Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What has the relationship between faith and science been during the history of the church?
Attitudes have not sufficiently perceived and recognized the legitimate autonomy of science Maintains that science and Faith are in opposition with one another There has been an indifference between them, going ahead on parallel tracks, in complete ignorance of one another
What has the relationship between faith and science been during the history of the church? It should be affirmed that the Church, faithful to its mission, can enter in dialogue with every type of science and efficiently use the scientific results to better fulfill its mission. Sent to all peoples of any place and time, the Church is not linked in an exclusive and indissoluble manner to any type of science, and neither to any scientific conquest.
There is no insoluble contradiction between faith and science, because there cannot be two kinds of truth. There is only one truth to which both faith and scientific reason refer. - CCC 159, YouCat 23
A dialogue in distinction, i.e., a dialogue that recognizes the specific characteristics of both of them. In fact, each of them: has its own methods, fields and objects of research, goals and limits should respect the other and recognize in the other its legitimate possibility of autonomous exercise according to its own principles
At the same time, both faith & reason are called to serve man and humanity, by favoring the development and integral growth of each and everyone.
It is an illusion to claim moral neutrality in scientific research and its applications. On the other hand, guiding principles can neither be deduced from simple technological efficiency nor from the usefulness accruing to some at the cost of others, nor, even worse, from prevailing ideologies.
Science and technology by their very nature require unconditional respect for fundamental moral criteria. Science and technology should be at the service of the human person, of his inalienable rights, of his true and integral good, in conformity with the plan and the will of God (CCC, n. 2294).
What does autonomy of science mean? The autonomy of science therefore ends where the upright conscience of the scientist recognizes the evilness of the method, of its results or effects.
Can there be a real contrast between the discoveries of science and the truths of the faith? Both science and Faith, though distinct, are united in truth: they converge in admitting the truths and the Truth; they find in the truth their foundation, their reason for existence and the goal of their operations.
Can there be a real contrast between the discoveries of science and the truths of the faith?
Can there be a real contrast between the discoveries of science and the truths of the faith?
Thus if methodical investigation of every branch of learning is carried out in a genuinely scientific manner and according to moral norms, it will never really be in contrast with Faith, for earthly matters and the concerns of Faith have their origin in the same God. Indeed, whoever labors to penetrate the secrets of reality with humility and perseverance, even though he is unaware of the fact, is nevertheless being led by the hand of God, who holds all things in existence, and gives them their identity (Gaudium et Spes, n. 36).
Can there be a real contrast between the discoveries of science and the truths of the faith? Both science and Faith are at the service of man, of all of man and of all that is genuinely human.
Science and Faith are ordered in view of man, from whom their origin and development stems, and by whom they promote their integral development to the benefit of all.
Science and faith find in the person the indication of their goal and the consciousness of their respective limits.
What does the anthropological and humanistic value of science consist of? It consists of the fact that science:
is performed by man; is for the good of the individual person and humanity; is for the good of the scientist as a person.
What positive contribution does science offer to society and to the church?
the rigorous fidelity to what is true in scientific investigation; collaboration with others in specialized technical groups; the sense of international solidarity; the ever present awareness of the responsibility of experts in helping and protecting men; the will to make the living conditions happier for all, especially for those who suffer due to various reason; assistance to Faith in purifying itself of wrong elements; the great contribution that science offers in raising the human family to higher concepts of the truth, of goodness, of beauty, and to a vision of things of universal value; the expression and realization of the lordship of man over creation. Science realizes Gods plan, manifested at the beginning of times, of subjecting the earth and perfecting creation; the realization of Christs great commandment to do all one can for the service of ones brothers: Every time you did these things to one of the least of my brethren, you did them to me (Mt 25: 40).
What positive contribution does science offer to society and to the church?
Christian Faith:
Exists so that we might know things that are not apparent to reason yet are real, above and beyond reason. Demands and promotes the (natural) sciences. Just as God intended faith, He also intended reason with which we can recognize the rational structures of the world. Reminds science that it is supposed to serve creation and not set itself up in place of God.
YouCat 23
Christian Faith:
places us on guard against serious risks which science can run into.
For instance: todays progress of science and technology, which on the strength of their method, cannot penetrate through the intimate reasons of things, can favor a certain phenomenism and agnosticism, when the investigation method which these sciences make use of are wrongly raised to a supreme norm of research of the total truth. On the contrary, there is the risk that man, by excessively putting his trust in todays discoveries, thinks that that is enough and fails to search for superior values (Gaudium et Spes, 36).
offers the priorities and moral principles which science should respect.
Science, in order to fulfill its task: should allow itself to be guided by the primacy: of the person over things; of ethics over technology; of the spirit over matter; of being over having and doing ; of research of the truth; of the needs of justice and peace;
Science, in order to fulfill its task: should therefore avoid following priorities which are mainly fixed:
by economic motives (indiscriminate research of economic profit at the individual and group level); by interests of political groups; by the search for personal prestige.
