Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this
2Activity

Table Of Contents

0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
LIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 320 - Answer to First Amended Complaint filed by d Todd Sankey. - gov.uscourts.cacd.497989.320.0

LIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 320 - Answer to First Amended Complaint filed by d Todd Sankey. - gov.uscourts.cacd.497989.320.0

Ratings:
(0)
|Views: 22|Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
07/27/2011 320 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) 1[RECAP] , Amended Complaint,,,, 231[RECAP] Answer to First Amended Complaint filed by d Todd Sankey.(Colen, Marc) (Entered: 07/27/2011)
07/27/2011 320 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) 1[RECAP] , Amended Complaint,,,, 231[RECAP] Answer to First Amended Complaint filed by d Todd Sankey.(Colen, Marc) (Entered: 07/27/2011)

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Jul 27, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/28/2011

pdf

text

original

 
 
 Liberi v. Taitz 
Case No.: 8:11-cv-00485 AG SANKEY’s Answer to First Amended Complaint pg.
1
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
Marc Steven Colen, sbn 108275Law Offices of Marc Steven Colen5737 Kanan Road, Ste. 347 Agoura Hills, CA 91301Tele: 818.716.2891Fax: 818.597.4631 Attorney for Defendants Neil Sankey,Todd Sankey, The Sankey Firm, Inc.,and Sankey Investigations, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
 Lisa Liberi, et al.,Plaintiffs, vs.Orly Taitz, et al.,Defendants ________________________)())))))))))))Case No.: 8:11-cv-00485 AG(AJWx)
NSWER TO FIRSTMENDED COMPLAINT
Honorable Andrew J. Guilford,Judge of the United States DistrictCourt, PresidingCourtroom: 10D
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 320 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 54 Page ID#:7632
 
 
 Liberi v. Taitz 
Case No.: 8:11-cv-00485 AG SANKEY’s Answer to First Amended Complaint pg.
2
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
TO: THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES APPEARING OF RECORD:COME NOW 
 
Defendants Neil Sankey, Todd Sankey, The Sankey Firm, Inc., and Sankey Investigations, Inc. [hereinafter collectively referred to as “SANKEY”] and answer the First Amended Complaint by Liberi, et al, as follows:
I. NATURE OF ACTION
1. In answer to paragraph 1 of the First Amended Complaint,SANKEY admits Plaintiffs seek damages but SANKEY denies thatPlaintiffs are entitled to any such damages.
II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2. Paragraph 2 of the First Amended Complaint contains jurisdictional allegations which require a legal conclusion and to whichno response is required. Nonetheless, SANKEY stipulates to the jurisdiction of this Court.3. Paragraph 3 of the First Amended Complaint contains venueallegations which require a legal conclusion and to which no response isrequired. Nonetheless, SANKEY stipulates that this Court is theappropriate venue.
III. PARTIES
4. In answer to paragraph 4 of the First Amended Complaint,SANKEY denies knowledge or information sufficient to admit or deny the allegations contained in said paragraph and, on that basis, denies
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 320 Filed 07/27/11 Page 2 of 54 Page ID#:7633
 
 
 Liberi v. Taitz 
Case No.: 8:11-cv-00485 AG SANKEY’s Answer to First Amended Complaint pg.
3
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
said allegations.5. In answer to paragraph 5 of the First Amended Complaint,SANKEY denies knowledge or information sufficient to admit or deny the allegations contained in said paragraph and, on that basis, deniessaid allegations.6. In answer to paragraph 6 of the First Amended Complaint,SANKEY denies knowledge or information sufficient to admit or deny the allegations contained in said paragraph and, on that basis, deniessaid allegations.7. In answer to paragraph 7 of the First Amended Complaint,SANKEY denies knowledge or information sufficient to admit or deny the allegations contained in said paragraph and, on that basis, deniessaid allegations.8. In answer to paragraph 8 of the First Amended Complaint,SANKEY denies knowledge or information sufficient to admit or deny the allegations contained in said paragraph and, on that basis, deniessaid allegations.9. In answer to paragraph 9 of the First Amended Complaint,SANKEY denies knowledge or information sufficient to admit or deny the allegations contained in said paragraph and, on that basis, deniessaid allegations.10. In answer to paragraph 10 of the First Amended Complaint,SANKEY denies knowledge or information sufficient to admit or deny the allegations contained in said paragraph and, on that basis, deniessaid allegations.11. In answer to paragraph 11 of the First Amended Complaint,SANKEY denies knowledge or information sufficient to admit or deny the allegations contained in said paragraph and, on that basis, denies
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 320 Filed 07/27/11 Page 3 of 54 Page ID#:7634

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->