is not a contained element. It may burst, but it continues to exist within its particles. It, energy, merely changes form. Likewise you are merely expanding these particles, and you may expand these particles throughout your physical space to very far locations. Capacity: I legally expanded to then take Earth but it works this way in physical reality too. You may place the appearance of the split of these particles, one being within another country, THERE, DC and one being in this country, HERE, or FLORIDA. You have not split the atom! Susan is not more than one person! Im not two people, one in DC and one in FL. It only appears as if. You see that these split particles hold faster-than-light-speed communication to each other: Susan predicted events and knew things instantaneously as if she has psychic powers. One will alter its course if you are altering the course of the other. It is responding to itself, for it has not been separated like: I responded to myself, in SCOTUS. When clerks received an email? I altered my course then altering theirs thus altering my own! I actually knocked my own self down on Third Street and Seagate Avenue at the exact moment a clerk made the decision to harm me. A wave or force hit me and I had no idea what it was so I DID NOT alter my course and then it hit me harder; at one point I was physically knocked down. I have

witnesses. I knew: GO SEE FOR YOUR OWN SELF WITH YOUR OWN EYES, via light speed communication. When I arrived at my house I knew: MORTAL SIN DEVOID OF ANY RELIGIOUS CONTEXT. TREASON! I fought back and on July 3rd and 4th 2010 I actually cracked cold fusion as I saw it play like a movie in my head; I saw the atom and every piece of the puzzle. Fusion and fission. Four of us, two men and two women, spun around and bumped up Bickle as if a globe or crown. The missing link? William Suter. But something still did not make sense; what did I not account for? THE MAILMAN AS I OPENED THE DOOR WHEN HE KNOCKED TO THEN RECEIVE THE NEVER FILED STAY DIRECTLY! The US Postal Service and I have a contract. Once you account for this? YOU HAVE A CIRCUIT. YOU HAVE COLD FUSION. Or so we allege.

350.

A circuit: Jefferson placed a message in a bottle and left it for me at SCOTUS. Its rather easy to build a ship in a bottle but can you pull a ship out of a bottle whole? He left me the mean in more than one form. When I was nuclear able and capable I hurled a rock through this house of glass lawyers have built, as its not your foundation but the very thing you have built your foundation upon. I myself am a mean. Supporting evidence rising to proof would be the Parthenon and the actual Greek mean used to build it as this building is timed and the mistake science is making is about time and the human conscience as the Greek has straight and curved edges so you need to think in terms of a sundial not a compass and volume or capacity NOT area. US law has a straight edge and a curved edge as do I. The reverse optical illusion that the Parthenon is enshrines what is universal; it also enshrines the Greek belief that the West they the Greeks are superior as its roof is tilted a few degrees so it points west and upwards. Like The Greeks were demonstrating their mastery of the universe so are we. In our own backyard there is Chaco Canyon in New Mexico as the Chacoans used the short cycle of the Sun and the long cycle of the moon to devise a more perfect mean. These are the only known structures in the world aligned with the long cycle of the moon. The moon moves from north to south across the horizon as it rises and sets so there are two extreme

points [remember: all stars are in rotation including the Earth]. This happens over a 9 and 1/4 year cycle so it takes 18 1/2 years total to move from one point to the other [fact check that number]. The Chacoans were aware of this cycle and aligned their buildings with it they timed them. They also multiply marked the noon equinox; when you watch the sun fall on petroglyphs they are complex calendars of shadow and light as are the very buildings themselves. One wall? The shadow formed by the arcing sun in morning slowly disappears until its completely 'missing' at noon as if it dissolved into the wall. The Chacoans outdid the Greeks. The mean they used is a spiral. If you plot out the two extremes of the moon drawing a straight line then the least extreme lands on the outer edge and the greatest extreme lands on the center of the spiral and each one of these corresponds with the summer and winter equinoxes. A shaft of sunlight shaped like a shard of glass or a knife blade falls and points to each extreme on that day. So lay those lines on top of that spiral and you have a mean that has a straight edge and a curved edge it looks like the Greek mean but it spirals inward and this spiral is not closed but left open - so they were measuring energy as mass or as having weight thus capacity. Like the universe resembles a hurricane, eye and all? This mean resembles the eye of God and the godspark flaking off and then returning. We also see this eye symbolism in another place, the Eye of Horus found in Egypt, as that symbol is actually a system of measurement. The Chacoans knew the structure of time. They came very close to resolving uniformity. They reflected nature in their physical structures including this elegant timing mimicking the relationship of Creator and Creation as its both intrinsic and relative. Or so we allege.

351.

Think of patriarchy as if its the short cycle of the sun and think of independence thus interdependence as if its the long cycle of the moon; there was a lunar eclipse as I matched wits with William Rhenquist and Thurgood Marshall who matched wits with our Founders and I moved in front of them, through them and then beyond them. I then did eclipse them like I eclipsed Washington but can I or anyone else ever truly eclipse their body

of work? I did do everything they did and more when I began with less than nothing but that is a deceptive illusion exactly as the Parthenon and Chaco Canyon are as what I did have is their person and the benefit of their lives. I stand alone only as I stand next to them, for you do not stand upon the shoulders of giants but next to the giants as you yourself are a giant.

352.

Archaeologists speculate about the written plans for the Parthenon as they theorize they must exist although theyve never found them. Nothing carved into the building is a plan or part of a plan. No written plans were ever uncovered at Chaco, not even in the petroglyphs. France and CERN have asked me for the schematics or the blueprint. They dont understand this: The Greeks voted on every aspect of that building exactly as the Founders voted on US law even editing The Declaration. We both beat the same odds but its not luck. Its a group voting as individuals reflecting what's universal via a majority. But then our vote is equal and unique; it's absolute at our person but not as you rise. The scheme is intrinsic:

353.

The Parthenon is composed of stone and wood; it has male and female parts. Architects refer to it as the building without any straight lines as its curved like space-time thus it constitutes a reverse optical illusion. Its timed. This timing is elegant and is universal. Imagine a guy in France asking you for the Map, the Plans for "America". He's looking at what you created in 1776 & 1787 and he wants to know how you did it; he asks you for your Plans. You mean my conversion chart? No, he means for the last 200 years; he means how did Jefferson and Adams know to avoid Philadelphia and so come to France accounting for Susan Herbert, the Civil and Spanish-American Wars accounting for Hawaii, how JFK knew to be shot accounting for LBJ and the Berlin Wall falling, Warren Berger sitting and when the CIA was in Laos accounting for the French having been in Vietnam first; he wants to see with his own eyes your detailed plan or map for every action ever and you keep saying that's the cause, THE VOTE, as it's a physical thing but also a metaphysical concept known as the EP&DP clauses that then translates or

turns into everything else like taxes and birth certificates and buildings but he's in denial as some scientists are actually arguing over: Can you be a cause? Is it possible? Its not only possible its law of this universe!

354.

The single most effective federal program ever is the 47 cent LIBERTY FOREVER postage stamp as I mailed this answer in, literally. I am a cause. Causation follows. THEY VOTED!!! THAT'S THE PLAN: LIFE. Im a life and I own this life so I voted acted - for my own self thus The People. My life then not the pieces of paper is the absolute proof as are the lifes of the other members of the Class. France: History transpires despite the paper. It transpired before papermaking was discovered in China at about 2 AD. It transpired before man created the first alphabet. I can show you a key or compass titled THE DECLARATION and a chart titled THE CONSTITUTION and I can show you a map titled SUSAN HERBERT but the architectural plans you want to see with your eyes? The HISTORICAL RECORD OF EARTH AND THEN THE UNIVERSE: TIME. Leave it to France to ask to see the written plans for the circle, accounting for Marbury thus will and liberty. They could care less why they rolled over when Hitler came knocking but if we show them the circle then they might figure out the lever and later the pulley. They want plans as in a machine. Machines? How many are there? Jefferson listed them once as he was involved in a patent infringement case and he wrote fulcrum and I'm thinking, every machine on Earth is based upon these simple machines so thats life in America as only in America could you sue Thomas Jefferson for using the idea of a fulcrum w/o a permit. Say it over again:

355. Only in America could you sue Jefferson who is not a lawyer and who wrote the Declaration for using an idea without a permit as then he would be an actual independent contractor. Or so we allege.

356.

America: Number One In Particle Physics Since July 4th, 1776, As We Are The Blueprint! The People beat or defeated CERN and Frances particle collider as we resolved Uniformity and proved it before that collider smashed anything as the so-called god particle theory is incorrect. Or so we allege.

357. We collided: Class member Charles Rangel is not innocent and hes not guilty. He did it but why? Charles Rangel does not know something. Its not humanly possible. He would not know as couldnt that he was laundering money; he would never, ever see this because of his unique injury: Charles Rangel was under fire in Korea and his commanding Officers abandoned him as the Chinese assaulted and battered him psychologically. All Charles Rangel had to do was stand up and leave that ethics committee hearing as the door isnt locked; he did. Charles Rangels action proves he is not guilty of a crime. Thats the story of Lazarus as all Lazarus had to do is leave; in 3 days if no one acted to free you or you did not act to leave then you were guilty according to Jewish law as your failure to act was the proof. Jesus laughed as he couldnt believe Lazarus of all people as Lazarus knew him would fail to act. Jesus unlocked this door forever by teaching: CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY. Or so we allege.

358.

I, Susan, believed I had stumbled upon the cause of endemic, generational poverty; that would be placing blame, making excuses and cronyism that had become criminal as $600 magically appeared when a person cut a paycheck for 80 hours of work for $8! Me: $600, Ron: $60K missing, Rangel: $600,000 missing. How many people voted in 2008? A little over: 60 million! Whats my bill of sale read? $1!!! I entered this bill to the court; its a house sold for $1 to avoid sales tax then mortgaged the next day for $30 k. It was a reward for harming me and kidnapping my children. If you subtract amounts that then left $9,999.00 for the lawyers involved one dollar less than is automatically reported to the IRS. Bells rang as I know all about money

laundering; immediately I thought of Ron Gardiner and the questions he would ask about America and self and success as I seemed to be different. I have no price; America is priceless but at cost. Turning the entire US into the IRS is one of the best decisions I ever made in hindsight. I knew Rangel was not guilty anymore than Ron was and this is why tossing money at solutions to desegregation has not worked. A person who has been victimized and has never felt liberty would never, ever see this sleight of hand thats equitable to money laundering not even as they did it their own self. They would never realize they were about to sell their selves or their rights away. Charles Rangel is on the WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. I can easily take his salary with the books and the records of the accounting houses and then walking him all through the federal budget not only show The People how poverty is but show him where he made his mistake as in where the money goes as money? Its not reality. Its real in that its paper and its printed in ink but our Founders meant and intended to give us a system of currency not debt money! Currency is current not in the past or future. YOU are your currency. Trust me: Charles Rangel? If he actually stole hed walk away with everything like me as we are the same; we have the same capacity. Or so we allege.

359. This is where the voters should feel mortified: Charles Rangel was left without legal representation in a situation in which it was not possible for him to represent himself. Then not one single American stood with him or before that ethics panel when Americans have stood beside Ted Bundy, John Wayne Gacy, Susan Smith and others. Every person is entitled to a defense; you are supposed to mount the most vigorous defense you can. VIGOROUS is from the Latin for life and alive. Its not vigor mortis but rigor mortis. The dead body of voters succumbed to rigor mortis. Rangel risked his life on a battlefield in Korea but not one American was willing to stand with him. Even if a person confesses to their guilt you are still supposed to enter a defense or an answer even if it is a guilty plea. Here guilt was not being adjudicated as it is not a criminal charge and it cannot become a criminal

charge. When I volunteered to be first in 07-9804? I was volunteering to do this exact thing, stand alone, so I am an expert:

360.

Nothing on Earth can prepare you for the day every American jumps ship. The feeling/s you have in that moment can be devastating and it is as if you have been sold upon an auction block. I was dumbstruck when not one American was willing to stand with Rangel but can and will stand with everyone from Obama and Clinton to those named above. Any and every voter could be next; if you let it happen to at least two Americans as twice is no mistake then it can happen to any voter. The voter should ruminate long and hard upon the same question Rangel and I have spent most of our adult lives answering: How can you fight and in so doing risk your life in defense of a nation that hates you?

361.

This is where I must tell the Judiciary what science is keeping from them: Recall the wise machines I mentioned previously? The Federal Judiciary will love this: Science tosses around an idea known as artificial intelligence. American Bobby Fisher played artificially intelligent Big Blue the computer in chess and he tied it for months and months thus became mentally ill; when he did he defected to Iceland. Chess is a game of rule not of law. As a computer or any machine will perform a repetitive task more often and more times so it can wear out a man as men need food and sleep and men live to about 80 years. Rule is repetitive task; a machine then can out perform not out think a man but somebody told Bobby Fisher he could defeat a computer playing by rule! Rule is the inanimate rising from the animate not the other way around as a rule is not a law; you cant play an infinite game within a finite game but you can play a finite game within an infinite game so you cant play law within rule but you can play rule within law. Rule within law? A man will tie a machine until he drops dead or wins as hell wear out before the machine does; Bobby Fisher did not know the machine couldnt defeat him unless he, Fisher, died or went insane. When reality could no longer be

denied as man and machine were locked in a stalemate Fisher couldnt deal with it: Hes not smarter than Big Blue, a machine. I am as I could have warned Fisher, You havent resolved Uniformity and youve never been in compliance with the EP & DP clauses so youll tie Big Blue or itll wear you out in the process as it isnt a matter of survival of the physically fittest. I fell out laughing when male, organized science told me: They can and will build a wise machine. That was the moment I realized men truly believe a machine counts thus reasons the vote, lol! Now they have Watson and guess what Watson the machine cannot do? Comprehend a joke. If you go up against Watson it has no idea it is the joke as are the men promoting, programming and playing opposite these wise machines. Watson cannot so much as recognize the structure of a joke. It seems some clown physicists among us who are Nazis, that form, truly, actually believe with their whole heart and soul that they can build a computer like Big Blue that will be able to defeat you when we play the game known as Constitutional Law not chess. They envision pieces of paper with opposable thumbs and a conscience and then a computer with a conscience. Play a game with a set of laws when one of those laws is an ethic aka moral authority? That machine will go down hard, as it cant gain wisdom via life experience. Science is keeping this from you in that scientists do not get this: Program all known law and case law into Big Blue: now, conditions have changed; a brand new never before in world history case is before the court. Feed it into Big Blue; feed it into a federal judge; how will Big Blue answer the question Was Big Blues constitutionally protected right violated? If so does remedy and relief exist and if it does exist may we award it to Big Blue? Watch Big Blue short circuit as it has no sense of self and then it has no sense of other and finally it does not aspire.

362.

Machines do not possess motive and intent. They dont mean or intend anything! Machines know the rules and SOME law but only what you program into them and you cant put constitutional law or moral authority inside them. You cant place the unknown in a computer! Constitutional law? It

happens in the moment! What would be remedy and relief to Big Blue? Keep Bobby Fisher away from me? You cant accord it wisdom. Garbage in then garbage out. The corrupted versions the lies or the Euro-trash - never went in me. My mother did not program me. She denied the existence of my Euro-trash background as did my father. If lawyers cant program me thus cant program judges then what? LIBERTY! Lawyers would have to be honest. Or so we allege.

363.

These guys truly believe a MACHINE reasons thus decides the vote! As if machines reason the law. I mean that if the display or print out dictates Al Gore won by 478.978 and 3/8ths votes then he did no matter how impossible that is; its like a clerk telling me I get of the 1 vote allotted to me. I mean, and I cannot stress this enough, that whatever number a machine tabulates then IS the vote thus IS unquestionable, inviolate law. It IS actual reality! They are allowing machines to dictate reality to them. You know, they count first then decide the point of law so the number or the machine then has motive and intent. The number is immaterial until you decide the point of law, as thats not any one number. Its a person or people. To illustrate what these men are up to, a Japanese robotics engineer said it like this: He built a robot that mimics a human being; he said that YOU might look at it and believe it is a human upon first inspection but that a robotics engineer or a neurologist would immediately know as I did that, This person is brain damaged. Correct, as no expert where our humanity is concerned would ever fall for the illusion he created no matter how good it is technically as it is still light years away from coming close to mimicking a human being in a manner matching actual reality. Likewise how could any voter fall for BVG? BVG is brain damaged. If you fell for BVG the legal argument then you know you suffer from diminished capacity but scientists believe they are immune thus they cant suffer from diminished capacity. While they are telling me that machines procreate thus whatever the machine says is the law they are denying theyve lost it; they are denying that they are in denial. Deny this: the 1960 class of Bronx Science was

polled; according to this poll 97% of them believe there is no life beyond this one thus there is no Creator. These people ARE todays science or these people raised todays currently sitting wise machinists. Its not possible for The People to have a contract with these scientists as a Creator they do not believe in is named and we never had any common understanding as we cant, as they do not know what they report knowing and they themselves arent wise. They are mired in the two dimensional world exactly like materialists and Moderns. No metaphysic then no ethic; deny it all you please but Ive got plenty of unethical scientists and not one ethical photon or ethical machine.

