High Quality
Open the downloaded document, and select print from the file menu (PDF reader required).
M
Wednesday,February24,1988,Milwaukee,Wis.
ol.72No.
70
Editorial:
\
jew~()int_,__,.,
Walkerunfit
,
Revision
i
I
I
I
j
\
,
:------
.-~,'IdmightnotwantScott'seffective.leader-
neofthehardestthingsintheworthis'tomakeapublicretraction.Butthereshipanddedication.toserving.e
students"somemayattributethisretimes,thankfullytheexceptionr.ather"t"t
retractiontoadesireonourpart
0
gethantherule,whennewfactsrequirere-back"atWalker.Thisisuntrue,butitisa
evaluationofa.sincereandcarefully
thought-outposition.Wefindourselvesperceptionwehavetorisk.'.'.'
WeexaminedthebrochureWithoutItsinpreciselythissituation.referencetothe
editonat
boardandask-Tuesday,weannouncedourbelief
that"eachofthetwo(ASMU)presiden-edourselves,"Ifthiswas'partofthe
tialcandidatesofferssignificantim-standardWalkercampaignliterature
·provementsoverthisyear'sadrninistra-whenweheldtheinterviews,wouldwe,
tion"andthat"eithercandidatewouldhavewrittentheendorsement
.servethestudentbodywell."Wenodifferently?"
'I
longerbelievethistobethecase.Inlight
Everyone
ofushadtoansweryes.WeofdevelopmentssinceSundayeveningcouldnothavewritten,ingoodcons-
wenowconcludethatJohnQuigleycience,thatWalkerwouldbeagood
II
aloneshowsthequalificationswedeempresident.Inouropinion,noonewho
11
necessarytosuccesstuileadershipofrespondstooppositionby_distorting(if
ASMU.,notas.Sassinating)-thecharacterofhis
BothScottWalkerandJohnQuigleyopponentandmakingooutyaccusationspresentedthemselvesatourendorse-,'deservestobepresidentofthestudent,
ment,interviewsasabove-board'can-body.Butthis,ofcourse,issomething
didates.Theygenuinely'concerned.thestudentbodywillhavetodecide.
themselves
withthe
issues'anddeclinedWearealsodisappointedbyreportsoftosmeareachother,even,whenaskedWalkercampaignpersonnelpickingup
toelaborateontheweaknessesoftheirarmfulsofTuesday'sTribuneandthrow-Opponent'splatform.ButTuesdaymorn-ingthemaway.WearedisapPointedriot
ing,aScottWalkercampaignbrochurebecausethepaperscontainedouren-
wasdistributed.oncampus.whichdorsements,butbecauseitisaserious
?mountsto.nothingmorethanablatantshametoseehours'of'workand
mudslingingspree."thousandsOfadv'ertisingdollars
i
.Walker's::opponentischaracterized,deliberatelymade.useless;'And.mostly':
misleadingly,as':constantly'shout(ing),becauseagreat'numberofMarquette
1
aboutfightingthe"administratiori,"as.studentswere,d~privedof
a
Chanceto
!
"threateninglawsuits'·'and'as"trYOng)"seethepaper-coverage
arthe
Maya
!
toleadseveralineffectiveprotests"ofhis"Angelou'presentationandthe
I
own."Inshort,thestiJdentbodyisasked.
-r-
Marquette-Virginia'Tech'game"among
Ii
lQvjew.Qujgl~y.as:a
.»
Wjld-eyedradical.',.~otherstoriesandthefour-page
health
determinedtorousethe.students"into'supplement..
i
surroundingO'HaraHallwithstonesandWe'd
like
toinviteanyone,«howasn't
J
','"speC3,rs:·,;,His·plattormis':':'caricaturedasable'topickup'apaperTuesdaytostop
1
.,{"i~S!c"a~~~~,h'i:::~~:~;~i;~ur~
,:;;~..~~~
~~~~nelf
ff~~~
in;~~ns;~~
~I~
i
contrary"to.thetext'ofTuesday'sen-dorsements,though,remembera'revi-
porsement-:-that
;"the
,e.ditoria/:board,·sionvyasnecessary.
i
""~'~~.~r~--------~~-----'>~""~'~"~--"~~~~"~~~
i
'..'-".,'...,"--"..:,---,1
--.......".__
J.•.•
1_~C\T"\
~h,",l't
1
Add a Comment