Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
The Road to InterFET

The Road to InterFET

Ratings: (0)|Views: 6|Likes:
Published by ClintonFernandes

More info:

Published by: ClintonFernandes on Oct 01, 2008
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/16/2009

pdf

text

original

 
 Security Challenges 
, vol. 4, no. 3 (Spring 2008), pp. 83-98.
- 83 - 
The Road to INTERFET:Bringing the Politics Back In
Clinton Fernandes
This article examines Australia’s strategic policy during the 1999 East Timor crisis. Written as astand-alone piece, it is in some ways a broad counter-point to the essay by Professor HughWhite in the Autumn 2008 issue of
Security Challenges 
.
1
The author, who was Principal Analyst(East Timor) for the Australian Intelligence Corps in 1998 and 1999, argues that the Australiangovernment was not ambivalent about a peacekeeping force; rather, it worked assiduously toprevent such a force. It demonstrates the need for strategic actors to incorporate the rough-and-tumble of domestic politics and public opinion into their sometimes bureaucratic, anaemiccalculations.
The Status Quo
In August 1997, the then Deputy Secretary for Strategy in the Department ofDefence, Hugh White, was putting the finishing touches to the DefenceStrategic Review (
Australia’s Strategic Policy 
).
2
Published just monthsbefore the Indonesian economic crisis, the document said:
Within the next 20 years, Indonesia's economy will likely become thebiggest in our closer region. Indonesia's gross national product will likelyovertake Australia's in that same period, as will its defence budget…President Suharto … has strengthened Indonesia’s cohesion andprosperity.
3
 
Shortly afterwards, Suharto was forced out of office, Indonesia’s economywas in tatters, and its cohesion came under severe threat in Aceh, WestPapua and East Timor. At the time, however, Australian policy towardsIndonesia was operating within a long-established bi-partisan framework; theHoward government maintained its predecessor’s support of the Suhartoregime and of Indonesian rule over East Timor. When the regime crackeddown on pro-democracy demonstrators in July 1996, there had been noofficial expressions of criticism or even disapproval from the new Foreign
1
Hugh White, ‘The Road to INTERFET: Reflections on Australian Strategic DecisionsConcerning East Timor, December 1998-September 1999’,
Security Challenges,
vol. 4 no. 1(Autumn 2008), pp. 69-87.
2
J. Lyons, ‘Operation Backflip’,
The Bulletin 
, 3 August 1999, pp. 20-25.
3
Department of Defence,
Australia’s Strategic Policy 
(Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia,1997), pp. 10-11. The document also assessed that “In the short term … it is unlikely that eitherIndia or Pakistan ... will have a major impact on the East Asian security environment.” Soonafter this assessment both India and Pakistan went nuclear, and then fought each otherferociously over Kargil in Kashmir.
 
Clinton Fernandes - 84 - Security Challenges 
Minister. Deputy Prime Minister Tim Fischer said that Suharto was “perhapsthe world’s greatest figure in the latter half of the 20th century.”
4
 
