Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
310-Cv-03647-WHA Docket 57 Case Management Statement by Sperlein

310-Cv-03647-WHA Docket 57 Case Management Statement by Sperlein

Ratings: (0)|Views: 3,977|Likes:
Published by J Doe
http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/io-group-cases/io-group-inc-v-does-1-244/
http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/io-group-cases/io-group-inc-v-does-1-244/

More info:

Published by: J Doe on Jul 20, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/20/2011

pdf

text

original

 
 
1
 S
EPARATE
C
ASE
M
ANAGEMENT
C
ONFERENCE
S
TATEMENT
 C-10-3647
 
(WHA)
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728D. GILL SPERLEIN (172887)THE LAW OFFICE OF D. GILL SPERLEIN584 Castro Street, Suite 879San Francisco, California 94114Telephone: (415) 404-6615Facsimile: (415) 404-6616gill@sperleinlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff IO GROUP, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIASAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
IO GROUP, INC. d/b/a TITAN MEDIA, aCalifornia corporation,Plaintiff,vs.
MARIUSZ PRALAT, CAROL B.PEAL, YUNSHU KANG, CHUNRONG ZHENG, ZHI NENG WU,RUBEN MORENO, HAO XU,CHIAFEN LIN, SANG YEOL KIM,and MALGORZATA FRACZYK,individuals,
Defendants,________________________________))))))))))))))))))
CASE NO.: C-10-3647 (WHA)SEPARATE CASE MANAGEMENTCONFERENCE STATEMENT
Date: July 28, 2011Time: 3:00 p.m.Ct.Rm: 9, 19
th
Fl.
Plaintiff files this abbreviated Separate Case Management Conference Statementbecause the only two remaining defendants have defaulted.On May 24, 2011, Plaintiff Amended the Complaint specifically naming a portionof the Defendants previously identified as Does. Plaintiff immediately took steps toserve the Summons and First Amended Complaint on Defendants. Plaintiff has now
Case3:10-cv-03647-WHA Document57 Filed07/20/11 Page1 of 3
 
 
2
 S
EPARATE
C
ASE
M
ANAGEMENT
C
ONFERENCE
S
TATEMENT
 C-10-3647
 
(WHA)
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
dismissed eight of the ten named defendants. Plaintiff properly served the two remainingdefendants, Mariusz Pralat and Malgorzata Fraczyk, but they have failed to respond. TheClerk enter default against these two defendants. [Docket No. 55].With the only remaining defendants having defaulted, there are no remainingissues to be discussed at the Case Management Conference unless the Court desires to set
a cutoff date for filing Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment.
Plaintiff respectfully requests to have until August 26, 2011 to file its motion forDefault Judgment against Defendants Mariusz Pralat and Malgorzata Fraczyk.Respectfully Submitted,
 /s/ D. Gill Sperlein
Dated: July 20, 2011 ______________________________D. Gill SperleinTHE LAW OFFICE OF D. GILL SPERLEINAttorney for Plaintiff 
Case3:10-cv-03647-WHA Document57 Filed07/20/11 Page2 of 3

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->