Not everything which is scientifically and technologically feasible is also morally acceptable; It is not proper to obtain good through evil; The end does not justify the means.
What are the moral principles that science should respect? The following should be respected: the integral good of man and humanity ; the transcendental dimension of the person and of creation; the life and the dignity of man, the quality of his life, the rights of the present and future human generations; the creation and its environment.
To discover the marvels of nature, with that attitude which is precisely of one who does not extend his hands over the world saying: it is mine, but of one in awe, who sees it held by an another, and recognizes that it is a gift from Another for himself and for all. To respect the ontological and value-based difference that exists between man and other living beings. To respect the nature of every being and of its mutual connection with other beings in a balanced and ordered system (the eco system). To promote the environment as a home and as a resource in favor of man and of all men.
To search for the true good of humanity according to the plan and the will of God, and to allow man, considered as an individual and as a member of society, to cultivate and realize his integral vocation. To carry out a service:
for the truth; for the dignity of the person and the quality of ones life; for humanity and its values; for the satisfaction of especially the primary needs of man, by always trying to overcome particularly hunger and disease.
To maintain in man the faculties of contemplation and admiration that lead to wisdom; To realize scientific progress which is true human progress. To avoid:
believing in being able to provide a solution to everything; absolutizing its method and its results; making arbitrary use of the earth, by subjecting it without reserve to ones will and exploiting the resources of creation in an inconsiderate manner; carrying out experiments on the human being without the explicit consent of the subject or of his rights, and when he runs into disproportionate or evitable risks for life or the physical and psychic integrity of the subjects.
Can someone accept the theory of evolution and still believe in the Creator?
Yes. Although it is a different kind of knowledge, faith is open to the findings and hypotheses of the sciences. - CCC 282-289, YouCat 42
Charles Darwin Origin of the Species
A Christian can accept the theory of evolution as a helpful exploratory model, provided he does not fall into the heresy of evolutionism, which views man as the random product of biological processes. - YouCat 42
Can someone accept the theory of evolution and still believe in the Creator?
EVOLUTION presupposes the existence of something that can develop. The theory of evolution says nothing about where this something came from. Furthermore, questions about the being, essence, dignity, mission, meaning, and wherefore of the world and man cannot be answered in biological terms. Just as the heresy of evolutionism oversteps a boundary on the one side, so does the heresy of creationism on the other.
Creationists naively take biblical data literally (e.g., to calculate the earths age, they cite the six days of work in Genesis 1). - YouCat 42
taking into account the role, the goals and limits of science. respecting the above mentioned moral principles, by realizing his ethical responsibility, remembering that he is a man before being a scientist.
The segmentation of knowledge with its splintered approach to truth and consequent fragmentation of meaning, keeps people today from coming to an interior unity (Fides et Ratio, n. 85)
The Christian worldview played a significant role in nurturing the development of modern science:
The Christians belief in God gave them confidence that the physical world, in all its complexity and vast extent, could be understoodAs a matter of historical fact, modern science has developed from an understanding of the world as Gods ordered Creation, with its own inherent rationality.
Roger Trigg, Does Science Need Religion? Faraday Papers, no. 2 (April 2007)
Science is the how and what realm whereas faith, metaphysics, philosophy, and religion are the why realm. Science is an observation of everything around us, but it cannot explain in the fullest philosophical and religious sense; it cannot provide meaning and purpose. Conversely, just because religion/faith can provide why, does not mean that those are the same tools that we use to describe the how, or what of our natural world.
Mathematics is the alphabet with which God wrote the world. - Galileo Galilei (1564-1642, mathematician, philosopher, & physicist)
References
Raffaello Martinelli. Science and Christian Faith: How are they reconciled?
http://www.sancarlo.pcn.net/argomenti_inglese/pagina45.htm
Karl Giberson & Francis Collins. (2011). The Language of Science and Faith: Straight Answers to Genuine Questions. InterVarsity Press, http://vialogue.wordpress.com/2011/04/01/the-language-ofscience-and-faith-notes-review/
Francis S. Collins.(2009) Can Science and Religion Co-Exist in Harmony? The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life's Faith Angle Conference on religion, politics and public life.
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1259/can-science-and-faith-be-reconciled/
Youth Catechism of the Catholic Church (YOUCAT). 2011, Ignatius Press, San Francisco Vatican Council I, Dei Filius (DF) Vatican Council II, Gaudium et spes (GS); John Paul II, Fides et ratio, 1998; Catechism of the Catholic Church, nn. 159; 2293-2294; Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, Summary of the Social Doctrine of the Church, 2004, nn. 331-363; 456-473.