Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COM
GII THIU
GII THIU CAC TAI NGHIN CU KHOA HOC TAI HI NGHI NI KHOA TOAN QUC TAI THANH PH H CHI MINH THANG 7/ 2011
BNH L TIM MCH L NGUYN NHN HNG U GY T VONG TI CC NC CNG NGHIP PHT TRIN TRN TONTH GII
BNH L TIM MCH V I THO NG GIA TNG NHANH CHNG V TR THNH NGUYN NHN QUAN TRNG GY T VONG,
Chet ot ngot
X va ong mach
+ Tang huyet ap + ai thao ng + Roi loan lipid mau + + Hoi chng chuyen hoa
Suy tim
giai oan cuoi
T vong
5
T suat TOAN THE GII nam 2000 do cac yeu to nguy c hang au chi phoi
T suat cao cac nc ang phat trien T suat thap cac nc ang phat trien Cac nc a phat trien
S t vong (n v ngn)
Theo thao luan gia IBLF vi WHO tai Luan on thang 10/2002
45.4
Normotensive Hypertensive 22.7 21.3 9.5 12.4 3.3 6.2 13.9 9.9 5.0 2.0 7.3 3.5 2.1 6.3
40
Biennial ageadjusted rate per 1000 patients 30
20
10 0
2.4
Risk ratio:
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
Bnh thng
mmHg
120-129 /80-84
140-159 /90-99
Giai oan I
160-179 /100-109
Giai oan II
>180-110
11
<120
120-139
140-159
160-179
180-199
200
12
Tan suat xay ra ot qu tren benh nhan chau A cao hn benh mach vanh
Hisayama Study
1,400 1,200 T le tren 100,000 1,000 800 600 400 200 0
196173 197486 19882000 196173 197486 19882000
Men
Women
Kubo et al. Stroke 2003;34:234954 13
Benh ly tim mach khac han gia ngi chau A va ngi da trang: Tan suat ot qu cao hn han
16 14
T le tnh theo 1000 BN nam 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
SHEP
1
16 13
16
2
3 4
2.6
Syst-Eur Europe
STONE China
Syst-China China
NICS-EH Japan
Co-operative Research Group. JAMA 1991;265:325564 2MRC Working Party. Br Med J 1985;291:97104 3Staessen et al. Lancet 1997;350:75764
et al. J Hypertens 1996;14:123745 5Liu et al. J Hypertens 1998;16:18239 6Ogihara et al. Hypertens Res 2000;23:337 14
4Gong
Huyet ap va nguy c ot qu
8.00
Ngi chau A
-10 mmHg: 40%
8.00
Da trang
-10 mmHg: 24%
4.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
0.50
15
treatment
BP control
Ch c 95 BN T/1040 BN (9,1%) ang dng thuc tr THA t HA<130/80 mmHg => Phn ln cha kim sot c HA.
Kho st tnh hnh kim sot huyt p bnh nhn i tho ng ti Vit Nam
khng t HA<130/80
17
nhm BN n tr liu, t l t HA mc tiu: 6%. nhm BN c iu tr phi hp, t l t HA mc tiu cao hn gp 2,1 ln (1,36-3,27) vi tin cy l 95% => c ngha thng k.
6%
12%
13%
phi hp 3 thuc
13%
phi hp 4 thuc
18
CAC KHUYEN CAO QUAN TRONG VE CHAN OAN IEU TR VA PHONG NGA BENH TANG HUYET AP
Lien cac uy ban quoc gia Hoa Hoi tim mach Chau Au Ky Hoi tang huyet ap the gii Hoi tang huyet ap Chau Au