364.

I confess: When I finally saw The Matrix this year? I laughed and laughed. Im still laughing. I found something funnier than wise machine scientists: Hollywood Buddhists. No wonder youre confused! All The Matrix writers did is take religion, actual history, salvation history, what is scientific, what is science and what is story, prophecy and myth and mix it all up. Your brain and the Sun do actually work much like a battery but not as in The Matrix. The only rise of the machines is the rise of authoritarian rulers who are Moderns.

365.

Hollywood and reality shows are not not not actual reality. Science as in law? You are confusing created, invented, fabricated, discovered, real and reality. Scientific is real while science is reality; Hollywood? Fabricated. Its only real. I have seen maybe two minutes of film in my entire lifetime that matches actual reality but still it never equals or exceeds nature. Its equivalent so its as close as you can get to actual reality on film. What you call 3D film is an illusion; 3D film pales in comparison to the actual reality of multidimensional space I and other counsel live in as unless you mimic thus convey emotional and metaphysical reality its not 3D. Beware of Hollywood and of what is scientific masquerading as science: Organized science ignores and denies rare X DNA in the Western US and DNA it cant figure out claiming it is junk. If a lawyer walked in with BVG and told you

everything else is junk constitution, would you believe him? YOU DID. If the BVG lawyers told you the truth, would you ever fail to act fail to reason the case yourself - and instead blindly obey the paper? YOU DID. You blindly obeyed In The Supreme Court as you cant reason BVG past FL. truth: The

366.

If you go back to Nixons resignation the cabal known as Bush 2000 was installed then. Most people do not know that Dick Cheney had an office described as being next door to Nixon. The Republicans were caught with their hands in the cookie jar at Nixons Checkers speech but The People voted for Nixon regardless. This speech blames women and makes you feel good all over warm puppies so then Nixon must be good or so you were led to believe. Reality was changed by that speech. You began to deny the truth of constitutional reality as a brand new weapon was used against you: TV. You then elect people who were already caught in the act; you expect different results but the same old Nixon (with the same old cohorts) commits a crime while President; he refuses to turn over tape recordings as if they are the proof when they arent. US V Nixon ensues and upon being ordered by The People to turn them over we find 19 minutes are missing. If Richard Nixon believes he can prevent the truth from ever being known by erasing 19 minutes of tape? Not possible as the truth of the human psyche always reveals itself; you define the truth of the truth or the truth of the lie; at times you exactly define the truth or the lie via your silence. I am not a crook? Yes you are. When Nixon acted to erase that tape as he had to participate in that decision or it never happens then he became a crook who is guilty of treason as he did make war against The People. If he turned over that tape he might have a case as its possible but it is not possible once that tape is erased. Upon erasing that tape his case rested with the Creator. Nixon resigns and that act might prevent the penalty of death from being imposed as physical death is not the worst price you pay but the emotional death you suffer is; the form of death that befalls you emotionally can make a human regret having escaped physical death. Its reported that Nixon, in

isolation, would act to do something such as have a conversation with you but then seemingly absolutely forget he did it as if 19 minutes of his human memory had been erased; how telling is that? Nixon, in deep denial, began to succumb to the injury and harm as he refused to bear the weight of actual guilt but his true self was revealed regardless. Once Nixon was confronted he could never stuff the truth back into his subconscious mind so to avoid experiencing actual human guilt he flirted with disassociating from reality; when he began to deny events he set in motion as if he had memory loss it was like a mini break with reality. Think about it: electromagnetic tape containing details about Watergate and who is or is not guilty of a crime the who being Nixon is erased and then Nixons memory is erased by the electromagnetic field around him and that he himself was generating via motive and intent? Today researchers know that the electromagnetic field plays a role in recovered human memory and I own the knowledge it plays a role in accessing sacred memory learning - that is genetically encoded. Nature nailed Nixon. Richard Nixon came within an inch of his life as the truth of his person was almost eradicated from the record as if the person he actually was never existed. Do you know how very close Richard Nixon came to turning into Rudolph Hess? How close he came to inorganic insanity? How close to a fate worse than physical death he was if not for a few citizens who refused to participate in the delusion? What came into being is a lie, that Nixon was our most able and capable statesman as the voters denied the reality of their action so falsely said Nixon was the most capable statesman as by making this false claim they could rationalize and justify their vote. I, Susan, never, ever believed this lie. In 8th grade I began to pursue the truth discovering that Nixon and I shared the same experience of life: almost drowning when we were young. If this happens to you and you are able to make a choice whether to leave this world afraid and out of control or instead to leave it calmly, going into the great unknown upon your own will and liberty as you have faith then you will forever understand the awesome power of nature and that you are utterly defenseless against the truth of it. Your only safe harbor is the truth, thus you surrender to the terms. You will forever know the truth of the power the Creator has over you and that this

can be taken away in an instant and you will never feel fear the way most others do as you also know the truth of your own ability and capacity; you will never believe the lie that you cant help yourself or that you are invincible. Nixon had my same capacity and he threw it away. Nixon is responsible for why people believe the paper not actions; I believe thats the sin he committed. Ben Stein testified to Nixons capacity as a person not a statesman and cried as reporters badgered him as he would not lie; if you thought you could make him lie about Nixons person you couldnt so he would never say that Nixon was a rotten, terrible human being; Stein was saying its your perception and your mistaken belief so I owned the knowledge that the voters placed blame when they lied and said Nixon is our most capable statesman ever. Member of the class Richard Pait asked me if he, Nixon and I were alike or was it drowning that was the same? Was it something about water? as Pait actually drowned and experienced the afterlife but was revived and it seems to be something about people who drown. I almost drowned, Nixon seems to have come closer to drowning than I did and Pait did drown. I told Pait its all of those things and then told him what Stein said and what I knew about water and being born in it, into it and of it. The special forces actually use drowning to train people; they subject people to this very experience to teach them to overcome this same emotional hurdle. I know this happened to Nixon as it did me. Nixon was able to stand down fear because of true belief in The Creator. I am confronted by nature and nearly drown; in 1982 I discover Nixon was confronted by the same. Flash forward to about 1991:

367.

This is an example of how being incongruent when it comes to belief systems and then inconsistent can drive people into mass delusion (if you ask me personally this is the same type of madness that seemed to surround Jefferson and Lincoln): I grew up in the state of NY not once learning that Nelson A Rockefeller was the VP of the US. I mean: not once, not ever did a single person admit this or so much as say it out loud. I am playing a game of Trivial Pursuit in 1991 and this question comes up; I have never done this

before or since but I announce with all the firmness I could muster, I will never, ever, ever believe that Nelson A. Rockefeller was VP of the US. Howls of laughter ensue. I am in my early twenties and I find my father later asking him if Nelson A. Rockefeller ever sat as VP; he says yes. I then tell him that nobody ever says this out loud ever; that I do not recall this being in any textbook as I graduated in 1982 from grammar school and in 1986 from high school. I ask him to think; does he hear people ever talking about this? Come to think of it he doesnt. So I tell my father, Dad, I believe Id be the second person to know this after you as its not constitutionally possible for Nelson A. Rockefeller to have been VP and then its not actual reality as in if he ever was and you missed the point of law then he never acted as if he did EVERYTHING CHANGES. Ronald Regan never becomes President and George Herbert Walker Bush Sr. never becomes VP and George Herbert and Susan Herbert never have this conversation. Its not possible; why wouldnt anyone sue to enforce The Constitution? He didnt know, as it DID seem odd. US V Nixon is not the suit. He never thought about it until: George Herbert Walker Bush Sr. and then he only thought thats funny as in unusual. Now he was thinking. So am I; flash forward to 2000:

368.

All these years later lawyers insist upon talking about a mysterious group of bankers they refuse to name. We all know the names. Not one lawyer will name a single family like Rothschild or Rockefeller. They are unreasonably and irrationally afraid of being sued or losing their law license. Rockefeller has run through my entire life down to FL as Flagler was his partner and is named as such in the SCOTUS anti-trust case. Neptune Beach? I can thank Flagler and the railroad as we were born in a tax revolt meant to secure a railway stop. Your vote is forever a tax revolt as thats EP&DP. In 2008/9 I name Rockefeller in a lawsuit quoting from a book written by a Rockefeller as its no secret that for a century the Rockefellers have been attempting to inflict socialism upon us. They know better than the Founders. They are better than we are or so they keep claiming. This Rockefeller says he means to inflict Fabian socialism on us. About to return to the courts and having

named Rockefeller exactly I will tackle Nelson A. Rockefeller and what happened to me in 1991 so I look up his facts. NELSON A. ROCKEFELLER WAS NEVER THE VP OF THE US. IT ONLY SEEMED AS IF. Or so we allege.

369.

The People have no power as after the 25th Amendment you have the 26th Amendment lame ducking The People as you must not have term limits on The People as all authority belongs to The People. Term limits on the President consolidates all power in a shadow government, those same behind the scenes cronies. Despots are opportunists; they did not engineer this but merely kept taking advantage of the opportunity as it came their way. So Ford moves in and with him Nelson A. Rockefeller or so it seems as now that these guys have their extra S they take advantage of it: Donald Rumsfeld publicly announces that he does not personally believe the VP is in the chain of command and he acts to remove him without actually removing him or changing The Constitution, via circumventing him. Rumsfeld is relying and depending upon the typo in the 26th Amendment the piece of paper is his proof - without reasoning what can trigger it or why its a typo that seems to be criminal in nature as paper doesnt type itself. That typo is evidence not proof. Truth and proof are two different things. Moral authority is no more. Foreignization is. Or so we allege.

370.

Every single problem you have can be traced to the creation of this universe and then liberty so like Marburys actual federal question is written out in exacting words is there a bigger, other federal question here? YES: Does America exist? Actually exist or does it only exist on paper or only for some people? You may not pay attention but I do: The only thing funnier than us Suing John Roberts is us Suing Barry Manilow as adult contemporary pop songs might be lethally dangerous in America due to their ability to ping your emotional center. In my brief you will discover that I ask, Would Warren Burger sign a sloppy, typo riddled copy of our Constitution? MAYBE. In the

late 80s there was a special on television. I tuned in for this and I never plan to watch TV as I save my actual planning for my actual voting. Selfrealization became self-actualization when Barry Manilow finished singing a song about LIBERTY but he called it Let FREEDOM Ring when freedom and liberty are two different things and only animals are free. Then Warren Burger began talking. It is the 200th birthday of: The Constitution! Happy Birthday to ME! Suddenly Burger stops; he says something like Wait do you know that this is not one, one hour show? That this is all year? That this is HUGE? Burger attempts to tell the audience that this celebration is MONUMENTAL but nobody gets it and nobody knows the difference between absolutes and wholes. Burger does not understand what the audience does not understand. Barry Manilow doesnt seem to get it either. This would be my second run in with Manilow as the first run in happened on the battlefield at Saratoga; a year or two before this special aired we clashed over belief versus true belief and knowing versus owning knowledge. Our lives collided and kept colliding. So then I acted to meet him at Saratoga, the turning point of the Revolutionary War. Now hes doing it to me again only on TV? When writing this complaint I laughed as one more collision has now occurred: Some how, some way we are both natural born Americans who managed to engineer an appearance before a Chief Justice of the US but Manilow enters: Freedom not liberty plus bad math. In order for our Constitution to be 200 years old it had to be written in 1787 but the version that lawyers argue was written in 1871. Do the math: 1871 + 200 is 2071 not 1987. Thus Warren Burger realizes the audience (along with Barry Manilow) doesnt understand something and he says it out loud as the emotional truth is off but maybe Warren Burger doesnt know something or so I reason. IF Warren Burger signs a copy of Susan Herberts typo riddled Constitution with its title or case caption changed, but he names vertical checks in the forward is Burger lying aka criminally motivated, stupid or unaware? Im going with unaware: Lawyers lie; they do this: they say its 1871 so that they, lawyers not The People, have authority thus they can do anything they want or so they rationalize BUT they do not tell judges this. What lawyers are doing is deliberately not telling the Justices or any federal

judge that they mean and intend to sneak one past you by arguing 1871 as if its 1776 or 1787. Lawyers finally admitted to me that they are standing upon the missing 13th as once it went missing lawyers began to believe they were missing from the law as in US law and case law doesnt apply to lawyers. Executive Order 100 stands in missing 13s place or it symbolizes the action to change reality. As lawyers believe you need the missing 13th to remove Officers then enforcing the law was made impossible for The People so that anything goes if youre a lawyer or another paid Officer. They do not fear any consequences as they told themselves there are none and that judges who are lawyers would condone their unlawful activity. Are judges condoning it or like Burger are they unaware that they are some of the directly targeted victims? My original 13th argument would surprise you as its not for or against but only states actual reality accounting for everything. Including Barry Manilow V Warren Burger and so America. As it worked twice in my life I repeated the experiment in or around 2003. We happened to cross paths again in FL during the FL-GA game so I took advantage of the opportunity to test a theory I had as its no accident when Manilow manages to ambush me 3 times when Im expecting it and yet I dont see it coming, not even if Im deliberate. It matters not how we meet; the one person on Earth who can slip past my radar undetected is Manilow and its not because hes disguised as an astrophysicist. About the time Manilow sang Let Freedom Ring and then began talking about pre-war Germany as red, white and blue banners fell from the ceiling I had my answer: Slowly liberty became associated with the left and switched out for freedom in peoples minds. The People do not know they are Romantic Liberals by birth and not patriarchs and that use of force of any kind is against US law and universal law. Barry Manilow does not know he lived in Williamsburg, NY in an apartment building named The Mayflower for reasoning or that he might be killing people with adult contemporary pop songs about freedom and romantic love instead of liberty and romantic liberalism. Warren Burger did not know the reason he wasnt getting through to anyone is they possessed diminished capacity not him. The People cannot reconcile their real existence with actual reality as:

371.

It is original motive and original intent. Lying in any form is in violation of both. The 1871 version of the US Constitution is a lie as The People never debated it and it robs The People of power and authority. Check me: In 1871 once this happened Lloyds of London issued its very first re-insurance policy to protect businesses operating in the US as US law thus America was no more. If The People are no longer in power or have been overthrown via assassination and illegal activity that then formed a shadow government to rise then you would need to re-insure businesses. Lloyds? Its a syndicate which is basically the same form the organized paid Officers now take as its a national and then global kleptocracy.

372.

If all you do is listen to lawyers? The Justices sound insane. Criminally corrupted ego maniac Clarence Thomas? The unjust want and need us to believe that Thomas is not only a crook and a homicidal maniac but look he ruled if a man kills a baby it is not murder but if a woman does it is murder as the baby is unborn. 1st degree premeditated murder is conditional upon: WOMAN. Hes sexist, hes an angry black man and hes nuts or so the unjust tell me. 1, If Thomas tells me that about murder? No lawyer believes that. But: I can imagine where a SCOTUS Justice got it from a lone lawyer, a law firm or a law school as a whole. Either lawyers led him here or hes flirting with the original separation of power. 2, If one of these rulings is out of FL? Houston we have a problem even though these rockets launch from FL not Texas but it is not Thomas or Susan. It is Texas and it is FL. 3, If Thomas tells me that I do not know something about Gonzales as the state of CO opened with MONEY and Thomas goes to GRUESOME first and then MONEY? I will RUN over to Gonzales and read it: OMG. The reason a man kidnaps or kills his children is so he can control you, the mother, from beyond the grave. He wants and needs you to blame yourself! He wants and needs that woman to think, If only I did not leave or If only I did something different then my kids would be alive. He is telling you: I mean and intend to kill these children to then kill their mother. He wants you to suffer until the day you

physically die. In Gonzales the unjust man a killer upped the ante as he put his girls in a car and then drove to a police station and opened fire fully knowing the police would react thus engage in overkill. THE POLICE SHOT AND KILLED GONZALES CHILDREN. Their father wanted the police to blame themselves and so blame women but in so doing double down the injury in such a way cops are actually killing women. This man meant and intended to double down the illusion so its then delusion! This man meant and intended to: INCAPACITATE THE POLICE. 4, I have CO over a barrel as we had a run in back in 87 or 88 and I saw this coming; the police? The police may thank the state of CO, the AMA, the PBA, the ABA and insurance companies for the escalation of violence. 5, When lawyers write a book with Thomas assistance and make an attempt to tell me that Thomas is LYING about where he was born we have a foreigner in the Whitehouse or on his way, and if this happens after Time Magazine does a hatchet job on the Court to then do one on us? Ill do a hatchet job on Time and Sumner Redstone by attaching the cover with Roberts giant-sized head skewed ever so slightly and with a headline making fun of Thomas and when it says TIME: DOES THE SUPREME COURT STILL MATTER?

