S
ite FAQ (Archive Jan 23, 2010)
What is this site?
It’s my personal website containing articles on various fringe topics. These topics include aliens, metaphysics, thematrix control system, conspiracy, and alternative science.
Where do you get your info?
Most of it comes from personal experience, insight, pondering, and applying critical thinking skills. Outer sources of information like books, websites, and articles serve as inspiration helping me retrieve knowledge from within myself.Some material comes from personal discussion and correspondence with friends.Regarding published sources, here are my primary influences, my major points of resonance:1) Law of One (Ra material) – books I/II/III2) The Cassiopaean Transcripts3) Bringers of the Dawn – Barbara Marciniak 4) Gnosis, volumes I/II/III – Boris Mouravieff 5) The Toltec Teaching Series – Theun MaresI recommend these sources to anyone who wants a thorough education in higher knowledge.Here is a longer answer:I get my research mostly from personal experience and observation, logical deduction and critical thinking,insight, and intuition – in that order. Half of the rest comes from books, textbooks, articles, websites,documentaries. And the remaining comes from anecdotes, observations, and insights relayed by others. Soin correlating this data pool and weighing the credibility of each, checking for possible errors, eliminatinginconsistencies, finding holes and modifying the theory accordingly, what I basically am trying to do ismake the best fit curve to the data, that which is contradicted by none of the data, the theory that explains itmost elegantly and allows for predictions that can be verified or insights that can be checked againstfurther study.It’s a more flexible form of the scientific method – I make my observations, form a hypothesis as to whatcould be going on, then over time that hypothesis is tested and I form a conclusion as to how to make animproved hypothesis. Traditional science does similar, except nowadays (and for quite some time) it throwsout observations that don’t fit theory instead of modifying theory to fit the data, you know the whole “if Ican’t measure it then it can’t exist” mentality which is like saying “my ruler is only a foot long, thereforethat tree over there can only be a foot tall because I can’t measure the rest” – humorous exaggeration but you get my drift. The problem with certain skeptics is that their rationalizations are sometimes moreludicrous than the very thing they are trying to discount, which is due to a stubborn bias that subjectively keeps raising the bar for what constitutes sufficient proof so that none is sufficient to prove their bias faulty. What’s worst is when, instead of testing a hypothesis, they ridicule the hypothesis as impossible andcontrary to the status quo, and therefore refuse to even test or examine it. That is contrary to the scientificmethod.Regarding proof, there is personal proof and inner knowing that is not universal “hard” proof but definitely enough to convince the one it happens to. Take lucid dreaming for instance. Can I prove to you and the
world that I have lucid dreams? No, it’s an internal phenomenon. A scientist is trained to keep himself outof the experiment, therefore he is not allowed to lucid dream himself to get the proof, rather he can merely measure and observe someone who claims to be. In that case, he will never get the proof he needs.The same goes for synchronicity, shaping your thoughts and feelings to shape what experiences you attract,etc… where proof can only be found through personal experience. I have enough experience in these mattersto be convinced that this stuff is real. And the anecdotes of others I consider plausible if they are trustworthy individuals of sound mind and I cannot find probable reason for their being mistaken. Maybe the theory is wrong, but the observations upon which they are based are real. And the observations themselves arecounter-examples to what Academia considers possible, therefore I have personal proof that there is moreto reality than the secular authorities admit. As for my education, I did four years of undergraduate physics and electrical engineering. Regarding theidea of thoughts and emotions projecting outside us and directly shaping the probability distribution of immediate probable futures, that gets into the more exotic aspects of quantum physics and electrodynamicsnot discussed in textbooks but supported by a larger collection of indirect evidence. The works of physicistDavid Bohm and Rupert Sheldrake come to mind here. In court of law, indirect evidence can settle cases if there is enough of it despite no single piece being hard proof. Same here, if all that’s considered is what youhave seen with your own eyes or published in some textbook, your world view will be limited to the size of amatchbox. Critical thinking helps stitch things together, but the energy and time required to do a good jobdiscourages people who prefer structuring their beliefs on what is convenient rather than what is true.
How do you know you’re not spreading disinformation?
The best I can do is act on my intuition and logic, keeping what rings true and is logically sound until something bettercomes along. Rather than look for what’s right with an idea, I focus on what’s wrong with it because disinformation is alot of truth with a little bit of lies and looking for the lies is therefore the proper procedure to follow. Sure, it’s not a failsafemethod, but I correct mistakes as soon as they reveal themselves.
Some articles contradict each other, what gives?
Older articles are less accurate than new ones, and so they may contradict the new ones. I’m working on gettingeverything up to date and consistent.
Why should I believe anything you say?
It’s not a matter of believing, but of discerning for yourself what’s true. The articles on this site are not to be memorizedmechanically, but rather used as a collection of ideas to inspire independent thinking and discovery. As far as material onthis site goes, accept only what rings true, what you haven’t thought of yet, and what correlates with your own observations.This site is like a buffet, not a spoon feeding.
What’s with the name “Montalk”?
My real name is Tom. “Montalk” is an online handle, a play upon the word “Montauk”. I have no connections with theMontauk Project, and chose the name only because it was a tongue-in-cheek way of indicating the conspiracy angle of thissite. It was also one of the few names left on hotmail that hadn’t been taken when I signed up for an email account.
K
ey Concepts
4/25/2004 – This is a short overview of ideas presented at montalk.net.Deeper overviews of specific subjects can be found as intros to each section of the site.
God
source of all creationprojects two aspects of itself: pure individuated consciousness, and matter/energy infuses matter/energy with fragments of its own consciousnessinfinite intelligence exploring its infinite potential through an infinite variety of finite fragmentsallows individuated fragments to expand via learning until they unite with the wholedoes not diminish in size when a fragment is created…the process is holographic replicationalso called Creator, Source, the All
Soul and Spirit
aggregates of conscious energy, holographic fragments of Godsoul is “lifespark”; characterized by awareness and consciousnessspirit is “Godspark”; characterized by self-awareness and individualized consciousnessmineral, plant, animal, and human souls differ in complexity and level of individuality whereas minerals, plants, and animals are growing their souls, humans are developing their spiritin higher planes of reality, beings may exist without a physical body while occupying a physical body, genetics tend to match spirit/soul nature — if spirit or soul is presentlarge mismatches in genetics and soul frequency result in failure to incarnate properly slight mismatches cause gradual mutations in one to accommodate the other; genetics change with soul growthand vice versathe developed human individual is composed of physical body, soul (etheric and astral body) and spirit (volitionaland mental body)
Evolution
physical evolution is due to natural selection, random mutation, conscious selection, and conscious mutationhuman evolution is mostly artificial; either DNA mutates to conform to alien soul frequency, or else DNA is
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
Recommended
More From This User
Notes
Load more
