Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
LIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 333.2 - 2 Memorandum of Points and Authorities - gov.uscourts.cacd.497989.333.2

LIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 333.2 - 2 Memorandum of Points and Authorities - gov.uscourts.cacd.497989.333.2

Ratings: (0)|Views: 16|Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
08/04/2011 333 OPPOSITION to MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint 329[RECAP] Table of Contents; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support thereof; Decl of Philip J. Berg, Esquire; Proposed Order; and Certificate of Service filed by Plaintiffs PHILIP J. BERG, GO EXCEL GLOBAL, Lisa Liberi, LISA M. OSTELLA, THE LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG. (Attachments: # 1 Table of Contents, # 2 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, # 3 Declaration of Philip J. Berg, Esquire, # 4 Proposed Order, # 5 Certificate of Service)(Berg, Philip) (Entered: 08/04/2011)

08/04/2011 333 OPPOSITION to MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint 329[RECAP] Table of Contents; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support thereof; Decl of Philip J. Berg, Esquire; Proposed Order; and Certificate of Service filed by Plaintiffs PHILIP J. BERG, GO EXCEL GLOBAL, Lisa Liberi, LISA M. OSTELLA, THE LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG. (Attachments: # 1 Table of Contents, # 2 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, # 3 Declaration of Philip J. Berg, Esquire, # 4 Proposed Order, # 5 Certificate of Service)(Berg, Philip) (Entered: 08/04/2011)

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Aug 05, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/24/2012

pdf

text

original

 
Liberi, et al Mem of Pts & Auth in Support of their Opp to YosefTaitzMTD 08.04.2011
112345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
Philip J. Berg, EsquirePennsylvania I.D. 9867
LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531Telephone: (610) 825-3134E-mail: philjberg@gmail.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,SOUTHERN DIVISION
LISA LIBERI, et al, Plaintiffs,vs.MS. TAITZ, et al,Defendants.::::::::::::::::::::CIVIL ACTION NUMBER:
8:11-cv-00485-AG (AJW)PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM OFPOINTS AND AUTHORITIES INSUPPORT OF THEIR RESPONSEINOPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT,YOSEFTAITZ, INDIVIDUALLY,MOTION TO DISMISS
Date of Hearing: August 29, 2011Time of Hearing: 10:00 a.m.Location: Courtroom 10D
I.FACTS:
1.Plaintiffs originally filed suit on May 4, 2009 in Pennsylvania against theDefendants, including Defendant YosefTaitz[“Mr. Taitz”]. At the time suit was filed,Plaintiffs had reason to believe Taitz ran and had control of his wife’s website/blog,http://drorly.blogspot.comas had set-up her dental practice website.2.In or about the beginning of 2010, Plaintiffs learned that Defendant OrlyTaitz[“Ms. Taitz”]had obtained Plaintiffs private datafrom Defendants,Reed Elsevier,Inc.; LexisNexis, Inc.;LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc.; LexisNexis ChoicePoint, Inc.;
 Attorney for Plaintiffs
 
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 333-2 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 25 Page ID#:7953
 
Liberi, et al Mem of Pts & Auth in Support of their Opp to YosefTaitzMTD 08.04.2011
212345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
LexisNexis Seisint, Inc. d/b/a Accurint;LexisNexis Group, Inc.;LexisNexis Risk andInformation Analytics Group, Inc. [“Reed Defendants”];and Defendant Intelius, Inc. The private data obtained, without any type of permissible purpose, include but is
not
limitedto Plaintiffs Social Security Numbers; dates of birth; place of birth; mother’s maidennames; spouses names; Plaintiffs Lisa Liberi [“Liberi”] and Lisa Ostella [“Ostella”]maiden names; address information; credit data; credit reports; financial data and other  private data[“Private Data”]that is maintained by State and Government entities.Defendant Ms. Taitzused the private data of the Plaintiffs to carry out her threat anddestroy them.3.During this same time, Plaintiffs also discovered that Mr. Taitzwas partnered with Elsevier MDL, which is part of Reed Elsevier, Inc. owner and operator of all the Reed Defendants. It was also discoveredthat Mr. Taitz was partnered with Oracle.4.Mr. Taitzstarted the company Defendant Daylight Chemical InformationSystems, Inc. [“Daylight”], in or about 1986. Mr. Taitzis the “hands-on” CEO oDaylight. Mr. Taitzwas involved with the design of Daylight’sprograms, software andhardware.5.Mr. Taitzand Daylight’s toolkits provide programming interfaceapplications which are built into the design and used with Oracle. The design allows for remote application execution, cross sitescripting, remote interface and injection attacks,which are vulnerabilities which Oracle, Daylight and Taitz were aware of.6.Interestingly, Mr. Taitzstates in his Motion to Dismiss [“MTD”] that thesestatements are confusing, tenuous, and unintelligible. Mr.Taitzthen states,“what are
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 333-2 Filed 08/04/11 Page 2 of 25 Page ID#:7954
 
Liberi, et al Mem of Pts & Auth in Support of their Opp to YosefTaitzMTD 08.04.2011
312345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
“interface applications” or “remote application execution”, “cross site scripting”, “remoteinterface” and “injection attacks”?[“Taitz MTD, pgs. 1-2, Para“B1 through B3”]. Mr.Taitz counsel must
not
have conferred with their client, Mr. Taitz, and/or does
not
understand the workings of databases and/or the Internet. These statements, phrasesandlanguagewere taken directly from Mr. Taitz’s Manuals he prepared for DefendantDaylight’s products,located on his website at daylight.com.
See
also Exhibits “141”through “144”, Mr. Taitz’s Manuals for Daylight filed with this Court on May 20, 2011and appearing in this Court’s Docket as Docket Entry No.’s [“Dktno.”] 190, 190-26 and190-27.7.Mr. Taitzthen attempts to confuse this Court with twisting what thePlaintiffs have outlined in their Complaint. Mr. Taitzstates
“… he through Daylight CIS has designed computer systems which other Defendants …have allegedly used to violate plaintiffs’ privacyrights…Plaintiffs do not allege that Moving defendant personally, hasdone anything violating their privacy rights but instead that his corporation, Daylight CIS” has designed and provided computer systems which others then allegedly used toinvade Plaintiffs privacy…
[Taitz MTD Para. I-B, sub paragraph 4, on pg. 3] Thisis
not
what Plaintiffs stated at all.8.Plaintiffs stated on pages75-76 of their FAC at paragraph179,“The use of DayCart with the Oracle server, unlocks the access of existing Oracle applications andtools (such as dual program interface plug in applications)”, which is Mr. Taitz’s ownwording in his Press Releasepertaining to Daylight and Oracle, of July 13, 2000.
See
Declaration of Philip J. Berg.
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 333-2 Filed 08/04/11 Page 3 of 25 Page ID#:7955

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->