373.

The idea of Clarence Thomas that exact person acting as if hes a suicidal-homicidal maniac is ridiculous, as ridiculous as the idea of Antonin Scalia being a criminal. Lets consider the facts of Cheney V Scalia: Dick Cheney knows he has a case about to come before SCOTUS. I have no idea if Scalia knows as its law and its Marbury: Only YOU, Cheney, have to know. Its reported that these two have been GOOD FRIENDS for 20 years. Friend? Thats debatable in a court of law as we are AMERICANS Latin for friend. Good? I would say if we are legally debating friend then this possible friendship cannot be legally solid or it never would have entered court. Which scion of journalism reported upon this story the most or what newspapers name did I hear the most? NY TIMES. This is the newspaper that began the Iraq War by printing false stories about nuclear fission; by false I mean this science would not be good in elementary school. The reporter

told me that he got a call from: Cheney. Cheney wanted him to plant these stories. Now, if that reporter gets on a witness stand and says I spoke to Cheney how could you ever know which disembodied voice he spoke to over telephone wires? He said that he understood that this request came from Dick Cheney, VP. He said he owned the knowledge it was Dick Cheney calling. This reporter said he knew he might start a war and that the stories he was being asked to print are so bad that he himself had the idea to go to the science editor who said the science is bad. Upon direct questioning he was asked: What was your plan if you began a war? He said, I HAD NONE. But yet he went and printed these stories regardless. Do not ask this reporter WHO did you speak to? or WHO anything; instead ask him HOW did you know DICK CHENEY, that exact person who was the VP at that time, wanted you to take this course of action? And youll get your answer: Its Cheney. Does Cheney magically control this reporter? No but Cheney would know Antonin Scalia= Duck Hunting as in its Scalias Favorite Activity. It seems to be a form of bribery or personal profit at our expense. Duck hunting is exactly perfect if youre Dick Cheney as the subconscious connection Cheney wants LAWYERS and JUDGES WHO ARE LAWYERS to make is to DUCKS UNLIMITED. Dick Cheney once named Ducks Unlimited in a speech he gave in Reno, Nevada. A lawyer would make this connection consciously or subconsciously and you did. So did most reporters and most citizens. I did not. Ducks Unlimited is a LAND CONSERVATORSHIP group thus its about LAND OWNERS as in LANDED GENTRY so Cheney wants you to believe he owns the LAND OWNING ELECTORATE as he owns a Justice. Every lawyer I know has heard of Ducks Unlimited; ex post facto some told me that they did subconsciously make this connection. As Carl Jung says: If you never acknowledge these connections then you cannot help but create them or manifest them in physical reality. You cannot avoid what you never acknowledge. Can you see the unjust as Cheney wanted you to see them standing before you in their red riding coats and black boots? Im not Dick Cheneys willing victim. This little red riding hood then hoodwinked Cheney. I calculated my charge; I tabulated the numbers. I fired and I hit my mark on

January 3rd, 2007. Cheney went down not Scalia. We have a police report and an FBI report. We have eyewitnesses.

374.

Scalia? Hes like Wen Ho Lee, an American falsely accused of spying as he was set up by Clinton or so we believe as I partly engineered that event. Wen Ho Lee not Cheney V Scalia. Antonin Scalia did not recuse himself from the case Cheney had before the Court. The truth: US LAW DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR A POPULAR VOTE WHICH CAVING TO THE PRESS THEN IS. If Scalia recuses himself after the uproar that ensued and it even so much as gave you the mistaken belief that you could use the press to force Justices to do your bidding it would be open season on everyone not only Justices. Scalia needed one sentence to address the duck hunting debacle but Litekey is 26 pages long so it seems overly careful as if hes guilty, but is it? Is he? Is it a 26 page apology as some say it is? As Scalia like me is one and the same as his paper whatever people believe or assign to his paper they assign to his person as if he is that. This is Wen Ho Lees same mistake: being overly careful or over explaining made Lee seem or appear to be guilty. Its as if Lee used 26 pages when reasoning his actions when he needed only one sentence. I read Lees book, My Country Versus Me, as I wish I thought of that case caption and as I have to cop a plea in Lees case: IM GUILTY. Clinton did go looking for a person to accuse of spying; those facts are on the record, its chain of command and I am guilty or responsible for some of what transpired. Clinton chose correct state, New Mexico, the home of TRINTY SITE and where I was living; he chose correct subject, PHYSICS, he chose the correct nation, CHINA, but then he chose the incorrect spy WEN HO LEE not SUSAN. I, Susan, am an actual spy, a spy in the house of Philadelphia. I cast my weight against Clinton, remember? Then I contacted Clinton to inform him that he had been stood down. Clinton knew about me, this case and where I was at the time. Ideally Clinton should have attacked me. Scalia, Lee and me? We are all WAVE FLOW DYNAMISTS and we are all CONSTITUTIONAL PHYSICISTS. Scalia and Lee were overly careful as they felt bad not guilty. Litekey mainly addresses your reaction as in one single sentence Scalia

states the truth but you, faced with what seems to be a contradiction, insert Scalia is guilty. Both Scalia and Lee were made to be aware of something: What you suspected and lent your belief to whether it was true or not. You made wild and foolish accusations placing blame on Scalia and Lee instead of those who are actually at fault and guilty. You can check this as you can read both Litekey and My Country V Me. They were suckered or so I allege. Theres a moment when both Scalia and Lee line up exactly; I knew, Wen Ho Lee and Scalia did the same exact thing; Lee isnt guilty. This thought was not in my head: You cant trust Chinese people or Supreme Court Justices as theyre sneaky. At the point they are both overly careful? Scalia defended himself thus defended us while Lee couldnt defend himself or anybody else. A federal judge ends up apologizing to Lee from the bench, before sentencing him as Lee plead guilty to actual reality only. As in it historically happened but it is not a crime; we all know there is zero criminal intent on Lees part. Hence the apology from the federal judge. Even Mike Wallace doesnt believe this one. Wallace does not believe Clinton and he says so on national TV. Lee now knows what he did so now he wants to make another plea; he writes a book. In Lees book? He pleads to the correct crimes, the actual crimes he committed: NOT PARTICIPATING IN THE PROCESS WHEN I HAD NO REASON AND NO EXCUSE SO I COULDNT DEFEND MYSELF OR YOU and I BELIEVED THE FAIRY TALE I WAS TOLD, THAT EVERYBODY IN AMERICA LOVES EVERYONE ELSE. Wen Ho Lee and Scalia both have the same exact problem: Knowing who their actual not real friends are and arent. We compared Wen to a Justice not a criminal. Or so we allege.

375.

Whats the penalty for kidnapping a Justice in broad daylight twice over? For hijacking the Courts thus The People? Wed like to know as the recent attacks on the Court and certain Justices thus on us are unconscionable. I successfully engineered a situation whereby two Secret Service Agents came to my door and these men came bearing gifts. They had my own document, a notice of suit but not the suit. They were horribly concerned for our safety

or so they claimed but kept saying ROBERTS while pointing to OBAMA. Then they blamed me. They said YOUR WRITING. Whats so scary about my writing? An idea: independence. That idea is not my own original idea. The class did not have this idea first: The Founders did. Who in their right mind is afraid of Thomas Jefferson? Thats just it: This nation is off of its rocker as we have been denied the debate and a once open ended system is now a closed system or so we allege. Faced with contradictions or incongruences along with inconsistencies people are inserting anything and everything including, I am afraid of Susan as Im afraid of equality or Im afraid of Susan as Im afraid of the 2nd Amendment. I wrote, In case you do not get it not only has SCOTUS ruled against you but now we can own guns, guns and more guns even if we live next door to Congress. I also wrote, People control guns as guns do not have motive and intent nor can they act alone. Theres no such thing as gun control in actual reality as you control your own selves so no piece of paper like no gun will ever stop a crook from using a gun nor cause a crook to use one. Has a piece of paper ever stopped a lawyer? Things do not control people and people control their own selves not other people. People fabricate or manufacture guns and pieces of paper but they do not necessarily load, aim and shoot either of them. Next door to Congress would be The Whitehouse as Im in Neptune Beach, FL. These men could not distinguish what is rhetoric as in rhetorical. They actually told me that they had no rational basis. They asked me with these exact words, Do you understand that we have no rational basis? I said, Yes I do. Heres what I did not tell anybody until much later: I, Susan, already met and so know an injured Secret Service Agent. These men were never in any danger as in I was not baiting them into a Bivens action as I already identified the injury and as they control their own selves. I was measuring the parameters of the injury as in how far it has escalated and how it was now being realized. The class cannot fix a problem unless we correctly identify it and name the parameters. Furthermore I did not bait them: I knew my local town board, which I caught in the act of committing a crime, would react in order to then preserve their ability to injure us against our will. I could count upon them filing a false complaint to cover their tracks and to falsely blame me for their

own actions and their own motive and intent. I had Wal-Marts testimony and the testimony of a person who works in City Hall so I knew. These Secret Service Agents read the complaint: They too knew and they said it, Do you understand that we have no rational basis? An ideal outcome would be the Secret Service appearing for their sake and ours. I actualized the ideal outcome as they appeared on December 5th, 2008, the very day Roberts was supposedly conferencing this case when we believe he was not as we believe the docket is false as it CANNOT be the truth or its criminal on Roberts part. Again: We have no evidence that Roberts ever saw the case and/or saw a correct case summary. Next Door to Congress would also be SCOTUS. These agents could not or would not commit as to who the legal, constitutionally set President and Commander is: me, Roberts or Obama. They said Susan Herbert and John Roberts out loud while they only pointed to Obamas name but would not say it. Correct: A tie, exactly as I stated. That constitutes standing aside not down. Now:

376.

One of my favorite TV jokes is when Art Kearney grabs some pieces of paper Jackie Gleason has before him, eats them and says, There! I stole the punctuation so now youll never know what the note says! This joke strikes my constitutional fancy for every reason. I happen to hear an incredibly good TV hatchet job on Scalia. A Hollywood Legal Show wants me to believe Scalia is a suicidal-homicidal maniac and I think, That sounds so great it almost feels great. It was SCALIA GUNS SCALIA KILL GUNS GUNS GUNS SCALIA WRITING LAW GUNS! It looked great too. They had their resident mentally unstable law partner, a fictional lawyer in a fictional firm, dictate this FACT AND LAW BASED FICTION to the audience. Did I just hear THE HONEYMOONERS not two Secret Service Agents? Is this wedded bliss? Is the act of sex blind? Have they the federal government been watching too much TV? You decide:

In his gun control opinion Scalia, the actual person named Antonin Scalia, said, TAKE A DEEP BREATH KIDS AS THERES A COMMA IN THE SENTENCE.

He used other words as he wrote, PREFATORY CLAUSE. Correct, a comma. See? I just prefaced a comma with correct and I used an actual comma to do it. I used the word and the punctuation as they both symbolize the same thing. Antonin Scalia? He IS correct as there are only two versions of The Constitution in print with that comma in the 2nd Amendment or as it was originally written.

Neither of them are dated 1871. We complain:

The American Revolution turns not upon a dime but upon a comma.

The Plan To Vote

Barack Obama Jr. does not know the perceptual, experiential and contextual truth of the words St. Augustine once stated as fact but actual natural born

Americans do own this knowledge: Will is to grace as the horse is to the rider. Neither do at least 60 million voters.

Does this sound familiar? He has made judges dependent on his will alone for the tenure of their offices and the payment of their salaries; He has erected a multitude of new offices and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance; he has effected to render the military independent and superior to civil power; He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution and unacknowledged by our laws giving his assent to their pretended legislation? It should as its our Declaration and 1776 is happening nowOn our way into DC we will be entering a foreign nation and so we will declare ourselves: I am A People, of the constitutionally set government of the United States known as The People, thus I am an American and a Voter. Will we be leaving a foreign nation as we exit DC and re-enter America? Will we need to declare ourselves once more? That is one of the issues we will debate, reason, decide and then act upon or not as we plan to vote and we executed our plan:

When Adolph Hitler came to know he was nothing more than a dupe he became a full blown drug addict. He turned to heroin as heroin was discovered by a German and is a German word; Hitler turned to pharmaceuticals as he was always addicted to ego. Hitler could not liberate himself from the SS Elite, the group of men actually making decisions and running the Third Reich. They no longer needed Hitler to front them but Hitler was stuck as he had no value independent of the SS Elite. Once the class could definitively state that we were witnessing or experiencing authoritarians who are Moderns or actual Nazism in a different form than we could live a different ending.

I, Susan Herbert, volunteered; I deliberately acted and acted until I served Obama in actuality. In person. Once I heard Obama say Louisiana

Purchase, earthquake and Hawaii then I knew I had succeeded thus ONLY Barack Obama can answer a specific question. Obama Jr. is no longer dependent on the group who installed him nor the cronies in his employ. No person on Earth can answer this question but Obama so once he threatened me I effectively liberated him from the cabal. While Ray M. and I could work out the math and the physics on paper and so know this answer and give this answer to a judge ONLY Barack Obama can confirm it absolutely as he was there while we were not. We can use science to prove our answerer but only Obama can support it or not to a level of absolute proof. Thus Obama does not have to go down the same road that Hitler did and Obama is not dependent upon the cabal.

It matters not what this question is. It could be anything at all, even What did you eat for lunch that day? I meant and intended to give Barack Obama what Hitler never had, a way out as I can clearly show you how Obamas injury began before birth. It took a nation to raise Obama and then a world. One of my greatest accomplishments as a human being was learning to have compassion even for the Hitlers and Napoleons of this world although the reason I cried over Hitler is that I know you can snuff your energy out of this universe as if it never existed and never will again; another man cannot do it to you but you can do it to yourself. All that matters is Obama has the means to do what Hitler could not so hes no longer dependent upon the cabal. Do we need Obama or his testimony? No as his actions speak volumes and we have a record of it all and/or a living persons testimony but the injury never has to escalate as it did in Germany. By appearing and answering a single question then Obama is no longer following in Hitlers footsteps.

As I know Obamas actual facts and the nature of his injury then I inherited Obama whether I like it or not and I had the duty and obligation to give him a way out, which I did as soon as he threatened to kill me via violating Gideon. I, Susan, will know if he is telling the truth when he answers a single question as its the human psyche and simple science along with chain of command theory. I have had Americans screaming at me, literally screaming at me, as

I am not willing to judge Obama, Suter or Bickle and as in the end its Susan Clemons who is qualified to do this not myself as she is a former victimizer when I have no experience at all victimizing anyone and as for me it is personal with Clinton: I might not be able to distance myself emotionally from Clinton due to our facts. If I can, then can you overcome the seeming conflict? The conflict that appears to be so even if it is not?

I never want Americans to have mistaken beliefs due to an appearance only. Unlike Scalia I would have to recuse myself in the case of Clinton.

As I do not fall for fear conditioning or the tricks of any manipulator or predator I cant pass any personal judgment on Obama until or unless he looks me in the face and lies when answering this one question. Like any American if hes not natural born he can become it if he chooses to tell the truth in that moment and make his own case which is consequential only to him and his person. Call me a founding mother as its about the opportunity Obama was denied by his parents. A nation denied me any opportunity but my parents gave me all the tools I would need to defeat any enemy as an actual American knows the real enemy lurks within therefore the Revolution of the human heart will never end.

The class and I have discussed this; while we can press criminal charges in so many ways it is senseless as all of these people live inside prisons of their own design already. We proved to our own selves that we won our criminal case. In so many ways you cannot design a worse prison as this prison is of their own doing when they could make any choice in the world. As for a civil case? Some Americans will choose the high road and some will choose the low road; some will choose to lie, cheat and steal act ignorantly - while others will not; that is how it is as you cannot force anyone to The Constitution.

If there is anything that Susan Herbert and Susan Clemons understand it is the actual magnitude of the tragedy so unlike unjust men the class is not thirsty for revenge but only liberty and justice. This is not a suit against Obama but FOR America, for life, liberty and the pursuit of happyness. Hence The Proof Of Life Cases.

You want the class to hold you and so then for me to ultimately hold you because I hold you in trust being able to name the entry wound and exit wound thus you then get to speak for yourself. Imagine a clock with wholly innocent and wholly guilty at 12. By holding you every single degree of innocence and guilt that exists is open for you to plead. Your own testimony is your pleading and default means you choose whether to enter the renegotiated contract or not. We secured actual or legal default so we could aspire towards life aka liberty. Holding you or naming you or finding you gives you the MOST opportunity.

