/  8
 
The Universal Quantum Fluid
Fran De Aquino
Maranhao State University, Physics Department, S.Luis/MA, Brazil.Copyright
©
2011 by Fran De Aquino. All Rights Reserved
The quantization of gravity showed that the matter is also quantized, and that there is an
elementary quantum of matter 
, indivisible, whose mass is
kg
73
109.3
×±
. This means that any body is formed by
a whole number 
of theseparticles (quantization). It is shown here that these elementary
quanta
of matter should fill all the space in theUniverse forming a
Quantum Fluid continuous and stationary
. In addition, it is also explained why theMichelson-Morley experiment was not able to detect this Universal Quantum Fluid.
Key words:
Quantum Fluids, Quantum Gravity, Quantum CosmologyPACS: 67.10.-j; 04.60.-m; 98.80.Qc
1. Introduction
 Until the end of the century XX,several attempts to quantize gravity weremade. However, all of them resulted fruitless
[1,2]
. In the beginning of this century, it wasclearly noticed that there was somethingunsatisfactory about the whole notion of quantization and that the quantizationprocess had many ambiguities. Then, a newapproach has been proposed starting f rom thegeneralization of the
action function
*
. Theresult has been the derivation of a theoreticalbackground, which finally led to the so-sought quantization of gravity and of 
matter 
 
[3]
. The quantization of matter shows thatthere is an
elementary quantum of matter 
 whose mass is
kg
73
109.3
×±
. This means thatthere are no particles in the Universe withmasses smaller than this, and that any body isformed by
a whole number 
of these particles.Here, it will be shown that these elementary
quanta
of matter should fill all the space inthe Universe, forming a
quantum fluid continuous and stationary
.
In addition, it isalso explained why the Michelson-Morleyexperiment
found no evidence of the existenceof the universal fluid
 [4]
. A modified
Michelson-Morley experiment is proposed inorder to observe the
displacement of theinterference bands.
2. The Universal Quantum Fluid
 The quantization of gravity showedthat the matter is also quantized, and that
*
The formulation of the
action
in Classical Mechanicsextends to Quantum Mechanics and has been the basisfor the development of the
Strings Theory.
 
there is an
elementary quantum of matter 
,indivisible, whose mass is
kg
73
109.3
×±
[3]
.Considering that the inertial mass of 
the
Observable Universe
is
kgG H c M 
5303
102
=
,and that its volume is
( )
3793034334
10
m H c R
==
π π 
, whereis the
 Hubble constant 
,we can conclude that the
number of these particles in the Observable Universe
is
1180
1075.1
×=
s H 
( )
( )
110
125min0
 particlesm M n
i
=
By dividing this number by , we get
( )
2 / 10
346
m particlesn
Obviously, the dimensions of the
elementary quantum of matter 
depend on itsstate of compression. In free space, forexample, its volume is
n
.Consequently, its “radius” is
mn R
153
10
.If particles with diameter
 N 
φ 
 
 fill all
 
space
of then . Thus, if then the number of particles, withthis diameter, necessary to fill all is. Since the number of 
3
1
m
1
3
=
φ 
 N m
15
10
φ 
3
1
m
 particles N 
45
10
elementary quantum of matter 
in theUniverse is
346
 / 10
m particlesn
we canconclude that these particles
 fill all space
inthe Universe, forming a
Quantum Fluid continuous and stationary
, the density of which is
( )
( )
3 / 10
327min0
mkgmn
iCUF 
=
 ρ 
Note that this density is smaller than the
 
2
density of the
 Intergalactic Medium
( )
326
 / 10
mkg
 IGM 
 ρ 
.
 
The density of the Universal QuantumFluid is clearly
not uniform
along theUniverse, since it can be stronglycompressed in several regions (galaxies,stars, blackholes, planets, etc). At the normalstate (free space), the mentioned fluid is
invisible
. However, at
supercompressed 
 state, it can become
visible
 
by giving origin
 to the
known matter 
, since matter, as we haveseen, is
quantized 
and consequently, formedby an
integer number 
of elementary quantumof matter with mass . Inside theproton, for example, there are
(
min0
i
m
)
( )
45min0
10
=
i p p
mmn
 
elementary quanta of matter 
 at supercompressed state, with volume
 p proton
n
and “radius”
mn R
 p p
303
10
.Therefore, the solidification of thematter is just a
transitory state
of thisUniversal Quantum Fluid, which can turnback into the primitive state when thecohesion conditions disappear.Due to the cohesion state of the
elementary quanta of matter 
in the
UniversalQuantum Fluid 
, any amount of 
linear 
 
