Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Canada
French fries are not a vegetable, and broccoli is not grown already plasticwrapped in a supermarket cooler. Yet, in many households across Canada and North America, there is a greater intimacy with McDonalds than with the planting of squash or the taste of a truly ripe tomato. Our food culture promotes whatever gets us out the door and ready for work. We spend less time eating and gardening than ever before. With 80% of Canadians living in urban zones, it has been easy to separate from an agrarian past in which agricultural self-reliance was the norm. (Statistics Canada, 2011). It was not until the green revolutions development and emphasis of industrial agricultural practices in the early part of the 20th century that it became possible for people to think they could leave the land entirely (Khush, 1999). Since 1921, employment in the agricultural sector has decreased 93.93% (Statistics Canada, 2009). We do not work on farms; we do not live on farms. We rarely even see the places where our food comes from. We are alienated from food production. The results of this disconnection are significant. Canadians are witnessing increasing rates of obesity, heightened risk of food contamination, and inflated food prices. As a result, many people are starting to seriously consider the question of how to feed themselves for the first time since the 1950s. One of the answers is the rejuvenation of urban agriculture, dusting off pitchforks and turning soil in a new grow-your-own food culture. In this article, we will explore four modern motivations for urban agriculture in Canada: an increasing obesity epidemic, fear of food insecurity, heightened food prices, and a desire to make environmentally sound food choices. Canadian urban agriculture organizations are beginning to address these massive problems. We will highlight their work, concluding with a discussion of a new urban farm that we helped to initiate.
190
:
. gardening . 2 Victory Garden , . Franklin D. Roosevelt 1943 42% . , . , . 1960 1970 , . , . 1978 City Farmer . 1980 , , .
Victory garden posters
URBAN AGRICULTURE
. community garden . , . . food bank . . . 1996 8 , 2020 3 5 4 . , , , .
191
:
. 3 1 , 1978 2004 250% . , , , . , , , , , . . 3 , . . . Michigan State University 1 1.4 , 5 3.5 . . Foodshare . . , . , . market garden , . . , .
:
1 192 , . 2009 . 80 .
192
20 . , . . . . . 2002 88%, , 4 1, 9% . , , . 2 , . The Los Angeles Times , , , , , , , . . , . Community Sponsored Agriculture, CSA . 300 600 . Inner City Farms 18 , , . . Meet Your Farmer , . . . . , . , , . , . 2 3 60 . .
occurred at a meat packing plant in Quebec, killing over twenty people (McKie & Cribb, 2008). The number of diseases and outbreaks due to food safety are numerous and very public, increasing the demand for safe products. There is little transparency in the food industry. Understaffed and weakened regulators do not have the capacity to test every food product before it hits shelves. Imported food is even more difficult to inspect. In 2002, 88% of fresh fruit was imported, roughly half of fresh vegetables, a quarter of red meat, and 9% of eggs (Statistics Canada, 2002). Inspections for imported foods often on third party contacts. As imports have increased, so have reports of pesticide-laden vegetables, kidney-failure inducing melamine in milk products, and improper labeling of international organic produce. Even the Chinese execution of two executives charged with knowingly producing tainted food has not stymied unsafe food practices in that country. As reported by The Los Angeles Times, Chinas food supply includes, diseased pigs used for bacon; noodles made of corn, ink and paraffin; rice contaminated with heavy metals, sausages made of rotten meat and fertilizer; and pork described as Tron blue because itglowed in the dark from bacteria (Pierson, 2011). Consumers are increasingly wary of the food products available at traditional market outlets. One response has been for consumers to grow their own or to purchase food from local markets where it is possible to meet and connect with the producer. Community Sponsored Agriculture (CSA) programs have exploded in popularity in part because consumers can connect with their farmer. In return for an upfront cost of roughly $300 to $600, customers receive a box of produce each week during the growing season. Vancouver based Inner City Farms has transformed 18 back, front, and side yards using an innovative design approach. The food is literally grown next door, making the whole growing process transparent, thus minimizing fears of food tampering. Inner City Farms hosts Meet Your Farmer events, where customers have the opportunity to discuss food production and methods with the organization, bringing individuals into the process and engaging customers concerns and interests. Urban agriculture brings the whole system of production within reach of the urban consumer. There are no factories and no secret, patented processes. It is an open system that helps to alleviate concerns of food safety (Inner City Farms, 2011). Each inner-city farm is expertly maintained and planted according to the firms design principles. Waves, instead of farm rows, bamboo fences, and ornamental planting all make Inner City Farms one of highest demanded urban farm organizations in the City of Vancouver. Owned by five young entrepreneurs, they employ one full time farmer. In their second season they have increased their customer base three fold to 60 CSA customers. More land has been donated to the organization than they can use.