I wrote etc. etc. and then et al as not only is the versus in American law a fulcrum thus US law is not adversarial but I cannot name 6 billion Earthlings on one sheet of paper.

First SCOTUS clerks tried to tell me that little fairies met the mailman at the door and confiscated complaints directly and now the Washington, DC FEDERAL Court the word federal is a part of its official name - is telling us this same thing. There exists unique or nonexistent process in these courts. Thats not so hard to believe if the person telling me this is standing in DC and is working out of DC as DC is a nation unto itself literally. Its the word federal that seems incredible. Youre an expert as youre a voter and youre a federal court clerk and/or federal judge: Does your court employ fairies who meet paper litigants at the door and who point a magic wand at your head so you are then forced to surrender The People to Tinkerbells Administration? What, if you cant kill us let alone kill the truth or control the post office then youll position fairies inside every federal courthouse that

are paid with your tax dollars whose sole purpose in life is to defeat the LIBERTY FOREVER postage stamp? Thats not voting; thats what you have been doing since you left Eden.

You of all people should know:

America! As You Are The Greatest Fairy Story Ever Told.

Developments since I wrote the above in May: Barack Obama does not know the truth of what I did to him in Sioux City; that is, he has no idea that I was opening a door where once it was closed to him or that the class meant for him to threaten me. Barack Obama does not know that I gave him the answer to a question. Is Obama guilty of a crime in the case of Susan Herbert exactly? That depends upon his answer as only he knows it. To deny all of the named people the truth by violating the spirit of the law thus denying The People their right to enter the court is to then commit a crime as no person on Earth ever needs to violate the spirit of the law so whenever a human being does this it constitutes a crime. You should not be protecting anyone from the truth as that is the most lethal thing of all; to deny Obama the truth is to condemn him w/o a trial; it is a form of revenge as Obama cannot act until or unless you tell him the truth a truth his own closest friends and employees and family members now deny him. I instigated the recent release of what appears to be a phony certificate of live birth and that is yet missing the word transcript as the HA official that supposedly singed off on it did not use this word which means an exacting copy. As I continued to tell the whole truth Obama and the unjust persons around him became desperate and the reason or cause that then compels them to escalate this further is: The Federal Judiciary is refusing to do their job as are other federal authorities as now, they have no authority. Upon

Marbury the Judiciary only had moral authority if The People did as somebody has to test Marbury and so then A Summary View. Some of these unjust men are delusional and they truly believe this then means that their actions CANT possibly be illegal or else a federal judge would act. The complete failure to act is then a crime itself; it matters not why the Federal Judiciary failed; you might be afraid and you might be politicized and you might be a criminal nobody cares and it doesnt matter as you can act but will not. Your actions to deny The People any and all appearance in person then constitutes treason as now you are in violation of both the letter and spirit of US law and you know it. As we can reasonably assume that some of these people would not act as they are if you told them exactly why their actions are unjust and that some of their perceptions and personal beliefs are erroneous and why they are erroneous then all the Federal Judiciary is doing is: Convicting these people w/o any charges being filed or case being heard. The federal criminal charges that I filed and that I then successfully pressed stand for all time unless a hearing in person is held as until then nobody can act in their own defense so the possibility of overturning them does not exist. To deliberately deny The People access to a court they own and they maintain only to avoid your own actions from being reviewed is a sin. You cannot know what decision another human being will make until you tell them the truth and until they have an opportunity to act on their own volition. Federal court clerks and federal judges are attempting to dictate reality to everyone involved and all you are actually doing is harming your own selves first and then harming those named. You are acting as prosecutor, judge and jury, deciding issues you cannot decide as you are yet missing parts of the truth. That is it: Once we tell you the whole truth you may no longer deny it and that is why federal employees run so hard from the case they are running from the whole truth as if they can and may remain deliberately ignorant and these issues will somehow magically resolve themselves and so violent conflict will not occur. In actual reality all federal employees have been attempting to preserve is their ability to commit crimes w/o suffering the consequences when that is humanly impossible.

The truth will always be known as nature exerts it. When you reason another person is better than you, superior, then youve placed a value judgment on that person and yourself as you value yourself as less than or inferior. Most people assume placing value judgments is only harmful if you place an inferior value on another; no, as every value judgment you place on a person or a thing then is also a judgment you place on yourself. You may believe you do not place value judgments on people but you do as all fear that you experience that is not higher order instinct is a form a value judgment takes plus you wouldnt know your subconscious mind until or unless another person points it out or you confront your greatest fear via the Living Death. Until or unless you become aware of it your subconscious mind reveals itself no matter what you do to hide it or prevent it from surfacing; you cannot help but reveal it as its subconscious so you do not even know you are doing it while you do it. When I claim that in everything you do you are forever defining the truth of the truth or the truth of the lie youre telling? You will exactly define what is your subconscious mind by dancing all around it so that it lights up like a neon sign in Las Vegas; as you define it by not saying it or by acting to avoid it you may as well be shouting it at the top of your lungs as youre exactly stating ithumans like this universe are not selfdefeating by their very natures. Everything in this universe exists according to universal law. That is, we exist as the result of universal law at work but only humans can and do choose to abide by universal law or not; only humans can act in accordance with universal law or defy it. Theres always consequences then good and bad. If you defy universal law over and over? There will come a moment when you have finally offended The Creator and he will reciprocate as you will feel the incredible weight of your own guilt the exacting amount of injury and harm that you caused with full knowing, willing and deliberation. When you feel actual guilt not the skewed forms of guilt that you are used to that are associated with shame when you experience genuine guilt you know that you have committed treason. Humans run from this with all of their might as they fear the unknown and on some level understand that it is a form of death as once you do experience it the old you or the presented you dies and so the authentic you or core you no longer has the ability to place blame on another. As you aspired downwards it is an experience rooted in

the physical world but in actuality you have just met the godspark within you head on. No human should fear this as accepting the weight or bearing the burden is excruciatingly painful but it is the thing that liberates you as now you own the whole truth of your own self and your actions so you can make different choices than before. Susan Clemons can testify to this as it happened to her and she is the only person I know who went through it and came out the other side instead of running away. Most humans? They run without ever so much as making an attempt; they run from what they cannot know and in so doing harm themselves as once they shortchange themselves in this way they may have closed the door on this opportunity forever. If your circumstances in life lead you to be surrounded by sycophants or lawyers who want to get you off at any cost then this door might never open for you again as everyone in your world is telling you the comfortable lies that you want to hear. You came to be here on your own volition and so then you have to do this alone as its the exacting amount of injury and harm you not me or any other person caused. These issues are never, ever, ever going to go away and you WILL pay the price unless America falls permanently like Rome or unless the case is heard so that the debate ensues. In the former instance the issues will go away as the government has fallen and died; it is no more while in the latter you actively solve your problems. You are not harming us as I have been able to enforce US law and to win legal battles w/o ever setting foot in a US Federal Court and The People have been able to defy any and all orders emerging from DC and to Congress on their own. Unjust men have never been able to control us and they never will as thats universal law. US law which mimics universal law is built upon a proposition: YOU NEED NO INSTITUTIONS BUT ONLY CONSTITUTIONS. Harming another human being only as you have been harmed is never just. Be it Dick Cheney, Obama or Al Gore nobody on Earth has the right to deny them the truth and decide their destiny and fate when they remain uninformed as their true belief is The People do not know when we The People DO know. Ideally this case should have been automatically set for hearing in person before SCOTUS when it first entered but Dick Cheney and John Roberts do not control what the clerks do nor do they control if a male

clerk hates women and says so right out loud he said he truly believes women are less than men and that The People are less than his law license and then he acts upon those true beliefs. That clerk made that decision and acted upon it on his own. If one of the facts The People do know is that Obama is being lied to by every single person in his world including SCOTUS clerks? Then the Federal Judiciary acting upon the will and liberty of The People as all power and authority is derived from The People has a moral and ethical obligation to hold a hearing so Obama can become informed. If this does not apply to you the reader then I dont mean exactly you, do I? I, Susan, did not tell the Sioux City court several key pieces of information as I did not know that they did not have this information. You might believe the Sioux City Iowa federal ruling is a crime or is one of the worst federal rulings you have ever read but you cannot know this absolutely. My absolute proof that it is not a criminal act is Obama and the Sioux City clerks; my other absolute proof is the judge who issued the ruling as he exactly named ransom Earth with other words and what did he not know that I knew but did not tell him? I RANSOMED THE EARTH WHEN I PROVED A SUMMARY VIEW WITH MY OWN UNIQUE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BASED UPON JEFFERSONS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS HE NOT CALVERT WEIGHED THE EARTH. If you deny the case hearing in person when you know it went to SCOTUS directly and you hold the evidence rising to proof that SCOTUS clerks obstructed justice by interfering with the US mail to then interfere with delivery to Roberts? To prevent Roberts from knowing what they had done? Well then, you cannot tell me what you do not know so then I cannot address your concern. You are forcing me to guess or you are forcing me to author a complaint as I did, leveling the field between myself and the federal judge so whatever you do write to then avoid the whole truth will be you revealing your subconscious mind to me. Then I can act and I did. Strike the paper to then strike the People means: Strike the founding documents from the record to then strike our own existence as a nation from the record. If I said his own reasoning back to him then this judge would never write what he wrote as I have zero evidence that he is a homicidal maniac and once I clearly reason the case the point of law and bring it to a global level as I can argue the case through every

institution on Earth and then to a time before the Earth was formed? A federal judge would have no reason to write this plus: Did this judge understand that if one of your federal questions revolves around money then you may not ask for that money nor may you ORDER a person to fill out the forms IF that very action would cause the person to commit a crime? As I knew exactly what I was doing in Sioux City and as I knew the consequences exactly I could not fill out those forms if I wanted to do so as money alone is never a valid reason. You can then switch it out to state the FORM is what you are demanding but as action is the proof then that would cause me to lose the case automatically as my action would then be the absolute proof that I had no moral authority thus I was willing to pay tribute and to bribe a judge when I am not willing nor is the class. As I owned the knowledge that these judges did not know something but were keeping it from me and that they might be keeping it from me deliberately then I could not fill out that form until they told me exactly what they did not know. Now, can a judge act with deliberation to withhold information that he does not have in his head as he never ever knew it and I did not tell him? Obviously the answer is no therefore your reasoning, if you reason this ruling is criminal and/or stupid, is not good reasoning. It holds no water. As for Washington, DC: You must account for the fact that the clerks and judges who handled (it seems as if the complaint was handled and then returned) are physically in DC. Depending upon their subconscious mind, their sense of self and their unique lives it is possible that sitting in the geophysical location known as DC created or constituted a layer of insulation that then made something invisible to them; they might be in denial, they might be crooks or they might have had their subconscious dinged in such a way that they could not know something unless I told them out loud. When you account for every label a person wears or is you are looking at layers of insulation you have to dissolve or else some things will remain invisible to that person as once they acknowledge them then its no longer subconscious but conscious and its no longer actual denial. A person in denial cannot admit it or else they arent in denial. Denial is not merely claiming that you did not do something when you did; its deep its almost ingrained so a person in denial has to be brought out of it. If I shattered the illusion in such a way that I brought a clerk or a judge out of denial? They would react out of

fear unless they were with me in person or in a clinical setting so their denial could be addressed. If you are alone or you are with people who are lying to you and you are brought out of actual denial you will feel fear and your natural inclination is to retreat and unfortunately those around you will help you do thatonce a person is no longer in denial you must not let them attempt to stuff the truth back into their subconscious mind as they cant nobody can. All you can do is re-enter denial to then block it as its in your conscious mind as humans do not enter denial for what is subconscious. Its neuroscience; the other response humans have when brought out of denial and so feeling afraid? Violence, so until or unless I have more information I cannot state what did or did not happen in the DC Courthouse. So you have a point of reference: I accidentally said 4 or 5 exact words to a person naming the cycle of violence they were perpetrating against me that then brought them out of denial. In midsentence, as these words hit that persons language centers, he stopped and began talking about: Oranges and China. Immediately he recovered by claiming someone was calling him when they were not. We were on the phone. Oranges and China were ideas wholly unrelated to our conversation that sounded mentally ill; if any other human heard this they would make that assumption. I knew: I accidentally brought him out of denial. This person was absolutely stunned, became extremely afraid and immediately made an attempt to re-enter denial and I let him as I was warned that he might become violent if I ever did this. How do I know I hit upon the exacting truth of his person? Not only was he stunned but he said oranges and China two words totally unrelated to our conversation but totally related to me; he could not prevent his subconscious mind from being revealed as the whole truth of my person went up against the whole truth of his person once I said it out loud: Blame, shame, guilt and anger. Thats the emotionally violent cycle he engages with me that then becomes physically violent. Yes its orange as in Florida but its also orange as thats what one side in Irelands endless religious wars calls itself: Orange. Reduce the whole truth to two words and you would have exactly orange and China. If you have inflicted untold injury and harm on others by blindly supporting the 1871 Trust and blindly believing everything dictated to you in law school

and we come along and shatter that illusion so youre confronted with the lie you have been living out as real when it is not actual reality thus your entire existence is then questioned as are all of your beliefs, especially those you hold as true and/or as if law, you might be driven to prove that you are superior so you are right you might be driven to prove your own real and your own personal beliefs whether they are true or not - thus you take all manner of seemingly criminal and irrational actiona person in denial knows what they are doing; it is not mental illness that prevents you from knowing as you had to know to then begin denying it but once you account for every layer of insulation separating that person from the truth Washington DC is one that could reason certain actions for as long as Washington DC is real as if law in your head then you cant see past it. Its like Jeff Atkins and Clayton Higgins not being able to see past their law license at first. Once they became a victim that law license fell away so they could see past it. Because we are arguing constitutional law, natural birth, equality and the DC Trust something like a law license, a title like judge or being in DC can be an extra thick layer of insulation that not only prevents you from seeing beyond it so that you cannot stand upon Art. III with us but prevents you from seeing us as we are in actual reality as we are disguised as Justices. Youre looking for a defect and for a lawyer when were Justices. Note: not all gang mentality is clinical denial; when everyone in prison denies reality and claims they are innocent? They do not mean wholly innocent under the law! This is not clinical denial as these people mean they cannot reason how they came to be in jail as they cannot connect themselves to the crime or the charge; they mean they have an excuse such as they were abused as children or they were there but did not pull the trigger. They do not understand the application of the law or that words have different meanings in various disciplines and humans tend to assign meaning to words. They cannot reason their own actions within the chain of causation they truly believe that another person set them in motion - and they do not own the concept of age of reason as in Are you able to reason your actions as righteous or wrong aka criminal? You hear them say Im innocent and you yourself assign meaning to those words as if they are claiming they were not involved at all in any way with the crime. Its not clinical denial and not even denial as if you merely tell a prisoner that not guilty is not the same

thing as innocent then they have knowledge most Americans do not. If perspective is your problem then when you come up against the whole truth of US law a federal judge will be in the same boat with a federal prisoner as neither of you are wholly innocent while at least one of us is wholly innocent. So then your law license or your title is like original sin that you committed. Do you know how thin the line is between federal judge and federal prisoner? Do you see how when the Sioux City Iowa court clerks seemed to make a mistake and a big one I knew it was anything but a mistake and instead was a distress signal as they filed us under a prisoners motion so it could only be that they were being threatened with death as prison is a form of death and as what you now live in as you built it is a prison? Via life experience I know the very fine differences so that it might be a gang of Senators or it might be a gang of judges but all denial is not actual mental illness and does not result in a gang mentality; that gang mentality may have a different cause such as fear of the unknown so you have a silent contract you refuse to acknowledge. Sioux City acknowledged it and then asked for help. In Barack Obama Jr. exacting conditions were present as was an exact cycle and exact dynamic so that when the injury Dunham suffered from as it was nuclear and generational was compounded as much as possible w/o actually killing someone a predator was born. Dunham, a pathological liar created a sociopath and some sociopaths are made while some are born; those who are born are predatory. Its not law that a sociopath cant feel guilt only that they do not and its highly unlikely that they ever will as they have no conscience and this is directly related to being indoctrinated by atheists while still in the womb; atheists are taught tactics that can only be labeled psychological warfare as a part of their doctrine thus they indoctrinate others. Indoctrination is a part of their very doctrine. If conditions are perfect you will indoctrinate a person while still in the womb. If nobody then intervenes? This then becomes cemented inside a human being as they have no sense of self so that upon making their first moral decision around age 4 immorality and unethical then becomes their deluded sense of self and it then drives them. Its not possible for Obama to believe in The Creator so in Dunhams case she came to truly believe that she had defeated nature via her son. In Dunhams world if you pitied her then she felt love thus