To chc y te the gii
WHO/ ISH
1993
JNC
1999
1972 JNC I 1980 JNC II 1984 JNC III 1988 JNC IV 1993 JNC V 1997 JNC VI 2003 JNC VII 2011 JNC VIII ?
ESH/ ESC
2003 2007 2009
19
Bnh thng
THA o 2
THA o 2
20
THA
Tng LDL.C v TC Gim HDL-C v tng TG Hi chng chuyn ho; i tho ng Bnh thn mn t vn ng, bo ph Trm cm v stress tinh thn
21
yu t nguy c
Calcium antagonistsDHPs
23
C che t ieu hoa HUYET AP = CUNG LNG TIM X SC CAN NGOAI BIEN Tang huyet ap = Tang cung lng tim va/hoac Tang sc can ngoai bien
TIEN TAI CO BOP CO THAT CHC NANG CHEN KENH Ca++ THAY OI CAU TRUC (PH AI)
C TIM
TAI PHAN PHOI KHOI LNG DCH TANG HOAT TNH TK GIAO CAM
LI TIEU
CHEN BETA
24
ANGIOTENSINOGEN (Gan)
NON-ACE Chymase cathepsin G tPA, tonin, GAGE RENIN (than) ANGIOTENSIN I
ACE (Kininase II) BRADYKININ
ANGIOTENSIN II
AT1
TAC ONG TREN THAN
AT2
AT3
AT4
ATn
GAY KHAT
CO MACH
ALDOSTERONE
25
ANGIOTENSIN I
Men chuyen (ACE)
Tissue ACE
ANGIOTENSIN II
Co mach
AT1
Tai hap thu Na+/than Bai tiet Aldosterone Kch hoat he giao cam Bai tiet chat co mach Tang trng va tang sinh Dan mach
AT2
Chong tang sinh
APOPTOSIS
26
27
Angiotensinogen Renin
Ang I
ACE
Ang II
AT1 Receptor
Aldosterone
Na+/H2O retention
Vasoconstriction Hypertension 28 Gibbons GH. 1998; Adapted from: Mller DN & Luft FC. 2006
Heart
Hypertrophy Fibrosis Vasoconstriction
ACE
Vessels
Ang II ARBs
AT1 Receptor
Brain
Biological effects
Vasoconstriction
Direct renin inhibition acts at the point of activation of the Renin System and neutralizes the PRA rise
Direct renin inhibitor
Angiotensinogen Renin Ang I
Non ACE pathways Kidney
Glomerular vasoconstriction Inflammation Fibrosis
Heart
Hypertrophy Fibrosis Vasoconstriction
PRA
ACE
Vessels
Feedback Loop
Ang II
AT1 Receptor
Brain
Biological effects
Vasoconstriction
Unlike ACEIs and ARBs, aliskiren reduces Ang I, Ang II and PRA
Direct renin inhibitor
Angiotensinogen Renin
Ang I
Non ACE pathways
ACE
Feedback Loop
Ang II
ACEIs ARBs
AT1 Receptor
Ang I ACEI
Ang II
Renin
PRA
ARB
Aliskiren
31 Azizi M et al. 2006; Adapted from: Mller DN & Luft FC. 2006
(Pro)renin receptor actions: Binding of (pro)renin Increased renin catalytic activity Activates VSMC ERK1/2
AT1 Receptor
Target cell
(Pro)renin receptor
Vasoconstriction Remodelling
33
Hieu qua Ha ap
Bao ve C quan ch
(SBP 140159 hoac DBP 9099 mmHg) Thuoc li tieu loai Thiazide cho a so bn Co the xem xet ACEI, ARB, BB, CCB, hoac phoi hp
(SBP >160 hoacDBP >100 mmHg) Phoi hp 2 thuoc cho a so bn (thng la li tieu loai thiazide va ACEI, hoac ARB, hoac BB, hoac CCB)
Khong at HA muc tieu Tang lieu toi u hoac them thuoc khac cho en khi at HA muc tieu Nen tham van chuyen gia ve THA
35
Thuoc li tieu loai Thiazide cho a so bn Co the xem xet ACEI, ARB, BB, CCB, hoac phoi hp
36
37
CAC TH NGHIEM LAM SANG VA C S HNG DAN CHO NHNG CH NH BAT BUOC OI VI TNG NHOM THUOC (7)
TNH TRNG NGUY C CAO VI CH NH BT BUC THUC C KHUYN CO
LI TIU CHN BETA CHN CANXI I KHNG ALDO
UCMC
UCTT
I THO NG
BNH THN MN
38
39
Patient 1
Patient 2
Patient 3
T l p ng
60
50% p ng
40
20
0 Calcium Alpha2 antagonist agonist Betablocker Diuretic Alpha1 antagonist ACEI Placebo
ALLHAT SBP <140/DBP <90 UKPDS ABCD DBP <85 DBP <75
MDRD HOT
AASK IDNT
DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure. Bakris GL et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;36:646-661. Lewis EJ et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:851-860. Cushman WC et al. J Clin Hypertens. 2002;4:393-405.
42
JNC IV 1988
Diuretics or -Blocker or ACEInhibitors Or Ca-Antag.
