Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
3:10-cv-00257 #151

3:10-cv-00257 #151

Ratings: (0)|Views: 11|Likes:
Published by Equality Case Files
Doc #151
Doc #151

More info:

Published by: Equality Case Files on Aug 17, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/23/2012

pdf

text

original

 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728MICHAEL F. HERTZDeputy Assistant Attorney GeneralMELINDA HAAGUnited States AttorneyARTHUR R. GOLDBERGAssistant Branch Director CHRISTOPHER R. HALLTrial AttorneyUnited States Department of JusticeCivil Division, Federal Programs BranchP.O. Box 883Washington, D.C. 20044Telephone: (202) 514-4778Facsimile: (202) 616-8470Email:Christopher.Hall@usdoj.govAttorneys for DefendantsUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIASAN FRANCISCO DIVISIONKAREN GOLINSKIPlaintiff,v.THE UNITED STATES OFFICE OFPERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al.Defendants. ____________________________________ )))))))))))) No. C 3:10-00257-JSW
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TOPLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Defendants United States Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) and John Berry,Director of OPM, submit this response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF Nos.142-44.In response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as to the First Claim for Relief set forth in her Second Amended Complaint, which challenges the constitutionality of Section 3of the Defense of Marriage Act, 1 U.S.C. § 7 (“DOMA”), Defendants rely upon, and incorporate by reference herein, their Brief in Opposition to Motions to Dismiss, filed July 1, 2011, ECF No.145. Attachment A.
 Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment 3:10cv257-JSW 
Case3:10-cv-00257-JSW Document151 Filed07/15/11 Page1 of 2
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728In response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as to the Second Claim for Relief set forth in her Second Amended Complaint, which appears to challenge Defendants’interpretation of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Act, 5 U.S.C. § 8901
et seq.
, Defendantsrely upon, and incorporate by reference herein: (1) Defendants’ Memorandum in Support of their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 118-1; and (2) Defendants’Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, ECF No.147. Attachments B, C.Dated: July 15, 2011Respectfully Submitted,MICHAEL F. HERTZDeputy Assistant Attorney GeneralMELINDA HAAGUnited States AttorneyARTHUR R. GOLDBERGAssistant Branch Director  
 /s/ Christopher R. Hall 
 
CHRISTOPHER R. HALLD.C. Bar No. 468827Trial AttorneyU.S. Department of JusticeCivil Division, Federal Programs BranchP.O. Box 883Washington, D.C. 20044(202) 514-4778 (telephone)(202) 616-8470 (fax)Attorneys for Defendants
 Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment 3:10cv257-JSW 
2
Case3:10-cv-00257-JSW Document151 Filed07/15/11 Page2 of 2
 
ATTACHMENT A
Case3:10-cv-00257-JSW Document151-1 Filed07/15/11 Page1 of 32

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->