(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security,Vol. 9, No. 7, July 2011
Recovery function of Components of Additive Modelof Biometric System Reliability in UML
Zoran Ćosić
(Author)
director Statheros d.o.o.Kaštel Stari, Croatiazoran.cosic@statheros.hr
Jasmin Ćosić
(Author)
IT Section of Police AdministrationMinistry of Interior of Una-sana cantonBihać, Bosnia and Hercegovina jacosic@gmail.com
Miroslav Bača
(Author)
professor Faculty of Organisational and Informational scienceVaraždin, Croatiamiroslav.baca@foi.hr
Abstract-
Approaches The development of biometric systems isundoubtedly on the rise in the number and the application areas.Modelling of system reliability and system data analysis afterfailure and the time of re-establishing the operating regime is of crucial importance for users of the system and also for producersof certain components. This paper gives an overview of themathematical model of biometric system function recovery and itsapplication through the UML model.
Keywords- Additive model, Biometric system, reliability,
recovery function, UML, component,
I.
I
NTRODUCTION
Many models of reliability of biometric systems are applicableonly to specific parts or components of that same system. For more complex considerations must be taken into accountmodels based on Markov processes that consider the reliabilityof the system as a whole, which includes components of thesystem. In this paper the approach to restoring the functions of a biometric system that had failure at some of its components iselaborated. The basic model is an additive model whichassumes a serial dependence between the components [1] (Xie& Wohlin).UML is also becoming standard in the process of systemdesign so the manufacture of component systems greatly benefits from the UML view. The authors introduce theconcept of UML modelling in the process of restoring functionanalysis of biometric systems. The paper defines the conceptualclass diagram in UML, which provides a framework for analyzing the function recovery of biometric systems.II.
A
DDITIVE RELIABILITY MODEL
Reliability [2] as the probability [2] (number between 0 and 1or 0% and 100%) can be represented as a ratio between thenumber of successful tasks and the total number of tasks in thetime specified for the operation of the system:
1
()()()
nt Rt nt
(1)where :
()
Rt
- assessment of reliability,
1
()
nt
- number of successful assignments in time t,
()
nt
- total number of tasks performed in time t,t - time specified for the operation of thesystem.The value
()
Rt
represents the estimated reliability due to thefact that the number of tasks n(t) is final. Therefore, the actualreliability R(t) is obtained when the number of tasks n(t) tendsto infinity.
()
()limRt
nt
Rt
(2)R ( t ) = 1 – F ( t ) = P ( T > t ) (3)Where the R ( t ) 1indicates the reliability function. Thus F ( t )can be called non reliability function. Approximate form of thefunction F ( t ), is shown in Figure 1. It is a continuous andmonotonically increasing function:F ( 0 ) = 0F ( t ) →1, when t → ∞Density failure function is marked with F( t ), and from probability theory we know that:
1
R ( t ) is function of reliability
1http://sites.google.com/site/ijcsis/ISSN 1947-5500
(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security,Vol. 9, No. 7, July 2011
()()
dFt ft dt
(4)where F(t) is probability distribution function.Failure intensity [3], [4], λ ( t ) represents the density of conditional probability of failure at time t provided that untilthat moment there was no failure.
)()()(
t Rt f t
(5)Or according to the model of Xie and Wohlin:
0,)()(
t dt t d t
(6)where µ(t) is mean value of the expected system failure.It is also assumed that the intensity of the failure of the entiresystem is the sum of the intensity of failures of its components:(7)So it follows that the expectations of failure of the system are(6):(8)III.
BIOMETRIC SYSTEM RECOVERY FUNCTION
Term recovery consider biometric system as a system that ismaintained after a long period of use or recovered after failure of particular components. Biometric system components, after thefailure, are maintained or exchanged and then continue to be part of the system. When considering the reliability problems of generic biometric system along with a random event that includes theappearance of failure within the system, it is necessary to consider other random event and that is recovery the system after failure.To this event corresponds a new random variable
that indicatesthe time of recovery. As a characteristic of random variable
indicators similar to those being considered for the analysis of timewithout failure are used.
