Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
LIBERI v TATIZ (C.D. CA) - 360 - REPLY in support of MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint - gov.uscourts.cacd.497989.360.0

LIBERI v TATIZ (C.D. CA) - 360 - REPLY in support of MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint - gov.uscourts.cacd.497989.360.0

Ratings: (0)|Views: 29|Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
08/29/2011 360 REPLY in support of MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint 338[RECAP] filed by Defendant Oracle Corporation. (Crone, Daryl) (Entered: 08/29/2011)
08/29/2011 360 REPLY in support of MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint 338[RECAP] filed by Defendant Oracle Corporation. (Crone, Daryl) (Entered: 08/29/2011)

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Aug 29, 2011
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/29/2011

pdf

text

original

 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728 
DEFENDANT ORACLE’S REPLY RE: MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
 
    C
    R    O    N    E
    H
    A    W    X    H    U    R    S    T
    L    L    P
    1    0    8    8    0    W
    I    L    S    H    I    R    E
    B
    O    U    L    E    V    A    R    D
 ,    S
    U    I    T    E
    1    1    5    0    L
    O    S
    A
    N    G    E    L    E    S
 ,    C
    A    L    I    F    O    R    N    I    A
    9    0    0    2    4
   T  e   l  :   (   3   1   0   )   8   9   3  -   5   1   5   0
      ●
 
   F  a  x  :   (   3   1   0   )   8   9   3  -   5   1   9   5
Daryl M. Crone (Bar No. 209610)daryl@cronehawxhurst.comJoshua P. Gelbart (Bar No. 274021) jgelbart@cronehawxhurst.comCRONE HAWXHURST LLP10880 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1150Los Angeles, California 90024Telephone: (310) 893-5150Facsimile: (310) 893-5195Attorneys for DefendantOracle CorporationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIASOUTHERN DIVISIONLISA LIBERI,
et al.
,Plaintiffs,vs.ORLY TAITZ a/k/a DR. ORLY TAITZ,
et al.
,Defendants.Case No.: SACV11-0485AG(AJWx) Date: September 12, 2011Time: 10:00 a.m.
DEFENDANT ORACLECORPORATION’S REPLYMEMORANDUM OF POINTS ANDAUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OFMOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRSTAMENDED COMPLAINT
 
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 360 Filed 08/29/11 Page 1 of 17 Page ID#:8371
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728 -i-
DEFENDANT ORACLE’S REPLY RE: MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
 
    C
    R    O    N    E
    H
    A    W    X    H    U    R    S    T
    L    L    P
    1    0    8    8    0    W
    I    L    S    H    I    R    E
    B
    O    U    L    E    V    A    R    D
 ,    S
    U    I    T    E
    1    1    5    0    L
    O    S
    A
    N    G    E    L    E    S
 ,    C
    A    L    I    F    O    R    N    I    A
    9    0    0    2    4
   T  e   l  :   (   3   1   0   )   8   9   3  -   5   1   5   0
      ●
 
   F  a  x  :   (   3   1   0   )   8   9   3  -   5   1   9   5
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage
Preliminary Statement ................................................................................................. 1Argument ..................................................................................................................... 1I. PLAINTIFFS IDENTIFY NO BASIS TO HOLD ORACLE LIABLEFOR THE TAITZES’ ALLEGED INVASIONS OF THEIR PRIVACY ........ 1A.
 
Oracle is Not Liable For Allegedly “Allowing” Yosef Taitz toObtain and Distribute Plaintiffs’ Private Information ............................ 1B. Plaintiffs Also Offer No Reason Why Their Duplicative Secondand Third Claims Should Survive ........................................................... 3II.
 
ORACLE DID NOT VIOLATE CALIFORNIA’S INFORMATIONPRACTICES ACT BY SUPPOSEDLY “ALLOWING” MR. TAITZTO ACCESS THIRD-PARTY DATABASES ................................................. 4III. PLAINTIFFS TACITLY CONCEDE THAT ORACLE NEVER POSSESSED OR PUBLICLY DISCLOSED THEIR SOCIALSECURITY NUMBERS ................................................................................... 4IV. PLAINTIFFS NOWHERE SUPPORT THEIR ARGUMENT THATORACLE IS LIABLE FOR ALLEGED DEFAMATORYSTATEMENTS PUBLISHED BY OTHER DEFENDANTS .......................... 5V. ORACLE’S DISTRIBUTION OF PURPORTEDLY INSECURESOFTWARE NEITHER AMOUNTED TO “EXTREME ANDOUTRAGEOUS CONDUCT” NOR PROXIMATELY CAUSEDPLAINTIFFS’ HARM ...................................................................................... 6VI. PLAINTIFFS DO NOT RESPOND TO ORACLE’S MOTION TODISMISS THE FOURTEENTH CLAIM FOR VIOLATIONS OF THEFAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT .................................................................. 7VII. PLAINTIFFS DO NOT RESPOND TO ORACLE’S MOTION TODISMISS THE SEVENTEENTH CLAIM EITHER ........................................ 8VIII. PLAINTIFFS DO NOT DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY COULDADEQUATELY AMEND THEIR STATUTORY UNFAIR COMPETITION ALLEGATIONS ................................................................... 8IX. PLAINTIFFS OFFER NO REASON WHY THE COURT SHOULDIMPOSE A GENERAL DUTY ON ORACLE TO GUARD AGAINST NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS .......................... 9X. PLAINTIFFS HAVE NO RIGHT TO DISCOVER ORACLE’SSOFTWARE SOURCE CODE BEFORE DISMISSAL OF THE RESIPSA LOQUITUR CLAIM ............................................................................. 10
 
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 360 Filed 08/29/11 Page 2 of 17 Page ID#:8372
 
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728 -ii-
DEFENDANT ORACLE’S REPLY RE: MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
 
    C
    R    O    N    E
    H
    A    W    X    H    U    R    S    T
    L    L    P
    1    0    8    8    0    W
    I    L    S    H    I    R    E
    B
    O    U    L    E    V    A    R    D
 ,    S
    U    I    T    E
    1    1    5    0    L
    O    S
    A
    N    G    E    L    E    S
 ,    C
    A    L    I    F    O    R    N    I    A
    9    0    0    2    4
   T  e   l  :   (   3   1   0   )   8   9   3  -   5   1   5   0
      ●
 
   F  a  x  :   (   3   1   0   )   8   9   3  -   5   1   9   5
Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 12
Case 8:11-cv-00485-AG -AJW Document 360 Filed 08/29/11 Page 3 of 17 Page ID#:8373

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->