Plaintiffs-relators seek declaratory judgment, injunctive and Mandamus Relief. Defendants-respondents are the state of ohio, state attorney general, governor. T-, CASE No. JUDGE Case Designation "H" Complaint With Constitutional Issues for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive and Mandamus Relief.
Plaintiffs-relators seek declaratory judgment, injunctive and Mandamus Relief. Defendants-respondents are the state of ohio, state attorney general, governor. T-, CASE No. JUDGE Case Designation "H" Complaint With Constitutional Issues for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive and Mandamus Relief.
Plaintiffs-relators seek declaratory judgment, injunctive and Mandamus Relief. Defendants-respondents are the state of ohio, state attorney general, governor. T-, CASE No. JUDGE Case Designation "H" Complaint With Constitutional Issues for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive and Mandamus Relief.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
State ex rel. ProgressOhio.org :
172 E. State St., Ste. 203 : 1 1CVHOS -10647
Columbus, OH 43215, : CASENO.
and :
James W. Spillman : JUDGE
646 Lexington Ave. :
Marion, Ohio 43302, :
and 2
Ivan Stithem + Case Designation “H”
303 Executive Drive, Apt. O :
Marion, Ohio 43302,
and
Bobbie L. Peters + Complaint With Constitutional Issues
14999 Wheeler Road + For Declaratory Judgment And
Lagrange, Ohio 44050, : Injunctive and Mandamus Relief
and :
Michelle L. Ward Mowery
4623 Tacoma Ave.
Lorain, Ohio 44055,
and
Hubert Morgan
5500 Ingleside Ave.
Vermillion, Ohio 44089,
and
Tina K. Gift
131 South Wild Cherry Lane
Congress, Ohio 44287,
and
Amic A. Puster
1040 Sunshine Court
Grafton, Ohio 44044,
Plaintiffs-Relators,State of Ohio
clo Mike DeWine
Ohio Attorney General
30 East Broad St. 14" Floor
Columbus, Ohio 43215,
and
John R. Kasich in his Official Capacity
‘As Governor, State of Ohio
77 South High Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215,
and
Mike DeWine in his Official Capacity
As Ohio Attomey General
30 East Broad St. 14" Floor
Columbus, Ohio 43215,
and
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation
and Correction
c/o its Director Gary C. Mohr
770 West Broad St.
Columbus, OH 43222,
and
Gary C. Mohr, Director
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation
and Correction
770 West Broad St.
Columbus, OH 43222,
and
Ohio Department of Admin. Services
clo its Director Robert Blair
30 East Broad St., Ste 4040
Columbus, OH 43215,
and
Robert Blair, Director
Ohio Department of Admin. Services
30 East Broad St., Ste 4040
‘Columbus, OH 43215,
Defendants-Respondents.Nature of the Action
1. This action is brought by Plaintifis-Relators seeking Declaratory Judgment,
Injunctive Relief and a Writ of Mandamus because Am. Sub. H.B. No. 153 of the
129" General Assembly purports to authorize the sale of state-owned prisons to
private contractors and the separate authorizations in Am. Sub. H.B. No. 153 are
unconstitutional and Am, Sub. H. B. No. 153 is itself unconstitutional,
2. Plaintiffs seek: a declaration of the rights of all parties under R.C. 9.06 and R.C.
753.10 as enacted in Am, Sub, H.B. No. 153 of the 129 General Assembly and
under R.C. 4117.01(C) including a declaration that all employees hired by, or who
work for, a contractor or grantee pursuant {0 a contract or deed authorized by
those sections are, or remain, public employees after execution of the contract or
sale and conveyance of the prisons (herein “facilities”), Plaintiffs also seek a
declaration that various sections of R.C. 9.06, R.C. 753.10 enacted or amended in
‘Am, Sub. H.B. No. 153 of the 129" General Assembly (the Appropriations Bill)
be found and declared unconstitutional on its face and as applied and
unenforceable pursuant to: the “One Subject Rule” of Section 15 (D), Article IL,
of the Ohio Constitution, the “Prohibition Against Joining Property Rights” in
Section 4, Article VIII of the Ohio Constitution and Article II, Sections ! and le
of the Ohio Constitution (which allows for a referendum on certain laws).
3. Plaintiffs seek an injunction restraining and enjoining the state of Ohio and all
Defendants from implementing, administering, enforcing or spending any sums
pursuant to the provisions in Am, Sub. H. B. No. 153 as enacted by the 129"
General Assembly; and an injunction restraining and enjoining R.C. 9.06 and R.C.
Subject: Professional Ethics B.A.Ll.B-Ixth Sem Subject Teacher: Dr. Md. Junaid Study Material of Unit-Ii - (C) (A) (B) (C) (D) Topic: Committees of Bar Council of India