Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
11-08-25 Fwd Re Citizen’s Right to Stop Illegal Conduct by Public Official, alternatively - am i stupid?

11-08-25 Fwd Re Citizen’s Right to Stop Illegal Conduct by Public Official, alternatively - am i stupid?

Ratings: (0)|Views: 12|Likes:
Q: My sheriff is poaching... My judge is corrupt…
Is there anything I could do to stop it?
A: Not much, really...
Am I stupid?
Q: My sheriff is poaching... My judge is corrupt…
Is there anything I could do to stop it?
A: Not much, really...
Am I stupid?

More info:

Published by: Human Rights Alert, NGO on Aug 25, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Human Rights Alert 
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
-08-25 Fwd: Re: Citizen’s right to stop illegal conduct by public official
Am I stupid? 
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 03:55:50 +0300
To: lawsters@googlegroups.comFrom: joseph zernik <jz12345@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: citizen’s right to stop illegal conduct by public officialBack to the question itself: How to stop illegal conduct by a government official -Some laws, which were specifically enacted during the Reconstruction Era, following the Civil War tostop unlawful conduct by public officials are:
Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights,
42 USC 1983
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State orTerritory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the UnitedStates or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, orimmunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law,suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicialofficer for an act or omission taken in such officers judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be grantedunless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of thissection, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to bea statute of the District of Columbia.
Corresponding jurisdictional statute, 28 U.S.C. 1343
Corresponding criminal statues 18 USC 242
However, as described previously, the US courts do not observe this section. For example, in
Zernik v Connor et al 
(08-cv-01550) I duly filed under this section a complaint under 1983 against some 10California judges in the US Distinct Court, Central District of California, for conduct amounting toracketeering.In response:
The clerk of the court refused to issue summonses, and
The court went on conducting a simulated litigation under this caption, months after Irefused to oppose a motion for dismissal...For review of the true legal interpretation of the law you may read:
Page 2/2 August 25, 2011
Sword and Shield: A Practical Approach to Section 1983 Litigation
 http://www.amazon.com/Section-1983-sword-shield-violations/dp/0897071107 This law pertains to unlawful conduct relative to deprivation of rights, poaching is unlikely to beaddressed by this law.JZ
P.S. Standard Disclaimer:
1) The writer is not an attorney, and has no legal education.2) The older I get the more I realize how clueless I am! __________ Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:36:38 +0300
To: lawsters@googlegroups.comFrom: joseph zernik <jz12345@earthlink.net>
Subject: RE: Citizens' right to stop illegal conduct by judges?Here are some explanations regarding the
de facto 
law of United States:1) My understanding is that you might appeal only a valid appealable order or judgment of a US courts, not anyhand-written piece of paper written by anybody, even if that person is represented as a US judge.2) In a similar situation in the US District Court, Central District of California, the Clerk of the Court refused toissue summonses. When I petitioned the refusal to issue summonses to the 9th Circuit, the petition wasdenied, albeit, with an unsigned, unauthenticated order. The lower courts would not engage in such unlawfulconduct, unless they knew that they were fully supported by the US courts of appeals.3) In a similar situation - the simulated habeas corpus of Richard Fine - a simulated appeal was conducted bythe 9th circuit court of appeals, and then a simulated petition in the US Supreme Court.I lawfully filed evidence to the Supreme Court of the simulated nature of the proceedings in the US DistrictCourt, Central District of California and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit. Surprise, surprise, the papers were"returned" by SCOTUS court counsel Danny Bickell (neither a Deputy Clerk, nor a Justice of SCOTUS), afterbeing stamped "Received". In short, SCOTUS as well supports the practice.
4) In the US Court, Central District of California, I was even told directly by the Deputy Clerk in the IntakeDepartment - the "Pro Se Clerk". - that any paper which included evidence against California judges would bedenied filing.
5) The experience is not only mine, William Windsor experienced the same in the US District Court, DC
], andRichard Fine experience the same in the US District Court, Central District of California.6) The practice can be summarized as a
Federal Rule of Court: 
Any papers, which include valid evidence of judicial corruption are exempt from First Amendmentrights, and must be denied filing in the US Courts. [4]
I suggest that you read the links below, and update yourself regarding the
de facto 
law of the United States.
[1] 10-07-01 Complaint against US Supreme Court Counsel Danny Bickell for Alleged Public Corruption andDeprivation of Rightshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/  [2] 09-04-09 Zernik v Connor et al (2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court, Central District of California, Dkt#105: Compiled Records of Perverted Discrepancy Noticeshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/39773867/  [3] 11-05-30 PRESS RELEASE: Judge Richard Leon, US District Court,DC master of the Leave to file deniedhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/56612919/  [4] 10-10-20 The US Courts Established a Policy Excluding Any Papers Pertaining to Judicial Corruption from
Page 3/3 August 25, 2011the First Amendment Right to File Petitionshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/39788364/  __________  
At 04:39 AM 8/24/2011, W wrote:
 I'm not sure that I understand, Dr. Jose. One does not require leave to file a petition such asoo, it sounds like under the guise of "leave to file denied" the judge dismissed your petition _______ you mention, if indeed, that is what it was.Sowithout hearing. And that is the appeala ble issue.W ___  Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 04:02:45 +0300illegal conduct by public officialot exactly addressing your question... but close...have sued in US District Court, Washington DC US DOJ, FBI and others, under "Petition to Compely then, I had no surprise, when the outcome was simulated litigation, where my papers were returnedZ
-30 PRESS RELEASE: Judge Richard Leon, US District Court,DC master of the Leave to filew.scribd.com/doc/56612919/ 
To: lawsters@googlegroups.comFrom: jz12345@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: citizen right to stopN IUS Officer to Perform his Duties." (
Zernik v Melson et al 
- same Melson who later became infamous asGun Walker)Bto me, with hand inscription by US Judge Richard Leon "Leave to File Denied"...J 
[1] 11-05deniedhttp://ww 
At 03:05 AM 8/24/2011, JP wrote:n Tue, 8/23/11, DE
 izen right to stop illegal conduct by public official:14 PMi have info here in idaho that our local sheriff is poaching elk and deer. i have one eyewitness andthere any statutes either federal or local that address whether a private citizen can sue to stop illegal __________ this is the core question __________ 
From: DESubject: citTo: lawsters@googlegroups.comDate: Tuesday, August 23, 2011, 3possibly a second who is in alaska working at the moment. i sent in a public records request to see ifthe sheriff had any license to hunt the elk he was seen cleaning. the local fish and game state the infois confidential and exempt from disclosure.isconduct by an elected official?

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->