momentum
transferred to any elementary
quantum
of matter propagates totally to theneighboring and so on, in such way that,during the propagation of the
momentum
, theelementary
quanta
of matter do not move, inthe same way as the intermediate spheres inNewton’s
 pendulum
(the well-known devicethat demonstrates conservation of 
momentum
 and energy)
[5,6]
. Thus, whether it is aphoton that transfers its
momentum
to theelementary
quanta
of matter, then themomentum variation due to the incidentphoton is
λ 
h p
=Δ
, where
λ 
is itswavelength. As we have seen, the diameterof the elementary
quantum
of matter is. According to the
UncertaintyPrinciple
the variation can only bedetected if. In order to satisfy thiscondition we must have .This means that
momentum
variations, in theelementary
quanta
of matter,
caused by photons with wavelength cannot be detected.
That is to say that thepropagation of these photons through theUniversal Quantum Fluid is equivalent to itspropagation in the
 free space
. In practice, itworks as if 
there was not the UniversalQuantum Fluid 
. This conclusion is highlyimportant, because it can easily explain whyin the historical Michelson-Morleyexperiment there was no displacement of theinterference bands namely because thewavelength of the light used in the
Michelson-Morley experiment was
fact that ledMichelson to conclude that the hypothesis of a stationary ether was incorrect. Posteriorly,several experiments
[
m x
15
10
Δ
 p
Δ
h
ΔΔ
 x p
m x
14
102
Δ
π λ 
m
14
10
>
λ 
m
7
105
×=
λ 
7-13]
have been carriedout in order to check the Michelson-Morleyexperiment, but the results basically were thesame obtained by Michelson.Thus, actually there was nodisplacement of the interference bands in theMichelson-Morley experiment because thewavelength used in the experimentwas, which is a value clearlymuch greater than , and therefore,does not satisfy the conditionderived from the UncertaintyPrinciple. The substitution of light used inthe Michelson-Morley experiment byradiation with is clearlyimpracticable. However, the Michelson-Morley experiment can be partially modifiedso as to yield the displacement of theinterference bands. The idea is based on thegeneralized expression for the
momentum
obtained recently
[
m
7
105
×=
λ 
m
14
10
m x
14
102
Δ
π λ 
m
14
10
λ 
3]
, which is given by
( )
4
 M  p
g
=
where
22
1
cm M 
gg
=
is the relativisticgravitational mass of the particle and
itsvelocity; the
general expressionof the correlation between the gravitationaland inertial mass
;
0
ig
mm
χ 
=
 χ 
is the correlationfactor
[3]
.Thus, we can write
( )
511
22022
cmcm
ig
=
 χ 
 Therefore, we get
 
3
( )
6
ig
 M  M 
χ 
=
The Relativistic Mechanics tells us that
( )
7
2
cUV  p
=
where is the
total
energy of the particle.This expression is valid for
any
velocity
of the particle, including
c
=
.By comparing Eq. (7) with Eq. (4) weobtain
( )
8
2
c M 
g
=
It is a well-known experimental fact that
( )
9
2
hf c M 
i
=
Therefore, by substituting Eq. (9) and Eq. (6)into Eq. (4), gives
( )
10
λ  χ 
hc p
=
Note that this expression is valid for
any
 velocity of the particle. In the particularcase of , it reduces to
c
=
( )
11
λ  χ 
h p
=
By comparing Eq. (10) with Eq. (7), weobtain
( )
12
hf 
χ 
=
Note that only for
1
=
 χ 
Eq. (11) and Eq.(12) are reduced to the well=knownexpressions of DeBroglie
( )
λ 
hq
=
andEinstein
( )
.
hf 
=
Equations (10) and (12) show, forexample, that
any
real particle (materialparticles, real photons, etc) that penetrates aregion (with density
 ρ 
, conductivity
σ 
andrelative permeability
μ 
), where there is anelectromagnetic field
(
, will have its
momentum
)
 B E 
,
 p
and its energy
 
reduced bythe factor
χ 
, where
 χ 
is given by
[3]:
( )
13110758.1121 1121
4432327200
 ⎠ ⎞⎝ ⎛ ×+= = ⎠ ⎞⎝ ⎛ Δ+==
rmsiig
 Bc f cm pmm
 ρ σ μ  χ 
where is the
rms
value of the magneticfield
rms
 B
 B
.The remaining amount of 
momentum
 and
energy
, respectively given by
( )
λ  χ 
hc
 ⎠ ⎞⎝ ⎛ 
1
and
( )
hf 
 χ 
1
, are
transferred to
the
imaginar  y
particleassociated to the
real
particle
(materialparticles or real photons) that penetrated thementioned region.It was previously shown that, when the
gravitational mass
of a particle is reduced toa range between
i
 M 
1590
.
+
to ,i.e., when
i
 M 
1590
.
159.0
<
 χ 
, it becomes
imaginary
[3]
,
i.e., the gravitational and theinertial masses of the particle becomes
imaginary
. Consequently, the particle disappearsfrom our ordinary space-time. It goes to theImaginary Universe. On the other hand, when thegravitational mass of the particle becomes greaterthan
i
 M 
1590
.
+
, or less than , i.e.,when
i
 M 
1590
.
159.0
>
 χ 
, the particle return to ourUniverse.Figure 1 (a) clarifies the phenomenon of reduction of the
momentum
for159.0
>
 χ 
, andFigure 1 (b) shows the effect in the case of 159.0
<
 χ 
. In this case, the particles becomeimaginary and, consequently, they go to the
 imaginary space-time
when they penetrate theelectric field
 E 
. However, the electric field
 E 
 stays in the
real
space-time. Consequently, theparticles return immediately to the real space-time in order to return soon after to the
imaginary
 space-time, due to the action of the electricfield
 E 
. Since the particles are moving at adirection, they
appear 
and
disappear 
while theyare crossing the region, up to collide with theplate (See Fig.1) with a
momentum,
λ  χ 
hc p
m
 ⎠ ⎞⎝ ⎛ =
, in the case of a
material particle
, and
λ  χ 
h p
=
in the case of a
 photon
.
If this photon transfers its
momentum
 
to elementary
quanta
of 
matter
( )
m x
15
10
Δ
,then the momentum variation due to theincident photon is
λ  χ 
h p
=Δ
. According tothe
Uncertainty Principle
the variation
 p
Δ
 can only be detected if, i.e., i
h
ΔΔ
 x p
( )
142
 x
Δ
χ π λ 
We conclude, then, that the
interaction
 between the light used in the Michelson-
 
 
As previously shown, there are
imaginary particles
 associated to each
real particle
[3]
.

Share & Embed

More from this user

Recent Readcasters

Add a Comment

Characters: ...