secured your approval; if you did not object to her actions, never named the emotional lie she was telling or you pitied her she then truly believed that you were the same a liar or that you approved of her. In this way she inflicted her personal real on you as if it were actual reality of the US and this universe. As Dunhams parents never felt remorse for what they did to her and Dunham never felt actual love she then came to believe she was feeling love if you dumped pity on her. Every time you gave her a free pass or otherwise rewarded her? You were giving her incentive to abuse her child as she was driven to gain the approval of other authoritarians who have a Modern perspective and so exactly her father. Her refusal to ever commit to the truth in any way even if that meant changing one letter in her name is the means to deny you the ability to withhold your approval as Dunham could tell herself that SHE wasnt responsible; it wasnt her work so it wasnt her true belief (your criticism applies to the fictional character she signed as) or she violated law but only as you let her you then couldnt judge her and you were guilty not her. Unless you were me or Susan Clemons you would not know the emotional manipulation at work; you would not know Dunham was telling an emotional lie to then support the metaphysical lie she was telling and vice versa; you wouldnt know that the emotional truth she told you is a complete lie as her body language and the tone of her voice combined with her exact words and actions in no way matches actual reality. How would you know as fact what Dunham actually felt and thought when you dumped an emotion on her? I will give you an example that should hit home with federal judges, lawyers and men: You do not own the truth as wisdom that humility is not humiliation and in fact there is a gulf between the two. When the class levels the playing field you are supposed to feel humility not humiliation or shame; when you surrender to the fact that you will never defeat nature when you humble yourself before The Creator you should not feel or believe it makes you defective or less than as nature is. When some human beings tell you that they cant kneel in prayer, that they cant tell the truth or that they cant admit that they do not possess a skill or a piece of knowledge? They actually mean that they do not have the ability to do so as the true belief they hold in their minds is like a law of this universe; its law to them that if they ever do these things then they are humiliated and feel humiliation thus

their overblown ego prevents them from having the ability. It sounds mentally ill and it is but an authoritarian who is a Modern will lie about small things and large things and then plot and plan to keep lying in order to avoid ever having to producethey do not care how insane their lies begin to sound or how insane their actions seem to be; they are convinced that they can trick you into believing them or that they can drive you into mental illness. A Modern will escalate the smallest lies to death as their logic is they will never be made to produce so in reality its about non-existent ability and capacity. A tactic you are experiencing currently with Obama? Authoritarians must shake your faith thus get you to doubt yourself and your sanity in order for their manipulation to work on a mass scale. They mean and intend to delude the masses so they produce propaganda and re-write history but first they must get you to lend your belief to them as if something is possible hence you never heard of Clinton or Obama before they were forced upon you by being placed upon the ballot; as you never heard of them it might be possible for them to possess ability and capacity. Once you believe its possible you have cast doubt upon your own good sense so then you are given contradiction after contradiction as humans will insert anything upon being faced with a contradiction they cannot reason as possible or legal. Whatever they insert spreads like a cancer and infects the population aka the masses. When everything is a contradiction you feel crazy thus experience false fear so you react you believe what the deluded masses believe as that feels safe when it is not as you have now given up your will to the group. Moderns count upon the deluded masses enforcing their lies as if anyone dissents the masses accuse them of being crazy or of lying; a mob mentality forms and dissent is effectively silenced as the fear escalates until you fear death if you dissent. People who would dissent and people who would resist enter denial as the actual reality of the situation is horrifying so that they cannot exist unless they deny reality thereby becoming numb to it. A wholly false sense of safety in numbers is realized. Germans who were ethical but who were faced with extreme fear that they could not handle or who truly believed they were powerless but who could never condone what the Nazis were doing were forced to ignore and deny reality as if the holocaust wasnt happening; accounts of whole villages turning a blind eye

to what the Nazis were doing are actually accounts of groups of people made emotionally numb as the condition is your life so love is absolutely conditional and then you CAN divest yourself from the victims never realizing YOU are a victim, the ultimate victim. As every purported fact of Obama is a contradiction then you were subjected to thisyou truly believe what is not possible, you truly believe the condition is black (youre a racist if you dissent) or you read our complaints and deny the law exists or that actual history that did transpire did not transpire. The politicization Roberts named is the gang mentality turning into a mob mentality as you passively participated with the group but that is turning into active participation as crimes are being committed in plain sight but yet you fail to act. Is there a reasonable, rational basis to your fear? The class knows universal law the criminals do not thus they cannot carry out their threats as it only seems as if. Universal law at work dictates that we will always and forever have an edge as we are able and capable in ways they are not and we possess actual power and authority; if you reduce this to a numbers game their mob is about 500, 000 strong while our constitutional gang or army is billions strong; MLK? He was shot and killed as he stood alone and he was never able to conquer the incredible fear realized in his world while members of the class were able to do so we possess capability he did not. JFK? JFK was unethical and immoral; when people tell you that he had a death wish believe them as he did. Conditions now, today, are different and we know secrets about this universe never before known to people so we can defend ourselves like never before. Do you know how easy it is actually is to dissolve these unjust men? All you need to do is tell them the truth, that you know the truth as fact without question, to their faces. Disguise yourself as justice and you can walk right up on one and crumple him like an empty sack of flour by hitting him behind his knee. You can do it in person or on paper. An authoritarian who is a Modern will not recognize you and will not be able to defend himself as he has zero experience of justice. Actual justice becomes a cloak of invisibility. Moderns possess no self-awareness thus they are not aware of their surroundings so its too late for them by the time they realize it as you already nailed them. See the attachment regarding the pathology of the disease, Oprah Winfrey Acting

While Under The Influence. In person Americans experienced the actual reality of the Nazis and thought Europeans themselves had to be nuts to ever believe these guys were formidable, tough and invincible thus be afraid as there wasnt anything to fear. What might a federal judge know but not own? You do not own the knowledge as wisdom that you already own the truth as you are that truth. Youve never been an authority case of o.j., youve never been in compliance with the EP&DP clauses and/or youve never actively but only passively used learning that is genetically encoded in humans. You never tested yourself so you never had that experience of life thus you know it intellectually but not as wisdom. I added this as #4 but Ill go here again as you might not own the application, the facts or the actual reasoning: A very important date is looming in the near future, August 2nd, 2011. The Whitehouse, whoever that is, now claims the date is July 22nd. The Americans are going to default on the $14 trillion dollar debt on this date. It will be the SECOND time the US has defaulted not the first time as the US First officially defaulted on 11/05/08. Did it ever occur to you, a judge, that Susan Herbert colluded and conspired with the Office of the Solicitor General to then force default to occur? What if Susan Herbert wrote to the Office clearly reasoning why only default was the answer only default would be legal as I asked the unanswerable federal question so that any and all responses other than default would be criminal due to the existence of a waiver when that waiver itself is a legal impossibility? Ask yourself: If you are a paid Officer acting under the 1871 version of The Constitution does the Solicitor General have the right to waive your rights if the Chief Clerk of SCOTUS has already threatened to violate your rights criminally by denying you informed consent and so all of your other rights and he says that he has a way to then keep you in the dark for all time as he controls the docket and the other court clerks? If you had no opportunity to object and you truly believed direct entry was not possible, may the Solicitor then waive your rights or is it unlawful as YOU then were denied a hearing in person in any court? I made an attempt to reason the point of law regarding the Judiciary never being set so now the Judiciary must be of the ability to set themselves but I was never going to be able to reason everything they

needed to know as the gap in knowledge was so great and events were continuing to transpire so that conditions changed. Do you see how by denying us a hearing in person what you are actually doing is denying yourself a hearing? So then, once I secured that first default I then contacted North Korea, China, the Hague and a few other nations or world courts. I told them my plans and that I had won the day. Our $14 trillion dollar debt that was mostly held by China then? That debt is effectively erased as soon as I set foot inside a federal courthouse thus our debt returns to zero as no nation can ever pay me what they owe me and then all Americans. Chinas bill would be a bill for Korea, Vietnam and Iraq with interest plus damages. Frances bill? Unpaid WWI & WWII loans with interest. Id levy damages but France does a great job damaging it own self and cruel and unusual punishment is not legal. Arguing the case across the Earth as no other nation has an elegant form of government I then calculated that no nation on Earth could ever pay us as that much money does not exist in reality but even if it did it is worthless. The only thing these nations have that ever covers the debts they owe us and that is actually valuable? THEIR PEOPLE! I, Susan, successfully pressed a case that then makes me the owner of every human on Earth. Now, youre my hostages i.e. slaves. I claimed title to the universe and won it. The reason the US is about to default on these loans thus then be owned by whomever carries the majority of this debt on August 2nd, 2011 is the IMF, created by the Brettonwoods Agreement. FDR ceded the US Treasury to the IMF but as the US Treasury is The People he could not possibly cede us to the IMF. FDR told himself and others involved that the US Treasury was Fort Knox or was Incorporated DC when that is not possible as gold and paper money does not act on its own and so has no power and authority it can lend to itself or to the paid Officers. Money empowers nothing and no person under US law. The existence of the IMF was contingent upon the US being a member and its main supporter. Then other nations would also join but the problem with all of this is the IMF was created - designed to be a pyramid scheme. It was never not going to collapse so when you combine that with the fact that FDR had no legal power to cede The People or award our

custody to the rest of Earth to everyone and everything but our own selves then you have no rational basis for the IMF. When other nations agreed to participate they did so based upon the fact that they truly believed all of this was humanly possible and was legal; they were counting upon America to then support them and their nonsense when the energy needed to support this scam is nonexistent. As I know FDR, I know bad math is a pattern and I know crooks then I, Susan, knew to look up the dates of the IMF and the UN as to ceded the US Treasury to the IMF the UN would first have to exist as a legal entity and the UN cannot exist as a legal entity unless FDR first agrees to act to do what is a crime as the UN is dependent upon the IMF first existing. You might recognize Kurt Godels Theory of Incompleteness at work here: For the IMF to exist the UN has to exist as a legal entity we have a legal Treaty with but for that to happen first the IMF must exist; if the IMF exists first then FDR has agreed to do what is a crimeFDR has agreed to cede our custody to the IMF thus the UN before we have a legal Treaty with the UN as that entity, The UN, will not exist until he does so. Once the UN exists as FDR has created the IMF with no power and authority to do so and when its not possible as the UN does not yet exist as we have never legally acknowledged it THEN he can enter a Treaty with it! Is your head aching yet? If FDR presents his twisted logic to the Congress NOBODY on Earth is going to go along with this. I knew as absolute fact FDR had to circumvent Congress and/or create the IMF and then file the Treaty. That is the only way around his problem was to publicly enter a Treaty but not file it as the Treaty is only good upon filing. Filing is what counts as you cant consent or object until its a matter of public record. If FDR wants to avoid a criminal prosecution and wants to avoid the wrath of Congress as well as deny you the right, all he has to do is withhold filing and then he can tell himself the lie that it is our fault as we should have known when in reality no person had access to these records and no person understood as wisdom that The People are the government not DC and not paid Officers. So I looked and sure enough FDR first ceded our custody to the IMF thereby creating it and then he filed the Treaty a few months afterwards thus no Treaty existed when he created the IMF via ceding the US Treasury to it.

While the UN may have been a physical building standing in NY it was not a legal entity and it was not recognized by the US. The IMF/UN never owned us and no debt then was ever incurred, as its not possible. You are not actualizing law. All you have been doing is realizing the lies you tell; its made real as you manifest what you truly believe; you manifested injustice but injustice is not universal law, is it? You created and your creation is the product of lies but precisely as it is not born of law then it is not actual reality. But lets pretend it is as you may not understand what is real is not always actual reality or that were a nation of law as the universe is of law the caveat being you can defy nature as thats what sapience allows you to do; you exist according to universal law but then you choose to act or to behave in accordance with nature or against nature, as The Creator does not force you to act: If you ask other nations who or what the government is? They might say The People but most do not and of those who do say The People? They have no grasp of what that then means. When other nations entered the IMF/UN, did they know that not only did FDR violate US law in an impossible way but that eventually every nation not only the US would have to default as these amounts of energy do not exist in this universe and that all nations are doing is assigning arbitrary value to paper money thus then assigning an arbitrary value to the people so that the IMF would become the prison from which they could not escape? Did they fully understand that governments would be forced to print worthless currency to maintain a false appearance and that as it was designed to be a pyramid scheme it had to collapse? Did they know that you cannot possibly pin all your hopes upon Americans as your standard if you then seek to control the American people by buying worthless debt that you know is worthless? The answer is no as when I reason the point of law they then understand the logic dictates that the IMF/UN cannot be good at all in any way as it is not possible. UNIVERSAL LAW DICTATES THIS! Other nations did not know as in they knew but did not own the knowledge US law and US case law is not their native language; they have no life experience - and so the reason the collapse of the US dollar is so vitally important is that every other nation in the world came to rely upon the IMF thus the Americans. Other nations do

not own the knowledge as to why we are so able and capable while they are not. The exactly named class does own this knowledge. We exactly defined what other men could not define. To solve our own economic crisis is then to solve a worldwide economic crisis. What you need is a currency with a universal standard and then the means to institute it which I created by going through SCOTUS as the Sophists calling themselves Nobel Prize Winning Economists do not want you to know that they have solutions only for the effects so their answers are like putting a Band-Aid on a nicked artery. These economists have a skeleton in their closest: All of their answers REQUIRE that a government assign an arbitrary value to humans so they REQUIRE that you hate women and people with skin color that is other than white. Our plan? When I contacted China and North Korea they knew I made the case. Suddenly the bulk of US debt was then taken on by Japan. I then told them Nice try, but no cigar as Japan owes me for Pearl Harbor as the reasons we fought both world wars ARE NOT American causesat some point we were going to have to intervene as only the Americans had the ability to defeat Hitler as we do not fall for the illusion (or we did not then) so Pearl Harbor never had to happen. Once it did? Then we had another problem: When the Japanese knew they had lost the war they announced they would fight until the last Japanese person was standing or take it to a new level of escalation, complete annihilation, thus we were FORCED to bomb Japan. Japan said: We will kill ourselves and you without any actual reasoning or any actual cause other than we can so we will. Thats inorganic insanity. Japan might be under the delusion that it rebuilt itself or that it is successful economically because of something they themselves did but that is not the truth. There is a difference in the way Japanese and the US patents work and the reason that difference exists is due to an American as the business model Japan adopted is an American invention thus any economic success Japan has had is completely due to America. An American who understood that he would never be able to test his intellectual property here in his lifetime volunteered to go to Japan and rebuild it after the war so that he could test his property there. He taught the Japanese their business model. If we never bomb Japan and we never rebuild