JNC V 1993
JNC VI
JNC VII
1977
1997
2003
Focus on sysolic Hypertension HOT-Trial : 70% of pts required Combination therapy Focus on Combination therapy
Diuretics More or individulized -Blocker therapy or recommenACE-Inhibitors ded or Titration of Ca-Antag.. one (Mono)or substance -Blocker Low dose or (/ -Blocker) Combination Titration of one therapy as an substance option recommended
Monotherapy
Combinationtherapy 43
Li tiu
Beta Blocker
Beta Blocker
ARB
Alpha Blocker
CCB
ACE inhibitor
ACE inhibitor
2008 ACC
-B
young
Beta Blocker
ARB
Alpha Blocker
CCB
ACE inhibitor
D
Diuretic
CCB
old
Adapted from European Society for Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology Guidelines Committee.J Hypertens. 2003;21:10111053.
47
48
CCB
Arteriodilation Peripheral edema Effective in low-renin patients Reduces cardiac ischemia
ARB
Venodilation Attenuates peripheral edema Effective in high-renin patients No effect on cardiac ischemia
CCB
Arterial dilation
No venous dilation
50
Capillary bed
23.0
n=80
20
70% difference
15
10
* 6.8
0
Amlodipine 10 mg
*p<0.01 vs. amlodipine
Amlodipine/Valsartan 10/160 mg
Fogari et al. J Hum Hypertens 2007;21:2204 52
54
55
56
Stroke in USA
Leading cause of disability Third leading cause of death 275,000 deaths in 2002 72% occurred at age 65 or >
Source: www.cdc.gov
57
55-64
65-74
75-84
85-94
Men
Women
Framingham Heart Study Adapted from Vasan et al in Hurts The Heart Mc Graw Hill 2004
58
Tuoi tho con ngi lien quan en cac ong mach cua ho
Sir William Osler 1892
Tuoi tho cua te bao noi mac trung bnh khoang 30 nam. Sau thi gian nay, tuoi tac lam cho chung mat dan va c thay the bi cac te bao xung quanh t co kha nang tao ra EDRF.
Paul M. Vanhoutte Chantal M. Boulanger 1994
59
60
61
130
130
110
110
Ap lc mch ( PP)
80
80
70
70
0
18-29
0
18-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+
Ph n, tui (nm)
62
p lc mch (PULSE PRESSURE) tin on nguy c tt nht bnh nhn CHA ln tui A Meta-Analysis
EWPHE (N=840)
Syst-Eur (N=4695)
2-Year Risk Of End Point Syst-China (N=2394)
63
64
Younger
Older
65
Figure 1
66
Stroke
D LVL
PP
LVH
Figure 1
- 305 events
atenolol/thiazide amlodipine/perindopril
Mean difference 2.7
137.7 136.1
mm Hg
94.8 94.5
Time (years)
69
All-cause mortality
%
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
Number at risk Amlodipine/perindopril Atenolol/thiazide
2.0
9441 9415
3.0
9332 9261
4.0
9167 9085
5.0
8078 7975
Years
9639 9618
70
4.0
3.0
1.0
0.0 2.0
9331 9274
3.0
9156 9059
4.0
8972 8843
5.0
7863 7720
Years
9639 9618
71
HR 1.13 (1.00-1.26)
P 0.043
20.0
15.0 10.0
Atenolol / Thiazide
16%
5.0
HR=0.84 (0.79-0.90) P <.0001 0.0 0.0 1.0 9166 9115 2.0 Years 8808 8692 3.0 8455 8259 4.0 5.0 8118 7872 6965 6710
72
In Coversyl/amlodipine patients, Central Aortic Systolic Blood Pressure is 4.3 mmHg lower than with atenolol-thiazide
140
atenolol/thiazide amlodipine/perindopril
135
mm Hg
130
125
120
115
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Time (Years)
Circulation. 2006;113:1213-1225
73
74
Statement
No mention of over 80s, treated as other patients For those aged over 80 at the time of diagnosis of hypertension, no clear guidance can be given offer patients over 80 years of age the same treatment as other patients over 55, taking account of any comorbidity and their existing burden of drug use, but Patients over 80 years of age are poorly represented in clinical trials and the effectiveness of treatment in this group is less certain In subjects aged 80 years or over, evidence for antihypertensive treatment is as yet inconclusive
ESH/ESC 2007
Increase in mortality
Reduction in strokes
This dilemma provided the rationale for the HYpertension in the Very Elderly Trial
?
? ?
Design
Conclusion
XIN CM N S THEO DI
CA QU NG NGHIP
83