maize crops) to return to much cheaper levels.Good pre-harvest weather in Canada, Europe
and, later in the new season, Australia, could
also reduce the big quality premiums currently
being asked on milling wheat.
Traders will also be keeping a keen eye the
US soyabean crop, sown on a much smaller
than expected acreage as farmers either planted more maize for the high prices or found themselves thwarted by the weather
at planting time. Any supply problems for the
world’s largest oilseed producer could seta firmer tone across the oilmeal complex,
especially at a time of disappointing Europeanrapeseed production (see below). Fortunately,
Latin America is continuing to reduce US
dominance of this market with its own larger
crops – a trend that should continue into 2012if soyabean prices stay anywhere near present
levels.
Main commodity highlightssince our last review
Wheat – a welcome drop in prices
Better than expected supplies, an early return of exports from the former SovietUnion and a crash in maize prices helpedwheat prices to drop on both sides of the
Atlantic to some of their lowest levels since
July 2010, almost 37% below the February
(2½-year) peaks. Strong maize prices had been
a key support to wheat through the feed link between the two grains. Without that help,wheat has had to acknowledge its own morebearish news. This included the Intrenational
Grains Council raising its world crop estimate
from 663m to 666m tonnes after upward
revisions for China, India, Pakistan Turkey andNorth African countries, more than offsettingan expected cut in the EU estimate. The IGC
also raised consumption, so world endingstocks will still decline slightly in 2011/12 –
though at 185m tonnes, the projected figure ishardly tight in relation to consumption needs.
The adequacy or otherwise of quality
supplies remains a key question for the wheat
market going forward after last year’s wetweather downgraded so much milling tofeed in North America, Australia and parts
of Europe. At this stage, it is too early to make
an assessment of any likely rebound – North
American spring crops are hardly sown,
Australia has just began planting and Europeanharvests are still some weeks away. Weather in the next few weeks and months will gradually clarify this picture. In the meantime, the omens
are mixed
Good quality – and a bit more tonnage than the pessimists feared – from the US
hard red winter crop has seen this important
breadwheat taking a larger role, both in the
US – where it has been replacing some of the market share held by tighter and moreexpensive hard spring wheats – and on
since planting time, the US also seems to beemerging with a better than expected crop
of this principal export grade, well down in terms of yields and tonnage but with somegood quality. However, both the US andCanada have had major problems with wet
weather holding up and downsizing their spring
wheat plantings from earlier targets. Withcrops still developing late in both countries,a needed rebound in quality milling wheatsupplies from this region may already have
been compromised – although it should notbe written off just yet. If Canada gets enoughsunshine from now through to harvest’s end,
it may yet end up with a higher proportionof milling quality wheat from a smaller than
expected total crop, rather than the excess
supplies of feed wheat that resulted from last
year’s wet weather.If the North American spring wheat crops
do fall short, the onus will fall more heavily on the other big quality supplier Australia.
Planting here has so far been going reasonably
well. Some dryness issues linger in the West
but if the eastern states avoid last year’shighly unusual harvest washouts, we could
see a complete reversal of that result (whenAustralia saw its worst milling crop for many years).Feed consumers praying for an end to thepast season’s endless litany of crop weather
problems must have wrung their hands during
May and much of June when incessant rains
threatened to stop US farmers planting
enough maize to keep up with demand (let
alone to start making up for last year’s deficits
and stock draw-downs). They needn’t have
worried, it seems, as the USDA’s latest survey shows the second highest acreage since 1944.
This came as quite a shock for the US maize
market, which had risen to record highs in June
after the USDA estimated lower plantings.
With good weather recently, maize yield
potential is rising and some analysts think the
crop could be large enough to start loosening
up carryover stocks (recently projected at
their tightest level for many years).
The USDA also ‘found’ an extra7.6m tonnes from last year’s crop
in its June 1 quarterly stocks survey
- which may mean the crop wasunder-rated or that feed/ethanol
demand has been over-rated.This combination of higher than
expected acreage and stocks caused
a massive slide in Chicago maize
prices in the first week of July- but
it wasn’t only ‘fundamentals’ that
drove prices down. Much of the decline was
down to a hemorrhage of support for futures
from speculative funds across commodities,especially ‘overbought’ markets like maize,
as investors become increasingly spooked by ideas that the global economic recovery was
stalling. There has also been a lot of discussion
in the grain trade and in the broader financial
community about record high commodity
prices – for grains, oil and metals - starting todestroy demand.
It is too early to judge how this phenomenon
will pan out. So called macro-economic
markets are notoriously fickle, rarely behavingwith consistency these days as fund managers
and currency dealers and their offshoots try to second guess the way ahead in unchartedwaters. There is also a school of thought that
some funds may actually be dumping their
commodity assets to help drive prices down,so they can buy them back at much cheaper
prices and so own both the good and the
profit (from the earlier price rises). No-one
knows how this story will end
because financial markets are beingdriven by ‘sentiment’ – perceptions,scare stories and hopes rather than
facts. As we go to press, fears of
another meltdown in confidence like the Lehman bank collapse of 2008 – focus on a potential Eurozone or USdebt defaults or a Chinese industrial
slowdown. Any of these could bea mega-restraint on cereal pricesalthough the potentially seismiceffects of more macro-economic
instability would hardly be welcomedby any industry, including the milling, feed and
livestock sectors.
Macro-economic meltdowns aside,speculative funds need fundamentals to go
their way before jumping on, or off, a marketbandwagon. In this respect all eyes in coming
weeks will be on the weather in the USA.High maize yields could pitch this market
into modest surplus, preventing prices from
returning to the highs and maybe allowing
them (depending on European and S American
Grain
&
feed miinG echnooG44 | July - august 2011