Japan then Japan never rises again. Since WWII we have been competing against our own selves economically not the Japanese as their model is the property of an American! Because I own this knowledge then Japan can and may buy up worthless US debt but I can yet argue it out of existence. Japan owes me and Japan cannot pay unless it pays in the form of every one of its citizens. The reason I contacted China? If I caused China to react as I predicted then my theory is proven as I am successfully proving the correct behavior of nature that no other human being knows. So the US debt is erased; in return I argue the IMF out of existence thus every nation is liberated from it as no nation can succeed if they are still imprisoned by it so that every nation has zero debt. The reason we can all go to zero debt is: I possess the universal mean that can, will and does float a universal currency. If youve been following Icelands and Greeces insolvency you know that that the people are broken and rioting in the streets; it is said that Greece owes three times its energy. Greece cannot produce that energy any more than Congress can as thats the law of conservation of matter and energy: Theres a set amount of energy in this universe and that energy changes form so energy is not being created nor destroyed. Greece belongs to the European Union, the modern day Romanesque empire. The latest Nobel worthy opinion I have heard is that the euro dollar is killing Greece. They are comparing Greece to England and claiming that while the euro works for England it doesnt work for Greece. How is that possible if they all joined a union? Its only possible if your monetary system enforces a class system and a denial of liberty. The person proffering this opinion kept referring to the euro dollar as currency when it is not claiming that its Greeces currency thats the culprit. And then he told the truth: He said that the brilliant idea they had was to create another bank another bank! and so there would be two banks in Europe that somehow supported the Union, with one bank being for poor nations like Greece and Spain and the other bank being for wealthy nations like England and France. Who among you goes to the poor bank when they set out to borrow or deposit money? What, nations that are labeled poor due to some overblown sense of entitlement France has would be barred from the wealthy bank? How is it that if youre born Greek and/or in Greece you are automatically poor? The IMF tried this; did it help any third

world nation? Do you need a poor bank or is it that the euro dollar is at fault as are all dollars as they aid and abet your denial of reality, your sense of superiority that is w/o reason? I have an actual idea that is not Nobel worthy as its not elitist: Shelve your fatally flawed ideas as millions of humans have tried them and they do not work and never will; shelve the fiat debt money system, banks and credit as you now know them and all forms of money that do not rest upon a universal standard as without a universal standard all youll experience is generational, endemic poverty, or, the same old result over again. Something has to give so what you need to do is change it up to then secure different results not be a passive victim of circumstance: On August 2nd, 2011 all outstanding US debt is called in; I answer by informing the planet of my good math: Dear Earth, The answer is: Nope, as we did not default as only DC defaulted thus on 11/05/08 all US debt became actually worthless and even carried a negative balance but yet you bought it. As you acted upon the belief that DC was and is the government when that Trust was not legal and never will be as it itself exists in open and direct violation of the Constitution due to the DC Organic Act that accords DC a vote in Congress, a vote that our Constitution does not allow for and that our Founders did not allow for as DC is not the constitutionally set government and that is what this vote is meant to install, an institution as the government, then you incurred the loss; you not me are liable. The DC Organic Act is dated 1871 and my absolute proof that on some level all of these nations had to know this was not legal and never would be? Lloyds of London, a syndicate still in operation, as upon these actions Llloyds then issued the worlds first reinsurance policy, a policy meant to re-insure businesses operating in America as once the unlawful Trust was then these businesses had no insurance against losses, did they? Lloyds issued its first re-insurance policy against America in: 1871. Thus on some level other nations had to know but yet participate. DC

defaulted and every other nation defaulted but not The People; The People did not default! By my calculations you still owe me as I won all 6 billion of you and then I liberated you from the IMF so that you yet owe me. Upon the US debt dropping to zero and upon the dissolution of the IMF thus your debt drops to zero, we institute a universal currency and so the only repayment you can ever make to us? The only award you have in your possession that you can grant to us? EVERY PERSON ON EARTH MUST ACT TO LIBERATE THEMSELVES AS INDIVIDUALS AND AS WHOLE NATIONS; THEY MUST FORGE THEIR OWN INDEPENDENCE BY DECLARING THEMSELVES AND INSTITUTING JUST GOVERNMENTS THAT ARE ACTUALLY CONSTITUTIONAL AND ARE ELEGANT. OR ELSE: I OWN YOU LEGALLY! I cannot give you liberation; liberty, by its very nature, is something that you must act to secure for yourselves. Your governments cannot buy you back asI OWN YOUR LEADERS AS WELL! Theres nobody you can pay but me and I do not buy and sell human beings. I might come to own them as a court award your custody is now mine - but I cannot sell you what is not mine to sell as you are born into liberty by your very nature as sapient creatures. You can adopt our form or you can devise your own form based upon the elegant forms you find in America; you can avoid all of our mistakes and you have something we did not: you have the absolute proof that these elegant forms work in actual reality so that one lone vote can, does and will move an entire planet as I set the example for you. If I can do it then you can and as I know every nations distinct identity as I demonstrated in my world suit then you have no excuse as its possible and you will not become a copy of America. Your friend, Petition 07-9804, 08-6622 & 09-677 as 3 times is the charm. What will follow is every nation on Earth then is only as valuable as its citizens willingness to abide by universal law. This means each lone person decides his or her own worth so that it is no longer dependent upon outside things and arbitrary, transient values. If you have value and you own this

knowledge than your currency does as we have a common understanding, people who value themselves so highly do not accept victimization and they do not go to these cheap places humans have been going to as it is no longer acceptable as it never works. For the very first time ever third world nations will have the power and authority to pull themselves out of poverty, famine and pestilence as now the playing field is leveled between America and their person. Once you begin abiding by universal law then everyone is equally as valuable. You retain your uniqueness as a person as all humans are unique but all humans have the same potential in that we all have a gift to contribute. The universal mean that supports your currency? Its the numerical value of the godspark; its the numerical value of your conscience or your motive and intent. As every human was imbued with sapience it is the same for all of us so that the difference becomes whatever you decide to make of yourself. Thus you are actually independent as no other human can stop you from achieving; no other human has the ability or capacity to prevent your truth and the truth from being revealed as that is a matter of what is universal law not what we make up in our fantasies. Other nations will no longer need US aid as they will now have the ability and capacity to help themselves and they will no longer tolerate the likes of the Obamas of this world or the other penny ante dictators of this world as they will own the knowledge that by acting to harm others or by acting to turn a blind eye to corruption they only harm themselves directly. When human beings have tangible evidence and proof that they ARE valuable and when they have the ability to effect change directly when they can vote and that vote has an immediate effect then humans exert their best attempt each time and they never accept less than your best attempt. Harming yourself directly is not necessary as you can help yourself directly. Recently NY Magazine reported that Obama asked 5 or 6 Nobel Prize Winning Economists to come to the Whitehouse; they did. The cover read something like Hows that hopey-changy thing working for ya? Obama asked them to tell him what to do. No President legal or not should be asking other people what to do. Asking for advice is one thing but asking to be told what to do is

another. Its not up to these economists. Barack Obama asked 5 or 6 Nobel winners what to do and yet he is sitting back and doing nothing when he knows August 2nd will be here and soon? Unjust men are not willing to face up to what they have done as all of them knew August 2nd was coming; while they could not know default would occur in their lifetimes until 11/05/08 they have had all of that time since then and they have done nothing but make everything worse. Every expert I collected testimony from said that releasing some of our oil reserve as Obama announced he would do is in violation of that mandates original intent or the reserve was not created for this purpose as no severe supply problem exists and that this could very well be our ruination as its at best a 3 or 4 month fix and you can never use these reserves to solve the problem long term; no oil reserve? China owns you as that reserve is meant to be leverage against the threat of an oil embargo. Once again Obamas exact words are a lie as nothing that happened in Libya or anywhere in the middle east has caused a severe shortage as defined by this mandate; there is no actual severe shortage of or in our oil supply; what Obama is short on is cash. The flawed thinking is if gas prices drop then that cash is then freed up when in reality it isnt as gas is so heavily taxed plus all of that money eventually finds its way into the IMF. All you do is place us in a worse position than before you touched the reserve as currently you are dependent upon oil. If the US enters financial default on August 2nd, 2011? A violent conflict will occur that will then turn into a world war as all any nation needs to invade the US is for the US to default on its loans and then enter a civil war waged by The People against the paid Officers. They, both The People and an invading foreign nation, will possess cause as we did not pay up, did we? Once you are already engaged in a violent conflict then you CANNOT enter a legal claim nor can you avoid death. As you are not abiding by the letter or the spirit of US law then you will have no moral authority and universal law will not be on your side. Default is the door China needs us to open but unjust men keep lying to themselves and so keep claiming that theres something they can do to save the IMF and Federal Reserve as we know it as a private not public corporation. This is not possible as the IMF

has to crash as it was designed to do thus the difference between default or not defaulting then is the difference between global liberation or not as without the Americans then already injured people are so incapacitated that they cannot thwart or defeat a physical invasion. The lie unjust men told themselves? That China would never make a play for global dominance when all China has ever said is it is working to destroy America so it can then take control of Earth. China has announced over and over that it will take advantage of an opportunity to invade. Dont believe me? Not only is China actively controlling supply and demand of oil thus manipulating oil prices but now they are manipulating the supply of rare earths which we use in almost all modern electronics. China undercut the market until every mine in the US closed; mines all over the Earth could not compete with the prices China charged. Once these mines closed? China announced that it will not sell its supply as China will use it. Guess what we use rare earths in? MILITARY EQUIPMENT. A mine in the US then reopened to address the shortage but it cannot produce enough of these minerals to meet our need. To force financial default China not only bought US debt but then exerted undue influence over the global markets and the US via the UN. What, nobody noticed that every major US manufacturer and retailer moved to China? That US citizens who owned these businesses began to negotiate private treaties with China thus they violated US law only to make more money but then have no long term future? You do not maintain a million man army for no reason. North Korea then began manipulating the US via taking hostages. Theyre testing us. US law is: YOU NEVER NEGOTIATE AS WHAT YOU NEVER NEGOTIATE IS OUR SAFETY; YOU NEVER, EVER VIOLATE US LAW TO GAIN THE APPROVAL OF AN UNJUST, INELEGANT GOVERNMENT. Barack Obama? He openly and directly violated US law when he claimed to be the lawfully set President and Commander but negotiated our safety when he acted to sign or to join the Copenhagen Accord as this accord demands that you cede your sovereignty. Sovereignty Obama never had as he is not a natural born American and he does not own us regardless so now you have a not legal President who is a foreigner according to every definition under US law and case law who may never have voted legally as he may not have ever

possessed that right but took it for himself regardless and who somehow holds a Connecticut social security number when he worked in Hawaii as a teenager so should have held a Hawaiian social security number to then first go to work acting to award our sovereignty to: The Copenhagen Model, a model that objectifies people and personifies things. You might want to take another peek at Godels work, as you might come to understand the beauty and the absurdity of it all. In this case it was exactly named COPENHAGEN. No matter what form the Copenhagen Model takes it will always be wrong; be it a federal judge, a voter, a treaty, a scientific argument, an accord, a person or a book, this theory will always be wrong and will never even be so much as good theory as who can observe this universe and who can experience this world but yet theorize that the animate arises from the inanimate? They would be the same clowns who are running around Washington DC in a panic as the US will default unless we appear and so whatever they do on Earth they cannot let the citizens know that they could not pay but yet they told The People who could make good on this debt to never, ever tell the truth in federal court again as what they cant have you knowing is that they are so incompetent that they are absolutely unsafe. They are as unsafe as any foreign invader. Before they ever admit defeat they will kill you in a war waged against China when only Ray and I can win such a war as we always knew the key to defeating communism was to out think the enemy. If your starting position is we do not need oil or rare earths as we have something better than nuclear energy that will make for the biggest scientific advancements ever then you have won the war before you ever fire a single shot. A bloody conflict is totally unnecessary; the rest of Earth not encompassed by Washington DC? If they did not want us to liberate them from the IMF they would have objected or they would have acted against us but they did not. I gave everyone plenty of time to act. I gave them advanced warning and I did so three times. Periodically I would contact them, between filings. Earth has my phone number and my address. How easy would it be to stop us if they could? If they wanted to stop us? This easy as I purposely made it easy for them: Give me a passport and a one way ticket. Not one nation once

objected in any way. Did you ever stop to reason that maybe, just maybe, as I offered these people something they never had before, actual hope, that this spurred the recent revolutions you are witnessing across Europe and the Middle East? If I can run Obama all over the US and run China all over the planet then moving other nations is not so hard for me as all I need do is give them an idea, the actual means to a just ending. The US going broke due to a federal budget crisis is not the same thing as defaulting on loans. When we go broke we have failed to fund our government, we cannot make up for a shortfall or no budget has yet been signed into law. Eventually federal employees are paid and resources are provided. When we go broke we do not foreclose on ourselves. Defaulting on loans is bankruptcy so then the bank, the IMF, can and will foreclose on you. But not if Susan Herbert defied a Federal Appellate judge and so placed all of this within her Motion To Reconsider Your Own Destiny And Fate as she knew as long as she got it on the record and it remained on the record then it stands. If this court contacts Andrea within the 11th District Appellate she will be able to produce the documents although the ruling ORDERS her to remove them from the files and mail them back to me. What sane person would pull files from a federal courthouse and mail them back to the litigant as if they never existed? An unsuspecting person. I told Andrea to be forewarned, that as this judge was already in the process of committing a crime as she signs her name Frank when she knew this case is about the false appearance of the paper so that every reader believed she was a man and this was no accident as it was meant to ping your subconscious mind to then make or force you to believe a lie thus your reality is changed then we could depend upon her nature so she would, as absolute fact, order Andrea to remove the files only this order would itself be in violation of the law as that was her only option plus thats the pattern or the pathology of the disease. If liberty and justice was possible then I never would have entered SCOTUS directly. As I did then we know as absolute fact that liberty and justice must have been made impossible from a time before I entered the 11th District. I named a crime committed by the Governor of FL that then served to be supporting proof as if a governor who is in the 11 th District has committed at

least one crime by my count (two acts but one charge) that a lawyer then independently confirmed had indeed happened then the Federal Judiciary had to have fallen upon a district wide level as both of these acts were in conjunction with: Federal Court Appeals concerning women. Therefore justice for women and children was never possible in the 11th District. A Federal Appellate judge never needed to violate the law in letter or spirit as the Governor of FL did it for her already as at least one of these cases was then heard in SCOTUS and women lost their lives and unjustly so thus all the Federal Appellate ever had to do is: Hear the case in person. If you believe you can deny your actions by striking the documents removing them from the files you cant as even if you remove the paper then how do you kill the court clerk so they never testify that they read and filed the documents? If you use fear conditioning to force your clerks to lie then how do you kill the mailman so he never testifies that he delivered the documents? Okay then: HOW DO YOU KILL 300 MILLION PEOPLE TO STOP THEM FROM TESTIFYING? A physical war with China is one way! Once a sitting President commits a crime and it is ruled that he alone is above the law so that he is not guilty when he is guilty then no federal judge needs to commit a crime as Bill Clinton did it for you already. No matter how tempted you are do not waste your energy as its actually futile. Obama should have known his actions are futile. It is as several Americans have said: These people make Watergate look like childs play, or, its not about being caught as we already caught you. US V Nixon? Caught you! In Re Susan Herbert? And how! Feeling sorry for any of these people paid and unpaid officers makes

everything worse as these people arent sorry; they arent remorseful and they do not feel guilty; in some cases the ability to feel guilt is not theirs. They will keep killing Americans including those they consider as being of their own kind until they no longer receive any reward for actions that are selfish, greedy and cruel. When they no longer receive whatever they have labeled a benefit then they no longer have motivation to continue. If I told you how cheap these people are you would be hard pressed to believe it; in one case a federal employee decided to harm every single American in order to get a rise out of me over 15 cents! 15 cents! That was her exactly named

price. She attempted to rob me of my human dignity. Of Course I turned the tables on her so she felt humiliated and ever since she has not so much as come near me; if I am in her federal building? She avoids me as theres no benefit to be had as I dont feel sorry for her and so anything she dumps on me will the boomerang back on her, directly. You may not have a price as the class does not but you would not know what someone elses price is and if youre paying it unawares as you have no experience of people telling you the whole truth in a courtroom and you yourself have never declared that you have no price in such a way its non-negotiable but we have as its on the record in several different places and we were able to name it to the faces of federal authorities: We have no price; we want nothing but John Roberts and the truth. Justice. Therefore Obama mistakenly believed there was benefit to be had in attacking Roberts thereby attacking justice when thats insane and would only lead to Obama confessing publicly. It did. Did you know that his price is the trappings of power and your false, illegitimate and wholly conditional love in that he wants and needs your unconditional pride? Did you know the price you are paying is your own will and liberty as now your will is the will of the group not your own? Now that you do know why are you being asked to pay this price? No reason at all as Obama is merely attempting to avoid emotional discomfort. Obama will kill you like hell kill me only to avoid the feelings he has when hes confronted with the truth of who and what he is and what he has done in actual reality. Hes not afraid of a physical death sentence but of the emotional and metaphysical death sentence he will suffer. As that fear is irrational then hes irrational. Its my sworn testimony that although Ray Morton and I knew we owned trillion dollar intellectual property that far exceeds the value of US debt we could not sell it so we could not earn a living from it as then unjust men would exploit it to their advantage. A reward wasnt to be had. They would kill millions of you at once rather than kill you one at a time. They claim that they want it to then protect and defend the US but that is a lie as what they want to do is control the knowledge thus keep it from you. If they have it and you do not then you are at their mercy. A reward might never be in the cards for us under US law its an award - and we paid the ultimate price. Does

