The whole problem for the proletariancamp is to move from reaction to the offensive. This is amatter of consciousness and organisation. In these twocountries,
there’s not much consciousness and autonomous
organisation, only violence and class hatred. It's a goodplace to start but only on condition that the movement pass-es from the moment of reaction and asserts its own content,its pace and its organized will in the long term. From whatwe know at this stage, this has not happened.
Aspirations for freedom are strongly anchored in thiswave of popular revolts. For good reason. Proletarians knowvery well that any protest, even the most peaceful, will beviolentky crushed by the state. For the first time, the ex-ploited have satisfied the essential need to practice the free-doms to which they aspire in and through their own strug-gles. In the independent fight, speech frees itself, autono-mous organisation can blossom and individuals can developall their capacity for socialisation. It is only on this terrainthat the class struggle can absorb and resolve in the fire of struggle the most far-reaching libertarian aspirations of civilsociety. This type of approach is the only one appropriate todrawing a line of demarcation with democratic bourgeoisdemands.No formalisation of individual and collective free-doms in tehframework of the state is satisfactory.On one hand and worse, all formalisations of thisnature in the end favour the stabilisation of the capitalistmode of production and the reinforcement of state domina-tion of the subordinate classes. On the other hand, it wouldbe stupid to brush aside the opportunity offered right nowby the loosening of the dictatorship of capital and its stateincluding when it is crystallised in a bourgeois democraticfoundation. The rejection of an indifferent attitude towardsconstitutional and institutional democratic changes must nothowever go so far as directly or indirectly supporting theprocess of restructuration of the state. This is true evenwhen the process starts out from an action by the proletariat
and takes place “in the heat of the moment”, in a framework
of acute crisis of the state.
The entry of whole cross-sections of civil society in-to the movement on the side of the insurgent proletariat,notably in Tunisia and Egypt, undermined the purely work-ing class character of the initial revolts. This is not becausethe proletariat must in all circumstances wrap itself in asplendid isolation to affirm its interests. The capacity for theworking class in movement to draw towards itself sectorsand individuals coming from other layers of civil societyremains, in our view, a vital condition for its victory overthe dominant classes. The problem is that at this stage theproletarian cause is masked by classic democratic demandsand the power games within the dominant classes in Tunisiaas well as in Egypt. Rapidly, the insurgents have shownthemselves incapable of considering themselves as an ex-pression of a social class which is independent and withouta country. This is the case, in spite of some exceptions closeto the parts of Tunisia where it all began and the factories,offices and other places of work in Egypt where wage con-flicts and other struggles carry on after the removal of theold leader.A class which aspires not only to the overthrow of authoritarian and corrupt regimes
but also the
destruction of the state, of all states, and, above all, the revolutionary con-stitution of a centralised cooperative society, without clas-ses, without money, without exploitation and without op-pression.