In March 2011, the Arkansas News reported that “Crawford’s district is one of the top recipients of USDA direct and counter cyclical payments in the nation, according to figures provided by theEnvironmental Working Group. In 2009, the 1st District received $285.7 million in USDA subsidies, or about 57 percent of Arkansas’s $502 million total. Rice and soybean subsidies accounted for more than$360 million.”
Crawford Against Slash and Burn Appropriations Cutting Ag Subsidies
In June 2011, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reported that the Arkansas delegation was at odds over legislation “that would make severe cuts in federal assistance for American farmers.”Crawford “decried what he called the ‘slash and burn’ approach taken by House appropriators” and “saidthat decisions on how to shape farm policy would be best left up to that panel, which would have taken amore ‘fair and equitable approach.’”According to the Democrat-Gazette, “One approach the appropriations committee took to cut spendingwas to reduce the adjusted-gross-income limit for a farmer who receives a direct federal crop payment.Currently, the income limit is $750,000 ($1.5 million for couples) for farming income and $500,000 inoff-farm income.”The Democrat Gazette concluded by summarizing that “In total, the committee approved a budget of $125.5 billion for all agriculture programs, which include crop subsidy, loan and insurance programs,rural development, food safety, child nutrition programs, and food stamps. That's a 13.4 percent decreasein funding compared with the current fiscal year. The legislation would cut the budget for programsdealing directly with farmers, including crop payments, insurance and conservation, by 15 percentcompared with the current fiscal year, and 26 percent compared with the program's fiscal-2010 funding.”
[Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, 06/05/2011]
Supported Agriculture Appropriations Bill
In June 2011, Crawford voted in favor of the agriculture appropriations bill although he recognized that itwas in no way perfect.According to Arkansas News, he said that it still “maintains the farm safety-net that ensures a strong,stable and safe food supply. The bill also eliminates burdensome and unneeded regulations.”
Wanted to find “Pragmatic” Approach to Cutting Agriculture Subsidies
In June 2011, Crawford said the Agriculture’s “committee’s challenge will be to find the ‘pragmatic’approach to cutting subsidies.”According to Politico, Crawford said that “There will be some cuts. How much are those cuts, what willthey look like, and how do we do it as responsibly as possible without creating a real problem for our foodchain? That’s the approach we’re going to take. We have to implement these cuts, but in a responsibleway.”