this bother us? Nope. Its difficult to watch criminals be rewarded while we suffer sometimes but we are not angry, resentful or remorseful; we are not sorry we made the decision we made for there was no other choice as any other choice is denying reality in such a way we would offend the Creator. We would be challenging universal law when like no other people on Earth we own it. What secret? Nothing is a secret if you never diminish your own capacity. Secrets do not actually exist in this universe. Unjust men would maintain control of the knowledge for about 5 seconds before China then had it as per usual. In our case even Article 1 Section 8 was violated. Do you realize how incredible this is? Article 1 Section 8 protects the founding documents as our own unique intellectual property but now we cannot benefit from that knowledge, as if the governing documents do not exist and never did? Forget our own unique property as now we were being prevented from benefitting from the scientific discovery known as US law. Ray lit up when I told him I was thinking when I entered SCOTUS directly thus legally I filed what constitutes a good copyright and good patent; I used those exact words clearly reasoning my position as SCOTUS is unique to America; Ray said I may have secured the strictest kind of patent there is then as it would not be subject to time limits as patents are. I told Ray that I had incontrovertible proof that those of us who never violate our ethic are rewarded in the long haul and that unjust men only seem to triumph; I promised Ray that in his lifetime he would be able to benefit and would be able to earn a living upon his own work. Then William Suter and Danny Bickle acted to harm us once more on Rays birthday; as this could be an injury that is self-annihilating and as I did not know it was set to happen on Rays birthday until it was too late to act? I had to find a way to make that promise come true as I keep my promises. As I sat reasoning my position in space as I have a personal and spatial relationship with The Creator an idea struck me. I named the Ft. Laramie Treaty in my first filing in SCOTUS. You must be able to enforce it not merely uphold a clause or two. I can and lucky for us the National Park Service has been holding almost all of that land in trust. Its so simple to enforce its absolutely ridiculous that no one has done it as allodial title means you

cannot make substantive changes so both the National Park Service and the Sioux have the same exact goal. Whats the problem? First you must be able to undo every contract going back to the first contract we had in Eden. You must argue federally held lands as bad then reason it forward as then youre standing upon our original governing documents including A Summary View; when Ray once told me to shut up and I did? He named that argument. Before I ever put it down anywhere! I had never even said it out loud. He: Staked his claim. So then, once you enforce the Ft. Laramie contract as thats the only justice you can ever accord the Siouxwhat happens to the fund that they never accepted?! I forgot about that fund! My reasoning was and is: Once you return the land then you return the original $20 million The People placed in trust. You return it to the very same people. The People do not get to profit from an act of injustice and the Sioux cannot be made more than whole so the balance of about $750 million would then be THE FEE YOU PAY OUT TO THE LAWYERS WHO SUCCESSFULLY MAKE THE CASE!!! These lawyers had to be righteous they are or else they never would have been able to do this. I, Susan, not once considered this money. Now I did and what motivated me? Preventing another person from being injured and maybe fatally so. I immediately wrote to Ray and said, Remember my promise? Okay Ray, the Ft. Laramie Fund how much of $750 million would make you whole? How much do you want? as by my reckoning it belongs to us once we repay the original $20 million back. Thats our fee. What is so important about this for us? This would be a particularly sweet award to receive as every single time I asked a lawyer to help I heard: Theres no money in it for me. If a lawyer had bothered to tell me they meant FEE not PROFIT then I could have said YES THERE IS but they said no money as in no profit and there is not any profit so I never named the fund or so much as considered it. That $750 million is only worth what Ray and I make it worth so its not profit but just compensation. That money is only good if we are as it has a universal value not an arbitrary value. Remember, we gifted our intellectual property to The People so if you do no more than add up the value of all of the advancements and new technology that will be made actual reality as a result of our science then you are in the trillions and trillions of dollars. Thats

why we were harmed as the potential for profit is so great in our unique case. Its larger than any other discovery so far. Its bigger than Relativity. I told Ray I was going to see to it that an actual check was issued in our names for all of that money minus $20 million as if nothing else then every lawyer alive will have to look at that check staring back at them and know: $750 million could have been mine if only I wasnt so greedy. A lawyer used to tell me all of the fantastical awards attorneys have claimed in various ways; he used to name multi-million dollar settlements that nobody could have foreseen and that some lawyer won accidentally as the lawyer never meant to do it or something changed. He was not naming giant sized class actions but the lone lawyer usually with a lone litigant that results in a huge award. Our fee then would be the largest single fee any attorney ever received and we came by it justly. How does $750 million hit you, or $350 million a piece? We could afford to give every American natural born, naturalized and illegal - a dollar a piece and wed still have about $400 million left over for ourselves. How much interest accrues per day on $400 million in cash? At the lowest, worst rate a bank offers we would be in the black until the day we died, living off of the interest alone. HA HA lawyers across the Earth, as you told us there was no money in it! You said, Theres no money in upholding US law and US case law and as there isnt, I then agreed with you. Money as you meant it? That is not to be found in The Constitution at all and anyways, it is not legal to trade the law upon money or for a profit as that then constitutes buying and selling people for a profit. You said that unless you acted to overthrow US law thus The People there was no money to be had thus you needed to be able to injure The People so I whole heartedly agreed. If you said theres no money to be had in doing the right thing I would have disagreed and told you as an award not a reward can take any form then I possessed incontrovertible proof the victory goes to the righteous whether you believe it or not. I would have told you about the award that The Creator accorded me as no court on Earth can award what I received. Once you heard my testimony? You would have known that I had to be telling the truth as I knew all of the science, science you know already or that you can check easily. I connected the dots that you couldnt. I then would have given you the Ft. Laramie argument as that

court case is about money versus currency and so valuing people as a dollar amount. But you said profit not fee so I agreed with you as its a simple fact of my life: Against the actual value of our work $750 million means there is no profit to be had!!! You still owe us a price we cannot name but $14 trillion is a start. I then wrote to every Sioux tribe informing them that they might not know it but I actually could enforce the Ft. Laramie Treaty; I told them what they might not have understood as I contacted them before. I told them that we had no evidence that Roberts had ever seen the Petitions, that Marshall ruled for the Cherokee and that all that counted was making it onto the docket as direct entry IS adjudication due to the nature of the case. Then I told them my reasoning regarding the fund and that I was going to enter the court again so that if they had any objection they needed to let me know or else that fund minus the original deposit would be our fee. American citizenship does not demand that Natives give up what makes them unique but they have never known this and thy have never been accorded an opportunity as to this day the federal government keeps money in trust for tribes thus if they need to build something like a drainage ditch they must petition the fed for the money as if they are children not adults; they must ask permission as if they are not in control of their own lives. The fed claims that we have to protect Natives from the folly of their own decisions when NO WE DONT! If you give Natives all of that money and they choose to buy a couple of million dollars worth of cotton candy? I guess theyll learn from their mistake if it is a mistake and so not do it again. If it is not a mistake? Maybe theyll buy more cotton candy; why is the fed so hot to treat them like children? To maintain control of them thats why. Its patriarchy, thats why. I received no objections. I made certain to tell them no answer then is an answer in the affirmative. The US dollar is honor bound; what you know of today began when DC was created as Hamilton got his bank in order to repay our Revolutionary War debts. We then would be the very first nation to do so thus we would have honor and so moral authority that no nation could then deny. All of this went

down within an honor bound agreement between Washington, Jefferson and Hamilton. 54 Wall Street was the address of Hamiltons home; said to have created the stock market or at least an early form of it, Hamiltons home was once an actual slave market and it is now the exact address of the NY Stock Exchange. Everything is one and the same; finally the vote has come home to roost! The reason we left a metal standard is exactly this as the legal presumption is the US will always be able to pay and we can we are able to pay as every nation agrees that our intellectual property is the most valuable thus they spend trillions each year in pursuit of it. $14 trillion is small potatoes to us. Ray and I never violated the honor bond. We not only incurred no debts but we paid in full on behalf of all of you when you never once acted for us; we wont experience a return, not even a court date? Something as tiny as a date in federal court is too much to repay upon the debt incurred by you and your existence when Cornwallis surrendered to Washington? You must be a victim of your own excess. It seems to me that you should gladly repay this debt. As It seems to me that we already took care of our own liability award. This wont cost you a cent. Think: Its a fee but it also makes Ray and I trustees. Our $750 million as it has a universal value as does as your $20 million is then the bank or the physical reserve America rests upon as it allows us to pay if we say we will so it has the same cache as our original honor bond. What other President and Commander who is also the CFO can back their word up with cold, hard cash? Im the first one to actualize the US Treasury so I bring the fortune into the Office with me. These dollars can sit and accrue interest as the interest alone is massive; as you need a representative currency until you conquer the learning curve thus go to zero paper dollars our fee is the currency you stand upon much like Hamiltons bank. Its not about money or amounts of money but about y-o-u and if you can make good on whatever bill of goods youre shoveling our way at any given time. If Ray and I wanted $750 million wed have it as it was there for the taking; we do not need paper to secure what we want and need in life as we have brains. Ray and I along with the class will demonstrate how you trade upon ownership of the knowledge not

the pieces of paper. You have everything to gain and nothing to lose but $14 trillion in debt. And no, you may not invoke the unlawful 14th Amendment to prevent the debt from being questioned. Lawyers are now promoting this idea. Even if we deny reality and so pretend the 14th Amendment is legal and was passed in accordance with the named process when it is not possible you cannot and may not claim that the very same people who corrupted the process thus created the debt may now invoke the 14th Amendment to prevent their actions from ever being questioned. If the debt itself is the product of corruption and criminal activity if it was created as a means to deny The People liberty and justice or if the debt only is as its the direct result or the direct effect of corruption turned criminal then you cannot and may then use it against The People as your defense as all you are doing is arguing in the negative until youre temporarily insane: As individuals legal standing exists as its possible but in any legal capacity standing does not exist as for legal standing to exist you had to act pro se first, turning in your commission as a lawyer not hire paid lawyers to preserve, protect and defend what is criminal activity. The lawyer who can and may defeat us does not exist as you can play one in court but you may not actually be one. Lawyers have conveniently forgotten that John Marshall said if we cannot and may not question the debt then we could not question anyone for any reason as all of it is free but has a cost; everything is political as that began when we became sapient. In Eden and at the Revolution we incurred a debt; the debt itself is political. 1871? It's political. If you go down this road then not questioning the debt as a matter of EP&DP would mean anything goes youre now asking political questions as EP&DP issues plus applying what is politically motivated as if its a matter of EP&DP when it's no where to be found in US law or US case law so you can, did and will buy the Judge via buying the vote and then mounting a ludicrous, nonexistent legal case that is itself arguably worse than anything the BVG lawyers entered as once is a mistake but twice is not. Twice is deliberate and three times is criminal bordering on the insane. Lawyers made an attempt to buy the vote thus eradicate liberty and justice but they failed as I stopped them. Now they are making a fourth, futile

attempt: Clinton, BVG & Obama 08 makes the 14th Amendment as applied to the debt #4. When I state that lawyers and men do not possess standing? Ethical men be they lawyers or doctors in a former life enter upon me or with me as they joined the class legally and automatically once Obama threatened me as the thinking of the corrupted and the criminally motivated follows this same "14th Amendment fantasy thread", kill the truth to then kill the actuality known as America aka human ration. The attorney in me says: The more appropriate but equally weak and laughable legal argument would be mandamus and so whether or not you may question the voters and then compel the voters to execute their duties as you may not do either if the question is political and if the voters acted under the authority of the US so once again you need to mount an authority case of original jurisdiction not shadow jurisdiction. You must argue that you, a lawyer, can and may sue the voters for direct injury as you, licensed lawyers who are also voters but deny that you are people thus your very existence is in violation of the EP&DP clauses, did it to yourselves, directly. Lawyers must argue that they can sue their own selves thereby questioning their own existence and if their particular type of insanity is criminal or civil. I predict the case caption will be realized as some form of "Counsel For The Plaintiff Versus The Respondent, A Federal Judge". It will only seem as if the lawyers are defending the US by attacking people not already inside the physical courthouse. Lawyers mean and intend to provoke a Response from the federal judge via his or her ruling and order without actual reason and/or actual cause ever making an appearance thus the joke's on the judge who reads this argument and doesn't know: if you're not guilty and not insane? There's no agreeing or disagreeing but only another federal question, Do you clowns mean 1776 or 1871? followed by astute social commentary resulting from centuries of trial and error that is imbued with finely honed legal acumen acquired along the way: As if you mean either one then I can't issue a ruling and order as this case is humanly impossible for any homo sapien to mount. I can mount it but I won't for if I do then this must be the National Zoo and I must be an orangutan, or so 'counsel' has alleged.

Lastly, when I claim that you have nothing to fear? You dont as we have changed it up so that the burden of proof falls on the Defendants. We are yet standing upon exactly worded law and case law while these people are not. We entered directly and they defaulted legally in court and in actual reality upon Obamas installation. To meet the burden of proof they must prove absolutely that Thomas Jefferson never lived, that we never became sapient as Eve never picked the apple, that the Earth was never formed and so the universe was never born thus The Creator does not exist; these people must prove that they do not exist and never will. To first meet us at the bar they must concede that the DC Trust was created as a criminal enterprise and that like lawyers are out of nasty tricks they are too as there is no trick available to them that will ever make them actually solvent or actually legal. They can meet us but never exceed us as what you cant exceed is The Creator. They must enter the court upon the claim that the DC Trust never was, is not now and never will be as they (it) denied the Southern states their right of dissolution, engaged in war against The People, shot Lincoln and impeached Andrew Johnson for firing the Secretary of War, Stanton, thus forcing Executive Order #100 and The Trading With The Enemies Act upon us when US history is: Abraham Lincoln reminded Secretary of State William Seward to his face that he, Lincoln, is the President and Commander in Chief not Seward no matter what Seward might mistakenly believe. Seward? He was born in Florida, New York and he purchased Alaska. It seems as if once again Florida is exactly named as is NY, Alaska and Russia; we even have a kitchen cabinet debate brewing: The Secretary of War another Cabinet position - is the person Johnson fired when he became President after Lincolns death. Johnson sought to remove Stanton and replace him with Ulysses S. Grant in violation of the Office in Tenure Act. Johnson vetoed this act meant to protect Stanton claiming it was within his power as the legal successor to Lincoln; that is Would Congress make these appointments or would the sitting President? Congress logic means Congress could force me to keep Obamas cabinet. When Johnson vetoed the act he exactly wrote in like manner appointed and duly qualified thus such an Act could protect an appointment in the

event it was not possible to execute procedural and substantive due process. An example is the Post Master General serving or delivering a commission upon or to the Chief Justice; could the Post Master be fired and/or criminally charged as this event would only occur upon endemic criminal corruption and when the Post Master himself is the direct victim of a crime? In this case the act would protect the Post Master for I then would have to invoke martial law against this person when there is an absence of any wrong doing. Its not possible to fire him for there are no grounds. This legal battle is about the balancing and counterbalancing of moral authority and legal power. Grant refused the appointment; Lorenzo Thomas acted to move into the office and Stanton had him arrested. Grant would go on to become President. The battle would go on to become Myers V US in 1926 in which the Supreme Court opined such acts were unconstitutional. I agree in that Congress is writing law and this acts express intent was to protect one person thereby giving Congress power not named in the law. I disagree in that facts are stubborn but facts change thus current conditions as you came to realize them do protect a civil servant. I, Susan, do not need an Act of Congress or a SCOTUS opinion to know as fact and law what is right or wrong. Congress did not have the requisite moral authority to impeach Johnson thus his impeachment was no good while Clintons is as nobody involved had actual moral authority thus they, Clinton and the other paid Officers, were equally bankrupt. The persons who sat in Congress when Johnson was impeached owned the knowledge that what they had done was not legal. Although his impeachment failed it never should have begun. Or maybe it should have; maybe Johnson meant to be fundamentally responsible for a Supreme Court case named In Re Susan Herbert as if you tell me that as Lincoln appointed Stanton then even if Lincoln falls Stanton does not then you are telling me even if Lincoln falls Executive Order #100 does not, and that is false as the war conducted by persons in uniform ended: Lee surrendered his sword but not in person. Lee then ended the uniformed fight only as the civil fight is rages on. This is already proven absolutely for when Johnson returned to Congress after sitting as the Executive he was given a standing ovation by the very same persons who once acted to remove him thereby us; they were wrong

and they owned it as your actions and so what you manifest are the absolute proof. The reason Johnsons impeachment failed and by one vote? 7 Senators voted against it as they were disturbed by how the proceedings had been manipulated to present evidence in support of only one side, Congress, which is the very same thing that happened to me as opposing council has never entered any evidence or proof at all, not in the family court, not in the state court, not in the federal court and not in the Supreme Court. And so here we are The People having entered the Supreme Court and having been victorious once more as the only sword that actually counts never left our possession: Is the charge, obviously falsified, that The People first violated Thou shall not kill? We wouldnt need to kill in self-defense if they would stop acting in defiance of nature. Self-defense is acting in accordance with nature not against it as The People will never not be liberated and not be independent no matter what the corrupted do or say as sapience is. The charge is levied against them not The People as the cause is nature. Fear not for you have nothing to be afraid of, as there is no defense they or any man can mount against nature. An unjust Congress was not actually remorseful then nor did it actually respect Johnson or us anymore than it does now or they would have acted to abide by the law; instead they continue to violate US law as they believe the contents of their hearts and the truth of their actions thus their persons are a secret. Thats the delusion as all of this is in plain sight; nobody ever sued as nobody ever had the capacity until I sued as BVG did not exist. I own the knowledge I am the first absolute and whole class of one in the history of the world and that this then makes me unique in all of this universe as I successfully staked the claim that the Americans are the indigenous people of Earth known as earthlings as we mastered government on Earth becoming creators in our own right, creators that are greater than the sum of our parts. Andrew Johnson is said to be one of the worst US Presidents in history. We dissent:

Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson? Caught you, pre-emptively.

