Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
8Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Farah et. al., v Esquire magazine et. al., - Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - 8/3/2011

Farah et. al., v Esquire magazine et. al., - Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - 8/3/2011

Ratings: (0)|Views: 15,860 |Likes:
Farah et. al., v Esquire magazine et. al., - Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - 8/3/2011 --- http://www.BirtherReport.com
Farah et. al., v Esquire magazine et. al., - Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - 8/3/2011 --- http://www.BirtherReport.com

More info:

Published by: ObamaRelease YourRecords on Aug 05, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/09/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
 JOSEPH FARAH, JEROME CORSI,WORLDNETDAILY.COM, and WND BOOKS,Plaintiffs,vs.ESQUIRE MAGAZINE, INC., HEARSTCOMMUNICATIONS, INC. and MARKWARREN,Defendants.))))))))))))))
 
Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01179 (RMC)
CONSENT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPONDAND POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT
 Defendants Hearst Communications, Inc. (publisher of Esquire magazine) and Mark Warren (collectively, “Esquire”), with the consent of plaintiffs Joseph Farah, Jerome Corsi,WorldNetDaily.com and WND Books (“Plaintiffs”), move this Court for an order extending thetime by which Esquire must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the above-captioned action, in addition to the time prescribed by the Federal and Local Rules, to andincluding September 6, 2011.Pursuant to Local Rule 7(m), counsel for Esquire certifies that Esquire has conferred withPlaintiffs’ counsel and has obtained Plaintiffs’ consent to the requested relief.In making this motion, Esquire does not waive, and instead preserves, any and alldefenses which it may later raise.WHEREFORE, Esquire respectfully requests the entry of an order extending the time bywhich Esquire must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to and including September 6,2011.
Case 1:11-cv-01179-RMC Document 2 Filed 08/03/11 Page 1 of 3
 
 2Dated: August 3, 2011Respectfully submitted,DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP__Laura R. Handman_/s/_____________Laura R. Handman (D.C. Bar No. 444386)
 
laurahandman@dwt.com1919 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Suite 200Washington, D.C. 20006-3402(202) 973-4200(202) 973-4499 (fax)Attorneys for Defendants Hearst Communications,Inc. and Mark Warren
Case 1:11-cv-01179-RMC Document 2 Filed 08/03/11 Page 2 of 3

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->