URBAN AGRICULTURE
193
:
2011 . 2000 United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization 157% . , . . . . , . . . SoleFood . . , . 2010 8 , 2011 . , . , . . . . , . . . .
:
. , . , , . 1950 1998 1 4 . Chesapeake Bay
194
Gulf of Mexico . 2 5 5 , 38% . , , , . . 1.2 10 . Ontario Waterloo 16,918 . . Urban Farm sprout , . . , , . , . .
including the Chesapeake Bay and the Gulf of Mexico. Land degradation from agriculture has consumed 550 million hectares of formerly arable land since World War II, an area equivalent to 38% of all farmland today. The environmental hazards caused by industrial food production also include ubiquitous pesticide and preservative use that contributes to a multitude of human health hazards, loss of biodiversity, and international deforestation (Horrigan, Lawrence, & Walker, 2002). The distance between food production and consumption provides environmental burdens of its own. Food needed for a year to sustain one average household requires the equivalent transportation of 1.2 tons of food 100,000 kilometers (Weber & Matthews, 2008). In the Waterloo region of Ontario, emissions caused by transit and production for the 10 major products of imported food equates to the annual equivalent of 16,918 vehicles on the road (Marc Xuereb, 2005). The demand for an alternative to industrially produced food is immense and many urban farmers are trying to satisfy those consumers. My Urban Farm is a small organization; with two part time employees growing sprouts for local consumption. My Urban Farm is bicycle-powered business. Product, from start to finish, is transported using bicycle. The produce is grown according the best organic practices, ensuring that there are no pesticides, herbicides or chemical fertilizers. This urban farm is a first attempt to build an environmentally focused local food system. The growth of urban farming will help minimize industrial food production for intensive products and the impact they have on the environment.
URBAN AGRICULTURE
195
Coast of Canada at the beginning of 2009. Working with the city, they articulated a re-interpretation of the historic green necklace, a series of interconnecting parks and boulevards built in 1907 as part of the masterplan of the City of North Vancouver. These re-imagined parks support urban farming. The city would supply the land, while non-profit organizations would assume management of the farm, keeping any revenues generated from the sale of produce. Understanding if and how urban farming could be a financial success would drive the mission of the farm (Proksch, G., Roehr, 2010a)(Proksch, G., Roehr,
Green necklace
2010b). To begin the process, greenskins lab worked in close consultation with a
. University of
British Columbia
number of city councilors to understand the political and bureaucratic process for developing projects of this sort. In consultation with the city it was decided that Loutet Park Urban Farm would serve as a five-year case study to accrue more knowledge on the financial viability of this type of farming. For us, Loutet Farm was also an opportunity to test integration of urban farming into public space. To build any project and to integrate into the community, it is essential to build local partnerships. In our case, we partnered with the North Shore neighborhood House, a community development organization, and the Edible Garden Project, an organization with farming knowledge and experience. These community groups took ownership of the Loutet Park Urban Farm and became the formal intermediary between the city and the community. Two part-time farmers were hired by the North Shore Neighborhood House to develop farm plans and rotations. Professional farmers are an essential part of a successful urban farm. Plant growth and development are different in each location. Ensuring that urban farmers are comfortable with the season and are able to adjust and change their farm plan as needed, can help make the difference between financial success and failure. Furthermore, by providing employment, the space immediately begins giving back to the community. The farmers helped greenskins lab to create designs for a working yet aesthetically pleasing space. Armed with more information and design concepts, greenskins lab was able to paint a picture of urban agriculture in North Vancouver, thereby creating more interest in the project
, . . .