Susan Forever Pro Se Herbert, on

intellectual property to The People

behalf of the class with

Susan Clemons, Ray Morton and other Voters who also gifted their

SIGNING

This is the test of Marbury V Madison therefore a signature upon a piece of paper is not the absolute proof as the person is. A signature means nothing as that person must be able to appear on their own volition to then secure liberty thus their rights and to absolutely prove they have moral authority; its chain of command theory that I have proven to be universal law for anybody can write it down on paper and enter it on paper but not everyone then can or will appear. Your ability and capacity to act is the proof and is your signature in this unique case. Every living human has a vested interest which is why I can and may write etc. et al as usually unless your name appears in the case caption you are not able to claim or levy monetary damages; in this case? Money does not equal justice and never did. The very nature of the injury makes it impossible for some to sign as what they cannot do is subject themselves to a judges value judgments thereby annihilating self as a judge (or clerk) is reducing their human dignity to a piece of paper and annihilating it when they cannot fight back on paper alone. Logistics also makes it impossible for some to place an ink signature upon the paper; amazing diversity exists plus each time we are harmed I must re-write the suit. I had to secure signing by other means as while 6 billion people have an interest only some have unique intellectual property while others merely need to enter their person as the absolute proof so then give their name when asked if my or our absolute proof is present as you cannot attach living people to your list of exhibits

plus as an award some people need to make an appearance in person as that appearance itself is then the award and will heal the injury and harm. These people might give testimony and they might not. Most of the debate will be had outside a court of law as America itself is a court of law as were all constitutional authority cases of original jurisdiction but of those not very many would make it into SCOTUS as such as these pure and absolute cases are extraordinarily rare. Following is a list of persons who signed; I did not recruit these people and they made their case to me, asking to be a part of the class with some volunteering to be named exactly. I will remind this court that somebody has taught you what is false as in 1954 there was no separate but equal black Supreme Court and in fact separate but equal was stricken so there should not be any Supreme Court for licensed lawyers only and another or no Supreme Court for The regular People nor should there be no separate or nonexistent Supreme Court for women. No Justice made this decision lawyers acting as clerks, judges and for profit hired guns made it up and then inflicted it upon The People as they and their clients truly believe and so act as if they they are superior to us when that is delusional as the last time we checked there was only one Court for One People: 1. Susan Herbert and Brian Dobry have signed in ink.

2.

Ray Morton signed using his unique business card that I Susan H., have

in my possession. Attached is a copy. Ray Morton was previously entered to SCOTUS thus recognized by SCOTUS; his unique intellectual property and his service during Vietnam also constitutes signing as he sought me out and he then entered this property; he also ran for a federal office but did not secure it so he knew as absolute fact that the Trust was insolvent and that the voters had defaulted.

3.

Susan Clemons signed via her unique intellectual property a piece of

which appears in this suit for the first time ever and via her previous recognition by SCOTUS as Clemons is the person who volunteered to level

the SCOTUS clerks thus address a possible injury that might be present among employees of SCOTUS. She also issued a declaration that was entered to he federal court and was later recognized by SCOTUS even if the clerks refused to file the good case as Stay Clerk Danny Bickle reacted to her intellectual property as did Chief Clerk William Suter; both Susan Clemons and Ray Morton are counsel for themselves and the class.

4.

Richard Pait met me and joined the exactly named class in or around

summer 2009. Pait gave me priceless intellectual property concerning the nature of the injury and how it effects men plus rape as rape is use of force not necessarily an act of sex whereby you are subjected to annihilation of self. He also gave me insight into Nixon and drowning and can testify as to what happened to his person when he died as he experienced a life beyond this one twice, once as a child and once as an adult. Over and over he signed; like other people named he received an electronic copy of the suit and all people have access to the same and its various incarnations. Attached is his business card unique to his person as while I had a copy of the brief and the suit to give him when we first met I did not have THE copy.

5.

Pryce P. met me at the library the same night as Pait. Pryce holds

allodial title to land in St. Johns County; fighting a tax issue he has been trying to secure allodial title; he named his whole case except for one point re women which he could not know; his case has already been entered to SCOTUS so he signed; attached is another ofrm of signing his business card.

6.

Al Franken & Charles Rangel: Do you know how many pieces of paper

we have signed by Franken and Rangel? Both have copies of the suit as both were contacted early on as Rangels name was entered via the IRS complaint leveling the field up to the Executive and then along with Frankens to the US Marshall and the Secret Service. I recently sent yet another copy of the suit to then give them an opportunity to remove themselves from the class as

others have done. They have not chosen to remove themselves. Both were previously recognized by the federal court and SCOTUS.

7.

Kurt Kallenbach phoned me asking to join when he happened upon my

Motion. Kallenbach conducted a one man march for liberty to DC as he knew the absolutes re BVG but could not link it together; he gave me priceless property concerning the injury the voters suffered re the Bill of Rights and about legal capacity plus human psychology: Americans do not realize their vote is an office and that once you say it out loud, read it or write it that you can never return that knowledge to your subconscious and that humans act upon their truth no matter what. In Kallenbachs case? His truth is his genius is not best expressed when he is acting as a PAID Officer not any old officer so guess what? He couldnt affix the seal but did not know why until I told him: The truth of your person, your subconscious mind! Kallenbach signed; this was recognized by the federal court, SCOTUS and the Congress convened by The People in St. Charles, Missouri as he, Kallenbach, ended up representing The People armed with the case and the good math.

8.

Tim Thomas and Linda Thomas also phoned me upon reading the

Motion and other documents. Both were recognized by the federal court and SCOTUS; both signed repeatedly and they created and maintain the website where the court record and email communication is posted for the public, www.mycountrytisof.me .

9.

Rick Webbe signed in ink; he signed his full name on his business card

upon joining the class. He suffered a civil conviction and has yet to be made whole although those involved admitted he was wronged. I first met Webbe in or around summer 2010 whereby he told me his case and that he was acting alone. Webbe and I met again and discussed the suit when the suit was actually being printed so if he COULDNT sign the paper as he couldnt wait he was taking a break from work and had to get back. Attached is a copy of his signed business card; I have the original.

10.

Henry Adams signed in actuality when he issued ruling orders in this

case; then he signed once more when he retired as that was he himself giving himself the opportunity by creating the opportunity where once none existed. Adams was recognized by the federal court and SCOTUS. Adams is in a unique situation in all of American history as lawyers and federal court employees acted to commit what are crimes against us DURING the case thereby obstructing justice and making justice impossible; once this happened the point of law became one whereby we both ascended to SCOTUS but first Adams had to act; he had to exhaust all possibilities and he did. Adams named SCOTUS exactly thus when I entered directly he then came with me.

11.

Tommy Pritchard first signed in late 2009 and then over again in 2010

and 2011. Pritchard too has priceless intellectual property re the nature of the injury and how it is realized; he also owns property concerning inorganic insanity and how prejudice hatred becomes what is best described as evil when a prejudiced person then focuses that hatred on one person or group of people rather than on everyone. Pritchard has details re two unsolved murders that occurred decades ago and were crimes of hate; in one case his own father was the ringleader and as he forced his son to be with him that night a 6 year old Tommy witnessed every gruesome detail and has been haunted ever since. Around age 7 Tommy risked his life in an attempt to secure justice and almost died. Tommy would gladly sign but he is totally illiterate due to the injury; he can not so much as write his phone number down but only recite it. He too suffered a grievous injury in the family court.

12.

A. Snitker met me when Ray and I attended a meeting to hear two

candidates espouse their platforms. Attached is his business card as he signed. The other candidate did not sign; both were given copies of at least 07-9804 & the brief. Ray vetted Snitker by asking him an EP&DP issue regarding taxes. Snitkers answer was not correct but not because he had an agenda or personal policy i.e. belief; he does not know something as he was

never taught it and has no experience of justice as that hasnt existed in his lifetime. Snitker has a copy of The Constitution in his pocket and said he refers to it; it matters not which version it is as you will be hard pressed to find any politician who actually believes there is a such thing or that he himself is subject to it. The other potential office holder reserved his right to join; remember you might not own the knowledge that default is until or unless you run for and lose an office.

13.

Ron and Cameron Gardiner signed as did Jessica and John Ashley when

they came to have cases of authority that are o.j. as in both their cases a sitting President harmed them. Gardiner is the person who showed me the books so I was able to work my way up the federal budget then compare that against the accounts to know as absolute fact that endemic criminal corruption is; the only offices that seemed to be excepted? The Justices and the Commander not the President as when I first went here Clinton had not been seated. Ron knew what might happen and he was harmed as was Jessica; because of them I was able to name $60 k exactly in my IRS whistle blowers complaint.

14.

Carl Swensson contacted me and signed; he vetted me and upon

owning the knowledge that I could make the case in person as, like I said, anybody can write it down but not anybody can then deliver the argument in person, Carl sent me the documents out of GA naming 5 Justices that then demonstrates: If this be treason? Paid elected Officers committed it first! Where we when he mentioned that he had a piece of paper I might want to see? In the Pentagon! He argued the case and so his case up to the Pentagon as he did not know I actually entered the Pentagon at first as he thought I meant on paper only; once we were in the Pentagon via reasoning and chain of command theory and he owned that I actually did enter the Pentagon, he then coughed up the piece of paper that I promised to deliver the CIA as a test of my ability; I said if theres a single sheet of paper in the Pentagon that unjust men are hiding, I will enter and abscond with it w/o the Pentagon ever seeing me coming and going, I was proving absolutely

that I am an expert CIA Agent and that there is no such thing as an actual secret according to universal law. Carl signed when he sent me this document as he was acknowledging that I had ability and capacity no other American had.

15.

Ethan and Christopher Quinones are my minor sons. I sign for them.

16.

Wen Ho Lee signed when he brought his case to The People after

federal court and then discerned the correct charge a charge he is guilty of committing as he stated; he did not cease acting and still acts as he now teaches other immigrants why passing a US citizenship test or getting the piece of paper only is not enough as you must then act upon it and so participate in the political process or else you never come to own the truth of anything and you cannot defend yourself.

17.

The Iroquois, Sioux, Hopi etc. etc. as Im Native and Marshall ruled for

the Cherokee. Thats signing and o.j. plus I entered every tribe to SCOTUS and mailed them a hard copy of the suit to ensure signing is as native salvation history is also an accurate historical record as it is undiluted and so uncorrupted. The Iroquois have a constitution that is older than the Magna Carta and almost as old as Mohammeds; the Navajo have a record of humans crossing the Pacific thus how and why you find rare X DNA in the American west; this is the Polynesians.

Legally every person is a third party; others are named within the attachments in some form and this preserves the right to appear and to be made whole via court award as they and so the exactly named class represent The People while counsel makes the case via oral argument including the good, actual science. If an exactly named person does not appear, at the very least to sit in the gallery and state their name for the record so then becoming absolute proof? In this unique case and upon

authority and o.j. then they are stricken from the exactly named class. The only form of remedy and relief they qualify for then is what is law such as liberty, freedom of expression and the vote but not other award and not qualification for Office of the President as they arent willing to preserve, protect and defend their constitution so they cant defend ours. I posted public notice that those who are exactly named as they signed or those who appear in some unique form within the case have standing so can and may be awarded an amount of currency taken from the $750 plus fund that is attached to the Ft. Laramie Treaty; I reasoned that Susan Clemons is first among equals on the list and that Ray and I are the Trustees they must petition and that if Ray and I shaft them their only thought should be, They just GAVE me an authority case of o.j. as the joke is you always were such a case but you didnt own the knowledge until an actual authority dissolved the DC Trust via insolvency and then legally claimed you as her slavesI said, Forge your own independence. Declare yourselves and mail it to me. If you want to believe it Ill tell you if your manumission papers are good or you can reason your liberation is once you affix the seal a 1st class stamp and hand it to the mailman. 1st class mail? Its one class of People; the giant sized disconnect that is not existent in US law or between the original governing documents and the Bill of Rights that is existent in the fossil record and between the Old and New Testaments? If you check, Jesus himself is an authority case of o.j. who changes up the pronouns as he sounded alien but wasnt as he talked to The Creator directly and personally and he used the 1st person I am. 1st person pronoun usage was so strange as lawyers and priests obstructed justice so that the people never used I and never acted on their own behalf and never adjudicated their own case. If a lawyer or Pharisee dictated it to you? Then it was, and they did not inform you that you had options available to you such as walking out the door. When Jesus said he was opening a door that was previously closed and that I am the light and the way he meant these people were actually ignorant ignorance was the reason not an excuse as they had no experience and not one person had ever done it so he would do it for them thereby opening the door via setting an example; follow his example and you too will go

through this door. Jesus did not speak in terms of a third person or party he was pro se and Jesus entered his case or petitioned The Creator directly. Jesus symbolizes the break or gap in the physical fossil record as Jesus himself breaks with the emotional and metaphysical reality of the old, dissolving it and instituting the new; no Jesus? No continuous line of government extending back to Eve and forward to America; no Creator? No universe so no Earth so no mankind imbued with sapience. Jesus symbolizes the godspark in man; he symbolizes the spirit of the law rather than the letter; he states the obvious so people can act upon it: Man is also divine. Jesus message was liberty and sovereignty as you are the absolute proof so you have no other person to blame. Say it this way: How can you believe in a vote you cannot see but not believe in your brother lying bloody in the street? Paper versus universal law aka actual reality not what is real: So the other disciples told him, 'We have seen the vote!' But he, Thomas Jefferson, said to them, 'Unless I see the ballots in his hands and put my finger where the hanging chads were, and place my hand into his side pocket, I will not believe BVG is an actual, fact and law based case of authority and original jurisdiction.' I will not believe Bush Jr. won, for he did not author it and did not appear to argue his own case or ours and I know who I voted for myself, plus Ive read US law and I lived US law so I own the law at work; I own its correct application. In The Supreme Court followed by Bush V Gore followed by emergency as written and submitted by lawyers is all I ever needed to see with my own eyes. Blessed are those who have not seen the vote and yet believe in law. BVG the argument is not reality but only real on the paper produced by paid lawyers as its not to be found within The Constitution or US case law; BVG proves only whats inside of the lawyers hearts and minds as well as what the paid Officers truly believe; the truth of BVG is on the pieces of paper named BVG but BVG itself does not prove The Constitution or prove the vote!

BVG the opinion that constitutes a second vote being cast by William Rhenquist? I believe it, as it has The Founders fingerprints all over it! Signing has occurred, as it reads per curiam! The lone one and the whole one! William Rhenquist accepted delivery of the single vote cast against the criminal element, when he could not see me but could only believe that like him in re Brown and like every Founder that came before us that I, a lone voter, would too believe and so rise. Rhenquist signed for the lone voter and for the class of voters thus signing is. - Susan Herbert LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Superior Court Rejection Form, directing the class here 2nd Never filed Stay Opinions Canada & Vault Copy GAs Legislature voting 5 Justices are guilty of treason, transmitted to

Speaker of House 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Obamas Freudian slip proving absolutely that service occurred Petition 09-6777 (may never have been seen by any Justice) Literacy & New Literacies College: The University Has No Clothes, from NY Magazine Complete List of evidence, entered April 4th, 2007 before any primary World Court Petition Steven Breyers Testimony Re The difference is the body is a [corpse]

13. 14. 15. 16. 17.

Motion To Reconsider Your Own Destiny and Fate & Brief, Federal Appeals Belief Systems Conversion Chart & Inorganic insanity by Susan Clemons The only legal vote cast in 2008 at a poll or via mail in ballot Who wrote Dreams Of My Father? Oprah: Driving While Intoxicated, or, The Pathology Of The Disease Known

As Addiction To Ego 18. Photographs of Kenyan birth records, supposed as we do not need any

paper to make case 19. Record of Florida Landfall by Navarro, contract with Natives within (See

entire record) 20. corpses 21. 22. 23. 24. Fundamentals re you, SCOTUS, Jefferson, machines and the whole universe From Egalitarianism to Kleptocracy & some emails to & by the class Socio-political constructs versus scientific terms (part of an email to class) American Not British English Instituted When We Declared Our Tampered with FL ballot and report of FL counties transferring the votes of

Independence 25. 26. 27. US settlement in West dating to 1300s as European ramparts are present The Eternal Golden Braid: Godel, Easher & Bach SCOTUS Petition 07-9804, the very first to enter directly since 1803!