Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
How to Destroy Islam Non Violently

How to Destroy Islam Non Violently

Ratings: (0)|Views: 56 |Likes:
Published by Gilbert Hanz

More info:

Published by: Gilbert Hanz on Aug 04, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





How to destroy Islam - non-violentlyIf we don't destroy Islam as an ideology it will exterminate usculturally and physically
 Islam is an utterly ruthlesstotalitarian political system disguised as a religion.Islam
will literallystop at nothing to achieve its objective of world domination,with all non-
Muslims exterminated or enslaved. Muslims who deny this are lying (Muslims areencouraged to tell liesto further the expansion of Islam).Terrorism is an intrinsic and
inseparable part of Islam.
Consequently, the ideology of Islam MUST be defeated. It must be consigned to thedustbin of history along with those other vicious totalitarianisms - Nazism andCommunism. The alternative is our extermination as a civilisation, and the wholeworld being plunged into an endless theocratic Dark Age.
There can be no violent solution
In an age of nuclear weapons, the option of exterminating Islam the way weexterminated Nazism - by world war - is unthinkable. Apart from anything else, thereis no guarantee that the West could win an all-out World War III against Islam. Ourinfrastructure, government and militaryhave been too far infiltrated by jihadists.
There would be thousands ofFort Hoodstyle massacres of our troops if a war brokeout between Dar al-Harb and Dar al-Islam, not to mention massive sabotage of militaryand civilian infrastructure and violent intifadas in Muslim-dominated cities throughoutthe West.
 This is not to say that the Muslims would win a World War either. The victors of WWIIIwould be well-organised authoritarian states with small Muslim populations who wouldbe prepared to be ruthless in keeping their Muslims in order. China springs to mind.
A new cold war
 The only option for defeating Islam is to undermine it in the same way we underminedcommunism - by a slow process of ideological warfare.
Altering the spiritual and material cost/benefits of being a Muslim
 Like other religions, Islam promises spiritual benefits from being a member of the cult- namely avoidance of hell and entry into paradise, which in Islam's case is a well-appointed brothel in the sky. But unlike other religions, Islam also offers materialbenefits in the here and now, for example immunity to normal laws, superior status toall non-Muslims (dhimmis) andsanctified rape and pillage where the victims are non-Muslims.Adherence to any belief system usually has two components - faith and conformity. InIslam, as with communism, the forces of conformity are very strong and are imposedwith murderous ruthlessness. Nevertheless, once the faith has gone, the habits ofconformity will become an empty shell, which will eventually implode.So we need to attack Islam on both fronts, by demonstrating that the spiritual benefitsof the 'faith' are bogus - Islam is confidence trick set up by a ruthless megalomaniac,we also need to decrease the benefits of conformity by increasing the costs andreducing benefits of being a Muslim in the material world here and now.
Destroying and replacing Muslim beliefs
Islam may appear hard, but it is also brittle. A small crack anywhere is the structurecan spread throughout. Islam claims that the Koran is the literal word of God, whichwas dictated to, but not written by, Mohammed.So it's an all-or-nothing cult. Any fault in the Koran, or doubts as to the truthfulness ofMohammed, can cause the whole system to disintegrate. Muslims alreadysubconsciously realise this, because they fly into tantrums whenever eitherMohammed or the Koran is'disrespected'. Under Sharia lawany criticism or either
Mohammed or the Koran is blasphemy which is punished by death.
This paranoid, hypersensitive defensiveness and outrage at criticism are not thereactions of a confident belief system, but of an information-control cult. Thesereactions are evidence of an attempt to protect a fatal vulnerability, an attempt tocover an Achilles heel.The location of that Achilles heel was amply demonstrated by theSatanic Versesaffair,theMotoons rage,and by theOIC's insidious attempts to introduce global laws
against 'blasphemy' of Mohammed. The Muslims themselves have shown us their most
vulnerable spot, which is the questionable (though unquestioned) character of the'Prophet' himself. We need to satirise and ridiculebaby-bonking Mountil the Muslims
fly into uncontrollable tantrums, then ridicule them even more for their tantrums, andrepeat the process until they froth at the mouth and steam comes out of their ears.
esus, Buddha and Mohammed.
 Unlike the two other religions that have a single founder, Islam is uniquely and solelydependent upon the truthfulness of that founder.Christianity is based on a long tradition of Jewish religion (Christians would say it is
the culmination of that tradition), and the Bible was written bynumerous authors. Jesus himself did not produce the Christian scriptures. His teachings wereindependently recorded by his disciples.Buddhism has philosophical and yogic foundations which are claimed to beindependently reproducible by anyone who follows the Buddha's reasoning andinstructions ('Four seals of Dharma'). "Anyone who accepts these four seals, evenindependently of Buddha·s teachings, even never having heard the name Shakyamuni

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->