Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
MEC Rate Increase - Rate Case Procedural Order

MEC Rate Increase - Rate Case Procedural Order

Ratings: (0)|Views: 25 |Likes:
Published by hsmathers

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: hsmathers on Aug 04, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/04/2011

pdf

text

original

 
1234567
8
9
101112131415161718
19
20212223
I
24
BEFORE
ZOMMISSIONERS3ARY PIERCE
-
Chairman30B STUMPSANDRA
D.
KENNEDY’AUL NEWMAN3RENDA BURNS
THE ARIZONA
N
THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OFMOHAVE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE,NCORPORATED, AN ELECTRICZOOPERATIVE NONPROFIT MEMBERSHIPCORPORATION, FOR A DETERMINATION OFTHE FAIR VALUE
OF
ITS PROPERTY FORRATEMAKING PURPOSES, TO FIX A JUST ANDREASONABLE RETURN THEREON AND
TO
4PPROVE RATES DESIGNED TO DEVELOPSUCH RETURN.
BY
THE
COMMISSION:
1
.
1,
_.-
-A
DOCKET NO. E-O1750A-11-0136
RATE CASEPROCEDURAL ORDER
On March 30, 201 1, Mohave Electric Cooperative, Incorporated ((‘MEC” or “Company”)?led with the Arizona Corporation Commission ((‘Commission’’) an application for a determination
if
the fair value of its property for ratemaking purposes, to fix a just and reasonable return thereon,md to approve rates designed to develop such return.On April 27,201 1 MEC filed a letter stating that the Company agreed to waive the time clockFordetermining the sufficiency
of
its rate application.On May 27, 201 1, MEC filed Supplemental Direct Testimony and Schedules with CalendarYear 2010 data.On June 27, 20 1 1, the Commission’s Utilities Division (“Staff
)
filed its Letter
of
Sufficiencyindicating that MEC’s application satisfied the requirements of Arizona Administrative Code(“A.A.C.”) R14-2-103 and classifying the Company as a Class A utility.On June 27,201 1, Staff filed a Proposed Procedural Schedule for Filing Dates.On July 1,2011, Staff filed Revised Proposed Schedule for Filing Dates which recommended
a
compressed schedule compared to the original proposed schedule.On July 6, 201 1, MEC filed a Response to Staffs Revised Proposed Schedule for Filing
S:UINodes\Mohave Electric
Co-op
110136\110136rcpoClassA.doc
1
 
12345
6
789101112131415
16
17181920DOCKET
NO.
E-O175OA-11-0136Dates. The Company indicated that it supports Staffs proposed revised schedule.IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the hearing in the above-captioned matter is hereby;cheduled to commence on March
19,2012,
at
1O:OO
a.m., at the Commission’s offices,
1200
WestWashington Street, Hearing Room
No.
1, Phoenix, Arizona 85007.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a pre-hearing conference shall be held on March
16,2012,
at
1O:OO
a.m., for the purpose of scheduling witnesses and the conduct of the hearing.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Staff Report and/or direct testimony, except cost ofservice and rate design testimony, and associated exhibits to be presented at hearing on behalf ofStaff shall be reduced to writing and filed on or before November
30,2011.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that direct testimony, except cost
of
service and rate designtestimony, and associated exhibits to be presented at hearing on behalf of intervenors shall be-educed to writing and filed on or before November
30,2011.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that direct cost of service and rate design testimony andissociated exhibits to be presented at hearing on behalf of Staff or intervenors shall be reduced towriting and filed on or before December
19,2011.
IT
IS
FURTHER ORDERED that rebuttal testimony and associated exhibits to bepresented at hearing by MEC shall be reduced to writing and filed on or before January
18,2012.
IT
IS
FURTHER ORDERED that surrebuttal testimony and associated exhibits to bepresented by Staff or intervenors shall be reduced to writing and filed on or before February
8,2012.
IT IS FURTHER
ORDERED
that any rejoinder testimony and associated exhibits to bepresented at the hearing on behalf of MEC shall be reduced to writing and filed on
or
beforeFebruary
29,2012.
IT
IS
FURTHER ORDERED that all filings shall be made by
4:OO
p.m. on the date thefiling is due, unless otherwise indicated above.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any objections to testimony or exhibits that have been2
 
I
23
~
4
I
5
I
6
I
78910111213141516171819
20
I
21
22
I
23
I
24
I
25
~
26
I
27
I
28DOCKET
NO.
E-O1750A-11-0136prefiled
as
of February
29, 2012,
shall be made before or at the March
16,
2012,
pre-hearingconference.IT
IS
FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall individually prepare, and bring to thepre-hearing conference, copies
of
an
issues matrix setting forth all disputed issues in the case.Each party’s matrix shall indicate the position of each party on each disputed issue and shallindicate whether the disputed issue remains in dispute or has been resolved, in prefiledtestimony or otherwise.IT
IS
FURTHER ORDERED that all testimony filed shall include
a
table of contents whichlists the issues discussed.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any substantive corrections, revisions, or supplements toprefiled testimony, with the exception of rejoinder testimony, shall be reduced to writing and filed nolater than five calendar days before the witness
is
scheduled to testify. Substantive corrections,revisions, or supplements to prefiled rejoinder testimony shall be reduced to writing and presented onthe first day of hearing.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall prepare a brief, written summary of theprefiled testimony of each of their witnesses and shall file each summary at least
two
workingdays before the witness is scheduled to testify.IT
IS
FURTHER ORDERED that copies of summaries shall be served upon theAdministrative Law Judge, the Commissioners, and the Commissioners’ aides as well as the partiesof record.IT
IS
FURTHER ORDERED that intervention shall be in accordance with A.A.C. R14-3-105,except that all motions to intervene must be filed on or before November
4,2011.
IT
IS
FURTHER ORDERED that discovery shall be as permitted by law and the rules andregulations of the Commission, except that until January
18, 2012,
any objection to discoveryrequests shall be made within 7 calendar days of receipt’ and responses to discovery requests shall bemade within 10 calendar days of receipt. Thereafter, objections to discovery requests shall be made
The date
of
receipt
of
discovery requests is not counted
as
a calendar day, and requests received after
4:OO
p.m.
MST
will be considered as received the next business day.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->