Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
 http://www.essex.ac.uk/chimera/
CHIMERA WORKING PAPER NUMBER: 2006-13
CWP-2006-13-EDKM-Final-Data-Report.doc
Entangled Data: Knowledge & Community making in E(Social) Science Final Data Report
 
Chimera Working Paper Number: 2006-13
Samuelle CarlsonBen Anderson
Chimera, University of Essex, UK 
Email address of corresponding author: benander@essex.ac.ukThis report documents and interprets the diverse data collected during the ESRC eSocial ScienceSmall Grant project ‘Entangled Data: Knowledge & Community making in E (Social) Science’ (EDKM).It provides background information to the project, the aims and objectives and an overview of theresearch methods used. Based on the four case studies the report gives a detailed account of theresults, findings and implications. Sections of this report have been and will continue to bepublished as more complete and considered conference papers, workshop presentations and journalarticles.This research was supported the ESRC e-Social Science Programme funded ‘Entangled Data andKnowledge’ project, RES-149-25-1002 - http://www.essex.ac.uk/chimera/projects/edkm/
 
CHIMERA WORKING PAPER NUMBER: 2006-13
CWP-2006-13-EDKM-Final-Data-Report.doc© 2006, University of Essexhttp://www.essex.ac.uk/chimera/ Page 2 of 40
Chimera
The work reported in this paper is part of the scientific programme of Chimera, the Institute for Socio-technical Innovation and Research at the University of Essex.Chimera is a post-disciplinary institute employing social scientists, computer scientists, engineers,anthropologists, psychologists, HCI practitioners and interface designers specialising in ‘socio-technical’research and consulting. It was set up in April 2002 at Adastral Park, Suffolk as a research institute of theUniversity of Essex.Chimera carries out research which combines the social and technological sciences to:
generate insights into personal and social use of information and communication technologies,
ground technological innovation in an understanding of people,
provide analysis to support evidence-based 'information society' strategies and policies in the public andcommercial domain.We achieve this through a balanced programme of basic and applied research projects, consultancy andpublication. For more information see www.essex.ac.uk/chimera
Contacting Chimera
ChimeraInstitute of Socio-Technical Innovation and ResearchRoss Building (PP1, ROS-IP)Adastral Park,Martlesham Heath,Ipswich, Suffolk,IP5 3REUKTel: +44 (01473) 632238Fax: +44 (01473) 614936E-mail: chimera@essex.ac.ukWeb: http://www.essex.ac.uk/chimera/
Citing This Paper 
Carlson, S. and Anderson, B (2006),
Entangled Data: Knowledge & Community making in E (Social) ScienceFinal Data Report 
.
 
Chimera Working Paper 2006-13. Ipswich: Chimera, University of Essex.For an on-line version of this working paper and others in the series go to www.essex.ac.uk/chimera/© 2006, University of EssexAll rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted,in any form, or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Director, Chimera.
 
CHIMERA WORKING PAPER NUMBER: 2006-13
CWP-2006-13-EDKM-Final-Data-Report.doc© 2006, University of Essexhttp://www.essex.ac.uk/chimera/ Page 3 of 40
Table of Contents1
 
Introduction.......................................................................................................................................................4
 
2
 
Objectives..........................................................................................................................................................6
 
3
 
Fieldsites and methods...................................................................................................................................6
 
4
 
E-nabling data: likely impacts on data, methods and expertise..............................................................9
 
4.1
 
Born digital Vs multimedia legacy data......................................................................................................9
 
4.2
 
Codified abstract forms Vs tacit knowledge.............................................................................................10
 
4.3
 
Some implications of disconnecting data from people?.........................................................................12
 
5
 
Making data retrievable and comparable: technical and semantic standards....................................17
 
5.1
 
With whom?...............................................................................................................................................17
 
5.2
 
For whom?.................................................................................................................................................17
 
5.3
 
Decided by whom?....................................................................................................................................18
 
5.4
 
Different approaches to metadata............................................................................................................19
 
6
 
Communities and collaboratories: can collaborative management tools be transferred tointeractions with and amongst users?..............................................................................................................21
 
6.1
 
Relationships at the basis of e-collaborative projects.............................................................................21
 
6.2
 
Different technologies to answer different kinds/phases of collaboration.............................................24
 
6.3
 
Interactions with and amongst users.......................................................................................................27
 
7
 
The impacts of e-Science on existing structures of authority/expertise.............................................29
 
7.1
 
New forms of measurement; new forms of collective creation of knowledge?.....................................29
 
7.2
 
Increasing fragmentation..........................................................................................................................30
 
7.3
 
Technology as social agent?....................................................................................................................32
 
8
 
Conclusions....................................................................................................................................................34
 
8.1
 
E-nabling data: likely impacts on data, methods and expertise.............................................................34
 
8.2
 
Making data retrievable and comparable: technical and semantic standards......................................35
 
8.3
 
Communities and collaboratories.............................................................................................................35
 
8.4
 
The impacts of e-Science on existing structures of authority/expertise................................................36
 
8.5
 
Final comment...........................................................................................................................................36
 
9
 
Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................................37
 
10
 
References.....................................................................................................................................................38
 
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • More From This User

    Notes
    Load more