R. VAN BRAXTON, et AL, Defendants, hereby moves Development 2011, and (hereinafter rtBraxton) in contempt of this court for violating an order of this court filed herein on may 25, 2011. On may 2, 2011, ECDC served a response to and produced certain documents which certified were responsive 3. Specifically fails to affirmatively exist or that e&Allen, P.A. )RNPSYS AT LAW to the two Subpoenas
R. VAN BRAXTON, et AL, Defendants, hereby moves Development 2011, and (hereinafter rtBraxton) in contempt of this court for violating an order of this court filed herein on may 25, 2011. On may 2, 2011, ECDC served a response to and produced certain documents which certified were responsive 3. Specifically fails to affirmatively exist or that e&Allen, P.A. )RNPSYS AT LAW to the two Subpoenas
R. VAN BRAXTON, et AL, Defendants, hereby moves Development 2011, and (hereinafter rtBraxton) in contempt of this court for violating an order of this court filed herein on may 25, 2011. On may 2, 2011, ECDC served a response to and produced certain documents which certified were responsive 3. Specifically fails to affirmatively exist or that e&Allen, P.A. )RNPSYS AT LAW to the two Subpoenas