Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
MULVEY, SCHUBERT Y CHASSIN Substance Use and Delinquent Behavior Among Serious Adolescent Offenders

MULVEY, SCHUBERT Y CHASSIN Substance Use and Delinquent Behavior Among Serious Adolescent Offenders

Ratings: (0)|Views: 6|Likes:
Published by Francisco Estrada

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Francisco Estrada on Jul 20, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/20/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
- - - - 
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
Oice o Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
December 2010
Pathways to Desistance
How and why do many seriousadolescent oenders stop o 
-
 ending while others continue tocommit crimes? This series o bul
-
 letins presents ndings rom thePathways to Desistance Study, amultidisciplinary investigation thatattempts to answer this question.
 Jeff Slowikowski, Acting Administrator 
Substance Use and DelinquentBehavior Among Serious AdolescentOffenders
Edward P. Mulvey, Carol A. Schubert, and Laurie Chassin
Investigators interviewed 1,354 young oenders rom Philadelphiaand Phoenix or 7 years ater theirconvictions to learn what actors(e.g., individual maturation, liechanges, and involvement withthe criminal justice system) lead youth who have committed seriousoenses to persist in or desist romoending. As a result o these interviewsand a review o ocial records,researchers have collected the mostcomprehensive dataset availableabout serious adolescent oendersand their lives in late adolescenceand early adulthood.These data provide an unprece
-
 dented look at how young peoplemature out o oending and whatthe justice system can do to pro
-
 mote positive changes in the liveso these youth.
Highlights
 
The Pathways to Desistance study ollowed more than 1,300 serious juvenileoenders or 7 years ater their conviction. In this bulletin, the authors presentsome key ndings on the link between adolescent substance use and seriousoending:
•
 
Serious/chronic oenders are much more likely than other juvenileoenders to be substance users and to qualiy as having substanceuse disorders. Substance use and oending at one age is a consis­tent predictor o continued serious oending at a later age.
•
 
Dispositional actors (e.g., sensation seeking, behavioral disinhibi­tion, poor aect regulation, stress, depression) can lead to “external­izing” behaviors such as substance use and criminal activity.
•
 
Substance use and serious oending fuctuate in similar patternsover time, suggesting a reciprocal or sequential relationship, but nocausal relationship has been proven.
•
 
Substance use and serious oending decrease in late adolescence.Understanding the actors that enable youth to desist rom thesebehaviors as they learn new skills and mature may reveal avenuesor intervention.
Ofce o Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
ojjdp.gov 
 
 
 
DECEMBER 2010
Substance Use and Delinquent Behavior Among Serious Adolescent Offenders
Edward P. Mulvey, Carol A. Schubert, and Laurie Chassin
Irdi
The nexus between substance use and oending duringadolescence has important implications or juvenile justiceinterventions. Many o the adolescents who get in trouble with the law have problems with substance use, and theiroending is tied to their involvement with drugs or alco­hol. Gaining a deeper understanding o the dynamic ebband fow o these behaviors is critical to rening treatmentapproaches and more eectively targeting prevention e­orts or adolescent oenders. The right intervention atthe right time in the development o these oenders couldorestall a lietime o substance use and oending that ueleach other in a destructive pattern.Much work has been done on the relationship betweenadolescent substance use and oending, but most studieshave ocused on general community samples or samples o atrisk youth as they begin to engage in these behaviors.These eorts have produced a sizable literature document­ing the actors related to the onset or maintenance o these behaviors independently o each other. Less researchhas ocused on the reciprocal eects o these behaviorson each other during adolescence. Also lacking is a clearunderstanding o how these behaviors play out beyond thepoint in early adulthood when youth with established his­tories o oending and substance use cease one behavioror the other (see Hussong et al., 2004, or an exception).Inormation gathered rom this vantage point, joined withextant research, will contribute to a more complete under­standing o the link between substance use and oendingand will enhance the knowledge base available to juvenile justice policymakers and practitioners.One OJJDPsponsored longitudinal study oers a par­ticularly detailed and rich picture o substance use andoending in serious adolescent oenders over time, usingregular interviews conducted over a period o 7 years atercourt involvement. The study,
Pathways to Desistance: A Prospective Study of Serious Adolescent Offenders,
ollows alarge sample o serious (overwhelmingly elony) oendersinto early adulthood, providing insight into changes acrossmultiple lie domains that contribute to oenders’ desist­ing rom or persisting in antisocial activities (Mulvey etal., 2004) (see “About the Pathways to Desistance Study”on p. 8).
1
The Pathways study is important to the juve­nile justice eld because serious oenders, such as thoseollowed in this study, drive much o the policy debate in juvenile justice (Greenwood, 2006) and present the system with some o its most vexing practical challenges. Amongits many goals, the study tests whether the relationshipsbetween substance use and oending observed in previousstudies o communitybased youth or youth in detentionalso hold or individuals who have more serious and/orchronic problems. The study also observes the joint desis­tance process or substance use and oending.This bulletin describes what is known about the relation­ships between substance use and oending based onextant research and the Pathways data. It is the beginning,rather than the end, o an involved story. Researchershave observed several interesting and relevant relation­ships between these behaviors in the sample overall and inindividuals during the 2year period ollowing their courtinvolvement. These ndings contribute to a deeper under­standing o how substance use and oending interact andaect the desistance process in these adolescents.
Wa D We Kw?
Several general statements seem warranted, given previousresearch on this topic.
J
uvenile
J
ustice
B
ulletin
2
 