196
Loutet axonometric
URBAN AGRICULTURE
. , . . . , , , . . . . . , . . . . . . , , . . , , .
from residents, officials, and corporate sponsors. It was evident that the initial concept of Loutet Park changed over time and in response to the community of which it is a part. Three key lessons were learned throughout this process. First, aesthetic coherence, when not mandated by the municipality is difficult to achieve. Food production and farming has its own set of aesthetics that often contradict with the design concepts of parks and gardens of urban centers. Building tools to help bridge that gap will help further the development of urban farming. Second, securing appropriate funding for projects of this size is difficult. The private realm has been incredibly generous through financial and in-kind donations. Funding the initial build remains a high hurdle for many urban farming projects. Academic research grants are only now beginning to funnel this way as researchers become more aware of entrepreneurial programs. Thirdly, volunteers are critical. A consistent core group of committed volunteers are necessary to organize and support any urban farm project. Whether through building, planting, or security, community involvement is an essential part of any urban farm. It is imperative to spend time and capital building that community. Landscape architects can and should assist in building new designs for urban food production and helping create policies that structure how farms should be built. Guidelines and frameworks can help urban farmers build spaces that beautify and connect the community in addition to focusing on food production and economic rejuvenation. As more parkland comes under consideration for urban farming, it will become increasingly important to
197
. . , .
build specific guidelines integrating such programs into the existing structures of the park. Landscape architects should help develop those guidelines. The greatest role for landscape architects is to help articulate a vision for urban farms, helping cities and individuals first see what these projects can be and how they can design them.
. , , . . . , , , . . , . , , . , . . . , .
Urban Farming
People are clamoring for a way to connect with their food. An increased awareness of systemic problems with our food systems has led to a grassroots approach to urban agriculture across North America, resulting in diverse and creative means of addressing
Loutet Farm
questions of food equity and food quality. The Urban landscape is not as concrete as it seems. Community gardening provides an incredible opportunity for neighbors and community members to develop relationships through shared work. Urban farming is different. Its practitioners work long days and often nights to reap and sow, package and market. They are transforming the city through more than just their productive use of the land. Urban farmers are developing local food markets and producing food choice just by showing up at the market. Both local rural and urban farms build a market where citizens can use dollars to vote for local businesses over national chains, environmentally sustainable food over conventional agriculture, and a food culture that values its producers. When beneficial social programs also make good business sense, there is true possibility for change. Place those values on opposite sides of the debate and it becomes virtually impossible to move forward. Urban farming connects two important goals: food sustainability and economic profit. In the coming weeks and months, greenskins lab and other researchers at the University of British Columbia will monitor Loutet Park Urban Farm, along with a number of other urban farms in the City of Vancouver to understand how these organizations operate their businesses. This information will prepare other cities and municipalities to build urban farms and marry both sustainability and economic development.
198
Bibliography
- Alaimo, K., Packnett, E., Miles, R. A., & Kruger, D. J. (2008). Fruit and vegetable intake among urban community gardeners. Journal of nutrition
of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 28(12), 1569-74. doi:
10.1038/sj.ijo.0802795. - Hewitt, P. (2009, February 1). More peanut products recalled in salmonella investigation. The Globe and Mail. - Horrigan, L., Lawrence, R. S., & Walker, P. (2002). How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environmental health perspectives, 110 (5), 445-56. Retrieved from www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1240832&tool=pmc entrez&rendertype=abstract. - Huybrechts, I., Bourdeaudhuij, I. D., & Henauw, S. D. (2011). Environmental Factors: Opportunities and Barriers for Physical Activity, and Healthy Eating. In L. A. Moreno, I. Pigeot, & W. Ahrens (Eds.),
URBAN AGRICULTURE
Websites of Interest
www.greenskinslab.sala.ubc.ca www.ediblegardenproject.com/what-we-do/loutet-farm www.cityfarmer.info www.vancouverfoodpolicycouncil.ca www.vancouver.ca/commsvcs/southeast/documents/index.htm(Urban Agriculture Strategy document) www.innercityfarms.com www.foodshare.net/index.htm http://myurbanfarm.ca/
199