A.
Distribution recovery function, refresh frequency
is a random variable [3], [4] which marks the time of recoveryof the components in failure, then the probability of recovery is as afunction of time:
P
(
<
)()
1
t F t
(9)
F
1
(t) probability distribution function of random variable
.The probability of non-recovery G(t) is defined as:
P t G
)(
(
> t) =
)(1
1
t F
(10)
Refresh frequency
)(
1
t F
is the probability density function of random variable
:
dt t dGdt t dF t f
)()()(
11
(11)From here it follows that:
)(
1
t F
dt t f
t
)(
01
(12)
dt t f t G
t
)(1)(
01
(13)
B.
Intensity of recovery function
)(
t
is the conditional probability density function2 of completionof recovery of components (repair) within time t, provided thatrecovery is not completed until the moment t.Intensity recovery function is conditional probability densityfunction of the end of the recovery in time t, provided that recoveryis not complete until that moment t, we have:
11
()()()()()()()
Ftft Gt t GtGtGt
(14)
00
()()()
tt
dGt tdt Gt
(15)
00
ln()()
t t
Gttdt
(16)
()0
()
t tdt
Gte
(17)
0
()1
F(t)= 1- e
t
tdt
(18)
2http://sites.google.com/site/ijcsis/ISSN 1947-5500
(IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security,Vol. 9, No. 7, July 2011
C.
Time recovery functiona.
Mean recovery time
Mean time of recovery
M
(
) is the mathematical expectation of random variable
whose probability density function is
)(
1
t f
,i.e.
M
(
)
dt t tf
)(
01
(19)
M
(
)
dt t G
0
)(
(20)
b.
Recovery time variance
Recovery time variance
20
is characterized by deviation of duration of recovery
from his mean recovery time
.
20
2002
)()(2)(
dt t Gdt t tG E E V
(21)
c.
Availability of system after recovery time
Probability [5], that the system after time t will be available for functioning is the expression (10).Where intensity recovery function µ can be defined as
:
(22)
MTTR –mean time to repair The process of transition from the state of failure to the state of availability can be represented as in Figure 1:
Figure 1
Condition 1 represents a functional system and condition 2represents a system that has been repaired after a failure.The transition of system from condition 1 to 2 is representedwith failure intensity function λ, the transition from condition 2to condition 1 is defined with recovery intensity function µ.IV.
R
ECOVERY FUNCTION OF BIOMETRIC SYSTEM IN UML
A.
Generalized biometric system
Generalized biometric system model[7], [8], [9] is a schematic viewof Wyman biometric system model that depicts serial dependenceof a system components and can be summarized, in this exploitation period of time, as shown on Figure 2.Figure 2The system shown in Figure 2 works in time t0 without failure.After the failure the system is recovered in time t1, after recoveryoccurs time period of re-operation t2.Parameter which defines the conditions created by failure isintensity of failure of particular component .The intensity of the component failure can be expressed as:
11
EL
nn
(23)
Where is:
n- number of correct parts of the confidence interval
(1)0,75
- lower limit of confidence for the mean time between failures.Recovery time of the system is the function of the recoveryintensity as described by the expression (22).
B.
The conceptual class-diagram model of systemrecovery
During the study [8] of the problem of reliability of generic biometric system, object-relational approach of description of the problem provides easier and clearer description of the sequenceanalysis of events within the system during the verification of failure.Figure 3 shows the diagram of classes of the recovery of biometricsystem model:
3http://sites.google.com/site/ijcsis/ISSN 1947-5500
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
Recovery function of Components of Additive Model of Biometric System Reliability in UML
Approaches The development of biometric systems is undoubtedly on the rise in the number and the application areas. Modelling of system reliability and system data analysis after failure and the time of re-establishing the operating regime…
(More)
202
Reads
0
Readcasts
0
Embed Views
Recommended
More From This User
Notes
Load more
