Page2
IARCCLASSIFIESRADIOFREQUENCYELECTROMAGNETICFIELDSASPOSSIBLYCARCINOGENICTOHUMANS
ResultsTheevidencewasreviewedcritically,andoverallevaluatedasbeing
llmited'
amongusersofwirelesstelephonesforgliomaandacousticneuroma,and
tnoaeauate'
todrawconclusionsforothertypesofcancers.Theevidencefromtheoccupationalandenvironmentalexposuresmentionedabovewassimilarlyjudgedinadequate.TheWorkingGroupdidnotquantitatetherisk;however,onestudyofpastcellphoneuse(uptotheyear2004),showeda40%increasedriskforgliomasinthehighestcategoryofheavyusers(reportedaverage:30minutesperdayovera10-yearperiod).ConclusionsDrJonathanSamet(UniversityofSouthernCalifornia,USA),overallChairmanoftheWorkingGroup,indicatedthat"theevidence,whilestillaccumulating,isstrongenoughtosupportaconclusionandthe28classification.Theconclusionmeansthattherecouldbesomerisk,andthereforeweneedtokeepaclosewatchforalinkbetweencellphonesandcancerrisk.""Giventhepotentialconsequencesforpublichealthofthisclassificationandfindings,"saidIARCDirectorChristopherWild,"itisimportantthatadditionalresearchbeconductedintothelong-term,heavyuseofmobilephones.Pendingtheavailabilityofsuchinformation,itisimportanttotakepragmaticmeasurestoreduceexposuresuchashands-freedevicesortexting."TheWorkingGroupconsideredhundredsofscientificarticles;thecompletelistwillbepublishedintheMonograph.Itisnoteworthytomentionthatseveralrecentin-pressscientific
articles"
resultingfromtheInterphonestudyweremadeavailabletotheworkinggroupshortlybeforeitwasduetoconvene,reflectingtheiracceptanceforpublicationatthattime,andwereincludedintheevaluation.AconcisereportsurnmanzmgthemainconclusionsoftheIARCWorkingGroupandtheevaluationsofthecarcinogenichazardfromradiofrequencyelectromagneticfields(includingtheuseofmobiletelephones)willbepublishedinTheLancetOncologyinitsJuly1issue,andinafewdaysonline.
2
'Limitedevidenceofcarcinogenicity':
ApositiveassociationhasbeenobservedbetweenexposuretotheagentandcancerforwhichacausalinterpretationisconsideredbytheWorkingGrouptobecredible,butchance,biasorconfoundingcouldnotberuledoutwithreasonableconfidence.
3
'Inadequateevidenceofcarcinogenicity':
Theavailablestudiesareofinsufficientquality,consistencyorstatisticalpowertopermitaconclusionregardingthepresenceorabsenceofacausalassociationbetweenexposureandcancer,ornodataoncancerinhumansareavailable.
4
a.'Acousticneuromariskinrelationtomobiletelephoneuse:resultsoftheINTERPHONEinternationalcase-controlstudy'(theInterphoneStudyGroup,inCancerEpidemiology,
inpress)
b.'EstimationofRFenergyabsorbedinthebrainfrommobilephonesintheInterphonestudy'(CardisetaI.,OccupationalandEnvironmentalMedicine,
inpress)
c.'RiskofbraintumoursinrelationtoestimatedRFdosefrommobilephones-resultsfromfiveInterphonecountries'(CardisetaI.,OccupationalandEnvironmentalMedicine,
inpress)
d.'LocationofGliomasinRelationtoMobileTelephoneUse:ACase-CaseandCase-SpecularAnalysis'(AmericanJournalofEpidemiology,May24,2011.[Epubaheadof
print],
IARC,150CoursAlbertThomas,69372LyonCEDEX08,France-Tel:+33(0)472738485-Fax:+33(0)472738575
©
IARC2011-AllRightsReserved.