Fracturing the Bipartisan Consensus
However, a hugely significant event had occurred in 1997: the AustralianLabor Party’s spokesperson on foreign relations, Laurie Brereton, hadfractured the long-standing bipartisan consensus towards Indonesian ruleover East Timor, calling for the first time for a “right of self-determination.”
5
 This was, he argued, the only real solution to the problem of East Timor.The bi-partisanship that had been an enduring feature of Australia’s positionon East Timor had allowed successive governments to contain the problemof public opinion. By maintaining bi-partisanship, parliamentary oppositionsprovided governments with a margin of comfort necessary to neutralisepublic opinion. By the time Howard had come to power, no foreign ministeror shadow foreign minister had visited East Timor in more than twenty years.Brereton’s move opened up political space that had previously been closedto civil society groups that campaigned for democracy in Indonesia and self-determination for East Timor. The constant pressure he would apply inParliament and in the media meant that the government would have nocomfort zone. Particularly in 1999, it was always on the back foot, forced todefend its stance to an increasingly agitated public. Brereton first took thenew policy to the NSW State Party Foreign Affairs Committee. Following itsadoption by Labor’s NSW Conference in October 1997, Brereton took thepolicy to Labor’s National Security and Trade Policy Committee, whichadopted it unaltered. The Labor Party’s proposed platform with the newlanguage was released publicly in November 1997.Thus, in the lead-up to the 3 October 1998 federal election, there was a clearpolicy difference between the government and the opposition on thequestion of self-determination for East Timor. Brereton had also promisedthat Labor would, if elected, appoint “a Special Envoy on East Timor who willwork closely with the United Nations and all the parties involved.”
6
Since theelection was fought primarily over domestic economic policies such as theGoods and Services Tax, the East Timor question did not become a priorityduring the campaign. However, the existence of a policy difference betweenthe two parties forced the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT)to consider the independence of East Timor as part of the caretakerconventions. These conventions are a long-standing feature of AustralianPublic Service procedure: they reflect the principle that, with the dissolutionof the House, the Executive cannot be held accountable for its decisions in
4
D. Lague, ‘The looming crisis with Jakarta’,
Sydney Morning Herald 
, 3 August 1996, p. 15.
5
D. Greenlees, ‘Labor policy ups ante for autonomy in East Timor’,
The Australian 
, 18 October1997.
6
L. Brereton,
Human Rights and Foreign Aid: Speech to the 1998 ACFOA/CAA Federal Election Forum 
, Maughan Church, Adelaide, 28 September 1998.
 
The Road to INTERFET: Bringing the Politics Back In Volume 4, Number 3 (Spring 2008) - 85
the normal manner, and that every general election carries the possibility ofa change of government. Under the caretaker conventions, DFAT (like allother departments) is required to prepare incoming government briefs for theopposition as well as the government. These briefs are prepared on thebasis of the stated intentions of the parties prior to the election. Theycanvass the range of issues involved in the implementation of theseintentions. The incoming government brief prepared in the event of a Laborvictory canvassed Labor’s support for self-determination for East Timor.The brief was in fact written to dissuade Labor from pushing for self-determination.
7
Still, the act of preparing the incoming government briefmeant that DFAT was forced for the very first time to think systematicallyabout the implications of East Timorese independence. As election nightwore on, it became clear that Labor was not going to win even though it hadwon a majority of votes. Brereton and his adviser, the historian Dr PhilipDorling, resolved to exert maximum pressure on the government in supportof East Timorese self-determination. They would be assisted in their effortsby support from a re-energised network of solidarity activists, which hadsensed that a decisive victory to the long struggle was finally in sight.Accordingly, Brereton’s first initiative after the election was to call for apermanent international presence to monitor military activity in East Timor:
Real progress toward a lasting East Timor settlement is unlikely to beachieved amidst allegations of clandestine military action and arming ofpara-military squads. Establishment of an independent and effectiveinternational monitoring presence in East Timor would allow dialogue andnegotiation to proceed in an environment characterised by transparency,improved confidence and trust.
8
 
This was the first time a major national figure with real political clout and aplatform to air his views had called for international monitors.
A Historic Policy Shift?
Also in October 1998, another development unnerved the Indonesian andAustralian foreign policy establishments. Indonesia’s new president, B.J.Habibie, had previously announced that many combat troops would bewithdrawn from East Timor. Alexander Downer praised this decision, callingit “a step in the right direction.”
9
However, Dr Andrew McNaughtan, aSydney-based activist, smuggled out the entire Indonesian army personnelrecords for East Timor. The documents showed that Indonesia was merelyrotating combat personnel, not withdrawing them, and that its claims ofdemilitarisation in East Timor were false. McNaughtan and his fellowactivists maximised publicity by holding simultaneous press conferences indifferent cities around the world. The exposure of the personnel records led
7
The content of the brief is confidential, as is the identity of my source.
8
L. Brereton, Statement to the Press, Parliament House, Canberra, 30 October 1998.
9
I. Stewart, ‘Downer hails Timor troop withdrawal’,
The Australian 
, 28 July 1998
.
 

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->