 
Substance Use Problems and SeriousDelinquency Are Linked
Researchers consistently nd a strong link between sub­stance use problems and serious delinquency, regardlesso how they structure the inquiry.
•
 
Studies o youth in juvenile court demonstrate that amajority o courtinvolved adolescents have recently used illegal substances and that more serious and chron­ic adolescent oenders have used more substances andare more likely to qualiy or a diagnosis o a substanceuse disorder (Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Pro­gram, 1999; Huizinga and JakobChien, 1998; Wilsonet al., 2001; Teplin et al., 2002).
•
 
Investigators who study large samples o community  youth observe a strong association between reportedserious oending and substance use in these groups(Johnston, O’Malley, and Bachman, 2006; Ford,2005).
•
 
Researchers who ollow adolescent oenders over timend that substance use at one age is one o the mostconsistent indicators o continued serious oendingat a later age (Dembo et al., 1993; Lipsey and Der­zon, 1998; Dembo, Wareham, and Schmeidler, 2007;D’Amico et al., 2008; Hussong et al., 2004).The issue o when and how individuals develop thesecooccurring patterns o substance use and illegal activity is less clear. Some o the same actors that put an indi­ vidual at risk or involvement in criminality also put thatindividual at risk or substance use problems (Hawkins,Catalano, and Miller, 1992; Iacono, Malone, and McGue,2008; Mamorstein, Iacono, and McGue, 2009). Parentalsubstance use disorders, poor parenting, confictual amily environments, and dispositional actors such as sensationseeking and behavioral disinhibition place an adolescent athigher risk o using drugs and alcohol and/or engaging inillegal acts (Hawkins, Catalano, and Miller, 1992).In addition, adolescents with poor aect regulation, highlevels o environmental stress, or depression may usedrugs and alcohol to medicate themselves as a copingmechanism. However, these relations are less consistently ound—especially once “externalizing behaviors” (e.g.,substance use and criminal oending) are considered—and oten appear in complex interactions (Hersh and Hus­song, 2009). The relation between negative mood andalcohol use has been reported to be stronger among ado­lescents with
 fewer 
conduct problems (Hussong, Gould,and Hersh, 2008).
Substance Use and Oending Fluctuatein Similar Patterns Over Time
It is clear that these two behaviors are associated overtime, although there does not seem to be a clear progres­sion rom one to the other. Several investigators reportevidence that behavior problems and aggression at a younger age predict later adolescent illicit substance use(Henry, Tolan, and GormanSmith, 2001; Kellam et al.,1983; Mason, Hitchings, and Spoth, 2007; Wiesner, Kim,and Capaldi, 2005), escalations in use over time (Hussongand Chassin, 1998), and later diagnoses o substance abuseand dependence (Chassin et al., 1999; Disney et al., 1999).In addition, studies suggest that early substance use pre­dicts subsequent criminal behavior in adolescents (Huiz­inga, Loeber, and Thornberry, 1995; Bui, Ellickson, andBell, 2000; Ford, 2005; French et al., 2000; Loeber andFarrington, 2000).Recent advances in statistical methods (e.g., joint trajec­tory analyses) have produced other insights into thistemporal relationship. Joint trajectory analyses allow theresearcher to examine the comparability o the patterns o these two behaviors as they progress over the same timeperiod (Nagin, 2005). Research using this technique hasdemonstrated that criminal behavior and substance useollow parallel courses over time (Sullivan and Hamilton,2007), suggesting a reciprocal relationship between thetwo behaviors. Whether the relationship is sequential orreciprocal can be debated; it may be that the relationshipollows dierent patterns in dierent groups o youth. It isclear, however, that delinquent behavior and substance useproblems go hand in hand in adolescence.
Multiple Mechanisms May Link theBehaviors
Substance use and delinquency can interrelate in several ways over the course o adolescence to promote dual in­ volvement and set the stage or a dicult entry into youngadulthood.Substance use in and o itsel is certainly not the primary cause o involvement in illegal activity. Substance use,however, may initiate or heighten the risk o oendingeither independently or in conjunction with other risk ac­tors. There are several ideas about the ways that substanceuse might exert this eect, as illustrated in gure 1.Substance use and oending might have a simple recipro­cal relationship. “Being high” can lower inhibitions againstinvolvement in criminal acts (a psychopharmacologicalexplanation), and/or committing crime might be a way to obtain unds to support substance use (an instrumentalexplanation) (White et al., 2002; Goldstein, 1985). Ac­cording to this ormulation, one behavior indicates thatthe other behavior is more likely to occur.
J
uvenile
J
ustice
B
ulletin
3

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->